Re: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.18.3-1.fc23.x86_64
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Gordon Messmerwrote: > Is anyone else having trouble with > xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.18.3-1.fc23.x86_64? > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cebdf579ca > > I updated this morning, and with that update applied, when I lock the > session and my monitors shut off, the system takes a very long time (which > varies, but 15 seconds seems like a minimum) to turn them back on and show a > password prompt. The logs also indicate that Xorg triggered the OOM killer > and terminated my session while I was out to lunch. > > When I revert to an earlier Xorg package, the system works normally. On Radeon, I'm not seeing this. Haven't tried i915. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 23 multiple CPU cooling/temp errors every day
It's also worth installing and running powertop -c which can be done either on battery power or not, and it'll set some better power states on various things. It may not make the fan run less or CPU less warm, but it'll still use less power. There are a bunch of powertop guides floating about. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf and yum caches
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:45:23AM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 04/13/2016 07:40 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > >Thank you for all the comments. > > > >What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that > >it's the files in > > > >/var/cache/yum/x86_64/22 > > > >that are being updated even though I use dnf to do the update. They show > >the current date of my last update. > > No, that's expected. The idea is you have lots of stuff in the > /var/cache//x86_64/<19|20|21> directories left over from the > PREVIOUS versions of the system is what I was trying to infer. A > > du -hs /var/cache/* > > would reveal it. My machine at home had tons of stuff from the F18, > F19, F20, F21 and F22 incarnations of the system (yes, that poor beast > has been upgraded many, MANY times). > > >I'll go ahead and rm -rf the yum and dnf directories and see what happens. > > That's the quick way to do it. I was trying to emphasize using the tool > itself to clean things up, but that's just as effective and probably > easier. How do you address the remaining F18...F2x packages. Which should be, can safely be, and shouldn't be removed? My system also was upgraded many times. There are lots of older distro packages still installed. One I got rid of was bootchart from F18. It prevented my complete upgrade to F22. Stimulated by this thread I looked at the still installed old packages. Gee, F-spot from F18. Who knew it was dead? That pkg is gone now. But what about things like 4 packages named "Fedora-UserManagement-*"? Are they still needed? Were they ever? Are they no longer updated because they have morphed into something else? And what about "hardinfo". Wonder if the F18 version still runs. Yup, looks like a useful inventory tool. Wonder why its no longer available. Not really looking for answers to these specific questions. Just wondering how other people deal with decision making, "should they stay of should they go"? jl -- Jon H. LaBadie jo...@jgcomp.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: "Brave" new browser
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:22:02PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > But I was wondering: is the license appropriate enough to bring to > Fedora? The license is Mozilla Public License Version 2.0 and is > attached. MPL v2.0 is definitely on our list of "Fedora good licenses": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses There may be other issues, including patented codecs or other barriers. -- Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: ssh-agent not working after upgrade to fedora 23
On 04/13/2016 01:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:51:31 -0400 Richard Heck wrote: Any suggestions? Yep. The security geeks decided dsa keys weren't secure, but none of the errors messages you get give you a hint that dsa keys no longer work. You can change a lot of obscure parameters in /etc/sshd.config (and maybe /etc/ssh.config as well) or you can sigh and generate new keys using an "acceptable" cipher and distribute the new public key around to every single system that has your old dsa key. You can use "ssh -o HostkeyAlgorithms +ssh-dss remotehost" to temporarily use dsa keys, or add Host * HostkeyAlgorithms +ssh-dss to your /etc/ssh/ssh_config or ~/.ssh/config file, but switch to rsa when you can. The "experts" think its better and by default, ssh won't use dss any more. Also be aware that by default ssh no longer allows diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 key exchange. Again, you can "ssh -o KexAlgorithms +diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 remotehost" or add Host * KexAlgorithms +diffie-hellman-group1-sha to your /etc/ssh/ssh_config or ~/.ssh/config files. Both of these have gotten me trying to log into some older Cisco routers. I've added things like Host remote-cisco-gear HostkeyAlgorithms +ssh-dss KexAlgorithms +diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 for each of these problematic machines to my ~/.ssh/config file to get around these issues. G! -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once. - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: 389 directory server console and httpd.worker process
The console can run from anywhere, but each Directory Server system needs an admin server. Host A - Just 389-console Host B - DS instance and Admin Server Host C - DS instance A, DS instance B, and Admin Server etc, etc You can cross register all the systems and use console to administer all the Directory Server instances from one location(using the latest register-ds-admin.pl) Mark On 04/13/2016 03:18 PM, xinhuan zheng wrote: With that explanation, if I install console into a server different than the server the directory server instance runs on, while Admin Server (http) is installed on the server the directory server runs on, is it possible? In another words, can console be separate installation into another server so from one console it can control multiple directory server instances? - xinhuan -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
"Brave" new browser
Hi, I recently became aware of a new browser called "Brave" which ditches ads (www.brave.com) or pays you to watch them and have been using it for a couple of days now. It is certainly faster than Firefox which is a great browser but freezes quite a bit. But I was wondering: is the license appropriate enough to bring to Fedora? The license is Mozilla Public License Version 2.0 and is attached. Many thanks and best wishes, Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click. Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out! Mozilla Public License Version 2.0 == 1. Definitions -- 1.1. "Contributor" means each individual or legal entity that creates, contributes to the creation of, or owns Covered Software. 1.2. "Contributor Version" means the combination of the Contributions of others (if any) used by a Contributor and that particular Contributor's Contribution. 1.3. "Contribution" means Covered Software of a particular Contributor. 1.4. "Covered Software" means Source Code Form to which the initial Contributor has attached the notice in Exhibit A, the Executable Form of such Source Code Form, and Modifications of such Source Code Form, in each case including portions thereof. 1.5. "Incompatible With Secondary Licenses" means (a) that the initial Contributor has attached the notice described in Exhibit B to the Covered Software; or (b) that the Covered Software was made available under the terms of version 1.1 or earlier of the License, but not also under the terms of a Secondary License. 1.6. "Executable Form" means any form of the work other than Source Code Form. 1.7. "Larger Work" means a work that combines Covered Software with other material, in a separate file or files, that is not Covered Software. 1.8. "License" means this document. 1.9. "Licensable" means having the right to grant, to the maximum extent possible, whether at the time of the initial grant or subsequently, any and all of the rights conveyed by this License. 1.10. "Modifications" means any of the following: (a) any file in Source Code Form that results from an addition to, deletion from, or modification of the contents of Covered Software; or (b) any new file in Source Code Form that contains any Covered Software. 1.11. "Patent Claims" of a Contributor means any patent claim(s), including without limitation, method, process, and apparatus claims, in any patent Licensable by such Contributor that would be infringed, but for the grant of the License, by the making, using, selling, offering for sale, having made, import, or transfer of either its Contributions or its Contributor Version. 1.12. "Secondary License" means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0, the GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1, the GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3.0, or any later versions of those licenses. 1.13. "Source Code Form" means the form of the work preferred for making modifications. 1.14. "You" (or "Your") means an individual or a legal entity exercising rights under this License. For legal entities, "You" includes any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with You. For purposes of this definition, "control" means (a) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (b) ownership of more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares or beneficial ownership of such entity. 2. License Grants and Conditions 2.1. Grants Each Contributor hereby grants You a world-wide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license: (a) under intellectual property rights (other than patent or trademark) Licensable by such Contributor to use, reproduce, make available, modify, display, perform, distribute, and otherwise exploit its Contributions, either on an unmodified basis, with Modifications, or as part of a Larger Work; and (b) under Patent Claims of such Contributor to make, use, sell, offer for sale, have made, import, and otherwise transfer either its Contributions or its Contributor Version. 2.2. Effective Date The licenses granted in Section 2.1 with respect to any Contribution become effective for each Contribution on the date the Contributor first distributes such Contribution. 2.3. Limitations on Grant Scope The licenses granted in this
Re: Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
On 04/13/2016 12:24 PM, Greg Woods wrote: If you're using NAT, then all the connections to the Samba server will appear to come from the same IP, which may confuse things. I think the root of the problem is that SMB creates a browse master for each subnet. Since the Samba server and the Windows workstation were on different subnets, each elected itself the browse master. The F23 workstation was on both, so it used the Windows system as its browse master (though I'm not sure how that selection is normally made when more than one is available). As a result, it would only be able to browse to hosts registered with the Windows 10 VM. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: ssh-agent not working after upgrade to fedora 23
On 04/13/2016 01:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: The security geeks decided dsa keys weren't secure Do you mean "the security experts who maintain OpenSSH and OpenBSD?" http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.0 But, yeah, the release notes are light on details. I recommend this document to SSH users: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Guidelines/OpenSSH -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: journalctl/rsyslog pause/delay while logging
The problem turned out to be remote logging to a host that was down for a while. After disabling the remote logging to a host that was no longer available, logging no longer blocked. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Alexwrote: > Hi, > > I have a fedora23 mail server that's been working for quite some time. > I have rsyslog installed and configured to log mail to > /var/log/maillog. It's never had a problem, but for some reason > yesterday it started intermittently stop logging for about three > minutes, then catch up with the three minutes of missed data before it > begins to log normally again. > > It then appears to log for another few minutes, then repeat this cycle. > > Looking at the logs with "journalctl -f" shows no such lag with > logging, but I can't use journalctl for this project. > > Any idea what could be causing this? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.18.3-1.fc23.x86_64
Is anyone else having trouble with xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.18.3-1.fc23.x86_64? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cebdf579ca I updated this morning, and with that update applied, when I lock the session and my monitors shut off, the system takes a very long time (which varies, but 15 seconds seems like a minimum) to turn them back on and show a password prompt. The logs also indicate that Xorg triggered the OOM killer and terminated my session while I was out to lunch. When I revert to an earlier Xorg package, the system works normally. # lspci | grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Chris Murphywrote > > Thwarted. The Windows 10 Media Creation Tool, from Microsoft, does not > use an already downloaded ISO. It downloads a new copy, apparently > each time you want to create a stick. There are 3rd party USB creation > tools but I have no real interesting in effectively testing whether > those tools will properly create a USB stick for UEFI computers. It's funny and annoying how I made this more difficult than necessary. I just formatted a USB stick, MBR + FAT32, and then copied the files from the ISO/UDF (mounted with Gnome Disk Image Mounter) over. And guess what? The Intel NUC boots it just fine, in UEFI mode, with Secure Boot. So now I can move onto bug 1320273. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: ssh-agent not working after upgrade to fedora 23
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:51:31 -0400 Richard Heck wrote: > Any suggestions? Yep. The security geeks decided dsa keys weren't secure, but none of the errors messages you get give you a hint that dsa keys no longer work. You can change a lot of obscure parameters in /etc/sshd.config (and maybe /etc/ssh.config as well) or you can sigh and generate new keys using an "acceptable" cipher and distribute the new public key around to every single system that has your old dsa key. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Photo app's -
On 04/13/16 15:57, Samuel Sieb wrote: The iInterface line shows "0" That does not look encouraging ... That's not a good sign. Shotwell must just do PTP on it despite that. Oh well, I guess that's it then. -- . Well I guess I can live with what I know about it then. Thanks much for the help. I did not mean to ignore anyone, but sometimes I get overwhelmed by the details ... Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Photo app's -
On 04/13/2016 12:32 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: lsusb -v -d 04b0:0320 produces the following lines: bInterfaceSubClass 1 Still Image Capture bInterfaceProtocol 1 Picture Transfer Protocol (PIMA 15470) iInterface 0 The iInterface line shows "0" That does not look encouraging ... That's not a good sign. Shotwell must just do PTP on it despite that. Oh well, I guess that's it then. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Chris Murphywrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:19:12 -0600 >> Chris Murphy wrote: >> >>> But that ultimately doesn't fix the problem, I still can't see the >>> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. >> >> Almost certainly depends on the kind of networking the VM >> uses. I always setup all my VMs using a bridge, which makes >> them all look like they are simply other machines all on >> the same subnet. >> >> The default virt-manager networking is to use NAT routing >> and put the VMs inside their own subnet. With that setup, >> you certainly won't see any shares by default from another >> subnet, though you might be able to access them explicitly >> using the IP address or something. > > Brilliant! So this was entirely user error. > > After changing to macvtap+bridge, and setting workgroup back to COLOR > (and rebooting, yeah dig dig), file sharing works! Thwarted. The Windows 10 Media Creation Tool, from Microsoft, does not use an already downloaded ISO. It downloads a new copy, apparently each time you want to create a stick. There are 3rd party USB creation tools but I have no real interesting in effectively testing whether those tools will properly create a USB stick for UEFI computers. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
ssh-agent not working after upgrade to fedora 23
I've googled around for this and found some similar complaints, but none of the solutions mentioned in these threads works for me. So I'm asking here. With F22 on the same machine, my normal routine would be: > ssh-add Enter passphrase for /home/me/.ssh/id_dsa: Identity added: /home/me/.ssh/id_dsa (/home/me/.ssh/id_dsa) > ssh myserver.com But now I get in response: Enter passphrase for /home/me/.ssh/id_dsa: And yet: > ssh-add -L ssh-dss lots of stuff /home/me/.ssh/id_dsa It seems that the agent is not being consulted or something. I've check $SSH_AUTH_SOCK, and it seems to point to something reasonable: > echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK /tmp/ssh-8mkcEDB8W6mO/agent.1158 > ll /tmp/ssh-8mkcEDB8W6mO/agent.1158 srw---. 1 me me 0 Apr 13 15:36 /tmp/ssh-8mkcEDB8W6mO/agent.1158 Any suggestions? Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Tom Horsleywrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:19:12 -0600 > Chris Murphy wrote: > >> But that ultimately doesn't fix the problem, I still can't see the >> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. > > Almost certainly depends on the kind of networking the VM > uses. I always setup all my VMs using a bridge, which makes > them all look like they are simply other machines all on > the same subnet. > > The default virt-manager networking is to use NAT routing > and put the VMs inside their own subnet. With that setup, > you certainly won't see any shares by default from another > subnet, though you might be able to access them explicitly > using the IP address or something. Brilliant! So this was entirely user error. After changing to macvtap+bridge, and setting workgroup back to COLOR (and rebooting, yeah dig dig), file sharing works! -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Woodswrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Chris Murphy > wrote: >> >> I still can't see the >> Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. Should this work? > > > What kind of networking are you using on the VM? If you're using NAT, then > all the connections to the Samba server will appear to come from the same > IP, which may confuse things. If the VM has its own independent IP and MAC virt-manger defaults to NAT. The other option is macvtap, mode options are bridge, VEPA, private, passthrough. I'll try bridge. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Photo app's -
On 04/12/16 01:25, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 04/11/2016 08:43 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: I just installed simple-mtpfs and gat the following: [root@Box10 bobg]# simple-mtpfs -l No raw devices found. [root@Box10 bobg]# simple-mtpfs -l No raw devices found. You said it is a Nikon S3100? I just checked the manual and the camera should support PTP and MTP. Check the output of: lsusb -v -d 04b0:0320 It should have lines with "Picture Transfer Protocol" and "MTP". For example, the following lines are in the info from my phone: bInterfaceSubClass 1 Still Image Capture bInterfaceProtocol 1 Picture Transfer Protocol (PIMA 15470) iInterface 5 MTP Try installing the gvfs-mtp package. It would be easiest to reboot after installing that so the system tasks get started properly. Then try plugging in the camera to the USB port. . I installed that yesterday: [root@Box10 bobg]# dnf install gvfs-mtp Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:01 ago on Wed Apr 13 15:23:42 2016. Package gvfs-mtp-1.26.3-1.fc23.x86_64 is already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! lsusb -v -d 04b0:0320 produces the following lines: bInterfaceSubClass 1 Still Image Capture bInterfaceProtocol 1 Picture Transfer Protocol (PIMA 15470) iInterface 0 The iInterface line shows "0" That does not look encouraging ... Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:19:12 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > But that ultimately doesn't fix the problem, I still can't see the > Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. Almost certainly depends on the kind of networking the VM uses. I always setup all my VMs using a bridge, which makes them all look like they are simply other machines all on the same subnet. The default virt-manager networking is to use NAT routing and put the VMs inside their own subnet. With that setup, you certainly won't see any shares by default from another subnet, though you might be able to access them explicitly using the IP address or something. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Chris Murphywrote: > I still can't see the > Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. Should this work? > What kind of networking are you using on the VM? If you're using NAT, then all the connections to the Samba server will appear to come from the same IP, which may confuse things. If the VM has its own independent IP and MAC addresses, then ignore this. --Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
journalctl/rsyslog pause/delay while logging
Hi, I have a fedora23 mail server that's been working for quite some time. I have rsyslog installed and configured to log mail to /var/log/maillog. It's never had a problem, but for some reason yesterday it started intermittently stop logging for about three minutes, then catch up with the three minutes of missed data before it begins to log normally again. It then appears to log for another few minutes, then repeat this cycle. Looking at the logs with "journalctl -f" shows no such lag with logging, but I can't use journalctl for this project. Any idea what could be causing this? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Windows 10 virt-manager access Samba server
computer1 = Fedora 23 Server, running samba-4.3.6 computer2 =Fedora 23 Workstation, virt-manager VM Windows 10 computer2 happens to be a Mac, and whether Fedora or OS X I can share files just fine from the Samba server. UI wise both Fedora and OS X are about as brain dead simple as it gets, which is what I expect in the modern era. Files > Other Locations > Windows Network > COLOR > F23S Where COLOR is the workgroup set in the samba server's smb.conf and F23S is the hostname. OS X doesn't seem to care about workgroup at all, I never even see the word COLOR when I connect. But in any case both of those OS's work. Windows 10 in a VM, virt-manager running on Fedora 23 Workstation is revisiting misery. It sees only itself in the Explorer under Network. I read elsewhere the workgroups need to match among Windows machines, so I change workgroup from WORKGROUP to COLOR. And f'n wow, really, in 2016 I have to reboot Windows 10 for network changes to take effect? Stunning. So the VM comes up and it still doesn't see the Samba server, and meanwhile Fedora Workstation can't either. Shutdown the VM, Fedora Workstation can see the samba server again. Boot up the VM, now it's gone. So I change the workgroup in Windows 10 to DUNG, and reboot. Fedora Worktstation can now see the Samba server whether the Windows 10 VM is running or not. But that ultimately doesn't fix the problem, I still can't see the Samba server from the Windows 10 VM. Should this work? At this point I'm just curious if it should work and can be made to work. But as a work around I'm already likely to just setup httpd on the server and copy the file over, fully into the VM which is what I was hoping to avoid. But nothing is worth this kind of hassle. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: 389 directory server console and httpd.worker process
With that explanation, if I install console into a server different than the server the directory server instance runs on, while Admin Server (http) is installed on the server the directory server runs on, is it possible? In another words, can console be separate installation into another server so from one console it can control multiple directory server instances? - xinhuan -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Photo app's -
On 04/13/2016 12:09 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 04/13/16 14:56, Samuel Sieb wrote: Did you try those terminal commands I suggested in an earlier email? The results from those would be interesting and useful. -- As I wrote to POC yesterday: "Well, after a lot of googling and trial and error groping around for a command that produces something meaningful [to me] the best I have achieved so far is: [root@Box10 bobg]# gvfs-mount -l Error creating proxy: The connection is closed (g-io-error-quark, 18) It doesn't look like gvfs is the answer either." I just couldn't figure out how to use gvfs, if you can suggest something to try I will do so. I found a few commands but I guess I really didn't know how to apply them. Earlier in this email thread, I wrote this: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BTQGBNTXQHVH3LTC67FI5TGSDX44YVI4/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Photo app's -
On 04/13/16 14:56, Samuel Sieb wrote: Thanks to all for the interesting responses, I always learn something from them ... Did you try those terminal commands I suggested in an earlier email? The results from those would be interesting and useful. -- As I wrote to POC yesterday: "Well, after a lot of googling and trial and error groping around for a command that produces something meaningful [to me] the best I have achieved so far is: [root@Box10 bobg]# gvfs-mount -l Error creating proxy: The connection is closed (g-io-error-quark, 18) It doesn't look like gvfs is the answer either." I just couldn't figure out how to use gvfs, if you can suggest something to try I will do so. I found a few commands but I guess I really didn't know how to apply them. Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Photo app's -
On 04/13/2016 11:50 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: The regular software such as Shotwell works well for getting pictures off the camera and onto the computer and the SD card files can be accessed easily enough with a card reader so I don't think this warrants any more time spent looking for alternatives. Thanks to all for the interesting responses, I always learn something from them ... Did you try those terminal commands I suggested in an earlier email? The results from those would be interesting and useful. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Photo app's -
On 04/12/16 19:11, Jon LaBadie wrote: >You said it is a Nikon S3100? I just checked the manual and the camera >should support PTP and MTP. Check the output of: I too looked at a S3100 manual and found this strange footnote: Notes on Connecting the Camera to a Printer • When Auto is selected for Charge by computer, it may be impossible to print pictures with direct connection of the camera to some printers. If the PictBridge startup screen is not displayed in the monitor after the camera is connected to a printer and turned on, turn the camera off and disconnect the USB cable. Set Charge by computer to Off and reconnect the camera to the printer. Perhaps check if your "Charge by computer" setting is auto and turn to off. jl -- Jon H. LaBadie jo...@jgcomp.com -- . That seemed like it might work, but no, setting "Charge by computer to Off" did not put an icon on the desk top when the device was connected. My daughter, the photographer, didn't believe me, tried with her Mac portable, same result, spent a long time on the phone with Nikon, got only a firmware update said to fix a problem I never had. The regular software such as Shotwell works well for getting pictures off the camera and onto the computer and the SD card files can be accessed easily enough with a card reader so I don't think this warrants any more time spent looking for alternatives. Thanks to all for the interesting responses, I always learn something from them ... Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: 389 directory server console and httpd.worker process
On 04/13/2016 02:11 PM, xinhuan zheng wrote: I want to understand more about 389 directory server. There is a administrative console, 389-console, appearing to be a complete GUI written in Java. There is another process, httpd.worker. When I launch the 389-console, I need to type in (3) information. The administrative cn, bind passwor, and the URL of that httpd.worker is listening on. How does the GUI console interact with the httpd.worker? Who is submitting the requests to the directory server instance? The 389 GUI console or the httpd.worker? Why it needs two separate processes to interact with directory server? Is there a diagram to describe such interaction so I can visualize? There are no diagrams, sorry. Basically you have the java console which is just a client to the DS. Then there is the admin server which is used to perform system tasks, like creating/deleting instances, stopping & starting servers, etc. Once you are authenticated to the console (console -> Admin Server(http) -> Directory Server), then it's the console that issues all the ldap operations to the Directory Server. - xinhuan -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] 389 directory server console and httpd.worker process
I want to understand more about 389 directory server. There is a administrative console, 389-console, appearing to be a complete GUI written in Java. There is another process, httpd.worker. When I launch the 389-console, I need to type in (3) information. The administrative cn, bind passwor, and the URL of that httpd.worker is listening on. How does the GUI console interact with the httpd.worker? Who is submitting the requests to the directory server instance? The 389 GUI console or the httpd.worker? Why it needs two separate processes to interact with directory server? Is there a diagram to describe such interaction so I can visualize? - xinhuan -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf and yum caches
On 04/13/2016 07:40 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: Thank you for all the comments. What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that it's the files in /var/cache/yum/x86_64/22 that are being updated even though I use dnf to do the update. They show the current date of my last update. No, that's expected. The idea is you have lots of stuff in the /var/cache//x86_64/<19|20|21> directories left over from the PREVIOUS versions of the system is what I was trying to infer. A du -hs /var/cache/* would reveal it. My machine at home had tons of stuff from the F18, F19, F20, F21 and F22 incarnations of the system (yes, that poor beast has been upgraded many, MANY times). I'll go ahead and rm -rf the yum and dnf directories and see what happens. That's the quick way to do it. I was trying to emphasize using the tool itself to clean things up, but that's just as effective and probably easier. On 04/12/2016 06:57 PM, stan wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:27:26 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: I reiterate, "dnf clean(whatever)" only cleans the current releasever. If you are on F22, then "dnf clean packages" will only clean up those in the F22 directory tree. The F19, F20 and F21 trees won't be touched unless you specify the "--releasever=" option. You're right. I just assumed they were gone after the upgrade (I don't upgrade using the tool; usually just do a separate fresh install). Bad assumption, it seems. I like the other suggestion, just delete all the /var/cache/dnf and /var/cache/yum directories, and let dnf renew whatever it needs the next time it runs. Make sure the keepcache option is 0, and they will stay clean. No need for the yum directories, and no need for earlier dnf directories. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - If this is the first day of the rest of my life... - -I'm in BIG trouble! - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 23 multiple CPU cooling/temp errors every day
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:55 AM, CS DBAwrote: > > Thanks for the feedback, I've installed thermald, added it to > /etc/rc.d/rc.local and so far have not seen a single cpu temp alert. That package installs a systemd unit. It shouldn't be necessary to add it to rc.local. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 23 multiple CPU cooling/temp errors every day
On 04/13/2016 10:25 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:55 AM, CS DBAwrote: Thanks for the feedback, I've installed thermald, added it to /etc/rc.d/rc.local and so far have not seen a single cpu temp alert. That package installs a systemd unit. It shouldn't be necessary to add it to rc.local. Understood, thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf and yum caches
On 04/13/16 10:42, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 10:12 -0500, g wrote: >> ===> >> i may be in err, but i believe that dnf also uses "/var/cache/yum/*". > > No, it uses /var/cache/dnf. > ===> my bad. i thought i had read in in this list. please excuse. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf and yum caches
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 10:12 -0500, g wrote: > ===> > i may be in err, but i believe that dnf also uses "/var/cache/yum/*". No, it uses /var/cache/dnf. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf and yum caches
On 04/13/16 09:40, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > Thank you for all the comments. > > What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that > it's the files in > > /var/cache/yum/x86_64/22 > ===> i may be in err, but i believe that dnf also uses "/var/cache/yum/*". > that are being updated even though I use dnf to do the update. They show > the current date of my last update. > > I'll go ahead and rm -rf the yum and dnf directories and see what happens. > > Thanks for the help. > > Paolo > ===> while checking paths, have a look under "/var/lib/yum/plugins/local/". -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 23 multiple CPU cooling/temp errors every day
On 04/12/2016 04:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Chris Murphywrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:41 PM, CS DBA wrote: Hi all; Daily I see anywhere from 10 - 50 or more of these alerts via abrt. I'm running Fedora 23 (KDE Spin) fully up to date on a Lenovo X1 carbon 3rd gen. In all the alerts I see that the trip temp was exceeded, and then dropped below the trip temp within 1 second. Below is a sample of the output. Should I be concerned? If not can I disable the popup alert? If so, recommendations? should I consider cleaning & replacing the cpu thermal compound? Thanks in advance The kernel log indicates that hardware errors were detected. System log may have more information. The last 20 mcelog lines of system log are: == Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: Please check your system cooling. Performance will be impacted Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: STATUS 8812080b MCGSTATUS 0 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: MCGCAP 1000c07 APICID 1 SOCKETID 0 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: CPUID Vendor Intel Family 6 Model 61 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: Hardware event. This is not a software error. Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: MCE 0 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: CPU 1 THERMAL EVENT TSC 134e63eb3c2f Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: TIME 1460493199 Tue Apr 12 14:33:19 2016 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: Processor 1 below trip temperature. Throttling disabled Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: STATUS 8813080a MCGSTATUS 0 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: MCGCAP 1000c07 APICID 1 SOCKETID 0 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: CPUID Vendor Intel Family 6 Model 61 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: Hardware event. This is not a software error. Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: MCE 1 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: CPU 0 THERMAL EVENT TSC 134e63eb83f6 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: TIME 1460493199 Tue Apr 12 14:33:19 2016 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: Processor 0 below trip temperature. Throttling disabled Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: STATUS 8813080a MCGSTATUS 0 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: MCGCAP 1000c07 APICID 0 SOCKETID 0 Apr 12 14:33:19 F23-host mcelog: CPUID Vendor Intel Family 6 Model 61 I think any MCE event shoudn't be ignored. There's just no way to know if it's bogus or not. I get these on my machine periodically to no ill effect and there's an upstream kernel bug with no response for years. I thought it should be true that the hardware itself won't allow an overheat, either GPU or CPU, and yet these messages suggest otherwise. What I've been doing is using thermald which you can get from copr. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hadrons123/thermald/ However, what I just realized is that it says that 1.5.3 version build has failed, and yet rpm -q shows 1.5.3 is on my system. And 'thermald --version' also shows it's 1.5.3 and it's running. But it doesn't seem to be working or producing the same messages it used to, where it'd throttle the CPU automatically. Hmmm any wonder why it's seems hotter than usual. Crap! Well it appears to be doing something still, if I relaunch it in debug mode. I guess maybe the new build is just not as verbose as the previous build, by default. What I still don't get is how the copr build state is failed, and yet I have that same build installed. Thanks for the feedback, I've installed thermald, added it to /etc/rc.d/rc.local and so far have not seen a single cpu temp alert. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf and yum caches
Thank you for all the comments. What I find interesting, as I indicated in my original post, is that it's the files in /var/cache/yum/x86_64/22 that are being updated even though I use dnf to do the update. They show the current date of my last update. I'll go ahead and rm -rf the yum and dnf directories and see what happens. Thanks for the help. Paolo On 04/12/2016 06:57 PM, stan wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:27:26 -0700 Rick Stevenswrote: I reiterate, "dnf clean(whatever)" only cleans the current releasever. If you are on F22, then "dnf clean packages" will only clean up those in the F22 directory tree. The F19, F20 and F21 trees won't be touched unless you specify the "--releasever=" option. You're right. I just assumed they were gone after the upgrade (I don't upgrade using the tool; usually just do a separate fresh install). Bad assumption, it seems. I like the other suggestion, just delete all the /var/cache/dnf and /var/cache/yum directories, and let dnf renew whatever it needs the next time it runs. Make sure the keepcache option is 0, and they will stay clean. No need for the yum directories, and no need for earlier dnf directories. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RE: How to install gnome-shell-extension-taskbar?
Hi Jon > It seems to have changed name to "Gnome Theme Tweak". I installed it and > now I have "Gnome Shell Integration" plugin installed. I did have to activate > it > to get it working, but didn't need restart Firefox. I installed "Gnome Theme Tweak" and was then able to install the Taskbar extension. Thanks very much for your help. Best regards David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to install gnome-shell-extension-taskbar?
Den 2016-04-13 kl. 11:36, skrev David Aldrich: > Hi > >> OK, need to install the plugin "Gnome Shell Integration" in your browser. I >> am >> using Firefox but there should be plugin for Chrome also. >> Yes, I checked that the plugin exist so install it and you should be able to >> install >> "Gnome Shell Integration". > > I'm sorry, but I am still struggling with this. I have installed the plugin > "Gnome Shell Integration" in Firefox. But when I browse to: > > https://extensions.gnome.org/ > > (in Firefox) I then see: > > "We cannot detect a running copy of GNOME on this system, so some parts of > the interface may be disabled. See our troubleshooting entry for more > information." > > The troubleshooting info suggests checking the network proxy configuration > and that unzip is installed. I've checked both of these are ok. Any more > suggestions please? > > David Just not sure if this is relevant. Two questions: 1. Did you restart Firefox after you installed "Gnome Shell Integration" plugin? 2. Did you activate the plugin? I started one of my VM Fedora 22 on my server and did some test to see if I get same problem as you. I started Gnome-Tweak-tool and clicked on the link fore more extensions and got same problem as you "We cannot detect a running copy of GNOME on this system... ". When I looked at what plugin was there and "Gnome Shell Integration" plugin was missing so I search for that Firefox plugin. It seems to have changed name to "Gnome Theme Tweak". I installed it and now I have "Gnome Shell Integration" plugin installed. I did have to activate it to get it working, but didn't need restart Firefox. The Firefox was version 45. -- Regards Jon Ingason -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RE: How to install gnome-shell-extension-taskbar?
Hi > OK, need to install the plugin "Gnome Shell Integration" in your browser. I am > using Firefox but there should be plugin for Chrome also. > Yes, I checked that the plugin exist so install it and you should be able to > install > "Gnome Shell Integration". I'm sorry, but I am still struggling with this. I have installed the plugin "Gnome Shell Integration" in Firefox. But when I browse to: https://extensions.gnome.org/ (in Firefox) I then see: "We cannot detect a running copy of GNOME on this system, so some parts of the interface may be disabled. See our troubleshooting entry for more information." The troubleshooting info suggests checking the network proxy configuration and that unzip is installed. I've checked both of these are ok. Any more suggestions please? David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org