Re: [ANN] Polish blog about Tapestry 5
Don't worry to much about exception page, it's important for me that it gives me information, I don't need to like colors ;) Besides while translating, I guess that most of context data may be lost. My blog posts won't be 100% serious, it's just not my style. I'm big fan of T5, else I wouldn't follow it for over 2 yrs or something like that ;) @Adam: I don't believe as it is needed. It would also require a lot of work. Also maintaining page later on would be pain. I prefer to cover same topics on my blog as a reference with other examples (guess game is probably not the best example of that ;) Sorry for just copying it, but I had no better idea to show simple mechanism Regards Michal -- View this message in context: http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/ANN-Polish-blog-about-Tapestry-5-tp5768229p5769634.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
[ANN] Polish blog about Tapestry 5
Hi all, I started writing blog about tapestry some time ago. Today I announced that in public. Till I'll get comfortable with writing on regular basis I'm planning to stick to my mothers tongue and that is polish. Later on I plan to do couple screen casts in English, maybe switch language totally on all posts. I hope to convince some people to tapestry camp. Currently i'm writing step by step tutorial. If any one is interested please request translation in comments or use google translate ;) Please cross your fingers for success and enough of my self motivation to keep on writing new stuff :) Hope that this blog will be another reference for tapestry freshers. oh, and address :P http://mgruca.wordpress.com Regards Michał Gruca -- View this message in context: http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/ANN-Polish-blog-about-Tapestry-5-tp5768229p5768229.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [ANN] Polish blog about Tapestry 5
It's always great to see more blogs on Tapestry even if the machine translations are a challenge. Also, I'm sorry the colors of the exception report page make your eyes hurt. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Michal Gruca michalgr...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I started writing blog about tapestry some time ago. Today I announced that in public. Till I'll get comfortable with writing on regular basis I'm planning to stick to my mothers tongue and that is polish. Later on I plan to do couple screen casts in English, maybe switch language totally on all posts. I hope to convince some people to tapestry camp. Currently i'm writing step by step tutorial. If any one is interested please request translation in comments or use google translate ;) Please cross your fingers for success and enough of my self motivation to keep on writing new stuff :) Hope that this blog will be another reference for tapestry freshers. oh, and address :P http://mgruca.wordpress.com Regards Michał Gruca -- View this message in context: http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/ANN-Polish-blog-about-Tapestry-5-tp5768229p5768229.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com
Re: [ANN] Polish blog about Tapestry 5
Very very nice ! I am also Polish, and reading your blog seems natural and enjoyable. Some stuff obviously covered on the Tapestry site, with Howard's tutorial, etc.. This brings a thought. Possible translations for tapestry.apache.org ? I could help with Polish :) Adam On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote: It's always great to see more blogs on Tapestry even if the machine translations are a challenge. Also, I'm sorry the colors of the exception report page make your eyes hurt. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Michal Gruca michalgr...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I started writing blog about tapestry some time ago. Today I announced that in public. Till I'll get comfortable with writing on regular basis I'm planning to stick to my mothers tongue and that is polish. Later on I plan to do couple screen casts in English, maybe switch language totally on all posts. I hope to convince some people to tapestry camp. Currently i'm writing step by step tutorial. If any one is interested please request translation in comments or use google translate ;) Please cross your fingers for success and enough of my self motivation to keep on writing new stuff :) Hope that this blog will be another reference for tapestry freshers. oh, and address :P http://mgruca.wordpress.com Regards Michał Gruca -- View this message in context: http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/ANN-Polish-blog-about-Tapestry-5-tp5768229p5768229.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
Well, it took me longer than I wanted, but the patch has been applied.
Thanks again.
--
Kevin
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Kevin Menard nirvd...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for opening TAP5-913, Dmitry. I'll try to apply this tonight.
Unfortunately the test system for Tapestry doesn't work for Snow
Leopard, so I have to run in a VM to verify everything is passing.
--
Kevin
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made a Pull request on github with fixes for java.lang.VerifyError.
Here's the commit details:
http://github.com/dmitrygusev/tapestry5/commit/35197745d13ffed1fb89d730dbc85f750bf50bb0
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:14, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
A follow up question to the committers on this : Is Jun's approach below
something acceptable to do in the meantime ? I was trying to deploy a test
5.1 app to GAE and I ran into the same issue. As he indicated these methods
had emtpy try-catch blocks, removing which is supposed to resolve the
issue.
THe part that worries me are the magical $ANTLR comments that I think can
somehow be used by ANTLR. Any tips ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Dmitry Gusev
AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
Thanks for opening TAP5-913, Dmitry. I'll try to apply this tonight.
Unfortunately the test system for Tapestry doesn't work for Snow
Leopard, so I have to run in a VM to verify everything is passing.
--
Kevin
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made a Pull request on github with fixes for java.lang.VerifyError.
Here's the commit details:
http://github.com/dmitrygusev/tapestry5/commit/35197745d13ffed1fb89d730dbc85f750bf50bb0
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:14, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
A follow up question to the committers on this : Is Jun's approach below
something acceptable to do in the meantime ? I was trying to deploy a test
5.1 app to GAE and I ran into the same issue. As he indicated these methods
had emtpy try-catch blocks, removing which is supposed to resolve the
issue.
THe part that worries me are the magical $ANTLR comments that I think can
somehow be used by ANTLR. Any tips ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Dmitry Gusev
AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
I've made a Pull request on github with fixes for java.lang.VerifyError.
Here's the commit details:
http://github.com/dmitrygusev/tapestry5/commit/35197745d13ffed1fb89d730dbc85f750bf50bb0
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:14, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
A follow up question to the committers on this : Is Jun's approach below
something acceptable to do in the meantime ? I was trying to deploy a test
5.1 app to GAE and I ran into the same issue. As he indicated these methods
had emtpy try-catch blocks, removing which is supposed to resolve the
issue.
THe part that worries me are the magical $ANTLR comments that I think can
somehow be used by ANTLR. Any tips ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Dmitry Gusev
AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
nice job
2009/10/28 Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
I've made a Pull request on github with fixes for java.lang.VerifyError.
Here's the commit details:
http://github.com/dmitrygusev/tapestry5/commit/35197745d13ffed1fb89d730dbc85f750bf50bb0
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:14, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
A follow up question to the committers on this : Is Jun's approach below
something acceptable to do in the meantime ? I was trying to deploy a
test
5.1 app to GAE and I ran into the same issue. As he indicated these
methods
had emtpy try-catch blocks, removing which is supposed to resolve the
issue.
THe part that worries me are the magical $ANTLR comments that I think can
somehow be used by ANTLR. Any tips ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But
when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add
javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both
the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Dmitry Gusev
AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
A follow up question to the committers on this : Is Jun's approach below
something acceptable to do in the meantime ? I was trying to deploy a test
5.1 app to GAE and I ran into the same issue. As he indicated these methods
had emtpy try-catch blocks, removing which is supposed to resolve the issue.
THe part that worries me are the magical $ANTLR comments that I think can
somehow be used by ANTLR. Any tips ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink ,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
Robert Zeigler wrote: There's an open issue for this (TAP5-713) and Christian Köberl has a working patch that seems to be about 98% there... By the way: I have put my code in a Github project: http://wiki.github.com/derkoe/tapestry-sax-parser You can use this to have Tapestry running without Stax. Cheers, Chris -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Good-news-about-Tapestry-5-in-Google-App-Engine-tp3576791p3596728.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
There's an open issue for this (TAP5-713) and Christian Köberl has a
working patch that seems to be about 98% there... two tests still fail
on the command line, although they don't fail when run separately in
eclipse. I may have some time to look over the patch (and the
corresponding tests) this week.
Robert
On Sep 4, 2009, at 9/45:04 PM , Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
No promises, but I'd think 5.2 is quite reasonable. I'd love to
straighten
this out and reduce the external dependencies that Tapestry brings in.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Howard,
thanks for the quick response. Do you think that these changes
would be
coming into the next point release (e.g. 5.2) or are they more
likely to
happen further out in the future ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
wrote:
My intention is to remove the dependencies on javax.stream and
revert to
a
SAX parser. For reasonably sized documents such as Tapestry
templates,
there's no reason not to use SAX to read the whole document into a
stream
of
tokens similar to what STAX gives you. Fortunately, the tests in
this
area
are really good!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com
wrote:
A quick question for the commiters : I do recall seeing some
messages
about
an option to remove woodstox and using plain java.xml.stream
APIs. Is
there
a plan to integrate any of these changes into the standard build or
would
they remain an external module (if that's even needed w/ the GAE
issue
resolved) ? Along the same lines, woudl Jun's changes be
considered for
integration into the codebase ?
In summary, I'd be curious to know if incorporating changes to
support
T5
running seamlessly on GAE is in the plan, and if yes, if there is
any
idea
when they might be released (e.g. maybe 5.2 ) ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK.
But
when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/
t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer,
method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org
.apache
.tapestry5
.internal
.services
.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org
.apache
.tapestry5
.internal
.services
.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org
.apache
.tapestry5
.internal
.services
.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:
1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add
javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use
both
the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE
now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact
me to
learn
how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me
to learn
how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
deploy 5.1 application. http://ganshane.appspot.com
2009/9/5 Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
No promises, but I'd think 5.2 is quite reasonable. I'd love to straighten
this out and reduce the external dependencies that Tapestry brings in.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
Howard,
thanks for the quick response. Do you think that these changes would be
coming into the next point release (e.g. 5.2) or are they more likely to
happen further out in the future ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
wrote:
My intention is to remove the dependencies on javax.stream and revert
to
a
SAX parser. For reasonably sized documents such as Tapestry templates,
there's no reason not to use SAX to read the whole document into a
stream
of
tokens similar to what STAX gives you. Fortunately, the tests in this
area
are really good!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com
wrote:
A quick question for the commiters : I do recall seeing some messages
about
an option to remove woodstox and using plain java.xml.stream APIs.
Is
there
a plan to integrate any of these changes into the standard build or
would
they remain an external module (if that's even needed w/ the GAE
issue
resolved) ? Along the same lines, woudl Jun's changes be considered
for
integration into the codebase ?
In summary, I'd be curious to know if incorporating changes to
support
T5
running seamlessly on GAE is in the plan, and if yes, if there is any
idea
when they might be released (e.g. maybe 5.2 ) ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK.
But
when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about
about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer,
method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add
javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use
both
the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE
now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training,
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink ,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method: mRANGEOP
signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
A quick question for the commiters : I do recall seeing some messages about
an option to remove woodstox and using plain java.xml.stream APIs. Is there
a plan to integrate any of these changes into the standard build or would
they remain an external module (if that's even needed w/ the GAE issue
resolved) ? Along the same lines, woudl Jun's changes be considered for
integration into the codebase ?
In summary, I'd be curious to know if incorporating changes to support T5
running seamlessly on GAE is in the plan, and if yes, if there is any idea
when they might be released (e.g. maybe 5.2 ) ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink ,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
My intention is to remove the dependencies on javax.stream and revert to a
SAX parser. For reasonably sized documents such as Tapestry templates,
there's no reason not to use SAX to read the whole document into a stream of
tokens similar to what STAX gives you. Fortunately, the tests in this area
are really good!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick question for the commiters : I do recall seeing some messages about
an option to remove woodstox and using plain java.xml.stream APIs. Is
there
a plan to integrate any of these changes into the standard build or would
they remain an external module (if that's even needed w/ the GAE issue
resolved) ? Along the same lines, woudl Jun's changes be considered for
integration into the codebase ?
In summary, I'd be curious to know if incorporating changes to support T5
running seamlessly on GAE is in the plan, and if yes, if there is any idea
when they might be released (e.g. maybe 5.2 ) ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn
how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
Howard,
thanks for the quick response. Do you think that these changes would be
coming into the next point release (e.g. 5.2) or are they more likely to
happen further out in the future ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
My intention is to remove the dependencies on javax.stream and revert to a
SAX parser. For reasonably sized documents such as Tapestry templates,
there's no reason not to use SAX to read the whole document into a stream
of
tokens similar to what STAX gives you. Fortunately, the tests in this area
are really good!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick question for the commiters : I do recall seeing some messages
about
an option to remove woodstox and using plain java.xml.stream APIs. Is
there
a plan to integrate any of these changes into the standard build or would
they remain an external module (if that's even needed w/ the GAE issue
resolved) ? Along the same lines, woudl Jun's changes be considered for
integration into the codebase ?
In summary, I'd be curious to know if incorporating changes to support T5
running seamlessly on GAE is in the plan, and if yes, if there is any
idea
when they might be released (e.g. maybe 5.2 ) ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But
when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add
javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both
the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn
how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
No promises, but I'd think 5.2 is quite reasonable. I'd love to straighten
this out and reduce the external dependencies that Tapestry brings in.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com wrote:
Howard,
thanks for the quick response. Do you think that these changes would be
coming into the next point release (e.g. 5.2) or are they more likely to
happen further out in the future ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
wrote:
My intention is to remove the dependencies on javax.stream and revert to
a
SAX parser. For reasonably sized documents such as Tapestry templates,
there's no reason not to use SAX to read the whole document into a stream
of
tokens similar to what STAX gives you. Fortunately, the tests in this
area
are really good!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Alex Kotchnev akoch...@gmail.com
wrote:
A quick question for the commiters : I do recall seeing some messages
about
an option to remove woodstox and using plain java.xml.stream APIs. Is
there
a plan to integrate any of these changes into the standard build or
would
they remain an external module (if that's even needed w/ the GAE issue
resolved) ? Along the same lines, woudl Jun's changes be considered for
integration into the codebase ?
In summary, I'd be curious to know if incorporating changes to support
T5
running seamlessly on GAE is in the plan, and if yes, if there is any
idea
when they might be released (e.g. maybe 5.2 ) ?
Cheers,
Alex K
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in
PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr.
// $ANTLR start INTEGER
public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end INTEGER
// $ANTLR start DEREF
public final void mDEREF() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end DEREF
// $ANTLR start RANGEOP
public final void mRANGEOP() throws RecognitionException {
}
// $ANTLR end RANGEOP
// $ANTLR start DECIMAL
public final void mDECIMAL() throws RecognitionException {
}
and repacked. It works fine.
2009/9/4 Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But
when
I
write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink
,some
exception thrown.
java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method:
mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080)
Who can give me an idea about the exception.
thanks.
2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
--- Mensagem encaminhada ---
De: codesite-nore...@google.com
Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to
whitelist
Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Version-1.2.5
Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add
javax.xml.stream
to
whitelist
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277
This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both
the
JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like
Woodstox.
Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE
now?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn
how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn
how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
--- Mensagem encaminhada --- De: codesite-nore...@google.com Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to whitelist Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300 Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Version-1.2.5 Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream to whitelist http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277 This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like Woodstox. Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now? -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when I write simple pagelink t:pagelink page=about about/t:pagelink ,some exception thrown. java.lang.VerifyError: (class: org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method: mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large at org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.parse(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1229) at org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.build(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1124) at org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.PropertyConduitSourceImpl.create(PropertyConduitSourceImpl.java:1080) Who can give me an idea about the exception. thanks. 2009/9/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com --- Mensagem encaminhada --- De: codesite-nore...@google.com Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to whitelist Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300 Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Version-1.2.5 Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add javax.xml.stream to whitelist http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1277 This has been fixed in the 1.2.5 release. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes Support for the Stax API, javax.xml.stream. You can now use both the JDK's Stax parser as well as third-party Stax libraries like Woodstox. Can anyone confirm that a vanilla Tapestry 5.1.0.5 works in GAE now? -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- regards, Jun Tsai
Re: Clarifiacations about Tapestry 5
Look at the tapestry nightly docs. It's mvn archetype:generate -DarchetypeCatalog= http://tapestry.formos.com/maven-repository If you want to use another version of tapestry you just have to change the appropriate property in the pom.xml. But for learning the nightly works just fine. 2009/4/19 kk4Nabble kavya@gmail.com Hi all, mvn archetype:create -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.tapestry -DarchetypeArtifactId =quickstart -DgroupId=org.apache.tapestry -DartifactId=tutorial1 -DpackageName=org.apache.tapestry5.tutorial I was trying the tapestry5 tutorial. I gave the above command it did not work. The META-INF/maven/archetype.xml descriptor cannot be found. Why did i get such an error? later I tried mvn archetype:generate -DarchetypeCatalog=http://tapestry.formos.com/maven-repository and it worked My question is.. Is it necessary to have a project template to start a project in Tapestry 5. What are these above artifactId archetypeArtifactId etc mean? What is the purpose of this project template. If anybody can tell more about this it will be helpfull. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Clarifiacations-about-Tapestry-5-tp23124901p23124901.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] metrics about tapestry-5 codebase quality
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:31 AM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: yes, that was the only point I would moan about ;) I once analyzed the package layout (from 5.0.18): http://aldana-online.de/screenshots/packageOverview.png You mean with 'left the barn', that you are package refactoring for 5.1.0? No, meaning that I can't refactor because too much is public, and the refactoring would break backwards compatibility. Howard Lewis Ship schrieb: Thanks. Having your dirty laundry out for all to see is very motivating. To be honest, one area of T5 that isn't so stirling is package layout, but that horse has left the barn. On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Onno Scheffers o...@piraya.nl wrote: Wow, this looks very good. My compliments to the Howard and the rest of the team. Every time I look an the Tapestry source code for something, I am impressed by how clean the code looks. Many commercial projects could learn a thing or two from Tapestry :o) regards, Onno On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:35 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: This confirms my gut feelings that tapestry framework itself is not only good but also its codebase :) http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.apache.tapestry:tapestry-project -- manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] metrics about tapestry-5 codebase quality
yes, that was the only point I would moan about ;) I once analyzed the package layout (from 5.0.18): http://aldana-online.de/screenshots/packageOverview.png You mean with 'left the barn', that you are package refactoring for 5.1.0? Howard Lewis Ship schrieb: Thanks. Having your dirty laundry out for all to see is very motivating. To be honest, one area of T5 that isn't so stirling is package layout, but that horse has left the barn. On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Onno Scheffers o...@piraya.nl wrote: Wow, this looks very good. My compliments to the Howard and the rest of the team. Every time I look an the Tapestry source code for something, I am impressed by how clean the code looks. Many commercial projects could learn a thing or two from Tapestry :o) regards, Onno On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:35 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: This confirms my gut feelings that tapestry framework itself is not only good but also its codebase :) http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.apache.tapestry:tapestry-project -- manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
[T5] metrics about tapestry-5 codebase quality
This confirms my gut feelings that tapestry framework itself is not only good but also its codebase :) http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.apache.tapestry:tapestry-project -- manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] metrics about tapestry-5 codebase quality
Wow, this looks very good. My compliments to the Howard and the rest of the team. Every time I look an the Tapestry source code for something, I am impressed by how clean the code looks. Many commercial projects could learn a thing or two from Tapestry :o) regards, Onno On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:35 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: This confirms my gut feelings that tapestry framework itself is not only good but also its codebase :) http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.apache.tapestry:tapestry-project -- manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] metrics about tapestry-5 codebase quality
Thanks. Having your dirty laundry out for all to see is very motivating. To be honest, one area of T5 that isn't so stirling is package layout, but that horse has left the barn. On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Onno Scheffers o...@piraya.nl wrote: Wow, this looks very good. My compliments to the Howard and the rest of the team. Every time I look an the Tapestry source code for something, I am impressed by how clean the code looks. Many commercial projects could learn a thing or two from Tapestry :o) regards, Onno On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:35 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: This confirms my gut feelings that tapestry framework itself is not only good but also its codebase :) http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.apache.tapestry:tapestry-project -- manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Blog post about Tapestry 5 - Project Structure
Great post, again! Andy Borut Bolčina schrieb: I made another post at http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ Task 2 – Explore the Tapestry 5 project structure and learn where to put your stuff I hope you don't consider this email as spam. Cheers, Borut - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Blog post about Tapestry 5 - Project Structure
I made another post at http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ Task 2 – Explore the Tapestry 5 project structure and learn where to put your stuff I hope you don't consider this email as spam. Cheers, Borut
Re: Blog post about Tapestry 5
Thanks to all, I have updated the post to include a case if you don't get listed all the arhetypes (including Tapestry quickstart). If anyone has an improvement to suggest please don't hesitate to leave a comment. Cheers, Borut 2008/12/18 Marcelo Lotif mlotifj...@gmail.com Very good, Borut, a really nice tutorial! It shows an alternative way to create a tapestry project, you should consider adding it to the wiki page. 2008/12/18 Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com I agree! The examples on the wiki and jumpstart have been my primary resource for learning the concepts of T5 hands on. The framework itself has been relatively easy to understand by reading the documentation. But when it comes to actual coding, it makes a huge difference with ready-to-use real world examples of things you actually need to do, like for example implementing a security regime for your application, or adjusting the message system to your needs. The wiki examples are still excellent and a great resource, but we need more, we need them to be user friendly and readable, and we need them to be very available! Great work by Borut here! Inge On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jan Vissers jan.viss...@cumquat.nl wrote: Borut Bolčina wrote: Hi, I'd like some feedback / proofreading on http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ as I want to smooth the first steps with Tapestry 5 for newbies (including me). I think you step to step environment set-up is really good and handily replace the now outdated T5 tutorial#1 ( http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tutorial1/ ). So, congratulation :) +1 Now T5 is GA - there should be a 'push' in community related activities like creating tutorials and examples the way you did! -- Francois Armand Etudes Développements J2EE Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 --- http://fanf42.blogspot.com InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ Open Source identities management and federation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Atenciosamente, Marcelo Lotif Programador Java e Tapestry FIEC - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Ceará (85) 3421-5910
Re: Blog post about Tapestry 5
Thanks, Borut, for this! I especially appreciate the depth you went to in discussing the use of the component message catalog with forms and how you can factor regexp validation entirely into the catalog. This is going to help some colleagues of mine become believers. Bill On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Borut Bolčina borut.bolc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to all, I have updated the post to include a case if you don't get listed all the arhetypes (including Tapestry quickstart). If anyone has an improvement to suggest please don't hesitate to leave a comment. Cheers, Borut 2008/12/18 Marcelo Lotif mlotifj...@gmail.com Very good, Borut, a really nice tutorial! It shows an alternative way to create a tapestry project, you should consider adding it to the wiki page. 2008/12/18 Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com I agree! The examples on the wiki and jumpstart have been my primary resource for learning the concepts of T5 hands on. The framework itself has been relatively easy to understand by reading the documentation. But when it comes to actual coding, it makes a huge difference with ready-to-use real world examples of things you actually need to do, like for example implementing a security regime for your application, or adjusting the message system to your needs. The wiki examples are still excellent and a great resource, but we need more, we need them to be user friendly and readable, and we need them to be very available! Great work by Borut here! Inge On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jan Vissers jan.viss...@cumquat.nl wrote: Borut Bolčina wrote: Hi, I'd like some feedback / proofreading on http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ as I want to smooth the first steps with Tapestry 5 for newbies (including me). I think you step to step environment set-up is really good and handily replace the now outdated T5 tutorial#1 ( http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tutorial1/ ). So, congratulation :) +1 Now T5 is GA - there should be a 'push' in community related activities like creating tutorials and examples the way you did! -- Francois Armand Etudes Développements J2EE Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 --- http://fanf42.blogspot.com InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ Open Source identities management and federation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Atenciosamente, Marcelo Lotif Programador Java e Tapestry FIEC - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Ceará (85) 3421-5910 -- Without coding you have no product Without testing, no quality Without refactoring, no future
Re: Blog post about Tapestry 5
Borut Bolčina wrote: Hi, I'd like some feedback / proofreading on http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ as I want to smooth the first steps with Tapestry 5 for newbies (including me). I think you step to step environment set-up is really good and handily replace the now outdated T5 tutorial#1 ( http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tutorial1/ ). So, congratulation :) -- Francois Armand Etudes Développements J2EE Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 --- http://fanf42.blogspot.com InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ Open Source identities management and federation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Blog post about Tapestry 5
Borut BolÄina wrote: Hi, I'd like some feedback / proofreading on http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ as I want to smooth the first steps with Tapestry 5 for newbies (including me). I think you step to step environment set-up is really good and handily replace the now outdated T5 tutorial#1 ( http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tutorial1/ ). So, congratulation :) +1 Now T5 is GA - there should be a 'push' in community related activities like creating tutorials and examples the way you did! -- Francois Armand Etudes Développements J2EE Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 --- http://fanf42.blogspot.com InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ Open Source identities management and federation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Blog post about Tapestry 5
I agree! The examples on the wiki and jumpstart have been my primary resource for learning the concepts of T5 hands on. The framework itself has been relatively easy to understand by reading the documentation. But when it comes to actual coding, it makes a huge difference with ready-to-use real world examples of things you actually need to do, like for example implementing a security regime for your application, or adjusting the message system to your needs. The wiki examples are still excellent and a great resource, but we need more, we need them to be user friendly and readable, and we need them to be very available! Great work by Borut here! Inge On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jan Vissers jan.viss...@cumquat.nlwrote: Borut Bolčina wrote: Hi, I'd like some feedback / proofreading on http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ as I want to smooth the first steps with Tapestry 5 for newbies (including me). I think you step to step environment set-up is really good and handily replace the now outdated T5 tutorial#1 ( http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tutorial1/ ). So, congratulation :) +1 Now T5 is GA - there should be a 'push' in community related activities like creating tutorials and examples the way you did! -- Francois Armand Etudes Développements J2EE Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 --- http://fanf42.blogspot.com InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ Open Source identities management and federation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Blog post about Tapestry 5
Very good, Borut, a really nice tutorial! It shows an alternative way to create a tapestry project, you should consider adding it to the wiki page. 2008/12/18 Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com I agree! The examples on the wiki and jumpstart have been my primary resource for learning the concepts of T5 hands on. The framework itself has been relatively easy to understand by reading the documentation. But when it comes to actual coding, it makes a huge difference with ready-to-use real world examples of things you actually need to do, like for example implementing a security regime for your application, or adjusting the message system to your needs. The wiki examples are still excellent and a great resource, but we need more, we need them to be user friendly and readable, and we need them to be very available! Great work by Borut here! Inge On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jan Vissers jan.viss...@cumquat.nl wrote: Borut Bolčina wrote: Hi, I'd like some feedback / proofreading on http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ as I want to smooth the first steps with Tapestry 5 for newbies (including me). I think you step to step environment set-up is really good and handily replace the now outdated T5 tutorial#1 ( http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tutorial1/ ). So, congratulation :) +1 Now T5 is GA - there should be a 'push' in community related activities like creating tutorials and examples the way you did! -- Francois Armand Etudes Développements J2EE Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28 --- http://fanf42.blogspot.com InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/ Open Source identities management and federation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Atenciosamente, Marcelo Lotif Programador Java e Tapestry FIEC - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Ceará (85) 3421-5910
Blog post about Tapestry 5
Hi, I'd like some feedback / proofreading on http://bbwebcraft.blogspot.com/ as I want to smooth the first steps with Tapestry 5 for newbies (including me). Cheers, Borut
Re: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
Wow, that's a mighty fine article! :) -Filip On 2008-05-11 20:58, Renat Zubairov wrote: Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
Very nice! This is needed! 2008/5/12 Filip S. Adamsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wow, that's a mighty fine article! :) -Filip On 2008-05-11 20:58, Renat Zubairov wrote: Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
Renat, add it to the wiki! http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5HowTos 2008/5/12 Ted Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Very nice! This is needed! 2008/5/12 Filip S. Adamsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wow, that's a mighty fine article! :) -Filip On 2008-05-11 20:58, Renat Zubairov wrote: Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Atenciosamente, Marcelo Lotif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
I think further parts of the article will follow :) There are a lot of things we could write about. On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Ted Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Very nice! This is needed! 2008/5/12 Filip S. Adamsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wow, that's a mighty fine article! :) -Filip On 2008-05-11 20:58, Renat Zubairov wrote: Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko
Re: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
@Marcelo - Done! Thanks for the Tip! Renat 2008/5/12 Marcelo Lotif [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Renat, add it to the wiki! http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5HowTos 2008/5/12 Ted Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Very nice! This is needed! 2008/5/12 Filip S. Adamsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wow, that's a mighty fine article! :) -Filip On 2008-05-11 20:58, Renat Zubairov wrote: Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Atenciosamente, Marcelo Lotif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Renat Zubairov
[ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) -- Best regards, Renat Zubairov and Igor Drobazko
Re: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
Great article guys - well done! Toby - Original Message From: Renat Zubairov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Cc: Igor Drobiazko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 11 May, 2008 7:58:50 PM Subject: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5 Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) -- Best regards, Renat Zubairov and Igor Drobazko
Re: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5
Great article and help us newbie much. Thank you! DH - Original Message - From: Renat Zubairov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Cc: Igor Drobiazko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 2:58 AM Subject: [ANN] New article about Tapestry 5 Hello All, My self and Igor Drobiazko are proud to present our new article about Tapestry 5: Tapestry for Nonbelievers published on InfoQ http://www.infoq.com/articles/tapestry5-intro Special thanks to Howard in helping with the article and creating such a great tool :) -- Best regards, Renat Zubairov and Igor Drobazko
Re: About Tapestry 5 ?
Yep, I haven't figured out the documentation angle. I'm thinking in terms of a Maven plugin to generate the component documentation directly from the source code annotations javadoc. One advantage is that you have the source and the core components are in org.apache.tapestry.corelib.components (effectively, by definition, they can't live elsewhere). The documentation is, yes, mostly conceptual/brain dump (but it does exist!). I have a start on a tutorial but I may be shifting gears to have the tutorials up on DeveloperWorks. That's stil in an early negotation stage. As a last resort, the test suite shows how a lot of things work. On 2/14/07, DJ Gredler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been trying it out over the past week or so, and my impression of the documentation is that it's a brain dump of how things work in general, but when you get down to basic questions like is there a label component? if so, how does it work? is there a select component? if so, how does it work? you end up having to go to google and search along the lines of label site: tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5. I like what comes out once you figure out how things work, though. The one other thing I've had trouble with is contributing to the application configuration... I have a search page which I want to render sometimes even when the URL doesn't contain the page name, and I had to do some major digging into the internal configuration to figure out how to do it. What I ended up with made heavy use of internal Tapestry classes, so this seems like an area that may not yet be complete. Overall it reminds me of Maven 2 at this point... slightly aggravating to figure out at first, but possibly a time saver in the long run. On 2/14/07, Dwi Ardi Irawan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've heard about tapestry 5 preview release, what i want to ask : is tapestry 5 ready to be used in production ? thnx. dwi ardi irawan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About Tapestry 5 ?
preview == alpha == everything subject to change In practice, what's existing and public is not changing, we're just adding more and more. On 2/13/07, Dwi Ardi Irawan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've heard about tapestry 5 preview release, what i want to ask : is tapestry 5 ready to be used in production ? thnx. dwi ardi irawan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About Tapestry 5 ?
On 2/14/07, Dwi Ardi Irawan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've heard about tapestry 5 preview release, what i want to ask : is tapestry 5 ready to be used in production ? By my point of view the features it has are really consistent and stable. It lacks a lot features compared to T4 but they will come. One point, probably the one i most appreciate, is it's really easy to work with T5. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About Tapestry 5 ?
On 2/14/07, Eugene Lozovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Just wanted to ask, have anybody used T5+Hibernate w/o Spring? Me right now. But I'm pretty sure someone else is doing great stuff with that couple. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About Tapestry 5 ?
I've been trying it out over the past week or so, and my impression of the documentation is that it's a brain dump of how things work in general, but when you get down to basic questions like is there a label component? if so, how does it work? is there a select component? if so, how does it work? you end up having to go to google and search along the lines of label site: tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5. I like what comes out once you figure out how things work, though. The one other thing I've had trouble with is contributing to the application configuration... I have a search page which I want to render sometimes even when the URL doesn't contain the page name, and I had to do some major digging into the internal configuration to figure out how to do it. What I ended up with made heavy use of internal Tapestry classes, so this seems like an area that may not yet be complete. Overall it reminds me of Maven 2 at this point... slightly aggravating to figure out at first, but possibly a time saver in the long run. On 2/14/07, Dwi Ardi Irawan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've heard about tapestry 5 preview release, what i want to ask : is tapestry 5 ready to be used in production ? thnx. dwi ardi irawan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About Tapestry 5 ?
i've heard about tapestry 5 preview release, what i want to ask : is tapestry 5 ready to be used in production ? thnx. dwi ardi irawan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
