Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone
While I do find the conversation about journalism interesting I find the most important point to be something entirely different. What rights do we have to be secure in our property... particularly our videos and other intellectual property. If the police can sopena Josh's video footage anytime they like like he was a survelience camera... then why not his computer... We could just go around and make a grand jury on domestic terrorism... and make anyone we think who we've suspected has talked to the ELF (environmental liberation front) or any group... and send them a sopoena for all their video, their computers, and any audio recordings... basically we can turn any individual in the U.S. into a tool of survielence for the CIA, FBI or any other government group and without due process. The governement was not looking for info specific to one crime, they wanted Josh's footage so they could identify people in it... basic survielence. Josh even offered to let them review the tapes in the presence of the court... but they obviously wanted his footage for purposes unrelated. Furthermore... on a state level Josh Wolf would have been protected by shield laws... the fact that this was a federal grand jury trumped his rights under the state. Basically it's a big issue of due process. I'm not even going to say wether Josh was right or wrong... but I both respect him and am tremendously grateful to him that he's driving the discussion and pressing the point. The bottom line is this... there has been plenty of understanding of due process when it comes to physical property. Our right to be secure in our physical property... say a diary... our mail. But as we move into intellectual property it gets stickier and stickier. Phone tapping was one thing... but now that our means of communication also become self archiving like email, video, photos, and audio... we have very important NEW considerations because now the governent can sopoena not just records of meta information like who you called... but increasingly records of what was said... in email, audio recordings, video footage, photos. The funny thing is more of this information is public on our blogs, video and photosharing sites, twiter... and all over. This alone gives the institutions of law enforcement and intelligence tremendous new powers and tools... I'm not so convinced... well... I'm downright opposed to the idea that they also need new liberties and are cutting through the red tape of due process to get at our personal data. In a world where the last two years of communications and even IM transcripts are in my gmail account... I'm VERY VERY concerned about how easy legislation is making it to dig into my personal information and for what reason. To me what josh wolf's case screams is we the citizens cannot be turned into survielence tools of the state. There has to be a much more well define and rigorous due process of how they can gain access to our private communications histories and for what reasons. If the police are given a warrant for your home it's given for a specific purpose... i.e. they can't be given a warrant to search for a gun and confiscate your entire computer... this is essentially what they did to josh wolf... they claimed they wanted his footage to look for information specifically related to a crime... he testified as to the content of that footage and he offered to let them review it in the presence of the court for said content. In refusing to comply they gave away their true and unspecified intentions. It's an extremely slippery slope. Peace, -Mike mmeiser.com/blog On 4/5/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an interesting area of discussion. While Josh says that the idea of objectivity in journalism is the problem. He also states his supreme interest is in the truth. I haven't seen these highly abstract ideas thoroughly explained which leads people to different conclusions on what Josh and others mean. I don't see journalism fulfilling objectivity -- having a faulty claim to that idea. Objectivity requires peer review of source data. The information gathered from news organizations is held mostly in secrecy in the businesses which guarantees a significant lack of objectivity, since the data can't be independently evaluated. There is a problem of protecting sources -- but that can to a large extent be solved by disguising names. It's more the need of news businesses to scoop each other gain a edge by holding information secretive that's the problem. The problem is not objectivity in itself, but not adequately fulfilling it's requirements. The danger I fear is a false objectivity is attacked and thrown out, rather than corrected to offer transparent information that can corrected toward objectivity. -- Enric Cirne http://cirne.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting article
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hyperlinks in Video
regarding vpip, smil, rss and hyperlinks that recipe was tried last year on a prototype site i had tossed up for experimenting. http://vlogwall.com/vodcasts doesnt work great though. I have been trying to get Jeroen to have his flash player understand SMIL in addition to RSS and XSPF. that would be splendicious ;) sull On 4/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still hoping vPIP from Enric keeps evolving... there should be a way to make put a wrapper such as SMIL around pretty much any video file... or use flash to wrap flash... so you can pass vPIP info.. like a url... or even more advanced... specify and RSS feed when you call vPIP, and have vpip display the last three posts from that RSS feed (maybe even their thumbnails) and link directly to them. Ultimately if I understand the larger issues with this discussion we need some sort of distributed and transparent means for independant videobloggers to compete with youtube's recommendation engine. Which is to say when a video ends some sort of dynamicly generated screen should come up recommending like videos or other videos from your videoblog. I think vPIP could do this. -Mike mmeiser.com/blog mefeedia.com On 4/7/07, Kath O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] aliak77%40gmail.com wrote: Hi Nick, sorry to hear you're having problems with the tutorials. the one posted in the link below is a bit disjointed as I haven't uploaded the images to go with them so it's harder to follow. maybe the word doc in the zip file might be better as it has examples (this an rtf version are attached to the post/link below). these are for quicktime. basically it's creating a text file/text track using the correct codes and reinserting it back into the qt movie. once u've done it a couple of times it's pretty straightforward but is fiddly the first couple of times as it's not a one-step action. so using the other software mentioned in this thread is probably a more straightforward method. I found Andreas' linkubator very good also. ( for smil examples). but if u do perservere with the tutorial have problems let me know and I'll see if I can help out (others here would be able to also) http://www.aliak.com/files/hyperlinks-doc.zip cheers kath On 4/4/07, Nick Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] cunas4%40hotmail.com wrote: Thanks I will try to reach Andreas... I tried working on these tutorials last night: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/tutorials/hreftracks.html http://www.aliak.com/node/2439 and I couldn't get it to work.. Maybe, I'm just not that skilled yet. Nick -- http://www.aliak.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] twittering posts
Den 09.04.2007 kl. 01:28 skrev Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly-videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. Or it's been an Easter holiday week. :o) -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
[videoblogging] Apple TV - test HD feed
Anyone have an Apple TV hooked up to and HDTV that is willing to test our HD feed for Noodle Scar? Or just to test the HD feed on the Apple TV? Any help will be greatly appreciated. http://noodlescar.com/daily/subscribe/ - then click on the easy subscribe link or icon for Apple TV HD. -Lan www.LanBui.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone
A slippery slope is from the angle of whose looking. There is no absolute right that any social group has: government prosecutors, journalists, citizen, et. al. The decision is judged by the situation based on human rights and values. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While I do find the conversation about journalism interesting I find the most important point to be something entirely different. What rights do we have to be secure in our property... particularly our videos and other intellectual property. If the police can sopena Josh's video footage anytime they like like he was a survelience camera... then why not his computer... We could just go around and make a grand jury on domestic terrorism... and make anyone we think who we've suspected has talked to the ELF (environmental liberation front) or any group... and send them a sopoena for all their video, their computers, and any audio recordings... basically we can turn any individual in the U.S. into a tool of survielence for the CIA, FBI or any other government group and without due process. The governement was not looking for info specific to one crime, they wanted Josh's footage so they could identify people in it... basic survielence. Josh even offered to let them review the tapes in the presence of the court... but they obviously wanted his footage for purposes unrelated. Furthermore... on a state level Josh Wolf would have been protected by shield laws... the fact that this was a federal grand jury trumped his rights under the state. Basically it's a big issue of due process. I'm not even going to say wether Josh was right or wrong... but I both respect him and am tremendously grateful to him that he's driving the discussion and pressing the point. The bottom line is this... there has been plenty of understanding of due process when it comes to physical property. Our right to be secure in our physical property... say a diary... our mail. But as we move into intellectual property it gets stickier and stickier. Phone tapping was one thing... but now that our means of communication also become self archiving like email, video, photos, and audio... we have very important NEW considerations because now the governent can sopoena not just records of meta information like who you called... but increasingly records of what was said... in email, audio recordings, video footage, photos. The funny thing is more of this information is public on our blogs, video and photosharing sites, twiter... and all over. This alone gives the institutions of law enforcement and intelligence tremendous new powers and tools... I'm not so convinced... well... I'm downright opposed to the idea that they also need new liberties and are cutting through the red tape of due process to get at our personal data. In a world where the last two years of communications and even IM transcripts are in my gmail account... I'm VERY VERY concerned about how easy legislation is making it to dig into my personal information and for what reason. To me what josh wolf's case screams is we the citizens cannot be turned into survielence tools of the state. There has to be a much more well define and rigorous due process of how they can gain access to our private communications histories and for what reasons. If the police are given a warrant for your home it's given for a specific purpose... i.e. they can't be given a warrant to search for a gun and confiscate your entire computer... this is essentially what they did to josh wolf... they claimed they wanted his footage to look for information specifically related to a crime... he testified as to the content of that footage and he offered to let them review it in the presence of the court for said content. In refusing to comply they gave away their true and unspecified intentions. It's an extremely slippery slope. Peace, -Mike mmeiser.com/blog On 4/5/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an interesting area of discussion. While Josh says that the idea of objectivity in journalism is the problem. He also states his supreme interest is in the truth. I haven't seen these highly abstract ideas thoroughly explained which leads people to different conclusions on what Josh and others mean. I don't see journalism fulfilling objectivity -- having a faulty claim to that idea. Objectivity requires peer review of source data. The information gathered from news organizations is held mostly in secrecy in the businesses which guarantees a significant lack of objectivity, since the data can't be independently evaluated. There is a problem of protecting sources -- but that can to a large extent be solved by disguising names. It's more the need of news businesses to scoop each other gain a edge by holding information secretive that's the problem. The
Re: [videoblogging] twittering posts
And none among you posted the link to said post. Tut. Tut. Jan On 4/8/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes Twitter. Ryanne and I were looking at the hummingbirds outside the window here and she remembered your post. Those of you not on twitter you might want to consider it. To me it's kind of like a big 24/7 irc chat (but much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly-videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. - Verdi http://twitter.com/michaelverdi On 4/8/07, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all, i just wanted to share what i thought was an interesting occurrence. a few days ago, i started to getting some comments on one of my older apperceptions posts i figured that something was up that was making people to do that, but I did not know what not sure why, but i guessed that it was something ryanne had done turned out i was right. unknown to me at the time, she had twittered the post thanks ryanne! and thanks to all of you who have shared your thoughts and asked about buddy. i'm sad to say he has yet to return home. but i am also happy to see him in that video, to recall the magic of that hummingbird and for all the great comments from friends. i've never been twitter-dotted before. have others had this happen? markus -- http://SpinXpress.com/Markus_Sandy http://Ourmedia.org/Markus_Sandy -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] twittering posts
Despite the holiday, been lotsa Twittering goin' on (your oneliner yesterday did not go unnoticed, btw). Twitter's brought folks together for real-time digital and meatspace events. Verdi enticed Colan and me from Twitter to SL where we held a planning session for a machinima project of his. Insta-reviews of parties / restaurants for SXSW and PodCampNY. Instant responses to new vlog posts. Pretty darned cool. Jan P.S. Turn on phone Twitters at your own risk :) On 4/9/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Den 09.04.2007 kl. 01:28 skrev Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly-videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. Or it's been an Easter holiday week. :o) -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Couple retiring from NYC to Arizona... and taking cab.
Wow. Makes me wish I hadn't obligations this week, or I'd definitely go. Road trip! Jan On 4/8/07, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sorry, but this story SCREAMS for a video blogger to go with them, with a simple camera, laptop, and broadband card. They are retiring--think of the stories of their lives, things that happened to them in New York, thoughts of their children and grandchildren... and, of course, the cabbie's side. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/08/taxi.move.ap/index.html Susan http://vlog.kitykity.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/fauxpress [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] my videoblogging2007 contribution
A lovely day - enjoyed vicariously. Thanks for sharing it. Jan [a SINK - single income, no kids] On 4/6/07, Jim Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi group, It's been a very busy week for me so i was only able to do one video. I hope enjoy the video: http://vergenewmedia.com/2007/04/06/disconnecting-from-the-digital-world/ happy vlogging! (shot on Canon Powershot A630) Jim Long It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/fauxpress [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Archiving Files
This is a HUGE problem for me just now as I begin to shoot / edit more critical footage. Know I will want to recycle some old project footage for new projects, so shots must be searchable and findable. Hope this discussion proceeds into some depth as we all will face the same solution-finding dilemma. I'm getting that terrabyte drive soon. But what - exactly - to do with it? Can't continue much longer without a solid searchable archiving / backup workflow in place. Jan On 4/7/07, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you're shooting DV or another format with timecode, using FCP or Avid to edit, and making sure to log your clips with correct reel names/number, just archive the project files, which don't take much space. The tapes then become your video backup, since you can always recapture offline clips. If you're also using stills and audio files, those will need to be backed up as well since they don't have timecode. Brook ___ Brook Hinton film/video/audio art www.brookhinton.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/fauxpress [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] TRIVOP LOOKING FOR VLOGGERS ALL AROUND THE WORLD
Hello, Trivop.com is the first videoguide for hotels. We're developping the biggest network of cameraman, vloggers, production companies interest by new business opportunities. Hotels will all have videos on their website in next few years so there's a huge new market out there for you. Many hotels are contacting TRivop for their production needs. Join the first network of filmmakers for the hotel industry. Joint Trivop. The only thing you have to do is subscibre for FREE on www.trivop.com/filmmakers Thomas
[videoblogging] Re: Andy Carvin and Jonny Goldstein Rocked the House at Nonprofit Tech Conferenc
Regarding your delayed vbweek07 videos I'd say absolutely post them. You did them between April 1-7 right? No problem. Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Beth Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Andy Carvin and Jonny Goldstein did a session and drop in skills coaching clinic at the Nonprofit Technology Conference in Washington, DC. They did a fabulous job! I've already heard from a number of people who were at the session that they are going to go out and video blog on behalf of their nonprofit or social change organization ... Some videos they made: http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2007/04/project_hope_international.html Demo video we made during session http://www.jonnygoldstein.com/2007/04/06/ntc-videogeekout-demo-video/ Session wiki http://ntcvideogeekout.pbwiki.com/ Beth Kanter PS I have my videos done for video blogging week, but didn't have Internet in my room - so couldn't post - is it too late to get them all up now ..
Re: [videoblogging] twittering posts
On 4/9/07, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And none among you posted the link to said post. Tut. Tut. Jan Twitter doesn't have a search. :( Here's the post: http://twitter.com/Ryanne/statuses/21535811 -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
[videoblogging] clear sounding music videos from a webcam
hi videobloggers, over the weekend i got to wondering if it's possible to create a clear sounding music video using a $30 webcam. i discovered that it's possible to do so, although it takes a few extra steps. i've detailed my experiments at http://tinyurl.com/27afe4 phil shapiro washington dc -- Phil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.digitaldivide.net/profile/pshapiro http://philsrssfeed.blogspot.com http://www.his.com/pshapiro/stories.menu.html Wisdom starts with wonder. - Socrates Learning happens through gentleness.
Re: [videoblogging] twittering posts
When I first heard of Twitter a while ago, I thought it was the dumbest thing ever -- yeah, who in the world would want to constantly post what I'm doing for IM? I'm not a teenager. I hate MySpace. I like talking to real people in the real world. Aren't we already fragmented and fast enough? IMing 140 characters at a time -- won't that just exacerbate the problems of modern society?? Then at SXSW, Twitter was unavoidable. A lot of people were excited about it -- so I signed up to try it out. I understood quickly how valuable it is in a group-event situation like a conference. If you had Twitter deliver to your phone, you could keep up with who was were -- even with people you don't know well, but would like to. It's a tool for being the coolest kid on the block, knowing which party or panel or place for dinner is the best. It lets you just magically show up at the party where the people you want to be with are... you can intentionally run into someone at a restaurant and join them -- I wondered post-SXSW if I'd use Twitter in my regular life. I wondered if it had any value outside a technology conference, or a college campus (where you more easily find your friends), or such physically contained places. Two weeks later (and still without a IM phone plan -- so I only use Twitter from my computer), I have to say I absolutely LOVE IT! -- I LOVE TWITTER!! Why?? Well, its a super fast way to keep little tiny tabs on people who I care about, who are in other cities from me. When I'm on, it's a kind of constant connection. It's like being in the same house with someone when you aren't talking or doing anything together, but you are simply there together. I've noticed I check my email a lot less. I try to leave email alone so I can focus on one thing at a time, but frequently I get just bored enough or lonely enough while working (usual by myself) that I start checking the email compulsively. Which is never satisfying. I'm looking for connections to people / to my friends, and I end up with lots of junk, extraneous information, and people asking me for things -- which raises my stress level, overwhelms my brain, and creates little sense of community. Twitter on the other hand, does create community. It's just little bits of saying hi. Hi. I'm here. You are there. There's 3500 miles between us / 150 miles / 2000 miles, but I see you. We are both bored working out css bugs, or compressing videos, or trying to burn DVDs. Banal stuff. Not worth calling anyone or emailing anyone to say -- but I'll say it to the vague out there world. Hm. Meh. Hi. This is how it's going for me right now. I've called and skyped people a lot more since using Twitter -- having a small connection already open, I then want to say more or ask more + switch over to voice / live video. Which is cool. Rather than feeling disconnected and using the voice to connect -- it's like we are already connected and using the voice to take it deeper. I've even started new friendships that first started on twitter. I would have NEVER thought that was possible. Of course this only works with other geeks -- so it has no affect on all the relationships I have with non-geeks. And who knows what will happen over time. I wonder about a lot of things about it -- like do I want people I don't know subscribing to my twitter feed? How public do I want to be / writing as a celebrity to fans, or how private do I want to be, writing as a friend to friends (and therefore being more casual / showing raw emotion more, rather than curating what to express). I like it that geek communities take on new technology as an experiment, using ourselves as the test animals. Twitter is still a big experiment -- one that I am enjoying very much. Jen Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jensimmons.com http://milkweedmediadesign.com 267-235-6967 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] twittering posts
Twitter itself doesn't have search, but others have been experimenting with building twitter search engines - here are two: http://google.com/coop/cse?cx=004053080137224009376%3Aicdh3tsqkzy http://google.com/coop/cse?cx=004053080137224009376%253Aicdh3tsqkzy and http://twittermap.com/search David (http://twitter.com/davidleeking) On 4/9/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/9/07, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] jannie.jan%40gmail.com wrote: And none among you posted the link to said post. Tut. Tut. Jan Twitter doesn't have a search. :( Here's the post: http://twitter.com/Ryanne/statuses/21535811 -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs -- David King davidleeking.com - blog http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Code Of Conduct for Bloggers
From the New York Times http://tinyurl.com/38c8lx It's nice to know that MSM is only two weeks behind the times. Tony Katz http://www.talkshowonthego.com http://www.aweli.com
Re: [videoblogging] Code Of Conduct for Bloggers
Hello, It's funny how the definition of the word censorship has been changing. AFAICT, it used to be about Freedom, but it changed into a (forced) Right. I.e., it used to be about Government NOT using coercion against you when you spoke. But now it's about forcing people to listen to you when you speak. (Like forcing people to keep comments on their blog, etc.) See ya On 4/9/07, tony.katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the New York Times http://tinyurl.com/38c8lx It's nice to know that MSM is only two weeks behind the times. Tony Katz http://www.talkshowonthego.com http://www.aweli.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Code Of Conduct for Bloggers
I know, I don't understand how deleting a comment from a blog amounts to an attack on free speach. I have deleted comments, they where all spam comments, but I still deleted them. Did I violate the spammer's free speach? If you go by some's definition, I just did. I understand the fear is that there will be no dialogue but how can you have a real dialogue when you sometimes don't even know who you are talking to? Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, It's funny how the definition of the word censorship has been changing. AFAICT, it used to be about Freedom, but it changed into a (forced) Right. I.e., it used to be about Government NOT using coercion against you when you spoke. But now it's about forcing people to listen to you when you speak. (Like forcing people to keep comments on their blog, etc.) See ya On 4/9/07, tony.katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the New York Times http://tinyurl.com/38c8lx It's nice to know that MSM is only two weeks behind the times. Tony Katz http://www.talkshowonthego.com http://www.aweli.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ __ _ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ __ _ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Code Of Conduct for Bloggers
The right of free speech (in the US anyway) can only be violated by the government. Meaning it would be unconstitutional for the government to regulate speech. You are allowed to regulate speech within your own domain--you own house, business, blog, or publications you own or control. Sometimes social pressure is extended to certain people/organizations to stifle or not restrict certain speech within their own domain--but that's social pressure, not force of law by a government. There is a big difference. Example: some political blogs might delete comments made by people with opposing views, there isn't anything illegal about this--it might be viewed as intelectually dishonest and people might complain, but no ones rights are violated. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know, I don't understand how deleting a comment from a blog amounts to an attack on free speach. I have deleted comments, they where all spam comments, but I still deleted them. Did I violate the spammer's free speach? If you go by some's definition, I just did. I understand the fear is that there will be no dialogue but how can you have a real dialogue when you sometimes don't even know who you are talking to? Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, It's funny how the definition of the word censorship has been changing. AFAICT, it used to be about Freedom, but it changed into a (forced) Right. I.e., it used to be about Government NOT using coercion against you when you spoke. But now it's about forcing people to listen to you when you speak. (Like forcing people to keep comments on their blog, etc.) See ya On 4/9/07, tony.katz tony.katz@ wrote: From the New York Times http://tinyurl.com/38c8lx It's nice to know that MSM is only two weeks behind the times. Tony Katz http://www.talkshowonthego.com http://www.aweli.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ _ _ _ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ _ _ _ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Who's Attending NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) in Vegas?
Just checking to see who's attending NAB this year. It looks like they're really expanding their programs/products to benefit anyone creating content online. In fact, they're calling this weekend their Podcasting Summit. Hayden Black of Goodnight Burbank is giving the keynote. We're taping an episode of our show, Viral, from NAB with a particular emphasis on the Podcasting Summit. We'd like to meet up with vloggers/podcasters attending the event and perhaps walk the exhibit floor to see what new products are being offered and if it truly benefits people creating online content. So, if you're planning to attend- please let me know! Exhibit passes are free but you have to register quickly at www.nabshow.com. Thanks, Sunny Gault Viral, Producer/Host www.viraltheshow.com
Re: [videoblogging] Skype on Cell
Mike: yes, you can use it with your laptop too (for that same $40/mo). I'm using it on my Macbook Pro, which works in a pinch, but I wouldn't rely on it... and I'm usually using a usb cable b/c bluetooth is pretty flakey on my phone. I hear better results with Windows laptops. Also, it's not as fast as one of those wireless cards for your laptop, but still much better than 'stealing data' like I used to do. Rex On 4/8/07, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/8/07, Rex Pechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpechler%40gmail.com wrote: Any windows mobile phone should work at least, others probably as well. Skype makes a WM client for sure, as I have it (and it works well, even with bluetooth) on my Treo 700w from Verizon. My phone doesn't have WiFi, but I pay $40/mo for unlimited data. Rex, that $40/mo for unlimited data, can you use it with your laptop too? And is that 3G data? If so what sort of actual data rates do you get through it. I'm using Sprint Vision... but they don't let me use it with my laptop (I do anyway when I need it), I haven't used it with my laptop in a while, but over the years it has increased quite a bit in speed. Last time I used it I was getting about 15k a second. The big problem of course is latency. Anyway... I'm sick of Sprint... never liked them... pay them way to much... and still I have to steal data... I'm always looking for an opportunity to ditch them. Haven't heard very good things about Verizon either. -Mike mmeiser.com/blog mefeedia.com Rex On 4/7/07, jean-marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] docp%40spacegeek.org wrote: A skilled pickpocket got my cellphone in the metro in Paris. Iwas half hoping for this so now I can shop for a cell that would enable Skype. I see there are some services like Eqo that allow you to use skype as long as your computer is on, but I don't leave my computer on when I'm away. I want my cell to be independent of my computer. I might be vulnerable to wifi hotspots, but nothing's perfect. Any suggestions of what to buy set up so I can use Skype on a cell? -- http://www.rexpechler.com/ Mobile: 650-207-1058 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://www.rexpechler.com/ Mobile: 650-207-1058 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Need advice on how to conduct an interview for use on a blog.
Hi, can anyone recommend any books or articles, etc, that give advice on how to conduct an interview with a guest. I am looking for tips on things to do, and not do during an interview with a guest, from the perspective of being the host. OK, thanks, Ed.
Re: [videoblogging] twittering posts
Now I am certain web2.0 has jumped the shark. :) On 4/9/07, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Twitter itself doesn't have search, but others have been experimenting with building twitter search engines - here are two: http://google.com/coop/cse?cx=004053080137224009376%3Aicdh3tsqkzy http://google.com/coop/cse?cx=004053080137224009376%253Aicdh3tsqkzy and http://twittermap.com/search David (http://twitter.com/davidleeking) On 4/9/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/9/07, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] jannie.jan%40gmail.com wrote: And none among you posted the link to said post. Tut. Tut. Jan Twitter doesn't have a search. :( Here's the post: http://twitter.com/Ryanne/statuses/21535811 -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs -- David King davidleeking.com - blog http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] what happens when cops are wrong
..something I felt like sharing - kinda made me wanna say h. Its been plenty of times that have been shared over the web when people are mistreated or mishandled by the cops or other forms of authority. This youtube clip in particular just shows how backwards and corrupt some of OUR law enforcement agencies are and where their real priorities are. Although this may be comical in it s deliverance of the prank - i don't think it deserved the end result. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7snbtwG5wcmode=relatedsearch= http://www.oneinthehand.blogspot.com The only Treo Training Video Cast in the World [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Need advice on how to conduct an interview for use on a blog.
Hi, can anyone recommend any books or articles, etc, that give advice on how to conduct an interview with a guest. I am looking for tips on things to do, and not do during an interview with a guest, from the perspective of being the host. OK, thanks, Ed. Creative Cow Magazine covered this in...I think it was their February issue. The big thing to remember is that it's the guest who's the focus, not you, so just ask a question and let the guest riff. If you need to steer them back onto an intended topic, just ask a follow up question, but let the guest run. Also, prep is good. Lots of guests appreciate knowing the questions you'll be asking in advance, and this gives you both time to work out what angle the interview will be taking. Working out the questions in advance, and even writing them down, can be good because it gives you a chance to ensure you've got all your bases covered. Draw up an outline of points, if it helps you think of more questions. Also, too much is better than not enough. It's better to have an interview go long than it is to have missed a major point. Other than that, just remember you're there to let the guest talk, and it'll go fine. Unless it's a hostile interview, in which case, disregard that. :) -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime
[videoblogging] question about using vpip in a wordpress blog
Hi folks, have any of you (besides Enric) used his VPIP inside a wordpress blog? I put it up but it seems want to have me save the video rather than just play it - in it's enclosure. Here's the vlog: http://realrez.wordpress.com Thanks folks, Milt Lee
Re: [videoblogging] question about using vpip in a wordpress blog
Hi Milt, I have used vPIP on a few blogs and, from what I can tell, vPIP either isn't installed or it isn't enabled on your blog. For reference, I didn't see any calls to a vpip javascript or anything from cirne. You might want to double-check your install. As a side note, I'm very glad you posted here, as I was unaware of your project. I majored in Justice Studies/Pre-Law, with a focus on Native American Law. I truly look forward to watching what you've put together. Regards, Josh -- joshpaul.com On 4/9/07, Milt Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, have any of you (besides Enric) used his VPIP inside a wordpress blog? I put it up but it seems want to have me save the video rather than just play it - in it's enclosure. Here's the vlog: http://realrez.wordpress.com Thanks folks, Milt Lee Messages in this topic http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/59217;_ylc=X3oDMTM3MG1udWpwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRtc2dJZAM1OTIxNwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzExNzYxNTc1NTgEdHBjSWQDNTkyMTc-( 1) Reply (via web post) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJycXA3bmFtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRtc2dJZAM1OTIxNwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNycGx5BHN0aW1lAzExNzYxNTc1NTg-?act=replymessageNum=59217| Start a new topic http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZzExYzFwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzExNzYxNTc1NTg- Messageshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJmaDdubHZ1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNtc2dzBHN0aW1lAzExNzYxNTc1NTg-| Linkshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJnODM5aW41BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNsaW5rcwRzdGltZQMxMTc2MTU3NTU4| Pollshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/polls;_ylc=X3oDMTJnN2YwaDBiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNwb2xscwRzdGltZQMxMTc2MTU3NTU4 [image: Yahoo! Groups]http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbXBubnN2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTE3NjE1NzU1OA-- Change settings via the Webhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJnN2xrMmg2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNzdG5ncwRzdGltZQMxMTc2MTU3NTU4(Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest[EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Digest| Switch format to Traditional[EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Traditional Visit Your Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNjAzcW40BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNocGYEc3RpbWUDMTE3NjE1NzU1OA--| Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ | Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recent Activity - 13 New Membershttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJnZWF0NmFqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxMTc2MTU3NTU4 - 1 New Linkshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJoMzNjMW44BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bGlua3MEc3RpbWUDMTE3NjE1NzU1OA-- Visit Your Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcWFyMzh1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyODA1NjY2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTU1NDAyMQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzExNzYxNTc1NTg- SPONSORED LINKS - Individualhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads;_ylc=X3oDMTJkMmVqc25zBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzEEZ3JwSWQDMTI4MDU2NjYEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NTU0MDIxBHNlYwNzbG1vZARzdGltZQMxMTc2MTU3NTU4?t=msk=Individualw1=Individualw2=Individual+counselingw3=Individual+health+planw4=Individual+income+taxw5=Individual+income+tax+returnc=5s=132g=2.sig=yXas2gOCx2ryEsBih067Ww - Individual counselinghttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads;_ylc=X3oDMTJkaGdkbjcwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzIEZ3JwSWQDMTI4MDU2NjYEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NTU0MDIxBHNlYwNzbG1vZARzdGltZQMxMTc2MTU3NTU4?t=msk=Individual+counselingw1=Individualw2=Individual+counselingw3=Individual+health+planw4=Individual+income+taxw5=Individual+income+tax+returnc=5s=132g=2.sig=yO-t9-v0D93UF70blMCxpA - Individual health planhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads;_ylc=X3oDMTJkZm85MXI0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzMEZ3JwSWQDMTI4MDU2NjYEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NTU0MDIxBHNlYwNzbG1vZARzdGltZQMxMTc2MTU3NTU4?t=msk=Individual+health+planw1=Individualw2=Individual+counselingw3=Individual+health+planw4=Individual+income+taxw5=Individual+income+tax+returnc=5s=132g=2.sig=wXFwbY_BAxoq2bv9JMIluw - Individual income
[videoblogging] Re: twittering posts
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You know what I think is interesting about twitter? It's like the techie version of myspace friends. Now some of you are probably going What?!?!but think about it, part of the appeal from what I hear anyway, is the number of people following you, much like the number of friends people try and get over in myspace I'm sure there are probably quite a few people that are interested in who's following them. I'm sure that's a benefit for some people who attempt to create large lists of followers. :) My interest is in who I can follow, not who follows me. The first day I joined twitter, I started following someone in the acting/video biz. While I was still doing the ONE thing I was doing since I had started twitter up, according to what she posted, she had visited at least four different locations and done about six different tasks! :O It's interesting to become aware of what people are saying their day is like, as long as it pertains to a field or topic you're interested in. I might find out that Justin Kownacki's finishing his picture edit for the next STBD, and then, an hour later, I find out he's doing his sound edit. That wouldn't be interesting to a farmer, but the time it takes to go through processes in a field I'm interested in is consequently interesting to me. It's also interesting to hear about people traveling and being in different places from the last time they twittered... gives a little different spin to things as opposed to knowing that people were sitting exactly where they were before, because they were hard-wired to their ethernet connection in their basement somewhere. The downside to twitter is that if you're not being followed, people don't get YOUR communications. That makes it a situation of being there, but having no voice. For voyeurs, that's no problem at all. OTOH, that allows you to tailor whose twitters you receive, so it's really like crafting your own chat room. If someone says corny stuff all day, you just delete them and forget about it. Maybe it's good for people on the coast's or in cities where there is a bunch of activity, but in Cincinnati here, who wants to know that I am currently working on billing, or that today for lunch I got comic books?. I agree that it's more useful in places where there are more people and they do more things. I just had lunch with a friend because her plans changed mid-day and she twittered that she had a free window of time, and I had that same amount of time free. Even in Cincinnatti, I would think the local benefit wouldn't be hey... look what I'm doing, now!, but it would be the opportunity to make time to meet up with other people when your schedules coincide. Someone else might be thinking of going to the comic book store later tonight or tomorrow, but if they find out you're going earlier, they might make plans with you to meet up. Overall, it's not for everybody. -- Bill C. http://TheLab.blip.tv I don't know, I probably will get on because everyone else is doing it. But if history repeats, me getting on twitter will be the death kneel for it ;-) Heath I got scared shitless today, if you wanna know why check my blog http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote: Yes Twitter. Ryanne and I were looking at the hummingbirds outside the window here and she remembered your post. Those of you not on twitter you might want to consider it. To me it's kind of like a big 24/7 irc chat (but much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly-videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. - Verdi http://twitter.com/michaelverdi On 4/8/07, Markus Sandy markus.sandy@ wrote: hi all, i just wanted to share what i thought was an interesting occurrence. a few days ago, i started to getting some comments on one of my older apperceptions posts i figured that something was up that was making people to do that, but I did not know what not sure why, but i guessed that it was something ryanne had done turned out i was right. unknown to me at the time, she had twittered the post thanks ryanne! and thanks to all of you who have shared your thoughts and asked about buddy. i'm sad to say he has yet to return home. but i am also happy to see him in that video, to recall the magic of that hummingbird and for all the great comments from friends. i've never been twitter-dotted before. have others had this happen? markus -- http://SpinXpress.com/Markus_Sandy http://Ourmedia.org/Markus_Sandy -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com
[videoblogging] Grandpa Caleb Tribute
Thanks for all the warm thoughts and words. I finally got my video tribute online. Caleb would have been 95 today. :) http://www.lifestudent.com/hub/2007/04/09/1912-2007/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Need advice on how to conduct an interview for use on a blog.
i would also add the basic journalism stuff like dont ask a question to which the answer is yes or no i have done many interviews and prefer not to give my questions in advance since i like the answers to be fresh and not thought out in advance On 4/9/07, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, can anyone recommend any books or articles, etc, that give advice on how to conduct an interview with a guest. I am looking for tips on things to do, and not do during an interview with a guest, from the perspective of being the host. OK, thanks, Ed. Creative Cow Magazine covered this in...I think it was their February issue. The big thing to remember is that it's the guest who's the focus, not you, so just ask a question and let the guest riff. If you need to steer them back onto an intended topic, just ask a follow up question, but let the guest run. Also, prep is good. Lots of guests appreciate knowing the questions you'll be asking in advance, and this gives you both time to work out what angle the interview will be taking. Working out the questions in advance, and even writing them down, can be good because it gives you a chance to ensure you've got all your bases covered. Draw up an outline of points, if it helps you think of more questions. Also, too much is better than not enough. It's better to have an interview go long than it is to have missed a major point. Other than that, just remember you're there to let the guest talk, and it'll go fine. Unless it's a hostile interview, in which case, disregard that. :) -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] I would like to formally introduce myself.
My name is Heath Parks and I am a vlogger. Ok, I know most of you are going wtf Heath, we know you are a vlogger. But until now, at this very moment did I formally introduce myself, not as The Batman Geek but as just meHeath. A little background, when I started vlogging I wanted to create a hook to use a music term and since I liked Batman and I thought I would always be talking about Batman, the Batman Geek sounded like a good idea. So I did it. Anyway over a year later vlogging means something else to me now and I have been doing a lot of thinking, sofrom now on it's just HeathI will still have my batmangeek site because well, that's where ive been for over a year, but I do have some plans for plain old Heath Parks, hopefully you will like it. Anyway I just felt like saying that cya Heath http://batmangeek.com
Re: [videoblogging] I would like to formally introduce myself.
Welcome to identity, Heath. I can relate to 'Heath' but not to Batman. Dick Tracy was more my kinda cartoon hero. :) Jan On 4/9/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My name is Heath Parks and I am a vlogger. Ok, I know most of you are going wtf Heath, we know you are a vlogger. But until now, at this very moment did I formally introduce myself, not as The Batman Geek but as just meHeath. A little background, when I started vlogging I wanted to create a hook to use a music term and since I liked Batman and I thought I would always be talking about Batman, the Batman Geek sounded like a good idea. So I did it. Anyway over a year later vlogging means something else to me now and I have been doing a lot of thinking, sofrom now on it's just HeathI will still have my batmangeek site because well, that's where ive been for over a year, but I do have some plans for plain old Heath Parks, hopefully you will like it. Anyway I just felt like saying that cya Heath http://batmangeek.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] I would like to formally introduce myself.
great heath! looking forward On 4/9/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My name is Heath Parks and I am a vlogger. Ok, I know most of you are going wtf Heath, we know you are a vlogger. But until now, at this very moment did I formally introduce myself, not as The Batman Geek but as just meHeath. A little background, when I started vlogging I wanted to create a hook to use a music term and since I liked Batman and I thought I would always be talking about Batman, the Batman Geek sounded like a good idea. So I did it. Anyway over a year later vlogging means something else to me now and I have been doing a lot of thinking, sofrom now on it's just HeathI will still have my batmangeek site because well, that's where ive been for over a year, but I do have some plans for plain old Heath Parks, hopefully you will like it. Anyway I just felt like saying that cya Heath http://batmangeek.com -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: twittering posts
Well I just joined twitter and thank God for Bill from lofi, cause he was my first and probably only follower..I love ya Bill, even though you think you know how to cook! ;-) Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote: You know what I think is interesting about twitter? It's like the techie version of myspace friends. Now some of you are probably going What?!?!but think about it, part of the appeal from what I hear anyway, is the number of people following you, much like the number of friends people try and get over in myspace I'm sure there are probably quite a few people that are interested in who's following them. I'm sure that's a benefit for some people who attempt to create large lists of followers. :) My interest is in who I can follow, not who follows me. The first day I joined twitter, I started following someone in the acting/video biz. While I was still doing the ONE thing I was doing since I had started twitter up, according to what she posted, she had visited at least four different locations and done about six different tasks! :O It's interesting to become aware of what people are saying their day is like, as long as it pertains to a field or topic you're interested in. I might find out that Justin Kownacki's finishing his picture edit for the next STBD, and then, an hour later, I find out he's doing his sound edit. That wouldn't be interesting to a farmer, but the time it takes to go through processes in a field I'm interested in is consequently interesting to me. It's also interesting to hear about people traveling and being in different places from the last time they twittered... gives a little different spin to things as opposed to knowing that people were sitting exactly where they were before, because they were hard-wired to their ethernet connection in their basement somewhere. The downside to twitter is that if you're not being followed, people don't get YOUR communications. That makes it a situation of being there, but having no voice. For voyeurs, that's no problem at all. OTOH, that allows you to tailor whose twitters you receive, so it's really like crafting your own chat room. If someone says corny stuff all day, you just delete them and forget about it. Maybe it's good for people on the coast's or in cities where there is a bunch of activity, but in Cincinnati here, who wants to know that I am currently working on billing, or that today for lunch I got comic books?. I agree that it's more useful in places where there are more people and they do more things. I just had lunch with a friend because her plans changed mid-day and she twittered that she had a free window of time, and I had that same amount of time free. Even in Cincinnatti, I would think the local benefit wouldn't be hey... look what I'm doing, now!, but it would be the opportunity to make time to meet up with other people when your schedules coincide. Someone else might be thinking of going to the comic book store later tonight or tomorrow, but if they find out you're going earlier, they might make plans with you to meet up. Overall, it's not for everybody. -- Bill C. http://TheLab.blip.tv I don't know, I probably will get on because everyone else is doing it. But if history repeats, me getting on twitter will be the death kneel for it ;-) Heath I got scared shitless today, if you wanna know why check my blog http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote: Yes Twitter. Ryanne and I were looking at the hummingbirds outside the window here and she remembered your post. Those of you not on twitter you might want to consider it. To me it's kind of like a big 24/7 irc chat (but much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly- videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. - Verdi http://twitter.com/michaelverdi On 4/8/07, Markus Sandy markus.sandy@ wrote: hi all, i just wanted to share what i thought was an interesting occurrence. a few days ago, i started to getting some comments on one of my older apperceptions posts i figured that something was up that was making people to do that, but I did not know what not sure why, but i guessed that it was something ryanne had done turned out i was right. unknown to me at the time, she had twittered the post thanks ryanne! and thanks to all of you who have shared your thoughts and asked about buddy. i'm sad to say he
[videoblogging] Re: I would like to formally introduce myself.
Dick Tracy is cool, I like him as well, I like all things geek.. ;-) --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Welcome to identity, Heath. I can relate to 'Heath' but not to Batman. Dick Tracy was more my kinda cartoon hero. :) Jan On 4/9/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My name is Heath Parks and I am a vlogger. Ok, I know most of you are going wtf Heath, we know you are a vlogger. But until now, at this very moment did I formally introduce myself, not as The Batman Geek but as just meHeath. A little background, when I started vlogging I wanted to create a hook to use a music term and since I liked Batman and I thought I would always be talking about Batman, the Batman Geek sounded like a good idea. So I did it. Anyway over a year later vlogging means something else to me now and I have been doing a lot of thinking, sofrom now on it's just HeathI will still have my batmangeek site because well, that's where ive been for over a year, but I do have some plans for plain old Heath Parks, hopefully you will like it. Anyway I just felt like saying that cya Heath http://batmangeek.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [videoblogging] Need advice on how to conduct an interview for use on a blog.
there was a rocking session on this at Boston Podcamp - I lived blogged it - really good advice http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2006/09/interview_techn.html The speakers were excellent and they also gave me lots of follow advice via email. B _ From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 5:20 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Need advice on how to conduct an interview for use on a blog. Hi, can anyone recommend any books or articles, etc, that give advice on how to conduct an interview with a guest. I am looking for tips on things to do, and not do during an interview with a guest, from the perspective of being the host. OK, thanks, Ed. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Need advice on how to conduct an interview for use on a blog.
I agree, I usually have a few set questions that I know can't be answered by a yes or no because that can kill an interview. I would also add, listen to you guest, be willing to create questions off what the guest says, sometimes you get some great stuff by just listening to what a guest or interviewee says... Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i would also add the basic journalism stuff like dont ask a question to which the answer is yes or no i have done many interviews and prefer not to give my questions in advance since i like the answers to be fresh and not thought out in advance On 4/9/07, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, can anyone recommend any books or articles, etc, that give advice on how to conduct an interview with a guest. I am looking for tips on things to do, and not do during an interview with a guest, from the perspective of being the host. OK, thanks, Ed. Creative Cow Magazine covered this in...I think it was their February issue. The big thing to remember is that it's the guest who's the focus, not you, so just ask a question and let the guest riff. If you need to steer them back onto an intended topic, just ask a follow up question, but let the guest run. Also, prep is good. Lots of guests appreciate knowing the questions you'll be asking in advance, and this gives you both time to work out what angle the interview will be taking. Working out the questions in advance, and even writing them down, can be good because it gives you a chance to ensure you've got all your bases covered. Draw up an outline of points, if it helps you think of more questions. Also, too much is better than not enough. It's better to have an interview go long than it is to have missed a major point. Other than that, just remember you're there to let the guest talk, and it'll go fine. Unless it's a hostile interview, in which case, disregard that. :) -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: twittering posts
Like Jen said - it's certainly brought me closer to folks I already knew a bit, opened lines of communication, made spontaneous digital meetings possible...answers to questions arrive...support (even an 'XO' means a lot when you're beating your head against the keyboard trying to figure out why it isn't working... I like feeling the digtial pulse of a community of colleagues I respect and admire, even as they paint their new apartment or have a sandwich. That reminds me, time to eat. Jan On 4/9/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You know what I think is interesting about twitter? It's like the techie version of myspace friends. Now some of you are probably going What?!?!but think about it, part of the appeal from what I hear anyway, is the number of people following you, much like the number of friends people try and get over in myspace I'm sure there are probably quite a few people that are interested in who's following them. I'm sure that's a benefit for some people who attempt to create large lists of followers. :) My interest is in who I can follow, not who follows me. The first day I joined twitter, I started following someone in the acting/video biz. While I was still doing the ONE thing I was doing since I had started twitter up, according to what she posted, she had visited at least four different locations and done about six different tasks! :O It's interesting to become aware of what people are saying their day is like, as long as it pertains to a field or topic you're interested in. I might find out that Justin Kownacki's finishing his picture edit for the next STBD, and then, an hour later, I find out he's doing his sound edit. That wouldn't be interesting to a farmer, but the time it takes to go through processes in a field I'm interested in is consequently interesting to me. It's also interesting to hear about people traveling and being in different places from the last time they twittered... gives a little different spin to things as opposed to knowing that people were sitting exactly where they were before, because they were hard-wired to their ethernet connection in their basement somewhere. The downside to twitter is that if you're not being followed, people don't get YOUR communications. That makes it a situation of being there, but having no voice. For voyeurs, that's no problem at all. OTOH, that allows you to tailor whose twitters you receive, so it's really like crafting your own chat room. If someone says corny stuff all day, you just delete them and forget about it. Maybe it's good for people on the coast's or in cities where there is a bunch of activity, but in Cincinnati here, who wants to know that I am currently working on billing, or that today for lunch I got comic books?. I agree that it's more useful in places where there are more people and they do more things. I just had lunch with a friend because her plans changed mid-day and she twittered that she had a free window of time, and I had that same amount of time free. Even in Cincinnatti, I would think the local benefit wouldn't be hey... look what I'm doing, now!, but it would be the opportunity to make time to meet up with other people when your schedules coincide. Someone else might be thinking of going to the comic book store later tonight or tomorrow, but if they find out you're going earlier, they might make plans with you to meet up. Overall, it's not for everybody. -- Bill C. http://TheLab.blip.tv I don't know, I probably will get on because everyone else is doing it. But if history repeats, me getting on twitter will be the death kneel for it ;-) Heath I got scared shitless today, if you wanna know why check my blog http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote: Yes Twitter. Ryanne and I were looking at the hummingbirds outside the window here and she remembered your post. Those of you not on twitter you might want to consider it. To me it's kind of like a big 24/7 irc chat (but much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly-videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. - Verdi http://twitter.com/michaelverdi On 4/8/07, Markus Sandy markus.sandy@ wrote: hi all, i just wanted to share what i thought was an interesting occurrence. a few days ago, i started to getting some comments on one of my older apperceptions posts i figured that something was up that was making people to do that, but I did not know what not sure why, but i guessed that it was something ryanne had done turned out i was right.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: twittering posts
What's your Twitter name, Heath? I'm 'fauxpress' @ http://twitter.com/fauxpress Jan On 4/9/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I just joined twitter and thank God for Bill from lofi, cause he was my first and probably only follower..I love ya Bill, even though you think you know how to cook! ;-) Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote: You know what I think is interesting about twitter? It's like the techie version of myspace friends. Now some of you are probably going What?!?!but think about it, part of the appeal from what I hear anyway, is the number of people following you, much like the number of friends people try and get over in myspace I'm sure there are probably quite a few people that are interested in who's following them. I'm sure that's a benefit for some people who attempt to create large lists of followers. :) My interest is in who I can follow, not who follows me. The first day I joined twitter, I started following someone in the acting/video biz. While I was still doing the ONE thing I was doing since I had started twitter up, according to what she posted, she had visited at least four different locations and done about six different tasks! :O It's interesting to become aware of what people are saying their day is like, as long as it pertains to a field or topic you're interested in. I might find out that Justin Kownacki's finishing his picture edit for the next STBD, and then, an hour later, I find out he's doing his sound edit. That wouldn't be interesting to a farmer, but the time it takes to go through processes in a field I'm interested in is consequently interesting to me. It's also interesting to hear about people traveling and being in different places from the last time they twittered... gives a little different spin to things as opposed to knowing that people were sitting exactly where they were before, because they were hard-wired to their ethernet connection in their basement somewhere. The downside to twitter is that if you're not being followed, people don't get YOUR communications. That makes it a situation of being there, but having no voice. For voyeurs, that's no problem at all. OTOH, that allows you to tailor whose twitters you receive, so it's really like crafting your own chat room. If someone says corny stuff all day, you just delete them and forget about it. Maybe it's good for people on the coast's or in cities where there is a bunch of activity, but in Cincinnati here, who wants to know that I am currently working on billing, or that today for lunch I got comic books?. I agree that it's more useful in places where there are more people and they do more things. I just had lunch with a friend because her plans changed mid-day and she twittered that she had a free window of time, and I had that same amount of time free. Even in Cincinnatti, I would think the local benefit wouldn't be hey... look what I'm doing, now!, but it would be the opportunity to make time to meet up with other people when your schedules coincide. Someone else might be thinking of going to the comic book store later tonight or tomorrow, but if they find out you're going earlier, they might make plans with you to meet up. Overall, it's not for everybody. -- Bill C. http://TheLab.blip.tv I don't know, I probably will get on because everyone else is doing it. But if history repeats, me getting on twitter will be the death kneel for it ;-) Heath I got scared shitless today, if you wanna know why check my blog http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote: Yes Twitter. Ryanne and I were looking at the hummingbirds outside the window here and she remembered your post. Those of you not on twitter you might want to consider it. To me it's kind of like a big 24/7 irc chat (but much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly- videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. - Verdi http://twitter.com/michaelverdi On 4/8/07, Markus Sandy markus.sandy@ wrote: hi all, i just wanted to share what i thought was an interesting occurrence. a few days ago, i started to getting some comments on one of my older apperceptions posts i figured that something was up that was making people to do that, but I did not know what not sure why, but i guessed that it was something ryanne had done turned out i was right.
[videoblogging] Re: question about using vpip in a wordpress blog
Thanks Josh, I did a little more checking - and heard from Enric. He pointed me to the installation stuff on his site. BUT then I went to wordpress.com and discovered that for the FREE wordpress blogs - that is for the the blogs that have an address such as realrez.wordpress.com - you can't actually add plug-ins which is what the vpip is. Now if I were to install the worpress blog on my own website - then no worries. And maybe if I do the wordpress upgrade, I might be able to use the plug-in - but I haven't checked on that. So for now, I changed the post at Http://realrez.wordpress.com - so that it goes to my regular site- http://realrez.com and you can watch the video there. I'm still working out the blip.tv thing, and hope to have a blip version up tonight. We'll see... it's all good. Milt
[videoblogging] Re: twittering posts
It's hpbatman7 because that's what I am across most IM's etc and in case you are wondering, hp is for Heath Parks, batman7 is because well, like I said I do like batman... ;-) Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's your Twitter name, Heath? I'm 'fauxpress' @ http://twitter.com/fauxpress Jan On 4/9/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I just joined twitter and thank God for Bill from lofi, cause he was my first and probably only follower..I love ya Bill, even though you think you know how to cook! ;-) Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack BillCammack@ wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote: You know what I think is interesting about twitter? It's like the techie version of myspace friends. Now some of you are probably going What?!?!but think about it, part of the appeal from what I hear anyway, is the number of people following you, much like the number of friends people try and get over in myspace I'm sure there are probably quite a few people that are interested in who's following them. I'm sure that's a benefit for some people who attempt to create large lists of followers. :) My interest is in who I can follow, not who follows me. The first day I joined twitter, I started following someone in the acting/video biz. While I was still doing the ONE thing I was doing since I had started twitter up, according to what she posted, she had visited at least four different locations and done about six different tasks! :O It's interesting to become aware of what people are saying their day is like, as long as it pertains to a field or topic you're interested in. I might find out that Justin Kownacki's finishing his picture edit for the next STBD, and then, an hour later, I find out he's doing his sound edit. That wouldn't be interesting to a farmer, but the time it takes to go through processes in a field I'm interested in is consequently interesting to me. It's also interesting to hear about people traveling and being in different places from the last time they twittered... gives a little different spin to things as opposed to knowing that people were sitting exactly where they were before, because they were hard-wired to their ethernet connection in their basement somewhere. The downside to twitter is that if you're not being followed, people don't get YOUR communications. That makes it a situation of being there, but having no voice. For voyeurs, that's no problem at all. OTOH, that allows you to tailor whose twitters you receive, so it's really like crafting your own chat room. If someone says corny stuff all day, you just delete them and forget about it. Maybe it's good for people on the coast's or in cities where there is a bunch of activity, but in Cincinnati here, who wants to know that I am currently working on billing, or that today for lunch I got comic books?. I agree that it's more useful in places where there are more people and they do more things. I just had lunch with a friend because her plans changed mid-day and she twittered that she had a free window of time, and I had that same amount of time free. Even in Cincinnatti, I would think the local benefit wouldn't be hey... look what I'm doing, now!, but it would be the opportunity to make time to meet up with other people when your schedules coincide. Someone else might be thinking of going to the comic book store later tonight or tomorrow, but if they find out you're going earlier, they might make plans with you to meet up. Overall, it's not for everybody. -- Bill C. http://TheLab.blip.tv I don't know, I probably will get on because everyone else is doing it. But if history repeats, me getting on twitter will be the death kneel for it ;-) Heath I got scared shitless today, if you wanna know why check my blog http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote: Yes Twitter. Ryanne and I were looking at the hummingbirds outside the window here and she remembered your post. Those of you not on twitter you might want to consider it. To me it's kind of like a big 24/7 irc chat (but much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly- videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. - Verdi http://twitter.com/michaelverdi On 4/8/07, Markus
[videoblogging] Re: twittering posts
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like Jen said - it's certainly brought me closer to folks I already knew a bit, opened lines of communication, made spontaneous digital meetings possible...answers to questions arrive...support (even an 'XO' means a lot when you're beating your head against the keyboard trying to figure out why it isn't working... I like feeling the digtial pulse of a community of colleagues I respect and admire, even as they paint their new apartment or have a sandwich. That reminds me, time to eat. Jan Yes, that's a really good way to put it. It's like having other people in the next cubicle over instead of somewhere across the country or wherever... I mean... not like I ever worked in a cubicle, but you get the idea! ;) On 4/9/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote: You know what I think is interesting about twitter? It's like the techie version of myspace friends. Now some of you are probably going What?!?!but think about it, part of the appeal from what I hear anyway, is the number of people following you, much like the number of friends people try and get over in myspace I'm sure there are probably quite a few people that are interested in who's following them. I'm sure that's a benefit for some people who attempt to create large lists of followers. :) My interest is in who I can follow, not who follows me. The first day I joined twitter, I started following someone in the acting/video biz. While I was still doing the ONE thing I was doing since I had started twitter up, according to what she posted, she had visited at least four different locations and done about six different tasks! :O It's interesting to become aware of what people are saying their day is like, as long as it pertains to a field or topic you're interested in. I might find out that Justin Kownacki's finishing his picture edit for the next STBD, and then, an hour later, I find out he's doing his sound edit. That wouldn't be interesting to a farmer, but the time it takes to go through processes in a field I'm interested in is consequently interesting to me. It's also interesting to hear about people traveling and being in different places from the last time they twittered... gives a little different spin to things as opposed to knowing that people were sitting exactly where they were before, because they were hard-wired to their ethernet connection in their basement somewhere. The downside to twitter is that if you're not being followed, people don't get YOUR communications. That makes it a situation of being there, but having no voice. For voyeurs, that's no problem at all. OTOH, that allows you to tailor whose twitters you receive, so it's really like crafting your own chat room. If someone says corny stuff all day, you just delete them and forget about it. Maybe it's good for people on the coast's or in cities where there is a bunch of activity, but in Cincinnati here, who wants to know that I am currently working on billing, or that today for lunch I got comic books?. I agree that it's more useful in places where there are more people and they do more things. I just had lunch with a friend because her plans changed mid-day and she twittered that she had a free window of time, and I had that same amount of time free. Even in Cincinnatti, I would think the local benefit wouldn't be hey... look what I'm doing, now!, but it would be the opportunity to make time to meet up with other people when your schedules coincide. Someone else might be thinking of going to the comic book store later tonight or tomorrow, but if they find out you're going earlier, they might make plans with you to meet up. Overall, it's not for everybody. -- Bill C. http://TheLab.blip.tv I don't know, I probably will get on because everyone else is doing it. But if history repeats, me getting on twitter will be the death kneel for it ;-) Heath I got scared shitless today, if you wanna know why check my blog http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote: Yes Twitter. Ryanne and I were looking at the hummingbirds outside the window here and she remembered your post. Those of you not on twitter you might want to consider it. To me it's kind of like a big 24/7 irc chat (but much easier to use + works on your phone). I looked at the Yahoo group stats and it seems like the number of messages over the last week are down about 50%. My guess is that much of the social/not-strictly-videoblogging messages have moved over to Twitter. - Verdi http://twitter.com/michaelverdi On 4/8/07, Markus Sandy markus.sandy@ wrote: hi
[videoblogging] steve garfield's kitchen
damn that's cool! steve garfield just IM'd and said check out his kitchen he was using his cell phone to broadcast here's a quick screencast i grabbed http://apperceptions.org/2007/04/10/live-from-steve-garfields-kitchen/ steve, you are too much fun. do you always do things like this to your dinner guests? :) markus -- http://SpinXpress.com/Markus_Sandy http://Ourmedia.org/Markus_Sandy
Re: [videoblogging] Re: question about using vpip in a wordpress blog
You don't need to install a plug-in in order to be able to embed video into your wordpress blog! There are many ways to do it, and while vPIP is a good one, there are others that will work with wordpress.com 1) use the freevlog video embedding tool to write code for you. http://www.freevlog.org/popup/ There's a tutorial (of course) on how to use it (and why) at: http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2006/04/18/freevlog-video-pop-up- maker/ 2) host your videos at blip.tv, and use their tools to create the code... Jen On Apr 9, 2007, at 7:36 pm, Milt Lee wrote: So for now, I changed the post at Http://realrez.wordpress.com - so that it goes to my regular site- http://realrez.com and you can watch the video there. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Need advice on how to conduct an interview for use on a blog.
Is this going to be a sit down style interview like a talk show format or a taped interview like news style? Either way you should think of your interview as a conversation, and keep a natural flow. Write down 3-5 questions to use as back up or for reference, but don't be tied to them. Listen to your interviewee's responses and ask follow ups. Don't say uhh huh verbally, just nod your head in agreemnt. Be relaxed, and have fun. Ask direct questions, don't babble or ramble. Remember you're in control of the interview. If it's a talk show format introducew your guest, shake their hand and get to askin If it's news style where you're just looking for soundbites aks them for their first last name and title, and get to askin. Any other questions just holla. Peace! AC http://myurbanreport.blip.tv http://www.myurbanreport.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, can anyone recommend any books or articles, etc, that give advice on how to conduct an interview with a guest. I am looking for tips on things to do, and not do during an interview with a guest, from the perspective of being the host. OK, thanks, Ed.
[videoblogging] MobileBlogging- And internet Tv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF5zNJLJ7aY Apple tv (concept)used for mobileblogging training. . Gotta Love it! http://www.oneinthehand.blogspot.com The only Treo Training Video Cast in the World [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: steve garfield's kitchen
Steve: In one of your earlier broadcasts from the kitchen, I think you mentioned you were using the N93 and a wireless connection. Were you on wireless for all of the several broadcasts of the evening, or did you switch to data transfer? John
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone
Hi everyone: On 4/8/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Besides, I don't think Josh has EVER referred to himself as an anarchist. Have you Josh? http://web.archive.org/web/2005123539/http://joshwolf.net/ I live in San Francisco. I'm an artist, an activist, an anarchist and an archivist; this is my videoblog. I most humbly stand corrected. :D Cheers :D -- Pat Cook Denver, Colorado WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/ PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/ Pat's Health Medical Wonders VideoCast - http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/ MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/ YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/ THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone
Hi everyone: On 4/9/07, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not even going to say wether Josh was right or wrong... but I both respect him and am tremendously grateful to him that he's driving the discussion and pressing the point. He pressed it enough to get the attention of PBS. The bottom line is this... there has been plenty of understanding of due process when it comes to physical property. Our right to be secure in our physical property... say a diary... our mail. Not to mention mainstream journalists and their sources when major stories that lead to controversy and scandals are broke. But as we move into intellectual property it gets stickier and stickier. Phone tapping was one thing... but now that our means of communication also become self archiving like email, video, photos, and audio... we have very important NEW considerations because now the governent can sopoena not just records of meta information like who you called... but increasingly records of what was said... in email, audio recordings, video footage, photos. Apparently the government has yet to acquaint itself with the Internet Archive. The funny thing is more of this information is public on our blogs, video and photosharing sites, twiter... and all over. This alone gives the institutions of law enforcement and intelligence tremendous new powers and tools... I'm not so convinced... well... I'm downright opposed to the idea that they also need new liberties and are cutting through the red tape of due process to get at our personal data. They don't neccessarily need new liberties. In many cases, they just simply flex the muscles of the OLD ones instead. It's an extremely slippery slope. It is indeed :( Cheers :D -- Pat Cook Denver, Colorado WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/ PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/ Pat's Health Medical Wonders VideoCast - http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/ MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/ YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/ THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow
[videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf in the Hot Zone
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: On 4/8/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook patsvideoblog@ wrote: Besides, I don't think Josh has EVER referred to himself as an anarchist. Have you Josh? http://web.archive.org/web/2005123539/http://joshwolf.net/ I live in San Francisco. I'm an artist, an activist, an anarchist and an archivist; this is my videoblog. I most humbly stand corrected. :D It is somewhat hidden in the Internet Archive Wayback Machine ;) Cheers :D -- Pat Cook Denver, Colorado WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/ PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/ Pat's Health Medical Wonders VideoCast - http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/ MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/ YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/ THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow
[videoblogging] DC Media Makers Meeting, April 12
Come share your projects, get, and give, feedback. Plus, veteran media maker, Jim Long will give his report from the the Video on the Net conference, as well as give a quick presentation on creating sequences. Yeah! When: Thursday, April 12, 2007 6:30 PM - 8:45 PM Where: Southeast Branch Public Library 403 7th St SE Washington, D.C., District of Columbia 20003 Metro: Eastern Market stop, Blue and Orange lines.
Re: [videoblogging] what happens when cops are wrong
Hello, The law is a means to an end. Not a holy document. If it's not illegal now... that can be fixed and made illegal very easily. Saying things like they are backwards or corrupt implies that they are NOT doing what they are suppose to be doing. Even in this case, the police are doing what their suppose to do. (The question that that statement begs is... WHO determines what they are suppose to be doing.) See ya On 4/9/07, JOHNNIE WARNER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ..something I felt like sharing - kinda made me wanna say h. Its been plenty of times that have been shared over the web when people are mistreated or mishandled by the cops or other forms of authority. This youtube clip in particular just shows how backwards and corrupt some of OUR law enforcement agencies are and where their real priorities are. Although this may be comical in it s deliverance of the prank - i don't think it deserved the end result. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7snbtwG5wcmode=relatedsearch= http://www.oneinthehand.blogspot.com The only Treo Training Video Cast in the World -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
