Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
Robin wrote: ...and both chose the number three because we live in a 3 dimensional universe. And we live on the 3rd planet from the sun (between three jovian planets) northwest of the Bermuda Triangle. Regards Fred President CEO, Third Planet Industries InK. :-) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
thomas malloy wrote: John E W Keeley believed that there were three subunits that made up the atom, Dale Pond created an excellent graphic showing three spheres dancing around one another, It can be seen at http://www.svpvril.com/astro.html#animatedtriplet Robin van Spaandonk wrote: ...and both chose the number three because we live in a 3 dimensional universe. Hi All, Yes, and there is no fourth physical dimension. Time is just a series of events that we keep track of. Of course, Time can be treated as a dimension for mathematical convenience. A corollary is that there is no physical space-time. I can't prove that there are no more than 3 physical dimensions, but I also can't prove that no more than 30 angels can stand on the head of a pin at the same time. Jack Smith
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:32:35 -0600: Hi, [snip] All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a 3 dimensional universe. There's a nonsequitor if ever I head one. Not if you had been following the thread. I think that the universe is more complicated John E W Keeley believed that there were three subunits that made up the atom, Dale Pond created an excellent graphic showing three spheres dancing around one another, It can be seen at http://www.svpvril.com/astro.html#animatedtriplet ...and both chose the number three because we live in a 3 dimensional universe. Did anyone look at Dale Pond's graphic on SVPVRIL? He built a machine based on Keeley's design for the Dynasphere, and named it Atlin. He says that it works on the Strong Force, by love.. Women like it, that would be reason enough to get one. Dale has published a book, which is all I can afford...to be continued. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:32:35 -0600: Hi, [snip] All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a 3 dimensional universe. There's a nonsequitor if ever I head one. Not if you had been following the thread. John E W Keeley believed that there were three subunits that made up the atom, Dale Pond created an excellent graphic showing three spheres dancing around one another, It can be seen at http://www.svpvril.com/astro.html#animatedtriplet ...and both chose the number three because we live in a 3 dimensional universe. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
At 03:20 pm 20/03/2006 +1100, you wrote: In reply to Grimer's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:46:28 +: Hi, [snip] Or even one come to that - a string of ones and zeros. One doesn't have to use the three Cartesian coordinates to define space. one could use the locations along a big ball of wool. It may not be so convenient but is would be just as effective. You're ball of wool is still 3 dimensional. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk Of course it is. I'm well aware of that. 8-) And a chess board is a lot of black squares on a white ground. But it is also a lot of white squares on a black ground. Can't you see that? You should really read those marvellous books on mathematics by W W Sawyer and let some fresh air into your stuffy three dimensional prison cell. ;-) Frank Frank (You're ball of wool - I deny it. g )
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
- Original Message - At 03:20 pm 20/03/2006 +1100, you wrote: In reply to Grimer's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:46:28 +: Hi, [snip] Or even one come to that - a string of ones and zeros. One doesn't have to use the three Cartesian coordinates to define space. one could use the locations along a big ball of wool. It may not be so convenient but is would be just as effective. You're ball of wool is still 3 dimensional. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk Of course it is. I'm well aware of that. 8-) And a chess board is a lot of black squares on a white ground. But it is also a lot of white squares on a black ground. Can't you see that? You should really read those marvellous books on mathematics by W W Sawyer and let some fresh air into your stuffy three dimensional prison cell. ;-) Frank Frank (You're ball of wool - I deny it. g ) . Meanwhile back at the ranch, John Wayne was cleaning his pistola when it suddenly discharged flying from his hand and crashing into the mirror over the bar in Rosa's Cantina south of Laredo. While surprised the lead bullet fell in his lap, the bartender took advantage of the situation by pointing to the sign that stated you break my mirror, I break your head. while crushing the crease in John's hat with a bung starter. WW Sawyer, sitting across the room playing poker with a deck having 12 aces ( no mathematician ever uses the minimum number of anything) , was visible shaken to witness his math being confirmed that 3 x 4 = 12 and 4+3=7. However, his poker playing partner knew somebody was cheating at cards but couldn't prove it. Surely he stated , three is a crowd and I'm outa here. The local sherriff Dubya came thru the batwing doors backed up by FEMA blazing away with both shotgun barrels firing ,ending the discussion ,amused that people can perform wonders with numbers while eating cucumbers. What does all thius mean ? It means that while everybody was sipping tequila in the cantina, the US went broke last week and nobody's got the money to buy the next round of drinks no matter how many dimensions you wind up with, call it three if you must, but it ain't gonna matter. Richard
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
At 07:37 am 20/03/2006 -0600, Richard wrote: [snip} What does all this mean ? It means that while everybody was sipping tequila in the cantina, the US went broke last week and nobody's got the money to buy the next round of drinks no matter how many dimensions you wind up with, call it three if you must, but it ain't gonna matter. Richard Funny you should say that, Richard. There's a prophecy about the world going bankrupt. Looks as though it may be coming to pass, eh! Looks as though we are about to suffer that old Chinese curse and live in exciting times. 8-) Cheers, Frank
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
RC Macaulay wrote: - Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:38:17 -0600: Hi Richard, [snip] Howdy Robin, Simple explanations of physics are never as simple as viewed. The rings, like the favorite magic trick using loops, may actually each be shaped in the figure 8 .. plus in mobus form. Cutting one would provide the optical illusion of separating the remaining two, or even trickier, the mobus strip type rings are not connected but run in a track. When watching a magic show, one must consider what is seen doesn't I like the mobus strip idea. My understanding of strings is that they vibrate, so instead of a ring, they might be more like a cylinder. Except who's to say that the vibrations go in just two directions. I've always theorized that the nucleus is a toroid, and I can picture the three rings operating together to fill in the space of the toroid. necessarily mean you are seeing what is. All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a 3 dimensional universe. There's a nonsequitor if ever I head one. John E W Keeley believed that there were three subunits that made up the atom, Dale Pond created an excellent graphic showing three spheres dancing around one another, It can be seen at http://www.svpvril.com/astro.html#animatedtriplet --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
- Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 8:55 PM Subject: Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR? In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:38:17 -0600: Hi Richard, [snip] Howdy Robin, Simple explanations of physics are never as simple as viewed. The rings, like the favorite magic trick using loops, may actually each be shaped in the figure 8 .. plus in mobus form. Cutting one would provide the optical illusion of separating the remaining two, or even trickier, the mobus strip type rings are not connected but run in a track. When watching a magic show, one must consider what is seen doesn't necessarily mean you are seeing what is. All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a 3 dimensional universe. Howdy Robin, I agree that the number 3 represents three as I agree many in the Vorts group are the SPOTP. A 3 dimensional universe may be a stretch considering the universe is only an image of the real. Richard
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
-Original Message- From: RC Macaulay I agree that the number 3 represents three as I agree many in the Vorts group are the SPOTP. A 3 dimensional universe may be a stretch considering the universe is only an image of the real. Really, all that is needed is 2 dimensions. As in hologram, all the information needed to create the third dimension is contained in the two. Terry ___ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
At 11:10 am 19/03/2006 -0500, you wrote: -Original Message- From: RC Macaulay I agree that the number 3 represents three as I agree many in the Vorts group are the SPOTP. A 3 dimensional universe may be a stretch considering the universe is only an image of the real. Really, all that is needed is 2 dimensions. As in hologram, all the information needed to create the third dimension is contained in the two. Terry Or even one come to that - a string of ones and zeros. One doesn't have to use the three Cartesian coordinates to define space. one could use the locations along a big ball of wool. It may not be so convenient but is would be just as effective. In short, it all depends how you choose to look at things. I wish that there were four of them Then I could believe in more ov 'em. 8-) Frank
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
-Original Message- From: Grimer In short, it all depends how you choose to look at things. Innit da trut! Ackshully, the singularity contained all. Terry ___ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:25:11 -0600: Hi, [snip] Howdy Robin, I agree that the number 3 represents three as I agree many in the Vorts group are the SPOTP. A 3 dimensional universe may be a stretch considering the universe is only an image of the real. Richard ..but then so is everything in it, thus bound by the same rules. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 11:10:07 -0500: Hi, [snip] Really, all that is needed is 2 dimensions. As in hologram, all the information needed to create the third dimension is contained in the two. Terry A Hologram does not contain all the information of a 3 D object. You still can't see the back of it, and even if you could, you're still only looking at the surface. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to Grimer's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:46:28 +: Hi, [snip] Or even one come to that - a string of ones and zeros. One doesn't have to use the three Cartesian coordinates to define space. one could use the locations along a big ball of wool. It may not be so convenient but is would be just as effective. You're ball of wool is still 3 dimensional. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
Howdy Robin, Simple explanations of physics are never as simple as viewed. The rings, like the favorite magic trick using loops, may actually each be shaped in the figure 8 .. plus in mobus form. Cutting one would provide the optical illusion of separating the remaining two, or even trickier, the mobus strip type rings are not connected but run in a track. When watching a magic show, one must consider what is seen doesn't necessarily mean you are seeing what is. Richard - Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 12:16 AM Subject: Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR? In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:10:01 -0800: Hi, [snip] This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is something magic about this number of three. [snip] There's nothing magic about it, it's a direct consequence of living in a 3 dimensional universe. Point objects have 3 degrees of freedom. The rings demonstrate that beautifully. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:38:17 -0600: Hi Richard, [snip] Howdy Robin, Simple explanations of physics are never as simple as viewed. The rings, like the favorite magic trick using loops, may actually each be shaped in the figure 8 .. plus in mobus form. Cutting one would provide the optical illusion of separating the remaining two, or even trickier, the mobus strip type rings are not connected but run in a track. When watching a magic show, one must consider what is seen doesn't necessarily mean you are seeing what is. All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a 3 dimensional universe. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
Frank, This structure has the property that no two rings are interlocking, therefore if any one of the rings is removed, then all three separate. That would indicate temporary stability... I was trying to visualize it with three proper rings and I couldn't. I now see why. It's cos they are not proper rings at all. Still, to be fair you did first call them structures. 8-) By proper you must mean identical circular rings ... then no, that won't work wihtout intersection (magician's rings) ... plus, there are many images on the google page which are not true Borromean rings. OTOH do not need to go to the paper clip degree of elongation either. This image is interesting in the context of three-axis spin: http://sro.theory.org/my_rings.glenna.jpg but these rings are elongated. Nor necessary for the nuclear variety. When the ring itself is sinusoidal as it must be if each item is represented as a waveform, then all three of then can *intertsect* and enst in each others pathway - and then of course they are relatively circular, and of the same size. Plus if each ring is composed of 137 full sine waves which - is obviously not divisible by two for perfect stability, then you must have that lissajous offset of 1/137 (at least) in every dynamic revloution. The Borromena wave structure is only stable as a dynamic structure. I suspect that on some level of understanding - that relates to the more basic question of why the alpha constant is not really e'xactly 1/137' but has that small overage - which is of course due to the fact that it cannot be measured on a true plane - and the overage is most likely due to either the dynamic offset itself, or the cuvature of space. It gets curiouser and curiouser Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English). Now I'm opening out like the largest telescope that ever was!... ... which was quite a good-bye feat, Jones
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
Jones. You picked up on the 137 contact points of (Crotalus cerastes Particlaes) didn't you? :-) Particle Wavelength Lambda = hc/E = circumference of frictionless jar. containing said snake Frequency f = c/lambda = 1.23e20 Hz for electron or positron. Displacement current I = q*f =19.68 amperes q = C*V = (eo*lambda = 2.155e-23 farad) * V = 1.6e-19 coulombs V= (E/0.5*2.155e-23)^1/2 = 8.7e4 Volts But I = V/Zo (Zo = 377 ohms) = 230.7 amperes and 230.7/19.68 = 11.726 = (137.03)^1/2. ??? Fred http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~brm2286/locomotn.htm Sidewinding is used by many snakes crawling on smooth or slippery surfaces, but is best known in the sidewinder rattlesnake (Crotalus cerastes) and a few desert vipers of Africa and Asia. Sidewinding is similar to lateral undulation in the pattern of bending, but differs in three critical ways: First, each point along the body is sequentially placed in static (rather than sliding) friction with the substrate. Second, segments of the body are lifted off the ground between the regions in static contact with the ground. Thus, the body sort of rolls along the ground from neck to tail, forming a characteristic track (that is proportional to body length) in sand; after being lifted off the ground and set down again a short distance away, the front part of the body begins a new track while the rear part of the body completes the old track. Third, because of the static contact and lifting of the body, the snake travels roughly diagonally relative to the tracks it forms on the ground. Muscle activity during sidewinding is similar to that in lateral undulation except that some muscles are also active bilaterally in the regions of trunk lifting. Jones Sidewinder Beene wrote. Frank, This structure has the property that no two rings are interlocking, therefore if any one of the rings is removed, then all three separate. That would indicate temporary stability... I was trying to visualize it with three proper rings and I couldn't. I now see why. It's cos they are not proper rings at all. Still, to be fair you did first call them structures. 8-) By proper you must mean identical circular rings ... then no, that won't work wihtout intersection (magician's rings) ... plus, there are many images on the google page which are not true Borromean rings. OTOH do not need to go to the paper clip degree of elongation either. This image is interesting in the context of three-axis spin: http://sro.theory.org/my_rings.glenna.jpg but these rings are elongated. Nor necessary for the nuclear variety. When the ring itself is sinusoidal as it must be if each item is represented as a waveform, then all three of then can *intertsect* and enst in each others pathway - and then of course they are relatively circular, and of the same size. Plus if each ring is composed of 137 full sine waves which - is obviously not divisible by two for perfect stability, then you must have that lissajous offset of 1/137 (at least) in every dynamic revloution. The Borromena wave structure is only stable as a dynamic structure. I suspect that on some level of understanding - that relates to the more basic question of why the alpha constant is not really e'xactly 1/137' but has that small overage - which is of course due to the fact that it cannot be measured on a true plane - and the overage is most likely due to either the dynamic offset itself, or the cuvature of space. It gets curiouser and curiouser Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English). Now I'm opening out like the largest telescope that ever was!... ... which was quite a good-bye feat, Jones
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:10:01 -0800: Hi, [snip] This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is something magic about this number of three. [snip] There's nothing magic about it, it's a direct consequence of living in a 3 dimensional universe. Point objects have 3 degrees of freedom. The rings demonstrate that beautifully. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
At 10:16 pm 15/03/2006 -0900, Horace wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060315174950.htm This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is something magic about this number of three. If you can create this kind of state out of any other type of particle, it'll have exactly the same behavior, Chin said. The article also goes on to say, = Today, nanotechnology researchers can combine atoms in novel ways to form materials with interesting new properties, but you are not changing the fundamental interactions of these atoms, Chin said. That can only be done at temperatures near absolute zero. At the moment, I don't see how this can be done at much higher temperatures, he said. I can. 8-) Lowering the temperature is increasing the Compreture pressure. Lowering the Beta-atmosphere pressure by the 12th power three dimensional Casimir action will be the equivalent of increasing Compreture. This is a cryogenic state, but one has to wonder about the possibility of a similar state existing in a lattice for a sufficient time to produce multi-nuclear LENR. One need wonder no longer. 8-) This is how Cold Fusion works as I explained in the Infinite Energy magazine article. Lowering temperature is increasing the numerator. Lowering Beta-atmosphere pressure is decreasing the denominator. Curiously enough, it literally is Cold Fusion - bloody cold - or the Beta-atmosphere equivalent of bloody cold to be exact. Cheers, Frank
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
Howdy Frank, Which is also an excellent theoretical description of the principle of the Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube. Richard - Original Message - From: Grimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:21 AM Subject: Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR? At 10:16 pm 15/03/2006 -0900, Horace wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060315174950.htm This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is something magic about this number of three. If you can create this kind of state out of any other type of particle, it'll have exactly the same behavior, Chin said. The article also goes on to say, = Today, nanotechnology researchers can combine atoms in novel ways to form materials with interesting new properties, but you are not changing the fundamental interactions of these atoms, Chin said. That can only be done at temperatures near absolute zero. At the moment, I don't see how this can be done at much higher temperatures, he said. I can. 8-) Lowering the temperature is increasing the Compreture pressure. Lowering the Beta-atmosphere pressure by the 12th power three dimensional Casimir action will be the equivalent of increasing Compreture. This is a cryogenic state, but one has to wonder about the possibility of a similar state existing in a lattice for a sufficient time to produce multi-nuclear LENR. One need wonder no longer. 8-) This is how Cold Fusion works as I explained in the Infinite Energy magazine article. Lowering temperature is increasing the numerator. Lowering Beta-atmosphere pressure is decreasing the denominator. Curiously enough, it literally is Cold Fusion - bloody cold - or the Beta-atmosphere equivalent of bloody cold to be exact. Cheers, Frank
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
At 07:47 am 16/03/2006 -0600, you wrote: Howdy Frank, Which is also an excellent theoretical description of the principle of the Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube. Richard I see what you mean. You got there before I did. But with all your very tangible experience of such phenomena - that is only to be expected.8-) Frank
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is something magic about this number of three. Ha! In a number of past posts I have tried to wax poetic on the subject of triad Form, and in particular the so-called Borromean structures (three interlocking rings) which are fascinating in the context of nuclear theory. http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040529/fob7.asp ... but I was not aware of the so-callaed Efimov strucutre Are they related? you bet your fur they are, mother nature. Just after the turn of the century, D'Arcy Thompson wrote a seminal book about the subject of form called simply enough, On Growth and Form. For way too long, I have been enchanted by his major theme that platonic ideals - as 'form' - tend to repeat on different geometric scales, up and down. This suggests that there is a two-way mirrored self-symmetry of the kind made famous by Fractal images, and which seems to be involved in nature's way of generating form. Then there is string theory (Fred's favorite subject) ... where the strings are best visualized as loops (the snake eating his tail) which have the suspected appearance of a stack of three rings, the center being counter-spin to the other two - but with an aligned axis of the three. It is also possible to have an alternative kind of stack of three rings where the center ring is orthogonal to the other two - that is almost the Borromean model, which is not exactly the three-interlocking-ring model. The Olympics icon has each ring tilted and potentially orthogonal, like links in a chain... but there is an alternative kind stack but with interlocking wave-functions. The so-called Borromean Ring is visually this different kind of triad interlocking ring-form - which commonly adorned Viking art and Renaissance architecture. This structure has the property that no two rings are interlocking, therefore if any one of the rings is removed, then all three separate. That would indicate temporary stability... It gets curiouser and curiouser Jones
Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
At 09:10 am 16/03/2006 -0800, Jones wrote: This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is something magic about this number of three. Ha! In a number of past posts I have tried to wax poetic on the subject of triad Form, and in particular the so-called Borromean structures (three interlocking rings) which are fascinating in the context of nuclear theory. http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040529/fob7.asp ... but I was not aware of the so-called Efimov structure Are they related? you bet your fur they are, mother nature. Mmm... Interesting stuff Jones. And now that I have looked up Borremean rings on google images I can proudly say that this is one of your passions that I really understand. I was trying to visualize it with three proper rings and I couldn't. I now see why. It's cos they are not proper rings at all. Still, to be fair you did first call them structures. 8-) ...The so-called Borromean Ring is visually this different kind of triad interlocking ring-form - which commonly adorned Viking art and Renaissance architecture. This structure has the property that no two rings are interlocking, therefore if any one of the rings is removed, then all three separate. That would indicate temporary stability... It gets curiouser and curiouser Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English). Now Im opening out like the largest telescope that ever was!... http://www.ruthannzaroff.com/wonderland/curiouser.htm
Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060315174950.htm This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is something magic about this number of three. If you can create this kind of state out of any other type of particle, it'll have exactly the same behavior, Chin said. This is a cryogenic state, but one has to wonder about the possibility of a similar state existing in a lattice for a sufficient time to produce multi-nuclear LENR. Horace Heffner
