[videoblogging] the unstoppable net
Interesting artcle http://www.brw.com.au/viewer.aspx?EDP://2007071919146498magsection=Technologyportal=_ARTICLEtitle=The+unstoppable+net Keypoints - Half online advertising is banking and finance Australian internet 1800 kbits average, USA 8400 kbits average The formation of advertising companies specialising in online ads eg postclick cheers overlander
[videoblogging] Re: Publicity or lack of, old and new
The course of the future manifestation of a technology is hard to know. Ideas popular at the time that people subscribe to and set as standards such as transparency, end of privacy, elimination of copyright, etc. may turn out prophetic, overblown or some combination of both. Evolution sorts out what works and doesn't -- the success is usually there at the time, but usually not noticed. But obvious later. Keeping eyes open and not entrenched in a set of ideas I think is a good approach. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lots of different discussions recently have got me thinking about publicity. It strikes me that its become one of the weaker links, it hasnt evolved like the ease of use, technology distribution stuff has. I dunno, perhaps I would expect the various network/distribution/guide companies to do more to try to promote themselves beyond the web2.0/silly con valley/early adopter crowd, perhaps they do try but its not easy. I jusst think that if I actually had a show, I would be looking for a partner that could deliver some real value by actually being able to do a decent job of promoting the show. Now this does tie in to distribution, ie if you get on various settop or mobile networks featured in their on screen guide, some more people will find you. But even on that front Ive not often seen the vlog-related new networks make that many tie-ups with these networks. Heck its really unclear what the reality is out there because there are plenty of positive stories with huge $ numbers attached to these things, but hard to see where its actually happening in reality. Oh I dunno, it just strikes me that companies that expect to make money through advertising, need to find ways to advertise themselves better to the masses. Im conflicted on these points, as I hate many forms of advertising, and the net is supposed to have all sorts of new ways that people will find your content if they are interested, and various new forms of pblicity, concepts such as something going viral (as opposed to fake viral marketing). Ive long believed that the 'death of the music industry' predictors were ignoring the fact that just because the rules of distribution can change against established giants advantage, this does not automatically kill their ability to advertise their stuff, and get the mass customers needed to make the thing profitable. Im also aware that some could say these things are a quality issue, if there were more shows out there that were 'must watch' to the majority of people, news of them would spread like wildfire, the people would find them for themselves. It may be true, I dunno, its a brave new world and Im not sure if we are there yet. In any case it seems that so far there are a few different types of companies out there that have emerged and could be interesting partners for vloggers. Whether they succeed or fail could depend just as much on keeping the right things from the old ways of doing business, as which elements of web 2 they adopt. Maybe some companies have assumed the web will do their publicity for them, and been mistaken, or at least not realised quite what a narrow section of humans their marketing efforts have reached. But does this mean Im calling for some of the qualities of an old style TV network to be brought to vlog show business, when I previous reacted with horror and venom to such concepts? I dont know, I suppose at least in so much as I always found Channel Frederator rather watchable and yet it feels like a TV channel in some ways. Cheers Steve Elbows
[videoblogging] audio posting
I only recently realized there aren´t (are there?) free hosting services for audio, like Blip provides for video. Why is that? Any ideas on how to post audio on a blog for free, with a nice player and easy permalinks? Miguel.
RE: [videoblogging] audio posting
At blip we do support audio. Simply upload an mp3 file, and we play it in a flash player. Thanks, Charles --- original message --- From: miglsd27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [videoblogging] audio posting Date: July 31, 2007 Time: 8:31:56 I only recently realized there aren´t (are there?) free hosting services for audio, like Blip provides for video. Why is that? Any ideas on how to post audio on a blog for free, with a nice player and easy permalinks? Miguel. Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Re: Blank tape detected in Premiere
I've started using Premiere Pro CS3 with my HDR-HC1 and I have no such problems capturing (and I usually capture close to 60 minutes straight)? My scene detect box is greyed out, though, which is weird... I'm hoping to avoid capturing altogether soon by using On Location, but I just haven't had time to begin learning/using it. Has anyone started using On Location? It looks like a huge time saver. Chuck --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, When I dump a tape to Premiere, it sometimes stops in the middle of the capture process and says capture stopped because blank tape was detected. I've become used to this as a minor glitch that occurs once in a blue moon. Lately, though, it's been happening a lot. It seems to crop up once every two minutes of footage. The footage itself is there, and if I back up to the beginning of the scene and capture again, everything's fine. This is becoming an annoyance, though, and I'm afraid it might be a sign of impending equipment failure, which is something I can't afford. The camera itself is only about a year old, and it hasn't seen heavy, regular use until about last March when Greentime began. Does anyone have any experience with this error? Is there something I need to do to help fix this? I tried my head cleaner on my camera, but to no avail. -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime
[videoblogging] Re: audio posting
Hell yeah, very good. Not as good as your video options and general experience but its still very very nice. I had tried uploading a aif file, dumb me ;). Thanks Blip, Miguel. At blip we do support audio. Simply upload an mp3 file, and we play it in a flash player. Thanks, Charles --- original message --- From: miglsd27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [videoblogging] audio posting Date: July 31, 2007 Time: 8:31:56 I only recently realized there aren´t (are there?) free hosting services for audio, like Blip provides for video. Why is that? Any ideas on how to post audio on a blog for free, with a nice player and easy permalinks? Miguel. Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
just read this on Shelly Palmer's Media 3.0 site. you can sign up for a daily email from him. i find it very useful and concise. thx, eric. VIDMETRIX has launched its own multi-site video uploader. The tool will allow video publishers to automatically distribute their content to seven video-sharing sites: YouTube, MySpace, Metacafe, Google, Yahoo, Revver, and Veoh. Tubemogul, which announced a multi-site uploader last week, is adding 3 new distribution sites to its service today, bringing its total reach to 9 video-sharing sites. MY DAMN CHANNEL is a new online video destination launching this morning. The site will emphasize professional, episodic content, and promises to disrupt media by giving content creators artistic freedom. The early roster of professionals includes comedian Harry Shearer, producer Don Was, actor Paul Reiser, and Web phenom Andy Milonakis. MDC will syndicate its content across video-sharing sites, and collect advertising revenue. The site has signed a distribution deal with YouTube. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
Hi, do you have a link to MY Damn Channel? Thanks, Edward SmithOffer 2 Free life-coaching sessions with an experienced, reputable life coach to purchasers of your book or product, at no cost to you. A proven way to increase your product sales and offer a $250 value to your customers, with no catches. Contact Theresa Smith at 201-568-0019, email, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://brightmoment.com/coaching.htm [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
What makes these sites a preferable choice to other places offering similar features? Places like Veoh have offered these kinds of syndication, and Blip.tv also has similar features. Why would I want to use these sites over others? -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime just read this on Shelly Palmer's Media 3.0 site. you can sign up for a daily email from him. i find it very useful and concise. thx, eric. VIDMETRIX has launched its own multi-site video uploader. The tool will allow video publishers to automatically distribute their content to seven video-sharing sites: YouTube, MySpace, Metacafe, Google, Yahoo, Revver, and Veoh. Tubemogul, which announced a multi-site uploader last week, is adding 3 new distribution sites to its service today, bringing its total reach to 9 video-sharing sites. MY DAMN CHANNEL is a new online video destination launching this morning. The site will emphasize professional, episodic content, and promises to disrupt media by giving content creators artistic freedom. The early roster of professionals includes comedian Harry Shearer, producer Don Was, actor Paul Reiser, and Web phenom Andy Milonakis. MDC will syndicate its content across video-sharing sites, and collect advertising revenue. The site has signed a distribution deal with YouTube. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Re: new ways to distribute your shows
http://www.mydamnchannel.com/ There isnt a huge amount of content yet, mostly warm-up trailers, but I found it quite watchable so far as its fairly tongue-in-cheek. eg: http://www.mydamnchannel.com/hotmentalfreedom.aspx (start your way to a bright non-compensated career in content generation lol) http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=76 http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=100 Cheers Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ed Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, do you have a link to MY Damn Channel? Thanks, Edward SmithOffer 2 Free life-coaching sessions with an experienced, reputable life coach to purchasers of your book or product, at no cost to you. A proven way to increase your product sales and offer a $250 value to your customers, with no catches. Contact Theresa Smith at 201-568-0019, email, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://brightmoment.com/coaching.htm [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: new ways to distribute your shows
On top of that... Unless there's multi-site REPLACE and DELETE, you're going to have to run all over creation to change a video if you find out you made a mistake in the one you originally uploaded. Plus, enjoy getting out your abacus and tallying your stats from multiple sites! hahaha :D -- billcammack --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What makes these sites a preferable choice to other places offering similar features? Places like Veoh have offered these kinds of syndication, and Blip.tv also has similar features. Why would I want to use these sites over others? -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime just read this on Shelly Palmer's Media 3.0 site. you can sign up for a daily email from him. i find it very useful and concise. thx, eric. VIDMETRIX has launched its own multi-site video uploader. The tool will allow video publishers to automatically distribute their content to seven video-sharing sites: YouTube, MySpace, Metacafe, Google, Yahoo, Revver, and Veoh. Tubemogul, which announced a multi-site uploader last week, is adding 3 new distribution sites to its service today, bringing its total reach to 9 video-sharing sites. MY DAMN CHANNEL is a new online video destination launching this morning. The site will emphasize professional, episodic content, and promises to disrupt media by giving content creators artistic freedom. The early roster of professionals includes comedian Harry Shearer, producer Don Was, actor Paul Reiser, and Web phenom Andy Milonakis. MDC will syndicate its content across video-sharing sites, and collect advertising revenue. The site has signed a distribution deal with YouTube. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Re: new ways to distribute your shows
Actually I think thats Vidmetrix's main feature, they are one of these sites that aggregates stats from various different sites to try to give you amalgamated stats for your vids. Cheers Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Plus, enjoy getting out your abacus and tallying your stats from multiple sites! hahaha :D -- billcammack
Re: [videoblogging] Re: new ways to distribute your shows
I loved the out of sync audio at the end...! On Jul 31, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Steve Watkins wrote: http://www.mydamnchannel.com/hotmentalfreedom.aspx (start your way to a bright non-compensated career in content generation lol) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
I'm really excited by the multi-site uploaders. I've been waiting for someone to do this properly. It's important for a lot of reasons. Most of all because most people haven't got time to spend their lives uploading every video to a dozen different sites, entering Titles, Descriptions, tags, etc on each one. So you end up missing out on all the people who frequent sites you haven't uploaded to. I'd far rather spend that time finding other people's videos, watching them and connecting. To reply to J Rhett Aultman: Obviously, it's just the ease of use and range of sites they offer that will make them attractive or not. As far as I'm concerned, progress is all about automation of all the things that have traditionally taken a very long time in making and publishing a videoblog. Blip has great crossposting options, but doesn't let you upload to competitors like youtube - except your myspace blog (not to Myspace Video). Veoh has a more limited range of sites you can cross-post to than those listed by Eric today - and they slap a logo on the front of your video. Plus they screwed up all my audio - put it out of sync, but Halcyon said a couple of weeks ago that it works well for him. Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/ On 31 Jul 2007, at 17:19, J. Rhett Aultman wrote: What makes these sites a preferable choice to other places offering similar features? Places like Veoh have offered these kinds of syndication, and Blip.tv also has similar features. Why would I want to use these sites over others? -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime just read this on Shelly Palmer's Media 3.0 site. you can sign up for a daily email from him. i find it very useful and concise. thx, eric. VIDMETRIX has launched its own multi-site video uploader. The tool will allow video publishers to automatically distribute their content to seven video-sharing sites: YouTube, MySpace, Metacafe, Google, Yahoo, Revver, and Veoh. Tubemogul, which announced a multi-site uploader last week, is adding 3 new distribution sites to its service today, bringing its total reach to 9 video-sharing sites. MY DAMN CHANNEL is a new online video destination launching this morning. The site will emphasize professional, episodic content, and promises to disrupt media by giving content creators artistic freedom. The early roster of professionals includes comedian Harry Shearer, producer Don Was, actor Paul Reiser, and Web phenom Andy Milonakis. MDC will syndicate its content across video-sharing sites, and collect advertising revenue. The site has signed a distribution deal with YouTube. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
I mean, not that we'd even have to create a new group: http://youtube.com/group/videoblogging is there already. Unless you think there's a need to start another I'm going to join up there. On 31 Jul 2007, at 19:56, Rupert wrote: So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
I'm up for it. Some of my videos have been racking up 10s of views over the last few weeks and I haven't met anyone yet. Mostly I guess it's a matter of spending time figuring out how things work. I couldn't figure out the group thing either. I did submit a video to an editing group and it got seen a few times. - Verdi On 7/31/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean, not that we'd even have to create a new group: http://youtube.com/group/videoblogging is there already. Unless you think there's a need to start another I'm going to join up there. On 31 Jul 2007, at 19:56, Rupert wrote: So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
I joined that group - http://youtube.com/group/videoblogging and posted a message. Hopefully more than just the hot and sweaty workout girl will answer. - Verdi On 7/31/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm up for it. Some of my videos have been racking up 10s of views over the last few weeks and I haven't met anyone yet. Mostly I guess it's a matter of spending time figuring out how things work. I couldn't figure out the group thing either. I did submit a video to an editing group and it got seen a few times. - Verdi On 7/31/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean, not that we'd even have to create a new group: http://youtube.com/group/videoblogging is there already. Unless you think there's a need to start another I'm going to join up there. On 31 Jul 2007, at 19:56, Rupert wrote: So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
These multi-site uploaders remind me of the multi-site submit companies (submit your site to over 10,000 search engines!). Never really worked for me... For syndication of video, Media RSS is the solution. Manage once, publish everywhere. It provides ONE place to manage videos, metadata, and all metrics can be consolidated into one place. It provides better control (at least as good as you are going to get nowadays) - if you want a video removed, just remove it from your RSS file. Media RSS is also a great solution to allow people to watch your video in any player they want. Unfortunately, most of these video companies require you to upload your video (and agree to their TOS), so we are still stuck with the upload your video and agree to my TOS problem until these sites become more open networks and accept video feeds. Just my 2 cents. :) -Frank Frank Sinton CEO [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mefeedia.com/user/franks/ http://mefeedia.com - Discover, Collect, and Share video blogs -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rupert Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:41 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows I'm really excited by the multi-site uploaders. I've been waiting for someone to do this properly. It's important for a lot of reasons. Most of all because most people haven't got time to spend their lives uploading every video to a dozen different sites, entering Titles, Descriptions, tags, etc on each one. So you end up missing out on all the people who frequent sites you haven't uploaded to. I'd far rather spend that time finding other people's videos, watching them and connecting. To reply to J Rhett Aultman: Obviously, it's just the ease of use and range of sites they offer that will make them attractive or not. As far as I'm concerned, progress is all about automation of all the things that have traditionally taken a very long time in making and publishing a videoblog. Blip has great crossposting options, but doesn't let you upload to competitors like youtube - except your myspace blog (not to Myspace Video). Veoh has a more limited range of sites you can cross-post to than those listed by Eric today - and they slap a logo on the front of your video. Plus they screwed up all my audio - put it out of sync, but Halcyon said a couple of weeks ago that it works well for him. Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/ On 31 Jul 2007, at 17:19, J. Rhett Aultman wrote: What makes these sites a preferable choice to other places offering similar features? Places like Veoh have offered these kinds of syndication, and Blip.tv also has similar features. Why would I want to use these sites over others? -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime just read this on Shelly Palmer's Media 3.0 site. you can sign up for a daily email from him. i find it very useful and concise. thx, eric. VIDMETRIX has launched its own multi-site video uploader. The tool will allow video publishers to automatically distribute their content to seven video-sharing sites: YouTube, MySpace, Metacafe, Google, Yahoo, Revver, and Veoh. Tubemogul, which announced a multi-site uploader last week, is adding 3 new distribution sites to its service today, bringing its total reach to 9 video-sharing sites. MY DAMN CHANNEL is a new online video destination launching this morning. The site will emphasize professional, episodic content, and promises to disrupt media by giving content creators artistic freedom. The early roster of professionals includes comedian Harry Shearer, producer Don Was, actor Paul Reiser, and Web phenom Andy Milonakis. MDC will syndicate its content across video-sharing sites, and collect advertising revenue. The site has signed a distribution deal with YouTube. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
you see? it has hot and sweaty workout girls. it's already like an exact mirror of this group. On 31 Jul 2007, at 20:29, Michael Verdi wrote: I joined that group - http://youtube.com/group/videoblogging and posted a message. Hopefully more than just the hot and sweaty workout girl will answer. - Verdi On 7/31/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm up for it. Some of my videos have been racking up 10s of views over the last few weeks and I haven't met anyone yet. Mostly I guess it's a matter of spending time figuring out how things work. I couldn't figure out the group thing either. I did submit a video to an editing group and it got seen a few times. - Verdi On 7/31/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean, not that we'd even have to create a new group: http://youtube.com/group/videoblogging is there already. Unless you think there's a need to start another I'm going to join up there. On 31 Jul 2007, at 19:56, Rupert wrote: So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
correct, frank. these services ARE valuable though. it always comes back to the old point some of us have been making forever... which is to look at these video hosting destination sites as a way to leverage the audiences that traffic them. when we talked about why use youtube the point that always rings true is this to tap into the mass viewer base but with emphasis on bringing those viewers back to your own site if they enjoy your content and want to subscribe to you/your channel(s). the best way to do this is to definately put out content no matter what the tos are but have your content also hosted on either your own host or with services that respect creative commons and/or just have much better terms for you. as a content producer/distributor, you should strategically spread your media, so long as you put care in not soley depending on the youtubes. ideally, uploading teasers/previews or your own commercials promoting your shows or just personal video messages that involve you in those communities and as people get to know you, they will follow you.. wherever your home on the net is. also, if you are making a show, it can help to upload to many services in the beginning. if you get popular, then you wont have to do that as much or at all anymore. that's when you can start having more control. give and take. play it out. for those not interested in promoting shows etc... if you just have something to say and dont care about tos... you just want to get your messages out... then thats another reason why these uploader/tracking services are valuable and time-savers. depends on what you want to achieve through your videos. for some, these services make total sense. however, at any point, these services could be killed off unless proper business relations are made. the youtubes can easily prevent remote/cross uploads and access to tracking data if they feel it is hurting their bottom line or breaking terms of service. typically, an API sets the limits of what can and cannot be done with a service's platform, even if this is not enforced at this time. sull On 7/31/07, Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These multi-site uploaders remind me of the multi-site submit companies (submit your site to over 10,000 search engines!). Never really worked for me... For syndication of video, Media RSS is the solution. Manage once, publish everywhere. It provides ONE place to manage videos, metadata, and all metrics can be consolidated into one place. It provides better control (at least as good as you are going to get nowadays) - if you want a video removed, just remove it from your RSS file. Media RSS is also a great solution to allow people to watch your video in any player they want. Unfortunately, most of these video companies require you to upload your video (and agree to their TOS), so we are still stuck with the upload your video and agree to my TOS problem until these sites become more open networks and accept video feeds. Just my 2 cents. :) -Frank Frank Sinton CEO [EMAIL PROTECTED] frank%40mefeedia.com http://mefeedia.com/user/franks/ http://mefeedia.com - Discover, Collect, and Share video blogs -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com[mailto: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rupert Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:41 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows I'm really excited by the multi-site uploaders. I've been waiting for someone to do this properly. It's important for a lot of reasons. Most of all because most people haven't got time to spend their lives uploading every video to a dozen different sites, entering Titles, Descriptions, tags, etc on each one. So you end up missing out on all the people who frequent sites you haven't uploaded to. I'd far rather spend that time finding other people's videos, watching them and connecting. To reply to J Rhett Aultman: Obviously, it's just the ease of use and range of sites they offer that will make them attractive or not. As far as I'm concerned, progress is all about automation of all the things that have traditionally taken a very long time in making and publishing a videoblog. Blip has great crossposting options, but doesn't let you upload to competitors like youtube - except your myspace blog (not to Myspace Video). Veoh has a more limited range of sites you can cross-post to than those listed by Eric today - and they slap a logo on the front of your video. Plus they screwed up all my audio - put it out of sync, but Halcyon said a couple of weeks ago that it works well for him. Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/ On 31 Jul 2007, at 17:19, J. Rhett Aultman wrote: What makes these sites a preferable choice to other places offering
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
reason why yahoo and google groups are key. because they are mailing lists. email, baby! i wish more services would provide mailing lists, not just alerts and notifications. something i can bring into my gmail account and filter and read entire threads as a thread. key. On 7/31/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
Count me in, [EMAIL PROTECTED], I have 11 short vids on youtube and they do a great job of giving me exposure and even selling a book now and then. I only have about 1,600 views, which doesn't put me in the class of vids of 17 yr old girls, or pet tricks, but it is not bad. OK, thanks, Ed. On 7/31/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
First, I dig that there are these multi-uploader sites. But... as frank said they remind me some of the multi-search engine submit sites. I don't think very highly of them. I think we should talk about how to use these tools and what they're good for. I've been meaning to do a post on risk leveraging ever since I read the Lan Bui/Podtech post. The point is... this. I wouldn't post my entire vlog to youtube. BUT... I would post either select videos, or edited down videos, or lower resolution versions of my videos to other sites. Particularly youtube. The point is... experiment, you don't have to post your whole vlog to youtube. If you're looking for a mass audience... then youtube is a great playground, just don't throw all your eggs into one basket. What I see time and time again is people putting all their faith into one system... i.e. creative commons i.e. flickr... i.e. their own vlog. To put it simply: Creative commons is awesome, but if you put a high definition 30fps complete version of a video online... or a 8megapixel version of you photo and think creative commons is going to protect it you're a fool. Reduce risk by leveraging... put it out at 15 fps, put in online at 320x240 or even 480... post that photo to flickr at max 1600x1200... why the hell post an 8megapixel version of your photo anyway. For those not using youtube or submitting a video to iCaught, or CurrentTV because they don't like the terms of servvice... I'm sorry, but that's just silly. If you're not just posting your videos for friends... if you are seeking new and more varied audiences and your not experimenting and you're not posting to contests, submission sites, youtubes, and other successful social networks... it's sort of silly. ThePan.org and I assume wrecksalvage experimented with what they called interstitials on youtube. They were short 15 second teasers whith heavy branding. That's one extreme way to do it. Youtube Ask A Ninja both post to youtube. Using these multi-submit sites is not going to garner you a youtube following, or myspace or any of these other sites... it's like spam to some sense. If you want to garner an audience in places like myspace, facebook and youtube you have to participate. But it IS a nice tool for getting you started. So... take your best video, make a lowres 320x240 15fps version of it if it's long just take a snippet of it. Watermark the hell out of the mofo with an intro, a watermark in the lower left corner with your brand/url and a nice outro with your url, and then cross post away. But be sure to go and fill out your profile, and mark some friends, and find some interesting groups on these sites and get involved in the content to. This is to say... I'm sorry, but if you're looking for mass audience... just because some site's TOS sucks... doesn't mean you should walk completely away from the game. Leverage... maximize your upside, minimize your downside. If you caught this amazing footage of a an airplane wreck ABC or CNN can't going to use your footage on tv no matter what their TOS says if you dangle a low waulity 8 fps version in front of them and a note saying... if you want it in 24 fps I've got it. TOS don't rule the roost, you're ability to control the content rules the roost. Likewise just putting creative commons on your videos, photos and other media isn't going to protect it if you post insanely high quality versions of it around the web. Anyway, it doesn't do the subject justice. I'm just sick of hearing people say we should just stand on the sidelines for every new game that comes along because they don't have perfect TOS. NOBODY has perfect Terms of Service. Get used to it, and learn to play the game by your own rules. It's called risk leveraging. Just do it. I did a post on risk leveraging regarding famed icelandic Flickr photograper Rebekka Guoleifsdottir who had several $8000 dollars worth of her photos sold on ebay and else where by a UK print seller. The copyright con game and the new economics of IP http://mmeiser.com/blog/2007/05/copyright-con-game-and-new-economics-of.html The bottom line is this. I wholy support her bitch slapping the company that sold her photos illegally just like I support Lan Bui in the Podtech issue, but there's a simple truth here... there was NO reason for her to put her 8 megapixal highres versions of her photos up on Flickr. No reason whatsoever. It's just foolish and naive. Now she's gone the COMPLETE opposite end of the spectrum and only has 640x480 versions available penalizing all her fans completely needlessly when all she had to do is limit her photos on flickr to a reasonable resolution somewhere between 1024 and 1600 pixels. A little subtle watermarking wouldn't hurt either. For vloggers... it's really really simple. Make your videos 320-640 wide... whatever your comfortable with... put your logo/domain name over them in the corner... keep it subtle... put a nice intro
Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows
Great points Frank and Bill. Common sense is not as compelling however as the Frank Sinatra syndrome so many people want to do it my way. FWIW I think TubeMogul started off primarily to gather stats for you from multiple sites. The video uploading is a newer feature, and naturally, it you start there it is easier for them to generate stats, as well as make some moolah off the aggregated content. Aloha, Rox On 7/31/07, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: correct, frank. these services ARE valuable though. it always comes back to the old point some of us have been making forever... which is to look at these video hosting destination sites as a way to leverage the audiences that traffic them. when we talked about why use youtube the point that always rings true is this to tap into the mass viewer base but with emphasis on bringing those viewers back to your own site if they enjoy your content and want to subscribe to you/your channel(s). the best way to do this is to definately put out content no matter what the tos are but have your content also hosted on either your own host or with services that respect creative commons and/or just have much better terms for you. as a content producer/distributor, you should strategically spread your media, so long as you put care in not soley depending on the youtubes. ideally, uploading teasers/previews or your own commercials promoting your shows or just personal video messages that involve you in those communities and as people get to know you, they will follow you.. wherever your home on the net is. also, if you are making a show, it can help to upload to many services in the beginning. if you get popular, then you wont have to do that as much or at all anymore. that's when you can start having more control. give and take. play it out. for those not interested in promoting shows etc... if you just have something to say and dont care about tos... you just want to get your messages out... then thats another reason why these uploader/tracking services are valuable and time-savers. depends on what you want to achieve through your videos. for some, these services make total sense. however, at any point, these services could be killed off unless proper business relations are made. the youtubes can easily prevent remote/cross uploads and access to tracking data if they feel it is hurting their bottom line or breaking terms of service. typically, an API sets the limits of what can and cannot be done with a service's platform, even if this is not enforced at this time. sull On 7/31/07, Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These multi-site uploaders remind me of the multi-site submit companies (submit your site to over 10,000 search engines!). Never really worked for me... For syndication of video, Media RSS is the solution. Manage once, publish everywhere. It provides ONE place to manage videos, metadata, and all metrics can be consolidated into one place. It provides better control (at least as good as you are going to get nowadays) - if you want a video removed, just remove it from your RSS file. Media RSS is also a great solution to allow people to watch your video in any player they want. Unfortunately, most of these video companies require you to upload your video (and agree to their TOS), so we are still stuck with the upload your video and agree to my TOS problem until these sites become more open networks and accept video feeds. Just my 2 cents. :) -Frank Frank Sinton CEO [EMAIL PROTECTED] frank%40mefeedia.com http://mefeedia.com/user/franks/ http://mefeedia.com - Discover, Collect, and Share video blogs -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com[mailto: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rupert Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:41 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] new ways to distribute your shows I'm really excited by the multi-site uploaders. I've been waiting for someone to do this properly. It's important for a lot of reasons. Most of all because most people haven't got time to spend their lives uploading every video to a dozen different sites, entering Titles, Descriptions, tags, etc on each one. So you end up missing out on all the people who frequent sites you haven't uploaded to. I'd far rather spend that time finding other people's videos, watching them and connecting. To reply to J Rhett Aultman: Obviously, it's just the ease of use and range of sites they offer that will make them attractive or not. As far as I'm concerned, progress is all about automation of all the things that have traditionally taken a very long time in making and
[videoblogging] Brotherhood 2.0
A friend pointed this out to me today: http://www.brotherhood2.com/ Q. What is Brotherhood 2.0? A. After noticing that their relationship had for years consisted primarily of emails and instant messages, John and Hank swore off all textual communication with each other for 2007. Instead, we are making public video blogs back and forth every weekday for the entire year. (We get holidays off.) I haven't seen anyone mention it here but it looks interesting. I've watched a few of the videos. They've been going since January and I'm surprised this is the first I've come across it. Catchy sign off, -- Kary Rogers http://karyhead.com
[videoblogging] Re: new ways to distribute your shows
I found the band interviews (only saw the Slash Duff McKagan so far) pretty interesting: http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=50 -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.mydamnchannel.com/ There isnt a huge amount of content yet, mostly warm-up trailers, but I found it quite watchable so far as its fairly tongue-in-cheek. eg: http://www.mydamnchannel.com/hotmentalfreedom.aspx (start your way to a bright non-compensated career in content generation lol) http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=76 http://www.mydamnchannel.com/channel.aspx?episode=100 Cheers Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ed Smith edd66@ wrote: Hi, do you have a link to MY Damn Channel? Thanks, Edward SmithOffer 2 Free life-coaching sessions with an experienced, reputable life coach to purchasers of your book or product, at no cost to you. A proven way to increase your product sales and offer a $250 value to your customers, with no catches. Contact Theresa Smith at 201-568-0019, email, tsmith@ or visit http://brightmoment.com/coaching.htm [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Use Flash 9?
According to Adobe's March, 2007 stats, http://tinyurl.com/zzftm or http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html Flash 9's penetration is a bit above 83% (while Flash 8 is above 96%). I'm still coding and encoding in Flash 8, but see more and more sites requiring Flash 9. Are most of you who encode Flash doing Flash 9? Thanks, Enric -===- http://cirne.com
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Group to complement this one
Well, I've joined, but I'm not toltally sure that group isn't just spam. I'm all for having more excuses to play with youtube, but honestly, I think sull is write. Youtube groups, or any group without email based discussion for that matter is just freaking pointless. Flickr groups are about as sucessful as a group can get with out email... and quite frankly they suck. Particularly a a forum for discussion... which are always almost nonexistent. But... if you post videos there, and chat there, I'll be sure to friend you... and subscribe... and check your posts... when I remember to actually go back and visit it that is... once every couple new moons. -Mike mmeiser.com/blog mefeedia.com On 7/31/07, Ed Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Count me in, [EMAIL PROTECTED], I have 11 short vids on youtube and they do a great job of giving me exposure and even selling a book now and then. I only have about 1,600 views, which doesn't put me in the class of vids of 17 yr old girls, or pet tricks, but it is not bad. OK, thanks, Ed. On 7/31/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I finally figured out how to search for Youtube Groups. I found a couple of dozen groups associated with videoblogging - but none of them had more than a few members, and there were no fresh discussions or activity. Is anybody else here interested in joining a group on Youtube? As per the Facebook group discussion last week, I'd want a group to complement the Yahoo group rather than duplicate it. It'd be a way to share videos and connect with people on Youtube, explore the communities and conversations there, even to inspire us to feel it's worthwhile posting on Youtube, and to find more viewers. If nobody says yes, I won't bother, because the last thing I want to do is create another unpopulated dead Group. But it could be a great way to build a bridge from this group into Youtube, since it's often been remarked that there's so much separation between us. My 'month of Youtube' has been a little slowed down by hectic work home life, but I'm still as committed to exploring it more. As I just wrote in an email to someone else, I do think it's a bit mad that so many of us are not on Youtube more, given the much larger number of people passing through there than through any other site. Youtube has 50%+ share of all online video, but amazingly the mefeedia figures show it has less videoblogs than other sites. I understand that a few people will not want to deal with youtube's TOS, their interface or their picture quality, but for a lot of us who want to connect with other people and evangelize this stuff a little, it surely makes more sense to spend some time hanging out on the main drag as well as behind the bike shed. What do you reckon? Who would want to join? Rupert http://twittervlog.tv/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] State of the Vlogosphere, Vol 2 – Trends in Online Video
LiveVideo is interesting. Unforetuneatly they don't have have RSS 2.0 feeds w/ enclosures or even embedded videos so they won't work with iTunes, Mefeedia, Democracy player, Fireant or any other aggregator. If you use them you should suggest to them that they add MediaRSS and/or enclosures to their feeds. -Mike On 7/30/07, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LiveVideo is chock full of videoblogs. Conspiciously missing. Brook On 7/30/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Mefeedia's put out the latest State of the Vlogospere... http://mefeedia.com/blog/2007/07/202/ See what's happening in the world of vlogging, Internet TV, vodcasting, the NewTube, or whatever you call it. See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. http://ChangeLog.ca/ Vlog Razor... Vlogging News http://vlograzor.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- ___ Brook Hinton film/video/audio art www.brookhinton.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Re: Brotherhood 2.0
Actually I found them via a recommendation from BlogHer. They are too cute for words. I've made a decision of not watching because I don't want to go through withdrawal pains like I did with ZeFrank. They are engaging in a comfort zone kind of way. It is an interesting experiment. It is another aspect of an open book life. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kary Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A friend pointed this out to me today: http://www.brotherhood2.com/ Q. What is Brotherhood 2.0? A. After noticing that their relationship had for years consisted primarily of emails and instant messages, John and Hank swore off all textual communication with each other for 2007. Instead, we are making public video blogs back and forth every weekday for the entire year. (We get holidays off.) I haven't seen anyone mention it here but it looks interesting. I've watched a few of the videos. They've been going since January and I'm surprised this is the first I've come across it. Catchy sign off, -- Kary Rogers http://karyhead.com
[videoblogging] Fwd: Know any Web2.0-ish companies in Atlanta interested in lunch?
-- Forwarded message -- From: Ben Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 31, 2007 5:46 PM Subject: Know any Web2.0-ish companies in Atlanta interested in lunch? *Ben Ramsey wrote:* Know any Web2.0-ish companies in Atlanta interested in lunch? I'm interested in bringing the Lunch 2.0 idea to the Atlanta, GA area, and I'd like to find companies that are interested in participating. If you know of any companies in the Atlanta area that fit the Lunch 2.0 demographic, let me know. I'll poll them to see if there's enough interest to start doing lunch. See http://www.lunch20.com/ for details about Lunch 2.0. http://www.linkedin.com/e/XcLlTwZvNXd-5omoXy7I3mCD_MwWLf/blk/180716029_2/dj8NdjgUcyYNdPoQdOZNtChxbOYWrSlI/advq/ -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: new ways to distribute your shows
I'm not endorsing these sites, and i am loyal to Blip. I just found these bits of news interesting and thought you all might find them interesting as well. what i liked was Frank Sinton's comment, as it occurred to me that i need to look into this service. BTW, would you all consider stripping out quoted text that is not relevant to your post? i read this as an email digest and its a lot to scroll thru to read a few lines of new comments.
[videoblogging] Re: State of the Vlogosphere, Vol 2 Trends in Online Video
Brook, When you say LiveVideo is that a product or the recent explosion in 'live' video (uStream, BlogTV, justin.tv et al)? It's amazing watching the impact of live-streamed video on both audio and video podcasts and blogging. When/if YouTube hits that, we'll see another surge yet again. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LiveVideo is chock full of videoblogs. Conspiciously missing. Brook On 7/30/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Mefeedia's put out the latest State of the Vlogospere... http://mefeedia.com/blog/2007/07/202/ See what's happening in the world of vlogging, Internet TV, vodcasting, the NewTube, or whatever you call it. See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. http://ChangeLog.ca/ Vlog Razor... Vlogging News http://vlograzor.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- ___ Brook Hinton film/video/audio art www.brookhinton.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: new ways to distribute your shows
FYI, Participatory Culture, aka. DemocracyTV, aka. Miro has just blogged about this idea of posting videos to multiple sites... more specifically why it's such a silly thing that we have to. The whole walled garden thing needs to die a horrible death. One day, everyone will be an aggregator. -Mike On 7/31/07, eric gunnar rochow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not endorsing these sites, and i am loyal to Blip. I just found these bits of news interesting and thought you all might find them interesting as well. what i liked was Frank Sinton's comment, as it occurred to me that i need to look into this service. BTW, would you all consider stripping out quoted text that is not relevant to your post? i read this as an email digest and its a lot to scroll thru to read a few lines of new comments. Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: State of the Vlogosphere, Vol 2 – Trends in Online Video
I meant livevideo.com, the site, which definitely isn't a live-real-time video site. -- ___ Brook Hinton film/video/audio art www.brookhinton.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
