[Vo]:new platinum metals

2012-10-16 Thread Peter Gluck
see:

A Chemist Comes Very Close to a Midas Touch:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/science/modern-day-alchemy-has-iron-working-like-platinum.html?pagewanted=all

If confirmed, reconfirmed, extended, deepened and trivialized-
it will be really useful.  Palladium not mentioned (?) for time
given.
Peter


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2012-10-15 20:58, Jed Rothwell wrote:

See:

http://www.hugnetlab.com/celani2/


These are the calibration graphs under Helium with the inert and the 
active (I think, since they received 3 meters of it recently) wires:


http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/86-testcell2-data

Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:new platinum metals

2012-10-16 Thread Axil Axil
Dear Peter:

See

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/01/02/820517/-Superatoms-Cheap-replacements-for-Platinum-and-Palladium


Cheers:   Axil

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 see:

 A Chemist Comes Very Close to a Midas Touch:

 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/science/modern-day-alchemy-has-iron-working-like-platinum.html?pagewanted=all

 If confirmed, reconfirmed, extended, deepened and trivialized-
 it will be really useful.  Palladium not mentioned (?) for time
 given.
 Peter


 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




Re: [Vo]:new platinum metals

2012-10-16 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Axil,

These clusters are present in publications for more years.
I was very enthusiastic thta for example you can make fake flour from
aluminum.
I have asked more famous chemists (one Nobelist, one the president of the
Romanian academy- both my age approx)
And both say, stability is the problem with clusters. This
can change, obviously

Peter


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Peter:

 See


 http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/01/02/820517/-Superatoms-Cheap-replacements-for-Platinum-and-Palladium


 Cheers:   Axil

 On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.comwrote:

 see:

 A Chemist Comes Very Close to a Midas Touch:

 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/science/modern-day-alchemy-has-iron-working-like-platinum.html?pagewanted=all

 If confirmed, reconfirmed, extended, deepened and trivialized-
 it will be really useful.  Palladium not mentioned (?) for time
 given.
 Peter


 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


[Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
Looks like it might have been fairly significant:

http://www.ksla.com/story/19828119/authorities-investigate-loud-boom

http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/



Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

2012-10-16 Thread LORENHEYER
I saw a meteor a couple of nights ago to the west of my location here in 
Reno, Nv.. It was somewhat bright but not too, and lasted for maybe all of 3 
to 4 seconds. It was traveling quite fast, like a meteor, and would likely 
have covered a distance of maybe 500 mi's or so. It (in)obviously appeared to 
have traveled in a NE to SW direction. It   left *no* vapor trail and/or 
didn't appear to burn-up upon entering the atmosphere as would typically be 
expected.   
I've 
seen many so-called meteors over the years that left *no* vapor trail. One 
time, I saw one just as it was entering the atmosphere, very fast like a 
meteor, but quickly exploded, w/o any sound.  On more than a half a dozen 
times, 
over the years, I saw  the more obvious ones that burned w/ a bright greenish 
color, and/or traveled quite a distance and fizzled out with a white 
sparkler-like effect.   
   
  
All of the so-called meteors that I've seen over the years which didn't emit 
any vapor trail, appeared more (in)obviously as a Light being switched 
off, and not as a result of anything burning from any natural spin-off or 
exploded debris that was traveling   around in space for millions or billions 
of years... To me, there's a big difference!. 
Looks 
like it might have been fairly significant:

http://www.ksla.com/story/19828119/authorities-investigate-loud-boom

http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/ /HTML



[Vo]:November Issue Discovery- Bring Back Cold Fusion article

2012-10-16 Thread Ron Kita
Greetings Vortex,

A nicely done website:
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-article-re-widomlarsen-lenr-theory-in-nov-2012-discover-magazineoct-6-2012

Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Note: November issue  Discovery magazine cites: Bushnell,  Zadwodny as well
as Larson s Lattice Energy Corporation-2 pages.


[Vo]:Remember Russ George and Planktos?

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
Well, they are in the news again:

http://io9.com/5952101/a-massive-and-illegal-geoengineering-project-has-been-detected-off-canadas-west-coast

A massive and illegal geoengineering project has been detected off
Canada’s west coast

 George Dvorsky

A private company backed by a controversial U.S. businessman has
unilaterally conducted the world's most significant geoengineering
project to date. Russ George, in conjunction with a First Nations
village on Haida Gwaii, has dumped around 100 tonnes of iron sulphate
into the Pacific Ocean in a technique known as ocean fertilization.
The experiment, which is in violation of two United Nations moratoria,
has outraged environmental, legal, and civic groups.

more



[Vo]:Graphene-based 3D sponge-like material is useful for supercapacitors

2012-10-16 Thread Harvey Norris
http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/10/graphene-based-3d-sponge-like-material-is-useful-for-supercapacitors-2481008.html
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/



[Vo]:Pordenone Report

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
Daniel Passerini completes his four part report:

http://goo.gl/I7LWc

(Googtran)



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
They got wired yesterday:

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/68-wires-incoming



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 They got wired yesterday:

 http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/68-wires-incoming

The images show a lot of flakes coming off the Celani wire inside the plastic.



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Terry:

 They got wired yesterday:

 http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/68-wires-incoming

I confess that I'm educationally challenged on the significance of
what I'm viewing. Can someone give a layman's explanation as to what
these wires or filaments mean?

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:21 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
 From Terry:

 They got wired yesterday:

 http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/68-wires-incoming

 I confess that I'm educationally challenged on the significance of
 what I'm viewing. Can someone give a layman's explanation as to what
 these wires or filaments mean?

It's the treated wire from Celani.  The miracle treatment makes New Fire.



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Terry:


 They got wired yesterday:

 http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/68-wires-incoming

 I confess that I'm educationally challenged on the significance of
 what I'm viewing. Can someone give a layman's explanation as to what
 these wires or filaments mean?

 It's the treated wire from Celani.  The miracle treatment makes New Fire.

Thanks for the qwk response. I had gathered the fact that these
filaments had allegedly been generating a lot more heat than they
ought to be capable of doing. Is there sufficient data in the public
domain at this point to determine x'actly how much excess heat might
have been generated from these filaments. ...or is that what the
peanut gallery is patiently waiting for. ;-)

Has it been determined how hot theses filaments get? The flakes one
can observe suggest the process is somewhat destructive by nature,
which I'd think wouldn't be good for commercial purposes of building
sustainable heat devices that work for an indefinite period.. I wonder
if there is a practical economic work-around.

Incidentally, how much filament was used? i.e. length. anybody know?

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2012-10-16 19:37, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:


Incidentally, how much filament was used? i.e. length. anybody know?


They are about to receive 3x 1m wires.

Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 2012-10-16 19:37, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:

 Incidentally, how much filament was used? i.e. length. anybody know?


 They are about to receive 3x 1m wires.

They received them yesterday.  See the link above.

Steven,  here is Celani's report:

http://www.22passi.it/downloads/PresICCF17_NewA3A.pdf

He has tested the wire up to 900 deg C.



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
 Steven,  here is Celani's report:

 http://www.22passi.it/downloads/PresICCF17_NewA3A.pdf

 He has tested the wire up to 900 deg C.

Got it. Printing out a HC as we speak.

Hmmm... lots of tiny print. Oh well... I still know how to read.

Thanks for indulging me Terry.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2012-10-16 19:45, Terry Blanton wrote:


Steven,  here is Celani's report:

http://www.22passi.it/downloads/PresICCF17_NewA3A.pdf


This version is better:
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Celani_ICCF17_Trasp3.pdf

Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Akira:

...


 This version is better:
 http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Celani_ICCF17_Trasp3.pdf

 Cheers,
 S.A.

Oh, Oh Look! Look at Print. Big Big print! Read read Big Print!

The dyslexic within me thanks you, Akira. Going to kill another tree now.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data

2012-10-16 Thread David Roberson
Great news.  I suspect that this effort will pay off handsomely in our efforts 
to advance LENR products.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 16, 2012 1:56 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hunt Utilities Group calibration data


They got wired yesterday:

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/68-wires-incoming


 


Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread David Roberson

Last evening I made a smaller version of the electrolysis bath and the nickel 
overheated and melted the plastic container at the contact point again as it 
was sparking and spitting.  The heat may be the result of joule heating or some 
other process as the current (3 amps for this test) is concentrated to a small 
region of the nickel due to a heavy coating of some unknown thick white 
material over most of its surface .  Since I want to experiment further along 
this interesting line, I need to use a more robust container that does not melt 
at the temperatures encountered.


I found a small glass jar that measures 2 inches diameter by 4 inches high and 
placed the electrodes within.  After I had started the electrolysis, I began to 
think of safety from gas explosion.  This system is capable of capturing 
hydrogen much better that the old open ones before since the walls are higher 
and the exit path narrow in proportion.


I know that I will have sparks and small flames as with the open system so now 
I would like to know if there is significant danger of explosion.  Is anyone 
aware of reports of a relatively low volume open to the air glass cell 
exploding and causing injury or damage to the surroundings?  Most of the jar 
volume will likely be filled with a mix of  hydrogen and oxygen plus room air.  
I have not calculated the amount of energy contained within the captured 
hydrogen since a bad calculation could be dangerous.  Please give me guidance 
before I reconnect this beast as it now is on standby.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Oct 15, 2012 8:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started


One final note that I want to include.  I allowed the experiment to go into the 
unusual mode for the third time and made some measurements.  The electrolyte 
was boiling as in the first two observations and I also noted sparks being 
emitted.


Unfortunately, I let the system become too hot and it melted the bottom of my 
test container allowing the electrolyte to leak out.  After this episode, I 
obtained a smaller container and started another round of testing.  I will need 
to compete another calibration before useful data can be obtained.


A most interesting afternoon.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Oct 15, 2012 5:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started


I have an interesting addition to this report.  After I cleaned up the deposits 
and added water and electrolyte I let my experiment continue electrolysis.  The 
effect happened again with some interesting differences.  I noticed that the 
thin layer that coated the electrolyte bath came in the form of small floating 
islands about the size of a standard pencil lead.  These came together to form 
a film over the surface.  A much thicker deposit formed upon the active nickel 
that is like a form of crust.


Then I noticed that sparks were being emitted from the edge of the active 
nickel!  The sparks came intermittently and the intensity of the sparks varied. 
 I saw actual flames on rare occasions which had me alarmed.  Perhaps this is 
caused by the hydrogen becoming ignited at that electrode.  The water between 
electrodes was at boiling temperature.


I noticed that the supply voltage was varying by a large degree in the fashion 
of bubble bursting which could be due to the reduced path for ions to the 
nickel that is now covered with the white hard deposit.


Next, I tapped the deposit mostly off of the nickels and added water to the 
bath.  The surface deposit was stirred up so that things are returning toward 
normal.  There still remains a layer of the white deposit on the top of the 
active nickel from which bubbles of hydrogen are exiting.


This experiment is getting more interesting all the time.  I hope to get to the 
bottom of the observations, but I have no idea what is occurring.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Oct 15, 2012 3:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started


I had an exciting afternoon.  I replaced my control nickel with the 40 plus 
hour heat treated one that resembles an old penny now and began electrolysis.


The reading of voltage was a bit unusual after the first hour of operation so I 
replenished the water and added a little additional sodium carbonate to allow 
the system to reach equilibrium.  Just before I started to make the standard 
readings after approximately an hour of additional electrolysis a friend called 
me on the telephone so I was diverted.  We spoke for I would guess about half 
an hour until line noise convinced me to go upstairs to accept another call.  
Both of us changed telephones but the noise was still bad as we continued our 
conversation.


Perhaps 30 minutes later we finished the call and I went back to make 

Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

2012-10-16 Thread LORENHEYER
So anyway, whenever you happen to hear of a loud sonic boom that may or may 
not have been associated with a Meteorite entering the astmosphere, it 
might have only been caused by a next-door neighbor's clumsyness, or some 
accident-prone person just trying to do some everyday ordinary unfamiliar 
thing, 
or maybe it was a worn out vehicle or motorcycle that backfired, or maybe a 
Terrorist moved in across the street and hasn't quite refined his Bomb making 
skills, or maybe it's Our Great Wanabe Dictator BO stinking up the dumb 
gullible Whitie House, as he plans to suck it and this Country dry, and/or the 
entire world.. this man (?) really sucks Ha Ha!  

 Whatever the case, you should remember that it's our nature to take 
great comfort in all the sounds in this natural world, and/or the disasterous 
catastrophic obtrusive chaotic loud yakity rakity spine-shivering rather 
horrific noise that ourkind tends to make (tee hee).  /HTML



Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread Alan J Fletcher


At 11:30 AM 10/16/2012, David Roberson wrote:
I know
that I will have sparks and small flames as with the open system so now I
would like to know if there is significant danger of explosion. Is
anyone aware of reports of a relatively low volume open to the air glass
cell exploding and causing injury or damage to the surroundings?
Most of the jar volume will likely be filled with a mix of hydrogen
and oxygen plus room air. I have not calculated the amount of
energy contained within the captured hydrogen since a bad calculation
could be dangerous. Please give me guidance before I reconnect this
beast as it now is on standby.
This paper looks at various combinations

http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2005/Papers/120001.pdf
H2-Air -- lower explosion limit is 4.3 mole% H2
H2-O -- lower explosion limit is 4 mole% H2
Can you put in a baffle or something to keep the H and O separate? 
Maybe a U-tube would be better than a jar.





[Vo]:Popular Science article Andrea Rossi's Black Box

2012-10-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
I got a chance to read this article. It is mostly about Rossi, and only a
little about other researchers.

It is mostly a human interest story about Rossi and his many annoying
quirks and habits. After the author went all the way to Italy to interview
Rossi, Rossi abruptly cancelled. Then argued for a day, then un-cancelled
and met. It sounds typical of Rossi.

Then the author went to meet and interview some skeptics who knew nothing
about cold fusion. They dismissed researchers as a bunch of no-account
amateurs. They apparently have not read anything and they know nothing
about the results. They dismiss the claims because the heat far exceeds the
limits of chemistry. That is the very reason the researchers think the
effect is real! The seem unaware of the contradiction. I think it is a
waste of time talking to such people, but I am glad their views have been
published in the mass media.

The last section describes a visit with Celani before he went to Texas. It
is generally positive.

There are no technical details in this article. There are some mistakes,
such as the claim that Rossi's degree is from Kensington U. in California.
That is a fake PhD. He has a genuine engineering degree from an Italian
university. (I do not recall which one.) There is no doubt that Rossi is a
skilled, accomplished engineer with many important inventions to his name,
including some lucrative ones such as his biofuel Diesel engines.

The author of this article attended the Williamsburg conference and was
surprised that no one there flat out called Rossi a scammer. I think he
failed to understand it is no great leap for the people at that conference
to accept that Rossi is probably right. It is no big deal. Just about
everyone at that conference has seen the cold fusion effect first-hand,
including me. We have no doubt at all that cold fusion itself is real. We
also think it is likely the Ni-H version works. A lot of us (including me)
respect Piantelli and Focardi. Based on that, it is reasonable to conclude
that Rossi's claims are probably true. His tests have been ludicrous as
everyone knows, but convincing nonetheless. The very same thing can be said
for the light water tests by Patterson. Rossi is a terribly annoying prima
donna, but so is Arata, and so were many other important scientists and
other important people in history. Such as Gen. George Custer and Gen.
George Patton. They were both superb generals, but they were such
out-of-control egomanics and jerks that Custer got himself and his men
killed for no reason, and Patton almost got himself fired for slapping a
soldier in a hospital.

You do not want to judge Rossi's claims with reference to Rossi's
personality or his legal problems. The guy makes more trouble for himself
than anyone I have ever encountered, with the possible exception of Russ
George who is apparently conducting a gigantic illegal experiment in the
ocean.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread Jeff Berkowitz
As others have pointed out, the only safe answer is to treat all
electrolysis experiments with respect, doing them with adequate
ventilation, whether that means under a fume hood or outdoors or the like.

Of course we may break these rules and get away with many things, up until
the unfortunate moment when we don't get away with it.

Jeff

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:

  At 11:30 AM 10/16/2012, David Roberson wrote:

 I know that I will have sparks and small flames as with the open system so
 now I would like to know if there is significant danger of explosion.  Is
 anyone aware of reports of a relatively low volume open to the air glass
 cell exploding and causing injury or damage to the surroundings?  Most of
 the jar volume will likely be filled with a mix of  hydrogen and oxygen
 plus room air.  I have not calculated the amount of energy contained within
 the captured hydrogen since a bad calculation could be dangerous.  Please
 give me guidance before I reconnect this beast as it now is on standby.


 This paper looks at various combinations
  http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2005/Papers/120001.pdf

 H2-Air  -- lower explosion limit is 4.3 mole% H2
 H2-O -- lower explosion limit is 4 mole% H2

 Can you put in a baffle or something to keep the H and O separate?
 Maybe a U-tube would be better than a jar.




Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread Axil Axil
would two jars connented by a wire work?

http://www.water4gasstore.com/product-p/dmjs002.htm


Cheers:Axil

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:

  At 11:30 AM 10/16/2012, David Roberson wrote:

 I know that I will have sparks and small flames as with the open system so
 now I would like to know if there is significant danger of explosion.  Is
 anyone aware of reports of a relatively low volume open to the air glass
 cell exploding and causing injury or damage to the surroundings?  Most of
 the jar volume will likely be filled with a mix of  hydrogen and oxygen
 plus room air.  I have not calculated the amount of energy contained within
 the captured hydrogen since a bad calculation could be dangerous.  Please
 give me guidance before I reconnect this beast as it now is on standby.


 This paper looks at various combinations
  http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2005/Papers/120001.pdf

 H2-Air  -- lower explosion limit is 4.3 mole% H2
 H2-O -- lower explosion limit is 4 mole% H2

 Can you put in a baffle or something to keep the H and O separate?
 Maybe a U-tube would be better than a jar.




Re: [Vo]:Popular Science article Andrea Rossi's Black Box

2012-10-16 Thread Daniel Rocha
Somewhere I've seen that's a master of sciences, which back then was the
maximum degree, I think.

2012/10/16 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com

 Rossi's degree is from U. Milan:


 http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3197200.ece/BINARY/Rossi_degree_University_Milan.pdf

 Not a PhD, but I gather it is somewhat more than a B.A.

 - Jed




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

2012-10-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Looks like it might have been fairly significant:

 http://www.ksla.com/story/19828119/authorities-investigate-loud-boom

 http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/

A significant underground black powder bunker:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/military-explosion-shakes-louisiana-article-1.1184633



[Vo]:Cracks me up

2012-10-16 Thread Jeff Berkowitz
When I read vortex, Google is constantly trying to sell me a Ford Fusion.
 If only ...  ;-)


Re: [Vo]:Graphene-based 3D sponge-like material is useful for supercapacitors

2012-10-16 Thread fznidarsic
I hope this works.  I recently looked into powering my bicycle.


1.  2 cycle 50 cc engine.  $120.  Cheep!  The two cycle engine has a limited 
speed rage in which it delivers power.  It tried one of these.  It either goes 
fast 10 to 15 MPH or does not go at all.


2.  4 cycle 50 cc engine $400.   More cost!  The 4 cycle engine has a little 
less power but a wider range of speed.  It.  It will go slower when you need to 
negotiate obstacles.


3.  Electric lead acid.  Cost $400.   Same as the 4 cycle engine.  The 
batteries are heavy and will go only a few miles if they have to climb a slight 
grade.  You will need a better kick stand to hold the bicycle up.


4.  Electric Lithium ion.  Cost $1,000  Very much cost for a simple bicycle.  
Will go 40 miles on the flat.


I concluded the internal combustion engine is cheep and an equivalent electric 
has a long way to go in reducing costs even for a bicycle.




Frank Znidarsic



-Original Message-
From: Harvey Norris harv...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 16, 2012 12:30 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Graphene-based 3D sponge-like material is useful for 
supercapacitors


http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/10/graphene-based-3d-sponge-like-material-is-useful-for-supercapacitors-2481008.html
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/


 


Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread David Roberson
Thanks Alan,


I became chicken and decided to find an alternate container.  The local grocery 
store had pyrex storage containers that were relatively small and flat so I got 
one and am using it.  I was worried about the hydrogen collection with a ready 
ignition source.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 16, 2012 3:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started


At 11:30 AM 10/16/2012, David Roberson wrote:

I knowthat I will have sparks and small flames as with the open system so now 
Iwould like to know if there is significant danger of explosion.  Isanyone 
aware of reports of a relatively low volume open to the air glasscell exploding 
and causing injury or damage to the surroundings? Most of the jar volume will 
likely be filled with a mix of  hydrogenand oxygen plus room air.  I have not 
calculated the amount ofenergy contained within the captured hydrogen since a 
bad calculationcould be dangerous.  Please give me guidance before I reconnect 
thisbeast as it now is on standby.

This paper looks at various combinations
http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2005/Papers/120001.pdf

H2-Air  -- lower explosion limit is 4.3 mole% H2
H2-O -- lower explosion limit is 4 mole% H2

Can you put in a baffle or something to keep the H and O separate? 
Maybe a U-tube would be better than a jar.


 


Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread David Roberson
I finally obtained a safe alternative that is working at the moment.  I am 
getting sparks and all.  Thanks for the idea.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started


would two jars connented by a wire work?
 
http://www.water4gasstore.com/product-p/dmjs002.htm
 
 
Cheers:Axil


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:


At 11:30 AM 10/16/2012, David Roberson wrote:

I knowthat I will have sparks and small flames as with the open system so now 
Iwould like to know if there is significant danger of explosion.  Isanyone 
aware of reports of a relatively low volume open to the air glasscell exploding 
and causing injury or damage to the surroundings? Most of the jar volume will 
likely be filled with a mix of  hydrogenand oxygen plus room air.  I have not 
calculated the amount ofenergy contained within the captured hydrogen since a 
bad calculationcould be dangerous.  Please give me guidance before I reconnect 
thisbeast as it now is on standby.


This paper looks at various combinations
http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2005/Papers/120001.pdf

H2-Air  -- lower explosion limit is 4.3 mole% H2
H2-O -- lower explosion limit is 4 mole% H2

Can you put in a baffle or something to keep the H and O separate? 
Maybe a U-tube would be better than a jar.





 


Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread Chuck Sites
David,

I never had any problems either with an open system or a closed system.
 Just remember that hydrogen like to burn straight up, so if running
covered, be sure the cover can be easily removed upward.   When I ran
closed, I used a large cork at the top, and all the gasses tended to
recombine it the space between the top and the liquid.
Since you have already saw a flame and sparks, you might want to submerge
the jar in a water bath for a calorimetry measurements as well as to
provide some safety.   Just be careful, be prepared and use your better
judgement.

Best Regards,
Chuck


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:30 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

  Last evening I made a smaller version of the electrolysis bath and the
 nickel overheated and melted the plastic container at the contact point
 again as it was sparking and spitting.  The heat may be the result of joule
 heating or some other process as the current (3 amps for this test) is
 concentrated to a small region of the nickel due to a heavy coating of some
 unknown thick white material over most of its surface .  Since I want to
 experiment further along this interesting line, I need to use a more robust
 container that does not melt at the temperatures encountered.

  I found a small glass jar that measures 2 inches diameter by 4 inches
 high and placed the electrodes within.  After I had started the
 electrolysis, I began to think of safety from gas explosion.  This system
 is capable of capturing hydrogen much better that the old open ones before
 since the walls are higher and the exit path narrow in proportion.

  I know that I will have sparks and small flames as with the open system
 so now I would like to know if there is significant danger of explosion.
  Is anyone aware of reports of a relatively low volume open to the
 air glass cell exploding and causing injury or damage to the surroundings?
  Most of the jar volume will likely be filled with a mix of  hydrogen and
 oxygen plus room air.  I have not calculated the amount of energy contained
 within the captured hydrogen since a bad calculation could be dangerous.
  Please give me guidance before I reconnect this beast as it now is on
 standby.

  Dave


 -Original Message-
 From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
 To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Mon, Oct 15, 2012 8:45 pm
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

  One final note that I want to include.  I allowed the experiment to go
 into the unusual mode for the third time and made some measurements.  The
 electrolyte was boiling as in the first two observations and I also noted
 sparks being emitted.

  Unfortunately, I let the system become too hot and it melted the bottom
 of my test container allowing the electrolyte to leak out.  After this
 episode, I obtained a smaller container and started another round of
 testing.  I will need to compete another calibration before useful data can
 be obtained.

  A most interesting afternoon.

  Dave


 -Original Message-
 From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
 To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Mon, Oct 15, 2012 5:35 pm
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

  I have an interesting addition to this report.  After I cleaned up the
 deposits and added water and electrolyte I let my experiment continue
 electrolysis.  The effect happened again with some interesting differences.
  I noticed that the thin layer that coated the electrolyte bath came in the
 form of small floating islands about the size of a standard pencil lead.
  These came together to form a film over the surface.  A much thicker
 deposit formed upon the active nickel that is like a form of crust.

  Then I noticed that sparks were being emitted from the edge of the
 active nickel!  The sparks came intermittently and the intensity of the
 sparks varied.  I saw actual flames on rare occasions which had me alarmed.
  Perhaps this is caused by the hydrogen becoming ignited at that electrode.
  The water between electrodes was at boiling temperature.

  I noticed that the supply voltage was varying by a large degree in the
 fashion of bubble bursting which could be due to the reduced path for ions
 to the nickel that is now covered with the white hard deposit.

  Next, I tapped the deposit mostly off of the nickels and added water to
 the bath.  The surface deposit was stirred up so that things are returning
 toward normal.  There still remains a layer of the white deposit on the top
 of the active nickel from which bubbles of hydrogen are exiting.

  This experiment is getting more interesting all the time.  I hope to get
 to the bottom of the observations, but I have no idea what is occurring.

  Dave


 -Original Message-
 From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
 To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Mon, Oct 15, 2012 3:54 pm
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

  I had an exciting afternoon.  I replaced my control nickel with the 40
 plus hour heat treated one 

Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

2012-10-16 Thread David Roberson
Black powder?  I melted down my 6 pounder a long time ago when smokeless came 
on line.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 16, 2012 7:25 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Looks like it might have been fairly significant:

 http://www.ksla.com/story/19828119/authorities-investigate-loud-boom

 http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/

A significant underground black powder bunker:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/military-explosion-shakes-louisiana-article-1.1184633


 


Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

2012-10-16 Thread ChemE Stewart
Sounds relatively harmless to me...I am worried about some of that dark
stuff orbiting into a nuclear spent fuel pool

The bayou corrne sinkhole/seismic has stuff bubbling up 50 miles away.
 Many people will probably never be let back in their homes.

On Tuesday, October 16, 2012, David Roberson wrote:

 Black powder?  I melted down my 6 pounder a long time ago when smokeless
 came on line.

  Dave


 -Original Message-
 From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'hohlr...@gmail.com');
 To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');
 Sent: Tue, Oct 16, 2012 7:25 pm
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

  On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com 
 javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'hohlr...@gmail.com'); wrote:
  Looks like it might have been fairly significant:
 
  http://www.ksla.com/story/19828119/authorities-investigate-loud-boom
 
  http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/

 A significant underground black powder bunker:
 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/military-explosion-shakes-louisiana-article-1.1184633




Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer Seized

2012-10-16 Thread Jojo Jaro

So, let me get this straight.

So, Bill Gates quits his schooling to start Microsoft.  Invested his savings 
into the venture.  Worked hard day and night to perfect his software.  Works 
long days to market his software.  Used his skill and charisma to win an 
account with IBM, gets lucky and makes a Billion.  But it did not stopped 
there.  He worked long hours at Microsoft.  Poured his heart out.  Exhausted 
every skill.  Worked very hard to build a credible software company, 
outcompeting every other competitor.  Now, he is harvesting the fruits of 
his labor, and some idiot comes along and says he is not working hard, and 
wants to redistribute his money hard earned thru charisma, luck and hard 
work.


Yeah, that's right, Bill Gates DID NOT work hard for his money.  OK 

That's why I despise socialists and communists.  They just want to steal the 
fruits of your labor.  It's a retrograde and thieving philosophy hatched out 
of the minds of lazy bums.




Jojo



- Original Message - 
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer Seized



How does one measure hard work?

How much harder does Bill Gates work in comparison to someone who
works two jobs at minimum wage?
Do you seriously he imagine he works 100 times harder if his income is
100 times greater?



Do you believe a man with backhoe works 100 times harder than a man with 
shovel?


Harry

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
This idea that poverty is the root cause of criminality is at best naive 
and

at worst moronic.  This can only come from the liberal minds of
socialistic/communistic people who think that Income Redistribution is 
the

panacea for all societal ills.  My friend, stealing from people who work
hard for their income and redistribute it to lazy bums will not cure
sociatal ills.  You are smarter than to believe in that solution.

Let's take a real life example.  The United States has more felons and
criminals on a per capita basis than any other country in the world,
including such 4th world countries like the Philippines who are poverty
stricken to the core.  The United States is flushed in food and resources
and conveniences, and yet manage to produce more criminals and felons 
than
any other country.  Please, I would like to hear your explanation why the 
US

has more criminals than the Philippines (on a per capita basis).


Jojo


PS. The root cause of crime is not poverty. but rather the inherent sin 
and

rebellion in the hearts of a glutonous, rebellious and lazy society.






- Original Message -
From: Jouni Valkonen
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer 
Seized



I would think that only way to combat this problem is to eliminate 
poverty
from the society. About 95% of the criminality is due to unjust 
distribution
of wealth. This is not that individual humans would resort into 
criminality

if they fail to find job due to high unemployment rates, but because
children are crown in the conditions where no children should be allowed 
to

live.

Best way to eliminate poverty is to set zero income level for each
individuals into 1000-2000 dollars per month. This can be done quite 
easily
by distributing income more justly. When there is no scarcity of the 
basic
needs, there won't be breeding grounds for violent gangs and violent 
larger
scale religions, because every child will get a proper and free 
education.









Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer Seized

2012-10-16 Thread ChemE Stewart
JoJo,

I like it.

On Wednesday, October 3, 2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:

 So, let me get this straight.

 So, Bill Gates quits his schooling to start Microsoft.  Invested his
 savings into the venture.  Worked hard day and night to perfect his
 software.  Works long days to market his software.  Used his skill and
 charisma to win an account with IBM, gets lucky and makes a Billion.  But
 it did not stopped there.  He worked long hours at Microsoft.  Poured his
 heart out.  Exhausted every skill.  Worked very hard to build a credible
 software company, outcompeting every other competitor.  Now, he is
 harvesting the fruits of his labor, and some idiot comes along and says he
 is not working hard, and wants to redistribute his money hard earned thru
 charisma, luck and hard work.

 Yeah, that's right, Bill Gates DID NOT work hard for his money.  OK 

 That's why I despise socialists and communists.  They just want to steal
 the fruits of your labor.  It's a retrograde and thieving philosophy
 hatched out of the minds of lazy bums.



 Jojo



 - Original Message - From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:43 AM
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer Seized


  How does one measure hard work?

 How much harder does Bill Gates work in comparison to someone who
 works two jobs at minimum wage?
 Do you seriously he imagine he works 100 times harder if his income is
 100 times greater?



 Do you believe a man with backhoe works 100 times harder than a man with
 shovel?

 Harry

 On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:

 This idea that poverty is the root cause of criminality is at best naive
 and
 at worst moronic.  This can only come from the liberal minds of
 socialistic/communistic people who think that Income Redistribution is
 the
 panacea for all societal ills.  My friend, stealing from people who work
 hard for their income and redistribute it to lazy bums will not cure
 sociatal ills.  You are smarter than to believe in that solution.

 Let's take a real life example.  The United States has more felons and
 criminals on a per capita basis than any other country in the world,
 including such 4th world countries like the Philippines who are poverty
 stricken to the core.  The United States is flushed in food and resources
 and conveniences, and yet manage to produce more criminals and felons
 than
 any other country.  Please, I would like to hear your explanation why
 the US
 has more criminals than the Philippines (on a per capita basis).


 Jojo


 PS. The root cause of crime is not poverty. but rather the inherent sin
 and
 rebellion in the hearts of a glutonous, rebellious and lazy society.





 - Original Message -
 From: Jouni Valkonen
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:50 AM
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer
 Seized


 I would think that only way to combat this problem is to eliminate
 poverty
 from the society. About 95% of the criminality is due to unjust
 distribution
 of wealth. This is not that individual humans would resort into
 criminality
 if they fail to find job due to high unemployment rates, but because
 children are crown in the conditions where no children should be allowed
 to
 live.

 Best way to eliminate poverty is to set zero income level for each
 individuals into 1000-2000 dollars per month. This can be done quite
 easily
 by distributing income more justly. When there is no scarcity of the
 basic
 needs, there won't be breeding grounds for violent gangs and violent
 larger
 scale religions, because every child will get a proper and free
 education.







Re: [Vo]:Meteorite in NW Louisiana

2012-10-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
I am confused. Are these two unrelated stories?

It seems there was a meteorite and shortly after it passed -- purely by
coincidence -- there was a large explosion, which was some sort of bunker
on the ground. It wasn't like the meteorite whacked the bunker.

Do I have that right? I read the accounts a few times but I don't get it.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer Seized

2012-10-16 Thread Jed Rothwell

 Joro Jaro wrote:



 So, let me get this straight.

 So, Bill Gates quits his schooling to start Microsoft.  . . .




 Now, he is harvesting the fruits of his labor, and some idiot comes along
 and says he is not working hard, and wants to redistribute his money hard
 earned thru charisma, luck and hard work.

 Yeah, that's right, Bill Gates DID NOT work hard for his money.  OK 

 That's why I despise socialists and communists.


You have the story right. However, you did not say the name of the bum who
wants to redistribute Gates' money. The guy who favors higher taxes on the
rich, and who is campaigning to preserve the inheritance tax. That stinking
bum is:

Bill Gates

Gates himself, along with many other self-made wealthy people, including
Buffet and me, are in favor of modest redistribution tax policy. We think
it is not fair that people like Buffet pay lower taxes than a secretary or
a bus driver. We are not socialists or communists. We have a right to our
opinions.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started

2012-10-16 Thread Eric Walker
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

I finally obtained a safe alternative that is working at the moment.  I am
 getting sparks and all.  Thanks for the idea.


Does anyone know if sparks are common?  What is the amperage per cm^2?

Eric


[Vo]:Hypothetically speaking ...

2012-10-16 Thread Jones Beene
Ever since the Rossi demo 20 months ago - where the possibility arose that
an unusual type of multiplier effect existed with nickel hydride, which
both produced excess heat but also relied on input heat from an electric
cartridge heater for continuity ... doubts have been cast on that basic M.O.
(modus operandi)

After all, if a reaction is gainful - then why would it need continuing
electrical input at all? There are answers  to this question - but they are
not entirely satisfactory.

Of course, there is also the claim that on occasion, the nickel-hydride
reaction is self-sustaining for periods of time, which can vary from short
to long.  Consequently, we must surmise that the electrical input is
necessary to maintain a threshold condition for those times when the
instantaneous gain drops below a certain average gain and the time constant
for sustainability is more rapid than expected.

If the threshold (trigger temperature) is the point to stay above, since an
rapid quenching condition results below it - and during less robust periods,
should it not be maintained, it is impossible to recover... then what we are
talking about is the need for some type of thermal momentum to average out
what is really a highly variable gain, and one with hidden rapid
consequences. 

An interesting question, then, is why not dispense with ALL ELECTRICAL
INPUT, at least in the design of one specific experiment, using an insulated
kiln for the heat source. Since we are looking for sustainability only in
this experiment, and not the details of operation, we can dispense with
almost everything else as well. No thermocouples or plumbing, no valves or
fancy reactor - just a pipe filled with nickel nanopowder mix, a hydride for
the hydrogen - evacuated and sealed... then placed into a hot kiln where we
will have perhaps a hundred pounds of preheated mass (for thermal momentum).


Once the trigger condition for gain from nickel-hydride has been met in the
sealed pipe, gas to the kiln is turned off - with the expectation that the
gain from the pipe, along with the thermal momentum from the large mass of
hot refractory bricks - will continue to maintain the average gain, thus
providing continuity for a much longer period than expected. A month or two
of continuous operation of the kiln with no input should remove all doubt.

Jones


attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer Seized

2012-10-16 Thread Craig Haynie


On 10/16/2012 11:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:


Gates himself, along with many other self-made wealthy people, 
including Buffet and me, are in favor of modest redistribution tax 
policy. We think it is not fair that people like Buffet pay lower 
taxes than a secretary or a bus driver. We are not socialists or 
communists. We have a right to our opinions.



If you keep bringing up politics, then I have to keep challenging you on it.

'People like Buffet' pay lower income tax rates because their income is 
generally based on capital gains. This is not the same kind of an income 
as that of a bus driver, for these reasons:


1) A bus driver's income is consistent from year to year. A person who 
lives on capital gains, does not have a stable income. Frequently, years 
go by when he loses money.


2) Capital gains is not indexed for inflation. So, say there is a 7.2% 
inflation rate. If a piece of capital is held for ten years, and if it 
doubles in value over those ten years, then there is no increase in 
wealth over the increase created from the inflation rate. Yet, if the 
capital is sold, then it will incur a 15% tax rate on the difference in 
value from the purchase price and the sale price. So, in effect, the 
capital will be sold for the same price as that for which it was paid, 
and yet the owner will still pay a 15% tax on the difference in price. 
This is an effective loss, for which the owner is taxed.


The two forms of income cannot be compared, and yet people still want to 
try. Sometimes, people will say that some of the wealthiest people pay 
no taxes, but what they are referring to is the special case that occurs 
when some people actually lose money over the course of a year. The US 
government has never had a wealth tax, and if wealth is lost during a 
year, then no tax is owed. The wealthiest Americans will frequently lose 
wealth during bad years, and pay no income tax. This is correct and 
expected.


Buffet does not pay lower taxes. Rather, his tax rate cannot be compared 
to other forms of income in an honest fashion.


Craig





Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer Seized

2012-10-16 Thread Jeff Berkowitz
Sure it can. I make such a comparison right here.
http://pdxjjb-econ-politics.blogspot.com/2012/05/parable-of-smart-frugal.html

It's not that your arguments are incorrect, but they are not very strong
arguments, either.

Jeff

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.comwrote:


 On 10/16/2012 11:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:


 Gates himself, along with many other self-made wealthy people, including
 Buffet and me, are in favor of modest redistribution tax policy. We think
 it is not fair that people like Buffet pay lower taxes than a secretary or
 a bus driver. We are not socialists or communists. We have a right to our
 opinions.

  If you keep bringing up politics, then I have to keep challenging you on
 it.

 'People like Buffet' pay lower income tax rates because their income is
 generally based on capital gains. This is not the same kind of an income as
 that of a bus driver, for these reasons:

 1) A bus driver's income is consistent from year to year. A person who
 lives on capital gains, does not have a stable income. Frequently, years go
 by when he loses money.

 2) Capital gains is not indexed for inflation. So, say there is a 7.2%
 inflation rate. If a piece of capital is held for ten years, and if it
 doubles in value over those ten years, then there is no increase in wealth
 over the increase created from the inflation rate. Yet, if the capital is
 sold, then it will incur a 15% tax rate on the difference in value from the
 purchase price and the sale price. So, in effect, the capital will be sold
 for the same price as that for which it was paid, and yet the owner will
 still pay a 15% tax on the difference in price. This is an effective loss,
 for which the owner is taxed.

 The two forms of income cannot be compared, and yet people still want to
 try. Sometimes, people will say that some of the wealthiest people pay no
 taxes, but what they are referring to is the special case that occurs when
 some people actually lose money over the course of a year. The US
 government has never had a wealth tax, and if wealth is lost during a year,
 then no tax is owed. The wealthiest Americans will frequently lose wealth
 during bad years, and pay no income tax. This is correct and expected.

 Buffet does not pay lower taxes. Rather, his tax rate cannot be compared
 to other forms of income in an honest fashion.

 Craig






Re: [Vo]:Sci. Am. comments on documentary The Believers

2012-10-16 Thread Ruby


No Tweets from 137 tonite of the first premiere.

The Chicago Sun Times picks up on what James Martinez said about cold 
fusion being the key to liberating the human race!!!


here's news from days ago..

Chicago Sun Times
Films to See During the Chicago festival's first week by Bill Stamets 
October 11, 2012


http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/movies/15684755-421/films-to-see-during-the-chicago-festivals-first-week.html
The Believers (USA), 8 p.m.: Documentaries on the history of science 
are rare. Chicago directors Clayton Brown and Monica Long Ross, with 
backing from the Richard H. Driehaus Fund, go back to an infamous 1989 
press conference at the University of Utah, when scientists Martin 
Fleisch­mann and Stanley Pons claimed their experiments proved cold 
fusion could generate power from water. Instead of delving into the bad 
physics, the film focuses on celebrity and career. Also unanswered: Why 
believe faulty experiments are the key to liberating the human race? 
Also, 2 p.m. Oct. 20.



Chicago filmmakers on The Believers
http://www.wgntv.com/news/wgntv-chicago-filmmakers-on-the-believers-20121011,0,4999250.story
TVNews puts video together with historical footage, and presumably clips 
from The Believers, with video of the directors talking about the 
importance of understanding the science all around us.




On 10/15/12 3:01 PM, Robert Dorr wrote:


Jed, I see where Mary YouKnow got her 2 cents in. I actually think 
this may be a good documentary, and I stress the may be.


Bob

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/psi-vid/2012/10/14/the-believers-cold-fusion-at-the-chicago-international-film-festival/ 



I get a bad feeling about this documentary. I don't like the trailer.

- Jed



--
Ruby Carat
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org http://www.coldfusionnow.org