[Bug 711587] Re: powernap and Eucalyptus seem unable to reach an understanding
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Natty) Milestone: ubuntu-11.04-beta-1 = ubuntu-11.04-beta-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711587 Title: powernap and Eucalyptus seem unable to reach an understanding -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745946] Re: cloud-final job did not run
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - cloud-final job did not run + cloud-final job did not run in ec2-automated-tests -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745946 Title: cloud-final job did not run in ec2-automated-tests -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 745599] Re: fails on automatic update
Hi Serge I would but apt-cache clean is reported as not valid, and I cannot see a command that it would be ... dave@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache apt 0.7.25.3ubuntu9.3 for i386 compiled on Sep 9 2010 22:22:00 Usage: apt-cache [options] command apt-cache [options] add file1 [file2 ...] apt-cache [options] showpkg pkg1 [pkg2 ...] apt-cache [options] showsrc pkg1 [pkg2 ...] apt-cache is a low-level tool used to manipulate APT's binary cache files, and query information from them Commands: add - Add a package file to the source cache gencaches - Build both the package and source cache showpkg - Show some general information for a single package showsrc - Show source records stats - Show some basic statistics dump - Show the entire file in a terse form dumpavail - Print an available file to stdout unmet - Show unmet dependencies search - Search the package list for a regex pattern show - Show a readable record for the package depends - Show raw dependency information for a package rdepends - Show reverse dependency information for a package pkgnames - List the names of all packages in the system dotty - Generate package graphs for GraphViz xvcg - Generate package graphs for xvcg policy - Show policy settings Options: -h This help text. -p=? The package cache. -s=? The source cache. -q Disable progress indicator. -i Show only important deps for the unmet command. -c=? Read this configuration file -o=? Set an arbitrary configuration option, eg -o dir::cache=/tmp See the apt-cache(8) and apt.conf(5) manual pages for more information. On 31 March 2011 00:59, Serge Hallyn 745...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. The error messages claim that the package file is corrupt. Can you please try to clean the cache and re-try the upgrade? Clean the cache with apt-cache clean and then re-try the update with apt-get dist-upgrade ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745599 Title: fails on automatic update To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/745599/+subscribe -- regards David -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745599 Title: fails on automatic update -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 744976] Re: euca-describe-snapshots lists all public snapshots
** Also affects: euca2ools Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744976 Title: euca-describe-snapshots lists all public snapshots -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 322214] Re: php (via libedit using_history()) incorrectly opens stdin
Note that neither Debian Lenny (php5-cli 5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny10) nor Debian Squeeze (php5-cli 5.3.3-7+squeeze1) have this problem; Upcoming 11.04 Natty Narwhal still does have it, as you know. Thanks for your work on this @Clint -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322214 Title: php (via libedit using_history()) incorrectly opens stdin -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 741661] Re: Web UI does not work from default install (2.1.0~bzr-2009-0ubuntu1)l
This bug was fixed in the package cobbler - 2.1.0-0ubuntu1 --- cobbler (2.1.0-0ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Make it a bit more easier to configure cobbler_web (LP: #741661) * Drop java dependencies since cobbler4j is no longer shipped upstream. -- Chuck Short zul...@ubuntu.com Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:54:56 -0400 ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741661 Title: Web UI does not work from default install (2.1.0~bzr-2009-0ubuntu1)l -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 742104] Re: OpenLDAP remote DoS: CVE-2011-1081
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-security- announce/2011-March/001293.html ** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Maverick) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Natty) Milestone: None = ubuntu-11.04-beta-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742104 Title: OpenLDAP remote DoS: CVE-2011-1081 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746497] [NEW] libvirt installs firewall rules on package upgrades
Public bug reported: libvirt recently had a security upgrade. Every time the package has an upgrade it re-installs firewall rules with means all my VMs loose Internet connectivity. After upgrade: nafallo@pony:~$ sudo iptables -vnL Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 3943M packets, 2378G bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- bklabs * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:53 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- bklabs * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:53 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- bklabs * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:67 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- bklabs * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:67 Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 14G packets, 11T bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * bklabs 0.0.0.0/091.194.67.9 0 0 ACCEPT all -- bklabs * 91.194.67.9 0.0.0.0/0 38 3992 ACCEPT all -- bklabs bklabs 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 367 34537 REJECT all -- * bklabs 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable 271 17023 REJECT all -- bklabs * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 2317M packets, 1709G bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Fix: nafallo@pony:~$ sudo iptables -F My setup is not the default, but I'm bored of having the package upgrades break my setup. ** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746497 Title: libvirt installs firewall rules on package upgrades -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746497] Re: libvirt installs firewall rules on package upgrades
Not to confuse the matter, but here is my network template for the network (the other parts of how things work is in my quagga config): nafallo@pony:~$ cat /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/bklabs.xml network namebklabs/name bridge name=bklabs/ forward mode=route/ ip address=91.194.67.9 netmask=255.255.255.255/ /network -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746497 Title: libvirt installs firewall rules on package upgrades -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
This bug was fixed in the package bind9 - 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2 --- bind9 (1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low * debian/rules, configure, contrib/dlz/config.dlz.in: use DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH so we can find multiarch libraries and fix FTBFS. (LP: #745642) -- Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@ubuntu.com Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:19:37 -0400 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743484] Re: libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols
This bug was fixed in the package nut - 2.6.0-1ubuntu2 --- nut (2.6.0-1ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low * fix_pc_file.patch: fix .pc source files by using LIBSSL_LIBS instead of LIBSSL_LDFLAGS to avoid a FTBFS in packages that uses libupsclient.pc (LP: #743484) -- Fabrice Coutadeur fabric...@ubuntu.com Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:21:01 +0200 ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743484 Title: libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 556332] Re: leftover /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist on each upgrade
This bug was fixed in the package bind9 - 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu1 --- bind9 (1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low * debian/bind9-default.md5sum: - updated to reflect the default md5sum in maverick and natty, this avoids a bogus /etc/default/bind9.dpkg-dist file (LP: #556332) -- Michael Vogt michael.v...@ubuntu.com Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:13:11 +0200 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556332 Title: leftover /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist on each upgrade -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746497] Re: libvirt installs firewall rules on package upgrades
I should have mentioned this is Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, fully up-to-date. I had the same problem on 8.04 LTS and 8.10, and haven't tried any other versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746497 Title: libvirt installs firewall rules on package upgrades -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746541] [NEW] Unable to upgrade tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1.2)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 I am unable to upgrade tomcat6 package. #apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1.2) ... sed: -e expression #1, char 123: unknown option to `s' dpkg: error processing tomcat6 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: tomcat6 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746541 Title: Unable to upgrade tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1.2) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 556332] Re: leftover /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist on each upgrade
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/bind9 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556332 Title: leftover /etc/init.d/bind9.dpkg-dist on each upgrade -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Canonical Server Team (canonical-server) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 585108] Re: euca_conf --register-nodes returns 0 but the node is not registered
Using Marverick Meerkat 10.10: When trying to --register-cluster the same cluster: failed to register new cluster, please log in to the admin interface and check cloud status. This is described in bug 627963! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585108 Title: euca_conf --register-nodes returns 0 but the node is not registered -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.
I dont agree with option number 2 because it would break the netbios protocol. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetBIOS#NetBIOS_name Couldn't ubiquity do something reasonable to limit the hostname to within 16 characters? chuck -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: Canonical Server Team (canonical-server) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 732082] Re: Eucalyptus admin tools should not be shipped in eucalyptus-common package
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/natty/eucalyptus/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732082 Title: Eucalyptus admin tools should not be shipped in eucalyptus-common package -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 731672] Re: missing depends -- python-psutil
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/natty/eucalyptus/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731672 Title: missing depends -- python-psutil -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 726769] Re: package eucalyptus-common 2.0.1 bzr1255-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/natty/eucalyptus/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726769 Title: package eucalyptus-common 2.0.1 bzr1255-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 697753] Re: bittorrent recommendation prevents bittorrent demotion
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/natty/eucalyptus/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697753 Title: bittorrent recommendation prevents bittorrent demotion -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746586] [NEW] node deregister eucalyptus.local.conf
Public bug reported: Using eucalyptus 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4.1: When --deregister-nodes it echo's SUCCESS: removed node '10.0.0.2' from '//etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.local.conf' Which is misleading, because: no node found in eucalyptus.local.conf before --deregister-cluster and after --register-cluster. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746586 Title: node deregister eucalyptus.local.conf -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 627963] Re: [maverick] Inconsistent certificates prevent CC to start correctly (no cc.log)
Got the problem as described above on a Intel Xeon. Did the workaround #9 and --register-cluster without stop/start eucalyptus! Using eucalyptus (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4.1) on Maverick Meerkat (10.10). After the reboot, again --deregister-cluster and then --register- cluster. No error's! But it is reproducible when: sudo euca_conf --list-nodes echo's registered node sudo euca_conf --deregister-nodes 10.0.0.2 sudo euca_conf --list-nodes echo's registered node sudo euca_conf --deregister-cluster cluster2011mrt sudo euca_conf --register-cluster cluster2011mrt 10.0.0.2 sudo euca_conf --list-nodes echo's nothing sudo euca_conf --register-nodes 10.0.0.2 sudo euca_conf --list-nodes echo's nothing sudo euca_conf --deregister-cluster cluster2011mrt sudo euca_conf --register-cluster cluster2011mrt 10.0.0.2 Needs time to do something! Then: echo's ERROR: failed to register new cluster, please log in to the admin interface and check cloud status. Few second's later, try again without workaround #9: sudo euca_conf --register-cluster cluster2011mrt 10.0.0.2 echo's SUCCESS: new cluster It looks it is time related on a old Intel XEON! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627963 Title: [maverick] Inconsistent certificates prevent CC to start correctly (no cc.log) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.
Some commentary from IRC: zul: ev: ping for the samba bug, couldnt ubiquity do something sensible and not allow more that 16 characters in a hostname? [18:04] ScottK: Why is a 16 character hostname limit sensible? [18:04] ev: zul: this is a limitation in netbios, not linux. [18:05] ev: ScottK: indeed [18:06] ev: I think this is best solved where the problem arises, in Samba. I can talk to another machine with more than 16 characters in its hostname using every other network protocol I can think of. [18:06] ev: equally, you can set the hostname outside of the installer, so even if we did this in ubiquity, the problem would remain. [18:07] zul: ev: right its a problem with netbios...so something like print a warning or something [18:08] ScottK: RFC 1123 says Host software MUST handle host names of up to 63 characters and SHOULD handle host names of up to 255 characters. [18:08] zul: ScottK: right ill get on changing the netbios protocol [18:09] ScottK: I understand the problem. [18:09] • ScottK imagines a netbios equivalent for hostnames of 8.3 long/short filenames. I am firmly against modifying ubiquity to work around limitations in the NetBIOS protocol. This belongs in Samba. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 615442] Re: euca-describe-users fails with ImportError: No module named euca_admin.users
Using eucalyptus 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4.1 Maverick Meerkat: For the euca-describe-clusters, euca-describe-properties, euca-describe- storage-controllers, euca-describe-users and euca-describe-walruses are no modules present with a default installation! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615442 Title: euca-describe-users fails with ImportError: No module named euca_admin.users -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 732082] Re: Eucalyptus admin tools should not be shipped in eucalyptus-common package
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3 --- eucalyptus (2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low * Separate admin tools from eucalyptus-common package(LP: #732082) - debian/control: + Add eucalyptus-admin-tools binary package. + Add missing Depends on python-psutil. (LP: #731672) + eucalyptus-cloud: Depends on eucalyptus-admin-tools. - debian/eucalyptus-admin-tools.install: Added. - debian/eucalyptus-common.install: Drop installation of admin tools. * Switch to dh_python2 instead of python-central. - debian/control. Bump Depends on cdbs to (= 0.4.90~); bump depends on python to (= 2.6.6-3). * Add powernap configs to leverage recent PowerNap changes (LP: #726769): - debian/powernap/eucalyptus.conf: Add config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.install: Install config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.links: Symlink to /etc/powernap/config.d/. * debian/control: Change Recommends order of bittorrent to bittornado first. Allows demontion of bittorrent. (LP: #697753) -- Andres Rodriguez andres...@ubuntu.com Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:23:36 -0400 ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732082 Title: Eucalyptus admin tools should not be shipped in eucalyptus-common package -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 731672] Re: missing depends -- python-psutil
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3 --- eucalyptus (2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low * Separate admin tools from eucalyptus-common package(LP: #732082) - debian/control: + Add eucalyptus-admin-tools binary package. + Add missing Depends on python-psutil. (LP: #731672) + eucalyptus-cloud: Depends on eucalyptus-admin-tools. - debian/eucalyptus-admin-tools.install: Added. - debian/eucalyptus-common.install: Drop installation of admin tools. * Switch to dh_python2 instead of python-central. - debian/control. Bump Depends on cdbs to (= 0.4.90~); bump depends on python to (= 2.6.6-3). * Add powernap configs to leverage recent PowerNap changes (LP: #726769): - debian/powernap/eucalyptus.conf: Add config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.install: Install config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.links: Symlink to /etc/powernap/config.d/. * debian/control: Change Recommends order of bittorrent to bittornado first. Allows demontion of bittorrent. (LP: #697753) -- Andres Rodriguez andres...@ubuntu.com Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:23:36 -0400 ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731672 Title: missing depends -- python-psutil -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 726769] Re: package eucalyptus-common 2.0.1 bzr1255-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3 --- eucalyptus (2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low * Separate admin tools from eucalyptus-common package(LP: #732082) - debian/control: + Add eucalyptus-admin-tools binary package. + Add missing Depends on python-psutil. (LP: #731672) + eucalyptus-cloud: Depends on eucalyptus-admin-tools. - debian/eucalyptus-admin-tools.install: Added. - debian/eucalyptus-common.install: Drop installation of admin tools. * Switch to dh_python2 instead of python-central. - debian/control. Bump Depends on cdbs to (= 0.4.90~); bump depends on python to (= 2.6.6-3). * Add powernap configs to leverage recent PowerNap changes (LP: #726769): - debian/powernap/eucalyptus.conf: Add config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.install: Install config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.links: Symlink to /etc/powernap/config.d/. * debian/control: Change Recommends order of bittorrent to bittornado first. Allows demontion of bittorrent. (LP: #697753) -- Andres Rodriguez andres...@ubuntu.com Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:23:36 -0400 ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726769 Title: package eucalyptus-common 2.0.1 bzr1255-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 697753] Re: bittorrent recommendation prevents bittorrent demotion
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3 --- eucalyptus (2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low * Separate admin tools from eucalyptus-common package(LP: #732082) - debian/control: + Add eucalyptus-admin-tools binary package. + Add missing Depends on python-psutil. (LP: #731672) + eucalyptus-cloud: Depends on eucalyptus-admin-tools. - debian/eucalyptus-admin-tools.install: Added. - debian/eucalyptus-common.install: Drop installation of admin tools. * Switch to dh_python2 instead of python-central. - debian/control. Bump Depends on cdbs to (= 0.4.90~); bump depends on python to (= 2.6.6-3). * Add powernap configs to leverage recent PowerNap changes (LP: #726769): - debian/powernap/eucalyptus.conf: Add config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.install: Install config. - debian/eucalyptus-nc.links: Symlink to /etc/powernap/config.d/. * debian/control: Change Recommends order of bittorrent to bittornado first. Allows demontion of bittorrent. (LP: #697753) -- Andres Rodriguez andres...@ubuntu.com Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:23:36 -0400 ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697753 Title: bittorrent recommendation prevents bittorrent demotion -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 605062] Re: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths
Closing bug report then. ** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605062 Title: (lucid) autofs had a strange behaviour with paths -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/isc-dhcp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717166 Title: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.
Mac OS X broadcasts the first 15 characters of your hostname via NetBIOS. This works for them so it could be a good solution for Ubuntu as well. If you have to, you could perhaps set up a truncated hostname alias if the samba hostname must be reachable through /etc/hosts? That way the machine could be reached by both 15 and 63 (or 255) byte names, or am I wrong? If not, just truncate it in the smb.conf and notify user of the shorter NETBIOS name to browse for just like in OSX? I'm for the second option. BTW, make sure that you use 15 and not 16 characters as the limit for samba hosts... From wikipedia: The NetBIOS name is 16 ASCII characters, however Microsoft limits the hostname to 15 characters and reserves the 16th character as a NetBIOS Suffix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 742748] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
** Also affects: backuppc (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: High Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742748 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 742748] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
I was able to recreate this when installing the same version of backuppc. ** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742748 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
** Also affects: squid (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.04.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750 Title: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 741661] Re: Web UI does not work from default install (2.1.0~bzr-2009-0ubuntu1)l
Hmm, there's a bit more work to be done on this bug. 1) I still had to edit cobbler_web.conf and comment out: #CustomLog logs/access_log combined env=!dontlog 2) The symlinks in cobbler-web.postinst all need to be ln -sf, or else upgrades of the package will fail. 3) I still had to edit /etc/cobbler/modules.conf and set: module = authn_configfile 4) I still had to add users to /etc/cobbler/users.digest and restart. I have a patch that solves most of this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741661 Title: Web UI does not work from default install (2.1.0~bzr-2009-0ubuntu1)l -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 741661] Re: Web UI does not work from default install (2.1.0~bzr-2009-0ubuntu1)l
** Patch added: 741661.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/741661/+attachment/1961361/+files/741661.debdiff ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741661 Title: Web UI does not work from default install (2.1.0~bzr-2009-0ubuntu1)l -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746847] [NEW] cobbler packages don't rebuild
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cobbler Looks like 'make clean' needs to clear out: * docs/cobbler.1.gz docs/cobbler-register.1.gz docs/koan.1.gz Or if not, in the rules file, at least ** Affects: cobbler (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: In Progress ** Affects: cobbler (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Medium Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) ** Also affects: cobbler (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Medium Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746847 Title: cobbler packages don't rebuild -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746854] [NEW] upgrades broken if symlinks exist, one symlink is plain wrong
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cobbler I'm not sure why these symlinks are being handled in cobbler- web.postint, but I do see two problems with them: 1) one of the symlinks is wrong; it should be: ln -sf /usr/share/cobbler/webroot/cobbler_webui_content /var/www/cobbler_webui_content 2) we need ln -sf so that upgrade succeed; otherwise, an upgrade of this package will fail in the postinst if those symlinks are present I'd rather see these moved entirely to a cobbler-web.links file. But in the mean time, let's fix what's just plain broken. ** Affects: cobbler (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: Fix Released ** Affects: cobbler (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: High Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: Fix Released ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = High ** Also affects: cobbler (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: High Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746854 Title: upgrades broken if symlinks exist, one symlink is plain wrong -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746854] Re: upgrades broken if symlinks exist, one symlink is plain wrong
** Patch added: 746854.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/746854/+attachment/1961407/+files/746854.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746854 Title: upgrades broken if symlinks exist, one symlink is plain wrong -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746854] Re: upgrades broken if symlinks exist, one symlink is plain wrong
This bug was fixed in the package cobbler - 2.1.0-0ubuntu2 --- cobbler (2.1.0-0ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low * debian/rules: clean out manpage zipfiles, so that rebuilds work, LP: #746847 * debian/cobbler-web.postinst: LP: #746854 - fix broken link - use ln -sf so that upgrades work -- Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:23:29 -0500 ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu Natty) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746854 Title: upgrades broken if symlinks exist, one symlink is plain wrong -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746847] Re: cobbler packages don't rebuild
This bug was fixed in the package cobbler - 2.1.0-0ubuntu2 --- cobbler (2.1.0-0ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low * debian/rules: clean out manpage zipfiles, so that rebuilds work, LP: #746847 * debian/cobbler-web.postinst: LP: #746854 - fix broken link - use ln -sf so that upgrades work -- Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:23:29 -0500 ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu Natty) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746847 Title: cobbler packages don't rebuild -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 719174] Re: Typo in package description string
This bug was fixed in the package qemu-kvm - 0.14.0+noroms-0ubuntu4 --- qemu-kvm (0.14.0+noroms-0ubuntu4) natty; urgency=low *LP: #719174 Typo corrected -- Bhaveek Desai bhaveekdesai...@gmail.com Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:06:54 +0530 ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719174 Title: Typo in package description string -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
GJS changes to support this release: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646369 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #646369 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646369 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746963] [NEW] package clamav-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav Just tried to install clamav from Synaptic. It error'ed out running clamav-base's config script ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 1 09:34:46 2011 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: clamav-base (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-23.74-generic SourcePackage: clamav Title: package clamav-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-23-generic i686 ** Affects: clamav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746963 Title: package clamav-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746963] Re: package clamav-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746963 Title: package clamav-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Nagios
Félim Whiteley wrote: I'd have to put my +1 for getting Shinken (http://www.shinken-monitoring.org/) in it's place. It's config file compatible but is actively developed (ok not completely fair on Nagios but it's a monolithic engine and the web interface still looks like they are partying like it's 1997). Perhaps it's a little early in the dev cycle for Shinken but I've found the folks on the dev list really pushing it past Nagios. Also its got a comedy like Ubuntu release name for 0.5 ;) +1 for Shinken, which is designed in a cloud-compatible way (multiple types of parallel workers). Compatibility with Nagios config files is definitely a +. Written in Python. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Ubuntu core developer -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Fwd: Cobbler 2.1.0
Very cool, an official release of Cobbler is now available that can install Ubuntu and Debian. We should be shipping 2.1.0 in 11.04, or at least, a very very close pre-released version of it. --- Begin forwarded message from Scott Henson --- From: Scott Henson shen...@redhat.com To: cobbler development list cobbler-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:11:10 -0700 Subject: Cobbler 2.1.0 I'd like to officially announce availability of Cobbler 2.1.0 [0]. It contains a lot of new functionality. The biggest of these changes are the addition of a bunch of new Distributions that we can manage. I think most people will find Debian and Ubuntu support to be the most interesting. Please check the change log and git for all the particulars. Thanks to all who made this possible. Enjoy. [0] - http://shenson.fedorapeople.org/cobbler/cobbler-2.1.0.tar.gz --- End forwarded message --- -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Ubuntu Server hardware requirements...
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements This states the following requirements for running Ubuntu Server: * 300 MHz x86 processor * 128MB of system memory (RAM) * 1GB of disk space * Graphics card and monitor capable of 640x480 * CD-ROM drive The first one is somewhat funny, as I think there were only a few early Pentium II's and PentiumPro's that ran at 300Mhz. Since we dropped i586 support in Maverick, might we also think about raising this to say, 450Mhz ? Also while there are things one can do w/ 128MB of RAM on Ubuntu Server.. is it a realistic minimum? Do we actually require a graphics card? If you are clever you can get the alternative installer to install via serial console IIRC. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Ubuntu Server hardware requirements...
Hi I'm just an (ex-) user of ubuntu-server, but On Thursday 31 March 2011 09:43:33 Clint Byrum wrote: Also while there are things one can do w/ 128MB of RAM on Ubuntu Server.. is it a realistic minimum? Think about running ubuntu server in a VM along with many others, if it fits into 128MB it's great! Do we actually require a graphics card? If you are clever you can get the alternative installer to install via serial console IIRC. Also CD-ROM drive required? PXE and USB are certainly possible when you don't have a drive, right? Cheers Carsten -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
On 31/03/11 00:19, Clint Byrum wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:16:14AM -0400, Ralph Janke wrote: Isn't it time to use mariadb instead of mysql? Could you provide some rationalization of MariaDB vs. the main MySQL releases? There are a bunch of forks we could consider with varying degrees of compatibility with MYSQL. Percona (working on packaging) MariaDB (available from their own repos) Drizzle (in universe) Compatible or not, none of these are really MySQL. I'd really like to have a good reason before moving to any of these as our preferred MySQL service. I don't think MySQL is like Hudson.. Oracle seems to be taking good care of it and (for the time being) nothing has changed in their approach to community contribution (which has never been fantastic anyway). There seems to be at least some interest in other options. As Clint points out, rational needs to be known in order to make a reasonable decision. I am not familiar with the details of the other mysql compatible database options. If we have a UDS session discussing this, we really need the facts available before the session. I'd like to request that interested people help complete a feature matrix on the wiki [0]. Please feel free to add as much information as possible. In this instance, a Feature can also be a negative thing. Please add suitable references. Thanks, your help is appreciated. [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase/FeatureComparison/MySQL Kind Regards, Dave Walker -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
On 03/30/2011 04:40 PM, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I do not have the statistics in front of me, but I believe most of users are using LTS releases of Ubuntu. Here are the stats from the latest server survey: 10.10 (8) 1793 33.17% 10.04 LTS (7) 2880 53.28% 9.10 (6) 461 8.53% 9.04 (5) 306 5.66% 8.10 (4) 121 2.24% 8.04LTS (3) 854 15.80% 6.06LTS (1) 104 1.92% Which confirms you point: 71% of our user base is on an LTS. The policy of cherrypicking fixes from the development releases does not scale in my opinon. We should offer PPAs for users who want to use a new version of for example Apache. Or go through the list of packages we support and see if we can get it to qualify as a micro release update. Strongly agree on this point if we focus on stable release for a list of specified packages (defining this list should be our first task). I would suggest that our commitment should be the same as for point releases: for the list of packages, stable releases would be made available until the next LTS, on PPA per stable release. The PPA usage would, I think, ensure that people do not upgrade to a major new version without knowing it. Nick signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Puppet Integration
On 03/30/2011 05:04 PM, Etienne Goyer wrote: On 11-03-30 10:53 AM, Chuck Short wrote: Ubuntu server should be offering better Puppet integration. This includes the following: * Making it really easy to deploy a puppet master server. * Possible d-i integration * Pre-canned puppet reciepes It's been an ongoing topic for while. I think we really have the opportunity to differentiate Ubuntu here. In particular, preseedable d-i integration would make Ubuntu deployment a completely hands-off operation. Again, count me in for that one! Isn't this already achievable by preseding a cloud-init script which then does the puppet magic? Nick signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Improvements to cobbler
On 03/30/2011 05:14 PM, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I would like to see more puppet intergration with cobbler. I'd like to see cobbler to grow a field to a cloud-init script that would be used to preseed the machine, so that the script is served directly by the cobbler server. Nick signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Nagios
On 30/03/11 20:58, Greg Wallace wrote: OpenNMS www.*opennms*.org and Zenoss www.*zenoss*.com are two other options that I think are also worthy of consideration. SNIP Seems to me that we should consider dropping nagios from main and promoting icinga as its replacement: SNIP Hi, To try and make comparison easier, can those interested please add to the following feature comparison matrix [0]. For the purpose of a Feature it can be a positive or negative thing. Please add suitable references where possible. Thanks for your help. [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase/FeatureComparison/NetworkMonitoring Kind Regards, Dave Walker -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
tomcat - which version to download
Hi, As of now I am using tomcat apache 5.5.27 with java version 1.6.0_24 on Ubuntu Server 10.04. I happened to visit the url - http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html Bit confused. Not sure which version i need to go for my production purpose to avail latest features and performance improvement. Please suggest/guide. Thanks Kaushal -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Ubuntu Server hardware requirements...
Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements This states the following requirements for running Ubuntu Server: * 300 MHz x86 processor * 128MB of system memory (RAM) * 1GB of disk space * Graphics card and monitor capable of 640x480 * CD-ROM drive The first one is somewhat funny, as I think there were only a few early Pentium II's and PentiumPro's that ran at 300Mhz. Since we dropped i586 support in Maverick, might we also think about raising this to say, 450Mhz ? Also while there are things one can do w/ 128MB of RAM on Ubuntu Server.. is it a realistic minimum? Do we actually require a graphics card? If you are clever you can get the alternative installer to install via serial console IIRC. CDROM is definitely not required. Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
On 03/30/2011 07:19 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:16:14AM -0400, Ralph Janke wrote: Isn't it time to use mariadb instead of mysql? Could you provide some rationalization of MariaDB vs. the main MySQL releases? There are a bunch of forks we could consider with varying degrees of compatibility with MYSQL. Percona (working on packaging) MariaDB (available from their own repos) Drizzle (in universe) Compatible or not, none of these are really MySQL. I'd really like to have a good reason before moving to any of these as our preferred MySQL service. I don't think MySQL is like Hudson.. Oracle seems to be taking good care of it and (for the time being) nothing has changed in their approach to community contribution (which has never been fantastic anyway). There are lots of reasons to go to mariadb! 1) They explicitly promise that they are always 100% backwards compatible to the related mysql version, hence nothing is lost in comparison with mysql 2) Mysql only tracks queries with 1s execution time granularity. Mariadb tracks by default ms granularity. This is very important for performance analysis of in particular websites. 3) MariaDb offers additional features (and storage engines) by default that in mysql require proprietary licences to obtain similar. Every case that I know of, mariadb could be just plugged into the system for mysql without any issues. That are only the reasons that come immediately into me head, there are many more when you look at the comparisons. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Feedback on the Ubuntu kernel for server and cloud
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, John Johansen wrote: The kernel team is looking for feedback on the state of the kernel for server and cloud flavors of Ubuntu. Any and all feed back is welcome. What are we doing right? What are we doing wrong? What configs should we change? What new features should we included? And most importantly what are the use cases for any desired changes, so that we can evaluate changes in context. This information will be used to help improve the Ubuntu kernels and to help ensure that we have the best server and cloud flavors available. Something I think should be up for discussion was the flavour versus sub-flavour status of -virtual. We moved to flavour I think in maverick. That gave us more freedom to differentiate from the configuration of the '-server' kernel, but meant that we couldn't 100% just take the modules we needed from -server, as Loic pointed out. I think one of the primary reasons for splitting was to put some kernel modules built-in that previously were not builtin in the -server kernel. I'm not sure exactly which it was, though. I know at one point I had hoped that -virtual would be a small-ish kernel targetting supporting via built-in hypervisor hardware (from virtualbox to vmware to kvm to xen...). There is definitely value in having a kernel that just works, but a small ramdisk isn't that bad. If losing boot without ramdisk is the only thing we really lose by going back to sub-flavour, then I think it should be considered. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
qcow2 snapshotting: does it influence future IO performance?
Hi Alvin. I read on your site that you stopped work on a project because LVM snapshots potentially decreased IO performance, and I also saw that you worked on a perl project to make copies of VMs, so therefore I address my question directly to you. Your work reminded me of something I read some weeks ago on qcow2 on http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/qcow-image-format.html and which raised my brows at the time: Snapshots - real snapshots - are represented in the original image itself. Each snapshot is a read-only record of the image a past instant. The original image remains writable and as modifications are made to it, a copy of the original data is made for any snapshots referring to it. I tried to find more info about this, but didn't yet. So here's my question: does anybody know whether, having made snapshots of a VM during several stages of its life (clean install, important service installed, ...), affects IO performance of any writes made after snapshotting, as one could suspect from my quote above? Regards, Jürgen-- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Ubuntu Server hardware requirements...
Just my $0.02 worth (in line comments): On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote: This states the following requirements for running Ubuntu Server: * 300 MHz x86 processor The requirement of 300 MHz has more to do with providing a backhand way of indicating a generation of processor - it may be prudent to reword this to say Pentium II processor or compatible * 128MB of system memory (RAM) While 128 Meg of RAM is tight for a standard install, I can easily imagine a VM running in that small amount of RAM (what is it called now, a 'minimal' install of Ubuntu Server could probably run fine with 128 Meg). * 1GB of disk space The install media fits on a CD-R, so a 1 gig footprint for the OS seems right (user requirements would certainly add to that, but the 'requirement' is for the OS only) * Graphics card and monitor capable of 640x480 Serial consoles may be an option, but they are far from mainstream, maybe it would make sense to add , or a previously configured serial console Also, as a question, is the 640x480 a hard coded requirement, or can the installer handle lower resolutions? * CD-ROM drive As others have noted, a CD-ROM is not a requirement, maybe add words to the effect or other compatible way to load the OS, USB key, PXE NetBoot, etc. A hardware requirement means something is required to function, not makes for a 'comfortable user experience' - that is why many OS vendors describe both a set of system requirements and a recommended system configuration. Anyway, that's my two cents worth... Ken -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Nagios
- Original Message - Félim Whiteley wrote: I'd have to put my +1 for getting Shinken (http://www.shinken-monitoring.org/) in it's place. It's config file compatible but is actively developed (ok not completely fair on Nagios but it's a monolithic engine and the web interface still looks like they are partying like it's 1997). Perhaps it's a little early in the dev cycle for Shinken but I've found the folks on the dev list really pushing it past Nagios. Also its got a comedy like Ubuntu release name for 0.5 ;) +1 for Shinken, which is designed in a cloud-compatible way (multiple types of parallel workers). Compatibility with Nagios config files is definitely a +. Written in Python. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Ubuntu core developer +1 for Shinken too, it is developed on Ubuntu and I already made some basic packages in a PPA (https://launchpad.net/~shinken-dev/+archive/ppa). It may not be very mature yet but it has a very interesting feature set while retaining compatibility with Nagios configuration files. -- Michael Jeanson Révolution Linux - www.rlnx.com -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: tomcat - which version to download
Excerpts from Kaushal Shriyan's message of Thu Mar 31 04:34:47 -0700 2011: Hi, As of now I am using tomcat apache 5.5.27 with java version 1.6.0_24 on Ubuntu Server 10.04. I happened to visit the url - http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html Bit confused. Not sure which version i need to go for my production purpose to avail latest features and performance improvement. Please suggest/guide. If you want to take advantage of the high degree of stability of 10.04 you should probably think about using the 'tomcat6' package in Lucid, which is v6.0.24 + patches for critical issues. However if you have some specific reason to use tomcat 5.5 .. then you are on your own as far as recommendations.. how can we help you choose? -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Ubuntu Server hardware requirements...
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements This states the following requirements for running Ubuntu Server: * 300 MHz x86 processor * 128MB of system memory (RAM) * 1GB of disk space * Graphics card and monitor capable of 640x480 * CD-ROM drive The first one is somewhat funny, as I think there were only a few early Pentium II's and PentiumPro's that ran at 300Mhz. Since we dropped i586 support in Maverick, might we also think about raising this to say, 450Mhz ? Also while there are things one can do w/ 128MB of RAM on Ubuntu Server.. is it a realistic minimum? Do we actually require a graphics card? If you are clever you can get the alternative installer to install via serial console IIRC. Correct. For reference I was able to install Natty just now in a KVM with no VGA with the following: kvm -cdrom natty-server-amd64.iso -kernel vmlinuz -initrd initrd.gz --append console=ttyS0 priority=critical locale=en_US url=http://bit.ly/uquick; -vga none -serial stdio Note that I loop mounted the iso to extract vmlinuz and initrd.gz, which are required if you use kvm's --append. If you haven't done this before, running the Ubuntu Installer in a virtual machine on a command line over SSH is kind of fun :-) -- :-Dustin -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:55:44 -0400 Ralph Janke txwikin...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 03/30/2011 07:19 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:16:14AM -0400, Ralph Janke wrote: Isn't it time to use mariadb instead of mysql? Could you provide some rationalization of MariaDB vs. the main MySQL releases? There are a bunch of forks we could consider with varying degrees of compatibility with MYSQL. Percona (working on packaging) MariaDB (available from their own repos) Drizzle (in universe) Compatible or not, none of these are really MySQL. I'd really like to have a good reason before moving to any of these as our preferred MySQL service. I don't think MySQL is like Hudson.. Oracle seems to be taking good care of it and (for the time being) nothing has changed in their approach to community contribution (which has never been fantastic anyway). There are lots of reasons to go to mariadb! 1) They explicitly promise that they are always 100% backwards compatible to the related mysql version, hence nothing is lost in comparison with mysql 2) Mysql only tracks queries with 1s execution time granularity. Mariadb tracks by default ms granularity. This is very important for performance analysis of in particular websites. 3) MariaDb offers additional features (and storage engines) by default that in mysql require proprietary licences to obtain similar. Every case that I know of, mariadb could be just plugged into the system for mysql without any issues. That are only the reasons that come immediately into me head, there are many more when you look at the comparisons. HI, Sure Mariadb is great but I'm looking with my distro glasses on and I see this: chuck@kyle:~$ apt-cache rdepends libmysqlclient16 | wc -l 166 The 166 is the number of packages that depend on libmysqlclient for functionality that they need. This includes both main and universe. So unless we have a clear plan of transitioning from mysql to mariadb and help from upstream both in Debian and the mariab developers then one can argue about the technical merits of one database over another until the cows come home. chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
Excerpts from Ralph Janke's message of Thu Mar 31 05:55:44 -0700 2011: On 03/30/2011 07:19 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:16:14AM -0400, Ralph Janke wrote: Isn't it time to use mariadb instead of mysql? I'd really like to have a good reason before moving to any of these as our preferred MySQL service. I don't think MySQL is like Hudson.. Oracle seems to be taking good care of it and (for the time being) nothing has changed in their approach to community contribution (which has never been fantastic anyway). There are lots of reasons to go to mariadb! Ralph, your reasons are pretty compelling. Could you make sure they're up to date in the wiki matrix that Dave Walker posted a link to? I definitely think we should have a discussion about this at UDS. It would be a bold move to move MySQL out of main and instead make the M in our LAMP server MariaDB. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] vlan on cd
- Original Message - ivoks mentioned during a server team meeting that he'd like to see vlan on the cd, and installed by default. +1 That would be very useful in some networks. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Nagios
On 11-03-30 03:57 PM, Ralph Janke wrote: On 03/30/2011 02:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:59 -0400, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I think we should re-evaluate if nagios is the monitoring solution we want to support and if it easy make really really easy to deploy. Seems to me that we should consider dropping nagios from main and promoting icinga as its replacement: https://www.icinga.org/faq/why-a-fork/ +1 from me Not that I care a whole lot, but isn't this somewhat the same debate as MySQL vs. one of the many forks? Nagios is now an household brand in IT. I would be very, very cautious about dumping that out in favor of a recent fork. I am all for doing a competitive analysis, but please take market adoption into account. (Not that I have any love for Nagios; it's hairy and bynzantine. Just saying that we should be cautious here.) -- Etienne Goyer Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd Ubuntu Certified Instructor -LPIC-3 ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Improvements to cobbler
Excerpts from Nicolas Barcet's message of Thu Mar 31 03:20:43 -0700 2011: On 03/30/2011 05:14 PM, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I would like to see more puppet intergration with cobbler. I'd like to see cobbler to grow a field to a cloud-init script that would be used to preseed the machine, so that the script is served directly by the cobbler server. I believe this is already handled by the preseed file with preseed/run -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
Excerpts from Scott Kitterman's message of Wed Mar 30 08:31:15 -0700 2011: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports It's driven by user request and testing. In the case of packages with rdepends we require testing of those as well (sometimes rdepends need to be backported as well) so we don't leave users with a broken system. A reasonably large fraction of users enable backports, so we need to be careful (you should have seenthe flurry of bug reports when I did a backport that broke Flash). Once we have not-automatic fully deployed we might be able to reconsider this. Backports are a purely community driven process, so we're always looking for more help. Scott, I think it may be worth arguing for a bit more of the Canonical-Employed server team members' time if backports achieves the level of usability that seems very close. I think it would certainly make upstreams happier too if instead of cherrypicking medium priority fixes into -updates, we just put critical fixes in -updates and pointed anyone wanting those nit-pick bugs fixed at backports. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Nagios
On 31/03/2011 15:34, Etienne Goyer wrote: On 11-03-30 03:57 PM, Ralph Janke wrote: On 03/30/2011 02:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:59 -0400, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I think we should re-evaluate if nagios is the monitoring solution we want to support and if it easy make really really easy to deploy. Seems to me that we should consider dropping nagios from main and promoting icinga as its replacement: https://www.icinga.org/faq/why-a-fork/ +1 from me Not that I care a whole lot, but isn't this somewhat the same debate as MySQL vs. one of the many forks? Nagios is now an household brand in IT. I would be very, very cautious about dumping that out in favor of a recent fork. I am all for doing a competitive analysis, but please take market adoption into account. (Not that I have any love for Nagios; it's hairy and bynzantine. Just saying that we should be cautious here.) + 1 from me -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Cobbler 2.1.0
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote: Very cool, an official release of Cobbler is now available that can install Ubuntu and Debian. Great work! -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Nagios
Excerpts from Etienne Goyer's message of Thu Mar 31 07:34:56 -0700 2011: On 11-03-30 03:57 PM, Ralph Janke wrote: On 03/30/2011 02:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:59 -0400, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I think we should re-evaluate if nagios is the monitoring solution we want to support and if it easy make really really easy to deploy. Seems to me that we should consider dropping nagios from main and promoting icinga as its replacement: https://www.icinga.org/faq/why-a-fork/ +1 from me Not that I care a whole lot, but isn't this somewhat the same debate as MySQL vs. one of the many forks? Nagios is now an household brand in IT. I would be very, very cautious about dumping that out in favor of a recent fork. I am all for doing a competitive analysis, but please take market adoption into account. We have already committed to Nagios for 4 more years with 10.04. Its not going anywhere. Meanwhile in 1 year, we will be making another commitment with P. I'd like to see us make the delta between O and P's seeds very small, and largely subtractive (removing things we don't want to support). So if we're going to make a bold move, we should analyze these things with an eye for where it appears they will go in the next year. IMO, Nagios will remain popular, but lose ground slowly to alternatives (as it has for the last few years). Icinga is a mystery to me, but should get better than Nagios. Zenoss seems to be gaining steam at a rapid pace. This Shinken thing looks *very* interesting, and they've made a very wise decision to stick w/ nagios config file compatibility. The way I'd like to see this happen is people read up on all the alternatives, talk to users, and bring their experience and knowledge of the conflicts, positives, and negatives for each with them to a UDS session. We should try to accomplish as much as possible here and on the wiki page so the session can stay focused on the question at hand: Should nagios remain in main, and if not, what would take its place? -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 11:02:11 AM Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Scott Kitterman's message of Wed Mar 30 08:31:15 -0700 2011: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports It's driven by user request and testing. In the case of packages with rdepends we require testing of those as well (sometimes rdepends need to be backported as well) so we don't leave users with a broken system. A reasonably large fraction of users enable backports, so we need to be careful (you should have seenthe flurry of bug reports when I did a backport that broke Flash). Once we have not-automatic fully deployed we might be able to reconsider this. Backports are a purely community driven process, so we're always looking for more help. Scott, I think it may be worth arguing for a bit more of the Canonical-Employed server team members' time if backports achieves the level of usability that seems very close. I think it would certainly make upstreams happier too if instead of cherrypicking medium priority fixes into -updates, we just put critical fixes in -updates and pointed anyone wanting those nit-pick bugs fixed at backports. That's exactly the model we'd like to have. More contribution is, of course, welcome. I would really like to minimize the amount of out of archive stuff our users need to get their needs met. Backports is, IMO, an important part of this. Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
On 11-03-30 11:38 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote: On the other hand, it doesn't make sense to break everyone's servers every month when we update the apache or php version and the config files/features/ABI change and their applications stop working. This is the type of thing that enterprises dread...and is why IE6 took so long to die... The use-case I have in mind is people deploying LTS now to found out there is a bug in a package important to them that has been fixed in a later release. If the bug is not SRU-worthy, their options boils down to 1. run a non-LTS release of Ubuntu to benefit from the bug fix, or 2. use an unsupported/unmaintained version of the buggy package (backport, PPA, compiled from source, whatever). Agreed that Apache is not such a good example here. -- Etienne Goyer Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd Ubuntu Certified Instructor -LPIC-3 ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Fwd: Cobbler 2.1.0
Excerpts from Scott Kitterman's message of Thu Mar 31 08:24:05 -0700 2011: I accepted 2.1.0 into the archive earlier this morning. And there was much rejoicing! -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Puppet Integration
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:59:17 -1000 Paul Graydon p...@paulgraydon.co.uk wrote: On 03/30/2011 04:53 AM, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, Ubuntu server should be offering better Puppet integration. This includes the following: * Making it really easy to deploy a puppet master server. * Possible d-i integration * Pre-canned puppet reciepes Regards chuck To play a little bit of devils advocate, what is wrong with the current method? Puppet installs over apt-get and takes editing a quick /etc/default/puppet file to say YES to enable it (rather than risk conflicts) Paul Nothing is wrong with the current method per se. My view is that it just provides the basics to the users. With Ubuntu orchestra as said before we are trying to offer more than what we currently offer, which is the basics. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:25:44 -0400 Etienne Goyer etienne.go...@canonical.com wrote: On 11-03-30 11:05 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:40:36 AM Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I do not have the statistics in front of me, but I believe most of users are using LTS releases of Ubuntu. The policy of cherrypicking fixes from the development releases does not scale in my opinon. We should offer PPAs for users who want to use a new version of for example Apache. Or go through the list of packages we support and see if we can get it to qualify as a micro release update. We can also do a lot of this through backports. We are very close to having the backports only install packages that users explicitly request from backports (just waiting on an LP change that's in progress), so it will be much safer to use going forward. The mechanism itself is really only half the question. I am more interested in the level of commitment we are willing to make in keeping certain key software fresh in LTS. Whether we deliver these in backports, PPA or some other mechanism is really just an implementation detail, IMHO. Right when I brought this up, I was more interested in the burden of tracking down the fixes in upstream code, backporing the fix, and asking for user testing. If you look at: http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html We have a lot of requests for SRU bug fixes which takes time to fix. Depending on the workload that what have, we do what we can. From the systems administrator perspective if they want to use newer versions of apache, mysql, etc then great they can use backports/ppa. If they want to be a more cautious then they can still use the *-updates pocket. Its really all about choice in this case. chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Ubuntu Server hardware requirements...
My 2 cents: We have some VM's that use only 128MB, they are in production and are part of a large deployment. On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Ken Hansen n2...@verizon.net wrote: Just my $0.02 worth (in line comments): On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote: * 128MB of system memory (RAM) While 128 Meg of RAM is tight for a standard install, I can easily imagine a VM running in that small amount of RAM (what is it called now, a 'minimal' install of Ubuntu Server could probably run fine with 128 Meg). -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Server Boot
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: There was a lot of discussion around improving the server boot experience before the UDS-M. A number of people expressed interest in seeing more useful diagnostic information during boot. Others expressed concerns with boot reliability on the more complex hardware typically found in servers. How are we doing on this? Personally, I can't remember the last time I rebooted a server and it wasn't via SSH and the hardware I use is the sort there were problems with. Are these still issues for the Ubuntu Server community? Scott K Our servers are still either Lucid or Hardy, so forgive me if this has been addressed in Meerkat. An issue we ran into when moving servers to Lucid was the new (to me at least) nobootwait flag for fstab. This bit us because we were migrating our data partition from one RAID array to another. We thought we had everything setup correctly, rebooted for one reason or another, and the server would not come up. The bad thing is that our server was in a colo facility, not in our office (like I'm sure a lot of them are). Long story short, we had fat fingered the fstab entry for our data partition that we mount at /var/data. The server was just sitting there waiting for someone to hook up a monitor and press the s key so it would skip trying to mount /var/data, and would boot the system so we could fix it. In the end, we just paid our colo's remote hands fee and had them do it, but it was annoying to have to pay them a fee just to push the s key so we could fix our system. Are there any plans/ideas to prevent that from happening? We have since been sure to add the nobootwait option to our non-os related partitions for safe keeping in the future, and I am sure it was probably mentioned in the release notes somewhere, but it seems kind of backwards to keep a commonly headless machine like a server from booting, when it can, just because another (perhaps non essential) partition isn't setup correctly. In the past, it would have booted up and just not mounted the data partition. Thanks, Preston -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: qcow2 snapshotting: does it influence future IO performance?
On Thursday 31 March 2011 15:15:35 jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote: Hi Alvin. I read on your site that you stopped work on a project because LVM snapshots potentially decreased IO performance, and I also saw that you worked on a perl project to make copies of VMs, so therefore I address my question directly to you. Your work reminded me of something I read some weeks ago on qcow2 on http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/qcow-image-format.html and which raised my brows at the time: Snapshots - real snapshots - are represented in the original image itself. Each snapshot is a read-only record of the image a past instant. The original image remains writable and as modifications are made to it, a copy of the original data is made for any snapshots referring to it. I tried to find more info about this, but didn't yet. So here's my question: does anybody know whether, having made snapshots of a VM during several stages of its life (clean install, important service installed, ...), affects IO performance of any writes made after snapshotting, as one could suspect from my quote above? There is a difference between qcow2 snapshots and lvm snapshots. You probably want qcow2 snapshots in a typical testing scenario where you start from a good working virtual machine, snapshot it, break it, and then return to your snapshotted situation. I didn't do that yet. Last time I tried, the snapshotting itself hung libvirt, but that was a long time ago. Things might be better now. I have no idea about the resulting performance. They are both 'copy-on-write', so they might suffer from the same problems. I don't know if that's true, but it would be interesting to do some research here. The performance drop caused by LVM snapshots is the reason why I abandoned the project. I originally took the idea from our ZFS setup at work. We're using /a lot/ of ZFS snapshots. It's a success story. If I would ever take that away, the users would be at my door with torches and pitchforks. It's the single reason to still have dealings with Oracle support. So, I started using LVM snapshots at regular intervals. The script I wrote was for easier management and auto-mounting of the snapshots. It ended in disaster and halted production on the Ubuntu servers. The reason is that ZFS snapshots and LVM snapshots are too different. The ZFS faq states that you need about 1GB of RAM for every 10.000 filesystems. That includes snapshots, so that gives you an idea of the possibilities (and the different approach to filesystems). Even a single LVM snapshot can bring an Ubuntu server on its knees and can lead to a kernel panic given the right (in a manner of speaking) circumstances. It seemed a good idea at the time, but it will set fire to your daemons, hang your kernel and send your users screaming. I did file a little bug report[1]. Originally, I thought it was qemu-img, but qemu-img is just a good I/O stress test. You can also use rsync or simply cp to hang the kernel. What I currently do in the above testing scenario is copying the (offline) virtual machine, but I might try the qcow2 snapshots one day. Currently this is not possible because my test vm's run on logical volumes on RAID0. It speeds up the virtual machine itself, but the copying process is heavy and slow. Maybe btrfs will be the answer in the near future? [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712392 -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Puppet Integration
On 03/31/2011 10:36 AM, Chuck Short wrote: Puppet installs over apt-get and takes editing a quick /etc/default/puppet file to say YES to enable it (rather than risk conflicts) BTW this behavior is annoying, it should just rely on the normal methods i.e. update-rc.d puppet defaults -- Mark D. Foster m...@foster.cc http://mark.foster.cc/ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Puppet Integration
On 03/31/2011 11:52 AM, Mark Foster wrote: On 03/31/2011 10:36 AM, Chuck Short wrote: Puppet installs over apt-get and takes editing a quick /etc/default/puppet file to say YES to enable it (rather than risk conflicts) BTW this behavior is annoying, it should just rely on the normal methods i.e. update-rc.d puppet defaults That may be the normal method, but it's not the Ubuntu (debian?) way, which is to automatically do that on install, and start the application up. Personally I find that an annoying default, if for example, have to install an FTP server on a machine I don't want it starting up until I've had a chance to configure it first. Paul -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Puppet Integration
Excerpts from Mark Foster's message of Thu Mar 31 14:52:00 -0700 2011: On 03/31/2011 10:36 AM, Chuck Short wrote: Puppet installs over apt-get and takes editing a quick /etc/default/puppet file to say YES to enable it (rather than risk conflicts) BTW this behavior is annoying, it should just rely on the normal methods i.e. update-rc.d puppet defaults Agreed. Does anybody know why puppet does this? What conflicts are we talking about? -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
