[NMCAVER] Enchantment cover photo

2010-09-01 Thread John Lyles
Last night I was looking at the September Enchantment newspaper, Voice of NM 
Rural Electric Co-ops for those of you having PNM or other power sources. The 
woman climbing, shown on the 
cover photo titled Dancing with Rocks, sure looked familiar. Its former NM 
caver/climber/diver Tanja Pietrass climbing near Socorro! Tanja, you go!

jtml


___
NMCAVER mailing list
nmca...@caver.net
http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/nmcaver_caver.net


texascavers Digest 1 Sep 2010 19:58:24 -0000 Issue 1143

2010-09-01 Thread texascavers-digest-help

texascavers Digest 1 Sep 2010 19:58:24 - Issue 1143

Topics (messages 15914 through 15931):

Re: Purificacion related ( I think )
15914 by: Gill Edigar
15915 by: Frank Binney

Re: Cave Lighting Install
15916 by: Gerry and Cindy Geletzke

new book available from AMCS
15917 by: Mixon Bill

off topic - last night for Blue Monday on KUT after 29 years
15918 by: Logan McNatt
15920 by: Gill Edigar

for you kayakers
15919 by: David

Laguna de Sanchez road working trip
15921 by: Sheryl Rieck
15922 by: Mark.Alman.L-3com.com
15926 by: Nico Escamilla

White Nose Syndrome video prepared by Texas Parks and Wildlife
15923 by: Geary Schindel

Honeycreek trip Sept 18th
15924 by: Kurt L. Menking

Caving conferences down south
15925 by: George Veni

Forests and Deserts to UT Grotto meeting
15927 by: Mixon Bill

Bedbugs, bats and caves in Science (NY) Times
15928 by: caverarch.aol.com

a new LED flashlight review
15929 by: David

excellent compact caver car for sale (Austin)
15930 by: Saj Zappitello

Gary Franklin
15931 by: Nico Escamilla

Administrivia:

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-subscr...@texascavers.com

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
texascavers-digest-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

To post to the list, e-mail:
texascavers@texascavers.com


--
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:16 AM, David dlocklea...@gmail.com wrote:
 There is a town along the highway to Ciudad Victoria called Hidalgo.
 It is just northeast of the Purificacion area.
 The mayor of that town was found shot to death today.

Geography lesson for the day.
The city of Hidalgo is as you described it. It is also the seat of
government for the Municipio de Hidalgo (more or less the status of a
county in Texas) which, by chance, is the Municipio in which Conrado
Castillo exists politically, though in the farthest southwest corner.
The owners and inhabitants of Conrado Castillo have always been
treated like an orphan child out in the far reaches of the boondocks
by the perpetually corrupt government in Hidalgo.
I think this is not the first mayor that's been shot there in the
past 50 years. Being a local politician in Mexico is fraught with much
fear and uncertainty. The perceived rewards of office must make them
worth running for. After all, not everybody dies in office. Most walk
away rich--or richer, at least--than when they entered though not
without some ulcers.
--Ediger
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
One of my favorite films about the potential rewards and fatal pitfalls of
being a small town mayor in rural Mexico is La ley de Herodes (Herod's Law).
You can find it on Netflix if your local video store doesn't have it. It's a
very funny satirical look at political corruption that will be especially
relevant to those oldsters among us who remember when Mexico was essentially
a one-party system under PRI.
--Frank Binney


On 8/30/10 5:08 PM, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:16 AM, David dlocklea...@gmail.com wrote:
 There is a town along the highway to Ciudad Victoria called Hidalgo.
 It is just northeast of the Purificacion area.
 The mayor of that town was found shot to death today.
 
 Geography lesson for the day.
 The city of Hidalgo is as you described it. It is also the seat of
 government for the Municipio de Hidalgo (more or less the status of a
 county in Texas) which, by chance, is the Municipio in which Conrado
 Castillo exists politically, though in the farthest southwest corner.
 The owners and inhabitants of Conrado Castillo have always been
 treated like an orphan child out in the far reaches of the boondocks
 by the perpetually corrupt government in Hidalgo.
 I think this is not the first mayor that's been shot there in the
 past 50 years. Being a local politician in Mexico is fraught with much
 fear and uncertainty. The perceived rewards of office must make them
 worth running for. After all, not everybody dies in office. Most walk
 away rich--or richer, at least--than when they entered though not
 without some ulcers.
 --Ediger
 
 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 
 


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Charles,
James Brown, Lydia Hernandez, Scott Kyle and I hauled Jame's dive gear to the 
sump.  The film crew set up on the ledge overlooking the mud dome and on the 
mud dome overlooking the sump.  James was expecting somebody to bring tarps to 
the cavern to cover a portion of the mud slope down to the sump but they did 
not arrive.  As a result, James made the decision to dive the pool at the sump 

[Texascavers] Gary Franklin

2010-09-01 Thread Nico Escamilla
For those interested Gary called me, he made it out of Laguna de Sanchez
with the van and is on his way to Austin
might even get there in time to make the grotto meeting.

my advice to the owners of the other two vehicles still there would be to
come down and get them out as soon as possible
before it rains and the fragile road gets washed again.

Nico


Re: [Texascavers] Gary Franklin

2010-09-01 Thread Rod Goke
Thanks for the update, Nico. I hope he makes it back in time for the UT Grotto 
meeting tonight. It should be a really interesting trip report!

Rod

-Original Message-
From: Nico Escamilla pitboun...@gmail.com
Sent: Sep 1, 2010 3:54 PM
To: Mailing List Texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: [Texascavers] Gary Franklin

For those interested Gary called me, he made it out of Laguna de Sanchez
with the van and is on his way to Austin
might even get there in time to make the grotto meeting.

my advice to the owners of the other two vehicles still there would be to
come down and get them out as soon as possible
before it rains and the fragile road gets washed again.

Nico


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



CONFIRM subscribe to texascavers@texascavers.com

2010-09-01 Thread texascavers-help
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
texascavers@texascavers.com mailing list.

I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at texascavers-ow...@texascavers.com.

I respectfully request your permission to add

   sheryl.ri...@gmail.com

to the subscribers of the texascavers mailing list. This request
either came from you, or it has already been verified by
the potential subscriber.

To confirm, please send an empty reply to this address:

   
texascavers-tc.1283372794.lgocfmlmiihofpoocfgk-sheryl.rieck=gmail@texascavers.com

Usually, this happens when you just hit the reply button.
If this does not work, simply copy the address and paste it into
the To: field of a new message.

If you don't approve, simply ignore this message.

Thank you for your help!


--- Administrative commands for the texascavers list ---

I can handle administrative requests automatically. Please
do not send them to the list address! Instead, send
your message to the correct command address:

For help and a description of available commands, send a message to:
   texascavers-h...@texascavers.com

To subscribe to the list, send a message to:
   texascavers-subscr...@texascavers.com

To remove your address from the list, just send a message to
the address in the ``List-Unsubscribe'' header of any list
message. If you haven't changed addresses since subscribing,
you can also send a message to:
   texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

For addition or removal of addresses, I'll send a confirmation
message to that address. When you receive it, simply reply to it
to complete the transaction.

If you need to get in touch with the human owner of this list,
please send a message to:

texascavers-ow...@texascavers.com

Please include a FORWARDED list message with ALL HEADERS intact
to make it easier to help you.

--- Enclosed is a copy of the request I received.

Return-Path: sheryl.ri...@gmail.com
Received: (qmail 16763 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2010 20:26:34 -
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175)
  by 192.168.254.10 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 20:26:34 -
Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6933008iwn.6
for 
texascavers-sc.1283372614.lmlijlgghdlcpbgcfacg-sheryl.rieck=gmail@texascavers.com;
 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
 :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=mgzy+mn6z/ppWA89vz5Qi6Hm/l1L4vDG76uz6JEXN6Q=;
b=s+rKcC8yuFKD526XL0uwxz7ibxNALZbZR+g0uP/GM50i/aXipwyFSqP9QW2Myl0xOQ
 OdazZmbcWfOwIYQ9BcOcVD0DUfVACH2UDdnRIe4U32DzMiIQDIiz0OS0Xp7yl1Xr///8
 W5JIP7hV2LsAhDkPc5J7UNHaciDlqaGfOm/dQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type;
b=ArEGnise0r+hOLxYK9rxD54S/DHT8VFjiyRaJ8whi0AXcG9dcEf6NemnPhPYUPODsj
 HaejfEOp4cqlT9jOwyI6ucj7HV3SrZ4rjU9BGSlT5Qi9VGyikGQcI8kqmDHe/YenNfu5
 c0nunpzbw1HWkNeLpLrsnBL+D05zMZ3Zgkrao=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.15.9 with SMTP id i9mr9220249iba.58.1283372793997; Wed, 01
 Sep 2010 13:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.152.79 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 1283372614.16693.ez...@texascavers.com
References: 1283372614.16693.ez...@texascavers.com
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:26:33 -0500
Message-ID: aanlktim88qkbzx6-fayzhd+nthh5kjqyzodeinman...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: Re: confirm subscribe to texascavers@texascavers.com
From: Sheryl Rieck sheryl.ri...@gmail.com
To: 
texascavers-sc.1283372614.lmlijlgghdlcpbgcfacg-sheryl.rieck=gmail@texascavers.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532ccc88029ad048f388354

--00221532ccc88029ad048f388354
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1



--00221532ccc88029ad048f388354
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

br

--00221532ccc88029ad048f388354--


Re: CONFIRM subscribe to texascavers@texascavers.com

2010-09-01 Thread Charles Goldsmith
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:26 PM, texascavers-h...@texascavers.com wrote:

 Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
 texascavers@texascavers.com mailing list.

 I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
 at texascavers-ow...@texascavers.com.

 I respectfully request your permission to add

   sheryl.ri...@gmail.com

 to the subscribers of the texascavers mailing list. This request
 either came from you, or it has already been verified by
 the potential subscriber.

 To confirm, please send an empty reply to this address:

   texascavers-tc.1283372794.lgocfmlmiihofpoocfgk-sheryl.rieck=gmail.com@
 texascavers.com

 Usually, this happens when you just hit the reply button.
 If this does not work, simply copy the address and paste it into
 the To: field of a new message.

 If you don't approve, simply ignore this message.

 Thank you for your help!


 --- Administrative commands for the texascavers list ---

 I can handle administrative requests automatically. Please
 do not send them to the list address! Instead, send
 your message to the correct command address:

 For help and a description of available commands, send a message to:
   texascavers-h...@texascavers.com

 To subscribe to the list, send a message to:
   texascavers-subscr...@texascavers.com

 To remove your address from the list, just send a message to
 the address in the ``List-Unsubscribe'' header of any list
 message. If you haven't changed addresses since subscribing,
 you can also send a message to:
   texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com

 For addition or removal of addresses, I'll send a confirmation
 message to that address. When you receive it, simply reply to it
 to complete the transaction.

 If you need to get in touch with the human owner of this list,
 please send a message to:

texascavers-ow...@texascavers.com

 Please include a FORWARDED list message with ALL HEADERS intact
 to make it easier to help you.

 --- Enclosed is a copy of the request I received.

 Return-Path: sheryl.ri...@gmail.com
 Received: (qmail 16763 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2010 20:26:34 -
 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175)
  by 192.168.254.10 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 20:26:34 -
 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6933008iwn.6
for texascavers-sc.1283372614.lmlijlgghdlcpbgcfacg-sheryl.rieck=
 gmail@texascavers.com; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
 :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=mgzy+mn6z/ppWA89vz5Qi6Hm/l1L4vDG76uz6JEXN6Q=;
b=s+rKcC8yuFKD526XL0uwxz7ibxNALZbZR+g0uP/GM50i/aXipwyFSqP9QW2Myl0xOQ

 OdazZmbcWfOwIYQ9BcOcVD0DUfVACH2UDdnRIe4U32DzMiIQDIiz0OS0Xp7yl1Xr///8
 W5JIP7hV2LsAhDkPc5J7UNHaciDlqaGfOm/dQ=
 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;

  h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type;
b=ArEGnise0r+hOLxYK9rxD54S/DHT8VFjiyRaJ8whi0AXcG9dcEf6NemnPhPYUPODsj

 HaejfEOp4cqlT9jOwyI6ucj7HV3SrZ4rjU9BGSlT5Qi9VGyikGQcI8kqmDHe/YenNfu5
 c0nunpzbw1HWkNeLpLrsnBL+D05zMZ3Zgkrao=
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Received: by 10.231.15.9 with SMTP id i9mr9220249iba.58.1283372793997; Wed,
 01
  Sep 2010 13:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
 Received: by 10.231.152.79 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
 In-Reply-To: 1283372614.16693.ez...@texascavers.com
 References: 1283372614.16693.ez...@texascavers.com
 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:26:33 -0500
 Message-ID: 
 aanlktim88qkbzx6-fayzhd+nthh5kjqyzodeinman...@mail.gmail.comaanlktim88qkbzx6-fayzhd%2bnthh5kjqyzodeinmanco...@mail.gmail.com
 
 Subject: Re: confirm subscribe to texascavers@texascavers.com
 From: Sheryl Rieck sheryl.ri...@gmail.com
 To: texascavers-sc.1283372614.lmlijlgghdlcpbgcfacg-sheryl.rieck=gmail.com@
 texascavers.com
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532ccc88029ad048f388354

 --00221532ccc88029ad048f388354
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1



 --00221532ccc88029ad048f388354
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

 br

 --00221532ccc88029ad048f388354--



[NMCAVER] Fw: [Texascavers] Little Brown Bats--WNS

2010-09-01 Thread Karen Perry


--- On Mon, 8/30/10, Gill Edigar gi...@att.net wrote:


From: Gill Edigar gi...@att.net
Subject: [Texascavers] Little Brown Bats--WNS
To: Cavers Texas texascavers@texascavers.com
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Monday, August 30, 2010, 7:13 AM


Fungus Likely to Wipe Out Common Bat in Northeast United States

Juicy bits:

Now, researchers report  in the 6 August issue of Science that the
rate of decline is so severe it could cause one bat species to vanish
from the northeastern United States within 16 years, potentially
hurting agriculture and forests.

In the team's worst-case scenario, which assumes that 45% of the
little brown bat population continues to die each winter, there is a
99% probability of regional extinction within 16 years. That hit us
like a brick, Kunz says. (The little brown bat lives throughout North
America, so the species itself won't go extinct). If mortality
declines to 10%, some little brown bats would last for 80 years, but
the population would be dramatically smaller.

Another stop-gap approach is for people in the northeast to build
simple bat houses. By offering smaller, warmer summer habitat for
bats, these houses could boost the odds that bats will reproduce
successfully, Kunz suggests. In the long term, the best hope is that
the bats develop resistance to the fungus. Kunz thinks there may be
hints that this is already happening in two colonies near Boston,
which have seen fewer bat deaths this past winter.

     
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/08/fungus-likely-to-wipe-out-common.html

     or http://tinyurl.com/24x3634

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




  
___
NMCAVER mailing list
nmca...@caver.net
http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/nmcaver_caver.net


[Texascavers] excellent compact caver car for sale (Austin)

2010-09-01 Thread Saj Zappitello
Howdy,

I am selling my 1994 Acura Integra. It is a 2-door hatchback, compact on the
outside, and with way more space on the inside than you would
expect--perfect for a caver looking for a compact car. I know we all love
our trucks, but sometimes a car is just more efficient. It had a new honda
engine put in by a mechanic that I trust just before I bought it a few years
ago, so it has a lot of life left in it. Black, manual transmission, AC
works, tinted windows, moonroof, drives great, some superficial dents to
exterior. $3000 firm.

I love this car and am sad to see it go. I would like to sell it to someone
who will enjoy it as much as I have.

Email me off list for pics and details sajar...@gmail.com.

~Saj


[Texascavers] Spanish 102 for cavers

2010-09-01 Thread David
Here is a real caving newsstory in Spanish that was posted a few days ago.

http://www.levante-emv.com/comunitat-valenciana/2010/08/14/espeleologos-valencianos-exploran-cueva-profunda-mundo/730685.html

You might be able to pick up a new Spanish word, if you try to read the article.

I don't know if the adjective todoterreno is used in Mexico, but in
Spain it is a person who is has excellent skills at everything.
So in this article, the caver being interviewed is describing his
colleague, Jorge Membado, ( who is in Krubera Cave ) as a caver
that is a skilled vertical caver.Do we have a single word in
English to describe such a caver?   The literal translation would be
he is an all-terrain guy.Maybe, he is a MacGyver?Or, he is
like a Swiss-Army Knife?

Todoterreno is not an easy word to pronounce for gringos.The
letter d is pronounced kind of like th, but with tip of
the tongue touching the whole roof of the mouth.   All the o's are
like in taco.The t's are different, also.
You have to move the tip of the tongue slightly back in the roof of
the mouth than you would in English.
And of course, you roll the rr.Both e's are like the e in egg.
   The letter n is not like in the English word no, but
more like in the way we pronounce the n in bologna ( sandwich ).
Also, the syllable te in the middle of the word
gets pronounced slightly louder than the rest of the word.

That is why when Spanish speakers speak perfectly good English it
still sounds funny.  Try teaching someone
who doesn't know English, why the 2 words:  closet and closed are
pronounced entirely different.Why is the s
pronounced like a z.It can be difficult to remember all those
kind of rules for a new English speaker.There
are fewer rules like that in Spanish. There is not a z sound in
Spanish, so this gives the Spanish speakers
trouble.

Not only do Spanish speakers coming here have difficulty with formal
English, they hear a large percentage
of Americans saying things, like Ima gonna gi-etchu, and you kain't
have dat, and the most popular
currently seems to be dayum.The one I hear a lot is, You can't
have no sex today.

David Locklear


Ref:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valencia,_Spain

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Spanish 102 for cavers

2010-09-01 Thread Nico Escamilla
ask anyone here who knows me if I sound funny.


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:45 PM, David dlocklea...@gmail.com wrote:


 That is why when Spanish speakers speak perfectly good English it
 still sounds funny.
 David Locklear


 Ref:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valencia,_Spain

 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




[Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread Robert B
After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been
thinking of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010.

Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of the
Olympus Tough models.

The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof waterproof
models over the point and shoot models. Is this feature just sales BS, do
they really hold up to abuse and is it worth the extra $$?

Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should I be
concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?

Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash? I know
it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not too compromised
for durability.

Thanks, Rob


Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread John Greer
We have tested this, and they aren't worth anything at all. They come apart 
just like any other camera when you drop it down a 120' pit. And they have 
just as many parts to pick up.

John Greer



- Original Message - 
From: Robert B
To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:21 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera


After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been 
thinking of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010.

Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of the 
Olympus Tough models.

The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof waterproof 
models over the point and shoot models. Is this feature just sales BS, do 
they really hold up to abuse and is it worth the extra $$?

Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should I be 
concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?

Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash? I know 
it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not too compromised 
for durability.

Thanks, Rob





Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread Allan B. Cobb
Sorry John, I beg to differ.  On most cameras, the plastic body shatters into 
millions of tiny pieces after a 120 foot drop but the metal body of the Tough 
Camera just turns into a twisted mass.  That equates to fewer parts to pick up.

Allan
  - Original Message - 
  From: John Greer 
  To: Texascavers@texascavers.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:44 PM
  Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera


  We have tested this, and they aren't worth anything at all. They come apart 
just like any other camera when you drop it down a 120' pit. And they have just 
as many parts to pick up. 

  John Greer



  - Original Message - 
  From: Robert B 
  To: Texascavers@texascavers.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:21 PM
  Subject: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera


  After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been thinking 
of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. 

  Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of the 
Olympus Tough models.

  The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof waterproof models 
over the point and shoot models. Is this feature just sales BS, do they really 
hold up to abuse and is it worth the extra $$? 

  Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should I be 
concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?

  Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash? I know 
it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not too compromised for 
durability.

  Thanks, Rob






--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3106 - Release Date: 09/01/10 
01:34:00


Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread Nico Escamilla
while I do not own the olympus I've seen one in action, they're pretty
decent but the picture quality leaves a lot to be desired.. its ok if you
plan to upload your photos to facebook where you cant zoom at all, but once
you zoom in 80% you'll see what Im talking about. Get the Cannon powershot
D10, similar or better performance and better picture quality.

Nico

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Allan B. Cobb a...@oztotl.com wrote:

  Sorry John, I beg to differ.  On most cameras, the plastic body shatters
 into millions of tiny pieces after a 120 foot drop but the metal body of the
 Tough Camera just turns into a twisted mass.  That equates to fewer parts to
 pick up.

 Allan

 - Original Message -
 *From:* John Greer jgr...@greerservices.com
 *To:* Texascavers@texascavers.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:44 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

 We have tested this, and they aren't worth anything at all. They come apart
 just like any other camera when you drop it down a 120' pit. And they have
 just as many parts to pick up.

 John Greer



 - Original Message -
 *From:* Robert B robert.c.b1...@gmail.com
 *To:* Texascavers@texascavers.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:21 PM
 *Subject:* [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

 After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been
 thinking of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010.

 Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of the
 Olympus Tough models.

 The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof waterproof
 models over the point and shoot models. Is this feature just sales BS, do
 they really hold up to abuse and is it worth the extra $$?

 Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should I be
 concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?

 Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash? I know
 it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not too compromised
 for durability.

 Thanks, Rob





 --


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3106 - Release Date: 09/01/10
 01:34:00




Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread Diana Tomchick
I like my Canon Powershot D10, it takes fine photos for a point-and- 
shoot. The Canon Powershots tend to have nicer lenses than the Olympus  
waterproof point-and-shoot cameras. I've taken mine into Honey Creek  
and other water caves, the biggest problem is you need a way to clean  
the mud off the lens cover before taking a photo, and it's subject to  
lens fogging, but what waterproof camera isn't? This camera does not  
have a hotshoe mount, but you can still use external flashes with the  
camera timer. I carry it on my belt in a small soft bag that was  
designed for a GPS. The drawback of this model is it's not small and  
rectangular (it's quite thick due to the waterproof housing for the  
zoom lens), so there's no small, precisely sized Otter Box or Pelican  
Case for it. If I need to protect it from shock, I put it inside a  
Darren drum instead.


Even the Olympus Tough Cameras will get damaged from a crushing blow;  
the LCD screens are often the weak point of the camera. Maybe you need  
to rethink how you carry your camera while in the cave. The Pentax  
Optio WP will fit nicely into a small Pelican case that can be clipped  
to a belt loop.


Diana

On Sep 1, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Nico Escamilla wrote:

while I do not own the olympus I've seen one in action, they're  
pretty decent but the picture quality leaves a lot to be desired..  
its ok if you plan to upload your photos to facebook where you cant  
zoom at all, but once you zoom in 80% you'll see what Im talking  
about. Get the Cannon powershot D10, similar or better performance  
and better picture quality.


Nico

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Allan B. Cobb a...@oztotl.com wrote:
Sorry John, I beg to differ.  On most cameras, the plastic body  
shatters into millions of tiny pieces after a 120 foot drop but the  
metal body of the Tough Camera just turns into a twisted mass.  That  
equates to fewer parts to pick up.


Allan
- Original Message -
From: John Greer
To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

We have tested this, and they aren't worth anything at all. They  
come apart just like any other camera when you drop it down a 120'  
pit. And they have just as many parts to pick up.


John Greer



- Original Message -
From: Robert B
To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:21 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been  
thinking of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010.


Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of  
the Olympus Tough models.


The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof  
waterproof models over the point and shoot models. Is this feature  
just sales BS, do they really hold up to abuse and is it worth the  
extra $$?


Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should  
I be concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?


Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash?  
I know it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not  
too compromised for durability.


Thanks, Rob







No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3106 - Release Date:  
09/01/10 01:34:00




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Diana R. Tomchick
Associate Professor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Department of Biochemistry
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Rm. ND10.214B   
Dallas, TX 75390-8816, U.S.A.   
Email: diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu
214-645-6383 (phone)
214-645-6353 (fax)


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread Herman Miller
Below photographs taken with Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9251644@N06/4525530367/
The above photo is an example of ample lighting conditions with a less then
amateur photographer

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9251644@N06/4526175096/
This photograph I included to illustrate the length of the attached flash.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9251644@N06/4525539023/
My absolute favorite photo ever taken

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Diana Tomchick 
diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu wrote:

 I like my Canon Powershot D10, it takes fine photos for a point-and-shoot.
 The Canon Powershots tend to have nicer lenses than the Olympus waterproof
 point-and-shoot cameras. I've taken mine into Honey Creek and other water
 caves, the biggest problem is you need a way to clean the mud off the lens
 cover before taking a photo, and it's subject to lens fogging, but what
 waterproof camera isn't? This camera does not have a hotshoe mount, but you
 can still use external flashes with the camera timer. I carry it on my belt
 in a small soft bag that was designed for a GPS. The drawback of this model
 is it's not small and rectangular (it's quite thick due to the waterproof
 housing for the zoom lens), so there's no small, precisely sized Otter Box
 or Pelican Case for it. If I need to protect it from shock, I put it inside
 a Darren drum instead.

 Even the Olympus Tough Cameras will get damaged from a crushing blow; the
 LCD screens are often the weak point of the camera. Maybe you need to
 rethink how you carry your camera while in the cave. The Pentax Optio WP
 will fit nicely into a small Pelican case that can be clipped to a belt
 loop.

 Diana


 On Sep 1, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Nico Escamilla wrote:

  while I do not own the olympus I've seen one in action, they're pretty
 decent but the picture quality leaves a lot to be desired.. its ok if you
 plan to upload your photos to facebook where you cant zoom at all, but once
 you zoom in 80% you'll see what Im talking about. Get the Cannon powershot
 D10, similar or better performance and better picture quality.

 Nico

 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Allan B. Cobb a...@oztotl.com wrote:
 Sorry John, I beg to differ.  On most cameras, the plastic body shatters
 into millions of tiny pieces after a 120 foot drop but the metal body of the
 Tough Camera just turns into a twisted mass.  That equates to fewer parts to
 pick up.

 Allan
 - Original Message -
 From: John Greer
 To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:44 PM
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

 We have tested this, and they aren't worth anything at all. They come
 apart just like any other camera when you drop it down a 120' pit. And they
 have just as many parts to pick up.

 John Greer



 - Original Message -
 From: Robert B
 To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:21 PM
 Subject: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

 After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been
 thinking of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010.

 Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of the
 Olympus Tough models.

 The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof waterproof
 models over the point and shoot models. Is this feature just sales BS, do
 they really hold up to abuse and is it worth the extra $$?

 Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should I be
 concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?

 Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash? I
 know it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not too
 compromised for durability.

 Thanks, Rob







 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3106 - Release Date: 09/01/10
 01:34:00


 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 Diana R. Tomchick
 Associate Professor
 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
 Department of Biochemistry
 5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
 Rm. ND10.214B
 Dallas, TX 75390-8816, U.S.A.
 Email: diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu
 214-645-6383 (phone)
 214-645-6353 (fax)


 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




[Texascavers] Re: Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread Mark Minton
We've been using the Canon PowerShot D10 for about a year 
now, and it takes much better pictures than other point-and-shoot 
cameras I've seen.  As Diana says, it's a bit thick, but that isn't 
generally a problem.  The fact that the flash is recessed relative to 
the lens makes for fewer of those white circles due to dust or water 
droplets that plague similar cameras.  It is quite robust and has 
held up well to caving with moderate care.  Several of my friends 
have adopted it and seem to like it.  I recommend it.


Mark Minton

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Diana Tomchick 
diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu wrote:
I like my Canon Powershot D10, it takes fine photos for a 
point-and-shoot. The Canon Powershots tend to have nicer lenses than 
the Olympus waterproof point-and-shoot cameras. I've taken mine into 
Honey Creek and other water caves, the biggest problem is you need a 
way to clean the mud off the lens cover before taking a photo, and 
it's subject to lens fogging, but what waterproof camera isn't? This 
camera does not have a hotshoe mount, but you can still use external 
flashes with the camera timer. I carry it on my belt in a small soft 
bag that was designed for a GPS. The drawback of this model is it's 
not small and rectangular (it's quite thick due to the waterproof 
housing for the zoom lens), so there's no small, precisely sized 
Otter Box or Pelican Case for it. If I need to protect it from 
shock, I put it inside a Darren drum instead.


Even the Olympus Tough Cameras will get damaged from a crushing 
blow; the LCD screens are often the weak point of the camera. Maybe 
you need to rethink how you carry your camera while in the cave. The 
Pentax Optio WP will fit nicely into a small Pelican case that can 
be clipped to a belt loop.


Diana

On Sep 1, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Nico Escamilla wrote:

while I do not own the olympus I've seen one in action, they're 
pretty decent but the picture quality leaves a lot to be desired.. 
its ok if you plan to upload your photos to facebook where you cant 
zoom at all, but once you zoom in 80% you'll see what Im talking 
about. Get the Cannon powershot D10, similar or better performance 
and better picture quality.


Nico

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Allan B. Cobb a...@oztotl.com wrote:
Sorry John, I beg to differ.  On most cameras, the plastic body 
shatters into millions of tiny pieces after a 120 foot drop but the 
metal body of the Tough Camera just turns into a twisted mass.  That 
equates to fewer parts to pick up.


Allan
- Original Message -
From: John Greer
To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

We have tested this, and they aren't worth anything at all. They 
come apart just like any other camera when you drop it down a 120' 
pit. And they have just as many parts to pick up.


John Greer

- Original Message -
From: Robert B
To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:21 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been 
thinking of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010.


Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of 
the Olympus Tough models.


The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof 
waterproof models over the point and shoot models. Is this feature 
just sales BS, do they really hold up to abuse and is it worth the extra $$?


Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should 
I be concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?


Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash? 
I know it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not 
too compromised for durability.


Thanks, Rob


Please reply to mmin...@caver.net
Permanent email address is mmin...@illinoisalumni.org 



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Opinions on Olympus Stylus Tough Camera

2010-09-01 Thread Chris Vreeland
Erin dropped hers from 2 feet, onto the wood floor and the screen  
cracked.


Not so tough.


On Sep 1, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Robert B wrote:

After recently damaging beyond repair 2 digital cameras, I have been  
thinking of getting an Olympus Stylus Tough 8010.


Would anybody care to share their opinions on this camera, or any of  
the Olympus Tough models.


The price is noticeably higher for these durable shockproof  
waterproof models over the point and shoot models. Is this feature  
just sales BS, do they really hold up to abuse and is it worth the  
extra $$?


Shockproof waterproof are one thing, but how about mud proof. Should  
I be concerned that mud may over time compromise the 'O' ring seals?


Does the camera take decent photos? How about cave photos and flash?  
I know it's not an SLR, but I'm hoping that picture quality is not  
too compromised for durability.


Thanks, Rob







-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] Pathfinder again

2010-09-01 Thread Chris Vreeland
No one on Craigslist wants this thing, either, so I'm going to make  
one more stab at Cavetex.


If anyone wants to spare this venerable caving vehicle the ignominy of  
going over the scales at Newell Salvage, (unless Carmax will take it,  
which I doubt) I'll entertain any offer, reasonable or unreasonable.  
It seems to me that an inspectable vehicle should be worth $500.00 so  
I'll start the asking there, but seriously, I just need this thing out  
of my driveway and off of my insurance.


In another week, it gets crushed.

1991 Nissan Pathfinder SE V6 4WD
Standard transmission
224,200 miles

---

Features:
Solid off-road performance -- great granny gear, climbs well, does  
okay in mud. Decent clearance.

17 mpg city / 21 hwy. if you don't drive like a maniac.
Yes, it has NO air conditioning. Needs compressor.
Better-than-average after-market stereo, w. 6x9's in the back   
Pioneer power amp. iPod™ ready.

Burns a little oil -- 1 quart per 500 miles, or so.
Just inspected today.
White color reflects heat and hides mud.
6 wheels - 5 full size, 1 space-saver bigger-than-donut, smaller- 
than-normal.
3 out of 4 electric windows roll both up and down. Passenger rear  
window is stuck up.

Pre-dented for your convenience.
Previous owner somehow managed to burn a perfect Oztotl into the dash  
with the cigarette lighter.

NSS life members can keep the yellow license plate dealie on the front.

Recent repairs:
Rear brake shoes and drums 2000 miles ago
Cap, rotor, spark plugs  wires  shock absorbers 4000 miles ago.
Clutch Master Cylinder, clutch slave cylinder, brake master cylinder  
9000 miles ago.


Needs:
Tires within 10,000 miles.
Some front-end work: mechanic suggested front axels. Probably ~$400.00  
worth of work.


I have a pretty complete repair history, and it has seen only two  
mechanics since I bought it -- Charlie Savvas, and Dave at Tower  
Automotive at 6th  Lamar.


Call Chris @512-289-3510 and DRIVE IT HOME TODAY!