RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








 

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:23
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Iz:No camera needed. Just 'read me' on TT. Case closed.





 





Listen, Iz, my dear--why is it that political discussions
get you all in a knot while discussions pertaining to the 'faith once delivered
to the saints'  leave you with a sense of indifference?





 Some things are easier to
figure out than others. J Iz





 







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
15:04





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



Listen, Lance, my dear—why is it that every time I make a
point you just clam up? What is YOUR POINT??? 

 

It seems to me that whenever Liberals are too inarticulate to
articulate what, specifically, they don’t like about GWB, they accuse HIM
of being “inarticulate”.  And
whenever they are unable to intelligently discuss exactly why they disagree
with his policies, they call HIM “stupid”.  Why is it that Liberals avoid discussing
ISSUES, and instead ATTACK those that they disagree with?  Is this living according to the Law of Love?
Izzy

 

PS You said that you prefer an “immoral JFK to a moral
GWB”.  Why IS that???  It seems that the only thing you have
mentioned that you disagree with GWB about is the war in Iraq.  Ever hear of the Bay of
 Pigs?  Ever hear of Vietnam?
 

 

PPS  If someone followed YOU
around with a camera with the intention of making YOU look
stupid/inept/unintelligent, do you think they would have any problem
accomplishing their goal??? 

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:23
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Iz:No.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
14:15





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



I think you are alluding to “moral-ism” as a religion
or substitute for Godly righteousness. 
Making moral choices is not moral-ism, but morality, or doing right, or
righteousness, or morals-in-action, or godliness, or……...So do you
think morality is of the devil? Izzy

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:05
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Iz:Tell me the difference, as you see it, then I'll give you
an answer.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
13:56





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:34
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a "moral" president? An
acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to a "moral"
neighbor and to an "immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said he)
I'd always choose the former." So
what’s the point?  Moral(ism)
is, in my opinion, of the Devil. Do
you also believe morality is of the devil? Izzy







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:41





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



How about a “moral” President? Izzy

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Izzy:No! This is not an example of a 'godly' president.It is
however, a moral choice with which I heartily concur.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:13





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

Example of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay
Pride Month, thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   Izzy


















Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread LaurHamm



In a message dated 6/15/2004 1:28:25 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Just for the record.  I was at a concert to support Compassion International and Amy Grant was one of the singers - (I mainly went to hear Mercy Me)  She gave quite a testimony and spoke about her sin and restoration.  Laura Doesn't move me.   The plan for most in her situation is to go ahead and commit the deed, then repent after she /he has destroyed whatever is in her/his way, collected and possessed the benefit, and in general made a mockery of the Lordship of Christ. John 
Your choice to judge as you want.  I choose to let God do the judging.  Laura


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Iz:No camera needed. Just 'read me' on TT. Case 
closed.
 
Listen, Iz, my dear--why is it that political 
discussions get you all in a knot while discussions pertaining to the 'faith 
once delivered to the saints'  leave you with a sense of 
indifference?
 
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 15:04
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
  Listen, 
  Lance, my dear—why is it that every time I make a point you just clam up? What 
  is YOUR POINT??? 
   
  It 
  seems to me that whenever Liberals are too inarticulate to articulate what, 
  specifically, they don’t like about GWB, they accuse HIM of being 
  “inarticulate”.  And whenever they 
  are unable to intelligently discuss exactly why they disagree with his 
  policies, they call HIM “stupid”.  
  Why is it that Liberals avoid discussing 
  ISSUES, and instead ATTACK those that they disagree with?  Is this living according to the Law of 
  Love? Izzy
   
  PS 
  You said that you prefer an “immoral JFK to a moral GWB”.  Why IS that???  It seems that the only thing you have 
  mentioned that you disagree with GWB about is the war in Iraq.  Ever hear of the Bay of Pigs?  
  Ever hear of Vietnam?  
   
  PPS  If 
  someone followed YOU around with a camera with the intention of making YOU 
  look stupid/inept/unintelligent, do you think they would have any problem 
  accomplishing their goal??? 
   
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 
  2004 12:23 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
   
  
  Iz:No.
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Sent: June 
15, 2004 14:15

    Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] President George Bush

 
I 
think you are alluding to “moral-ism” as a religion or substitute for Godly 
righteousness.  Making moral 
choices is not moral-ism, but morality, or doing right, or righteousness, or 
morals-in-action, or godliness, or……...So do you think morality is of the 
devil? Izzy
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:05 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President 
George Bush
 

Iz:Tell me the difference, as 
you see it, then I'll give you an answer.

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  Sent: June 
  15, 2004 13:56
  
  Subject: RE: 
      [TruthTalk] President George Bush
  
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:34 
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President 
  George Bush
   
  
  OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a 
  "moral" president? An acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to 
  a "moral" neighbor and to an "immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said 
  he) I'd always choose the former." So what’s the point?  Moral(ism) is, in my 
  opinion, of the Devil. Do 
  you also believe morality is of the devil? 
  Izzy
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

    
    Sent: 
    June 15, 2004 11:41

Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] President George Bush

 
How 
about a “moral” President? Izzy
 




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21 
    AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President 
George Bush
 

Izzy:No! This is not an 
example of a 'godly' president.It is however, a moral choice with which 
I heartily concur.

  
  - Original Message 
  - 
  
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  To: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
      Sent: 
      June 15, 2004 11:13
  
  Subject: 
  RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
   
   
  Example 
  of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay Pride Month, 
  thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   
  Izzy


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread LaurHamm



In a message dated 6/15/2004 1:48:11 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



A frequent story by those who intended to do wrong, did it, and intended to be âforgiven and restoredâ all along.  That does not change the fact that they are living in an adulterous relationship to this day (if they did not divorce on Biblical grounds).  Izzy
 
I'm not condoning what happened - just saying that the Lord appears to be using her and even though I don't buy her music, I did not walk out because she stepped up to the stage.  Laura


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








Listen, Lance, my dear—why is it that every time I make a
point you just clam up? What is YOUR POINT??? 

 

It seems to me that whenever Liberals are too inarticulate to
articulate what, specifically, they don’t like about GWB, they accuse HIM
of being “inarticulate”.  And
whenever they are unable to intelligently discuss exactly why they disagree
with his policies, they call HIM “stupid”.  Why is it that
Liberals avoid discussing ISSUES, and instead ATTACK those that they disagree
with?  Is this living according to the
Law of Love? Izzy

 

PS You said that you prefer an “immoral JFK to a moral GWB”.  Why IS that???  It seems that the only thing you have
mentioned that you disagree with GWB about is the war in Iraq.  Ever hear of the Bay of
 Pigs?  Ever hear of Vietnam?  

 

PPS 
If someone followed YOU around with a camera with the intention of
making YOU look stupid/inept/unintelligent, do you think they would have any
problem accomplishing their goal??? 

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:23
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Iz:No.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
14:15





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



I think you are alluding to “moral-ism” as a religion
or substitute for Godly righteousness. 
Making moral choices is not moral-ism, but morality, or doing right, or
righteousness, or morals-in-action, or godliness, or……...So do you
think morality is of the devil? Izzy

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:05
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Iz:Tell me the difference, as you see it, then I'll give you
an answer.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
13:56





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:34
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a "moral" president? An
acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to a "moral"
neighbor and to an "immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said he)
I'd always choose the former." So
what’s the point?  Moral(ism)
is, in my opinion, of the Devil. Do
you also believe morality is of the devil? Izzy







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:41





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



How about a “moral” President? Izzy

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Izzy:No! This is not an example of a 'godly' president.It is
however, a moral choice with which I heartily concur.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:13





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

Example of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay
Pride Month, thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   Izzy
















[TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Judy Taylor



No it doesn't work for the JW's - they are a cult, so 
nothing that matters is working for them.  Also shunning is no 
more  God's way than stealing another woman's husband because it breaks the 'royal law'  If I had occasion to meet 
Amy Grant in a social situation by His grace I would be able to walk in 
love toward her.  However, like John, I don't 
choose to spend money buying her CD's nor do I choose to sit under her 
ministry or be entertained by her.
 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judyt:I'd say let's 'shun 'em'. It works for the 
JW's. I believe that all reconciliation should only be 
partial.

  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  Thanks for sharing your 
  perception/experience John.  I've seen too much of this in christian 
  circles and you don't
  very often hear from the one who was hurt.  I 
  used to like Amy Grant's music but have no heart for it anymore.
  She may be forgiven and restored in her relationship 
  with God but I wonder if it would  be better for the body of
  Christ and unbelievers who may be influenced also 
  if prominent people who have been involved in this 
  kind of 
  thing just quietly disappeared, retired, or 
  whatever.  judyt 
   
   
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  In a message dated 6/15/2004 7:02:10 AM Pacific 
  Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:John:Disagree vehemently! God 
  didn't stop listening to them and, neither have I. Vehemently?!  
  Wow.  It is not a salvation issue with me.   But it is a 
  leadership issue.   Leaders in the church are to be above the 
  fray.   And I know that gospel singer is not a leader in the same 
  sense as a prophet, teacher, preacher or elder.   But with Amy, I 
  just can't buy her albums.   I know something about the situation 
  between her and Pretty Boy.  I saw the hurt in Chapman's  face (Gary 
  Chapman is or was her husband, right?).  I have been through that same 
  kind of disception and have no heart for those who pretend to be what they are 
  not.   I also do not watch movies about divorce, comedy or 
  otherwise.  Personal preference.  God has not stopped listen to 
  Amy  but I have.  I had just bought an album by Pretty Boy, 
  too.  It has never been opened.  
John


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 6/15/2004 11:38:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I'd say let's 'shun 'em'. It works for the JW's. I believe that all reconciliation should only be partial.

So partial reconciliation would just be con - ciliation.   Con game,  Con vict.  Maybe not funny but I am trying.

J


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 6/15/2004 11:30:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Thanks for sharing your perception/experience John.  I've seen too much of this in christian circles and you don't
 very often hear from the one who was hurt.  I used to like Amy Grant's music but have no heart for it anymore.
 She may be forgiven and restored in her relationship with God but I wonder if it would  be better for the body of
 Christ and unbelievers who may be influenced also if prominent people who have been involved in this kind of 
thing just quietly disappeared, retired, or whatever.  judyt 
  


Thank you.   I did not mean to come on strong against what Laura had said.  All this is about a personal bias. The kids mom of 23 years knew exactly what she was doing and knew that the church had "no choice but to forgive her" when she came asking  --  and she is right.   It is not even a matter of forgiveness for me  --  you just get hurt beyond your ability to deal with it as you should.  It is never on my mind but when she walks into a room in my presense, its 1987 all over again  -- same rage and all.   I control it.   

We have 5 awesome kids.   It has effected each in a different way.   But things are good now and my wife of 3 years is one of the most dedicated Christians I have every known.   Too bad she got the dirty end of the stick with me  -- but I don;t care.   


I have a smile on my face and in my heart most of the time.   


Thanks again. 

a brother, John






Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Iz:No.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 14:15
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
  I 
  think you are alluding to “moral-ism” as a religion or substitute for Godly 
  righteousness.  Making moral 
  choices is not moral-ism, but morality, or doing right, or righteousness, or 
  morals-in-action, or godliness, or……...So do you think morality is of the 
  devil? Izzy
   
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:05 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
   
  
  Iz:Tell me the difference, as you 
  see it, then I'll give you an answer.
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Sent: June 
15, 2004 13:56

Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] President George Bush

 
 
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:34 
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President 
George Bush
 

OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a 
"moral" president? An acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to a 
"moral" neighbor and to an "immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said he) 
I'd always choose the former." So 
what’s the point?  
Moral(ism) is, in my opinion, of the Devil. Do you also believe morality is of the 
devil? Izzy

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  Sent: June 
  15, 2004 11:41
  
  Subject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] President George Bush
  
   
  How 
  about a “moral” President? Izzy
   
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21 
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President 
  George Bush
   
  
  Izzy:No! This is not an 
  example of a 'godly' president.It is however, a moral choice with which I 
  heartily concur.
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Sent: 
    June 15, 2004 11:13

Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] President George Bush

 
 
Example 
of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay Pride Month, 
thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   
Izzy


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



John:Ouch!(again)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 14:07
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  In a message dated 6/15/2004 9:48:14 AM Pacific 
  Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  Just for the record.  I was at a concert to support 
Compassion International and Amy Grant was one of the singers - (I mainly 
went to hear Mercy Me)  She gave quite a testimony and spoke about her 
sin and restoration.  Laura Doesn't move 
  me.   The plan for most in her situation is to go ahead and commit 
  the deed, then repent after she /he has destroyed whatever is in her/his way, 
  collected and possessed the benefit, and in general made a mockery of the 
  Lordship of Christ. John 


[TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Judy Taylor



Thanks for sharing your perception/experience 
John.  I've seen too much of this in christian circles and you 
don't
very often hear from the one who was hurt.  I used 
to like Amy Grant's music but have no heart for it anymore.
She may be forgiven and restored in her relationship 
with God but I wonder if it would  be better for the body of
Christ and unbelievers who may be influenced also 
if prominent people who have been involved in this 
kind of 
thing just quietly disappeared, retired, or 
whatever.  judyt 
 
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 6/15/2004 7:02:10 AM Pacific 
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:John:Disagree vehemently! God 
didn't stop listening to them and, neither have I. Vehemently?!  Wow.  
It is not a salvation issue with me.   But it is a leadership 
issue.   Leaders in the church are to be above the fray.   
And I know that gospel singer is not a leader in the same sense as a prophet, 
teacher, preacher or elder.   But with Amy, I just can't buy her 
albums.   I know something about the situation between her and Pretty 
Boy.  I saw the hurt in Chapman's  face (Gary Chapman is or was her 
husband, right?).  I have been through that same kind of disception and 
have no heart for those who pretend to be what they are not.   I also 
do not watch movies about divorce, comedy or otherwise.  Personal 
preference.  God has not stopped listen to Amy  but I have.  
I had just bought an album by Pretty Boy, too.  It has never been 
opened.  John


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 6/15/2004 11:28:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

John:Ouch!(again)


Usually I am a really sweet guy, too.

John


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Judyt:I'd say let's 'shun 'em'. It works for the 
JW's. I believe that all reconciliation should only be 
partial.

  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 14:29
  Subject: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  Thanks for sharing your perception/experience 
  John.  I've seen too much of this in christian circles and you 
  don't
  very often hear from the one who was hurt.  I 
  used to like Amy Grant's music but have no heart for it anymore.
  She may be forgiven and restored in her relationship 
  with God but I wonder if it would  be better for the body of
  Christ and unbelievers who may be influenced also 
  if prominent people who have been involved in this 
  kind of 
  thing just quietly disappeared, retired, or 
  whatever.  judyt 
   
   
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  In a message dated 6/15/2004 7:02:10 AM Pacific Daylight 
  Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:John:Disagree vehemently! God didn't 
  stop listening to them and, neither have I. Vehemently?!  
  Wow.  It is not a salvation issue with me.   But it is a 
  leadership issue.   Leaders in the church are to be above the 
  fray.   And I know that gospel singer is not a leader in the same 
  sense as a prophet, teacher, preacher or elder.   But with Amy, I 
  just can't buy her albums.   I know something about the situation 
  between her and Pretty Boy.  I saw the hurt in Chapman's  face (Gary 
  Chapman is or was her husband, right?).  I have been through that same 
  kind of disception and have no heart for those who pretend to be what they are 
  not.   I also do not watch movies about divorce, comedy or 
  otherwise.  Personal preference.  God has not stopped listen to 
  Amy  but I have.  I had just bought an album by Pretty Boy, 
  too.  It has never been opened.  
John


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








I think you are alluding to “moral-ism” as a religion
or substitute for Godly righteousness. 
Making moral choices is not moral-ism, but morality, or doing right, or
righteousness, or morals-in-action, or godliness, or……...So do you
think morality is of the devil? Izzy

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:05
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Iz:Tell me the difference, as you see it, then I'll give you
an answer.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
13:56





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:34
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a "moral" president? An
acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to a "moral" neighbor
and to an "immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said he) I'd always
choose the former." So
what’s the point?  Moral(ism)
is, in my opinion, of the Devil. Do
you also believe morality is of the devil? Izzy







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:41





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



How about a “moral” President? Izzy

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Izzy:No! This is not an example of a 'godly' president.It is
however, a moral choice with which I heartily concur.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:13





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

Example of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay
Pride Month, thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   Izzy














Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 6/15/2004 9:48:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Just for the record.  I was at a concert to support Compassion International and Amy Grant was one of the singers - (I mainly went to hear Mercy Me)  She gave quite a testimony and spoke about her sin and restoration.  Laura 

Doesn't move me.   The plan for most in her situation is to go ahead and commit the deed, then repent after she /he has destroyed whatever is in her/his way, collected and possessed the benefit, and in general made a mockery of the Lordship of Christ. 

John


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Iz:Tell me the difference, as you see it, then I'll 
give you an answer.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 13:56
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:34 
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
   
  
  OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a "moral" 
  president? An acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to a "moral" 
  neighbor and to an "immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said he) I'd always 
  choose the former." So what’s the 
  point?  Moral(ism) 
  is, in my opinion, of the Devil. Do you also believe morality is of the devil? 
  Izzy
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

    
Sent: June 
    15, 2004 11:41

Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] President George Bush

 
How 
about a “moral” President? Izzy
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21 
    AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President 
George Bush
 

Izzy:No! This is not an example 
of a 'godly' president.It is however, a moral choice with which I heartily 
concur.

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  Sent: June 
  15, 2004 11:13
  
  Subject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] President George Bush
  
   
   
  Example 
  of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay Pride Month, 
  thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   
  Izzy


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Izzy:Ouch!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 14:00
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
  A 
  frequent story by those who intended to do wrong, did it, and intended to be 
  “forgiven and restored” all along.  
  That does not change the fact that they are living in an adulterous 
  relationship to this day (if they did not divorce on Biblical grounds).  Izzy
   
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:47 
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
   
  Just for the record.  I was 
  at a concert to support Compassion International and Amy Grant was one of the 
  singers - (I mainly went to hear Mercy Me)  She gave quite a testimony 
  and spoke about her sin and restoration.  
  Laura


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








A frequent story by those who intended to do wrong, did it, and
intended to be “forgiven and restored” all along.  That does not change the fact that they
are living in an adulterous relationship to this day (if they did not divorce
on Biblical grounds).  Izzy

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:47
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 

Just for the record.  I was at a concert to support
Compassion International and Amy Grant was one of the singers - (I mainly went
to hear Mercy Me)  She gave quite a testimony and spoke about her sin and
restoration.  Laura








RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








I’d say that’s a miracle. J Izzy

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:42
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Izzy:He's the one I'd vote for given who's available. How's
that?







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:17





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



And who do YOU say he is? 
Are we back to “stupid” and “incompetent”, or do
you have anything specific, as
opposed to general slurs upon his character? Izzy

 













From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir


    but it did show GB
for who he is) 







 














RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








 

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:34
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a "moral" president? An
acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to a "moral"
neighbor and to an "immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said he)
I'd always choose the former." So
what’s the point?  Moral(ism)
is, in my opinion, of the Devil. Do
you also believe morality is of the devil? Izzy







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:41





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



How about a “moral” President? Izzy

 









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Izzy:No! This is not an example of a 'godly' president.It is
however, a moral choice with which I heartily concur.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:13





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

Example of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay
Pride Month, thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   Izzy












Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 6/15/2004 7:02:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

John:Disagree vehemently! God didn't stop listening to them and, neither have I. 


Vehemently?!  Wow.  It is not a salvation issue with me.   But it is a leadership issue.   Leaders in the church are to be above the fray.   And I know that gospel singer is not a leader in the same sense as a prophet, teacher, preacher or elder.   But with Amy, I just can't buy her albums.   I know something about the situation between her and Pretty Boy.  I saw the hurt in Chapman's  face (Gary Chapman is or was her husband, right?).  I have been through that same kind of disception and have no heart for those who pretend to be what they are not.   I also do not watch movies about divorce, comedy or otherwise.  Personal preference.  God has not stopped listen to Amy  but I have.  

I had just bought an album by Pretty Boy, too.  It has never been opened.  


John




Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Terry:I thought you skipped my posts? All (as in 
everyone of you) who thinks as do you on this DO NOT SPEAK FOR GOD! (God says 
'Amen Lance)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Terry Clifton 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 12:39
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  Lance Muir wrote:
  



Judyt:No chuckle here. Good on ya mate. God 
does have sons and daughters who are Democrat & Greens (even some who 
make documentaries-note: it was a poorly made documentary but it did show GB 
for who he is) 
  
  
Christian 
  Democrat has the same ring as giant shrimp or military intelligence.  
  Can you say Oxymoron? 
  
That 
  in no way implies that all, or even most Republicans are 
ChristiansTerry


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread LaurHamm

Just for the record.  I was at a concert to support Compassion International and Amy Grant was one of the singers - (I mainly went to hear Mercy Me)  She gave quite a testimony and spoke about her sin and restoration.  Laura


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Izzy:He's the one I'd vote for given who's 
available. How's that?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 11:17
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
  And 
  who do YOU say he is?  Are we back 
  to “stupid” and “incompetent”, or do you have anything specific, 
  as opposed to general slurs upon his character? 
  Izzy
   
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance 
  Muir
      but it did 
  show GB for who he is) 
  

 


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Terry Clifton




Lance Muir wrote:

  
  
  
  Judyt:No chuckle here. Good on ya
mate. God does have sons and daughters who are Democrat & Greens
(even some who make documentaries-note: it was a poorly made
documentary but it did show GB for who he is) 
  



   Christian Democrat has the same ring as giant shrimp or
military intelligence.  Can you say Oxymoron? 
  



   That in no way implies that all, or even most Republicans
are Christians
  

Terry





Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



OK, I'll bite. How 'bout a "moral" president? An 
acquaintance of mine said: "I've lived next door to a "moral" neighbor and to an 
"immoral" neighbor. If I had a choice (said he) I'd always choose the former." 
Moral(ism) is, in my opinion, of the Devil.   

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 11:41
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
  How 
  about a “moral” President? Izzy
   
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21 
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
   
  
  Izzy:No! This is not an example of 
  a 'godly' president.It is however, a moral choice with which I heartily 
  concur.
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    

    Sent: June 
15, 2004 11:13

Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] President George Bush

 
 
Example 
of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay Pride Month, 
thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   
Izzy


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








How about a “moral” President? Izzy

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:21
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush



 



Izzy:No! This is not an example of a 'godly' president.It is
however, a moral choice with which I heartily concur.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sent: June 15, 2004
11:13





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
President George Bush





 



 

Example of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay Pride
Month, thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957   Izzy










RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








And who do YOU say he is? 
Are we back to “stupid” and “incompetent”, or do
you have anything specific, as
opposed to general slurs upon his character? Izzy

 













From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir


    but it did show
GB for who he is) 







 












RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








 

Example of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay
Pride Month, thereby blocking federal funds for use of such.  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957
  Izzy








Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Izzy:No! This is not an example of a 'godly' 
president.It is however, a moral choice with which I heartily 
concur.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 11:13
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
   
  Example 
  of godly President: Bush refuses to proclaim June as Gay Pride Month, thereby 
  blocking federal funds for use of such.  
  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38957 
    Izzy


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Judyt:No chuckle here. Good on ya mate. God does 
have sons and daughters who are Democrat & Greens (even some who make 
documentaries-note: it was a poorly made documentary but it did show GB for who 
he is) 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 10:20
  Subject: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  In a message dated 6/15/2004 6:30:57 AM Pacific Daylight 
  Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:PS:Sad about the 'Rushmeister' isn't it?I am one of his 
  biggest fans but you are right  -- it is discouraging to me.  I no 
  longer listen to Amy Grant for the same reason.  
  John
   
  To me it is one more validation of 
  the truth of God's Word.  Rush Limbaugh carried the conservative 
  banner but he did
  mock, make fun of, and deride those 
  on the other side.  When it because public that he was addicted to 
  Oxycontin
  what he had sown seemed to come 
  back on him.  I also wondered about his wife since drug addiction and 
  secrecy/
  deception go hand in hand it would 
  have spilled over into the rest of his life.  Sad, but my prayer is that 
  he will learn, a
  public fall has to be very 
  painful.
   


[TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Judy Taylor



I don't believe you Lance, you always have a lot to 
say about everything, I
seldom meet anyone with so many opinions about so 
much; and the answer to
your question is - No I don't chuckle, I am as serious as can be about the 
Truth
of God and His Word which 
is what I am discussing these issues 
in the light of.  
Sad that all you can get from what DavidM 
and I write is what you consider 
to
be "pontificating" but then I don't take it 
personally - 
 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judyt: You just 'read' me so comprehensively that 
I'm without retort. Do you every go back, read 
your own posts then, chuckle??   You and DavidM have an heir of 'pontification' 'bout 
you. It can be 
difficult to take you seriously. 

  From: Judy Taylor 
  From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Judyt:Next time you're choosing a doctor, 
  dentist, carpenter...employ the same standard. 
   
  The above are temporal professions 
  Lance even lthough Jesus was a carpenter in his youth.
  A President is also in a temporal and temporary position but one 
  important enough that the man
  who leads by example as a public 
  servant should be a man of honor and moral stature.
   
  God does not, in my opinion, override 
  incompetence. 
   
  God has a different standard from 
  yours Lance because He knows the end from the beginning 
  and while man looks at the outward appearance [..]
   
  God chose the imperfect Abraham 
  (even though as someone pointed out he had inherited
  a lying spirit which came 
  up when he was in a 
  tight spot and which can be traced for four more
  generations after him); but 
  God said "I know him that he will command his children and his
  household after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice 
  and judgment that
  the Lord may bring upon 
  Abraham that which he hath spoken of him" (Genesis 18:19) 
   
  Hmmm at least not in the case of some on TT. In 
  my opinion you do on occasion employ 
  Scripture well. Sometimes you just downright 
  mangle 'em.
   
  Incompetence and mangling in your 
  eyesight Lance may be completely different in the eyesight
  of God.who is not a follower of Calvin/TFT, who is not a 
  respecter of any man's person, and who 
  most definitely does not have a 
  liberal mindset.
   
  
From: Judy Taylor 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'd 
take an immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.
 
Say no more Lance - A man's morality determines his 
theology  You have
given the answer to something I was 
pondering.
 
Pick a profession, any profession at all (I've removed the jokers). Got 
it?Don't let me see it. Now let me tell you that whatever it is simply 
being a'believer' doesn't intrinsically make you better at it. Anyone 
disagree?
 
Yes!
To be a Head of State takes honor, moral character, 
and a certain stability that 
is rooted in moral 
decency.  The true John Kennedy was not revealed until
after his death and today it appears that he spent 
much of his time in office
trying to hide his real 
priority.  Promiscuity is a Kennedy family curse and Camelot 
was fantasy.  Bill Clinton lived like his 
hero Kennedy during his 8yrs in office 
and
because of this parents were forced to explain oral sex to grade school children 
and BC was publicly exposed as a liar and 
perjurer.  What a shocking example 
for 
young Americans many of whom dream of being 
President "when they grow up."
I'll take George W. and Laura any day, they 
represent decency.
 
 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Lance 
wrote:> > The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor 
choice).>> Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is 
as close to saying that> you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we 
might hope for.>> Lance wrote:> > I do think that 
one can take the 'measure' of> > a person through their public 
performance.>> I agree, but we should not confuse hours of 
television interviews with> public performance, right?  Some 
look good in front of the camera but> perform poorly off the 
camera.  Some write well while others are more> articulate 
orally.  Some cannot write or speak, but perform well in> 
administrative responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a 
person> can be measured, and television interviews is only one 
measurement.>> What did Bush say or do in his television 
interviews that gave you a> poor assessment of his intellectual 
abilities?>> Lance wrote:> > The 'Iraq choice' was, 
in my judgement, a blunder> > of the first order.>> 
Why do you think so?  I cannot find one problem with the 
decision.  I> have always supported this move and still 
do.  I believe it was a very> significant move toward world 
peace, although true peace will not be> achieved until everyone in 

[TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Judy Taylor



Gracious Lance, your God is open to 
everything.  Must not be the one who wrote scripture
because He doesn't violate His own Word.  
It appears that Amy Grant was writing love
notes to another woman's husband... Rush was 
just full of himself but then he never
claimed to be a born again Christian, nor does 
he act like one who walks in the fear of
God.
 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John:Disagree vehemently! God didn't stop listening 
to them and, neither have I. 

  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 09:55
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  In a message dated 6/15/2004 6:30:57 AM Pacific 
  Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  PS:Sad about the 'Rushmeister' isn't it?I 
  am one of his biggest fans but you are right  -- it is discouraging to 
  me.  I no longer listen to Amy Grant for the same reason.  
  John 


Re: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Judyt: You just 'read' me so comprehensively that 
I'm without retort. Do you every go back, read your own posts then, chuckle?? 

  You and DavidM have an heir of 
'pontification' 'bout you. It can be difficult to take you 
seriously. 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 10:11
  Subject: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] President 
  George Bush
  
   
  From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Judyt:Next time you're choosing a doctor, 
  dentist, carpenter...employ the same standard. 
   
  The above are temporal professions 
  Lance even lthough Jesus was a carpenter in his youth.
  A President is also in a temporal and temporary position but one 
  important enough that the man
  who leads by example as a public 
  servant should be a man of honor and moral stature.
   
  God does not, in my opinion, override 
  incompetence. 
   
  God has a different standard from 
  yours Lance because He knows the end from the beginning 
  and while man looks at the outward appearance [..]
   
  God chose the imperfect Abraham 
  (even though as someone pointed out he had inherited
  a lying spirit which came 
  up when he was in a 
  tight spot and which can be traced for four more
  generations after him); but 
  God said "I know him that he will command his children and his
  household after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice 
  and judgment that
  the Lord may bring upon 
  Abraham that which he hath spoken of him" (Genesis 18:19) 
   
  Hmmm at least not in the case of some on TT. In 
  my opinion you do on occasion employ 
  Scripture well. Sometimes you just downright 
  mangle 'em.
   
  Incompetence and mangling in your 
  eyesight Lance may be completely different in the eyesight
  of God.who is not a follower of Calvin/TFT, who is not a 
  respecter of any man's person, and who 
  most definitely does not have a 
  liberal mindset.
   
  
From: Judy Taylor 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'd 
take an immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.
 
Say no more Lance - A man's morality determines his 
theology  You have
given the answer to something I was 
pondering.
 
Pick a profession, any profession at all (I've removed the jokers). Got 
it?Don't let me see it. Now let me tell you that whatever it is simply 
being a'believer' doesn't intrinsically make you better at it. Anyone 
disagree?
 
Yes!
To be a Head of State takes honor, moral character, 
and a certain stability that 
is rooted in moral 
decency.  The true John Kennedy was not revealed until
after his death and today it appears that he spent 
much of his time in office
trying to hide his real 
priority.  Promiscuity is a Kennedy family curse and Camelot 
was fantasy.  Bill Clinton lived like his 
hero Kennedy during his 8yrs in office 
and
because of this parents were forced to explain oral sex to grade school children 
and BC was publicly exposed as a liar and 
perjurer.  What a shocking example 
for 
young Americans many of whom dream of being 
President "when they grow up."
I'll take George W. and Laura any day, they 
represent decency.
 
 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Lance 
wrote:> > The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor 
choice).>> Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is 
as close to saying that> you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we 
might hope for.>> Lance wrote:> > I do think that 
one can take the 'measure' of> > a person through their public 
performance.>> I agree, but we should not confuse hours of 
television interviews with> public performance, right?  Some 
look good in front of the camera but> perform poorly off the 
camera.  Some write well while others are more> articulate 
orally.  Some cannot write or speak, but perform well in> 
administrative responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a 
person> can be measured, and television interviews is only one 
measurement.>> What did Bush say or do in his television 
interviews that gave you a> poor assessment of his intellectual 
abilities?>> Lance wrote:> > The 'Iraq choice' was, 
in my judgement, a blunder> > of the first order.>> 
Why do you think so?  I cannot find one problem with the 
decision.  I> have always supported this move and still 
do.  I believe it was a very> significant move toward world 
peace, although true peace will not be> achieved until everyone in 
the world believes in Jesus Christ.>> Peace be 

[TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Judy Taylor



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 6/15/2004 6:30:57 AM Pacific 
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:PS:Sad about the 'Rushmeister' 
isn't it?I am one of his biggest fans but you are right  -- it is 
discouraging to me.  I no longer listen to Amy Grant for the same 
reason.  John
 
To me it is one more validation of 
the truth of God's Word.  Rush Limbaugh carried the conservative 
banner but he did
mock, make fun of, and deride those 
on the other side.  When it because public that he was addicted to 
Oxycontin
what he had sown seemed to come back 
on him.  I also wondered about his wife since drug addiction and 
secrecy/
deception go hand in hand it would 
have spilled over into the rest of his life.  Sad, but my prayer is that he 
will learn, a
public fall has to be very 
painful.
 


Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Judy Taylor



 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judyt:Next time you're choosing a doctor, dentist, 
carpenter...employ the same standard. 
 
The above are temporal professions 
Lance even lthough Jesus was a carpenter in his youth.
A President is also in a temporal and temporary position but one 
important enough that the man
who leads by example as a public 
servant should be a man of honor and moral stature.
 
God does not, in my opinion, override incompetence. 

 
God has a different standard from 
yours Lance because He knows the end from the beginning 
and while man looks at the outward appearance [..]
 
God chose the imperfect Abraham (even 
though as someone pointed out he had inherited
a lying spirit which came 
up when he was in a 
tight spot and which can be traced for four more
generations after him); but 
God said "I know him that he 
will command his children and his
household after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and 
judgment that
the Lord may bring upon Abraham 
that which he hath spoken of him" (Genesis 18:19) 
 
Hmmm at least not in the case of some on TT. In my 
opinion you do on occasion employ 
Scripture well. Sometimes you just downright mangle 
'em.
 
Incompetence and mangling in your 
eyesight Lance may be completely different in the eyesight
of God.who is not a follower of Calvin/TFT, who is not a respecter 
of any man's person, and who 
most definitely does not have a 
liberal mindset.
 

  From: Judy Taylor 
  From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'd take 
  an immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.
   
  Say no more Lance - A man's morality determines his 
  theology  You have
  given the answer to something I was 
  pondering.
   
  Pick a profession, any profession at all (I've removed the jokers). Got 
  it?Don't let me see it. Now let me tell you that whatever it is simply 
  being a'believer' doesn't intrinsically make you better at it. Anyone 
  disagree?
   
  Yes!
  To be a Head of State takes honor, moral character, 
  and a certain stability that 
  is rooted in moral 
  decency.  The true John Kennedy was not revealed until
  after his death and today it appears that he spent 
  much of his time in office
  trying to hide his real 
  priority.  Promiscuity is a Kennedy family curse and Camelot 
  was fantasy.  Bill Clinton lived like his 
  hero Kennedy during his 8yrs in office 
  and
  because of this parents were forced to explain oral sex to grade school children 
  and BC was publicly exposed as a liar and 
  perjurer.  What a shocking example 
  for 
  young Americans many of whom dream of being 
  President "when they grow up."
  I'll take George W. and Laura any day, they represent 
  decency.
   
   
  From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Lance 
  wrote:> > The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor 
  choice).>> Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is 
  as close to saying that> you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we might 
  hope for.>> Lance wrote:> > I do think that one can 
  take the 'measure' of> > a person through their public 
  performance.>> I agree, but we should not confuse hours of 
  television interviews with> public performance, right?  Some look 
  good in front of the camera but> perform poorly off the camera.  
  Some write well while others are more> articulate orally.  Some 
  cannot write or speak, but perform well in> administrative 
  responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a person> can be 
  measured, and television interviews is only one measurement.>> 
  What did Bush say or do in his television interviews that gave you a> 
  poor assessment of his intellectual abilities?>> Lance 
  wrote:> > The 'Iraq choice' was, in my judgement, a blunder> 
  > of the first order.>> Why do you think so?  I cannot 
  find one problem with the decision.  I> have always supported this 
  move and still do.  I believe it was a very> significant move 
  toward world peace, although true peace will not be> achieved until 
  everyone in the world believes in Jesus Christ.>> Peace be with 
  you.> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.>> 
  --> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, 
  that you mayknow how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 
  4:6)http://www.InnGlory.org>> If 
  you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  you will be unsubscribed.  If you have afriend who wants to join, 
  tell him to send an e-mail to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
  will be subscribed.
   
   
  --"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, 
  that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) 
  http://www.InnGlory.org
   
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell 
  him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
  will be subscribed.
   
  


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



John:Disagree vehemently! God didn't stop listening 
to them and, neither have I. 

  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 09:55
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  In a message dated 6/15/2004 6:30:57 AM Pacific 
  Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  PS:Sad about the 'Rushmeister' isn't it?I 
  am one of his biggest fans but you are right  -- it is discouraging to 
  me.  I no longer listen to Amy Grant for the same reason.  
  John 


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 6/15/2004 6:30:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

PS:Sad about the 'Rushmeister' isn't it?


I am one of his biggest fans but you are right  -- it is discouraging to me.  I no longer listen to Amy Grant for the same reason.  

John


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily








 

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

 

Izzy:Given the fair characterization proferred, Heathen of course. No
doubt

'bout it.  Lance,
which issues do you take issue with?

  Yikes!! and, I 'wondered'
concerning the proliferation of militia groups

in America
the beautiful?? Wonder no more.

  PS:Sad
about the 'Rushmeister' isn't it? Certainly
is.  I was wondering what effect all the
media attacks were having on his marriage. 
I think he is a generally moral man, but I am not certain whether he is
a true Believer.  However, one cannot
stop a spouse that is determined to desert the marriage.  We should pray for him. Izzy

- Original Message - 

From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent: June 15, 2004 09:17

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

 

 

> Lance, Once again here goes:

> 

> Believer = Pro-Life, Anti-Sodomy, Anti-confiscatory taxes on
families,

etc.

> Heathen = Pro-Abortion, Pro-Sodomy, Pro-Socialism, etc.

> So which way should one vote?

> 

> Why do you object to the idea that we are ALL subject to God's
judgment

for

> sins we commit? Why don't you think God will judge us for
slandering godly

> men?

> 

> Izzy

> 

> -Original Message-

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir

> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 4:08 AM

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

> 

> Izzy:Answer: No. By the by; to all and sundry: Believer=Republican?

> Unbeliever=Democrat? I think not.

> 

>  All you folks had best
think about this 'judgement' you  so
frequently

> dispense, on God's behalf, coming back on your own heads. The
vindictive

> comments concerning media and party leaders, other than your own
are

> unbecoming. GB is no more God's chosen vessel, dispensing America's brand

of

> righteousness on the world, than was BC.

> 

> 

> 

> - Original Message - 

> From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Sent: June 14, 2004 18:41

> Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

> 

> 

> > Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased Liberal

> media,

> > you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do you

> think

> > that God will judge us for making erroneous/libelous
judgments against

> those

> > that He considers righteous? Izzy

> >

> > -Original Message-

> >

> > >

> > > Lance wrote:

> > > > My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same,

> > > > is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews

> > > > & talks which have been televised over the last

> > > > several years.

> > >

> > > Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based
upon hours of

> > > interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert
Einstein would

come

> > > across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.

> > >

> > > I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush
speaking, but his

> > > intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes
and his strong

> > > leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be

> > > VERY intelligent.

> > >

> > > Peace be with you.

> > > David Miller,
Beverly Hills, Florida.

> > >

> >

> >

> > --

> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with
salt, that you may

> know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)

> http://www.InnGlory.org

> >

> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an
email to

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a

> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

> 

> 

> --

> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt,
that you may

know

> how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)

> http://www.InnGlory.org

> 

> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
to

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a

> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

> 

> 

> --

> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt,
that you m

RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily
That's the whole problem with Liberals.  They prefer immorality.  Of course,
that's all they have to choose from. Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir


I'd take an immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.



--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir
Izzy:Given the fair characterization proferred, Heathen of course. No doubt
'bout it.
  Yikes!! and, I 'wondered' concerning the proliferation of militia groups
in America the beautiful?? Wonder no more.
  PS:Sad about the 'Rushmeister' isn't it?
- Original Message - 
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 15, 2004 09:17
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush


> Lance, Once again here goes:
>
> Believer = Pro-Life, Anti-Sodomy, Anti-confiscatory taxes on families,
etc.
> Heathen = Pro-Abortion, Pro-Sodomy, Pro-Socialism, etc.
> So which way should one vote?
>
> Why do you object to the idea that we are ALL subject to God's judgment
for
> sins we commit? Why don't you think God will judge us for slandering godly
> men?
>
> Izzy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 4:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush
>
> Izzy:Answer: No. By the by; to all and sundry: Believer=Republican?
> Unbeliever=Democrat? I think not.
>
>  All you folks had best think about this 'judgement' you  so frequently
> dispense, on God's behalf, coming back on your own heads. The vindictive
> comments concerning media and party leaders, other than your own are
> unbecoming. GB is no more God's chosen vessel, dispensing America's brand
of
> righteousness on the world, than was BC.
>
>
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: June 14, 2004 18:41
> Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush
>
>
> > Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased Liberal
> media,
> > you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do you
> think
> > that God will judge us for making erroneous/libelous judgments against
> those
> > that He considers righteous? Izzy
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > >
> > > Lance wrote:
> > > > My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same,
> > > > is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews
> > > > & talks which have been televised over the last
> > > > several years.
> > >
> > > Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based upon hours of
> > > interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert Einstein would
come
> > > across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.
> > >
> > > I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush speaking, but his
> > > intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes and his strong
> > > leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be
> > > VERY intelligent.
> > >
> > > Peace be with you.
> > > David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know
> how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily
Lance, If you choose to watch documentaries that ridicule our President then
you are choosing to have a biased view of the truth. You choose what you
want to believe about a person, for good or for evil.  The only time I
choose to believe evil about anyone is in the light of obvious sinful acts.
Otherwise one is not walking in I Cor. 13.  Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

DavidM:There's a documentary out (DVD) entitled 'My Journey With George'
Rent it. Say n'more, know what I mean, nod's as good as a wink' (Monty
Python)

I'd take an immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.

Pick a profession, any profession at all (I've removed the jokers). Got it?
Don't let me see it. Now let me tell you that whatever it is simply being a
'believer' doesn't intrinsically make you better at it. Anyone
disagree? - Original Message - 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 15, 2004 06:05
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush


> Lance wrote:
> > The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor choice).
>
> Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is as close to saying that
> you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we might hope for.
>
> Lance wrote:
> > I do think that one can take the 'measure' of
> > a person through their public performance.
>
> I agree, but we should not confuse hours of television interviews with
> public performance, right?  Some look good in front of the camera but
> perform poorly off the camera.  Some write well while others are more
> articulate orally.  Some cannot write or speak, but perform well in
> administrative responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a person
> can be measured, and television interviews is only one measurement.
>
> What did Bush say or do in his television interviews that gave you a
> poor assessment of his intellectual abilities?
>
> Lance wrote:
> > The 'Iraq choice' was, in my judgement, a blunder
> > of the first order.
>
> Why do you think so?  I cannot find one problem with the decision.  I
> have always supported this move and still do.  I believe it was a very
> significant move toward world peace, although true peace will not be
> achieved until everyone in the world believes in Jesus Christ.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread ShieldsFamily
Lance, Once again here goes:

Believer = Pro-Life, Anti-Sodomy, Anti-confiscatory taxes on families, etc.
Heathen = Pro-Abortion, Pro-Sodomy, Pro-Socialism, etc.
So which way should one vote?

Why do you object to the idea that we are ALL subject to God's judgment for
sins we commit? Why don't you think God will judge us for slandering godly
men?

Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 4:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

Izzy:Answer: No. By the by; to all and sundry: Believer=Republican?
Unbeliever=Democrat? I think not.

 All you folks had best think about this 'judgement' you  so frequently
dispense, on God's behalf, coming back on your own heads. The vindictive
comments concerning media and party leaders, other than your own are
unbecoming. GB is no more God's chosen vessel, dispensing America's brand of
righteousness on the world, than was BC.



- Original Message - 
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 14, 2004 18:41
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush


> Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased Liberal
media,
> you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do you
think
> that God will judge us for making erroneous/libelous judgments against
those
> that He considers righteous? Izzy
>
> -Original Message-
>
> >
> > Lance wrote:
> > > My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same,
> > > is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews
> > > & talks which have been televised over the last
> > > several years.
> >
> > Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based upon hours of
> > interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert Einstein would come
> > across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.
> >
> > I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush speaking, but his
> > intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes and his strong
> > leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be
> > VERY intelligent.
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
> >
>
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir



Judyt:Next time you're choosing a doctor, dentist, 
carpenter...employ the same standard. God does not, in my opinion, override 
incompetence. Hmmm at least not in the case of some on TT. In my opinion you do 
on occasion employ Scripture well. Sometimes you just downright mangle 
'em.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: June 15, 2004 08:18
  Subject: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'd take 
  an immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.
   
  Say no more Lance - A man's morality determines his 
  theology  You have
  given the answer to something I was 
  pondering.
   
  Pick a profession, any profession at all (I've removed the jokers). Got 
  it?Don't let me see it. Now let me tell you that whatever it is simply 
  being a'believer' doesn't intrinsically make you better at it. Anyone 
  disagree?
   
  Yes!
  To be a Head of State takes honor, moral character, 
  and a certain stability that 
  is rooted in moral 
  decency.  The true John Kennedy was not revealed until
  after his death and today it appears that he spent 
  much of his time in office
  trying to hide his real 
  priority.  Promiscuity is a Kennedy family curse and Camelot 
  was fantasy.  Bill Clinton lived like his 
  hero Kennedy during his 8yrs in office 
  and
  because of this parents were forced to explain oral sex to grade school children 
  and BC was publicly exposed as a liar and 
  perjurer.  What a shocking example 
  for 
  young Americans many of whom dream of being 
  President "when they grow up."
  I'll take George W. and Laura any day, they represent 
  decency.
   
   
  From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Lance 
  wrote:> > The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor 
  choice).>> Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is 
  as close to saying that> you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we might 
  hope for.>> Lance wrote:> > I do think that one can 
  take the 'measure' of> > a person through their public 
  performance.>> I agree, but we should not confuse hours of 
  television interviews with> public performance, right?  Some look 
  good in front of the camera but> perform poorly off the camera.  
  Some write well while others are more> articulate orally.  Some 
  cannot write or speak, but perform well in> administrative 
  responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a person> can be 
  measured, and television interviews is only one measurement.>> 
  What did Bush say or do in his television interviews that gave you a> 
  poor assessment of his intellectual abilities?>> Lance 
  wrote:> > The 'Iraq choice' was, in my judgement, a blunder> 
  > of the first order.>> Why do you think so?  I cannot 
  find one problem with the decision.  I> have always supported this 
  move and still do.  I believe it was a very> significant move 
  toward world peace, although true peace will not be> achieved until 
  everyone in the world believes in Jesus Christ.>> Peace be with 
  you.> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.>> 
  --> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, 
  that you mayknow how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 
  4:6)http://www.InnGlory.org>> If 
  you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  you will be unsubscribed.  If you have afriend who wants to join, 
  tell him to send an e-mail to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
  will be subscribed.
   
   
  --"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, 
  that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) 
  http://www.InnGlory.org
   
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell 
  him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
  will be subscribed.
   
  


[TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Judy Taylor



From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'd take an 
immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.
 
Say no more Lance - A man's morality determines his 
theology  You have
given the answer to something I was 
pondering.
 
Pick a profession, any profession at all (I've removed the jokers). Got 
it?Don't let me see it. Now let me tell you that whatever it is simply being 
a'believer' doesn't intrinsically make you better at it. Anyone 
disagree?
 
Yes!
To be a Head of State takes honor, moral character, and 
a certain stability that 
is rooted in moral 
decency.  The true John Kennedy was not revealed until
after his death and today it appears that he spent much 
of his time in office
trying to hide his real 
priority.  Promiscuity is a Kennedy family curse and Camelot 
was fantasy.  Bill Clinton lived like his 
hero Kennedy during his 8yrs in office 
and
because of this parents 
were forced to explain oral sex to grade school 
children 
and BC was publicly exposed as a liar and 
perjurer.  What a shocking example for 
young Americans many of whom dream of being 
President "when they grow up."
I'll take George W. and Laura any day, they represent 
decency.
 
 
 From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Lance 
wrote:> > The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor 
choice).>> Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is as 
close to saying that> you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we might hope 
for.>> Lance wrote:> > I do think that one can take the 
'measure' of> > a person through their public 
performance.>> I agree, but we should not confuse hours of 
television interviews with> public performance, right?  Some look 
good in front of the camera but> perform poorly off the camera.  
Some write well while others are more> articulate orally.  Some 
cannot write or speak, but perform well in> administrative 
responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a person> can be 
measured, and television interviews is only one measurement.>> 
What did Bush say or do in his television interviews that gave you a> 
poor assessment of his intellectual abilities?>> Lance 
wrote:> > The 'Iraq choice' was, in my judgement, a blunder> 
> of the first order.>> Why do you think so?  I cannot 
find one problem with the decision.  I> have always supported this 
move and still do.  I believe it was a very> significant move toward 
world peace, although true peace will not be> achieved until everyone in 
the world believes in Jesus Christ.>> Peace be with you.> 
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.>> --> "Let 
your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you mayknow how 
you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)http://www.InnGlory.org>> If 
you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
you will be unsubscribed.  If you have afriend who wants to join, tell 
him to send an e-mail to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
will be subscribed.
 
 
--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, 
that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
 
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him 
to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
will be subscribed.
 



Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir
DavidM:There's a documentary out (DVD) entitled 'My Journey With George'
Rent it. Say n'more, know what I mean, nod's as good as a wink' (Monty
Python)

I'd take an immoral John Kennedy over a moral George Bush any day.

Pick a profession, any profession at all (I've removed the jokers). Got it?
Don't let me see it. Now let me tell you that whatever it is simply being a
'believer' doesn't intrinsically make you better at it. Anyone
disagree? - Original Message - 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 15, 2004 06:05
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush


> Lance wrote:
> > The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor choice).
>
> Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is as close to saying that
> you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we might hope for.
>
> Lance wrote:
> > I do think that one can take the 'measure' of
> > a person through their public performance.
>
> I agree, but we should not confuse hours of television interviews with
> public performance, right?  Some look good in front of the camera but
> perform poorly off the camera.  Some write well while others are more
> articulate orally.  Some cannot write or speak, but perform well in
> administrative responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a person
> can be measured, and television interviews is only one measurement.
>
> What did Bush say or do in his television interviews that gave you a
> poor assessment of his intellectual abilities?
>
> Lance wrote:
> > The 'Iraq choice' was, in my judgement, a blunder
> > of the first order.
>
> Why do you think so?  I cannot find one problem with the decision.  I
> have always supported this move and still do.  I believe it was a very
> significant move toward world peace, although true peace will not be
> achieved until everyone in the world believes in Jesus Christ.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread Lance Muir
Izzy:Answer: No. By the by; to all and sundry: Believer=Republican?
Unbeliever=Democrat? I think not.

 All you folks had best think about this 'judgement' you  so frequently
dispense, on God's behalf, coming back on your own heads. The vindictive
comments concerning media and party leaders, other than your own are
unbecoming. GB is no more God's chosen vessel, dispensing America's brand of
righteousness on the world, than was BC.



- Original Message - 
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 14, 2004 18:41
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush


> Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased Liberal
media,
> you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do you
think
> that God will judge us for making erroneous/libelous judgments against
those
> that He considers righteous? Izzy
>
> -Original Message-
>
> >
> > Lance wrote:
> > > My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same,
> > > is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews
> > > & talks which have been televised over the last
> > > several years.
> >
> > Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based upon hours of
> > interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert Einstein would come
> > across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.
> >
> > I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush speaking, but his
> > intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes and his strong
> > leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be
> > VERY intelligent.
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
> >
>
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-15 Thread David Miller
Lance wrote:
> The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor choice).

Thank you for that admission.  I guess this is as close to saying that
you were wrong to call Bush stupid as we might hope for.

Lance wrote:
> I do think that one can take the 'measure' of 
> a person through their public performance.

I agree, but we should not confuse hours of television interviews with
public performance, right?  Some look good in front of the camera but
perform poorly off the camera.  Some write well while others are more
articulate orally.  Some cannot write or speak, but perform well in
administrative responsibilities.  There are many ways in which a person
can be measured, and television interviews is only one measurement.

What did Bush say or do in his television interviews that gave you a
poor assessment of his intellectual abilities?

Lance wrote:
> The 'Iraq choice' was, in my judgement, a blunder 
> of the first order.

Why do you think so?  I cannot find one problem with the decision.  I
have always supported this move and still do.  I believe it was a very
significant move toward world peace, although true peace will not be
achieved until everyone in the world believes in Jesus Christ.

Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-14 Thread Wm. Taylor



 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:00 PM
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
  
  
  Bill,
   
   Not being 
  one of you "big thinkers" I doubt I can answer these questions to your 
  satisfaction. 
   
  Ah Izzy, no big 
  thoughts here. I was just wondering how you thought we could determine such 
  things. I think your answers are satifactory -- quite so, in 
  fact.
   
  Only God knows who He considers 
  "righteous", as He can see the heart as well as all of a person's 
  actions/intents that we cannot.  
  
   
  However the Bible tells us that (Gen 15:6) Abraham "believed in 
  the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness." 
  
   
  Deuteronomy 6:25  "And it shall be our 
  righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the LORD our 
  God, as he hath commanded us."
   
  So it seems to me that if one Believes 
  and, as a result, Obeys the 
  Lord, they are counted as righteous by Him.  One problem in stating that someone is 
  "stupid" in their actions is that you cannot know what the Lord has told him 
  to do (unless it is obviously sin according to God's laws).  However, one indicator of whether 
  someone is a righteous man is the comportment of his life.  For example, is he truthful, loyal, 
  trustworthy, faithful, and does he give honor to his Lord? If he displays 
  integrity over a long period of time, with no obvious sin, one can assume that 
  he is living righteously. 
   
  How will God judge us if we are not righteous? Your question, as I understood it, was a bit more specific 
  than this. You asked, ". . . do you think that God will judge 
  us for making erroneous/libelous judgments against those that He considers 
  righteous?" I was just wondering what you were thinking this judgment from 
  God -- if it were to be made -- might involve. I was turning the question 
  back on you, in other words, hoping to draw out of you what you were 
  thinking.
   
  I would assume in both this life and the 
  next.  In this life by the natural 
  consequences of a sinful life, which are often not seen by the outside world.  In the next by either lack of rewards or even by hell 
  itself.  That's about as 
  much as I have figured it out so far.  
  I'd appreciate any further help on the subject 
  myself.
   
  Izzy 
   
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Wm. TaylorSent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:59 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] President George Bush
   
  I'm curious, Izzy, Who is it whom God considers 
  "righteous" and how is it
  that we can tell?
   
  Another question, When you ask if "God will judge us," 
  what kind of judgment
  do you have in mind; are you thinking in terms of 
  something specific --
  e.g., like maybe he will send us to 
  hell?
   
  Thanks,
      
  Bill
   
  - Original Message 
  -
  From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:41 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George 
  Bush
   
   
  > Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased 
  Liberal
  media,
  > you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do 
  you
  think
  > that God will judge us for making 
  erroneous/libelous judgments against
  those
  > that He considers righteous? 
  Izzy
  > 


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-14 Thread ShieldsFamily








Bill,

 

 Not being one of you
"big thinkers" I doubt I can answer these questions to your
satisfaction.  Only God knows who He
considers "righteous", as He can see the heart as well as all of a
person's actions/intents that we cannot. 


 

However the Bible tells us that (Gen 15:6) Abraham "believed
in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness." 

 

Deuteronomy 6:25 
"And it shall
be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the
LORD our God, as he hath commanded us."

 

So it seems to me that if one Believes
and, as a result, Obeys the Lord,
they are counted as righteous by Him. 
One problem in stating that someone is "stupid" in their
actions is that you cannot know what the Lord has told him to do (unless it is obviously
sin according to God's laws).  However, one indicator of whether someone
is a righteous man is the comportment of his life.  For example, is he truthful, loyal,
trustworthy, faithful, and does he give honor to his Lord? If he displays
integrity over a long period of time, with no obvious sin, one can assume that
he is living righteously. 

 

How will God judge us if we are not righteous? I would assume in both
this life and the next.  In this
life by the natural consequences of a sinful life, which are often not seen by
the outside world.  In the next by either
lack of rewards or even by hell itself.  That's about as much as I have figured
it out so far.  I'd appreciate any
further help on the subject myself.

 

Izzy 

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wm. Taylor
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

 

I'm curious, Izzy, Who is it whom God considers "righteous"
and how is it

that we can tell?

 

Another question, When you ask if "God will judge us," what
kind of judgment

do you have in mind; are you thinking in terms of something specific --

e.g., like maybe he will send us to hell?

 

Thanks,

    Bill

 

- Original Message -

From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:41 PM

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

 

 

> Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased Liberal

media,

> you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do you

think

> that God will judge us for making erroneous/libelous judgments
against

those

> that He considers righteous? Izzy

> 








Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-14 Thread Wm. Taylor
I'm curious, Izzy, Who is it whom God considers "righteous" and how is it
that we can tell?

Another question, When you ask if "God will judge us," what kind of judgment
do you have in mind; are you thinking in terms of something specific --
e.g., like maybe he will send us to hell?

Thanks,
Bill

- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush


> Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased Liberal
media,
> you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do you
think
> that God will judge us for making erroneous/libelous judgments against
those
> that He considers righteous? Izzy
>
> -Original Message-
>
> >
> > Lance wrote:
> > > My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same,
> > > is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews
> > > & talks which have been televised over the last
> > > several years.
> >
> > Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based upon hours of
> > interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert Einstein would come
> > across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.
> >
> > I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush speaking, but his
> > intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes and his strong
> > leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be
> > VERY intelligent.
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
> >
>
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-14 Thread ShieldsFamily
Lance, One final note on this.  If you only watch the biased Liberal media,
you will only get a biased view of GWBush.  And I'm wondering--do you think
that God will judge us for making erroneous/libelous judgments against those
that He considers righteous? Izzy

-Original Message-

>
> Lance wrote:
> > My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same,
> > is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews
> > & talks which have been televised over the last
> > several years.
>
> Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based upon hours of
> interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert Einstein would come
> across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.
>
> I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush speaking, but his
> intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes and his strong
> leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be
> VERY intelligent.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
>


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-14 Thread Lance Muir
DavidM:The word 'stupid' was a poor choice (a very poor choice). I stand by
the balance of what I said concerning Bush. Yes, I do think that one can
take the 'measure' of a person through their public performance.

 I've been called stupid and worse. There are occasions when it was
applicable.

PS:The 'Iraq choice' was, in my judgement, a blunder of the first order.

Lance
- Original Message - 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 14, 2004 14:24
Subject: [TruthTalk] President George Bush


> Lance wrote:
> > I don't hate him. I don't speak evil of him.
>
> Reality Check Please.
>
> Do you call your wife or children stupid?  Do you call your mother or
> father stupid?  Are there any loved ones that you call stupid?
>
> Perhaps you are deceiving yourself if you think calling someone who was
> intelligent enough to earn a bachelor's degree from Yale University and
> a Master of Business Administration from Harvard STUPID!  Let's also not
> forget that George Bush was intelligent enough to be elected Governor of
> Texas and also elected President of the United States.  How many stupid
> people do that?
>
> By the way, if I called you stupid, would that be speaking evil of you,
> or would you consider that to be a compliment?  I truly think you need
> to reconsider your reasons for calling Bush stupid.
>
> Lance wrote:
> > My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same,
> > is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews
> > & talks which have been televised over the last
> > several years.
>
> Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based upon hours of
> interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert Einstein would come
> across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.
>
> I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush speaking, but his
> intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes and his strong
> leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be
> VERY intelligent.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
>
> --
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


[TruthTalk] President George Bush

2004-06-14 Thread David Miller
Lance wrote:
> I don't hate him. I don't speak evil of him. 

Reality Check Please.

Do you call your wife or children stupid?  Do you call your mother or
father stupid?  Are there any loved ones that you call stupid?  

Perhaps you are deceiving yourself if you think calling someone who was
intelligent enough to earn a bachelor's degree from Yale University and
a Master of Business Administration from Harvard STUPID!  Let's also not
forget that George Bush was intelligent enough to be elected Governor of
Texas and also elected President of the United States.  How many stupid
people do that?  

By the way, if I called you stupid, would that be speaking evil of you,
or would you consider that to be a compliment?  I truly think you need
to reconsider your reasons for calling Bush stupid.

Lance wrote:
> My 'opinion' of his brightness or, lack of same, 
> is simply based on many (many) hours of interviews 
> & talks which have been televised over the last 
> several years.

Do you really think that we can judge intelligence based upon hours of
interviews made for television? I wonder how Albert Einstein would come
across on television interviews.  His photos sure make him look dumb.

I use to think like you did when I first saw Bush speaking, but his
intelligence is very evident in the decisions he makes and his strong
leadership in spite of political pressures.  I now consider Bush to be
VERY intelligent. 

Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.