Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 5 (RC5) Available Now!
Thanks Andre! So far RC5 works fine for me, it fixes the selinux issue on x86_64[1] and saving traceback to bugzilla problem[2]. So anyone wants to try it, go ahead and help testing! Thanks! Hurry [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730863 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730887 On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 19:49 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: **IMPORTANT** : The next Fedora 16 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting is in less than 24 hours - Wednesday, August 17, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) so the Alpha test cases (see below) would need to be done by then. Thanks. As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 5 (RC5) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. In general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below for updates. When they appear, the download directory should be the same as that for install images, except with the trailing /Fedora/ replaced by /Live/. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. task#23: Create Fedora 16 Alpha release candidate (RC) - live and traditional https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4859 F16 Alpha Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713560 F16 Alpha Nice-To-Have tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713563 [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Anaconda is forcing GPT on non-EFI BIOS
It's probably by design as I looked up the anaconda/changes page[1] and found two features related: * x86 uses GPT disklabels by default on all machines, even non-EFI. * If a GPT boot disk is used on a non-EFI machine, a warning will be displayed. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Changes Hurry On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 00:54 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 21:05 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: On 08/02/2011 08:52 PM, David Cantrell wrote: On 08/02/2011 02:52 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: On 08/02/2011 07:45 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: On 08/02/2011 07:36 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: Hello, snip I found some good info here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694808 Correct. There's no forcing by us, your hardware forced us to use GPT because of the size of its disk. If you have a UEFI-capable system, I suggest using it in UEFI mode. Weird because it was a KVM guest with 32G disk If you didn't already, can you file a bug on this? Seems a blogger hit the same thing, and has been confused into thinking GPT is default for Fedora 16: http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2011/08/08/feature-preview-of-fedora-16-installer/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: skip Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Thanks Andre. I noticed the security lab test page doesn't contain a link to the spins for testing ever since TC1 cycle. Anyone knows please add the url to the above run page so that others can test? Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Anaconda: LUKSError: luks device not configured
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: Downloaded Fedora 16 Alpha TC1 netinstall iso x86_64 for a first brief look. Booted the included isolinux kernel+initrd. Cancelled the first LUKS passphrase prompt, but entered the passphrase for an experimental /home LV, which is shared by several dist releases on this machine. Had to enter it a second time before the installer would continue (uh?). After choosing Create custom layout, Anaconda re-examined the devices once more, then crashed: LUKSError: luks device not configured Please file it. Trying to Save the backtrace, I encountered additional problems, apparently failing (silently?) to enable a network device, mouse pointer animation didn't stop spinning, and Cannot connect to Gnome keyring daemon appeared, also on a virtual console. I'll retry the installation during the day a few more times. The backtrace saving problem is a known bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692433 Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: using dl instead of serverbeach1 for test matrix page download links
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 00:31 +, Andre Robatino wrote: After discussing with smooge and nirik on #fedora-admin, decided to change the 16 Alpha TC1 test matrix pages to use dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1.fp.o and alt.fp.o for download links. If no problems are seen, the template pages can be changed to make it permanent. This would eliminate up to an hour's delay due to the mirroring from dl to serverbeach1. The latter is still operating as a mirror and will be available in case there are problems using dl. Gotcha, Thanks for informing. Cheers, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RE: [Fedora QA] #217: Check install process runs unattended in kickstart install validation test case
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:45 +0800, He Rui wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
Comment:
Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test like：
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_Http_Server_Ks_Cfg
The added expected result is: [[BR]]
# Anaconda should not prompt for user interaction if ks.cfg is not
specified
It seems to me that if you don't specify a ks.cfg Anaconda is going to do
a whole bunch of prompting. Am I missing something?
That's right, what I was trying to say is if the ks.cfg is intact or if
you don't intend to ignore something in the file, Anaconda should not
prompt for user interaction. Sorry for the poor description. I might
correct the above to:
# Anaconda should not prompt for user interaction if the ks.cfg is
intact
Feel free to adjust the words.
I'd probably avoid getting too specific about what kickstart commands
are used for this test. That seems like a good exercise for future
tests, or amendments to existing tests. The general idea of honoring
the provided commands seems sane.
Howabout rephrasing as ... ?
# The installer honors the kickstart commands provided in the
{{filename|ks.cfg}} file. If sufficient commands are provided to fully
automate an installation, the installer must not prompt for user input.
Much better, thanks!
Hurry
--
Contacts
Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Proposed Alpha criteria adjustments
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote: Greetings, During the second Alpha blocker review meeting [1], I took an action item to propose several adjustments to the release criteria. Because of bug#723144, it was agreed that the existing installer partitioning-related Alpha criteria could be adjusted slightly to accommodate the new [ ] Use LVM? option. The criteria in their current state is included below. The installer must be able to complete an installation using the entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions methods, with or without encryption enabled I propose the following minor adjustment to the above criteria: The installer must be able to complete an installation using the entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions methods, with or without encryption or LVM enabled. Looks great, I updated the ext4 partitioning accordingly as well: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_ext4_rootfs_on_disk_partition Thanks, Hurry -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Validation testing extension: security and base testing
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 17:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey, folks. Today's validation testing extension day: I've put the base validation process into 'production', and Athmane's done the same for the security lab spin validation process. Changes involve the SOP: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/SOP_Release_Validation_Test_Event the new templates themselves: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_results_template https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Security_Lab_validation_results_template and for Base validation, I added a test plan page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing I also did a bit of clean up on the SOP and some categorization on all the release validation related pages, to make them a bit more orderly. There are now categories for desktop validation and base validation, as well as the previously-existing install validation category: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Base_validation_testing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Desktop_validation_testing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Install_Test and there's a master 'release validation' category: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Release_validation Wow, thanks for making it so clear and directional, Adam. Under the Install_Test category, I made a little modification to add a subcategory: Category:Install_Test_Plans, as the install tests also has test plans for each release. Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Release criteria updates: genericizing!
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:39 -0400, James Laska wrote: Thanks for the feedback! Some follow-up below... On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:46 -0400, James Laska wrote: Greetings testers, I've been playing with some ideas on how to allow secondary architectures to leverage the primary release criteria. I have some ideas/challenges that I'll send to the list for feedback later. However, in preparation for those ideas/concerns, I'd like to propose several changes to the release criteria. The proposed changes are intended to make the existing criteria slightly more generic, without losing their meaning. Additionally, I've made a few other minor changes and added a few questions. Please take a few minutes to review the proposed changes (highlighted in red at the links below). If nothing alarming surfaces during review, I'll proceed with operation genericize [1] early next week. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Alpha_criteria_revision I'm unclear on the addition of the word 'package' to 2: what does this clarify? What is the other type of install if not a 'package install'? Deleting CD, sure. Yeah, deleting the CD's for one. It's technically not needed, but we have a lot of users that boot a DVD, and install from the online repositories. I was trying to articulate that this only applies to packages from the media. But perhaps that's redundant after saying media-based install? On the deletion of the 'primary architectures' mention from 4: we should probably replace this with something in the preamble, similar to what's there for 'release-blocking desktops'. I was hoping to avoid too much preamble, since for me, the eye really draws to the bullet list, and not the preamble. The deletion was going to be accompanied with my other ideas for secondary architecture handling. But I decided to break that up into two parts, so for now I'll back out that change. Are we at the point where we need to create a section called 'Assumptions', which would include release-blocking desktops and primary architectures? On 7: Not sure about this - I think booting from boot.iso and then using the DVD as a package source is explicitly supported, isn't it? Was this criterion meant to ensure that works? Good discussion. I was trying to bring the criteria closer to what we actually test (fedora-qa) and maintain (anaconda-devel). Booting the boot.iso with askmethod, then installing from the DVD is a use case that we don't explicitly test and I wasn't intended with the original criteria, and we'd be hard-pressed to get fixes for. I discussed this use case in #anaconda ... while we don't explicitly prevent a user from doing this, there is no logical use case to do this. They requested rephrasing the criteria to explicitly mention booting, and installing from, the DVD. Then the default DVD install can cover this criteria or we need to add the askmethod, repo=[1] and graphically adding DVD repo[2] tests? I think it's very rare to use the latter options when already installing from DVD. In addition, there's no criteria referring to 'preupgrade from order release test'[3] yet, should it be put into beta 11.[4] or the final criteria? Thanks, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_repository_DVD_variation [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_repository_DVD_graphical [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_from_older_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Beta_criteria_revision -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Mediawiki 1.16 ref tag syntax change breaks Result template
Oh, I noticed it yesterday as well. I just modified the 'name' a bit to include letters. It seems work now.:) Thanks, Hurry On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 01:15 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: Hello testers, Mediawiki 1.16 ref tag syntax has changed a bit [1], this breaks Result template see[2] eg: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Day:2011-06-08_IPv6#Problems_Identified [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Cite_errors/Cite_error_ref_numeric_key [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Result -- Athmane Madjoudj -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Draft btrfs testcase
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:26 -0400, John Dulaney wrote: I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumption that it will be default for F16. I'd appreciate any additions or suggestions for addition. Note that it isn't finished yet, I'm just done for the day. John. (1) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_btrfs Hi John, What's this test for? If you want to cover the general case, there's a test case for default partitioning no matter it's lvm of btrfs: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install And if you want it be specific to btrfs, a lvm case is for your reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PartitioningRootfsOnLvmDevice Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: pre tags are not rendered correctly in some test-cases pages
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:57 +, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: On 06/01/2011 01:51 PM, James Laska wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:04 +, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: On 06/01/2011 02:00 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: ... SNIP ... I've made those changes to the pages you highlighted. Thanks for raising this issue. I've fixed the following pages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Django_smoketest https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_nfs_connectathon https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_nfs_connectathon_secure https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_cli -- Athmane Madjoudj Thanks for noticing it, I've also reviewed the install tests and fixed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/KickstartKsHttpServerKsCfg https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PackageSetsMinimalPackageInstall https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/KickstartKsFilePathKsCfg https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_URL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_installation_source https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_local_media Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: DVD F14 - F15 Problems
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 13:44 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: I upgraded to F15 from F14 using the DVD yeterday. I experienced a few glitches: 1. I was not asked to include the updates repository during the update process. Sad. Now I will have to do an update after first boot. 2. This is apparently a general problem not really related to the specific upgrade. I noticed that the upgrade process was slow. The disk just churned forever. After booting for the first time, I ran yum erase on my debuginfos so that the subsequent yum update would not pull those in. This erase command took way too long. I think the rpm database gets into a state that needs attention. This fixed it: sudo rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db.001 /var/lib/rpm/__db.002 \ /var/lib/rpm/__db.003 /var/lib/rpm/__db.004 sudo rpm --rebuilddb After that, yum operations sped up an order of magnitude. 3. The first boot ended at multiuser.target instead of graphical.target. When I entered the command sudo systemctl isolate graphical.target kdm came up and allowed a normal desktop login. Hmmm. I compared another system that I upgraded using preupgrade and that one had the correct graphical.target file linked in /etc/systemd/system . So I had to do this to correct the problem: sudo rm /etc/systemd/system/default.target sudo ln -s /lib/systemd/system/runlevel5.target \ /etc/systemd/system/default.target I don't know why this happened with the DVD upgrade and not with the preupgrade upgrade. Was your default init level on Fedora-14 3? Then if you changed the default runlevel by modifying the file /etc/inittab, those changes wouldn't affect the configured systemd default target. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F15_bugs#Graphical_login_does_not_start_after_upgrade Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: DVD F14 - F15 Problems
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 13:50 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: On Sunday, May 29, 2011 13:44:56 Garry T. Williams wrote: I upgraded to F15 from F14 using the DVD yeterday. I experienced a few glitches: 6. Oh, I forgot to mention that there was no operating system log after the upgrade. That one was fixed with this: sudo systemctl enable rsyslog.service -- Thanks, it's a known issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699198 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] F-15 Final RC3 Validation Test Recap
Greetings testers, Three Final Release candidates were posted recently, and validation tests were heavily executed from RC1 to RC3 to verify that they meet the final release criteria[1]. The FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting will be held later today based on the status of RC3, whose validation test results were summarized as below: Install * * F-15-NTH(657621): 699198 ON_QA - rsyslogd not enabled after upgrade -- no logging in /var/log/messages * Warnings: 679709 NEW - Unable to retrieve ftp repository unless adding a http repo first 585006 NEW - syslinux's isohybrid utility creates ISOs that don't conform to ISO 9660 standard (incorrect Volume Space Size), affects Fedora's netinst and live images 704992 ASSIGNED - Root partition size warning only at 250MB Desktop * * F-15-NTH(657621): 697834 NEW - Other menu appears in default installation (any .desktop entry with Category=Settings ends up here (even if there's also Category=System)) * Warnings: 705217 NEW - xscreensaver has no screensavers in F15 LXDE 265350[*] - Can't extend panel to full screen size when multiple monitors are different sizes For detailed results, please refer to the result pages[2]. In addition, special thanks to robatino for his great leadership and the ones who participated in final RC1/RC2/RC3 testing, I hereby listed individual test contributions during the RC tests(aka the number of submit results and the contributor's ID) we really appreciated: 147 robatino 21 athmane 10 jdulaney 1 cpuobsessed 1 pjones If your bug(or name btw:)) is not listed, next time please remember to mark your results onto the result page so that we can collect your data and keep tracking your issues. Thanks! Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Final_Release_Criteria [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_15_Final_RC_Test_Results [*] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265350 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 01:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 05/16/2011 01:02 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote: After several false tries, I did get a DVD which upgraded my previous release candidate (from preupgrade on F140, or said it had. Fwiw, the situation is unchanged, despite that an daily yum updates: it can launch and run KDE4, but Gnome gets only a drawing with a computer frowning. Is there a bug report associated with this problem? Hardware details? Did you try with a new user? Do you have any extensions installed? Also can you check dconf version, is it dconf-0.7.5-1 as expected? Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F13-F15 PreUpgrade test PASSED
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:27 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
Hello,
Here's my test result of PreUpgrading from F13 to F15, I've also updated
F15RC3 test result wiki page.
System: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Athmane/Fedora_Testing
Test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_from_older_release
Result: PASSED
Details:
- System boot and halt correctly.
- Network configuration is the same.
- yum and rpm are working.
- Postfix and OpenSSH server are running.
Notes:
Since F13 use PAE kernel by default, when I preugraded I get the same
F15 version of PAE kernel.
I you need the standard kernel, install it after the preupgrade, then
edit grub.conf to make it default, reboot and now you can remove
'kernel-PAE' (you can't remove the current running kernel with yum).
# yum -y install kernel
# edit grub.conf
# reboot
# yum -y remove kernel-PAE
--
Athmane Madjoudj
RHCE
Thanks for testing, Athmane! I've seen your report on the current result
page[1] as well. I removed each '{{result|none}}' before your results
(such as '{{result|pass|athmane}}'), and feel free to just replace it by
your actual results in future tests. :)
Cheers,
Hurry
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Final_RC3_Install
--
Contacts
Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: no GDM after preupgrade from F14 -- help!
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 09:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 08:42 +0300, cornel panceac wrote: Following up on my post: I booted into run level 3 and did a yum update. It found 12 packages to install, 184 to update, and 12 to remove. One or more of those updates did the trick. this happened to me yesterday, after installing fresh from rc3 dvd, x86. video card is geforce 6150, but maybe it's just something that gets fixed at first boot and reboot was required. so i'm not sure if the updates fixed it. This is the known blocker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704042 , fixed by dconf-0.7.5-1.fc15. Yeah, I hit the same issue after preupgrading, updating dconf fixed it. -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 2 (RC2) Available Now!
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 04:33 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 2 (RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. F15 Final Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=617261 X fails to start is NOT fixed in the RC2 image (DVD install). Did someone not arrange to push the dconf fix? It's fixed in RC2. It already includes dconf-0.7.5-1. Did you use the correct image? Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
Thanks, and notice that X would fail to start after DVD default install, see the bug for more info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704042 Hurry On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 05:51 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote: Great! I will do some desktop testing like last time. - Original Message - On 05/11/2011 03:27 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test swnip x86_64 dvd iso is missing. -- Regards, OldFart -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F15 TC1 dvd (from usb) installer failing : no network available
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 12:26 +0530, Pratyush Sahay wrote: Hello, Tried installing F15 TC1 from a USB DVD media, created using UNetBootin from F15-i386-dvd.iso image. The installer exits after the Boot Loader OS list step, the error being shown : No Network Available.. some of the software repos require networking, but there was an error enabling the network on your system It seemed that even if you used DVD.iso to create the bootable USB, the USB still acted as a netinst.iso without a usable package repo. Did you use UNetBootin on previous releases for DVD install? From its website[1], I found that UNetBootin only supports Live CD and Net install for USB, but no DVD. Am behind our insti's ntlm proxy, so even pluging-in the ethernet cable didnt help.. Screenshot link : http://goo.gl/DlwgA Requiring the network is expected for a net install. As a workaround, if you can't connect to internet during install, you can input 'askmethod' as kernel parameter. When prompted, select Hard drive as your installation source. Then select the disk partition that houses your DVD iso image. Thanks, Hurry [1] http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] F-15 Final TC1 Validation Test Recap
Greetings testers, Final TC1 was online at the beginning of this week, and validation tests were under executing during the week. It's exciting to see that less and less issues were identified from previous candidates to the current, hereby the test results were summarized as below: ** Install ** * F15Blocker(617261): 701622 ON_QA - libproxy.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 701648 ON_QA - firstboot-text.service doesn't honor console=ttyS0 and instead displays on tty0, preventing serial login * Warnings: 702137 NEW - F15-Final-TC1 - NFS x86_64 install fails (i386 works) 585006 NEW - syslinux's isohybrid utility creates ISOs that don't conform to ISO 9660 standard (incorrect Volume Space Size), affects Fedora's netinst and live images ** Desktop *** * F15Blocker(617261): 697834 NEW - Other menu appears in default installation 698603 MODIFIED - [abrt] caribou-0.2.00-1.fc15: main.py:55:__init__:Exception: AT-SPI 1 or 2 needs to be enabled. * F15-NTH(657621): 702480 NEW - [abrt] sugar-browse-120-3.fc15: activitybundle.py:70:__init__:MalformedBundleException: No activity.info file * warnings: Bug 265350[*] - Can't extend panel to full screen size when multiple monitors are different sizes 698556 NEW - Bluetooth can't find any device For detailed results, please refer to the result pages[1]. In addition, special thanks to robatino for his great leadership and the ones who participated in final TC1 testing, I hereby listed individual test contributions(aka the number of submit results and the contributor's ID) we really appreciated: 46 robatino 2 ajwerkman 1 pjones 1 hedayat If your bug(or name btw:)) is not listed, next time please remember to mark your results onto the result page so that we can collect your data and keep tracking your issues. Thanks! Hurry [*] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265350 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_15_Final_TC_Test_Results -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: easier way for deltaiso users to deal with the xz compression change
Hi Andre, Thanks for the deltaiso executable, it works great. From the notes on 'what to test' part[1], I spent some time reading the explanation from the two mails you linked to finally find these executables. Then I think if it would be more convenient if there's a direct link to them saying that people who use F-15 deltaisos on F-14 system need them? And the explanation can be put into delta iso page[2] as you've already done. How do you think? Thanks, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_15_Install_Results_Template#What_To_Test [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Delta_ISOs On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 05:12 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: Previously I posted instructions for temporarily upgrading the xz compression on a F14 box to be able to work with deltaisos for F15 and later: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-February/097009.html Michael Young's method at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-April/098540.html is much nicer, since not only is it simpler (at least if you've used rpmbuild a little), but once you create the executable, you can just use it on your existing system without changing packages. I've posted executables at http://robatino.fedorapeople.org/deltaiso_executables/ so you can either use these, or roll your own. See the README concerning the version (f14 vs. f15). Most people will need the f15 version. The f14 versions are only for someone running F15 or later and needing to use a diso for F14 or below, which is uncommon. Of course, if you are using F14 or below and need to use a diso for F14 or below, or using F15 or above and need to use a diso for F15 or above, then just use the deltaiso package from the Fedora repos. sha256 checksums: d1a9c980404059b1fa93a0cebe00e0d17eb49c1a0782433b9e82157f4adcdf6d applydeltaiso_f14_i686_staticliblzma 23893d6f633644006b18a03c01ef4560fc8536d73f2e7712fc9736c24dc55818 makedeltaiso_f14_i686_staticliblzma 185c19740be3ed108780c1be9954aade8891841fb88006bce98ce7f5137707c1 applydeltaiso_f14_x86_64_staticliblzma 765d6d302ada19cfdbe38e7c8012cf915235791cf54c515150422a9d0059f811 makedeltaiso_f14_x86_64_staticliblzma 98ba3875e76c9a0d54a71158efa2b366c7410170261b6fe64484fc3149840708 applydeltaiso_f15_i686_staticliblzma 91e25cca3982cbf0ef72123703a9afded3c8f7ec41738cc7dce2c98c5b06c576 makedeltaiso_f15_i686_staticliblzma 702e30d7e90af66edbc693426b482ee1c79257acf37dc21a6bfb40c6c1bbe7e7 applydeltaiso_f15_x86_64_staticliblzma c7f5f0b047dd5d1d0c8315070ee09e691fc1ee016fbd13cbbead3330477216f8 makedeltaiso_f15_x86_64_staticliblzma -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] F-15 Beta RC2 Validation Test Recap
Greetings testers, As you've known that Beta has been declared gold, validation tests were being executed to guarantee that Beta RC2 could finally meet the beta release criteria[1]. During the tests, as expected, no beta blockers were found and the results were summarized as below: Installation * F15Beta-NTH(657619): 692135 ON_QA - Image failed media check * F15Blocker(617261): 695280 NEW - Installer unable to find correct dvd from nfsiso repository containing a set of images 696320 NEW - After text-mode iSCSI install and boot, firstboot-text and getty are both running - unable to login on console * Warnings: 695054 NEW - Fail to exercise the addition of a FTP-based package repository during installation. 585006 NEW - syslinux's isohybrid utility creates ISOs with incorrect ISO size in their header (affects Fedora's netinst and live images) Desktop Bug 265350[*] - Can't extend panel to full screen size when multiple monitors are different sizes In addition, special thanks to robatino for his great leadership and the ones who participated in Beta testing, I hereby listed individual test contributions(aka the number of submit results and the contributor's ID) which we really appreciated: * Beta_TC1+RC1+RC2_Install: 120 robatino 9 redwolfe 6 ajwerkman 5 bsfmig 1 cpuobsessed * Beta_TC1_RC1+RC2_Desktop: 20 cra 9 vhumpa 1 jreiser If your bug(or name btw:)) is not listed, next time please remember to mark your results onto the result page so that we can collect your data and keep tracking your issues. See ya in pre-final tests! Thanks, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Beta_Release_Criteria [*] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265350 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: some issues with 15 Beta RC2 Live Desktop CD
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 03:48 +, Andre Robatino wrote: 1) In the boot menu, there is a Verify and Boot option, but I didn't see any evidence of a verify being done. I know that the netinst install disc no longer has a mediacheck. Is this also true for live images? If a verify is being done, the user should know it. If not, the Verify and Boot menu item should be removed. I'll file a bug either way. 2) In attempting to test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:TestCases/Install_Source_Live_Image in a VM (both VirtualBox and KVM) there are no desktop icons at all, so in particular it's impossible (or at least not obvious how) to install to hard drive. In the fallback mode, though there's no 'install to hard drive' icon on desktop, it can be found from Applications-System Tools. Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Beta RC1 Available Now!
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:40 +0600, Angel wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available for testing. Did this version include the latest GNOME 3 which released on 6th? It includes gnome-shell and mutter 3.0 version[1]. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-3.0.0-1.fc15,mutter-3.0.0-1.fc15,empathy-3.0.0-1.fc15,telepathy-glib-0.14.3-1.fc15,telepathy-logger-0.2.8-1.fc15?_csrf_token=f5fed8411ffe9824125b8be872471f75fb687c67 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Beta RC1 Available Now!
Thank you, Andre. On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 23:38 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Welcome everyone to add your results to the above pages to extend the coverage of the tests. Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for installation [2] and desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [4]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test list [6]. F15 Beta Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=657618 F15 Beta Nice-To-Have tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=657619 Also pay more attention to the beta blockers and NTH when testing the images. [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-15/f-15-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Beta_Release_Criteria [5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Beta RC1 Available Now!
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 22:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 23:38 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Heads up on this: the installer crashes on run on the live images: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694712 I'll try and get that looked at and get a fix in ASAP tomorrow. I haven't tested the DVD or boot.iso yet. Boot.iso works smoothly so far. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test day(Mar 17) Recap
Greetings testers, Thanks for your involvement and attention on this test event. During that day preupgrade-1.1.9-1 was built on time for testing, for most testers, preupgrading went on smoothly before encountering the lorax issue[1]. The bugs filed were summarized here: Bug 688761 - NEW - preupgrade - 2011-03-17 Testday for Preupgrade failure for f14-f15 Bug 684742 - ASSIGNED - lorax - glibc dynamic library loading bug causes installs to fail Bug 635432 - NEW - yum - UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe4' in position 6: ordinal not in range(128) The common use cases for preupgrade have been covered and the test results of this package is positive. For detailed results, please refer to the test day page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-17_Preupgrade Thanks, Hurry [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684742 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day Tomorrow(Mar 17)
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote:Let me point to Bugzilla #684054. The F-14 preupgrade isn't patched yet, where can we find a fixed one? Nevermind. I read the Wiki and found the koji pointer. Yeah, the new packages with patches are linked to the test day page, and the bug for tracking this is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646843 Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day Tomorrow(Mar 17)
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 18:30 +0800, He Rui wrote: On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote:Let me point to Bugzilla #684054. The F-14 preupgrade isn't patched yet, where can we find a fixed one? Nevermind. I read the Wiki and found the koji pointer. Yeah, the new packages with patches are linked to the test day page, and the bug for tracking this is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646843 And testers would probably encounter this bug when starting anaconda 15.20.1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684742 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day Tomorrow(Mar 17)
Greetings everyone, Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow! It's available at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current As you've noticed that install.img is included in initrd.img From F-15 builds, the procedure of preupgrade need be changed accordingly. Therefore, packages with patches to make it working are prepared for testing on this test day. So testers, if you used to upgrade your system by preupgrade or are interested in it, feel free to join this test day tomorrow. Remember to post your results on wiki and discuss your problems in #fedora-test-day(freenode). See you there!:) -- Contacts FAS name: Rhe IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa Email: r...@redhat.com ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Proposed must-have Features for Nitrate compared with Wiki
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:23 -0400, James Laska wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 17:06 +0800, He Rui wrote: On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:19 -0500, James Laska wrote: On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 18:01 +0800, He Rui wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, James Laska wrote: snip I meant in nitrate, there's only a 'Notes' field to support a simple summary of each test run. For a test day which has many contents[1] such as What to test, Prerequisite for Test Day, How to test etc, it is hard to put all of these into the 'Notes' field. This field doesn't support TinyMCE or any other syntax editing. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days/Template Oh I see. My initial thought is this might be more of a nice-to-have feature, and possibly out of scope for the initial effort. Either way, I would say not a MUSTHAVE requirement. To me, anything content related should be left to the wiki ... the wiki does an outstanding job in this regard. Anything related to test cases and test results, should be managed by nitrate (or something similar). I see. Today I talked with TCMS members, they said they could support TinyMCE syntax editing to the 'Notes' area. Therefore we can either achieve this by a link to wiki or edit it in 'Notes' field. Okay snip Since it's internally use only, the permissions only have three: 1. anonymous - read. 2. tester - read and write any case/run/plan. 3. Admin - manage the tcms system. Correction. Testers have not only read and write any case/run/plan permission but also site/management administrations. Admin has Authentication permission besides what testers have. Should we add this to the musthave requirements list. Support for anonymous read/write *and* FAS integration? Sure, I've written them down. Thanks 7. Result type - Nitrate doesn't have 'warn' but has 'error' result status. Modify it to 'warn'? What is the significance of 'error' in nitrate? Does that mean there was a test case error, not necessarily a software error? It presents an environment error, the user guide suggesting the use of result status is: Idle - Default value. The Test Case has not been examined. Passed - Test Case met all the expected results. Failed - Test Case did not meet all the expected results, or produced an unhandled exception. Running - Test Case is in progress. Paused - This status is used to denote a problem with the test case itself that prevents the test from being completed. Blocked - Test Case has a dependency that has failed. Error - Test environment has problems that prevent Test Case execution. But I guess such 'error' status will be seldom used. Yeah, probably. I can see the case for warn, but warn really just means the test passed, but bugs were discovered during execution of the test but did not impact the outcome of the test. Yeah, then let's add another 'warn' status? In my opinion, that can be a nice-to-have feature, but not a requirement. Unless I'm wrong, we use WARN to note that the test passed, but other bugs were discovered while executing the test. That same information can be supplied in nitrate by marking the test PASS, and linking to additional bugs filed. Seems like we can convey the same information without adding a new STATE. Okay, that makes sense. Will see if there's any problem when using it in a pilot instance. snip Oh, how does nitrate designate the site admin and test run admins? So far there are two user groups: admin and tester. Both of them have the permission for site admin and test run admins. Okay, that works. It sounds like admin and tester have the same Are they single persons, or is it a user group (aka FAS group)? I think we'll want to ability to designate multiple (but few) site admins (SHOULDHAVE), and need the ability to have multiple admins for test runs (MUSTHAVE). If it only supports one user being listed as the administrator, we'll want to review what types of tasks that restricts (add tests to the run, new runs etc...). I was told that they are working on multiple site admins and multiple admins for different groups by trying to integrate with another system which is not open source. The TCMS members informed the FAS system are investigating it. Okay. snip I know you mention anonymous login support above, can you also list FAS authentication? Apologies if I missed it already. Do you mean integration with FAS? Yes please. Apologies if that was already listed, I may have missed it. It's listed. I see it now, thanks! Based on the discussion, I've updated the requirement page[1] with solution field added. When these requirements are filed to bugzilla, I will add bug no. to each one for tracking
Re: Proposed must-have Features for Nitrate compared with Wiki
Hi Danqing, Many thanks for replying this mail. On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 16:59 +0800, Danqing Li wrote: Hi ,thank you very much for this great feature requirement list. On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:01 PM, He Rui wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, James Laska wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:06 +0800, He Rui wrote: Greetings, Now let's continue the discussion[1] about TCMS management. After the feature comparison between wiki and nitrate, the features which are supported in current wiki, but not in nitrate have been identified[2]. Among these, I priorized some of them as Must-have features, which were summarized as below[3]: 1. History rollback - User can view history versions and undo changes. Good, I do use this more often than I realize. 2. History comparison - Different versions can compare with each other. Yes , after talk with Hurry I understand this is very important for community cooperation testing. But the implementation of roll back of test case is really not easy . In development of 3.4 and 3.5 we plan to improve history function of test plan/case/run, show the edit history of every field. And in fact there has change log for test case. I see, if this is a difficult task, IMO we can achieve this step by step. 3. Description part in test case - Currently there's no 'Description' part for test case format on Nitrate, should we add this part or use 'Setup' part instead? No, I don't think 'setup' is the right place since we also use 'setup' in our wiki test template. Does nitrate support a summary or any other field to describe the intent of the test in human readable terms? Oh, it has Notes area, maybe we can use that. Ok , let me know if you have other requirement about this 'Notes' field. Thanks for supporting, at a first thought, we may want the tinyMCE syntax for it. 4. Grouping cases (by media) - Need a way to separate the cases to different groups in one test run. How can we achieve this in Nitrate? Probably different test runs of the same plan. One run would be for the DVD ISO, one for the netinst.iso etc... Perhaps this will need further exploration. Yeah, use different test runs or sorting the cases by order. 5. Documents in test result page(Run) - There's only a little space called 'Note' for documentation on Nitrate and it doesn't support syntax. should we ask for more spaces with syntax supported for test runs like test days? Can you explain in more detail? Are you proposing we move the test day wiki content into nitrate, so it's a one-stop-shop for test information for that event? I meant in nitrate, there's only a 'Notes' field to support a simple summary of each test run. For a test day which has many contents[1] such as What to test, Prerequisite for Test Day, How to test etc, it is hard to put all of these into the 'Notes' field. This field doesn't support TinyMCE or any other syntax editing. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days/Template I see that Test Day is a very good cooperation testing activity. I think you can use Test Plan to describe the Test Day Document instead of Test Run. The organizer write all information above in Test Plan document. And put test cases into this plan. On that day ,every tester could make a new run for himself/ herself . I user Nitrate made a test plan to simulate fedora test day on Feb25, please see the attached screenshot. In this way , information could be stored in plan documents, and test result in every test runs. Wow, good idea. Make a plan for each test day first, then include test cases to the plan and create a run. I will try this when setting up a test instance later.:) But now Nitrate can't supply the matrix test result show all user's result like the wikipage[1]. We need talk about the test result report feature in future development. 6. Moving test results - Moving previous results from a test run to another. AFAIK, there's no way to copy some of one test run results to another. Good catch. I think with nitrate, you can selectively include test cases when creating a new test run, right? Meaning, we wouldn't need to include *all* tests in the plan when creating a new test run? Yeah. but then we need to make very sure that certain cases results won't be changed in new run. The summary of the new run results is also not intact. Anyway, this is a workaround. This brings up another question ... permissions. With the wiki, anyone has permission to add or remove tests from a test run. How will that be handled in nitrate? Since it's internally use only, the permissions only have three: 1. anonymous - read. 2. tester
Re: Proposed must-have Features for Nitrate compared with Wiki
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:23 -0400, Andrew Ross wrote: Sorry ,I am not clear about the necessity of import result form another test run,is it mean those test run very similar, so why make a new run?Do you explain some more detail about this feature's scenario ? Okay, take F15 Alpha candidate for example. When RC1 is available, its test run is created for testing, if it has some blocker bugs which don't meet release criteria, RC2 with the fixes would be posted for testing. A new test run would be created and the test cases are the same as RC1 run. But for some cases that we assume the fixes won't affect, on wiki, we moved their RC1 results which are supposed to be unchanged directly to the RC2 run, see the example pages[!]. This way, for RC2 run, we have both new tested and moved results, and the cases are intact for each run. [!] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Alpha_RC1_Install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Alpha_RC2_Install Hi Hurry, In this use case are you assuming that there would be no regression bugs between RC1 and RC2? For the test cases with moved results, I'm assuming there would be no regression bugs. But since it's community testing, these tests in each new run(eg RC2) are still open for testing to encourage contributions to cover this area. Cheers, Andrew Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Proposed must-have Features for Nitrate compared with Wiki
Greetings, Now let's continue the discussion[1] about TCMS management. After the feature comparison between wiki and nitrate, the features which are supported in current wiki, but not in nitrate have been identified[2]. Among these, I priorized some of them as Must-have features, which were summarized as below[3]: 1. History rollback - User can view history versions and undo changes. 2. History comparison - Different versions can compare with each other. 3. Description part in test case - Currently there's no 'Description' part for test case format on Nitrate, should we add this part or use 'Setup' part instead? 4. Grouping cases (by media) - Need a way to separate the cases to different groups in one test run. How can we achieve this in Nitrate? 5. Documents in test result page(Run) - There's only a little space called 'Note' for documentation on Nitrate and it doesn't support syntax. should we ask for more spaces with syntax supported for test runs like test days? 6. Moving test results - Moving previous results from a test run to another. AFAIK, there's no way to copy some of one test run results to another. 7. Result type - Nitrate doesn't have 'warn' but has 'error' result status. Modify it to 'warn'? 8. Multiple contributions for each case - Support multiple test results for one case run. 9. Authorities for pages - Pages on wiki with different namespaces can have different permissions, so hopefully pages on Nitrate can also have diff permissions. 10. Supporting anonymous user read-write access - Anonymous have read-write access for specified test runs. 11. Page protection - Protect certain plans/cases 12. License the content - License the contents the same with wiki 13. Upstream project community - Monitoring it and actively discussing topics in nitrate-devel@, as well as file/share bugs/requirements in bugzilla 14. Test day page(run) creation - In Nitrate each test run are built based on its test plan. Therefore, test day plan and its cases are needed before creating a test day run. Should we change our test day process(adding test plan and its cases) or should we change Nitrate to support creating test runs without test plan? 15. Test cases priority - Nitrate now has P1, P2, P3..., modify them to Alpha, Beta, and Final? 16. Each case with different platforms - Better support two platform results(i386 and x86_64) submitting for each case run Welcome to discuss the above features and provide feedback/suggestion. If there's any important feature missed, or this reminds you the advantages of other tcms tools etc, feel free to talk. Thanks, Hurry [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/152 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tcms_Comparison [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tcms_feature_requirements -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Internationalization and Localization Test Days recap
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 15:19 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote: Hello, I'm really glad we successfully finished our internationalization and localization testing marathon for these release cycle. I'm also glad to see that some bugs are already closed or modified. For Fedora 15 the intention was to arrange these Test Days earlier than we did for Fedora 14 because now we can give developers more time to fix those bugs. I want to thank everyone who helped to organize those events and specially the ones from around the world who took some time to test and share the results with us. I know that such efforts are only successful in a worldwide community committed to do a great job. So a big thank you wherever you are! Many thanks for Igor's organization. For testers and users, these L10n/i18n test days are still open for you, welcome to continually use the cases and find more issues. Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha RC#2 Validation Test Recap
Greetings, F-15-Alpha-RC2 was recently online and tested. As expected, the keyboard layout issue, firstboot crash and mesa 32-bit were confirmed fixed in this build. Later Go/No-Go meeting will be held to determine if it meets Alpha release criteria[1]. Here installation and desktop bugs are listed FYI: Installation * * F15Alpha-Proposed(bug#657616): 681167 NEW - Can't log in over serial console 681290 NEW - Can't decrypt filesystem using non-ascii letters * F15Alpha-NTH(bug#657617): 677131 MODIFIED - How to skip update disk prompt * F15Beta(bug#657618): 677953 NEW - Unable to kickstart with ks.cfg file stored on hard drive 646843 NEW - images/install.img will no longer exist in F-15 and newer 678081 ASSIGNED - Updates.img delivery via installation source not working 676968 MODIFIED - system halts after first reboot during kickstart installation 676821 MODIFIED - Couldn't resolve host name when installing packages over NFS 678150 MODIFIED - VNC install w/ password, fails to establish password for VNC session 676815 ON_QA - Upgrade from F14 to F15 Alpha TC1 failed due to package conflicts 678877 ASSIGNED - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'addChild' * F15Blocker(bug#617261): 680876 NEW - Show Fedora installer somewhere 677080 NEW - 'F14' artwork is shown during F-15 installation 676551 MODIFIED - no prompt for mediacheck 678675 MODIFIED - RuntimeError: Unable to locate a needed executable: 'brcm_iscsiuio' 678413 MODIFIED - NFS ISO installs require the presence of .treeinfo * Warnings: 680016 NEW - failed to install from hard drive since package rpm cannot be opened 679466 NEW - KeyError: pyanaconda.yuminstall.AnacondaYumRepo object at 0x7f409f7333d0 679709 NEW - Unable to retrieve ftp repository unless adding a http repo first 585006 NEW - anaconda and livecd-creator are creating i386 and x86_64 ISOs which are larger than indicated by the ISO header 63 MODIFIED - F-15-Alpha DVD install (TC2) prompts for networking at repo step * Desktop * * F15Beta(bug#657618): 681062 NEW - F15 Alpha RC2: broken quicklauncher present in default panel configuration 678402 NEW - F15 livemedia are checking for updates * Warnings: 679452 ASSIGNED - WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:586 proc_register +0x155/0x192() Detailed results can be found here[2]. Special thanks for the result contributions by robatino, redwolfe, oldfart, biertie, red, and jreznik.:) Thanks, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Alpha_Release_Criteria [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_15_Alpha_RC_Test_Results -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha RC#2 Validation Test Recap
On 03/02/2011 08:58 AM, Steven Haigh wrote: This should also be listed as an F15Beta issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678689 In a nutshell, you can't install F15Alpha RC1/2 to an intel IMSM RAID. There should be more F15Beta/F15Blocker install bugs than listed. This summary was generated based on the results posted on the result page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test So next time please record your issues on the page to highlight them. Thanks, Hurry -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] I18n Desktop Test Day Tomorrow (Mar 3)
Greetings everyone! Tomorrow we will continue the localization and internationalization test day focusing on: I18n Desktop[1]. Tests on this day will mainly cover the yum langpack, font/rendering in applications as well as the input method. If you are interested, feel free to post your results on wiki and join us in #fedora-test-day(freenode) to discuss your queries. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-03_I18n_Desktop -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha RC#1 Validation Test Recap
Greetings, Thanks for your attention on F-15 Alpha RC#1 test event. Alpha priority tests and most of other test cases against installation and desktop have been executed and a list of bugs are classified as below: Installation * * F15Alpha-NTH(bug#657617): 677131 MODIFIED - How to skip update disk prompt * F15Beta(bug#657618): 677953 NEW - Unable to kickstart with ks.cfg file stored on hard drive 646843 NEW - images/install.img will no longer exist in F-15 and newer 676968 ASSIGNED - system halts after first reboot during kickstart installation 678081 ASSIGNED - Updates.img delivery via installation source not working 676821 MODIFIED - Couldn't resolve host name when installing packages over NFS 678150 MODIFIED - VNC install w/ password, fails to establish password for VNC session 676815 ON_QA - Upgrade from F14 to F15 Alpha TC1 failed due to package conflicts 677218 CLOSED DUPLICATE - missing iso 9660 image during installation via NFS 676821 MODIFIED - Couldn't resolve host name when installing packages over NFS * F15Blocker(bug#617261): 677080 NEW - 'F14' artwork is shown during F-15 installation 676551 MODIFIED - no prompt for mediacheck 678413 MODIFIED - NFS ISO installs require the presence of .treeinfo * Warnings: 680016 NEW - failed to install from hard drive since package rpm cannot be opened 679709 NEW - Unable to retrieve ftp repository unless adding a http repo first 585006 NEW - anaconda and livecd-creator are creating i386 and x86_64 ISOs which are larger than indicated by the ISO header 63 MODIFIED - F-15-Alpha DVD install (TC2) prompts for networking at repo step 679171 POST - Hitting enter to move to Next screen crashes firstboot 679466 NEW - KeyError: pyanaconda.yuminstall.AnacondaYumRepo object at 0x7f409f7333d0 ** Desktop * None To view the detailed test results, please refer to : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_15_Alpha_RC_Test_Results As you can see that quite a number of bugs exist, but no Alpha blocker bugs were found on this build by executing the cases. Many thanks for the leadership of robatino as well as the participation of jreznik and jaycee. Hope next time there will be more testers providing test results on the pages. :) Cheers, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Booting F15 Alpha TC1 as kvm guest
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 15:39 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: On 02/11/2011 03:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 02/11/2011 03:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Has anyone been able to boot the F15 Alpha TC1 image as a kvm guest? On my CentOS 5.5 host I get some kind of kernel crash. Ah, looks like I was running out of memory. Is it expected to work in 512MB of RAM on x86_64 anymore? I haven't tried it myself yet, but the current testing notes (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test) indicate that 1GB is needed for F15 Alpha TC1. I'm not sure what will be required for the release, though. Tim Yeah, 512M memory is not enough to work as initrd.img includes install.img now. 1G is safe to run the installer. Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 Available Now!
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote: Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1 or should we manually change over to updates-testing? F-15 is supposed to be branched at this time, but currently the default repo is still rawhide. Is branching delayed? Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 Available Now!
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:12 +0100, Christoph Frieben wrote: 2011/2/10 Andre Robatino: Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 is now available [1]. Beware: unlike the earlier snaphot Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 of last month, the current installer v15.19 will ultimately --abort-- after choosing create custom layout. The particularly unpleasant fact about this is that the installer complains only after formatting system partitions/volumes leaving the user with no system at all. ~C Ref.: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676542 A workaround is here: updates=http://clumens.fedorapeople.org/676032.img from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676032 Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Call for reviewing TCMS use cases and comparison!
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 23:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:02 +, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: I do like litmus! It's a nice evolution from testopia for upstream mozilla. We don't currently have an 'unclear' test result. I'm not opposed to it, but would need better understand how that field is used, and the process around it, in litmus. Agree with James. What I believe Mozilla is doing (since I have not had a chance to work with their QA team yet) is flagging test cases with a form of soft failure in that the result of a testcase neither clearly passed, nor clearly failed. So in addition to Passed, Failed, and any other common states (Blocked, In Progress, etc.) you have an Unclear result state. I didn't receive the mail replied by Samuel. Weird. Hurry is somewhat wrong to say we don't currently have an 'unclear' result; we do have the 'warn' result, which is in some ways similar. We usually use it to indicate when a test turns up some kind of anomalous behaviour which isn't exactly a failure. It depends on what 'unclear' means here and how it reflects the results. If you mean a soft failure or an issue that doesn't block the case run, the 'warn' result is similar to it, then calling it 'unclear' is confusing and not accurate in my opinion. In nitrate system, it has 'blocked', 'failed' and 'error' result status to reflect a problem. User guide suggests 'error' is used for test environment that has problems that prevent Test Case execution. I think we can modify 'error' status to include all soft failures. I've added this to the requirements for further evaluation. Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Call for reviewing TCMS use cases and comparison!
Greetings, Many thanks for Samuel's comments, I found out many valuable things to think, identify and add to use cases/feature comparison. The questions also remind me that many testers so far may be still not familiar with Nitrate, therefore can't give any suggestion upon it. So I'll introduce Nitrate a bit here. Nitrate is a new test case management system which is open-sourced recently. It has advantages on managing, tracking and querying cases,results and is similar to testopia. The introduction pages along with some screenshots can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/nitrate/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Nitrate One can set up a local nitrate system with the steps in the link, we are also planing to build a testing instance during F-15. On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:02 -0500, James Laska wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:03 -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: A few more inline comments on a subset of the questions, and two more thoughts: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:54 AM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 05:54 -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: 1. What is the history of Nitrate and the Fedora Project? What does the Fedora project expect to gain from using it? This goes back to an eval we did using testopia in Fedora many releases agove. Unfortunately, the effort was canceled due to license incompatibility between Fedora and testopia. At that point, we invested in leveraging the wiki to best of our ability. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Testopia+AF8-Evaluation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 From the bug I'm guessing this is because Testopia used Ext-JS, and Ext-JS kept changing licenses. Hopefully there will only be licensing restrictions for Nitrate on the software itself, and not the created work of what one does while actively using it. That was a question I had opened with Hurry. I have no idea how we'd license the content in the system. If anything, I'd hope/expect that to match that of our current wiki. Oh, licensing and license issues. I've listed both of them in feature comparison as requirements. For test days and release validation test events use cases, I identified the steps with different permissions by QA, event host and tester(including anonymous user)[#], and hope this can help to license these instances in Nitrate. Of course, I need to extend more to cover other instances. [#] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_use_cases#Test_Events_Use_Cases 1. How does Nitrate compare to other open closed sourced TCMS solutions? Why was it written as opposed to using an existing solution, and what are its strengths weaknesses? See history comments above. Also, maybe the nitrate developers [1] can offer more insight on how it compares to other open-source solutions? I *think* that comparison work has been done in the past, I'm just not sure where to find the results. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/nitrate-devel Are the developers actively monitoring/using this list? I looked at it before, and all I saw were three test posts from July in the archives. I believe they do, but don't yet have a strong upstream presence since there hasn't been a lot of code/progress to share until recently. This will be something I'm sure they'll want to improve as community interest increases. Add it into requirements. But I can confirm that all the nitrate developers are monitoring the list now. When community interest increases, it will become active. :) 1. Can multiple projects share test cases, and even reference older versions of test cases if they are lagging behind the current rawhide/Fedora release? Will Spins be able to make their own (simultaneously running) test plans? This is the hope. It's not really useful if we can only use it for release validation. I don't think we've fully explored how best to model other spins/projects, but I don't foresee big problems there. That will be fun to explore on the sandbox/staging instance. With regards to referencing older versions of a test case, I believe that support is there, although I'm not certain it's right for our needs. Keeping test documentation (plans and cases) updated is a pretty sizable maintenance challenge. I've seen many instances where support for versioned test cases allows test plans to suffer over time as they were linked against old and inaccurate test cases. Much like how the wiki is used now, we have support for linking against older versions of tests (wiki history), but we rarely ever use that feature. I expect that trend would continue in the short-term. The reason I bring this up is because OLPC's Spin releases tend to lag behind the official Fedora release. For instance, we just released our hopefully
Re: [Test-Announce] Call for reviewing TCMS use cases and comparison!
Please ignore the last mail. Hi James, Wow, firstly, many thanks for your careful review of all the items.:) On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:08 -0500, James Laska wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote: Greetings! Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for organizing the events. Please review it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_use_cases Meanwhile, Wiki and Nitrate comparison is also listed and grouped by above use cases. I've listed as many features as I can think out for comparison. Please have a look and see if any features are missed. You can review it by the use case you're familiar with if reviewing all of them is tough, but be aware that features compared in former use cases are not listed in later cases again to avoid overlaps: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_Comparison Ticket#152[1] is currently set up for tracking this event. Feel free to add comments or discuss it here. Note: the feedback deadline is Jan 21, the end of this week. After that date, I'll move forward to the next phase. Waiting for your feedback! Woah, I like the fancy table layout used for comparing use cases between the wiki and nitrate! Thank you for taking the time to identify our current test workflows and offer a comparison between nitrate and the wiki. You've got a really comprehensive list of use cases that will certainly help us evaluate nitrate. While looking through the comparison wiki, I've noted a few comments/questions below. Hope this helps! I'm unclear what the use case 'Creating A Common Page' is, can you elaborate? Is that when we create a category page to group all test results for a milestone (e.g. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Pre-Alpha_Test_Results)? No, it means creating a general new page on wiki, like a documentation page etc, and test cases/plans/categories/results pages are particular cases based on creating a normal page like this. It lists what a user may do when creating a new page. Under 'creating a common page', the row titled 'Submitting format'. Would that be better named as 'Supports data entry using a form'? Ah great, I've changed it. Under 'creating a common page', there is a row titled 'Subpage using'. I don't think I understand that use case, can you explain? Okay, for example on wiki, Test_Days is under the path of QA like: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days So I tried to compare if nitrate can also organize sub-page under its main page. Under section 'Creating A Test Case', there are some red cells for the wiki for (these are also under 'Creating a Test Plan'). What does the 'red' mean. Does it mean that they are not possible, or that the solution provided is not optimal? Oh the first two below are not optimal, the last one is not possible on wiki. * Renaming a case - move to another page I think moving to another page is not a good way to rename a case, there will be two link addresses for this case. * Case draft status - manually add draft category/note It's better to have a case status called draft, or proposed like nitrate does. * Case review status - approved in ticket or somewhere else Nitrate will send an email including the proposed case id to reviewer for approval. Then the reviewer can set 'confirmed', or 'need update' status. For wiki, I remember we used to track the cases status in tickets and after approved in tickets or reviewed in test@, the 'draft' note is removed, but no sign indicates the case has been reviewed and approved. Also under section 'Creating A Test Case', the row titled 'Test case re-use (write once, link anywhere)' talks about nitrate support for cloning tests. Does this create a new copy of the original, or does it re-use the existing test? If any changes are made to one, are the propagated to the other clone? Nitrate creates new copies, so if any change is made to one, the other clone won't change. Under 'Creating A Test Result Page Template', the row titled 'Group cases (by media)', I imagine nitrate supports other methods of grouping/organizing tests in a test run? Oh wait ... this is grouping, not sorting. How would this be done with nitrate, would a test run be created for each media type? Or would we sort tests of different media types differently? AFAIK, except the above two methods, adding tags to tests and filtering them by tags is another choice. But it requires testers to filter by themselves. So.. I need think about them and compare these methods. Under 'Creating A Test Result Page', the row titled 'Redirecting links' ... is this when a test run has expired, or been replaced by a newer test run? Like if we get RC2, we'll go and adjust RC1 so people know
[Test-Announce] Call for reviewing TCMS use cases and comparison!
Greetings! Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for organizing the events. Please review it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_use_cases Meanwhile, Wiki and Nitrate comparison is also listed and grouped by above use cases. I've listed as many features as I can think out for comparison. Please have a look and see if any features are missed. You can review it by the use case you're familiar with if reviewing all of them is tough, but be aware that features compared in former use cases are not listed in later cases again to avoid overlaps: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_Comparison Ticket#152[1] is currently set up for tracking this event. Feel free to add comments or discuss it here. Note: the feedback deadline is Jan 21, the end of this week. After that date, I'll move forward to the next phase. Waiting for your feedback! Cheers, Hurry [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/152 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: New Tester Introduction
Hi Hongqing, Glad to see you here! I know there maybe many staff for you to learn at the beginning, but based on your background, you'll adapt the environment and 'Fedora QA style' pretty soon. Here are some introduction pages for your reference: [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Is_anaconda_broken_proposal [4] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-15/f-15-quality-tasks.html If you have any concerns/suggestions, feel free to tell or share with us in the list.:) Thanks, Hurry On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 23:30 -0500, Hongqing Yang wrote: Hi guys, This is Hongqing Yang, a new Red Hatter joined the Fedora testing team yesterday. I am based in Beijing, China. I worked in Singapore as a software engineer before joining Red Hat. I started to learn Fedora when I developed a FORTRAN project to do molecular simulation. It is my honour to to join the great team. Now I am familiar with the new environment and learn something in the tesing area. I expect to contribute to the team quickly. At last, Merry Christmas! Wish you everything is fine in the new year! Hongqing Yang -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: New tester looking for a mentor
Hi Chen Gang, Gerard is right, you need double check what he suggested. Btw, you've been well known in the Chinese list already, I've seen they gave you different suggestions and welcomes there[1][2]. Subscribe it and say hello to them! Thanks, Hurry [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/chinese/2010-November/004315.html [2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/chinese/2010-November/004327.html On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 08:17 +0800, Gerard Braad wrote: hi Chen Gang, Activation is automated; please check your spam folder for the subscription to the Chinese list. If you don't have it, I can ativate it for you. If you can't find the email, send me an email off-list and I'll make sure you can post. Kind regards, Gerard -- Gerard Braad — 吉拉德 Project-lead Fedora-MIPS http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:gbraad -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: I'm a newcomer, my name is Chen Gang
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:52 +0800, Chen Gang-Cuble wrote: Hi: I'm a Chinese man, I'm a software engineer. Familiar with C/C++. I have about 7 years experience on software developing. I'm new to Linux. I have read a few books before, but just began to use it a few days ago. I have just learned to add myself to sudoer list:) I'd like to contribute. I think I can begin from test. Is there any suitable job for me? BTW, if there are still a Chen Gang in the project now, please call me Chen Gang-Cuble to identify. You see, there are huge number of Chen Gang in China. Br, Chen Gang Hi Chen Gang, Nice meeting you here! You can start contribute according to your interest as Kamil introduced in another thread. Also, maybe you have known that China has its local fedora community[1] where you can also feel free to share your thoughts/ideas/opinions with other members. Enjoy your testing!:) [1] chin...@lists.fedoraproject.org Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Final RC1 Recap
Greetings, As you can see in the bug list summarized below, Test results of F-14-Final-RC1 are positive so far, no blocker bugs were found when executing the tests. Many thanks for the hard working of developers, rel-engineers, and testers to keep improve the quality of Fedora. = Installation === * F14-accepted: 645645 NEW - Another grub picture is shown before the regular one 646437 MODIFIED - Fail to login to desktop after preupgrading to F14 from F12 * Warnings: 585006 NEW - anaconda and livecd-creator are creating i386 and x86_64 ISOs which are larger than indicated by the ISO header 645660 CLOSED DUPLICATE 645606 - F14 Final RC1 Live does not show gnome background === Desktop = * Warnings: 646041 NEW - Missing OK button 643435 NEW - Automatically unlock function seems break. It always asks password when I'm logged in. For detailed test results, please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Final_RC_Test_Results Also be noticed that Fedora 14 FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting will be held soon today at 21:00 UTC. Stay tuned for this. Many Thanks! Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: QA:Testcase Anaconda save traceback to remote system
On 10/26/2010 07:40 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: - Kamil Paralkpa...@redhat.com wrote: In this test case https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system there's this sentence: # On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from the destination list. However, after hitting Save button, I have following options: scp, local, ftp, bugzilla.redhat.com, (Cancel) I suppose the GUI changed from the time this test case was written, and both scp and ftp options should validate this test case, right? I'll update the test case if I hear no disagreement. Updated. Thanks for comments. It's great, thanks a lot. Cheers, Hurry -- Contacts FAS name: Rhe IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa Email: r...@redhat.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Rawhide installation question
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:40 +0800, Qiang Li wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote: 2010/10/25 Qiang Li: What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide? You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the rawhide repo during the repo customization stage of anaconda. This approach will work most of the time. ~C It sounds good. However, would the anaconda contained in boot.iso of the most recent install media be too old to support rawhide installation? Or, would it be better to grab boot.iso from fedora branched repo, e.g. http://mirror site/fedora/development/14/x86_64/os/images ? Have you done it like this before? Looking forward to your reply. Qiang Hi Qiang, Either boot.iso is ok for installing rawhide, just remember to change the package repo to point to rawhide. I used to install rawhide by using boot.iso of previous releases/pre-releases, and it worked as expected. Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Final TC Validation Test Recap
Greetings testers, Fedora 14 Final TC validation test event has come to an end, this time we have more testers participating in the events and therefore more bugs were identified including blocker bugs, so many thanks for the ones who leaded/attended/payed attention on the test event. As before, test results are summarized below for your reference: === Installation = * F14Blocker(538277): 642358 CLOSED ERRATA - Up arrow tries to run gnome-screenshot 643742 CLOSED DUPLICATE of 643580 - blank screen on dvd install, working on livecd 642483 CLOSED ERRATA - Remove the 'Pre-release Software' Warning Screen 583906 CLOSED ERRATA - Backtrace in clearpart_gui when only uninitialized disks are found 642557 CLOSED ERRATA - after a split-media install, system fails to boot * F14-accepted(635218): 643580 ON_QA - Fedora 14 TC1 DVD Graphical Install Fails 642699 CLOSED ERRATA - Booting a system with multiple encrypted devices over serial console, prompts for passphrase multiple times * Warnings: 642913 NEW - RepoError: database disk image is malformed 642955 NEW - anaconda asks for existing encryption passphrase twice 585006 NEW - anaconda and livecd-creator are creating i386 and x86_64 ISOs which are larger than indicated by the ISO header 528232 ASSIGNED - Hang with EFI booting on iMac and Macbook Pro 6.2 642951 ASSIGNED - DVD upgrading requires cd install media 615572 CLOSED WORKSFORME - Network installation not possible without IPv4 DHCP available. = Desktop = * F14-accepted(635218): 643416 CLOSED ERRATA - F14 TC1.1 LXDE Spin: Unable to input any character to text box in User Manager screen. * Warnings: 643838 NEW - Crash in QRasterPaintEngine::fillRect on Cirrus video card (KVM) 643223 NEW - gnome-dictionary's default source, dict.org, is down 643316 NEW - fedora release is not shown 640793 NEW - [abrt] nautilus-2.32.0-1.fc14: g_type_check_instance_cast: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) 643435 NEW - Automatically unlock function seems break. It always asks password when I'm logged in. 643388 CLOSED UPSTREAM - [abrt] lxpanel-0.5.6-1.fc14: IA__gtk_widget_show: Process /usr/bin/lxpanel was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) 643835 CLOSED DUPLICATE of 643108 - system-config-firewall org.fedoraproject.slip.dbus.service.PolKit.NotAuthorizedException.org.fedoraproject.config.firewall.auth: The detailed result pages are in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Final_TC_Test_Results If you have interest, please help track and verify the bugs listed or marked as blockers. Also be noticed that Fedora 14 Final Release Candidate(RC) validation test event is coming soon[1], its announcement will be sent out once F14-Final-RC1 is available. Stay tuned for this! Thanks, Hurry [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Testing f14 anaconda
Thanks for sharing this Mike, it's very useful for testing the anaconda package in the updates-testing repo. Cheers, Hurry On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 17:17 +0100, mike cloaked wrote: There is currently version anaconda-14.20-1.fc14 in updates-testing but I seem to be the only one who has tested it ( At least according to bodhi comments) . It would be nice if this could be pushed into the main f14 repo so that it is included in the F14 builds ahead of release. I tested tc1.1 for a DVD install, but this still has the previous version of anaconda in it. If anyone wants to test the new version of anaconda from updates-testing it may be useful if I detail what I did to test it for an install. Then others could do something similar. I used a usbkey for install but other methods could adapt the same basic idea and would be good to test an alternative method. I downloaded the tc1.1 DVD iso from http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1.1/Fedora/i386/iso/ as well as the boot.iso from http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1.1/Fedora/i386/os/images/ Then I used the script from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bcl i.e. the file upd_bootiso referenced from that web page, and executed it with the new anaconda rpm downloaded from a mirror for f14 updates-testing so that a new boot.iso was written containing the new anaconda. This gave a file new-boot.iso in /tmp/ which I renamed back to boot.iso to be used as the test install file. What I then did was to prepare a usbkey for the install in an f13 system, plugging in the usbkey and then executing as root: umount /dev/sdb1 (since my key was sdb) Then livecd-iso-to-disk --reset-mbr path-to/boot.iso /dev/sdb1 prepares the key as a bootable device - ready to boot the new boot.iso The last stage was to copy the DVD iso onto the key as well. To test I booted from the key and this initiated the install onto the laptop using the new version of anconda (and checked on screen as the install began)- it then referenced the DVD iso on the usbkey - the only watchpoint was to switch the writing of grub onto the MBR of the internal HD rather than the default /dev/sdb by selecting Switch Device at the bootloader settings screen, and swapping the setting of first and second BIOS drive so that grub goes onto the MBR of /dev/sda rather than /dev/sdb The install for me was then uneventful and completed normally - and I have added a comment in bodhi with positive karma. If anyone else can run a test then presumably with karma +2 the new anaconda package would get used in the next compose for rc ahead of GA? Would be nice if someone else could test for an install. -- mike c -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Please help test boot method: efidisk.img
Greetings folks, We've nearly finished all the tests in the installation test result page with the contribution of testers and now there's only one test left for testing: QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img This test validates booting from a efidisk.img on a system capable of supporting EFI. Therefore, anyone who has such environment please help test this case using 14.TC1.1 and mark your result in the first row of general tests matrix: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test#General_Tests The results of other tests are still welcomed for wider coverage, and a summary of the test event will be sent out tomorrow. Thanks for support! Cheers, Hurry On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 20:47 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: Fedora 14 Final TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha, Beta, and Final priority test cases for installation [2] and desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Final Release Criteria [4]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test list [6]. IMPORTANT: The real TC1 (the one that the above test results pages refer to) is in the 14.TC1.1 directory. The old version is still in 14.TC1. Be sure to use the 14.TC1.1 version for testing. [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Final_Release_Criteria [5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: f14 beta hard disk install still busted
Hi Tom, Your problem seems similar to the commonbug below: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F14_bugs#Error_setting_up_repository_-_16.2C_Device_busy There's an updates.img in the link to work around the problem. Does it work for you? On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 19:23 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638788 It gets farther along the install process than the alpha DVD did, but I still can't actually install from harddisk. Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 Beta RC3 install from DVD is a world of hurt.
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 21:05 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote: On 26/09/10 19:24, Steven Haigh wrote: I have lodged this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637495 I have attached to it what I saw looked to be the required logs. For the record, installing on a laptop with an IDE DVD drive works as expected. It seems that these install bugs may be only for users with USB DVD drives. Thanks for verifying this, Steven, I guess it's related to USB too. Can anyone else having USB DVD drive please help testing DVD installation and checking if the same issue happens? Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 Beta RC3 install from DVD is a world of hurt.
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 10:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: skip I would like to have a clear story from anaconda or whoever on what exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to USB, and what isn't. I've never been particularly clear on that point. It would be good to clear it up and add some specific install validation tests for it - Hurry, do you agree? Of course. I proposed this idea on F13 retrospective but just haven't got time to focus on it. Now I create a ticket[1] so that we can track this in it. Feel free to add comments. Thanks, Hurry [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/134 -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 Beta RC3 install from DVD is a world of hurt.
Hi Steven, On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 03:43 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote: Hi all, I've tried just about everything over the last 12 hours to get F14 Beta 3 to install from DVD with no success. I've been booting from the DVD and found that at the repo selection screen, only internet repos are found. The install DVD is lost and the installation will not proceed without downloading all packages from an internet repo. This defeats the purpose of having a DVD... I could see the packages in /mnt/sysimage (I think), and the DVD was certainly present, just ignored. This is not as expected. DVD installation is a basic test included in the pre-release validation install tests, and we've verified that media repo will be selected as default if install from Beta RC3 DVD at least both on kvm and bare metal. The iso should be mounted on /mnt/source where the packages are stored. So can you provide the details of your installation steps and environment? And the contents in /tmp/anaconda.log? Is this bug[1] similar to yours? Thanks in advance. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627789 I also found that when doing an ethereal dump on my ASDL connection that each package seemed to be downloaded twice. For each package that was downloaded, I saw 2 separate GET requests heading to the web server. I could not find any specific information about this from the installer. I also noticed that the defaults for an XFS filesystem are to continue to use a 256 byte inode. This is VERY suboptimal with selinux enabled and can cause major performance issues. I lodged a bug on this here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637369 All in all, for a Beta GOLD release, I would have at least expected the DVD installation to be tested before RC3 was declared gold :( I've also read your another thread. Well, have you noticed the test announcements(eg.[2]) sent out when each build was available? We did it every time and both installation and desktop tests were executed and the results were provided on the results pages[3]. Then based on the results and other bugs on bugzilla, the candidate was considered if it met the release criteria[4] or not. So DVD installation would surely be tested before released, but everyone has different install environment, we cannot guarantee it passes in every way. However, if you encountered an issue, discussion is welcomed in the list to help find the root cause and resolve the problem. Also if you have any suggestion for the installation validation test[5], feel free to talk. :) Thanks, Hurry [2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-September/093947.html [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Test_Results [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Criteria [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta RC3 Available Now!
Thanks for your announcement, Andre. I will be away on holidays in the following three days, so testers please help validate the DVD, CD and Live Image installation tests[1]. Thanks in advance! Rgds, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 03:48 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: Fedora 14 Beta RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for installation [2] and desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [4]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test list [6]. [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Criteria [5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Anaconda TranslationKeyboard Test Day - Thursday 2010-09-16
Greetings Testers, Anaconda TranslationKeyboard Test Day is coming up tomorrow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current This day will mainly focus on the translation and keyboard in different languages during installation. Test cases have been well prepared on the wiki page with the help of l10n[1] and i18n[2] team, and the steps are clear for your reference. So if you used to install in your native language or know a second language besides English, this is an opportunity to try them out and help discover the issues in this area. F-14-beta-TC1 images are available for testing in this event, executing tests in virtual guest is also acceptable if you don't have extra space in bare metal. The Test Day will run all day in Freenode IRC #fedora-test-day. See you there!:) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10n [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta Test Compose Validation Test ( 09/09 - 09/15 )
Greetings testers, As scheduled, F-14 Beta Test Compose is going to be available soon, please keep attention on it and execute the installation[1] and desktop[2] tests to help ensure that the F-14 Beta Release Criterion is met[3]. Test result pages with detailed testing instructions are at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Beta_TC_Test_Results Please beware that once F-14 Beta TC#1 is available, another announcement will be sent out informing this, stay tuned! Happy Testing! Thanks, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Criteria -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Alpha 14 Installation
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:56 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote: When trying to install Alpha 14, it comes to a halt with this error message: Line 65 does not end with %%end. I don't understand that. Please advise. Did you install with kickstart file? If yes, you need the %end there in the file. Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day 2010-09-02 Recap
Greetings, Many thanks for the ones who attended this test day, though we don't have much attendance, the general tests for preupgrade have been nicely covered with its bugs filed and verified. The common issue testers encountered during preupgrade has been identified to be an anaconda bug: 624971 CLOSED NEXTRELEASE - Kernel argument with UUID= is not honored 629245 DUPLICATE OF 624971 - install,img saved in /boot/upgrade/ but searched in /boot/images Preupgrade bugs include: 629738 NEW - preupgrade ignores --help/--version 629745 NEW - preupgrade exit status should reflect failure 629814 NEW - preupgrade does not account for transaction size when computing if enough disk space is available 629890 NEW - Allow automatic restart 592345 ASSIGNED - preupgrade-1.1.6-1.fc12 adds extra spaces to grub.conf, results in failed upgrade If you are interested, a detailed result can be found at the test day page[1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-09-02_Preupgrade Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day - Thursday 2010-09-02
Greetings, Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current Several problems have been reported when preupgrading to F-14 Alpha, this day we will focus on preupgrade[1] to summarize the issues. The tests were designed to cover general circumstances, including preupgrade from current release (enough /boot space), preupgrade from older release (not enough /boot space for downloading) and preupgrade-cli test. Exploring additional command-line options are also welcomed for more issues discovered under this area. Please don't hesitate to attend this test day if you are interested in it, the test day will run tomorrow in freenode IRC #fedora-test-day. See You There and Happy Testing!:) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Preupgrade -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
Re: F13 F14 Alpha preupgrade fails to find install.img
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:08 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote: Please see bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627377 Any suggestions on further info/help I can provide? I've filed a bug#624971 earlier about this issue, and probably like Chris Bagwell said, it misused /images/install.img as directory instead of /upgrade/install.img. Also welcome to attend preupgrade test day next Thursday(0902). Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 alpha a total bust for me...
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 21:37 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627058 I can reproduce this hard disk install issue. I've also made some tests and it's probably because that the directories specified under the disk are not honored as kernel parameters, which means anaconda only looks for the 'images/' under '/' in your specified disk. So if you put 'images/' under '/' in your /dev/sdb2, anaconda can retrieve install.img successfully. Another workaround is to use 'askmethod' and then configure the disk and the directories manually when prompted. But even if the install.img can be retrieved, you will still encounter another bug for retrieving iso repo[1], this has been marked in the test result page[2]. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621469 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 14 Alpha RC Validation Test Summary
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:04 +0800, He Rui wrote: Greetings testers, Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC validation test events, especially for Andre's leading of the events, quite a mount of bugs were identified and fixed until RC4 was posted and finally meets Alpha Release Criteria[1]. As always, here I summarized the test result based on the tests in both test matrices: Suggestion to avoid confusion for the future - separate the bug lists by release (Alpha, Beta, Final) and into 'warn' and 'fail' groups? That way it's more obvious when we encounter bugs during, say, Alpha testing, which don't actually block Alpha release. Great idea, Adam, thanks! It is a little weird when the build meets release criteria but has a list of bugs... I've updated the sop[1] and will start doing this from Beta testing.:) Cheers, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/SOP_Release_Validation_Test_Event#Report_and_Summary -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 14 Alpha RC Validation Test Summary
Greetings testers, Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC validation test events, especially for Andre's leading of the events, quite a mount of bugs were identified and fixed until RC4 was posted and finally meets Alpha Release Criteria[1]. As always, here I summarized the test result based on the tests in both test matrices: ** Installation 623067 NEW - Failed to install using an FTP installation resource 623524 NEW - Err during filesystem check after upgrading bootloader 585006 NEW - livecd-creator creates i386 and x86_64 ISOs which are larger than indicated by the ISO header 624971 NEW - Fail to upgrade with preupgrade-1.1.4-1.fc13 621027 NEW - Graphical screen in anaconda shows F-13 623956 NEW - Graphical anaconda failed to display in kvm with xdriver=vesa 621469 MODIFIED - Fail to retrieve repo info using 'repo=nfsiso:' 596985 ON_QA - hang at start of X11 on fresh install from DVD 624414 CLOSED CANTFIX - OOMKILL on VM with 768MB RAM and no swap Desktop 621825 NEW - [abrt] gnome-keyring-2.31.4-2.fc14: g_str_hash: Process /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) To view detailed test results, please refer to the RC results pages[2]. And feel free to discuss if you have any suggestion/idea/criticism on the validation test events. Stay tuned for Beta Candidates! Thanks! Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Alpha_RC_Test_Results -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker status is unclear: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 A follow up to this: a boot.iso with a proposed fix for this bug is available at http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso . If you were affected by this issue, please test this and let us know if it works okay. Even if you weren't affected by the bug, if you have a bit of spare time, it would be valuable if you can try the boot.iso and just confirm it works alright on non-affected systems (as long as you can get to the graphical portion of the install process, that's fine: you don't need to actually install). Thanks! Good news! This boot.iso works nicely on my workstation (ATI Technologies Inc RV620 LE [Radeon HD 3450]) which had to disable kms on previous Alpha builds. Will update it on the bug report. Thanks! Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size for Netinst
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 02:30 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
- Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
James Laska jlaska at redhat.com writes:
I believe the {netinst,boot}.iso are intended to fit on a 700M cdr.
I edited
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size
to indicate that netinst should be CD-sized. I'd like to delete the
examples,
which all use ls -sh, due to the possibility for confusion between
IEC values
(which are displayed by default) and SI values (which require the --si
option).
The upper size limits are already given as exact numbers of bytes, so
people
can just use ls -l (which is easier to remember and not subject to
rounding/truncation errors). Is this okay?
I'm not sure which way it is easier to compare it :) But go ahead and try
it and we will see.
Quite interestingly, 'ls -s --si' (without -h) prints rounded numbers
(like 400M) instead of precise numbers, at least for me. That's really
not ideal.
--si is likewise -h, just use powers of 1000 not 1024(see 'ls' manual).
--
Contacts
Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: QA:Testcase Memtest86
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 03:18 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: - He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote: 2. Test report is shown once a test is completed. The test is never completed, it runs infinitely over and over again. It takes quite some time too. Also, no report is ever shown, just statistics are continuously updated in the lower part of the screen. Very confusing. If a test cycle is completed(From test#1 to test#8, About 5 mins for 512M memory), A test result will be shown at the bottom: Pass Complete, no errors, press ESC to exit I haven't met the failure status, but a relative result is supposed to be provided after one cycle is finished as well. Ah, I never waited long enough to finish the whole test cycle :) But the instructions also says I should change the configuration, so I changed configuration to do just test #2, and it did it like 20 times over with no end at all, just repeating itself. So it depends on user choice (and whether he knows this stuff). I think this test case is needlessly overcomplicated. We just need to test that Memory Test available on installation media just works, right? So what about something like: How to test: 1. Insert installation media and display its boot prompt 2. Select option Memory Test 3. Have the test running for a few moments 'A few moments' should be more accurate, at least test#1 - test#8 is finished. Expected results: 1. Memory test runs a tests your memory, it seems to work correctly. 2. You can use configuration to change test settings, e.g. select just one single test out of the test set to be tested. Sounds better? Also add this one to verify the test result: 3. Test Report(Or test result) is shown once a test cycle(test#1-test#8) is done. I still think we shouldn't do this. Quick check whether memtest starts and runs ok is sufficient imho. Full RAM testing is: 1. time consuming 2. you never know how to handle potential error. it may be memtest issue, hardware issue, KVM issue, ... I understand you want to test full memtest featureset (all tests work etc), but we don't do that even for more important programs, it's just not efficient. Smoke testing is all I would do here (and that's exactly what I tried to capture in sentences wait a few moments, memtest seems to work correctly). I don't intend to cover all the memtest features, but think we should at least check if there's a test result shown to reflect the test, that's the main goal to run a memtest. -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: QA:Testcase Memtest86
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 04:42 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: - He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote: I don't intend to cover all the memtest features, but think we should at least check if there's a test result shown to reflect the test, that's the main goal to run a memtest. Ok, I have waited for the whole test cycle to complete (10 minutes on my machine). It really prints Pass complete, no errors, press Esc to exit message. But - there is no report per se, the counter is just updated (Pass +1). And it doesn't mean your RAM is ok. I have used memtest for years and checked a lot of faulty hardware with it. From my experience you need at least 2 hours of memtest checking to be quite reasonable sure your RAM is ok. 4 - 8 hours are better. That's also the reason why it continues over and over again. Also, if some error is found, you don't have to wait to the end of the test cycle. It is printed right away. The message printed after one pass is complete is really not a test result. It's just a message how to exit the test. The test results are updated continuously - the screen is blue, you're good, the screen is red, you're not good. The longer you wait (measured in hours) the more trust you have in your hardware. So maybe that's the main misconception between us? Yes. I thought whether the memory test was passed or not depended on the report Pass complete, no errors,... and I never met any failed one. So if the error is printed right away, then this result is not that important and running a few moments is reasonable. Thanks for clarifying this. Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
PTO Tomorrow Morning - Aug 14
Greeting, I have an urgent thing to deal with tomorrow morning, will be back at noon. Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts FAS name: Rhe IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa Email: r...@redhat.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:49 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for installation [2] and desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [4]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test list [6]. [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria [5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test The live images are synchronizing now, I've updated the desktop text matrix with the download link. Go forth and test! I just tried x86_64 live build, but it's unable to boot, system fell to totally black screen where grub manual was supposed to be shown.[1] Hurry [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623090 -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC3 still NO GO with ATI
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 18:09 +0800, He Rui wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 02:28 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: With the default driver of the basic video driver, RC3 still goes to a blank screen using Core Duo and ATU 5670 display card. The keyboard still seems to work but without a working graphics it's hosed. As before, no text mode option is displayed. Confirmed. Have to install with basic video driver. Is there already a filed bug for tracking? That's not 'confirmed', you're seeing different bugs. Chuck says With the default driver of the basic video driver, RC3 still goes to a blank screen... The word 'of' is a pretty obvious typo for 'or', so for Chuck, it doesn't work with radeon or vesa. For Hurry, it doesn't work with radeon but does work with vesa. That's not the same bug. Hurry's case sounds possibly like John Reiser's: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 (note that in contrast to the initial report, later on John makes it clear that with basic video driver, install *does* work, unless he hits some other unrelated bug). Chuck's would seem to be something different. Actually, I've discovered a wrinkle here. The 'Basic video driver' option isn't actually working right. For Radeons, it will result in the installer using the 'radeon' driver, but with UMS not KMS, which will indeed have unpredictable results: it could certainly work for some people but not others. Ah, yes. As clarified, in my case, it's the 'nomodeset' working rather than vesa driver when I selected 'install with basic video driver'. Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Trying to update F14/RC1 to F14/RC2 by the F14/RC2 DVD
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 13:41 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi F14 testers, I'm having a F14/RC1 (i686)running, and now I burned the F14/RC2/DVD (i686), booted from that DVD with saying update an existing system. I answered the question for the partition to update (is the F14/RC1). Then I'm asked select data storage device and install target device (why this, if I want to update only ???), then pressing the next button, but nothing happens. If I switch to some console window and switching back to the X11 window, it becomes blanked, and all hangs. Anybody made similar experiences? I tried to reproduce your problem by virt-installing F14/RC1 i386 first and upgrading it using F14-alpha-rc2 DVD, but it worked as expected without this issue happening. Did you see the bootloader configuration screen after selecting update an existing system and clicking next? If yes, which bootloader configuration method did you choose? And please file a bug and updating the test matr...@] after you verify it. Thanks, Hurry [...@] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test#General_Tests -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Problem: Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC2 Available Now!
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 20:11 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: On 08/08/10 17:50, Adam Williamson wrote: snip Have uploaded boot image using virt-manager (rawvirt.repo) http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-080810-134240.php Thought this was a fixed bug? It should be. Can you do 'rpm -q systemd udev' on the installed system? Thanks. systemd-5-2.fc14.i686 udev-160-8.fc14.i686 Reproduced it on x86_64 system as well after minimal package virt-install. Thought it's bug#618315[1]. Thanks, Hurry [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618315 -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC1 Available Now!
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 14:08 +0800, He Rui wrote: Hi all, There's a kernel panic in the first stage of anaconda in x86_64 boot.iso (probably in other x86_64 images as well): Bug 621775 - kernel panic- not syncing: VFS : unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(9,2) Confirmed it in x86_64 DVD.iso. Note that i386 system boots normally. Thanks, Hurry Rgds, Hurry On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 00:40 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: Fedora 14 Alpha RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for installation [2] and desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [4]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test list [6]. [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria [5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC1 Available Now!
Hi all, There's a kernel panic in the first stage of anaconda in x86_64 boot.iso (probably in other x86_64 images as well): Bug 621775 - kernel panic- not syncing: VFS : unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(9,2) Rgds, Hurry On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 00:40 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: Fedora 14 Alpha RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for installation [2] and desktop [3] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [4]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [5], or on the test list [6]. [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria [5] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [6] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha TC1 Is Available Now!
Greetings Testers, F-14 Alpha TC1 has been posted for testing: * http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/ Please read the instructions and help executing the test cases at: Installation: * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Feel free to discuss any issue/problem/bug encountered on IRC/Test List and file it in bugzilla if it's a bug. Happy testing~! Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
Re: L10N QA Template for F14
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:40 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote: Em Qui, 2010-07-29 às 14:53 +0800, He Rui escreveu: On 07/29/2010 04:16 AM, Igor Pires Soares wrote: Those tests are labeled as language tests but they are also intended for input method testing, what is more related to i18n IMHO. On the other hand, they are more properly handled by the l10n because of their requirements. So maybe we just need to add a link in the l10n tests template pointing to the i18n installation tests cases along with some additional instructions, because I'm sure that most translators are not aware of i18n test cases. Okay, that's cool. I added a link for the i18n installation test cases at [1]. I also created a page explaining the L10N test procedure [2]. It still is a draft, so if someone wants to make it better it would be appreciated. I read [2], it's good. Hosting it as a test day is a great idea, so we can have l10n and i18n guys together. I can send an email to the l10n list asking for collaboration. Thanks, it would be appreciated! And we can also publicize this event to local communities for maximum attendance. Software translation deadline is on 2010-08-31, so we could have the test day on 2010-09-02. There is an open slot. What do you think? That day is tricky. Beta Test Compose is supposed to be posted on 2010-09-02 [*], which however is American time. Therefore, in some parts like Asia, Beta images are still unavailable at that day. So if you agree, we can have it on 2010-09-09, the day in the following week. Then we could at least have Beta TC candidates for testing. Is it okay for you? I agree, no problem for me. We can have it on 2010-09-09. I've updated the schedule[!], along with a ticket#1...@]. Will discuss the details with you in the ticket.o(*^▽^*)o Have a nice day. Thanks, Hurry [!] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_14_test_days [...@] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/112 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_14_l10n_Results_Template [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:L10n_Test_Procedure -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: L10N QA Template for F14
On 07/29/2010 04:16 AM, Igor Pires Soares wrote: Em Qua, 2010-07-28 às 15:12 +0800, He Rui escreveu: Unfortunately, the i18n team doesn't have a specific test case template to cover keyboard testings in Anaconda [1]. But we do have test cases covering i18n installation [2]. Hehe, these tests are created by myself with guidance from Adam, James and Jens. But I think [2] should be renamed as l10n installation since l10n team is in charge of the translation? Those tests are labeled as language tests but they are also intended for input method testing, what is more related to i18n IMHO. On the other hand, they are more properly handled by the l10n because of their requirements. So maybe we just need to add a link in the l10n tests template pointing to the i18n installation tests cases along with some additional instructions, because I'm sure that most translators are not aware of i18n test cases. Okay, that's cool. Anyway, we still have to write a specific test case template if we want help from the L10N members. I believe this is worth testing because we had a lot of trouble with this issue during the Fedora 13 development cycle. Yeah, recently I found a bug(#617040) in F13 GA which even prevents install by using Arabic language. This is one of the issues which should have been discovered under the F13 cycle. So to improve on this, in F14 cycle, how about we hosting it as a test day topic[3]? The translation is gonna be finished after Alpha phase, so this test day could be someday in the beta phase targeting on language translation and keyboard tests in anaconda for Beta candidates. Test cases[2] could be further modified or changed for use, and then we need to find testers both inside and outside the groups to maximum the participation and bugs discovery on that day(s). What do you think of this? Hosting it as a test day is a great idea, so we can have l10n and i18n guys together. I can send an email to the l10n list asking for collaboration. Thanks, it would be appreciated! And we can also publicize this event to local communities for maximum attendance. Software translation deadline is on 2010-08-31, so we could have the test day on 2010-09-02. There is an open slot. What do you think? That day is tricky. Beta Test Compose is supposed to be posted on 2010-09-02 [*], which however is American time. Therefore, in some parts like Asia, Beta images are still unavailable at that day. So if you agree, we can have it on 2010-09-09, the day in the following week. Then we could at least have Beta TC candidates for testing. Is it okay for you? Cheers, Hurry [*] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-releng-tasks.html -- Contacts FAS name: Rhe IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa Email: r...@redhat.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Possible new release criterion: installation boot menu
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:47 -0400, James Laska wrote: I was just trying to cover the possibilities. For me, the appearance of a graphical menu is really a polish issue and doesn't fit well with Alpha, it seems more suited to Beta or Final. But the practical element is whether the boot-to-the-installer process actually works, no matter what you see in the meantime. For me the loss of the other options on the menu isn't really critical until beta, but the install process should at least start if you just boot and wait at Alpha stage. It may be too much effort to draw this distinction, though, in which case we may as well go with #1. Yeah, definitely #1. I have gone ahead and added this criterion to the F14 Alpha criteria: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Alpha_Release_Requirements Thanks for clarifying, I've added this as one expected result in boot method tests[1]. Cheers, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Installer_Boot_Methods -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: L10N QA Template for F14
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 16:32 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote: Em Qua, 2010-07-21 às 09:34 +1000, noriko escreveu: James Laska さんは書きました: The tool is not packaged or available in fedora infrastructure. I think it would be a worthwhile experiment to get familiar with the tool and it's workflows. Yes, it is not available in fedora infra. I think same with James. But also I am wondering how many translators would be able to get familiar with the tool without deployment... Meanwhile we discuss the adoption and testing of this new tool, I have updated the L10N QA Template for Fedora 14 [1]. Old packages like hwbrowser were removed and others like audit-viewer, kexec-tools, liveusb-creator and preupgrade included. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_14_l10n_Results_Template Hi Igor, The template looks quite good, and I did some minor changes on it, hope it's helpful. I found out that the tests in your template are to test packages on desktop, so I'm curious about the language/keyboard tests in anaconda during installation of images(such as boot.iso, DVD, or CD). I had a talk with noriko earlier, she told me that the translation of built images will be due before 2010-08-23, therefore the test of this part is planed to happen between 08-23 and 08-31[1]. So will there also be a similar test template and test results page for tracking the tests of translation and keyboard in anaconda? Thanks, Hurry [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-trans-tasks.html -- Igor Pires Soares Fedora I18N/L10N QA https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Igor -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RE: Proven Testers - Testing Protocols - Discussion Starter - Answer to Hurry (Adam Miller)
Hi Bob, Below is a very good guidance on how to obtain and use your personal space on fedorapeople.org : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org Please refer to it. And I'll forward and discuss your script with Adam on another thread. Thanks, Hurry On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 19:39 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote: Adam - I;m having issues with my fedorapeoplespace right now. But I emailed you the script under seperate cover. You and Hurry can figure out how it needs to be sanitized and formatted for public release and do so with my blessing. BobLfoot -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Proven Testers - Testing Protocols - Discussion Starter
Clear steps, well done.
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 20:16 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
Dear Test Community:
Being in the queue for Proven-Tester status and waiting for a
mentor I am spending my time testing packages as they reach
updates-testing. I thought I'd share for discussion the protocol I
am
using when I have a test night. Keep in mind I wrote this for my use
on
a Host System with 6 VMs {2-F12; 2-F13 and 2-F14 when released}, but
I
think portions will have broader applications.
*
# Steps used to provide karma for updates-testing releases
1. run ./vmsupdate.sh and install all updates from updates-testing
into
all VMs
I'm curious about vmsupdate.sh. Did you write this file yourself so that
all virt guests will install updates once you run it on the host?
Thanks,
Hurry
--
Contacts
Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Testcase Anaconda User Interface VNC updated
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 05:09 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: - He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote: Then How about adding a step 4 in 'How to test' like: # Proceed and complete installation with VNC client. And in the 'Expected Results', add a step like: # VNC works normally during installation and anaconda can be configured by both mouse and keyboard. Sure thing, updated, thanks. Looks very nice. Thank you! Cheers, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] StorageFiltering Test Day - Thursday 2010-04-22
Please ignore the date in the subject of the last email. StorageFiltering test day will be held on this Thursday (2010-04-22). Very sorry about that. Thanks, Hurry Forwarded Message From: He Rui r...@redhat.com Reply-to: t...@lists.fedoraproject.org To: test-announce test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [Test-Announce] StorageFiltering Test Day - Thursday 2010-04-08 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:19:21 +0800 Greetings, A big test day is coming up tomorrow - StorageFiltering[1] test day: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-04-22_StorageFiltering At the request of many folks with lots of storage available, anaconda now has the ability to prune the available storage presented as an install target and provide users the ability to select which devices to use during installation. Therefore, users with varies kinds of storage devices like RAID, ISCSI, FCoE, Multipath etc are highly welcomed to this test day. The Test Day runs all *Thursday* in #fedora-test-day on Freenode IRC. Hope to see you there! (ˉ▽￣～) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/StorageFiltering -- Contacts FAS Name: Rhe Location: Beijing/UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list t...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Contacts FAS Name: Rhe Location: Beijing/UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta RC#4 available now!
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:21 +0800, Li Ming wrote: Since RC4 anaconda is still 13.37.2, which is the same as f13-beta-RC3, so we did not have a deep test for this version,most of the RC4 test results were transferred from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_13_Beta_RC3_Install Right, and the encrypted install bug[1] is verified fix in RC4. Thanks Hurry [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578633 Thanks Liam On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM, He Rui wrote: Greetings, Fedora 13 Beta RC#4 is available for testing. Andre has created the test results page and deltaisos for us. I highlighted the test cases which have critical issues in Beta RC2 and RC3 candidates tests[1]. If you are interested in providing feedback against the Beta release criteria [2], please contribute your test results in the following areas: * Installation - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test * Desktop - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test As always, feel free to discuss problems/issues with other testers on #fedora-qa or t...@lists.fedoraproject.org. Thanks! Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_13_Beta_RC_Test_Results [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria -- Contacts FAS Name: Rhe Location: Beijing/UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
[Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta RC#2 Available for testing Now!
Greetings testers, F13 Beta RC2 has been uploaded for testing. I've summarized main issues on Beta RC1[1] and highlighted related test cases on current matrices of the following links. Please test them as first priority to make sure they meet the beta release criteria[2]: Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Please leave your results on the above pages and feel free to discuss queries/problems/issues on #fedora-qa or t...@lists.fedoraproject.org. Many thanks, Hurry [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-March/089805.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria -- Contacts FAS Name: Rhe Location: Beijing/UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
[Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta TC#1 Available Now!
Hi all, F13 Beta TC1 has been uploaded, please follow the guidance in the below links: Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Many thanks, Hurry Forwarded Message From: He Rui r...@redhat.com Reply-to: fedora-test-l...@redhat.com To: test-announce test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta TC#1 Validation Test Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:00:25 +0800 Greetings, Fedora 13 Beta Test Compose test is arriving[1]. Thanks for the ones who attended/paid attention on alpha test and please continue enjoying the validation test on Beta. This time all the alpha and beta priority test cases of installation[2] and desktop[3] should be passed to ensure they meet the Beta Release Criteria [4]. You can follow the guidance and download the images(once it's available) to execute test cases at: Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Don't hesitate to leave your results on the above pages and please feel free to discuss queries/problems/issues on #fedora-qa or t...@lists.fedoraproject.org. Many thanks, Hurry [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-13/f-13-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria -- Contacts FAS Name: Rhe Location: Beijing/UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
[Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta TC#1 Validation Test
Greetings, Fedora 13 Beta Test Compose test is arriving[1]. Thanks for the ones who attended/paid attention on alpha test and please continue enjoying the validation test on Beta. This time all the alpha and beta priority test cases of installation[2] and desktop[3] should be passed to ensure they meet the Beta Release Criteria [4]. You can follow the guidance and download the images(once it's available) to execute test cases at: Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Don't hesitate to leave your results on the above pages and please feel free to discuss queries/problems/issues on #fedora-qa or t...@lists.fedoraproject.org. Many thanks, Hurry [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-13/f-13-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria -- Contacts FAS Name: Rhe Location: Beijing/UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
