Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in?Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Joao Pinto
> If the situation were that he was asking for help with a specific package,
>  then I would agree.
>
> Scott K
>
> --
> Ubuntu-motu mailing list
> Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
>

We are all free to have opinions as long we don't try to push them as facts.
Fact 1: someone asked for help how to become a MOTU and present interest for
a particular Qt package
Fact 2: someone else based on a QT package mention suggested additional
resources related to that interest

>From the logs you have sent there is no objective statement leading the
"#ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel" idea, it is your opinion based on the
chat interpretation, which in my opinion is not correct.

Best regards,
-- 
João Luís Marques Pinto
GetDeb Team Leader
http://www.getdeb.net
http://blog.getdeb.net
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in?Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Christopher Swift
Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 18:47 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman: 
> 
> "Christopher Swift"  wrote:
> 
> >Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 17:24 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman: 
> >> I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go 
> >> elsewhere if they express an interest in a KDE/Qt packages. 
> >> 
> >> I disagree.  
> >> 
> >> Scott K
> >> 
> >Scott,  in this conversation from what I have read in the thread all
> >that has happened is that the guy asking for help,  shadeslayer,  was
> >advised to hang out in #kubuntu-devel since that is the location where
> >people who can assist with KDE-related technical matters in Ubuntu are
> >most likely to be found in one place.  The MOTU team is a great team for
> >assistance in packaging but if a specific KDE-related error popped up
> >then hanging out in both #kubuntu-devel & #ubuntu-motu would allow that
> >developer to get help and fix the problem much more easier since there
> >is a great pool of assistance to choose from.
> >
> >In my humble opinion,  there is absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with
> >recommending a developer/contributor to be in two related channels which
> >focus on two different aspects on which they will need to combine to do
> >their task most efficiently.  This is a big case of something out of
> >nothing.
> >
> You're welcome to you're opinion. The problem is it's unrelated to what 
> happened. He didn't ask for help with Qt packaging. He asked for help 
> becoming a MOTU. 
> 
> If the situation were that he was asking for help with a specific package,  
> then I would agree. 
> 
> Scott K
> 
In this instance,  fabrice_sp was simply suggesting that connecting to
other K* channels would help him out overall.  He didn't say,  "well to
join the MOTU it is best off that you head to #kubuntu-*" but rather "if
you hang out in #kubuntu-* you may also pick up some other tips".  In
the -motu channel itself he tried to link him to the /MOTU/Mentoring
page on the wiki however the other contributor beat him to it.  I can't
really see what happened next after the message at 15:29:16 to see how
that developed.

Christopher Swift
-- 
Christopher Swift 


-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in?Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Scott Kitterman


"Christopher Swift"  wrote:

>Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 17:24 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman: 
>> I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go 
>> elsewhere if they express an interest in a KDE/Qt packages. 
>> 
>> I disagree.  
>> 
>> Scott K
>> 
>Scott,  in this conversation from what I have read in the thread all
>that has happened is that the guy asking for help,  shadeslayer,  was
>advised to hang out in #kubuntu-devel since that is the location where
>people who can assist with KDE-related technical matters in Ubuntu are
>most likely to be found in one place.  The MOTU team is a great team for
>assistance in packaging but if a specific KDE-related error popped up
>then hanging out in both #kubuntu-devel & #ubuntu-motu would allow that
>developer to get help and fix the problem much more easier since there
>is a great pool of assistance to choose from.
>
>In my humble opinion,  there is absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with
>recommending a developer/contributor to be in two related channels which
>focus on two different aspects on which they will need to combine to do
>their task most efficiently.  This is a big case of something out of
>nothing.
>
You're welcome to you're opinion. The problem is it's unrelated to what 
happened. He didn't ask for help with Qt packaging. He asked for help becoming 
a MOTU. 

If the situation were that he was asking for help with a specific package,  
then I would agree. 

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in?Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Christopher Swift
Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 17:24 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman: 
> I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go 
> elsewhere if they express an interest in a KDE/Qt packages. 
> 
> I disagree.  
> 
> Scott K
> 
Scott,  in this conversation from what I have read in the thread all
that has happened is that the guy asking for help,  shadeslayer,  was
advised to hang out in #kubuntu-devel since that is the location where
people who can assist with KDE-related technical matters in Ubuntu are
most likely to be found in one place.  The MOTU team is a great team for
assistance in packaging but if a specific KDE-related error popped up
then hanging out in both #kubuntu-devel & #ubuntu-motu would allow that
developer to get help and fix the problem much more easier since there
is a great pool of assistance to choose from.

In my humble opinion,  there is absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with
recommending a developer/contributor to be in two related channels which
focus on two different aspects on which they will need to combine to do
their task most efficiently.  This is a big case of something out of
nothing.


Regards,
Christopher Swift.
-- 
Christopher Swift 


-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in?Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Scott Kitterman


"Soren Hansen"  wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> The conversation didn't start with "help me with this package". It
>> started with "I want to be a MOTU".
>
>True.
>
>> My read is someone who said they wanted to become a MOTU was sent away
>> and that's not very Ubuntu. #kubuntu-devel is not the best channel for
>> people that want to be MOTU.
>
>That depends. If said person is mostly/only interested in KDE stuff, it
>sounds (based on the name, I've never been there) like the best place
>place to get guidance on that subject, and only a few e-mails ago you
>becried the fact that people working on KDE had their MOTU application
>rejected. If you believe working on Kubuntu should be a valid path to
>becoming a MOTU, what's wrong with working more directly with the
>Kubuntu developers in #kubuntu-devel as your way towards MOTU?
>
>Again, I have to stress that noone was thrown out of #ubuntu-motu. A
>more focused forum was simply pointed out.
>
I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go 
elsewhere if they express an interest in a KDE/Qt packages. 

I disagree.  

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in?Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Soren Hansen
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The conversation didn't start with "help me with this package". It
> started with "I want to be a MOTU".

True.

> My read is someone who said they wanted to become a MOTU was sent away
> and that's not very Ubuntu. #kubuntu-devel is not the best channel for
> people that want to be MOTU.

That depends. If said person is mostly/only interested in KDE stuff, it
sounds (based on the name, I've never been there) like the best place
place to get guidance on that subject, and only a few e-mails ago you
becried the fact that people working on KDE had their MOTU application
rejected. If you believe working on Kubuntu should be a valid path to
becoming a MOTU, what's wrong with working more directly with the
Kubuntu developers in #kubuntu-devel as your way towards MOTU?

Again, I have to stress that noone was thrown out of #ubuntu-motu. A
more focused forum was simply pointed out.

-- 
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Developer
http://www.ubuntu.com/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in?Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Steve Beattie
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The conversation didn't start with "help me with this package". It
> started with "I want to be a MOTU".
>
> My read is someone who said they wanted to become a MOTU was sent away
> and that's not very Ubuntu. #kubuntu-devel is not the best channel
> for people that want to be MOTU.

No, but it *is* a place for someone who wants to work on Qt/KDE
packaging to coordinate their efforts with people who are also
focused on Qt/KDE packaging. I didn't read it as "please leave
#ubuntu-motu" but rather, "here's a suggested place to go (in addition
to #ubuntu-motu) to get in contact with people who have more knowledge
of the specific idioms of the package you're looking at", but perhaps
I'm extending the benefit of the doubt too generously.

I would hope that we encourage MOTU members to coordinate their efforts
in specific areas with people who are already working in those areas.

-- 
Steve Beattie

http://NxNW.org/~steve/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Soren Hansen
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:10:53AM -0400, ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> Today in my backscroll I see:
>>> 
>>> [15:13:58]  shadeslayer, what do you want?
>>[...]
>>> [15:29:16]  fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by
>>> maco in #kubuntu-devel :P
>>Sorry, maybe I'm being dense, but which part exactly is offensive?
> The part where someone is told because the package name starts with q,
> #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel.

I'm terribly sorry, but I don't see it. It's not that I don't understand
or acknowledge the problem, I just don't see the problem manifested in
the original conversation. Surely, it can't just be this:

[15:28:46]  if you are more interested in K packages, you
could connect to kubuntu channels

is it?

If it is, let me offer a different perspective: I see Fabrice providing
a friendly pointer to a forum where the other party might get more
qualified, focused help by simply pointing out that this other forum
exists.  Nothing more.  He's not telling anyone to go away, that they're
off-topic, that they're not welcome, or that they're acting
inappropriately.

If people want to talk about working on server stuff, it's much more
likely to catch my attention in #ubuntu-server, or if someone wants to
work on virtualisation stuff, I'm much more likely to notice it in
#ubuntu-virt, but if I should happen to see anyone ask about it in
#ubuntu-motu, I'm happy to help them there as well. These other channels
/do/ exist. Are /you/ saying people are not welcome /there/?

I'll readily admit I haven't looked up the conversation in my logs, so
there may be more context, but given the part you quoted, I really don't
see the problem. Sorry.

> This may seem over sensitive to you,  but recently someone was turned
> down for MOTU because they work on KDE packages and this sort of
> pushing away people focused on one part of Universe only reinforces
> the problem.

This is not isolated to people working on KDE stuff. With the advent of
more and more package sets, people are more likely to get granted upload
privs to those rather than getting full MOTU or core-dev, since (at
least I'm reasonably sure this is the case) being interested in working
on a limited set of more or less related packages is more common than
being interested in working on all sorts of completely random stuff.

-- 
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Developer
http://www.ubuntu.com/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Soren Hansen
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:44:01AM -0400, Ralph Janke wrote:
> The issue is not that any term that was used is offensive, it
> is deeper subtlety that needs to be addressed.

I wasn't using "offensive" in the sense of "profane", but more in the
sense of "problematic."

> As Scott has said, we had discussions about that before and at the UDS
> to the point that there was the question if there should be a second
> "MOTU" group for the KDE packages in universe.

Understood, Scott gave a summary in his original e-mail.

> So please let's be mindful, that we are one big family and that we are
> all following the same goal. We support each other, we are inclusive,
> not exclusive!

I'm not trying to argue against inclusiveness and cooperation. I just
don't understand which part of what was said in the conversation
compelled Scott to write an e-mail about it.

-- 
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Developer
http://www.ubuntu.com/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ub untu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Scott Kitterman


"Fabrice Coutadeur"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>2010/6/16 James Westby :
>> That's not how I read it. They were told that if they were intereted in
>> KDE packages they could hang around in the Kubuntu channels.
>
>And that's exactly what I meant with my comment.
>
>> I agree that telling someone they were in the wrong place would be
>> wrong, but if there are separate Kubuntu channels then I see nothing
>
>Totally agree on that!
>
The conversation didn't start with "help me with this package". It started with 
"I want to be a MOTU".

My read is someone who said they wanted to become a MOTU was sent away and 
that's not very Ubuntu. #kubuntu-devel is not the best channel for people that 
want to be MOTU. 

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Fabrice Coutadeur
Hi,

2010/6/16 James Westby :
> That's not how I read it. They were told that if they were intereted in
> KDE packages they could hang around in the Kubuntu channels.

And that's exactly what I meant with my comment.

> I agree that telling someone they were in the wrong place would be
> wrong, but if there are separate Kubuntu channels then I see nothing

Totally agree on that!

Cheers,

Fabrice

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread James Westby
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:10:53 -0400, "ubu...@kitterman.com" 
 wrote:
> The part where someone is told because the package name starts with q,
> #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel. The person doing the asking is in
> fact very active in #kubuntu-devel, but was reaching out to MOTU to
> try and broaden themselves when they got sent away. 

That's not how I read it. They were told that if they were intereted in
KDE packages they could hang around in the Kubuntu channels.

I agree that telling someone they were in the wrong place would be
wrong, but if there are separate Kubuntu channels then I see nothing
wrong with making sure that people interested in KDE know they exist.

Thanks,

James

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Daniel Holbach
On 16.06.2010 16:10, ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
> The part where someone is told because the package name starts with q, 
> #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel. The person doing the asking is in fact 
> very active in #kubuntu-devel, but was reaching out to MOTU to try and 
> broaden themselves when they got sent away. 
> 
> This may seem over sensitive to you,  but recently someone was turned down 
> for MOTU because they work on KDE packages and this sort of pushing away 
> people focused on one part of Universe only reinforces the problem. 

I think we need to get better at not thinking in too small categories.
It's probably fine to say "If you can't find the experience that you're
looking for in here, you might want to talk to the people in #XYZ" -
it's what I'd do if it was about something specific as server packaging
or the GNOME desktop or whatever.

We can probably be more careful to avoid giving people the feeling
"they're wrong here".

Have a great day,
 Daniel

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Steven Harms
I think you are mislead by the term "Masters of the Universe".  At no
point is everyone in #ubuntu-motu a domain specific expert on every
facet of every type of package.  For expert advice, you probably want
to join channels dedicated to that subject.

I see MOTU as a channel for general questions and questions regarding
generic packaging and preferences, and specific channels for detailed
oriented.  I don't think anyone says you can't ask on both forums, nor
kicked anyone from the channel.

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:10 AM, ubu...@kitterman.com
 wrote:
>
>
> "Soren Hansen"  wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> Today in my backscroll I see:
>>>
>>> [15:13:58]  shadeslayer, what do you want?
>>[...]
>>> [15:29:16]  fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by maco in
>>> #kubuntu-devel :P
>>>
>>> This is completely inappropriate. Let me know when #ubuntu-motu is open for
>>> everyone in the Ubuntu community.
>>
>>Sorry, maybe I'm being dense, but which part exactly is offensive?
>
> The part where someone is told because the package name starts with q, 
> #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel. The person doing the asking is in fact 
> very active in #kubuntu-devel, but was reaching out to MOTU to try and 
> broaden themselves when they got sent away.
>
> This may seem over sensitive to you,  but recently someone was turned down 
> for MOTU because they work on KDE packages and this sort of pushing away 
> people focused on one part of Universe only reinforces the problem.
>
> Scott K
>
> --
> Ubuntu-motu mailing list
> Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
>



-- 
GPG Key ID: C92EF367 / 1428 FE8E 1E07 DDA8 EFD7 195F DCCD F5B3 C92E F367

WWW: http://www.sharms.org/blog

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread ubu...@kitterman.com


"Soren Hansen"  wrote:

>On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Today in my backscroll I see:
>> 
>> [15:13:58]  shadeslayer, what do you want?
>[...]
>> [15:29:16]  fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by maco in 
>> #kubuntu-devel :P
>> 
>> This is completely inappropriate. Let me know when #ubuntu-motu is open for 
>> everyone in the Ubuntu community.
>
>Sorry, maybe I'm being dense, but which part exactly is offensive?

The part where someone is told because the package name starts with q, 
#ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel. The person doing the asking is in fact very 
active in #kubuntu-devel, but was reaching out to MOTU to try and broaden 
themselves when they got sent away. 

This may seem over sensitive to you,  but recently someone was turned down for 
MOTU because they work on KDE packages and this sort of pushing away people 
focused on one part of Universe only reinforces the problem. 

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Ralph Janke
The issue is not that any term that was used is offensive, it
is deeper subtlety that needs to be addressed.

As Scott has said, we had discussions about that before
and at the UDS to the point that there was the question
if there should be a second "MOTU" group for the KDE
packages in universe.

However, we have decided, and I believe correctly, that
this would not be the ideal outcome and hence there
should not be a distinction between people working
on KDE packages and other people.

I have also never heard anybody in the motu channel or
the motu ML that someone working mostly on Gnome
packages should go to a special Gnome channel when
they asked for mentorship to be a MOTU.

Let remember what we stand for in Ubuntu. Respect and
diversity. We are all working on a diverse set of packages.
In some areas it makes sense that certain groups focus on
a certain set of packages, however, this does not mean that
those people are isolated from the larger community.

I believe MOTU's purpose is to work on high quality packages
in the universe repo. Nothing excludes people working
a majority of time on KDE packages to do that. Hence
the suggestion not to be welcomed in MOTU because
of a preference or experience to a certain set of packages
is inappropriate and counter-productive. How should someone
get a broader horizon when he is sent away in the try to do so?

Remember, it was asked for mentorship for MOTU, not particular
questions for a Kubuntu package!

So please let's be mindful, that we are one big family and
that we are all following the same goal. We support each other,
we are inclusive, not exclusive!

Just my 2c!

Ralph (txwikinger)

On 06/16/2010 08:04 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>> Today in my backscroll I see:
>>
>> [15:13:58]  shadeslayer, what do you want?
>>  
> [...]
>
>> [15:29:16]  fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by maco in
>> #kubuntu-devel :P
>>
>> This is completely inappropriate. Let me know when #ubuntu-motu is open for
>> everyone in the Ubuntu community.
>>  
> Sorry, maybe I'm being dense, but which part exactly is offensive?
>
>


-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Please do not tell people interested in working on Qt/KDE apps in Universe #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel

2010-06-16 Thread Soren Hansen
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Today in my backscroll I see:
> 
> [15:13:58]  shadeslayer, what do you want?
[...]
> [15:29:16]  fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by maco in 
> #kubuntu-devel :P
> 
> This is completely inappropriate. Let me know when #ubuntu-motu is open for 
> everyone in the Ubuntu community.

Sorry, maybe I'm being dense, but which part exactly is offensive?

-- 
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Developer
http://www.ubuntu.com/

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


HELLO

2010-06-16 Thread osama mongy
Dear all ,

This is Osama ,An egyptian computer engineering student . I'm writing this
mail and I'm full of hope to get help from you people .
This is my issue ,I'm still a student but I'm too interested in the
operating systems specially linux so I want to learn from you guys to make
me able to help in ubuntu development .
I knew from the web site that I can find a mentor to help me in this so it
would be pleasure to get help from you .
I use ubuntu 10.4 , well knowledge in c++ programming language and using gcc
compiler on terminal and sometimes codeblocks IDE .

Hopeing to get help soon ,

Thanks too much ,
Best Regards ,

-- 
OSAMA MONGY
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu