RE: RE: 2 different scores?
Thanks to everyone for their help... Charles pointed me in the right direction, I had 2 copies of spamassassin. But just removing one didn't do the trick. Recompiled from source after that, and I think it's good to go. So far spam has been scored above 5, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed. Evan
RE: RE: 2 different scores?
Evan Platt wrote: At 12:58 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote: Network tests are definitely missing. There are two ways to turn off network tests. The first is with the '-L' option to spamd. The second is with config options in local.cf. Using the config options should affect both spamd and spamassassin, so based on the behavior, I would say that it looks like you still have the '-L' option on spamd. Or else they are reading their configuration from different directories. My local.cf is pretty basic. Nothing in there about network tests or disabling them. One thing you can do is to add the '-D' option to spamd. This will cause it to log lots of debugging stuff that may help you figure out why it is not running network tests. This will be written to syslog by default. This will log LOTS of stuff, so you may want to turn it on, let one or two messages come through, and then turn it off again. You can then read through the debug info and look for problems. If you can't see anything wrong, post it here and see if we can. http://www.espphotography.com/debug.txt From my untrained eye, it looks like one message did get the tests, one didn't? It looks to me like both messages ran the tests. [1041] dbg: uridnsbl: done waiting for URIDNSBL lookups to complete [1041] dbg: uridnsbl: aborting remaining lookups There seems to be a timeout issue. Is there something that might be blocking your DNS lookups? Also... [1041] dbg: spf: cannot load or create Mail::SPF::Query module This indicates that SPF checking is enabled, but you have not installed the Perl module for it. You need to install Mail::SPF::Query in order to take advantage of SPF. [1041] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is not available: no pyzor executable found Pyzor is enabled, but it is not installed. If you want to use it, you will need to download and install the pyzor program. -- Bowie
RE: 2 different scores?
Evan Platt wrote: At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote: :0fw: spamassassin.lock |spamd -L -c -s 512000 This should be: spamc -c -s 512000 Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the mail isn't marked up at all. My cron entry upon bootup is: /opt/local/bin/spamd -L Get rid of the '-L'. That went from bad to worse... It looked for a while like all messages were being scored as 0, but it actually is basically blackholing messages. I'd ses entries in my mail log, but no mail in my inbox: removed log info Then took out :0fw: spamassassin.lock |spamc -c -s 512000 From my procmail, and it's fine - well obviously no spamassassin scores. I'm at my wits end, and the fact that I'm sick isn't helping much either. :( I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do |program, what is the expected output of the command? If it expects to get the filtered email back from the program, you will need to leave off the '-c' like this: |spamc -s 512000 -- Bowie Bailey
Re: RE: 2 different scores?
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: 2 different scores? Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:13:11 -0400 I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do |program, what is the expected output of the command? If it expects to get the filtered email back from the program, you will need to leave off the '-c' like this: |spamc -s 512000 -- Bowie Bailey Ok, here's where I'm at now, and things are working, but back at square one, near as I can tell, no network tests are being performed. (Well, a message that scores a 1.x gets scored quite a bit higher when run through spamassassin). So here's what I think is happening based on what help I've gotten here.. I know this isn't quite a SA issue, but I hope with the experts here, someone can point me in the right direction. I know enough of SA and linux to be dangerous. This is running on a OS/X 10.4 mac box. So spamd is called from a cron entry upon system boot: /opt/local/bin/spamd . :0fw: spamassassin.lock | spamc is my procmail entry. So here's where my lack of how SA works comes into play: Is the procmail entry basically calling spamc from 'memory' (ie from the spamd process), or is it calling the executable program? My guess is I have more than one spamc / spamd / spamassassin, so when I run spamassassin from the command line, that's running the network tests, but spamc from procmail is calling a different spamc. Can I somehow run spamc or spamd from the command line as I do spamassassin, ie spamassassin inputfile outputfile to find out which spamc to call in procmail, and can I in fact specify a spamc, ie /path/to/spamc ? Am I on the right track? Thanks. Evan
RE: RE: 2 different scores?
Evan Platt wrote: From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do |program, what is the expected output of the command? If it expects to get the filtered email back from the program, you will need to leave off the '-c' like this: |spamc -s 512000 Ok, here's where I'm at now, and things are working, but back at square one, near as I can tell, no network tests are being performed. (Well, a message that scores a 1.x gets scored quite a bit higher when run through spamassassin). So here's what I think is happening based on what help I've gotten here.. I know this isn't quite a SA issue, but I hope with the experts here, someone can point me in the right direction. I know enough of SA and linux to be dangerous. This is running on a OS/X 10.4 mac box. So spamd is called from a cron entry upon system boot: /opt/local/bin/spamd . :0fw: spamassassin.lock | spamc is my procmail entry. So here's where my lack of how SA works comes into play: Is the procmail entry basically calling spamc from 'memory' (ie from the spamd process), or is it calling the executable program? spamc is a small executable that hands off the message to spamd for processing. My guess is I have more than one spamc / spamd / spamassassin, so when I run spamassassin from the command line, that's running the network tests, but spamc from procmail is calling a different spamc. Can I somehow run spamc or spamd from the command line as I do spamassassin, ie spamassassin inputfile outputfile to find out which spamc to call in procmail, and can I in fact specify a spamc, ie /path/to/spamc ? You can run it from the command line the same way you do with spamassassin. spamc inputfile outputfile You also might want to check the process that is running to see exactly what settings it is using. ps -ef | grep spamd -- Bowie
RE: RE: 2 different scores?
At 11:30 AM 10/9/2006, you wrote: spamc is a small executable that hands off the message to spamd for processing. Ahh ok. You can run it from the command line the same way you do with spamassassin. spamc inputfile outputfile You also might want to check the process that is running to see exactly what settings it is using. ps -ef | grep spamd For macs, the -ef doesn't work. ps aux is I believe the equivilant: root57 0.0 2.743692 14196 ?? Ss 10:35AM 0:06.62 /opt/local/bin/perl -T -w /opt/local/bin/spamd root 290 0.0 3.544548 18376 ?? S10:36AM 0:19.29 spamd child root 291 0.0 3.043308 15772 ?? S10:36AM 0:00.85 spamd child root 675 0.0 0.0 8780 8 p0 R+ 11:53AM 0:00.00 grep spamd Ok, it appears spamc definitely isn't using network tests. Just ran a message through spamc and spamassassin: spamc: X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,INFO_TLD, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=3.1.6 spamassasin: X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=13.3 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,INFO_TLD,UPPERCASE_25_50,URIBL_AB_SURBL, URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.1.6 I called both spamc and spamassassin with the full path. Evan
RE: RE: 2 different scores?
Evan Platt wrote: At 11:30 AM 10/9/2006, you wrote: spamc is a small executable that hands off the message to spamd for processing. Ahh ok. You can run it from the command line the same way you do with spamassassin. spamc inputfile outputfile You also might want to check the process that is running to see exactly what settings it is using. ps -ef | grep spamd For macs, the -ef doesn't work. ps aux is I believe the equivilant: root57 0.0 2.743692 14196 ?? Ss 10:35AM 0:06.62 /opt/local/bin/perl -T -w /opt/local/bin/spamd That is the process you want, but I don't see any options shown. I'm not sure if it is just not showing them or if you are not using any options. My output from 'ps -ef' looks like this: root 2905 1 0 Oct04 ?00:00:28 /usr/bin/spamd -d -m 4 --max-conn-per-child=50 -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid -u mailuser -x --virtual-config-dir=/home/mailuser/%d/%l/spamassassin Ok, it appears spamc definitely isn't using network tests. Just ran a message through spamc and spamassassin: spamc: X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,INFO_TLD, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=3.1.6 spamassasin: X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=13.3 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,INFO_TLD,UPPERCASE_25_50,URIBL_AB_SURBL, URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.1.6 I called both spamc and spamassassin with the full path. Network tests are definitely missing. There are two ways to turn off network tests. The first is with the '-L' option to spamd. The second is with config options in local.cf. Using the config options should affect both spamd and spamassassin, so based on the behavior, I would say that it looks like you still have the '-L' option on spamd. Or else they are reading their configuration from different directories. One thing you can do is to add the '-D' option to spamd. This will cause it to log lots of debugging stuff that may help you figure out why it is not running network tests. This will be written to syslog by default. This will log LOTS of stuff, so you may want to turn it on, let one or two messages come through, and then turn it off again. You can then read through the debug info and look for problems. If you can't see anything wrong, post it here and see if we can. -- Bowie
RE: RE: 2 different scores?
At 12:58 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote: Network tests are definitely missing. There are two ways to turn off network tests. The first is with the '-L' option to spamd. The second is with config options in local.cf. Using the config options should affect both spamd and spamassassin, so based on the behavior, I would say that it looks like you still have the '-L' option on spamd. Or else they are reading their configuration from different directories. My local.cf is pretty basic. Nothing in there about network tests or disabling them. One thing you can do is to add the '-D' option to spamd. This will cause it to log lots of debugging stuff that may help you figure out why it is not running network tests. This will be written to syslog by default. This will log LOTS of stuff, so you may want to turn it on, let one or two messages come through, and then turn it off again. You can then read through the debug info and look for problems. If you can't see anything wrong, post it here and see if we can. http://www.espphotography.com/debug.txt From my untrained eye, it looks like one message did get the tests, one didn't? Evan
Re: 2 different scores?
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evan Platt wrote:
At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote:
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
|spamd -L -c -s 512000
This should be:
spamc -c -s 512000
Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the
mail isn't marked up at all.
My cron entry upon bootup is:
/opt/local/bin/spamd -L
What the censored are you running spamd from cron for? It is
usually started from your init sequence and runs as a daemon.
spamd -d -c -m3 -Hi --max-conn-per-child=15 is the usual sort
of incantation to start it off. Then it stays running forever.
Without the -d option it does not daemonize.
Get rid of the '-L'.
That went from bad to worse... It looked for a while like all
messages were being scored as 0, but it actually is basically
blackholing messages. I'd ses entries in my mail log, but no mail in
my inbox:
removed log info
Then took out
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
|spamc -c -s 512000
From my procmail, and it's fine - well obviously no spamassassin
scores.
OF COURSE NOT - you probably do not have spamd running at that time.
Or if it is it's not listening for you.
I'm at my wits end, and the fact that I'm sick isn't helping much
either. :(
I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do |program,
what is the expected output of the command? If it expects to get the
filtered email back from the program, you will need to leave off the
'-c' like this:
|spamc -s 512000
He might try | /usr/bin/spamc -s 512000.
I use this:
:0 fw: spamassassin.lock
* 50
* !^List-Id: .*(spamassassin\.apache.\org)
| /usr/bin/spamc -t 150 -u jdow
{^_^}
Re: 2 different scores?
At 04:07 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote: What the censored are you running spamd from cron for? It is usually started from your init sequence and runs as a daemon. I changed that earlier. My mac seems to be ignoring the /Library/StartupItems. spamd -d -c -m3 -Hi --max-conn-per-child=15 is the usual sort of incantation to start it off. Then it stays running forever. Without the -d option it does not daemonize. I'm now starting it with -d -x OF COURSE NOT - you probably do not have spamd running at that time. Or if it is it's not listening for you. It's being run as root. He might try | /usr/bin/spamc -s 512000. I use this: :0 fw: spamassassin.lock * 50 * !^List-Id: .*(spamassassin\.apache.\org) | /usr/bin/spamc -t 150 -u jdow I changed it back to /usr/bin/spamc -s 512000, we'll see what that does.
Re: 2 different scores?
From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:07 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
What the censored are you running spamd from cron for? It is
usually started from your init sequence and runs as a daemon.
I changed that earlier. My mac seems to be ignoring the /Library/StartupItems.
spamd -d -c -m3 -Hi --max-conn-per-child=15 is the usual sort
of incantation to start it off. Then it stays running forever.
Without the -d option it does not daemonize.
I'm now starting it with -d -x
I presume you are no longer running it out of cron. That will run
multiple copies which might muddy the water, or at least cause
interesting error messages. It might be that you need to call it
with /usr/bin/spamd -d -x
OF COURSE NOT - you probably do not have spamd running at that time.
Or if it is it's not listening for you.
It's being run as root.
He might try | /usr/bin/spamc -s 512000.
I use this:
:0 fw: spamassassin.lock
* 50
* !^List-Id: .*(spamassassin\.apache.\org)
| /usr/bin/spamc -t 150 -u jdow
I changed it back to /usr/bin/spamc -s 512000, we'll see what that does.
Make sure spamd (and some children not multiple copies of spamd) is
showing in your list of running processes. You might kill the parent
processes until no spamd's are running. Then start exactly one spamd.
It will spawn children. The children are what spamc contacts. Make
sure there is no firewall rule that prevents spamc communicating
with spamd.
Make sure ONLY procmail is calling spamassassin and that this is done
exactly once.
You can test with a single test email message from your inbox. Copy it
to a file, headers and all. Then use spamc testfile | less to see
what happens. Given the way you are running it you may need to run
spamc as the user that procmail uses at the time it runs spamc.
{^_^}
Re: 2 different scores?
Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: result: . 0 - BLANK_LINES_80_90,SUBJECT_NOVOWEL Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[70]: prefork: child states: II\n Those log lines bother me a bit. The first indicates that you are scanning pretty much a blank message. I don't know if that was a test mail, a spam, or something is rather wrong. But it seems like an unusual set of rules to hit and an unusual score. The second line indicates that there are two children in mode I. I don't recall for sure what I means. If it is Idle, than this is probably ok. BTW, you also have a lock set up in procmail to only run one mail at once. Since you have at least two spamd children to process the mail at once, there is no real need to limit the processing to single-threading unless you are just plain out of memory. That should speed things up some. Are you saying this setup is failing to deliver mail? It looks to me (as best I can read the log, which isn't well) as though it should have delivered the message with a score of zero. Loren - Original Message - From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 10:22 PM Subject: RE: 2 different scores? At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote: 0fw: spamassassin.lock spamd -L -c -s 512000 This should be: spamc -c -s 512000 Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the mail isn't marked up at all. My cron entry upon bootup is: /opt/local/bin/spamd -L Get rid of the '-L'. That went from bad to worse... It looked for a while like all messages were being scored as 0, but it actually is basically blackholing messages. I'd ses entries in my mail log, but no mail in my inbox: Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/smtpd[292]: connect from web53414.mail.yahoo.com[206.190.39.74] Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/smtpd[292]: C11838F80AC: client=web53414.mail.yahoo.com[206.190.39.74] Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/cleanup[293]: C11838F80AC: message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/qmgr[96]: C11838F80AC: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1079, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 49157\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: setuid to nobody succeeded\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: checking message [EMAIL PROTECTED] for nobody:-2\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com postfix/smtpd[292]: disconnect from web53414.mail.yahoo.com[206.190.39.74] Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com postfix/local[294]: C11838F80AC: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], orig_to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=local, delay=1, status=sent (delivered to command: IFS=' ' exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #eplatt) Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com postfix/qmgr[96]: C11838F80AC: removed Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: clean message (0.2/5.0) for nobody:-2 in 0.2 seconds, 1227 bytes.\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: result: . 0 - BLANK_LINES_80_90,SUBJECT_NOVOWEL scantime=0.2,size=1227,user=nobody,uid=-2,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=49157,mid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],autolearn=no\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[70]: prefork: child states: II\n ^[[BOct 6 22:16:16 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[301]: pop3 service init from 192.168.1.2 Oct 6 22:16:16 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[301]: Login user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0/0 Oct 6 22:16:16 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[301]: Logout user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0 ndele=0 Oct 6 22:16:36 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[303]: pop3 service init from 192.168.1.2 Oct 6 22:16:36 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[303]: Login user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0/0 Oct 6 22:16:36 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[303]: Logout user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0 ndele=0 Then took out :0fw: spamassassin.lock | spamc -c -s 512000 From my procmail, and it's fine - well obviously no spamassassin scores. I'm at my wits end, and the fact that I'm sick isn't helping much either. :(
Re: 2 different scores?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_HOME_NL,INFO_TLD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.2 required=5.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_HOME_NL, INFO_TLD,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL autolearn=spam version=3.1.6 Any hints of what to look for as to why mail being received isn't The first case obviously isn't using network tests. -L on spamd startup? Permissions problem? Different usercode than what you ran the test under? Different home directory? I'd make a guess at the -L parameter as a first shot. Loren
Re: 2 different scores?
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: 2 different scores? Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 01:11:50 -0700 The first case obviously isn't using network tests. -L on spamd startup? Permissions problem? Different usercode than what you ran the test under? Different home directory? I'd make a guess at the -L parameter as a first shot. Unless I'm misunderstanding.. I changed my procmailrc to; :0fw: spamassassin.lock | spamd -L -c -s 512000 Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the mail isn't marked up at all. My cron entry upon bootup is: /opt/local/bin/spamd -L run as root. Any more help appreciated.. Thanks. Evan
RE: 2 different scores?
From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... I changed my procmailrc to; :0fw: spamassassin.lock | spamd -L -c -s 512000 Shouldn't that be spamc?
RE: 2 different scores?
Evan Platt wrote: From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] The first case obviously isn't using network tests. -L on spamd startup? Permissions problem? Different usercode than what you ran the test under? Different home directory? I'd make a guess at the -L parameter as a first shot. Unless I'm misunderstanding.. I changed my procmailrc to; 0fw: spamassassin.lock spamd -L -c -s 512000 This should be: spamc -c -s 512000 Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the mail isn't marked up at all. My cron entry upon bootup is: /opt/local/bin/spamd -L Get rid of the '-L'. -- Bowie
RE: 2 different scores?
At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote: 0fw: spamassassin.lock spamd -L -c -s 512000 This should be: spamc -c -s 512000 Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the mail isn't marked up at all. My cron entry upon bootup is: /opt/local/bin/spamd -L Get rid of the '-L'. That went from bad to worse... It looked for a while like all messages were being scored as 0, but it actually is basically blackholing messages. I'd ses entries in my mail log, but no mail in my inbox: Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/smtpd[292]: connect from web53414.mail.yahoo.com[206.190.39.74] Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/smtpd[292]: C11838F80AC: client=web53414.mail.yahoo.com[206.190.39.74] Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/cleanup[293]: C11838F80AC: message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 6 22:15:37 www-espphotography-com postfix/qmgr[96]: C11838F80AC: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1079, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 49157\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: setuid to nobody succeeded\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: checking message [EMAIL PROTECTED] for nobody:-2\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com postfix/smtpd[292]: disconnect from web53414.mail.yahoo.com[206.190.39.74] Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com postfix/local[294]: C11838F80AC: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], orig_to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=local, delay=1, status=sent (delivered to command: IFS=' ' exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #eplatt) Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com postfix/qmgr[96]: C11838F80AC: removed Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: clean message (0.2/5.0) for nobody:-2 in 0.2 seconds, 1227 bytes.\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: result: . 0 - BLANK_LINES_80_90,SUBJECT_NOVOWEL scantime=0.2,size=1227,user=nobody,uid=-2,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=49157,mid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],autolearn=no\n Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[70]: prefork: child states: II\n ^[[BOct 6 22:16:16 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[301]: pop3 service init from 192.168.1.2 Oct 6 22:16:16 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[301]: Login user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0/0 Oct 6 22:16:16 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[301]: Logout user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0 ndele=0 Oct 6 22:16:36 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[303]: pop3 service init from 192.168.1.2 Oct 6 22:16:36 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[303]: Login user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0/0 Oct 6 22:16:36 www-espphotography-com ipop3d[303]: Logout user=eplatt host=[192.168.1.2] nmsgs=0 ndele=0 Then took out :0fw: spamassassin.lock | spamc -c -s 512000 From my procmail, and it's fine - well obviously no spamassassin scores. I'm at my wits end, and the fact that I'm sick isn't helping much either. :(
