Re[2]: filter question
Hello Luc, Monday, November 22, 2004, 7:21:49 PM, you wrote: L But i get a a feeling that in the first scenario a solution isn't L possible (except maybe with regex but i'm not an expert on it) This is The Bat! There is always a way :) Try this: Header Field To: is [EMAIL PROTECTED] If there is anything else in the To: field this will not be matched. This does not cover CC or BCC fields, so if you need that let me know and I will see what can be done with those. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filter Question
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 5:53:25 PM, you wrote: RO I don't know the site you saw these filters, but TB allows you to copy RO and paste filters from the sorting office to a text editor and back. RO Go to the sorting office RO Select a filter RO Press Ctrl-C (don't use the 'copy'-button that duplicates the filter) RO Go to a text editor (eg a new message in TB) RO Press Ctrl-V . That's what I needed to know. Now it makes sense. I was beginning to wonder how you could type a really long string. -- Thanks for your help Rusty Farabee Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filter question
Marck, Is there any reason why TB! would not automatically filter a message (when Manual only is not ticked in the filter rule) but will do so when asked to Re-filter Messages (Folderright click)? M Sometimes rules used to get corrupted. I would often have to M re-create a rule from scratch to get it to work again. No amount of M tweaking would put it right. I didn't realize this happened. Too bad this is the case, but it's important to know. In the Sorting Office under the Options tab, should I always have the Continue processing with other filters box checked? M Certainly not. It's very much a special case option. Normally a M rule has moved a message and it's no longer in the Inbox to process M any further with other filters. Thanks for clarifying that too. M Where? In Selective download filters? I don't really understand M how you have done that. What I meant to say is that many of my messages come through one of the accounts (Account A) and are filtered through to folders in other accounts. Fine. These messages coming through Account A are also duplicated to another account inbox (Account X). Account X shares the same pop account with Account A, which I guess is why this occurs. Account X uses different From and Reply To addresses for a separate business. Now I've set up a filter that trashes all the dupes except those addressed to the business. Is this the most efficient way to do this? Am I clear as mud? M It's hard to tell what you are trying to achieve. Just trying to navigate the land of the filters successfully, Marck. :-) There seems to be something about it I just can't grasp easily. Sorry to be so slow. These early filter difficulties are similar to ones I had in a different mail program (which also promised an excellent filter system) which was one of the reasons I abandoned it. Thanks, -- Pat A Canadian in Houston Using TB! v2.01.3 on Windows XP Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filter question
Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:49:42 AM, you wrote: [snip] TF This is absolutely correct. Sorry, I didn't point it out. You need to TF copy the file account.srx from the account with the filters to the TF account where you want the filters to be copied to. It is a good idea TF to back up (rename) the file account.srx in the destination directory TF first. Thanks to you both .. this'll make life easier :-) Lynn 1.60h on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Filter question
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 8:40:00 PM, you wrote: JA Hi Lynn, JA On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:52:49 -0700, you wrote: In my quest for spam reduction options, I've decided to filter on the ip's of spam mails which apparently have forged 'from' addresses. If I make a list of these and use the 'add' button to add a rule, will these rules be applied as 'or', or as 'and' .. ? JA I'd have thought trying to filter on IP addresses is a little difficult to do JA when it comes to spam, seeing as the large number of sources. You'll be forever JA updating your filters, and then eventually get lost in the massive list. You JA may even end up filtering mail you probably shouldn't. Just a thought ;) I'm not doing them all, but there are a few obvious troublemakers .. [snip] JA Selective Downloads filter allows you to read a text file if I remember JA correctly. I've seen some people utilising this to block known spammers JA locations. I need to look at this further .. it has a blacklist already loaded .. do you (or anybody) know if this is updated anywhere? JA I think one of the better methods would be to speak to your mail provider, and JA see if they can implement real time black lists, and use services such as JA http://mail-abuse.org or even http://www.ordb.org. Again, just a thought. I'm trying to start only one project at a time .. this month's project is filters :-) I have alternatives stacked up, and will get to them all eventually :-) Thanks for adding a few more to the list .. My projected lifespan is coming up on 239 years! lolol! Lynn 1.60h on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Re[2]: Filter question
Hi Lynn, On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:17:43 -0700, you wrote: I'm not doing them all, but there are a few obvious troublemakers .. Most or .kr and those kind of areas? ;) JA Selective Downloads filter allows you to read a text file if I remember JA correctly. I've seen some people utilising this to block known spammers JA locations. I need to look at this further .. it has a blacklist already loaded .. do you (or anybody) know if this is updated anywhere? Erm... I didn't know there was a pre-loaded blacklist, so I couldn't say. May be something I missed somewhere, and cannot check until monday. Take a look at the filter, and see where it references. Just out of curiousity, does anybody know if you can reference a file on a webserver to use instead of a local file in the selective downloads thing? Like for example: http://www.mydomain.com/spammers.txt? Would be good... could then start working on a central type of system to block more spammers, and pool everybody's knowledge, and experiences ;) I'm trying to start only one project at a time .. this month's project is filters :-) I have alternatives stacked up, and will get to them all eventually :-) That is why the rbl's are left to your mail provider, and not you ;) Thanks for adding a few more to the list .. My projected lifespan is coming up on 239 years! lolol! lol... join the club... mine are stacking up too ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Filter question
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:09:24 PM, you wrote: JA Hi Thomas, JA On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:38:56 +0700, you wrote: ..for example copying the account.srx file over. ;-) JA Wouldn't know what the file was... but I'm sure you're probably right... I would JA peek, but work is a little far away ;) I found it, but it's only 1k ... I have a *lot* of filters .. would this be it? or .. wait .. in the account folder there's one that's 44k .. sounds more likely ..? Lynn 1.60h on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Re[2]: Filter question
Hi Lynn, On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:36:30 -0700, you wrote: I found it, but it's only 1k ... I have a *lot* of filters .. would this be it? or .. wait .. in the account folder there's one that's 44k .. sounds more likely ..? It is more likely to be the one in the account folder as each account has its own set of filters, so would probably store it in its [account] own folder. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Filter question
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 12:18:00 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Robert, TF On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:25:02 -0400 GMT (12/07/02, 01:25 +0700 GMT), TF Robert D. wrote: Copy everything between beginfilter endfilter Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V RD I like this idea ---so I tried it and, obviously, nothing happens on what RD I am running. Shouldn't I have seen a new filter called *Spam Filter* ??? TF She should have said including BeginFilter and Endfilter. I'm not savvy enough to have said anything like that - yet :-) Lynn 1.60h on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Filter question
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 6:59:10 AM, you wrote: G Hi Lynn, G Copy everything between beginfilter endfilter G Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V G You have now copied a filter. G String1astring2a are AND functions G String2bstring2b are AND functions G String1(ab) and String2(ab) or OR functions to each other. G Hope this helps. [snip] Hi Gerard - This is way over my head .. Am I correct in assuming that somewhere in here I can plug in ip #'s or whatever I'm filtering on? I will keep it and puzzle over it until I get it figured out .. Thanks! Lynn 1.60h on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Filter question
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 7:30:04 AM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Lynn, MDP @11 July 2002, 06:52 -0700 (14:52 UK time) Lynn Turriff [LT] in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: LT If I make a list of these and use the 'add' button to add a rule, LT will these rules be applied as 'or', or as 'and' .. ? MDP These are 'AND' filters. LT If the latter, can I make a list on the 'alternative' tab, MDP These are 'OR' filters. LT and if I do that, how do I separate them? MDP Add Set for each alternative ad-infinitum. MDP - -- MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator [snip] Hi Marck - Thanks - will do this until I can figure out Gerard's solution :-) Lynn 1.60h on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Filter question
Shahar, On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, at 07:19:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:49 AM where I live) you wrote: S I found a working solution, all in one filter and I tested it with S about 200 messages from 10 different email addresses and it's smooth. Can you enlighten us on the logic ??? -- Warm regards, Raj mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Even crime wouldn't pay if the government ran it. Replied on Monday, February 25, 2002 using TB Ver 1.54 Beta/39 on Windows 2000 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: Filter question
Same problem ... Sender, reply to and To all have the same format! For example, I get mail from a mailing list where the sender may be one of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc There is no guarantee as to what node it will come from or whether they'll introduce a new node. So, I'd rather not introduce a lot of alternative filters. Can't you just use To: listaddress? Looks easier. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: Filter question
Hello Jan, Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 8:04:18 PM, you wrote: Hello Stuart. At 7:52 PM on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 you wrote the following about Filter question: Stuart What I really would like to be able to do is say Stuart sender: list and xyz.com Stuart Is there any way to do that ? Sure. If I understood you correctlyh, just create rule 1, then add a rule 2 (don't use the alternative option). Well, no, not quite, because as I understand this I am looking for a string inclusive of the header. So, I can look for sender: list but how can I look for sender: xyz.com - this will surely fail Stuart -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant
Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 1:58:21 AM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF Hello Miles, TF On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:27:27 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 10:27 +0800 GMT), TF Miles Alexander wrote: MA If an incoming transaction does not match *any* filters, I want MA to: MA * Flag it as found (possibly) TF Make one one filter at the end, which does ntohing else but flag the TF message. MA * Leave it on the server MA * If there are unknown transactions identified (read: spam and such) MA then I want to automatically bring up the Dispatch to Server option MA so that I can ascertain what to do with the new email. TF These feature can only be set per-account, not per-message. And also TF not by filters. MA I have breezed through the manual (designed for experienced users) TF Please advise where you got it, as I am interested in a copy. Not certain if you are simply making light of the manual thing but I copied the online manual and created a .doc file for Word use. If you would like a copy of that, I can ZIP it and send it to your email of choice. -- Best regards, Milesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WinPlat. Windows 98, Build. MacroBuild. v1.03.8912 Beta III Mental MeltDowns: There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere. Isaac Asimov -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant
Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when, Thomas typed the following: Thomas, So, what you are telling me is that the Incoming filters are processed in a hierarchy and putting my *else* filter at the bottom of that list (thus the Move Up and Move Down feature) will get me what I want? The I will name this filter -- appropriately -- my Else filter. -- Best regards, Milesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WinPlat. Windows 98, Build. RitLabs The Bat! v.1.54 Beta/8, MacroBuild. v1.03.8912 Beta III Mental MeltDowns: You died because you were different, but we are all alike. -Friends of Benjamin Hermansen who was killed by neo-Nazis, January 2001 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant
Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when, Thomas typed the following: Selective downloads: Yes: this seems to be a very good way to resolve the situation but do I need to imply (within the window) the following format?: String: [Person One], Location: [Sender], Presence: [No] String: [beer], Location: [Text], Presence: [No] String: [orange], Location: [Anywhere], Presence: [No] What I would like to do is have a list of signal strings that are valid but use the Presence=No syntax. Also, just to make sure that you understand what I am leading to: The syntax above -- including field descriptions and values goes *into* the signal strings window? Hope this is clear. :) -- Best regards, Milesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WinPlat. Windows 98, Build. RitLabs The Bat! v.1.54 Beta/8, MacroBuild. v1.03.8912 Beta III Mental MeltDowns: -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant
Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:23:21 PM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF No, this won't work. The Selective Download Filter downloads all TF message headers and then processes only these. The signal string must TF be matched exactly *in the headers* (so Text and Anywhere won't TF apply), and then you can use the options under the Advanced tab. Got it working with header info from an external text file. I like the way it works. I have chosen to ignore all that do not match and then I can kick off the Dispatch to view those that did not make it. Cool. -- Best regards, Milesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WinPlat. Windows 98, Build. RitLabs The Bat! v.1.54 Beta/8, MacroBuild. v1.03.8912 Beta III Mental MeltDowns: Take a step forward, lads. It will be easier that way. Erskine Childers (1870-1922), British-born author and Irish patriot. Last words before being executed by firing squad, 24 Nov 1922. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant
Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:17:37 PM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF Hello Miles, TF On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:07:39 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 23:07 +0800 GMT), TF Miles Alexander wrote: Drugs may lead to nowhere, but at least it's the scenic route. I will add this to my collection of quotes! -- Best regards, Milesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WinPlat. Windows 98, Build. RitLabs The Bat! v.1.54 Beta/8, MacroBuild. v1.03.8912 Beta III Mental MeltDowns: When I'm not in my right mind, my left mind gets pretty crowded. Stephen Wright. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Re[2]: Filter question from the Ignorant
Hello Thomas, Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 2:21:07 PM, was when, Thomas typed the following: TF Hello Miles, TF On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:21:13 -0400 GMT (24/09/2001, 02:21 +0800 GMT), TF Miles Alexander wrote: MA I will add this to my collection of quotes! TF Cool. (I stole it somewhere. g) Thomas, If you would like a few hundred (each in text file format), I can send you via ZIP. Just let me know. -- Best regards, Milesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WinPlat. Windows 98, Build. RitLabs The Bat! v.1.54 Beta/8, MacroBuild. v1.03.8912 Beta III Mental MeltDowns: -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Re[2]: Filter question
Hello Januk,
Thursday, January 11, 2001, 9:31:23 AM, you wrote:
JA Hello Thomas,
JA TF = Thomas Fernandez
JA On Thu, 11 Jan 2001 at 16:15:24 GMT +0800 (which was 12:15 AM where
JA I live) witnesses say Thomas Fernandez typed:
TF Hi Emmanuele,
TF On Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:03:41 +0100GMT (11/01/2001, 16:03 +0800GMT),
TF Emmanuele Vigni wrote:
EV There is also unwanted text in them, but only one email to capture..
TF Let me play a bit here. I'm really not good at RegEx, but I'll give it
TF a shot:
TF %RegExpMatch="%Text" // The body of the message is our source
TF Match algorithm:
TF 1.) Find "@" character
TF 2.) Return the string consisting of all characters between the space
TF preceding this character and the space or cr following this character.
TF Give me a little time (couple of days should do) to put this into a
TF RegEx script. ;-)
JA I already did this one some time ago. If I remember correctly, the
JA best one was:
JA
%TO=''%TO='%SETPATTREGEXP="(?is).*?[^-_.\w]*?([-_.\w]{2,}?@[-_.\w]{3,}?)[^-_.\w]"%REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%TEXT"%SUBPATT="1"'
JA It finds the first e-mail address in any message.
Ok, tnx. But where I have to put that code in The Bat??? I am new...
--
Emmanuele
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Filter question
Ciao Andrey, Thursday, January 11, 2001, 6:53:27 AM, hai scritto: AGSAA Hello! AGSAA Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 10:58:55 PM, Emmanuele Vigni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EV I am new. I'd like to know if is it possible, and if yes how, to EV configure The Bat! in order to make a canned reply that captures EV from the body of a received message ONLY the e-mail inserted in it EV and send it as a new message to another address that I specifie. AGSAA So does the messages to be processed by that filter contains *only* the AGSAA e-mail addresses you want to extract or there are some additional (and AGSAA unwanted) text in them? There is also unwanted text in them, but only one email to capture.. -- Emmanuele Vigni - System/Network Administrator Phenix by Tecno Net S.r.l. gruppo Grenzor S.p.a. via Roma 33 - 31033 Castelfranco Veneto (TV) Tel. 0423 498446 - Fax. 0423 491464 Happy Slackware user! -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: filter question
Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:34:12 AM, you wrote: T I'm a relative newbie to The Bat, but I believe all you would have to T do is set one incoming and one outgoing filter to move the messages to T your folder. This would be extremely easy if these messages are from T the same correspondent because you could simply use their name/email T as the search string (one sender, one recipient). At least, that's T how I understand it, unless I misunderstood your question (which is T entirely possible). G replying to myself I meant Replied Messages filter, not Outgoing... although Outgoing would probably work too. In fact, if you wanted to keep copies of messages you wrote new, not just replies, you'd want to use the Outgoing filter instead. But if all you wanted to move was replies, then the Replied Messages filter would be more efficient. -- Take care, Travis -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: filter question
Wednesday, October 27, 1999 Hello Soth, Tuesday, Tuesday, October 26, 1999, you wrote: Soth At 9:49:41 PM on Monday, October 25, 1999, your quill inscribed unto the ether: Now all of the remaining messages (which end up unfiltered in my INBOX) I would like deleted from the server. I created a filter rule called "clean up server" and placed this filter last on my list of filters. The search criteria is *.* and the action is delete from server. Is this the correct way to accomplish my task? Soth I can't attest to whether or not that is the "correct" way. But I do Soth know that searching for "@" in the sender works. ;-) (that's what I used Soth for the longest time.) So presumably searching in sender or receiver for @ and if not there means we can get rid of another load of spam which doesnt have a sender or receiver. I just changed mine to dump stuff incoming to the spam folder before I switch it to deleting without showing me... First a look if innicent bystanders get hit... Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.36 mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTE: 1 MAILRUN PER DAY ONLY -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
