[tw] Re: Foldable / extendable MainMenu possible?

[Morris Gray]

On Jun 6, 4:40 am, Eric Weir  wrote:

> I wonder if you could create a color theme for TWT/TWT-Treeview
> modeled on that of Blackicity?

Here it is http://twt-blackicity.tiddlyspot.com/

Morris



On Jun 6, 4:40 am, Eric Weir  wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Morris Gray wrote:
>
> > I highly recommend NestedSlidersPlugin for its versatility.  There is
> > also a brand new plugin fromhttp://treeview.tiddlyspot.com/that has
> > an Explorer look to it.
>
> > You can see a full implementation of it 
> > herehttp://twt-treeview.tiddlyspot.com/
> > it has a few switchable themes as a demo.
>
> I feel guilty asking, this Morris, since I'm capable of contributing  
> next-to-nothing to enhancements of TiddlyWiki, but I wonder if you  
> could create a color theme for TWT/TWT-Treeview modeled on that of  
> Blackicity? 
>
> Thanks -- either way, i.e., even for just entertaining the idea.
>
> Sincerely,
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] Re: Foldable / extendable MainMenu possible?

[Eric Weir]

On Jun 6, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Morris Gray wrote:

> On Jun 6, 4:40 am, Eric Weir  wrote:
>
>> I wonder if you could create a color theme for TWT/TWT-Treeview
>> modeled on that of Blackicity?
>
> Here it is http://twt-blackicity.tiddlyspot.com/

Wow, Morris! That's great! I love the Blackicity theme -- from Saq  
Imtiaz -- but it's just that, a theme. Pretty plain, as far as  
functionality goes. But that was OK. Relatively easy to tweak. Just  
add in the things I want.

But there's a pretty low limit to tweaking if it has to be done by me.  
TWT and TWT-Treeview have a lot of what I want. Now I've got that and  
a theme I like. I think I'm set for a while.

For any lurking -- or non-lurking -- newcomers here, this is typical  
of the kindness and generosity of TiddlyWiki Google Group. Ask and you  
shall receive.

Of course that means we have to give back to the best of our ability.  
Hopefully mine will improve.

Sincerely,
--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net





--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

The end of NET? (was: [tw] Re: now Alternate Time Systems in TW- major thread drift.)

[Dirk Zemisch]

Hallo rtimwest,

rtimwest  schrieb am 04.06.2009 16:17 Uhr:
> I contacted the folks at New Earth Time through their web page about
> the apparent conflict between the GPL(s), Creative Commons License,
> and their copyright notice that states that explicit permission must
> be obtained in order to "distribute" or use NET commercially. AFAIK,
> the Creative Commons License allows commercial use, and the GPL does,
> but with stipulations intended to ENSURE free distribution, not
> restrict it.

English is not my native language (far from it), but I understand the
statement on the NET website as focussed on 'commercialization', not
distributing. But I'm fully agree with your arguments that this point
needs a clear explanation from degree NET Ltd.

The used terminology ('The [...] concept is intellectual property of')
doesn't sound like an invitation to use the concept.

> I received a short but polite response from Mark Laugesen, who has
> "New Earth Time, Canberra" in his e-mail sig. He expressed some
> interest in TiddlyWiki, and also expressed regret at the situation,
> but made no concrete offers or promises to change anything.

In my humble opinion ist doesn't help - nor you for distributing the
plugin, neither the propagation of NET.

> I'm not all all certain that they could make this stick- it seems to
> me unlikely that dividing the day into 360 units is the sort of thing
> that can be protected by copyright, although they can probably at
> least do that with the name. The CONCEPT would only be patentable (in
> theory) if there were no prior examples... but IANAL, and have no
> vested interest in contesting their claims or promoting their idea
> against their wishes.

I'm fully agree and I'm sure, that there are a lot of regions on earth
where such concepts never will get a protection by law.

> Accordingly, the prototype program NETTimePlugin has been removed from
> my accessible sites, even in it's pre-release form, even though it was
> not linked to, to prevent any possibility of "distribution".

It's a pity! Again for both - te concept and your implemtation. But I
understand your irritations and support this decision.

Regards!
Dirk
-- 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[tw] Re: how do you transclude a custom field?

[Dave Parker]

Those multiple ways of writing fields in a FET will be handy, as will
the ability to edit fields in a pop-up (assuming that's what you're
talking about in the first part)

Thank you cmari,
-Dave

On Jun 5, 8:17 pm, cmari  wrote:
> One (somewhat inelegant) method for viewing and editiing the fields of
> Tiddler1 from inside Tiddler2 (i.e., in transclusion):
> 1. Get the FieldsEditorPlugin (http://visualtw.ouvaton.org/
> VisualTW.html)
> 2. In the text of Tiddler1 (which contains the field[s] that you will
> want to view in transclusion), add the macro:
> <>
> 3. Once you've done that, if you put the macro <> 
> inside Tiddler2, you'll be able to click the "fields" button to
>
> display and change the fields in Tiddler1.
>
> There are at least three different ways to show the contents of custom
> fields if you're using fET (though this is obviously not transclusion
> anymore):
> 1
> write '"<\>"'
> 2
> write 'store.getValue(tiddler,"myfieldname")'
> 3
> write '(tiddler.fields["myfieldname"])'
>
> cmari
>
> On Jun 5, 6:28 pm, Dave Parker  wrote:
>
>
>
> > Can I assume that you can write a <> macro by FET?  (I'll
> > try it anyway, but that's the first question that comes to mind)
>
> > Thanks very much!
> > Dave
>
> > p.s.  just curious - is this ability likely to be written into the
> > core like the slice and section transclusions?  It seems like it
> > should be, but what do I know?
>
> > On Jun 5, 5:15 pm, Eric Shulman  wrote:
>
> > > > I tried <> but that didn't work...
>
> > >    http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#WikifyPlugin
> > > allows you to easily produce formatted output from values stored in
> > > tiddler fields, tiddler slices, internal variables, literal constants,
> > > and/or computed macro parameters
>
> > > For your given use-case, you could write:
> > >    <>
>
> > > The first macro param defines the desired output format, and can
> > > contain any text you want, along with embedded "substitution markers":
> > > %0, %1, %2, , %9.  The remaining macro params specify the
> > > corresponding values to be inserted in place of the markers.  In this
> > > particular case, the format is just "%0", meaning that the first
> > > parameter value (fieldn...@tiddlername) will simply be output by
> > > itself without any other static text.
>
> > > Note: the implementation of the "fieldn...@tiddlername" syntax is
> > > provided directly by WikifyPlugin, and therefore cannot be used in any
> > > of the standard TW core macros where simple fieldnames are expected
> > > (e.g., <>, <>, etc.).  However, you
> > > *can* use this enhanced syntax within the <> macro that is
> > > defined by TiddlyTools' ListboxPlugin, so that it can also set/use
> > > values stored as custom fields in other tiddlers.
>
> > > enjoy,
> > > -e
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] alltags macro help

[Dave Gifford - http://www.giffmex.org/]

Hi all

Supposedly there is a way to customize the allTags macro so that it
excludes tags that you indicate.

I must be doing it wrong. Any help? How would I show all tags but

Tag1
Tag2
Tag3

?

Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] Re: tid...@mobile

[Marty]

It's slow, but I can access my MonkeyGTD 2.1 Tiddly on my Windows 6.1
(HTC Touch Pro) just fine.

On Jun 3, 2:35 am, Dirk Zemisch  wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> just an easy question: anybody tried to run the Tiddly @ mobile phones
> or PDA? I'm using Symbian and Palm here and it could be nice to use it
> on these devices.
>
> Before I try by myself to use Tiddly there, I would like to know about
> others experience for that case.
>
> So long,
> Dirk
> --
>
>  signature.asc
> < 1KViewDownload
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] Re: alltags macro help

[Dave Gifford]

Ah, I get it. You have to create tiddlers like Tag1, Tag2, etc first,
then tag those tiddlers excludeLists, then use the macro <> so that the tags represented by those tiddler titles
won't appear. Thanks to all those who thought about helping before I
figured it out myself!

Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] Unusual implementation situation

[Alan Cohen]

I recently started a long-term project at a client that doesn't allow ANY
media to be brought in or any saving/downloading from the internet.  They do
however have an internal software library which end users can download from
and use.  There is an older version of GdTiddlyWiki in there which I have
started to use, but it could be better.  It is legal for me to bring in
paper with words printed on it; I'm looking for some guidance as to how to
bring this older version up to date by comparing current versions of CSS and
tiddlers to the versions currently inside security, but I don't know where
to start. I would think it would be better to upgrade the base before adding
new stuff to it.  Since I only have local access on this machine and expect
it to be single user only, I might not need anything that enhances
cross-machine access.  I would also think this might be of interest to other
people who would like to understand the internals better.

Any suggestions would be appreciated (like which tiddlers to start with,
order of which ones to update, etc.).

-- 
Alan B. Cohen

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] Re: Unusual implementation situation

[Alex Hough]

Can you get e-mail attachments? Mail a TW?
Do you mean 'GTD TiddlyWiki'?

ALex

2009/6/6 Alan Cohen 

> I recently started a long-term project at a client that doesn't allow ANY
> media to be brought in or any saving/downloading from the internet.  They do
> however have an internal software library which end users can download from
> and use.  There is an older version of GdTiddlyWiki in there which I have
> started to use, but it could be better.  It is legal for me to bring in
> paper with words printed on it; I'm looking for some guidance as to how to
> bring this older version up to date by comparing current versions of CSS and
> tiddlers to the versions currently inside security, but I don't know where
> to start. I would think it would be better to upgrade the base before adding
> new stuff to it.  Since I only have local access on this machine and expect
> it to be single user only, I might not need anything that enhances
> cross-machine access.  I would also think this might be of interest to other
> people who would like to understand the internals better.
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated (like which tiddlers to start with,
> order of which ones to update, etc.).
>
> --
> Alan B. Cohen
>
> >
>


-- 
http://www.multiurl.com/g/64

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] TiddlyTasks - needs volunteers

[Nadav]

Hi,

please have a look at TiddlyTasks  
http://nadigo.com/TiddlyTasks/TiddlyTasks.html

if someone care to give a hand, i would like to get a server version
of it up.

please let me know.

nadigo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] found the cause of totally mangled TiddlyWikis

[pat toche]

Thanks to an older post by FND* I was able to identify why I was
unable to view TiddlyWikis from the office.

I quote FND:

This might be of interest:
 http://tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Corruption
 http://tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Greasemonkey

-- F.

and tiddlywiki.org:

The most likely cause for this is the respective network (e.g. in a
corporate environment) filtering the incoming traffic due to the use
of JavaScript.

Useful info that is well worth recording here once again. If you're
having problems, follow the links above: they offer a fix that may
work for you.

Thanks FND.

Patrick.

*
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki/browse_thread/thread/faa229182508c745/dffe8d3c48f450bf?lnk=gst&q=how+to+download#dffe8d3c48f450bf
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: The end of NET? (was: [tw] Re: now Alternate Time Systems in TW- major thread drift.)

[rtimwest]

Dirk,

Please don't apologize, you write far better in English than I do in
any other language.

I agree with you that the situation is unclear, and the response I got
did not help.

I also regret that I cannot include NET in the final package. If they
clarify the IP situation, or adopt a real license, I will of course
reconsider then.

As I said to them, I do not think there is any chance of widespread
adoption of a timekeeping system if explicit permission is required
for distribution OR commercial use. The response I received did not
point out any mis-interpretation.

Best,

Tim West




On Jun 6, 11:10 am, Dirk Zemisch  wrote:
> Hallo rtimwest,
>
> rtimwest  schrieb am 04.06.2009 16:17 Uhr:
>
> > I contacted the folks at New Earth Time through their web page about
> > the apparent conflict between the GPL(s), Creative Commons License,
> > and their copyright notice that states that explicit permission must
> > be obtained in order to "distribute" or use NET commercially. AFAIK,
> > the Creative Commons License allows commercial use, and the GPL does,
> > but with stipulations intended to ENSURE free distribution, not
> > restrict it.
>
> English is not my native language (far from it), but I understand the
> statement on the NET website as focussed on 'commercialization', not
> distributing. But I'm fully agree with your arguments that this point
> needs a clear explanation from degree NET Ltd.
>
> The used terminology ('The [...] concept is intellectual property of')
> doesn't sound like an invitation to use the concept.
>
> > I received a short but polite response from Mark Laugesen, who has
> > "New Earth Time, Canberra" in his e-mail sig. He expressed some
> > interest in TiddlyWiki, and also expressed regret at the situation,
> > but made no concrete offers or promises to change anything.
>
> In my humble opinion ist doesn't help - nor you for distributing the
> plugin, neither the propagation of NET.
>
> > I'm not all all certain that they could make this stick- it seems to
> > me unlikely that dividing the day into 360 units is the sort of thing
> > that can be protected by copyright, although they can probably at
> > least do that with the name. The CONCEPT would only be patentable (in
> > theory) if there were no prior examples... but IANAL, and have no
> > vested interest in contesting their claims or promoting their idea
> > against their wishes.
>
> I'm fully agree and I'm sure, that there are a lot of regions on earth
> where such concepts never will get a protection by law.
>
> > Accordingly, the prototype program NETTimePlugin has been removed from
> > my accessible sites, even in it's pre-release form, even though it was
> > not linked to, to prevent any possibility of "distribution".
>
> It's a pity! Again for both - te concept and your implemtation. But I
> understand your irritations and support this decision.
>
> Regards!
> Dirk
> --
>
>  signature.asc
> < 1KViewDownload
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] Re: Foldable / extendable MainMenu possible?

[Morris Gray]

On Jun 7, 12:13 am, Eric Weir  wrote:

> Of course that means we have to give back to the best of our ability.
> Hopefully mine will improve.

Never mind Eric, we are quite happy with your soul ;-)

Morris

On Jun 7, 12:13 am, Eric Weir  wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Morris Gray wrote:
>
> > On Jun 6, 4:40 am, Eric Weir  wrote:
>
> >> I wonder if you could create a color theme for TWT/TWT-Treeview
> >> modeled on that of Blackicity?
>
> > Here it ishttp://twt-blackicity.tiddlyspot.com/
>
> Wow, Morris! That's great! I love the Blackicity theme -- from Saq  
> Imtiaz -- but it's just that, a theme. Pretty plain, as far as  
> functionality goes. But that was OK. Relatively easy to tweak. Just  
> add in the things I want.
>
> But there's a pretty low limit to tweaking if it has to be done by me.  
> TWT and TWT-Treeview have a lot of what I want. Now I've got that and  
> a theme I like. I think I'm set for a while.
>
> For any lurking -- or non-lurking -- newcomers here, this is typical  
> of the kindness and generosity of TiddlyWiki Google Group. Ask and you  
> shall receive.
>
> Of course that means we have to give back to the best of our ability.  
> Hopefully mine will improve.
>
> Sincerely,
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[tw] Re: TiddlyTasks - needs volunteers

[pat toche]

Can't help with the server business unfortunately, as I'm a total
newbie.

I noticed you're using TiddlersBarPlugin. The default behavior is that
when you click on the little tab it will close other tiddlers. I
prefer that it will do nothing instead. Visitors to the TW who are
unfamiliar with the whole concept find this default behavior
unsettling -- "what have I done, where have my tiddlers gone?" It's
purely a matter of taste, of course. As I just learned the following
trick I thought I'd share it, just in case. It's pretty trivial as far
as tricks go.

In the TiddlersBarPlugin tiddler (or in the StyleSheetTiddlersBar if
you can work out how to do that -- I couldn't) , change the following:



config.options.txtSelectedTiddlerTabButton =
config.options.txtSelectedTiddlerTabButton ?
config.options.txtSelectedTiddlerTabButton : "do nothing";

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: The end of NET? (was: [tw] Re: now Alternate Time Systems in TW- major thread drift.)

[Morris Gray]

On Jun 7, 10:46 am, rtimwest  wrote:

> As I said to them, I do not think there is any chance of widespread
> adoption of a timekeeping system if explicit permission is required
> for distribution OR commercial use. The response I received did not
> point out any mis-interpretation.

Well Tim,

I am not prepared to leave it there; in limbo.  Forward me a copy of
your correspondence (off list) with them and I will take up the
cause.  It is their responsibility to clarify the situation once and
for all in the affirmative for us.

My approach will be that I am, and will be, using and distributing the
NET time concept on a not-for-profit basis.  I will give them due
credit for trademarks and copyright.(even though they have failed to
renew their copyright since 2006)

If I don't hear otherwise then I am alternatively taking up their
offer as stated on their website to use NET for free and non-
commercial purposes, which includes, but not limited to, anything that
falls under the most broad not-for-profit definition.

Further, I cannot, and will not, under any circumstances accept
responsible for what other people, who have been duly informed of the
legal rights involved might choose to to do with such information.  If
they should see any abuse of their rights then they have recourse
under whatever laws may apply to whatever jurisdiction.

While I believe that they may have legally obtained a copyright for
their web site and a trademark for their names, neither of these
extends to the fact that a 24 hour clock normally traverses 360
degrees and that can be neither be copyrighted nor trademarked.

Nor can anyone be prevented from drawing a connection between the 360
degrees of the circle a 24 hour inscribes and discussing it and
broadcasting such ideas with complete freedom from restriction.

My final arbitrator will be their own offer to the public to use New
Earth Time for free.  Or I will see them in court whichever comes
first, since I have been there for similar reasons more often than
they have.

Send me your correspondence, please

Morris





On Jun 7, 10:46 am, rtimwest  wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> Please don't apologize, you write far better in English than I do in
> any other language.
>
> I agree with you that the situation is unclear, and the response I got
> did not help.
>
> I also regret that I cannot include NET in the final package. If they
> clarify the IP situation, or adopt a real license, I will of course
> reconsider then.
>
> As I said to them, I do not think there is any chance of widespread
> adoption of a timekeeping system if explicit permission is required
> for distribution OR commercial use. The response I received did not
> point out any mis-interpretation.
>
> Best,
>
> Tim West
>
> On Jun 6, 11:10 am, Dirk Zemisch  wrote:
>
> > Hallo rtimwest,
>
> > rtimwest  schrieb am 04.06.2009 16:17 Uhr:
>
> > > I contacted the folks at New Earth Time through their web page about
> > > the apparent conflict between the GPL(s), Creative Commons License,
> > > and their copyright notice that states that explicit permission must
> > > be obtained in order to "distribute" or use NET commercially. AFAIK,
> > > the Creative Commons License allows commercial use, and the GPL does,
> > > but with stipulations intended to ENSURE free distribution, not
> > > restrict it.
>
> > English is not my native language (far from it), but I understand the
> > statement on the NET website as focussed on 'commercialization', not
> > distributing. But I'm fully agree with your arguments that this point
> > needs a clear explanation from degree NET Ltd.
>
> > The used terminology ('The [...] concept is intellectual property of')
> > doesn't sound like an invitation to use the concept.
>
> > > I received a short but polite response from Mark Laugesen, who has
> > > "New Earth Time, Canberra" in his e-mail sig. He expressed some
> > > interest in TiddlyWiki, and also expressed regret at the situation,
> > > but made no concrete offers or promises to change anything.
>
> > In my humble opinion ist doesn't help - nor you for distributing the
> > plugin, neither the propagation of NET.
>
> > > I'm not all all certain that they could make this stick- it seems to
> > > me unlikely that dividing the day into 360 units is the sort of thing
> > > that can be protected by copyright, although they can probably at
> > > least do that with the name. The CONCEPT would only be patentable (in
> > > theory) if there were no prior examples... but IANAL, and have no
> > > vested interest in contesting their claims or promoting their idea
> > > against their wishes.
>
> > I'm fully agree and I'm sure, that there are a lot of regions on earth
> > where such concepts never will get a protection by law.
>
> > > Accordingly, the prototype program NETTimePlugin has been removed from
> > > my accessible sites, even in it's pre-release form, even though it was
> > > not linked to, to prevent any possibility of "distribution".
>
> > It's a pity! Again