Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hello

2015-02-02 Thread Eric Hedekar
Is this specific to the Ubuntu Studio section of the forums?

-Eric
On 2 Feb 2015 20:30, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:

 On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:12:01 -0500, Mike Holstein wrote:
 how can i help you? im not clear on what your question is regarding..

 I deleted the OP's mail. Somebody needs to translate it.

 Anyway ...

 2015-02-02 5:49 GMT-05:00 Önder ÖNEr onderone...@gmail.com:
  Ubuntu forum kurallarında, moderatörleri, kullanıcılara, kibar ve
   ^
  seçkin olmaya davet editorum.. Önder Öner


 So there might be an issue on the Ubuntu forum regarding moderation and
 editing.

 --
 ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
 ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

-- 
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 85, Issue 5

2014-05-12 Thread Eric Hedekar
The trouble with creating such a list is the sheer upkeep of said list.
There are bug listings and some blueprints in launchpad (on my phone now so
I don't have the links), but the development team does much more than
that.  Art for each release (icons, wallpapers, etc...), documentation for
new procedures, testing on various platforms, finding new features to add
(new program releases), packaging new programs, etc... the list is large
and constantly changing.  Well it's either constantly changing or it's too
generic to be meaningful.  Essentially, if you'd like to help out one of
the first steps is opening an IRC chat client like xchat and going to the
#ubuntustudio-devel room to start asking what you can help with, then just
pick a direction and do it.  We're all friendly, just  start asking
questions and decide where your strengths fit in.

-Eric
On 12 May 2014 05:37, Joseph Ronne jfro...@gmail.com wrote:

 It would be nice to see a list of the tasks, just to get an Idea of where
 to fit in ..





 --
 ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
 ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


-- 
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


[Bug 1253009] Re: [FFe] Please sync latest upstream release (0.9x) from Debian unstable - Pitivi developers recommends to use 0.92 or later

2014-04-07 Thread Eric Hedekar
As an old (and returning) Ubuntu Studio Developer I would support this
FFE as the current version shipped is clearly past its end-of-life
state.  I will try to test it out personally soon but according to
reports above, the new version is working well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253009

Title:
  [FFe] Please sync latest upstream release (0.9x) from Debian unstable
  - Pitivi developers recommends to use 0.92 or later

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pitivi/+bug/1253009/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1253009] Re: [FFe] Please sync latest upstream release (0.9x) from Debian unstable - Pitivi developers recommends to use 0.92 or later

2014-04-07 Thread Eric Hedekar
My tests on the debian package in 14.04 turned out positive.  I fully
support inclusion into 14.04 if the release team allows it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253009

Title:
  [FFe] Please sync latest upstream release (0.9x) from Debian unstable
  - Pitivi developers recommends to use 0.92 or later

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pitivi/+bug/1253009/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Making Studio work with more than one DE

2013-05-22 Thread Eric Hedekar
This really was one of the most dramatic train/thread derailments I've seen
in a while.  Impressive.

As far as other desktop environments are concerned, part of me is in favour
of this mindset being adopted (as I've never left gnome despite Ubuntu
Studio's switch to xfce - I just don't like that DE).  If a modular front
end was adopted then it would encourage wider usage and a better overall
design.  However, what Hartmut may have been trying to state was that this
is development is probably not the best use of developer's time.  There
have almost always been stability issues, bugs, and lack of documentation
in Ubuntu Studio that the user sees as more drastic to their workflow than
annoying quirks from the given DE.  So yeah, apply force to the major
problems, but it would be a prudent philosophy to reduce the amount of
xfce-specific code that ships with the distro.  We don't know how long into
the future the xfce platform will best suit our needs (very little warning
was given during the gnome/unity move that prompted our switch to xfce in
the first place), and the lack of DE-specific code the easier it will be
for those of us who love a different DE to just switch.

-Eric Hedekar

*
Eric Hedekar
*http://www.erichedekar.com


On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:

 Getting audio working for audio production, with some bloated desktop
 environments is not very useful. Some desktop environemts do start a
 chunk of services by default to automagically enable usage for many
 things, so the user needs to customize those desktops for audio work, or
 somebody from the community has to do it. There are common workflows for
 pro-audio work and even while I could add a list of odd things, caused
 by Xfce, it's a sane choice to use it as the default for Ubuntu Studio.
 I'm using it on other Linux installs too.

 Pulseaudio is something that should be discussed. It's not an issue to
 have it installed and to disable it, but it's an issue for users who
 start sessions by scripts, if there is the need to start qjackctl, but
 to kill qjackctl.real or what ever it's called ;). I don't remember
 what the qjackctl(.fake)-script does and can't take a look at it at
 the moment, but IIRC it did something that also could be started by
 qjackctl, instead of naming a script qjackctl and then let it start
 qjackctl.real.

 IMO it's already annoying if I need to start an app by it's name, but to
 kill it by killing python, however, this at least makes sense, while
 this qjackctl.thingy is an exotic Ubuntu Studio unique thing, that IMO
 isn't well thought out. A wrapper sometimes is useful, but this wrapper
 is strange.


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: LMMS

2012-10-14 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote:

 The ubuntu version of LMMS seems to come with VST support including wine
 (depends not recomends). We have had some of this stuff before and there
 has been issues with 64bit ISO builds as I recall. In other words a 64bit
 machine can load wine but the ISO still doesn't build. We had that problem
 before we went to live ISO... so there would be another problem as well.
 When wine loads it grabs the windows fonts which are free but licensed.
 The user has to ok the license. I don't know that this would be possible
 with ubiquity... Doesn't work with jackd. It may be best to leave it as
 extra SW. Interesting thing is that as installed, the software center
 can't see LMMS even though synaptic can. The sources have to be added
 under other software - Canonical Partners and/or Independent, before it
 shows up. This may mean it is not considered to be _in_ the ubuntu repos.

 Also after ISO install software center can't install software until the
 update manager has been run at least once (bug reported and confirmed,
 seems not to be a US problem).


 --
 Len Ovens
 www.OvenWerks.net



Quite right.  There are licensing issues that LMMS is currently built with
in the repos that we can't exactly include by default.  It would take a lot
of work to tweak and maintain a different LMMS build, and even then we'd be
creating a reduced feature set for the end user and those who really want
to use the program would likely install a different version (or be
discouraged by our included version and not use the program at all).  It's
probably best to stick with more fully open and free software, suggesting
LMMS to those interested in using VST-based production methods, possibly
via a suggestion in our help documents.

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: LMMS

2012-10-14 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote:


 On Sun, October 14, 2012 6:20 pm, Eric Hedekar wrote:

  Also, I just checked.  The LMMS binary is built upstream in Debian and
  inherited into Ubuntu.  So disabling the wine dependency (and thus VST
  support) would then disable it for all Debian distributions.  I don't
  believe this is an option worth considering.

 Wouldn't listing the fonts package in the blacklist seed stop the live ISO
 from adding that?

 I think we should try it. I think it would do one of three things:

 1) apt will try and install it anyway and the ISO won't build
 2) apt will add it to the stuff that needs to be installed but won't
 because of the blacklist and so will download the installer at install
 time and at first update will run the installer and the user will get the
 license screen.
 3) the font will not install and the user will not be able to install
 afterwards either (because of black list - I don't think so)
 4) (where did this come from?) the font will not install but the user will
 be able to install latter.

 1 and 3 are bad, 2 and 4 are ok. 1a) apt will add it to the ISO build but
 the accept will not happen so it won't load... this may be ok.

 So now its five things :)


I'm not exactly sure what will take place if the recommended font package
gets blacklisted.  I'm also not sure of the legality of this - i.e. will
the font package in question appear on our ISO and do we have legal rights
to do this with our/ubuntu's distribution policies?

I will say that the users may complain that wine does not run nicely unless
these fonts are installed after.  If you've blacklisted the fonts then can
they ever install them without throwing a conflict error?  There's a lot of
testing that will need to be worked on here.  Wine is quite a big element
of many people's computers.  Be careful what you blacklist.  Fairly soon I
think some MOTU consultation should take place on this matter.  Len can you
look into these questions?

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: LMMS?

2012-10-02 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote:

 **
 On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:15:30 +0200, Scott Lavender 
 scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all.

 In #ubuntustudio today somebody asked if we should add LMMS to it.

 I agree we need to since it is a crucial part of the system and it takes
 only about 10 MB of disk space so...

 BTW I talked to Nicholas Skaggs and the final decision was to dump the
 manual partitioning and auto-resize testcases and only remain the entire
 disk one along with live session and the forecoming post-installation
 testcases.

 Thanks everybody

 Regards,
 Howard Chan (smartboyhw)

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


 I think characterizing this as a crucial part of the system might be
 misrepresenting LMMS as I think Ubuntu Studio is quite functional in
 numerous use cases.

 We should also consider how many people are asking for LMMS. If we
 included every application asked for, we would easily oversize the 4gig
 image. I have been worried about making everyone download extra megs (oh,
 won't someone think of the bandwidth) because one person said we should
 include something.

 However, I am not opposed to including it. I just want to make sure we
 evaluate the inclusion on it's own merits, that we are supported a complete
 work flow (i.e. there are no other applications needed to support getting
 the task done), and the user demand warrants inclusion.

 I look forward to other's input.

 ScottL


 I think it's a valid addition.
 I know some people prefer this kind of applications to Qtractor or Ardour.
 On their homepage they make reference to LMMS being a Linux alternative
 to FL Studio. In my experience there are FL Studio people, and then there
 is the other kind.
 Don't use it myself, but I definitely think it fills a workflow hole for
 a good portion of people.

 i found LMMS to be crashy in 10.04... and i havent used it since really.
 if its stable and something that others want added, im OK with that. i
 always thought that even if it worked and was stable, my opinion was that
 it was toy-ish... we cant include *everything* and there are some key
 pieces of my workflow that are not installed that i have no issues with
 installing on my own. however, if someone wants to host a meeting, and
 vote on the inclusion of LMMS, i'll come and participate, and not vote it
 down, since i have no strong opinions other than it needs to be stable.

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel




 --
 MH

 mikeholstein.info http://www.mikeholstein.info/



 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel



This is certainly not the first discussion we've had about including LMMS,
and it probably won't be the last.  None of the past conversations have
come to a conclusion that it should be included as there are other more
polished tools that complete the same or similar workflow.  LMMS has had
stability issues in the past but maybe it's outgrown these now.  My
personal vote would be to include it in the 'suggested install' section and
leave it off the actual disk.  It's possible that reorganization of the
workflows and meta packages could find a slot where LMMS fits perfectly,
but I don't believe there's a spot it would fill right now.

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: colour selection app

2012-08-03 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote:


 On Sun, July 29, 2012 6:58 am, Eric Hedekar wrote:

  Currently there are two color management systems shipped with the
  graphics package, argyll and gnome-color-management.  Neither of these
 are
  color pickers.
 
  My go-to color picker is gcolor2 and would highly recommend this one to
 be
  picked for such a task.
  I also see that Agave is no longer shipped with the graphics package
  (silly
  IMHO, but I mean no offense) this could also be a realistic option.  I'm
  not sure which would be a better selection between Agave and gcolor2 (it
  depends on your task).

 Revisting this, Agave seems to have the function that gcolor2 has plus
 more and there for recommend using this for our color chooser.

 Cast your vote here Comments please?



 --
 Len Ovens
 www.OvenWerks.net


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Agave +1

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: a2jmidid auto start

2012-04-09 Thread Eric Hedekar
Well many people don't know about a2jmidid so if we start seeing a lot of
apps using the new platform it would be good to have it automagically
running behind the scenes.  This type of sctipt would be perfect to
integrate into Ubuntu Studio Controls so users can turn the script on/off.
On Apr 9, 2012 12:19 AM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote:

 Just tried putting a2jmidid  in qjackctl setup as execute script after
 startup. Seems to work really well for me. I don't know if it is worth
 while making that a default or not. Not for 12.04 because most of the midi
 apps aren't jack. I think there will be a number of people using ardour
 and hydrogen... even adding tracker and qtracker and qsynth doesn't need
 a2j. But when we add ardour3 that may change unless jackd3 adds that
 functionality (and gets here by that time).


 --
 Len Ovens
 www.OvenWerks.net


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Wallpaper suggestion

2011-11-27 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Tobias Schröfel
tschroe...@googlemail.comwrote:

  Hey guys,

 i would like to send you some pictures i created, a friend of mine
 suggested me to send the pictures to you because maybe you would like them
 too and consider using them in a future release.
 Currently the images are licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA but it
 would be no problem to relicense the images. Also it is no problem to
 export them to other file formats.

 Long story short, the images i would like to show you all:
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/tschroefel/6368302567/in/set-72157628062295781
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/tschroefel/6368303055/in/set-72157628062295781
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/tschroefel/6368287261/in/set-72157628062295781

 Greetings
 Tobias

 PS: I was unsure if file attachements or links would be better, if
 externally hostet images are not wanted i can send the stuff via mail also
 ;-)

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Those are certainly nice images that would easily fit into our design
goals.  I personally prefer 1  3, and since 23 are of the same synth it
may be silly to include both.

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


[Bug 427627] Re: Super high score w/ multiple 5's

2011-11-12 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: gnome-games (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427627

Title:
  Super high score w/ multiple 5's

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/427627/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 427627] Re: Super high score w/ multiple 5's

2011-11-12 Thread Eric Hedekar
Just tested this in FiveOrMore with figures containing four lines of
five and five lines of five.  The outrageous bonus score has been fixed.
This was in version 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 from Ubuntu 11.10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427627

Title:
  Super high score w/ multiple 5's

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/427627/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Workflow Meeting

2011-11-07 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Nov 7, 2011 12:31 PM, Janne Jokitalo astralj...@kapsi.fi wrote:

  2011/11/7 Jon Reagan jreaga...@gmail.com:
  Hey everyone!
 
  As mentioned in the IRC meeting held yesterday, a meeting needs to be
  scheduled regarding workflows, a method of allowing users to select
  which packages are installed by their personal needs at first install.
 snip
  What time during this
  week would work for everyone to hold a meeting to discuss this?

 Missed the initial email, so apologies for breaking the threading/order.

 I'm available almost any time throughout the week, with the exception of
 Wednesday between 1000 UTC and 1400 UTC.


 --
 Jaska


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

 iEYEARECAAYFAk64QBYACgkQxgcH0NnJT+BpbwCggYLLOO5AW6SOaG2j5nX1z7fL
 eWcAnAwfl+vdcbXxMij6gl2KMLhfayzn
 =usj0
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


I'd love to be involved in this process. This week I'm free Wed onward from
about 00:30utc to roughly 08:30utc each day. Sunday is almost totally open
right now too.
-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: US website theme RFC request for screenshots

2011-04-19 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Jorge G. Mare jorge.g.m...@gmail.comwrote:

 Howdy,

 On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Scott Lavender
 scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote:
  This is amazing.  I am very impressed with the improvement.

 Glad you like it. I am more and more satisified with the looks and
 overall theme and colors. The slideshow navigation is still a bit
 weird, though. but I will fix it.

  I really look forward to building the content for this :)

 I would like to do more work on the theme before putting it online on
 an staging URL. Hopefully next weekend or the week after that.

 Cheers,

 Jorge

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel



Hey Jorge,

I just had some time to sit down and review this thread - took a look at the
screen shots too - and my first reactions were quite impressed.  I'm not so
sold on having the old blurry lights image in the header, but upon looking
at more screenshots it started to fade into the background.  A few nitpicky
items do jump to mind: 1) The admin link should not be anywhere on the
site.  All the people who have access to the admin of the site, know how to
get there without the clickable link.  This just encourages attempted
security intrusions.  2)  Is there a usecase for a user profile page?  i.e.
who will have authority to create content on the site?  3) Can we see a few
screenshots outside of the admin login (i.e. a new blog post or story
without the edit links above)?

And one not-so nitpicky thing that could be a major thorn for us eventually;
the twitter feed - which is a great idea (I'm fine with just grabbing any
#ubuntustudio hashtag post) - inherently relies on a new drupal module being
loaded to the site.  Any new drupal module will need to undergo a full
scrutiny by Cannonical's web security team before their admins okay its
upload.  This means we need to decide upon which modules we'll need for this
web update/revamp sooner rather than later and get that process underway.

Nice work so far.  It does look like I'm going to have a free day every two
weeks or so (starting in about a month) to chime in more than I have been
and help with the implementation work.  Keep up the nice tweaks.

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Ubuntu Studio 11.10 UI discussion. GNOME3, Unity, XFCE and Studio users workflow.

2011-04-12 Thread Eric Hedekar
I for one, have spent the past ten years using the Gnome interface and feel
very comfortable in it.  So much so that I anticipate UI annoyances to drive
me away from Ubuntu if they stick with Ubiquity.  Sorry if that's a
rant/uncompromising attitude, I just wanted to share with the group my
honest and heartfelt feelings on the subject (and yes I have been giving
Ubiquity a steady test run over the last year or so).

XFCE does not seem like it has anything to offer other than old/reliable
code.  It's not even that much lighter than Gnome from what I understand
last time I looked into it.

- Eric Hedekar



On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Tim Pitman tapitma...@gmail.com wrote:

 Here's another vote for XFCE

 On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:05 PM, ailo ailo...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 04/11/2011 07:26 PM, ailo wrote:
  To test Gnome3 with Ubuntu ScottL tipped us about this one:
  http://ugr.teampr0xy.net/
 
  This didn't work for me.
  I'm moving on to Fedora Alpha release and will give that a testrun with
  some multimedia programs instead.
 
  --
  ailo
 
  --
  Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
  Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
  Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
 

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: monthly meetings

2011-03-06 Thread Eric Hedekar
I know I've been sporadically involved as of late, but seeing as I've made
the commitment to help with the web revamp I should mention that I cannot
attend at this time due to work.  Please don't worry about this as I'll try
to both read up on the minutes when I have time and keep in touch with
others involved in the web revamp.  Feel free to also discuss this subject
without my presence.  Hope all is well with everyone.

- Eric Hedekar



On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote:

 regular monthly meetings the first sunday of the month starting this
 sunday, march 6th... the time is 10am eastern standard time... PLEASE LET ME
 KNOW if you have trouble finding out what time this is in your local time
 zone... eastern standard time is US/new york..
 for example:
 10:00:00 a.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 in America/New_York converts to
 03:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 in GMT
 http://www.timezoneconverter.com/ might be helpful...

 ...also, if there needs to be a special meeting set up for a specific
 purpose, such as meeting with the website team, and this time is bad for key
 members, additional meetings can and should be added anytime for this
 purpose... thanks

 --
 MH

 http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/
 http://wnclug.ourproject.org/


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Website

2011-02-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Brian David beej...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Brian David beej...@gmail.com wrote:

  Yes, I am experienced with creating themes with Drupal.  I would say
  that the Impact theme needs a bit of touching up, but it's pretty
  close to complete.
 
  What I really would like to know is exactly how this gets done.

 Well, I'll go ahead and start building the Drupal theme to get things
 started.  It'll take a little while to get that done.  In the
 meantime, Eric, let me know what things you would like to discuss in
 detail about the theme.

 --
 -Brian David


At this point I've taken this discussion off-list for primarily security
purposes.  If anyone wants to follow the discussion or be updated on
progress, let Brian, Scott, or I know and we will update accordingly.

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Website

2011-02-04 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Brian David beej...@gmail.com wrote:

 Natty is not too far off, and it's been a while since there was any
 updates on what is going on with the website.  I believe there was a
 meeting over a month ago about this subject, but no minutes were sent
 out.

 So, I was wondering if we could get an update on the current state of
 the website re-design?

 --
 -Brian David


Hey Brian,

You and I need to have a brief chat (maybe we should CC Scott L in the
process) about the current state of the Impact theme.  Is it ready to be
implemented into a full Drupal theme?  Do you have any experience creating a
Drupal theme?  As the artistic designer of the Impact theme are there any
final touches that you think need to be made to it? etc...

I have put myself forward as the guy who will work on a major portion of the
back end for this overhaul, but I have extremely limited time and have been
letting this slide too far.  I don't want to let it slide much further.
Though natty has no bearing on our site's progress (it'll be ready when it's
ready).

Soon source files of images, fonts, colours, etc... all need to be hammered
down to exact specs.

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: IRC meeting

2010-11-25 Thread Eric Hedekar
 Let's just keep the original time for the meeting.  A co-worker asked to
trade shifts this week anyway so it all works out in the end.

-Eric

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote:

 hey eric, i feel like all of those options are fine... i think 24 hours
 later would be better than an hour earlier... i also feel like 30 minutes
 for the meeting length would be a good goal... i'll leave it up to you, if
 you want to move it, just send an email with a topic like *new irc meeting
 time* or something like that... lets make it so you can attend... if you
 prefer, i can do the mailing if we need to change the time, let me know...
 thanks..


 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Eric Hedekar aftertheb...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.comwrote:

 there will be a website planning meeting in #ubuntustudio-devel on the
 freenode network Wednesday, December 1st @ 01:00:00 UTC.
 let me know ASAP if there is a more convenient time. thanks

 freenode webchat link to the IRC 
 channelhttp://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntustudio-develuio=d4
 --
 MH
 http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein

 http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


 I'd love to attend this meeting but I'll be leaving for work half an hour
 after the meeting starts (not ideal).  Could we bump the time up an hour
 earlier, or maybe 24 hours later?  I have quite a bit of info about the
 current state of things and would love to help move the site forward.

 Thanks
 -Eric Hedekar

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel




 --
 MH
 http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein

 http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: IRC meeting

2010-11-23 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote:

 there will be a website planning meeting in #ubuntustudio-devel on the
 freenode network Wednesday, December 1st @ 01:00:00 UTC.
 let me know ASAP if there is a more convenient time. thanks

 freenode webchat link to the IRC 
 channelhttp://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntustudio-develuio=d4
 --
 MH
 http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein

 http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


I'd love to attend this meeting but I'll be leaving for work half an hour
after the meeting starts (not ideal).  Could we bump the time up an hour
earlier, or maybe 24 hours later?  I have quite a bit of info about the
current state of things and would love to help move the site forward.

Thanks
-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: IRC meeting

2010-11-23 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote:

 there will be a website planning meeting in #ubuntustudio-devel on the
 freenode network Wednesday, December 1st @ 01:00:00 UTC.
 let me know ASAP if there is a more convenient time. thanks

 freenode webchat link to the IRC 
 channelhttp://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntustudio-develuio=d4
 --
 MH
 http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein

 http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


I'd love to attend this meeting but I'll be leaving for work half an hour
after the meeting starts (not ideal).  Could we bump the time up an hour
earlier, or maybe 24 hours later?  I have quite a bit of info about the
current state of things and would love to help move the site forward.

Thanks
-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Tasks, Workflows, and Packages for Ubuntu Studio Natty

2010-11-14 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:59 PM, bart deruyter bart.deruy...@gmail.comwrote:


 2010/11/11 Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz

 On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 16:36 -0500, Scott Lavender wrote:
  Hello again.
 
  We are almost a month from the first Alpha image for Ubuntu Studio and
  I wanted to share an update about Ubuntu Studio Natty Narwhal 11.04.
 
 Sorry for not replying earlier. To my mind lilypond + frescobaldi far
 superior to mscore. But if both are in the archive that's OK. Actually
 I'm not sure if frescobaldi is in the archive or if I installed it from
 somewhere else.

 You might also consider putting Fomus, and, when it has been packaged,
 Common Music, from the puredyne ppa in the archive. A lot of development
 is going into CM + fomus + lily. I am working on another front end to
 this system, called Kaa, which I hope will end up as a sort of
 compositional rapid prototype tool.

 Bernard


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


 Lilypond + frescobaldi might be more difficult to learn indeed, but I agree
 with it's quality. On top of that mscore doesn't have the possibility to add
 tabs to your score (perhaps an svn version can, but I guess it's not quite
 stable yet). Ok, there's tuxguitar for that, but tuxguitar is not really
 ment for printing, more for displaying on a screen. In my experience
 printing from tuxguitar is not good at all. Perhaps the option is to keep
 lilypond installed by default,and add frescobaldi (or have it at least in
 the archive).

 The version of mscore that was installed in 10.04 by default was very buggy
 too. Ironically I had to install a newer, unstable version, to have it
 stable (dragging slurs caused crashes). So it was actually useless to have
 it installed by default in the first place.

 grtz,
 Bart

 http://www.bartart3d.be/


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users



As I've voiced to the other developers in IRC, I also see Lilypond +
Frescobaldi as the best notation software for those who want to write
anything complex (though guitar tabs isn't really even that complex).  I
have added a workflow, which includes Lilypond and Frescobaldi, to the wiki
page where all of this is being hashed out - *AND I ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO
ADD TO THE WIKI PAGE* to get more processes and veiwpoints involved in this
development process.  Bernard, for instance should probably add a workflow
that includes Common Music if that task isn't already taken by a superior
program or other workflows (maybe even if it is).

Without community involvement adjusting the wiki page a lot of the
suggestions in this e-mail thread will fall to the dregs of past history
without full consideration by all developers.  Please add your ideas to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Workflows

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Made With UbuntuStudio Logos

2010-11-02 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Scott Lavender
scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote:



 On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:05 PM, scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote:

  On Oct 29, 2010 12:29pm, G M Slater precipitous.me...@cox.net wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
  Fellow UbuntuStudio users:
 
 
 
  Is there an official Made With UbuntuStudio logo? My latest album
  was recorded almost entirely using it, and I would like to be able
  to advertise that fact. It seems like a great way to draw more
  deserved attention to an incredible OS. In case anyone is
  interested, the music (dark ambient) is freely available at
 http://soundcloud.com/occurrences-in-rain
 
 
 
 
  If there is not an official logo, is there any particular graphic
  other enthusiasts are using?
 


This is a subject that was brought up on this list back in June and a few
nice (in my opinion) examples were created.  Here's the link to the original
poster's e-mail (including links to download all the creations):
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-June/002401.html

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Dependency problem between ubuntustudio-font-meta and ttf-symbol-replacement-wine1.3

2010-11-02 Thread Eric Hedekar
 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Takashi Sakamoto
o-taka...@sakamocchi.jpwrote:

 Hi,

 I utilize wine1.3 from Wine Team's PPA and have a dependency
 problembetween ubuntustudio-font-meta and ttf-symbol-replacement.

 In detail, please read my post to ubuntu-wine-team.
 https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+question/132189

 Of cource I'm sure that it's a user's own risk to use some packages from
 PPA. But the latest wine package is very useable with some windows
 binary of VST plugins. I daily use FeSTige for these plugins and it
 works fine with Wine1.3.

 So can we modify next ubuntustudio-font-meta package's dependency for
 both of ttf-symbol-replacement and ttf-symbol-replacement-wine1.X? This
 may avoid making users confused.

 Regards


 Takashi Sakamoto
 o-taka...@sakamocchi.jp


Hi Takashi,

Uninstalling ttf-symbol-replacement will NOT remove all of the other fonts
in the font meta, nor will it remove the other packages in the graphics
meta, it will merely remove the empty meta packages themselves.  It is safe
to replace this at will.

Because ttf-symbol-replacement-wine1.X is not in ubuntu's repositories but
rather in a non-Ubuntu-Studio related PPA I personally don't agree with the
requested change to the font-meta.  We should not be listing non-repository
packages in our metas unless the Ubuntu Studio team has a direct connection
to them.

This is obviously just my opinion, but because the conflict is a harmless
one anyways, I don't think there is much motivation to change the way things
are currently.  Sorry if this causes unnessecary stress or confusion.

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Vacation reply

2010-11-01 Thread Eric Hedekar
Dear Mike, I'm pretty sure nobody on this list cares about your vacation
(though I'm sure we're all hoping you're having a relaxing time).  Please
setup your vacation reply to ignore list mail next time.  Thanks.

- Eric Hedekar


On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:12 PM, m...@socopro.com wrote:

 This is an autmatic generated reply.  We will be in touch within 24 hours.

 Thank you

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Wrong information of release note for 10.10

2010-10-22 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Takashi Sakamoto
o-taka...@sakamocchi.jpwrote:

 Hi,

 I translated Maverick's release note for Japanese users. I've already
 put my text on Ubuntu Japanese Community Wiki.
 https://wiki.ubuntulinux.jp/UbuntuStudioTips/ReleaseNotes

 Then I have some questions.

 1. kernel flavour

 According to Alessio's message, we cannot use -lowlatency and -realtime
 for Maverick and I found there are no kernel packages for Maverick in
 his PPA.


 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-October/002695.html


 2. Audio group

 I think MusE needs for users to join in audio group. In my machine, I
 can't start MusE if I'm not in audio group.


 3. lv2 packages with question mark

 We can download and install both lv2vocoder and lv2-c++-tools.
 So there is no need with question mark.

 In my text, I added some notes in each parts. I want the administrator
 to check these items and make appropriate modification.

 Regards


 Takashi Sakamoto
 o-taka...@sakamocchi.jp

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel



Points 1 and 3 have been updated on the ubuntustudio.org website, I'll wait
for further clarification from others regarding point 2 before changing that
warning.  I seem to recall a lengthy discussion on that subject in the
mailing list.  I was merely copying text from the wiki's working release
notes and not proof-reading as much as I should have been (hence the
question marks remaining), sorry for the mistake.

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: How to get ubuntu studio from an ubuntu standard

2010-08-11 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote:


 On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Kenneth Koym koy...@gmail.com wrote:

 ScottL, your statement boggles my mind. Could you rewrite it so it says
 what you mean to say. You ask the recipient to be careful --- okay. You talk
 about a real-time kernel and an older kernel. Then you say, However,,, 
 What do you mean ScottL. Say it without all the extras!
  Kenneth



 Ubuntu and Ubuntu Studio include the 2.6.35 kernel in a default
 installation in lucid (10.04).

 A real-time 2.6.35 kernel is not available in any of the official
 repositories in Ubuntu.

 The linked documentation to upgrade to Ubuntu Studio suggests installing
 the linux-rt package.

 The linux-rt pacakge for lucid (10.04) is a 2.6.31kernel with real-time
 preemption.  Note that this is an older kernel version.


 Therefore, if Aradnix complied absolutely with the documentation's
 suggestions he would experience a regression in kernel version.

 Real-time preemption would be gained but the older kernel version (2.6.31)
 may not include some particular hardware driver that was included in the
 default installed kernel (2.6.35) included with Lucid.  This may or may not
 be a problem depending on his hardware.


Just a quick technicality correction Scott, Lucid 10.04 ships with the
2.6.32 kernel, not the 2.6.35.  The facts you state are true of the 2.6.32
(no RT patch, etc...).

It should also be noted that the audio portion of Ubuntu Studio 10.04
includes the new PREEMPT kernel flavour of 2.6.32 which I've found to be
suitable for audio work.

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: update ubuntu studio package list page?

2010-05-04 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote:



 On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:

   (forgive what will probably be one of many nitpicky observations as
 i claw my way thru ubuntu studio as a beginner.)

   from the main wiki page:

   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio

 there's a link to the package list here:

   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/PackageList

 but that list can't be up-to-date since it was apparently last edited
 in early 2009.

 rday



 Robert,

 I would suggest that users start with the help.ubuntu pages:
 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio

 This seems to be geared more towards users, at least to me.  And it
 certainly looks prettier ;)

 As far as the applications, please see:
 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications

 I have taken pains attempting to keep this up to date.  I hope you find it
 useful.

 Lastly, I appreciate your nitpicky-ness.  That attention to detail and
 willingness to point out discrepancies is needed.  Have you considered
 helping the developers?  Reviewing the documentation may seem a trivial task
 but can greatly improve Ubuntu Studio overall.

 Thanks again,
 ScottL


I would also like to add that the pages pointed out are on the wiki so it's
perfectly kosher to edit/update it as appropriate to reflect current
applications.  That is as long as you're confident enough in your own
knowledge to publish it.

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Showcase

2010-03-22 Thread Eric Hedekar
This list has no direct affiliation with the Ubuntu Free Culture Showcase.
I was on the jury and we handed in our shortlist a while back.  Now it's up
to the Community Council to pick winners, so maybe you should e-mail or IRC
someone on the community council if you're in dire need of a status update.

- Eric Hedekar


On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:06 PM, teza tsalio...@orange.fr wrote:

 Hi everybody, just wondering, any news about the showcase?

 Regards
 Teza




 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Studio Forum at Ubuntu Forums

2010-03-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Jussi Schultink juss...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All

 On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:37 PM, scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote:

 All,

 In an effort to create a better branding for Ubuntu Studio, which
 hopefully will also foster additional community involvement, we will be
 renaming the current forum at Ubuntu Forums that caters to Ubuntu Studio.
 The Ubuntu Forums admin have asked that we provide a new name and
 description.

 Currently, the name of the forum we use is Multimedia Production and its
 description is Discussions about Ubuntu Studio and other multimedia
 production applications. The name is used on the Ubuntu Forums home page
 under the Main Support Categories and the name and description can be viewed
 in the second gray box from the top on the Multimedia Production forum. See
 below for links:

 Ubuntu Forums main page - http://ubuntuforums.org/
 Multimedia Production page -
 http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=335

 My suggestion would be to use Ubuntu Studio as the forum name and use
 the current description as noted above.

 Your input and suggestions are greatly encouraged and appreciated.


 I agree here, either this or Ubuntu Studio Support. If you look at the
 other main support categories, there ones with just the name, Ubuntu One
 Ubuntu Moblin Remix etc and then others with Support tagged on:
 System76 Support  Dell Ubuntu Support. As we seem to identify more with
 the former group, I would +1 Scotts idea of just Ubuntu Studio

 Jussi.


I agree with everyone as well.  Ubuntu Studio would be a great name
change.

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Ubuntu Studio Forum at Ubuntu Forums

2010-03-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Fritz Meissner meissner.fr...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 5 March 2010 23:37, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.com wrote:
  Why don't we separate it into two subforums, development and general
  discussion.
  That way the developers and the users can be free to discuss related
  subjects within their own space.
  -Luis
 
 I  feel that the guiding principle is that information should be kept
 together in one place until the volume makes it necessary to split it.
 Start with one forum, we can always split it later when the traffic
 builds up. If the traffic is light, then it does no harm if users and
 devs are all fully aware of what is going on, in fact it's ideal.

 I'm assuming that the present Multimedia  Video and Multimedia
 Production forums will stay, as they field a lot of hardware
 questions which would totally swamp the Studio forum if they were
 combined with it.

 Fritz


I agree with your take on not splitting the forum (I think this would be a
bigger bureaucratic headache too), however from my understanding of Scott's
original proposal, Multimedia  Video is not a part of this discussion and
Multimedia Production is proposed to be changed to Ubuntu Studio.  The
two names are very similar and I've seen many posts in the wrong categories
because of this fact (another great argument to change the name of
Multimedia Production).

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


[Bug 360590] Re: Please compile portaudio with Jack support

2010-02-24 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
Please compile portaudio with Jack support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360590
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 183113] Re: [needs-packaging] zyn (LV2 soft synth)

2010-02-23 Thread Eric Hedekar
Changing to Fix Committed as the package has merely been uploaded, not
released yet.  Launchpad Janitor should automatically change this to Fix
Released once the package builds.

** Changed in: ubuntustudio
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

-- 
[needs-packaging] zyn (LV2 soft synth)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183113
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407841] Re: Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio 
servers from integrating with it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407841
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 109659] Re: jack sink missing in pulseaudio

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
Jack-Audio-Connection-Kit is now in Main so this bug is valid again.
Changing to Confirmed.

** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Status: Won't Fix = Confirmed

** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

-- 
jack sink missing in pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109659
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 109659] Re: jack sink missing in pulseaudio

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
Went to go write the patch to fix this bug, but it's already been
committed to the latest launchpad source!

-- 
jack sink missing in pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109659
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 84900] Re: libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

-- 
libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84900
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 152487] Re: Jack output for xine apps

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
Attaching a debdiff patch for xine-libs source package to enable
building against Jack now that Jack has been accepted into Main.

** Patch added: xine-lib_1.1.17-1ubuntu2.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39354643/xine-lib_1.1.17-1ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
Jack output for xine apps 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 152487] Re: Jack output for xine apps

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
Here's that same patch but in the proper order (going from 1ubuntu1 to
1ubuntu2).

** Patch added: xine-lib_1.1.17-1ubuntu2.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39356594/xine-lib_1.1.17-1ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
Jack output for xine apps 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 152487] Re: Jack output for xine apps

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
One more time, without the misplaced newline.

** Patch added: xine-lib_1.1.17-1ubuntu2.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39356736/xine-lib_1.1.17-1ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
Jack output for xine apps 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 360590] Re: Please compile portaudio with Jack support

2010-02-18 Thread Eric Hedekar
Attaching a patch to fix this bug now that Jack has been promoted into
Main.

** Patch added: portaudio19_19+svn20090620-0ubuntu2.debdiff
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39357151/portaudio19_19%2Bsvn20090620-0ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
Please compile portaudio with Jack support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360590
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 510481] Re: [MIR] Jack-audio-connection-kit

2010-02-17 Thread Eric Hedekar
Is this going to be looked at before feature freeze?  Or are MIR bugs
subject to feature freeze?

-- 
[MIR] Jack-audio-connection-kit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510481
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf

2010-02-15 Thread Eric Hedekar
I know this has been fixed upstream and it may already be fixed in
lucid's 0.6 version of xwax.  It is a simple fix to write a patch for
Karmic though.

-- 
Missing required font Vera.ttf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 453524] Re: Track fails to load into player

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
From talking with the upstream developers MOS-Marauder is correct in his
explanation.  Also, because the Xwax 0.6 package from Debian has now
been imported into Ubuntu, this bug can be marked as Fix Released.

** Changed in: xwax (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
Track fails to load into player
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Jack in Ubuntu Studio

2010-02-04 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Samuel Mehrbrodt s.mehrbr...@googlemail.com
 wrote:

 Thanks for your quick response.
 So will lucid have PulseAudio with Jack support?


Nobody knows.  But we're working toward that goal.
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: IRC anyone?

2010-02-02 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote:



 On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.comwrote:

 me too


 On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:28:49AM PST, Eric Hedekar wrote:
  On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com
 wrote:
 
   On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:59:31AM PST, Eric Hedekar wrote:
I know I can't make the usual time of 19:00UTC on the second sunday
 of
   the
month (i.e. I'm busy on Feb 14th).  Would we be able to do 19:00UTC
 this
Friday or Saturday (Feb 5th or 6th)?  That would give us enough
 time to
   act
on any last items before feature freeze.
  
   I can't do this weekend, either Friday or Saturday. Friday I will be
 at
   lunch since the platform sprint is on this week, and Saturday, I'l be
   traveling.
  
   Luke
  
  
  Hmm, having a meeting during the platform sprint doesn't sound like a
 wise
  idea (it's likely others that would want to attend wouldn't be able to.
  Can
  we do 19:00UTC on Wednesday Feb 10th?

 I can do that.

 uke

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel



 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

 good for me :)

 wiki uphttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Feb10


Well it just dawned on me that I didn't check the fridge before suggesting
this date/time and it looks like the Edubuntu team has a meeting at the same
time in #ubuntu-meeting.  We can either choose a different time or hold the
meeting in #ubuntustudio-devel  I think holding it in #ubuntustudio-devel
would be a better decision.

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: IRC anyone?

2010-02-01 Thread Eric Hedekar
I know I can't make the usual time of 19:00UTC on the second sunday of the
month (i.e. I'm busy on Feb 14th).  Would we be able to do 19:00UTC this
Friday or Saturday (Feb 5th or 6th)?  That would give us enough time to act
on any last items before feature freeze.

- Eric Hedekar


On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Jussi Schultink juss...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Scott Lavender 
 scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote:



 On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.comwrote:

 When should we have our next meeting on IRC?
 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


 The next regularly meeting should be February 14th I believe.  I'm
 guessing most people would rather wait until then.

 I'm good with whatever the group feels appropriate.


 Id be suprised if anyone comes, given what that day is in most
 countries...

 Jussi


 ScottL


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel



 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


[Bug 455239] Re: raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set

2010-01-29 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-controls
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

** Changed in: ubuntustudio-controls (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455239
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Ubuntu Free Culture Showcase

2010-01-28 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.dewrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Am 28.01.2010 21:09, schrieb Ricardo Lameiro:
  AFAIK they will enforce the 1Mb rule. they have very limited space on the
 CD

 Well then I wonder, for what audience the CD shall be attractive...


The CD we're talking about is the Ubuntu install CD.  The winner of the
contest (one in each category) will have their work installed to every
user's home directory as free content.  I think it would be pretty sweet to
have some grindcore stuff loaded on everyone's system, but I'm not too sure
if that would win the prize.

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Ubuntu Free Culture Showcase

2010-01-27 Thread Eric Hedekar
It's that time of year again to submit to the Ubuntu Free Culture Showcase
for your chance at having worldwide exposure to your masterpiece.
Audio, Graphic, and Video submissions will be accepted through to Feb 28th
2010.
More information at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFreeCultureShowcase

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


[Bug 455239] Re: raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set

2010-01-27 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-controls
   Status: New = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntustudio-controls (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455239
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 164719] Re: muse sequencer -new version

2010-01-26 Thread Eric Hedekar
I had uploaded my debdiff for 1.0rc2 to the debian bug on November 10th
2009, but the original maintainer has chosen to ignore this and instead
upload a minor bugfix release in debian.  I'd really like to see this
get updated for Lucid's cycle but time is running out on getting it
uploaded to Debian then merged back to Ubuntu before the freeze so I'm
attaching a new 1.0.1 debdiff here to be directly uploaded to Ubuntu.

** Attachment added: muse_1.0.1-0ubuntu1.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38401093/muse_1.0.1-0ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
muse sequencer -new version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164719
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 164719] Re: muse sequencer -new version

2010-01-26 Thread Eric Hedekar
Hi Fabrice, I'm not sure what caused the messy debdiff.  I followed the
process here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff

I'll take a look later and try to clean it up though.

-- 
muse sequencer -new version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164719
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 164719] Re: muse sequencer -new version

2010-01-26 Thread Eric Hedekar
Fabrice, attached is the diff.gz for muse_1.0.1-0ubuntu1
and the upstream tarball can be got from 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmuse/files/muse-1.0/muse-1.0/muse-1.0.1.tar.gz/download

The debdiff will inevitably contain all the source code changes from
0.8.1a to 1.0.1 making it impossible to review (I didn't realize it was
a 15+ line file when I attached it earlier, sorry).

I haven't gone through the debian packaging and refined it at all, and I
do notice some lintian warnings regarding maintainer address and watch
file that would be easy enough to fix.  Let me know if you'd like to to
adjust those.

** Attachment added: muse_1.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38440244/muse_1.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
muse sequencer -new version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164719
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 192664] Re: Please merge libming1 1:0.4.2-4 (universe) from debian experimental (main)

2010-01-25 Thread Eric Hedekar
Can we please see this merged soon?  A few other programs have major swf
related bugs that get fixed with the 0.4.2 version of ming.

-- 
Please merge libming1 1:0.4.2-4 (universe) from debian experimental (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192664
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 511334] [NEW] gst-plugins-bad0.10 should be built with libslv2-dev as a build-dep to enable the lv2 plugin

2010-01-22 Thread Eric Hedekar
Public bug reported:

As of Lucid, the libslv2-dev library is now in the Ubuntu repository so
gstreamer can be built against it to enable lv2 plugin support.

** Affects: gst-plugins-bad0.10 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gst-plugins-bad0.10 should be built with libslv2-dev as a build-dep to enable 
the lv2 plugin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511334
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 511334] Re: gst-plugins-bad0.10 should be built with libslv2-dev as a build-dep to enable the lv2 plugin

2010-01-22 Thread Eric Hedekar
attaching a debdiff that adds libslv2-dev to the build deps

** Attachment added: gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.17-1ubuntu3.debdiff
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38282577/gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.17-1ubuntu3.debdiff

-- 
gst-plugins-bad0.10 should be built with libslv2-dev as a build-dep to enable 
the lv2 plugin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511334
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 511334] Re: gst-plugins-bad0.10 should be built with libslv2-dev as a build-dep to enable the lv2 plugin

2010-01-22 Thread Eric Hedekar
Sorry, uploading a debdiff that goes in the right direction (i.e. from
ubuntu2 to ubuntu3).

** Attachment added: gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.17-1ubuntu3.debdiff
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38282624/gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.17-1ubuntu3.debdiff

-- 
gst-plugins-bad0.10 should be built with libslv2-dev as a build-dep to enable 
the lv2 plugin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511334
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Ubuntu Studio artwork question

2010-01-21 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Jussi Schultink juss...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.comwrote:

 Honestly, I feel like the addition of an official Ubuntu Studio forum
 (preferably separate from the messiness of the ubuntu forums) would be the
 most efficient way to encourage involvement. The wiki's are great ways to
 display user contributed artwork and such, but in my opinion, it acts as
 more of a gallery rather than a station for discussion and further
 development.

 Forums are quick to set up, free, and easy to maintain. I can see our
 forum separated into different categories such as Development, Bugs,
 Troubleshooting etc. However, in regards to art, the forum should be divided
 into several subforums:

 -Logo Design
 -Theme/Icon Design
 -Website Design/Improvements

 Moderators will also stick threads that they feel are becoming popular, or
 increasingly productive. This kind of structure will allow artists to not
 only upload their work quickly and effectively, but also pass their work
 through a medium that offers a community of critics.

 Forgive me if I sound intrusive, but I envision the future of Ubuntu
 Studio as being a well-respected linux distro focused on multimedia
 creation. A distro that offers artists, musicians, animators, and directors
 the chance to create their work on an open-source platform that is stable,
 efficient, graphically appealing, and simple. We really have a chance here
 to continue developing something magnificent, and in order to do so, we need
 a more tightly knit community.

 I agree forums are all that, but as an officially recognised derivative of
 Ubuntu, we need to make use of officially sanctioned areas. this isnt to say
 we cannot have our own, but that if possible, we should work with existing
 facilities. Second, by utilising the part of Ubuntu forums we have been
 given, we gain access to a lot more viewers, and thus a lot more possible
 contributors. If a decision is made that we need more room in the forums, or
 a different structure, I  am well familiar with the members of the forums
 council and can do the necessary liason work to make it happen.

 If you have time, please join our IRC channel and feel free to have a chat
 to us in realtime about it there.


Jussi, I personally greatly agree with your take on forums.  Maintaining our
own seems silly at best - we would also need to deal with errors of general
ubuntu, beginners, etc... in our own forum and there are some excellent
users within the Multimedia Production section.  I do think that we could
use a different category/organization on ubuntuforums.org  as Multimedia
Production has very little branding of our project.  In my mind, the
question is: What forum sections should we ask for?

My personal opinion on that question is that Ubuntu Studio should become a
section similar to the Development and Programming section.  Within that,
there should be a sections on Audio, Video, Graphic Design, and Gallery.

It would be great if we could integrate the look of our forum sections with
our website, but I'm not sure how practical that is.

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Jack inclusion in Main

2010-01-20 Thread Eric Hedekar
Hey Everyone,

Just curious what the status of the Jack main inclusion report is?  I see
there has been some work put in by Scott at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportJACK but I'm curious if that's
ready to create the launchpad bug?

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


[Bug 510481] [NEW] [MIR] Jack-audio-connection-kit

2010-01-20 Thread Eric Hedekar
Public bug reported:

jack-audio-connection-kit is needed in main to fix a number of bugs.

Full rationale explained at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportJACK

** Affects: jack-audio-connection-kit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[MIR] Jack-audio-connection-kit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510481
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 455239] Re: raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set

2010-01-16 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Also affects: ubuntustudio-controls
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455239
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 454082] Re: ubuntustudio-controls fail to write NICE settings

2010-01-16 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Also affects: ubuntustudio-controls
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
ubuntustudio-controls fail to write NICE settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454082
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 358763] Re: pencil crashed with SIGSEGV in SWFBlock_isDefined()

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Also affects: pencil via
   http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2722411
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
pencil crashed with SIGSEGV in SWFBlock_isDefined()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358763
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 507316] [NEW] LMMS requires an internet connection to install lmms-vst

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Hedekar
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: lmms

LMMS is included in the Ubuntu Studio install disks and the 'recommends'
status of lmms-vst forces the install procedure to be connected to the
internet to successfully install ttf-mscorefonts-installer (through the
dependency of wine).  This caused many failed installs during the Karmic
cycle.

The cleanest fix for this is to turn lmms-vst to a 'suggests' rather
than a 'recommends'.  This will not install the vst capabilities by
default, but those looking for VST (proprietary plugin format)
functionality will easily be able to install the extra package.
Furthermore this will encourage people to embrace the open ladspa and
dssi plugin formats.  No VST plugins are available from the ubuntu
repositories, so there is minimal argument for keeping this feature as a
'recommends'.

** Affects: lmms (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
LMMS requires an internet connection to install lmms-vst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507316
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 507316] Re: LMMS requires an internet connection to install lmms-vst

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Hedekar
Attaching a debdiff fix for this bug, merely switching lmms-vst to a
suggests.

** Attachment added: lmms_0.4.5-0ubuntu2.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37870956/lmms_0.4.5-0ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
LMMS requires an internet connection to install lmms-vst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507316
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Only jack supports firewire audio devices at this time.

2010-01-06 Thread Eric Hedekar
Jack uses the ffado driver to connect to the devices.  You require ffado
support for any firewire soundcard on linux at this time.

-Eric

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Steve Meiers tekry...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Luke mentioned Only jack supports firewire audio devices at this time. in
 his previous message, copied below. I have a few questions regarding Jack's
 firewire support.

 How well does Jack support firewire?

 Do I still need a ffado supported device and driver to use within Jack or
 does Jack support any and all firewire audio devices without additional
 drivers, etc?

 Basically, is it plug-and-play, like most USB midi or USB audio devices
 that I plug into Ubuntu?

 So far, there are no ffado drivers for my ADAT-firewire hardware; so it
 would be very cool, but I suspect the answer is sadly no.

 Thanks.

 Steve
 --


 Message: 6
 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:58:59 +1100
 From: Luke Yelavich 
 them...@ubuntu.comhttp://mc/compose?to=them...@ubuntu.com
 
 Subject: Re: Mackie Onyx Firewire
 To: 
 ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.comhttp://mc/compose?to=ubuntu-studio-us...@lists.ubuntu.com
 Message-ID: 
 20100105225859.ga2...@strigy.yelavich.homehttp://mc/compose?to=20100105225859.ga2...@strigy.yelavich.home
 
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:25:36AM EST, Michael Sullivan wrote:
  Hi all
 
  I recently purchased the Mackie Onyx Firewire option for my Onyx
  Mixer.   I am running AMD64 Ubuntu Studio 8.04.  I got the sound working
  fine with jack, but only using Jack.That is to say, if I go to
  Youtube or some site with embedded audio / video I don't have sound.
 
  My previous setup was a M-audio delta 66.  I had no problem using that
  on web sites.
 
  Am I missing something or does the Onyx only work using jack?

 Only jack supports firewire audio devices at this time. In order to get
 sound via the firewire device from youtube etc, you would need to set up
 alsa using apps to go via the alsa - jack plugin.

 Luke



 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Not music, but Ubuntu Studio and Inkscape

2010-01-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tommy Hjalmarsson tomm...@bredband.netwrote:

 WB wrote:
  Hey, that's pretty awesome!
 
  What kind of workflow does an image like that have?  Was that done
  start-to-finish in Linux?  I'm very impressed.
 
  - Dave H
  /Warrior Bob
 
 
  On Jan 5, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Tommy Hjalmarsson wrote:
 
  My latest InkScape image:
  http://zombiwoof.deviantart.com/art/Frog-149323068
 
 
 Yes, it's all done in Ubuntu Studio Inkscape.  A improvisation with no
 goal. My roots is as a tecnical illustrator, on paper (ink) and computer
 (Unix/Tech Illustrator).
 I did this image to check if my old knowledge to build up perspective
 was easy to use in Inkscape.

 The begining:
 http://tinyurl.se/qop3e1
 later:
 http://tinyurl.se/fh4r2r
 later:
 http://tinyurl.se/cdya6i

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


I was going to suggest you should submit that (or any other similar open
artwork) to the Ubuntu Free Culture Showcase:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFreeCultureShowcase but then I realized that
you've copyrighted it with all rights reserved.

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks

2010-01-01 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, teza tsalio...@orange.fr wrote:

 Hi all, fiew times ago we where talking about having Raccarack in the
 next Ubuntu Studio Lucid instead Creox which is a very good idea. But
 there'sanother soft  build by Sandie Sandgreen, Ubuntu Audio
 Tweaks who will be great to have in the next issue.
 You can test the soft here
 http://www.sandgreen.dk/index.php?side=python_uat
 Tell us what you think about.
 Amts
 Teza.


Requests like this should probably be made first on the devel mailing list.
Since there's no package for that application currently in the repositories,
then inclusion would be much more time consuming.

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Reminder: Monthly Ubuntu Studio Development Team Meeting

2009-12-31 Thread Eric Hedekar
Hi Everyone,

Hope you all had a wonderful holiday.  This is a reminder that in 11 days
(Jan 10th) we have our next monthly Ubuntu Studio development team meeting.
As always, it will take place in #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net at
7:00pm (19:00) UTC and the agenda can be read/edited/defaced at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jan10
We encourage all those interested in Ubuntu Studio's growth to attend (even
just to passively read).
For further meeting info take a look at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings
Thanks for your time, and have a happy new year!

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Dssi-Vst and Ubuntu Studio

2009-12-09 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:17 AM, sandie san...@sandgreen.dk wrote:

 Sergio Bello wrote:
  I don't know about lmms VsTIge, but probably it's a reimplementation
  from scratch of the Steimberg api, something like Linux reimplementation
  of posix api...
 
 
 So this is legal ?
 If it is... then why don't we make a native linux VST for things like
 Ardour, and by we I mean someone else than me, preferable one who
 actualy know what he/she is doing ;-)

 Sandie


Well, yes vestiege is legal - but I'm no lawyer and I'm sure it depends on
what country you're in and how much you pay the lawyer who argues your case.

As for why we don't make a native linux VST for things like Ardour?  There
exists the Vestiege headers for VST support in Ardour, and Ardour also has
LV2 support (sort of LADSPA catching up to VST's features) so, in my
opinion, it's a question of why duplicate that which already exists.  Ardour
will be compiled with LV2 support for the upcoming Lucid Lynx release, but
no plans have been made to get it compiled with Vestiege headers, yet.

DSSI-VST, FST, JOST, and other similar technologies all relied on the
compiler going to the Steinberg website, signing up for a VST developer
account that includes an agreement not to redistribute the headers,
downloading the headers, then compiling.  This does not work for
distributions - VST (similar to other closed-sourced software) is faulty
technology.

I am really excited for the inclusion of the LV2 libraries in Lucid Lynx.
Let the LV2 plugin excitement/growth/development BEGIN

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


[Bug 494368] [NEW] Upgrade Flowcanvas to latest 0.6.0 release

2009-12-09 Thread Eric Hedekar
Public bug reported:

Just yesterday the 0.6.0 release of Flowcanvas was made.  Please upgrade
the current package.

** Affects: flowcanvas (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Upgrade Flowcanvas to latest 0.6.0 release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 494365] [NEW] Upgrade Raul to latest 0.6.0 release

2009-12-09 Thread Eric Hedekar
Public bug reported:

Just yesterday the latest 0.6.0 Raul release was made.  Please upgrade
the current package.

** Affects: raul (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Upgrade Raul to latest 0.6.0 release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494365
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 494368] Re: Upgrade Flowcanvas to latest 0.6.0 release

2009-12-09 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Description changed:

  Just yesterday the 0.6.0 release of Flowcanvas was made.  Please upgrade
  the current package.
+ 
+ Changelog from the 0.6.0 release:
+   * Switch to waf build system
+   * Fix compilation with GCC 4.4
+   * Make Canvas::scroll_to_center() public
+   * Add item entered/left signals
+   * Add vertical flow layout w/o port labels (pd style)
+   * Fix some stuck cursor grab issues
+   * Slightly more sophisticated port and module sizing
+   * Resize performance improvements

-- 
Upgrade Flowcanvas to latest 0.6.0 release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 494365] Re: Upgrade Raul to latest 0.6.0 release

2009-12-09 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Description changed:

  Just yesterday the latest 0.6.0 Raul release was made.  Please upgrade
  the current package.
+ 
+ Changelog from the 0.6.0 release:
+   * Switch to waf build system
+   * Fix compilation with GCC 4.4
+   * Add URI class and make Path a special URI (with scheme path:)
+   * Remove JackDriver
+   * Add NullDeleter convenience for SharedPtr
+   * Add URI Atom type
+   * Add C++ style printing for Atom
+   * Fix type wackiness for glib atomic functions on PPC
+   * Remove misguided LASH stuff
+   * Depend on glib (instead of glibmm)

-- 
Upgrade Raul to latest 0.6.0 release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494365
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Dec13 Developer Meeting Reminder

2009-12-08 Thread Eric Hedekar
This is just a friendly reminder that the monthly (non-mandatory) Ubuntu
Studio Developer meeting is five days away.  It will be held at 19:00 UTC on
Sunday Dec 13th in #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net and will follow the
agenda at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Dec13

For those not already planning to attend, you may want to sit in and listen,
or check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/ for minutes and
plans for the next (and previous) meetings.

Anyone with any interest in helping the development of Ubuntu Studio is
encouraged to attend, and bookmark
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/
Thanks.

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: List of Ubuntu Studio packages for making a live DVD ?

2009-12-07 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:47 AM, laurent.bellegarde 
laurent.bellega...@free.fr wrote:

 Hi all.

 With another team, lprod.org team have created a live DVD of Ubuntu
 Studio Karmic 32 bits (we can create also a 64 bits example).
 I've tested it this morning on a laptop with only windows XP pro on the
 hard disk. It's working perfectly.

 It could be nice to have this iso available for everyone, but we have a
 trouble.

 The guy who has created the live DVD has done a great job, but has
 introduced severals packages which are very important for video editing
 but cause some trouble of licence, as ffmpeg, mencoder, mplayer. So this
 DVD is very powerfull because you can edit video in live which is very
 impressive, but illegal in severals countries. I'm gonna complete my
 tests, ardour is also compiled with VST support, and many non free
 improvement are live available.

 So where can i found the complete official list of ALL the packages free
 included in the Ubuntu Studio karmic official DVD install disk to
 compare to our beta disk, to create a new one as the official one but
 live, without all forbidden packages  to allow everyone to download it ?

 Is it allowed to create it ?

 If not, we can create a lprod.org one, based only on free software
 included in Ubuntu Studio, in live and downloadable.

 Thank's for answers.

 Laurent,
 lprod.org

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 ubuntu-studio-us...@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Hi Laurent,

This is wonderful news, this is a feature request that we get on a regular
basis from our users but the dev team is not experienced in the creation of
LiveDVDs.  It'd be great if this effort could be moved into the Ubuntu
Studio development process so that future releases have live capabilities.
I'm CCing the dev list on this and I hope that the discussion continues
there.  Please consider joining that list to facilitate the discussion
there.

To answer your question regarding packages, the full list of packages
(including dependencies) can be seen at
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=defaultsection=allarch=anysearchon=nameskeywords=ubuntustudio

- Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

2009-12-07 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 235693] Re: [needs-packaging] raul-0.4.0

2009-12-07 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
[needs-packaging] raul-0.4.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492830] Re: flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4

2009-12-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
I discussed this with upstream and they claim a fix for that was
committed to svn ages ago and furthermore, that he'll do a release
very soon to fix this.  I'm happy to update the package when that
occurs (and/or write a patch should the new release take too long).

** Changed in: flowcanvas (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Eric Hedekar (stochastic)

-- 
flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492962] [NEW] Raul fails to build from source with gcc4.4

2009-12-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
Public bug reported:

As can be seen here: 
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36473766/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.raul_0.5.1-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
Raul fails to build, with this error as an output:

 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../config -I/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1 
-I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include 
-I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -ansi -pipe -fmessage-length=999 
-DCONFIG_H_PATH=\/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1/config/config.h\ -c SMFReader.cpp  
-fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libraul_la-SMFReader.o
SMFReader.cpp: In member function 'bool Raul::SMFReader::open(const 
std::string)':
SMFReader.cpp:107: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, 
size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
SMFReader.cpp:118: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, 
size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
SMFReader.cpp:123: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, 
size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
SMFReader.cpp:128: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, 
size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
SMFReader.cpp: In member function 'bool Raul::SMFReader::seek_to_track(unsigned 
int)':
SMFReader.cpp:164: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, 
size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
SMFReader.cpp:173: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, 
size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
SMFReader.cpp: In member function 'int Raul::SMFReader::read_event(size_t, 
uint8_t*, uint32_t*, uint32_t*)':
SMFReader.cpp:278: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, 
size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. 
-I../config-I/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1 -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 
-I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -ansi -pipe 
-fmessage-length=999 
-DCONFIG_H_PATH=\/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1/config/config.h\ -c -o 
libraul_la-SMFWriter.lo `test -f 'SMFWriter.cpp' || echo './'`SMFWriter.cpp
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../config -I/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1 
-I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include 
-I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -ansi -pipe -fmessage-length=999 
-DCONFIG_H_PATH=\/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1/config/config.h\ -c SMFWriter.cpp  
-fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libraul_la-SMFWriter.o
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'bool Raul::SMFWriter::start(const 
std::string, Raul::TimeStamp)':
SMFWriter.cpp:72: error: 'fopen' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'virtual void 
Raul::SMFWriter::write_event(Raul::TimeStamp, size_t, const unsigned char*)':
SMFWriter.cpp:108: error: 'fseek' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp:120: error: 'fwrite' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp:127: error: 'fwrite' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'void Raul::SMFWriter::flush()':
SMFWriter.cpp:138: error: 'fflush' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'void Raul::SMFWriter::finish()':
SMFWriter.cpp:149: error: 'fclose' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'void Raul::SMFWriter::write_header()':
SMFWriter.cpp:172: error: 'freopen' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp:174: error: 'fseek' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'void Raul::SMFWriter::write_footer()':
SMFWriter.cpp:185: error: 'fseek' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp:188: error: 'fwrite' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'void 
Raul::SMFWriter::write_chunk_header(const char*, uint32_t)':
SMFWriter.cpp:197: error: 'fwrite' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'void Raul::SMFWriter::write_chunk(const 
char*, uint32_t, void*)':
SMFWriter.cpp:207: error: 'fwrite' was not declared in this scope
SMFWriter.cpp: In member function 'size_t 
Raul::SMFWriter::write_var_len(uint32_t)':
SMFWriter.cpp:230: error: 'fputc' was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [libraul_la-SMFWriter.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/raul-0.5.1'
dh_auto_build: make returned exit code 2
make: *** [build] Error 1

** Affects: raul (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Raul fails to build from source with 

[Bug 235696] Re: [upgrade] upgrade to 0.4.2

2009-12-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: patchage (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Eric Hedekar (stochastic)

** Changed in: patchage
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Eric Hedekar (stochastic)

** Changed in: patchage
 Assignee: Eric Hedekar (stochastic) = (unassigned)

-- 
[upgrade] upgrade to 0.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235696
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 235693] Re: [needs-packaging] raul-0.4.0

2009-12-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

-- 
[needs-packaging] raul-0.4.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492830] [NEW] flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4

2009-12-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
Public bug reported:

as can be seen here: 
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36472094/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.flowcanvas_0.5.1-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
the following error is produced when building flowcanvas on gcc4.4
In file included from /build/buildd/flowcanvas-0.5.1/flowcanvas/Canvas.hpp:25,
 from Canvas.cpp:27:
/build/buildd/flowcanvas-0.5.1/flowcanvas/Connection.hpp:43: error: 'uint32_t' 
has not been declared
/build/buildd/flowcanvas-0.5.1/flowcanvas/Connection.hpp:61: error: 'uint32_t' 
has not been declared
/build/buildd/flowcanvas-0.5.1/flowcanvas/Connection.hpp:86: error: 'uint32_t' 
does not name a type
make[2]: *** [Canvas.lo] Error 1

** Affects: flowcanvas (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Ubuntu-Studio-users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 1

2009-12-03 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Brian David beej...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Susan Cragin susancra...@earthlink.netwrote:

 Brian King kirjoitti:
 
  ubuntu's efforts to get rt kernel working in realtime mode just isn't
  there yet :-( ubuntu just hasn't got the right mix for maximum
  desktop performance and rt yet :-(
 
 Well, RT-kernel works me... maybe it is just me ;-)

 RT works for me much better, much faster, than generic kernel, and I even
 run one sound app through wine.
 If Mr. King wants to test another kernel, maybe he should try bfsbfq,
 which is crazy-fast but runs best on a lightly-configured desktop (best with
 only one app running at a time) and has peculiar bottlenecks. (Backup
 first.)
 Actually, to the extent there is a difference between real-time and just
 fast, bfsbfq is just fast. It gallops in some places, seems to trot in
 others. My opinion? bfsbfq will be great a year from now to run just one
 sound application at a time on a low-powered machine. Probably best with
 Lubuntu, if that ever gets started.
 Susan


 I agree to a certain extent with Brian King's point.  I'm really enjoying
 Ubuntu Studio Karmic and it is very stable and fast for me, but it took some
 tweaking to get it running well.  And by tweaking, I don't mean adjusting
 settings in a GUI or downloading software, I mean using the command-line to
 change thread priorities.  That is a type of hurtle that the vast majority
 of potential new users are not going to care to get over.  It is also
 something that can generally be said of pretty much any Linux distro:  with
 enough tweaking it will do what you want.

 Ubuntu Studio is not just any distro, it is a specialized one.  And for it
 to be considered successful, at least for me, means that it can be used
 out-of-the-box (or at least with minimal and easy adjusting) by people more
 focused on multimedia production than on how a Linux system works.  Ubuntu
 Studio gets closer to that with every release, and I have high hopes for the
 future of the distro, but I agree that it just isn't there yet.

 Speaking of Lubuntu, has the Ubuntu Studio team ever considered switching
 to a more lightweight desktop, such as XFCE or LXDE?  I think that would be
 a great idea, but I have no idea what it would take.
 --
 -Brian David


It should be noted that these tweaks are generally ones that audio users
require, and that Ubuntu Studio is an Audio, Video, and Graphics
distribution.  Yes, Karmic's RT kernel is more stable than others, but it's
not infallible, and yes, the Ubuntu Studio Controls application is falling
to bits with serious bugs (not setting the things it should be setting,
putting settings in places where they will be overwritten on the next
update, and relying on a gui framework that is disappearing upstream
etc...).  However, the current dev team is stretched very thin - we are
constantly encouraging community members to step up and learn how to chip in
more (if you're not sure how, just e-mail me directly - or the dev list).
Infact if anyone with drive and a little bit of python knowledge wants to
help fix Ubuntu Studio Controls to get these tweaks sorted out better,
please contact us!  You'd also be surprised how a few volunteers taking care
of basic/easy tasks can help alleviate the burnout level of the rest of the
dev team.
(Brian David, incase it's not obvious, I'm kinda pushing you here - politely
and kindly - to step up.  You seem like you're familiar enough with the
command line and some organizational features of the distro, with an eye
toward user-ease, that you could easily help, or learn to help in your spare
time.  Hopefully you'll consider my obvious hint.  Thanks.)

As for the lighter weight desktop, it would be way too much work for the
current body of Ubuntu Studio devs to tackle on their own.  It might be
feasible to transition from an Ubuntu base to a Xbuntu base, but that would
be a huge change of direction for the distribution and could potentially
cause major issues.  This is however, a community-built operating system so
if the community wants a feature/design/tweak enough, the devs will not only
listen, but encourage people to help build it with them.

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


[Bug 183114] Re: [needs-packaging] LV2 library and plugin

2009-12-03 Thread Eric Hedekar
Marking this catch-all bug as Fix Released because there is now lv2core
3.0, slv2, invada plugins, and lv2dynparam all in the Lucid
repositories.  The essence of this bug is a request for lv2 libraries
and plugins (both of which now exist in Lucid).  Other programs are
mentioned here, but separate needs-packaging bugs should be filed on
those.

** Changed in: ubuntustudio
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
[needs-packaging] LV2 library and plugin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 221954] Re: Gcdmaster is not in the right place once ubuntustudio-menu is installed

2009-12-01 Thread Eric Hedekar
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

-- 
Gcdmaster is not in the right place once ubuntustudio-menu is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221954
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: DVD problems

2009-11-27 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Tom Rausner t...@rausner.dk wrote:

 Hi

 fre, 27 11 2009 kl. 13:44 -0700, skrev tkwa...@gmail.com:

  Vlc media player... Works for everything.

 No, it don't... at least not on my laptop.


I recall that I had to set my computer's region code  before some DVDs would
play.  Here's how:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats/PlayingDVDs#Setting%20DVD%20Region%20Codes

Hope that helps.

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Scheduling the next monthly meeting time

2009-11-26 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:08:21AM EST, Eric Hedekar wrote:
  Hey everyone,
 
  So last month we had started to discuss a change to the monthly meeting
  time.  After further discussions on IRC I think Sundays at 7pm (19:00)
 UTC
  would likely be a good time for most.  Does anyone have a major conflict
  with this?  Luke I realize this is 6am on monday for you, is that too
  early?  We were running this on the second monday of every month, so
 should
  we continue on the second sunday of every month now?  That would place
 the
  next meeting on December 13th at 7pm UTC.  Luke are you back from your
  vacation by then?  Please voice your opinions on this.

 I'll be back by then, and I am happy to do that time once every 2 weeks.


Just to clarify, it'd be the second sunday of every month, so once every 4
weeks (roughly).

-Eric
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Replace Creox with Rakarrack?

2009-11-23 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote:

 I would like to suggest we replace Creox effects processor with Rakarrack
 for Lucid.

 Creox [1] does not appear to be updated or maintained as the version
 (0.2.2rc2) that is currently in Ubuntu Studio [2] (and Debian [3]) was
 released in 2003.

 Rakarrack [4], in contrast, released three new versions last year [5] and
 even has a developers blog [6] that shows activity for this year.

 Although Rakarrack isn't currently in the Ubuntu repositories, Debian shows
 packaging for Rakarrack for both Sid and Squeeze [6] so hopefully we can
 sync easily enough.

 Dave Phillips even reviewed it in one of his Linux Journal articles [7].

 The next prudent steps would be to mail the Ubuntu Studio users mail list,
 post at Ubuntu Forums and even mail to developer to ask if updates can be
 expected.  If no one violently objects to persuing Rakarrack I will take
 previously outlined steps.

 Scott

 [1] http://zyzstar.kosoru.com/?creox
 [2] http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=creox
 [3] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=creox
 [4] http://rakarrack.sourceforge.net/
 [5] http://sourceforge.net/projects/rakarrack/files/
 [6] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=rakarrack
 [7] http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/rakarrack-guitar-fx-linux

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


+1 for me.  I think the only reason why we haven't shipped rackarrack was
the lack of package.  If it's synced from debian, then all is good.
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Failed at Select and Install Software

2009-11-17 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, beej...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Nov 17, 2009 8:27am, mr arwin arwin...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello, I check list all the software for Ubuntu Studio but when in
 
  progress until 80% It stopped (failed). I boot it via USB.
 
 
 
  So, what I should do to fix it?
 
  Can I install them via pool folder? How?
 
 
 
  Thanks.
 
 

 The first thing I'd ask is if you are connected to the internet via a land
 line while you install. My experience is that you are asking for trouble if
 you install Ubuntu Studio without being connected to the internet. In
 particular, I think Karmic will not be able to install MS Core Fonts without
 an active connection and will give you this error.

 If you don't care to do a fresh install, you should be able to re-install
 the Ubuntu Studio meta-packages (ubuntustudio-graphics, ubuntustudio-video,
 whatever the fonts package is called, etc) in Synaptic to get the software
 that you're missing. This is assuming the core system and GNOME have been
 installed correctly.


Karmic actually needs to be connected to the internet for the
ubuntustudio-audio package to install properly.  The other packages should
install just fine without the internet. This is because of the
ttf-mscorefonts-installer package that lmms-vst indirectly requires.  For
info on this, including workaround methods, please read this post
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8264172#post8264172

-Eric Hedekar
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


[Bug 383999] Re: no JACK support

2009-11-15 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Summary changed:

- no JACK support
+ no JACK support in Bristol

-- 
no JACK support in Bristol
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383999
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 374101] Re: Brasero hangs at Normalizing tracks

2009-11-12 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Running a fully up to date Karmic and my Brasero hung at 'Normalizing
tracks' for over an hour.  I didn't research the cause, but it looks
like this bug is NOT fixed.  Can anyone on Karmic confirm this?

-- 
Brasero hangs at Normalizing tracks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286621] Re: [dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor'

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Luke I notice this was supposed to be added for jaunty but it's yet to
be added to the ubuntustudio-video meta.  Is there any reason beyond
forgetting?  I'll happily make the change as I feel this program is very
useful for the independent video artist.

-- 
[dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 246894] Re: [needs packaging] FFADO FreeBob - Firewire Mixer Audio Drivers

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Since neither Feisty nor Gutsy are supported archives, I'm switching
this bug to invalid for those backport request (effectively archiving
this bug).

** Changed in: feisty-backports
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

** Changed in: gutsy-backports
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
[needs packaging] FFADO  FreeBob - Firewire Mixer Audio Drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246894
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 221954] Re: Gcdmaster is not in the right place once ubuntustudio-menu is installed

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Studio-dev (ubuntustudio-dev) = Eric Hedekar 
(stochastic) (stochastic)

-- 
Gcdmaster is not in the right place once ubuntustudio-menu is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221954
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 480988] [NEW] Blender is not listed when searching for a video editor

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: software-center

When doing a search for 'video editor' in Ubuntu Software Center, one of
the most (if not the most) powerful and stable video editors in Ubuntu
does not appear.

Please add 'video editor' as a tag for the Blender package in the
Software Center.

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Blender is not listed as a video editor when searching for a video editor
+ Blender is not listed when searching for a video editor

-- 
Blender is not listed when searching for a video editor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286621] Re: [dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor'

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
subtitleeditor is now in the Lucid ubuntustudio-video meta.

** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
[dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 246894] Re: [needs packaging] FFADO FreeBob - Firewire Mixer Audio Drivers

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Since neither Feisty nor Gutsy are supported archives, I'm switching
this bug to invalid for those backport request (effectively archiving
this bug).

** Changed in: feisty-backports
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

** Changed in: gutsy-backports
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
[needs packaging] FFADO  FreeBob - Firewire Mixer Audio Drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246894
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports.

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


  1   2   3   >