[users@httpd] Build problem
Howdy; I'm new to the list, so this may allready be addressed somewhere. Basically, I', trying to put the sources for apache2 and php, etc., together, and I seem to be having some heavy wading. 1st off, I seem to have to go searching for every last part and piece of a project that by all accounts should have a site or two where everything is available for picking and choosing. Oh well, enough griping. The main problem of the moment, is APR-Util. After a bit of searchoong around, I finally found, apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg. I'm not sure what the, dfsg, is, but I figured I'd find out from the docs. Unfortunately, I'm not by any stretch of the imagination, a, C, programmer. Near as I can tell, C, stands for, Cuneiform. Consequently, when presented with error messages like the following, I'm at a complete loss. make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c', needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Anyone know how to fix this? TIA; Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
On 05/30/2012 07:06 AM, Bill Vance wrote: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c', needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Hello, It looks like you are trying to build against an old version of apr-util. Try apr-1.4.6 and apr-util-1.4.1. http://apr.apache.org/download.cgi Hope that helps, -Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?
--On 29 May 2012 16:02:25 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote: This was documented feature in 1.3 and 2.0: The complete list of names in the VirtualHost directive are treated just like a ServerAlias (but are not overridden by any ServerAlias statement) if all names resolve to the same address set. Note that subsequent Listen statements for this vhost will not affect the ports assigned in the address set. It seems that in 2.2 it should work as you expect. Do you still use 2.0 or does this problem apply in 2.2 too? (I've checked now and seems it's gone in 2.2) On 29.05.12 16:40, Alex Bligh wrote: I am using 2.2 (latest from Ubuntu Lucid). I am not sure how to parse your second paragraph. There is only one Listen statement as this is a NameVirtualHost (in this case a Listen for *:80). NameVirtualHost is on 192.200.0.1:80 because there are non-namebased virtual hosts on other IP addresses. it's not mine, but from apache 1.3/2.0 docs. I think what you are saying is that in 1.3 and 2.0 the first declared virtual host not only acts as the default virtual host but also as if it had an alias defined for the IP address/port pair it is listening on. Not the on it's listening on, but the one in VirtualHost section. It means than for VirtualHost some.na.me the some.na.me becomes a hidden alias of the virtualhost. So, when you define VirtualHost 192.168.0.1 /VirtualHost VirtualHost 192.168.0.1 ServerName 192.168.0.1 /VirtualHost the second won't apply for 192.168.0.1, because 192.168.0.1 is already alias (hidden) of the first (default) virtual host. My understanding from the documentation is that this is not the intended behaviour on 2.2 - i.e. each vhost should be responding only for its defined ServerAlias and ServerName, and if none match the default should be used. That does not /appear/ to be happening, so perhaps the behaviour has not changed from the 1.3/2.0 behaviour you describe. Is that meant to be the case? If so, is there any way around this? (i.e. so an arbitrary DNS name pointing to the IP address will get the default vhost, but the IP address itself will get a different vhost). I worked around this problem by defining fake name in NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost sections # some.na.me maps to 192.168.0.1 NameVirtualHost some.na.me NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.1 # some.na.me is not resolvable from outside, so this host will ONLY get # default hosts - unspecified below VirtualHost some.na.me ServerName some.na.me /VirtualHost # This host will only process requests for 192.168.0.1 VirtualHost 192.168.0.1 ServerName 192.168.0.1 /VirtualHost -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Microsoft dick is soft to do no harm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance p...@xpresso.seaslug.org wrote: I'm new to the list, so this may allready be addressed somewhere. Basically, I', trying to put the sources for apache2 and php, etc., together, and I seem to be having some heavy wading. Do you have a reason to want to build from source? For example, as a learning exercise, or because you will be modifying the code, or because you are using a very esoteric hardware platform? If the answer is no, consider getting both Apache and PHP pre-built from someone who has built it already for you -- preferably, your OS distributor (for example, if you are running a Red Hat Linux based OS, run the command sudo yum install httpd php to get everything), or a trusted group who provide a pre-packaged stack that contains both Apache and PHP ( see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apache%E2%80%93MySQL%E2%80%93PHP_packages ). Either way -- whether you get httpd and php pre-packaged or build it yourself -- it would be helpful to know what OS you're using. The main problem of the moment, is APR-Util. After a bit of searchoong around, I finally found, apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg. I'm not sure what the, dfsg, is, but I figured I'd find out from the docs. I have no idea what this is either. In general, it's not a good idea to use random thing you find lying around without knowing what they are, who they came from, and how they are special. The authoritative place to get the APR-Util source code is https://apr.apache.org/ If you need version 1.3.x for some reason, you can get it by clicking on the Download link in the Apache Portable Runtime Utility 1.4.1 Released section, then, on the resulting page, click on the Other files link in the APR-util 1.4.1 is the best available version section. However, a much better way, considering the directory path in the error message below is to go to http://httpd.apache.org/ and download both httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 and httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2. The former gets your the Apache HTTP Server source, and the latter gets you versions of the source code of both APR and APR-Util that are packaged to work with it. Unpack both into the same directory, like this: tar jxf httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 tar jxf httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2 The source for httpd will be in httpd-2.4.2 while the source for APR and APR-Utils will be in httpd-2.4.2/srclib (although you don't need to know this). Then follow the instructions at https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html (Be sure to read the paragraph about PCRE in the Requirements section!) make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c', needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Anyone know how to fix this? Since you're using a dubious version of APR-Util, I'm not even going to try. Please consider using a complete pre-packaged httpd+php stack as described at the top of this message. But if you are going to build this from source, try again using the instructions above. If you encounter problems, include the following information - What configure command you used - Any errors or warnings from the configure command. - What operating system you're using (e.g., Fedora 17), including version and platform-specific details (e.g., x86_64). Good luck. I hope this helps! -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] Problem with URL Rewriting
Hello, I have a problem with URL Rewriting.
I'm trying to transform URLs of the form :
http://medecine-et-enfance.net/archives/voir.html?file=J_2005_01_039.pdf
to
http://medecine-et-enfance.net/showpdf.html?file=J_2005_01_039.pdf
I have defined the following in the VirtualHost :
RewriteEngine on
RewriteLog /tmp/ecm3-rewrite.log
RewriteLogLevel 4
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING}
file=(.*)
RewriteRule ^/archives/voir.html
/showpdf.html?file=%1 [L]
RewriteRule (^/data/pdf/.*)
/showpdf.html?file=$1 [L]
This last line is to address a different case where users could get the files
directly
by requesting :
http://medecine-et-enfance.net/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf
Everything seems fine, if I look at the logs :
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2)
init rewrite engine with requested uri /archives/voir.html
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (3)
applying pattern '^/archives/voir.html' to uri '/archives/voir.html'
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (4)
RewriteCond: input='file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf' pattern='file=(.*)' =
matched
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2)
rewrite '/archives/voir.html' -
'/showpdf.html?file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf'
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (3) split
uri=/showpdf.html?file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf - uri=/showpdf.html,
args=file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2)
local path result: /showpdf.html
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2)
prefixed with document_root to /var/www/sites/ecm3/showpdf.html
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200]
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (1)
go-ahead with /var/www/sites/ecm3/showpdf.html [OK]
But I have put a spy in /archives/voir.html to see if the page is still being
called, and it is :
== /var/log/apache2/ecm/error.log ==
[Wed May 30 14:48:51 2012] [warn] [27627]ERR: 32: Warning in Perl code: Acces a
voir.html non filtre ! at //var/www/sites/ecm3/archives/voir.html line 20,
GEN0 line 4.
[Wed May 30 14:48:51 2012] [warn] [27627]ERR: 32: Warning in Perl code: showpdf:
/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf at /var/www/sites/ecm3/showpdf.html line 25, GEN0
line 4.
The users still can get the files using voir.html (though showpdf.html seems to
be called ?!)
Thanks for your help,
JC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to the logs. Apache 2.2 Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this? Thanks. Eric ___ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays offers premier investment banking products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. ___
[users@httpd] mod_jk vs. mod_proxy_ajp
anyone have a recommendation and differences? can I get precompiles of mok_jk somewhere for Sun Solaris?
Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
have you set is as OFF in - IfModule mod_weblogic.c ... /IfModule If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after removing all sensitive information). On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: I’ve set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it’s still writing to the logs. Apache 2.2 Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this? Thanks. Eric ___ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays offers premier investment banking products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
RE: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
Thanks for your reply, Ishita. All of the Debug statements are set to OFF. I have one major question at this point: Are the mod_wl directives scoped local to the IfModule and Directory|Location|LocationMatch sections in which they appear? We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests that I have noticed in the wl logs are from this section: LocationMatch /PNT/Indices IfModule mod_weblogic.c WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc. Debug OFF DebugConfigInfo OFF SetHandler weblogic-handler PathTrim /PNT/Indices WLCookieNamePST_JSESSIONID WLLogFile wl.log /IfModule /LocationMatch Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is causing the logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug? Eric -Original Message- From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging. have you set is as OFF in - IfModule mod_weblogic.c ... /IfModule If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after removing all sensitive information). On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to the logs. Apache 2.2 Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this? Thanks. Eric ___ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays offers premier investment banking products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error
Thanks Nick. I have compiled Apache for myself both the time and both are 32-bit. The same modules all other instances are using and thus i am not sure what is different with this instance that causing Segmentation fault error. I tried to dig more into it and here is what i got - mdb core ::stack libc.so.1`_read+0xc(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18(d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) child_main+0x2d4(0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) make_child+0x128(9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) ap_mpm_run+0x740(fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) main+0x77c(a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) _start+0x5c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) pstack core fef45874 _read(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) + c 0006b714 ap_mpm_pod_check (d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) + 18 000697b4 child_main (0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) + 2d4 00069930 make_child (9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) + 128 0006a160 ap_mpm_run (fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) + 740 00029bc8 main (a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) + 77c 00028f7c _start (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 5c pmap core 0001 448K r-x-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 0008 32K r-x-- 00096000 24K rwx-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 0009C000 16K rwx-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 000A6528K rwx--[ heap ] FAB7A000 8K rw---[ stack tid=36 ] ... (removed rest of the lines to avoid length) mdb /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd ::dis ap_mpm_pod_check!head ap_mpm_pod_check: save %sp, -0x78, %sp ap_mpm_pod_check+4: ld[%i0], %o1 ap_mpm_pod_check+8: call +0x2d0e0 PLT:apr_os_file_get ap_mpm_pod_check+0xc: add %fp, -0x14, %o0 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x10: ld[%fp - 0x14], %o0 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x14: add %fp, -0x15, %o1 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18: call +0x2cdc4 PLT:read ap_mpm_pod_check+0x1c: mov 1, %o2 Please help me what could be the problem? It's affecting my production env and i really don't know what to do next? On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote: On 29 May 2012, at 23:11, Ishita Kapadiya wrote: Hi All, I am using this configurations - Solaris sparc 10/apache 2.2.22/openssl 1.0.0g/simteminder sso/mod-jk 1.30 Did you compile everything yourself? If yes, could any compile options have changed? E.g. between 32-bit and 64-bit, or something less obvious but just as important? If no, what suppliers do your binaries come from, and have you checked with them? -- Nick Kew - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
Hi Eric, yes. mod_wl directives scoped local to the IfModule and Directory|Location|LocationMatch sections in which they appear. It's good idea to see default configuration for WL plug-in with - “__WebLogicBridgeConfig” (you also need to set DebugConfigInfo ON) and check if Debug is ON by default. in that case you have to explicitly set it OFF in each section where wl config present. Thanks On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: Thanks for your reply, Ishita. All of the Debug statements are set to OFF. I have one major question at this point: Are the mod_wl directives scoped local to the IfModule and Directory|Location|LocationMatch sections in which they appear? We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests that I have noticed in the wl logs are from this section: LocationMatch /PNT/Indices IfModule mod_weblogic.c WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc. Debug OFF DebugConfigInfo OFF SetHandler weblogic-handler PathTrim /PNT/Indices WLCookieName PST_JSESSIONID WLLogFile wl.log /IfModule /LocationMatch Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is causing the logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug? Eric -Original Message- From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging. have you set is as OFF in - IfModule mod_weblogic.c ... /IfModule If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after removing all sensitive information). On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to the logs. Apache 2.2 Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this? Thanks. Eric ___ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays offers premier investment banking products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
RE: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
Thanks, Ishita. That's very helpful. Do you know where the scoping issue is mentioned in the WL docs, or is it an apache thing? The thing is that every single wl config section has Debug OFF, and it's still logging to those wl files. When you suggest that logging might be on by default, where would that be set, and why doesn't the setting of Debug to OFF affect this? I'll try enabling DebugConfigInfo and see what I get. Eric -Original Message- From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:42 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging. Hi Eric, yes. mod_wl directives scoped local to the IfModule and Directory|Location|LocationMatch sections in which they appear. It's good idea to see default configuration for WL plug-in with - __WebLogicBridgeConfig (you also need to set DebugConfigInfo ON) and check if Debug is ON by default. in that case you have to explicitly set it OFF in each section where wl config present. Thanks On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: Thanks for your reply, Ishita. All of the Debug statements are set to OFF. I have one major question at this point: Are the mod_wl directives scoped local to the IfModule and Directory|Location|LocationMatch sections in which they appear? We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests that I have noticed in the wl logs are from this section: LocationMatch /PNT/Indices IfModule mod_weblogic.c WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc. Debug OFF DebugConfigInfo OFF SetHandler weblogic-handler PathTrim /PNT/Indices WLCookieName PST_JSESSIONID WLLogFile wl.log /IfModule /LocationMatch Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is causing the logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug? Eric -Original Message- From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging. have you set is as OFF in - IfModule mod_weblogic.c ... /IfModule If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after removing all sensitive information). On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to the logs. Apache 2.2 Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this? Thanks. Eric ___ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays offers premier investment banking products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
Hi Eric, You can refer http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/plugins/apache.html. consider other two scenarios - 1) there is no other instance on the server than had Debug ON 2) grep the wl log file name in apache config which will provide you clue with that set of config. Thanks On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:45 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: Thanks, Ishita. That's very helpful. Do you know where the scoping issue is mentioned in the WL docs, or is it an apache thing? The thing is that every single wl config section has Debug OFF, and it's still logging to those wl files. When you suggest that logging might be on by default, where would that be set, and why doesn't the setting of Debug to OFF affect this? I'll try enabling DebugConfigInfo and see what I get. Eric -Original Message- From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:42 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging. Hi Eric, yes. mod_wl directives scoped local to the IfModule and Directory|Location|LocationMatch sections in which they appear. It's good idea to see default configuration for WL plug-in with - __WebLogicBridgeConfig (you also need to set DebugConfigInfo ON) and check if Debug is ON by default. in that case you have to explicitly set it OFF in each section where wl config present. Thanks On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: Thanks for your reply, Ishita. All of the Debug statements are set to OFF. I have one major question at this point: Are the mod_wl directives scoped local to the IfModule and Directory|Location|LocationMatch sections in which they appear? We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests that I have noticed in the wl logs are from this section: LocationMatch /PNT/Indices IfModule mod_weblogic.c WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc. Debug OFF DebugConfigInfo OFF SetHandler weblogic-handler PathTrim /PNT/Indices WLCookieName PST_JSESSIONID WLLogFile wl.log /IfModule /LocationMatch Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is causing the logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug? Eric -Original Message- From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging. have you set is as OFF in - IfModule mod_weblogic.c ... /IfModule If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after removing all sensitive information). On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, eric.b...@barclays.com wrote: I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to the logs. Apache 2.2 Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this? Thanks. Eric ___ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays offers premier investment banking products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] virtual hosts with different JkExtract ssl values
Thanks for the help! As silly as this sounds, I thought i had tried the scenario I had above and that it hadn't worked but after I read the documentation you sent, it didn't explicitly specify that JkExtract could not be used in a virtual host so I tried it and it worked! Thanks, Charles On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote: JkExtractSSL is On by default. You can read the JkExtractSSL definition in the connector documentation: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/printer/apache.html Looks like you can play with Apache SSLOptions parameter: In order to make SSL data available for mod_jk in Apache, you need to set *SSLOptions +StdEnvVars*. For the certificate information you also need to add *SSLOptions +ExportCertData*. and enable the above settings only for the Vhost you need it for. Igor On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Charles Richard chachi.rich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a bit of a complex setup in which i need a same front end apache server to use different virtual hosts name (wildcard SSL) to redirect to either Liferay, Glassfish or Tomcat. This could be a misconfiguration on my part but I seem to need for my regular tomcat server that JkExtractSSL be on and for the other 2 (Liferay, Glassfish) that my JkExtractSSL be off. Is there a way to do this in a virtual host directive? Example: virtual host app1.mydomain.com JkExtractSSL on /virtual host virtual host app2.mydomain.com JkExtractSSL off /virtual host Thanks, Charles
[users@httpd] Compiling/Installing httpd 2.4.2 on AIX 6.1 with gcc/g++
My browser tells me that It Works! but it took a couple days of banging my head against the wall. I encountered the following rough spots and eventually stumbled over their solutions as noted: 1) No libpcre This is a pre-requisite for httpd, I did not have it. I downloaded version 8.30 from www.pcre.orghttp://www.pcre.org. The configure script ran OK, but the make failed with errors about libgcc missing, even though 'rpm -aq' indicated it was present. It was necessary to remove all the gcc, g++, and libstdc packages via 'rpm -e', and then install them again in the following order: libgcc-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm libstdcplusplus-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm libstdcplusplus-devel-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm gcc-cplusplus-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm These packages are all downloadable at: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/software/aix/linux/toolbox/alpha.html My 'rpm -aq' listing now includes: libgcc-4.2.0-3 gcc-4.2.0-3 libstdc++-4.2.0-3 gcc-c++-4.2.0-3 libstdc++-devel-4.2.0-3 But I did NOT install any separate gcc-4.2.0-3 RPM, I think it just came along with the gcc-c++ package. Originally I had installed a separate gcc package, and I think that messed up the interface with libgcc. 2) Apache 'make install' fails with install: File mod_authn_file.so was not found. This issue is discussed at length on the mailing list archives at: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAN9c_NSp8D9ifhb0FgSmfyKHqfQSFrmwuj+5przNZpqmp7v=z...@mail.gmail.com%3E but I did not see a resolution for it. Recommendations for work-arounds included compiling and installing the apache apr sopftware as a separate package, using an explicitly declared destination directory when running make install, and some other suggestions that I did not understand. None of them worked for me. Instead, what make the install work for me was a suggestion from the README in the build/aix subdirectory. The scripts there are supposed to build an AIX installp package for apache. I didn't try it, but they said that libtool did not work well with the AIX 'install' program, and to use the GNU one instead. I already had the GNU coreutils installed (also available from the above IBM site), so I set the PATH so that 'which install' returned /opt/freeware/bin/install. After this, 'make install' ran just fine, and httpd runs for me and serves out the test page. I had already separated out the 'apr' stuff and installed it in /usr/local/apr and compiled apache separately, but out of curiosity I started over again, unpacking both httpd and httpd-deps into the same directory and running 'configure' with the -with-included-apr option, and that installed and runs just fine, too! George _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Re: [users@httpd] Compiling/Installing httpd 2.4.2 on AIX 6.1 with gcc/g++
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Reimer, George george.rei...@fisglobal.com wrote: My browser tells me that “It Works!” but it took a couple days of banging my head against the wall. I encountered the following rough spots and eventually stumbled over their solutions as noted: can you share your gcc experience here in the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/AIXPlatform - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?
--On 30 May 2012 14:41:53 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote: I worked around this problem by defining fake name in NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost sections # some.na.me maps to 192.168.0.1 NameVirtualHost some.na.me NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.1 # some.na.me is not resolvable from outside, so this host will ONLY get # # default hosts - unspecified below VirtualHost some.na.me ServerName some.na.me /VirtualHost # This host will only process requests for 192.168.0.1 VirtualHost 192.168.0.1 ServerName 192.168.0.1 /VirtualHost OK, so it is the VirtualHost some.na.me that is fixing this (really) not the ServerName some.na.me line. I'm already doing the latter: ServerName default.example.com My problem is this is an automated install system and (broadly speaking) I have no control over DNS. Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as a hex constant or something in VirtualHost? Or disable this rather annoying feature? -- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?
Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as a hex constant or something in VirtualHost? Or disable this rather annoying feature? I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen with the literal IP address in the virtualHost arguments and that it works with *:80. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error
You didn't dump the offending stack, you dumped the first stack. It's highly unlikely there was a segfault in _read. You need to dump all the thread stacks, and work out the offending one; this is usuallly designated FAULT or some other indication of where the fault occured. On 5/30/2012 10:32 AM, Ishita Kapadiya wrote: Thanks Nick. I have compiled Apache for myself both the time and both are 32-bit. The same modules all other instances are using and thus i am not sure what is different with this instance that causing Segmentation fault error. I tried to dig more into it and here is what i got - mdb core ::stack libc.so.1`_read+0xc(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18(d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) child_main+0x2d4(0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) make_child+0x128(9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) ap_mpm_run+0x740(fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) main+0x77c(a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) _start+0x5c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) pstack core fef45874 _read(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) + c 0006b714 ap_mpm_pod_check (d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) + 18 000697b4 child_main (0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) + 2d4 00069930 make_child (9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) + 128 0006a160 ap_mpm_run (fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) + 740 00029bc8 main (a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) + 77c 00028f7c _start (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 5c pmap core 0001 448K r-x-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 0008 32K r-x-- 00096000 24K rwx-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 0009C000 16K rwx-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 000A6528K rwx--[ heap ] FAB7A000 8K rw---[ stack tid=36 ] ... (removed rest of the lines to avoid length) mdb /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd ::dis ap_mpm_pod_check!head ap_mpm_pod_check: save %sp, -0x78, %sp ap_mpm_pod_check+4: ld[%i0], %o1 ap_mpm_pod_check+8: call +0x2d0e0 PLT:apr_os_file_get ap_mpm_pod_check+0xc: add %fp, -0x14, %o0 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x10: ld[%fp - 0x14], %o0 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x14: add %fp, -0x15, %o1 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18: call +0x2cdc4 PLT:read ap_mpm_pod_check+0x1c: mov 1, %o2 Please help me what could be the problem? It's affecting my production env and i really don't know what to do next? On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote: On 29 May 2012, at 23:11, Ishita Kapadiya wrote: Hi All, I am using this configurations - Solaris sparc 10/apache 2.2.22/openssl 1.0.0g/simteminder sso/mod-jk 1.30 Did you compile everything yourself? If yes, could any compile options have changed? E.g. between 32-bit and 64-bit, or something less obvious but just as important? If no, what suppliers do your binaries come from, and have you checked with them? -- Nick Kew - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote: Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400 From: Mark Montague m...@catseye.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance p...@xpresso.seaslug.org wrote: I'm new to the list, so this may allready be addressed somewhere. Basically, I', trying to put the sources for apache2 and php, etc., together, and I seem to be having some heavy wading. Do you have a reason to want to build from source? For example, as a learning exercise, or because you will be modifying the code, or because you are using a very esoteric hardware platform? Well it seems to be the way everyones been discussing how to do it, what with aspx being AWOL or whatever. That plus whenever I get things working, there's a bunch of other stuff I want to add, as well. If the answer is no, consider getting both Apache and PHP pre-built from someone who has built it already for you -- preferably, your OS distributor (for example, if you are running a Red Hat Linux based OS, run the command sudo yum install httpd php to get everything), or a trusted group who provide a pre-packaged stack that contains both Apache and PHP ( see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apache%E2%80%93MySQL%E2%80%93PHP_packages ). Actually I'm running KUbuntu 10.04, Lucid Lunatic, or Lynx, or whatever that stupid name is, on an i386-32 One of the problems here are utils like apt-get, aptitude, and synaptic, etc. They work real good if you only want to deal with .deb archives, but don't seem to leave much in the way of a program directory behind them, which some things require for working with them. Either way -- whether you get httpd and php pre-packaged or build it yourself -- it would be helpful to know what OS you're using. Actually I just tried your pre-package suggestion, and PHP5 started complaining about deprecated, #'s on line 0 in it's /etc/* files, and apache2 quit working at all. I'll give it another go with your further suggestions below, and see what happens. The main problem of the moment, is APR-Util. After a bit of searchoong around, I finally found, apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg. I'm not sure what the, dfsg, is, but I figured I'd find out from the docs. I have no idea what this is either. In general, it's not a good idea to use random thing you find lying around without knowing what they are, who they came from, and how they are special. The authoritative place to get the APR-Util source code is https://apr.apache.org/ If you need version 1.3.x for some reason, you can get it by clicking on the Download link in the Apache Portable Runtime Utility 1.4.1 Released section, then, on the resulting page, click on the Other files link in the APR-util 1.4.1 is the best available version section. However, a much better way, considering the directory path in the error message below is to go to http://httpd.apache.org/ and download both httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 and httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2. The former gets your the Apache HTTP Server source, and the latter gets you versions of the source code of both APR and APR-Util that are packaged to work with it. Unpack both into the same directory, like this: tar jxf httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 tar jxf httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2 The source for httpd will be in httpd-2.4.2 while the source for APR and APR-Utils will be in httpd-2.4.2/srclib (although you don't need to know this). Then follow the instructions at https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html (Be sure to read the paragraph about PCRE in the Requirements section!) make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c', needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Anyone know how to fix this? Since you're using a dubious version of APR-Util, I'm not even going to try. Please consider using a complete pre-packaged httpd+php stack as described at the top of this message. But if you are going to build this from source, try again using the instructions above. If you encounter problems, include the following information - What configure command you used - Any errors or warnings from the configure command. - What operating system you're using (e.g., Fedora 17), including version and platform-specific details (e.g., x86_64). Good luck. I hope this helps! -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error
Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got dumped. Also, when i google ap_mpm_pod_check then got to know that there are lots of people who hits Apache bug. Please refer this URL - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/bugs/414768 Also, i ran pfiles against the core file and i got data model = _ILP32 flags = MSACCT|MSFORK /1:flags = 0 sigmask = 0xbeff,0x cursig = SIGSEGV /2:defunct /3:flags = STOPPED lwp_park(0x4,0x0,0x0) why = PR_SUSPENDED sigmask = 0xffbe6007,0xfff7 .. (rest of lines truncted) I don't know much about debugging as i am not from developer background but whatever o/p i got, looks like some bug with Apache 2.2.22. Please revert. On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: You didn't dump the offending stack, you dumped the first stack. It's highly unlikely there was a segfault in _read. You need to dump all the thread stacks, and work out the offending one; this is usuallly designated FAULT or some other indication of where the fault occured. On 5/30/2012 10:32 AM, Ishita Kapadiya wrote: Thanks Nick. I have compiled Apache for myself both the time and both are 32-bit. The same modules all other instances are using and thus i am not sure what is different with this instance that causing Segmentation fault error. I tried to dig more into it and here is what i got - mdb core ::stack libc.so.1`_read+0xc(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18(d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) child_main+0x2d4(0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) make_child+0x128(9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) ap_mpm_run+0x740(fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) main+0x77c(a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) _start+0x5c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) pstack core fef45874 _read (6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) + c 0006b714 ap_mpm_pod_check (d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) + 18 000697b4 child_main (0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) + 2d4 00069930 make_child (9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) + 128 0006a160 ap_mpm_run (fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) + 740 00029bc8 main (a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) + 77c 00028f7c _start (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 5c pmap core 0001 448K r-x-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 0008 32K r-x-- 00096000 24K rwx-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 0009C000 16K rwx-- /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd 000A 6528K rwx-- [ heap ] FAB7A000 8K rw--- [ stack tid=36 ] ... (removed rest of the lines to avoid length) mdb /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd ::dis ap_mpm_pod_check!head ap_mpm_pod_check: save %sp, -0x78, %sp ap_mpm_pod_check+4: ld [%i0], %o1 ap_mpm_pod_check+8: call +0x2d0e0 PLT:apr_os_file_get ap_mpm_pod_check+0xc: add %fp, -0x14, %o0 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x10: ld [%fp - 0x14], %o0 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x14: add %fp, -0x15, %o1 ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18: call +0x2cdc4 PLT:read ap_mpm_pod_check+0x1c: mov 1, %o2 Please help me what could be the problem? It's affecting my production env and i really don't know what to do next? On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote: On 29 May 2012, at 23:11, Ishita Kapadiya wrote: Hi All, I am using this configurations - Solaris sparc 10/apache 2.2.22/openssl 1.0.0g/simteminder sso/mod-jk 1.30 Did you compile everything yourself? If yes, could any compile options have changed? E.g. between 32-bit and 64-bit, or something less obvious but just as important? If no, what suppliers do your binaries come from, and have you checked with them? -- Nick Kew - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote: Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400 From: Mark Montague m...@catseye.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem However, a much better way, considering the directory path in the error message below is to go to http://httpd.apache.org/ and download both httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 and httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2. The former gets your the Apache HTTP Server source, and the latter gets you versions of the source code of both APR and APR-Util that are packaged to work with it. Unpack both into the same directory, like this: tar jxf httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 tar jxf httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2 Well, I tried it, but ./configure died with: checking for tm_gmtoff in struct tm... yes adding -DAPR_DTRACE_PROVIDER to CPPFLAGS configure: error: 'DTrace Support in the build system is not complete. Patches Welcome!' Ok, so now what do I do? Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ishita Kapadiya ishim...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got dumped. Also, when i google ap_mpm_pod_check then got to know that there are lots of people who hits Apache bug. It means lots of people post about the first thread that shows up in gdb/dbx/pstack -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
On May 30, 2012 17:28 , Bill Vance p...@xpresso.seaslug.org wrote: Actually I'm running KUbuntu 10.04, Lucid Lunatic, or Lynx, or whatever that stupid name is, on an i386-32 One of the problems here are utils like apt-get, aptitude, and synaptic, etc. So load a fresh KUbuntu system -- at this point, I think you may have made enough changes to your current system that it might be difficult to get things to work -- and then do a web search for apache kubuntu. Here are some of the top search results, which seem to have simple, straightforward instructions for your particular situation: http://phpweby.com/node/21 https://rockmanx.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/installing-ubuntus-apache2-local-webserver/ They work real good if you only want to deal with .deb archives, but don't seem to leave much in the way of a program directory behind them, which some things require for working with them. I don't understand this statement at all. Program directory? Require for working with them? Normally you'd install a package and get some configuration files and startup scripts under /etc, some binaries under /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, and web pages under /var/www. Customize your config file (set the server name, etc.), drop in your content or web application under /var/www, start the service, and you're up and running. Actually I just tried your pre-package suggestion, and PHP5 started complaining about deprecated, #'s on line 0 in it's /etc/* files, and apache2 quit working at all. This isn't enough information to help you. You don't say which one pre-packaged Apache+PHP distribution you picked, how you installed it, what changes you made, nor what you tried that resulted in PHP complaining. In any event, now that we know you're running on KUbuntu, I'd recommend not downloading a separate non-Ubuntu LAMP stack, but instead using what Kubuntu provides -- it's the easiest and most standard thing to do in your specific situation. Also, take things in stages: get Apache HTTP Server set up and serving static content first, then try getting PHP running. If you have trouble with PHP inside the web server, then try running a PHP script from the command line -- if you can't get PHP to run from the command line, it will never run from inside the web server. But, again, I suspect that you likely have several things that are messed up on your system from your previous attempts at installing and getting things working. Start over with a fresh KUbuntu installation if possible. If it's not possible to reload the system you've been working on, consider setting up a VM guest system in which to experiment and learn and get things working, which you can reload as many times as needed. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error
Hi Eric, could you please let me know the next steps to mitigate Segfault error.. On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ishita Kapadiya ishim...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got dumped. Also, when i google ap_mpm_pod_check then got to know that there are lots of people who hits Apache bug. It means lots of people post about the first thread that shows up in gdb/dbx/pstack -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
At 02:28 PM 5/30/2012 -0700, Bill Vance wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote: Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400 From: Mark Montague m...@catseye.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance p...@xpresso.seaslug.org wrote: I'm new to the list, so this may allready be addressed somewhere. Basically, I', trying to put the sources for apache2 and php, etc., together, and I seem to be having some heavy wading. [snip] Actually I'm running KUbuntu 10.04, Lucid Lunatic, or Lynx, or whatever that stupid name is, on an i386-32 One of the problems here are utils like apt-get, aptitude, and synaptic, etc. They work real good if you only want to deal with .deb archives, but don't seem to leave much in the way of a program directory behind them, which some things require for working with them. Not sure why you need KDE for a server, but... Maybe 10.04 is a bit long in the tooth? I just rebuilt (Monday afternoon) from scratch an old i386-32 as a sandbox using Ubuntu 12.04 (the latest LTS), and had Apache 2.2.22 and PHP 5.3.10 (as well as MySQL 5.5.22) up and running in less than an hour. I used apt-get for each package (wanted MySQL, not Postgre which comes in the standard LAMP package available at installation time from the standard .iso). The Ubuntu stupid name for 12.04 is Precise; maybe for you it would be Perfect? HTH - Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:11:51PM -0400, Stormy wrote: Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:11:51 -0400 From: Stormy storm...@stormy.ca Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem [snip] Not sure why you need KDE for a server, but... Maybe 10.04 is a bit long in the tooth? I just rebuilt (Monday afternoon) from scratch an old i386-32 as a sandbox using Ubuntu 12.04 (the latest LTS), and had Apache 2.2.22 and PHP 5.3.10 (as well as MySQL 5.5.22) up and running in less than an hour. I used apt-get for each package (wanted MySQL, not Postgre which comes in the standard LAMP package available at installation time from the standard .iso). 12.04 being just out, is having the usual KUbuntu string of startup nightmares, so I think I'll pass on that one. If I do a new OS at all, What I'm considering is CentOS. That I'm hearing, is a deal more reliable than a bunch of other systems. Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as a hex constant or something in VirtualHost? Or disable this rather annoying feature? I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen with the literal IP address in the virtualHost arguments and that it works with *:80. Sorry, just catching on now that Matus nailed it. It's not so clear what the code is trying to tolerate by comparing this way. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as a hex constant or something in VirtualHost? Or disable this rather annoying feature? I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen with the literal IP address in the virtualHost arguments and that it works with *:80. Sorry, just catching on now that Matus nailed it. It's not so clear what the code is trying to tolerate by comparing this way. docs bug: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53334 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
