Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from StationtoCruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Butch Evans
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 18:26 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: 
> I'd imagine IPSEC would solve that.  I haven't looked at it, though.

IPSEC would work, but it's a pain to do IPSEC when you're mobile,
especially with Mikrotik.  OpenVPN offers the same level of encryption
and works very well with mobile devices.

-- 

* Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
* http://www.wispa.org/ * Wired or Wireless Networks   *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station to Cruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Butch Evans
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 14:59 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: 
> So in your described system, does it just use a single VPN link or multiple?

In all of the ones I've deployed, just a single vpn connection was
sufficent.

> I was thinking of your system before this thread came up and I was thinking 
> of each connection having its own VPN back and using OSPF to handle link 
> failures back home with each router having a loopback address everyone talks 
> to.

This would work, too, although I think it is overkill.  Using a sequence
of events like:

1. we are connected via radio1 with a vpn originating from radio1
2. We "notice" low signal levels on radio1, toggle off the vpn, remove
the IPs from radio1 (if needed) and switch to radio2 as our active
radio 
3. Set up appropriate IPs on radio2 and toggle the vpn tunnel on

That sequence is not even going to take 1/2 second if you already have
the radio connection on radio2.  It would be unlikely to even drop a
ping and more than likely, even a voip call would only "hiccup" instead
of dropping.

> I haven't done anything with any of these, so maybe I'm trying to solve a 
> problem that doesn't exist in your system.

Not sure what you are trying to solve.  I don't bother with the multiple
tunnels, although it is certainly a possibility.  Depending on the depth
of the tests you run in your script, it could make the script(s) more or
less complex, as you let OSPF worry about link viability.


-- 

* Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
* http://www.wispa.org/ * Wired or Wireless Networks   *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

2009-10-18 Thread Travis Johnson




Hi,

Because you have direct experience, I'm curious if you could share what
is different in their lives because they have a 100Mbps connection?
What can they do on that connection that they can't do on a 1Mbps
connection? How has it changed their lives?

Travis
Microserv

e...@wisp-router.com wrote:

  You can get 6mbit mobile broadband sometimes as a "perk" for getting a permanent connection in your apartment/house.
My parents had a 26Mbit down DSL connection out in the sticks (5miles from closest bus stop and grocery store) before they moved to a city (35min away and closest city within an hours drive of a 55k population, celebrated 800 years about 5 yrs ago) and now have a 100Mbit connection. 

/Eje 
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "Mike Hammett" 
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:07:45 
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

100 meg is quite prevalent in Scandinavia and 1 gig is spreading.  A 1 meg 
guarantee isn't much of anything there.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Robert West" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:46 PM
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

  
  
I can see somewhere in the near future, after all major technologies
converge into devices that run on whatever version of the "internet" we 
will
have at that time, that this would be a feasible argument however at this
moment and probably in the next 10 years the vast majority of us will be
able to live and survive perfectly fine with no internet.

I don't understand the 1mg limit for the human right.  Most information,
other than video, can be had at mere dial up speed.  How would slower
internet speeds be the difference between life or death?

My 15 year old.

"Dad!  If I can't see the Whack-a-kitty video on YouTube I'm just gonna
die!"

Okay, that much I DO understand.

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David Hulsebus
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

FYI

>From SANS Newsbites Vol. 11 Num. 82 : Broadband Internet Access Deemed
a Legal Right

--Finland Declares 1Mb Broadband Access a Legal Right
(October 14 & 15, 2009)
The Finnish government has enacted a law making 1Mb broadband Internet
access a legal right.  The law will take effect in July 2010.  The
country may eventually guarantee its citizens the right to 100Mb
broadband connections.  Finland's Transport and Communications Ministry
spokesperson Laura Vikkonen was quoted as saying that "We think [the
Internet is] something you cannot live without in modern society.  Like
banking services or water or electricity, you need an Internet
connection."  Earlier this year, France declared Internet access to be
a human right.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10374831-2.html
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2009/10/15/finland-m
akes-broadband-internet-a-legal-right.aspx



Dave Hulsebus
Portative Technologies, LLC
www.portative.com





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---

Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

2009-10-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Eje - where is this?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:41 PM,  wrote:

> You can get 6mbit mobile broadband sometimes as a "perk" for getting a
> permanent connection in your apartment/house.
> My parents had a 26Mbit down DSL connection out in the sticks (5miles from
> closest bus stop and grocery store) before they moved to a city (35min away
> and closest city within an hours drive of a 55k population, celebrated 800
> years about 5 yrs ago) and now have a 100Mbit connection.
>
> /Eje
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Mike Hammett" 
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:07:45
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>
> 100 meg is quite prevalent in Scandinavia and 1 gig is spreading.  A 1 meg
> guarantee isn't much of anything there.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Robert West" 
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:46 PM
> To: "'WISPA General List'" 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>
> > I can see somewhere in the near future, after all major technologies
> > converge into devices that run on whatever version of the "internet" we
> > will
> > have at that time, that this would be a feasible argument however at this
> > moment and probably in the next 10 years the vast majority of us will be
> > able to live and survive perfectly fine with no internet.
> >
> > I don't understand the 1mg limit for the human right.  Most information,
> > other than video, can be had at mere dial up speed.  How would slower
> > internet speeds be the difference between life or death?
> >
> > My 15 year old.
> >
> > "Dad!  If I can't see the Whack-a-kitty video on YouTube I'm just gonna
> > die!"
> >
> > Okay, that much I DO understand.
> >
> > Bob-
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> > Behalf Of David Hulsebus
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:44 PM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
> >
> > FYI
> >
> > From SANS Newsbites Vol. 11 Num. 82 : Broadband Internet Access Deemed
> > a Legal Right
> >
> > --Finland Declares 1Mb Broadband Access a Legal Right
> > (October 14 & 15, 2009)
> > The Finnish government has enacted a law making 1Mb broadband Internet
> > access a legal right.  The law will take effect in July 2010.  The
> > country may eventually guarantee its citizens the right to 100Mb
> > broadband connections.  Finland's Transport and Communications Ministry
> > spokesperson Laura Vikkonen was quoted as saying that "We think [the
> > Internet is] something you cannot live without in modern society.  Like
> > banking services or water or electricity, you need an Internet
> > connection."  Earlier this year, France declared Internet access to be
> > a human right.
> > http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10374831-2.html
> >
> http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2009/10/15/finland-m
> > akes-broadband-internet-a-legal-right.aspx
> >
> >
> >
> > Dave Hulsebus
> > Portative Technologies, LLC
> > www.portative.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> > 
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> 
> > 
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> 
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> -

Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

2009-10-18 Thread eje
You can get 6mbit mobile broadband sometimes as a "perk" for getting a 
permanent connection in your apartment/house.
My parents had a 26Mbit down DSL connection out in the sticks (5miles from 
closest bus stop and grocery store) before they moved to a city (35min away and 
closest city within an hours drive of a 55k population, celebrated 800 years 
about 5 yrs ago) and now have a 100Mbit connection. 

/Eje 
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "Mike Hammett" 
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:07:45 
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

100 meg is quite prevalent in Scandinavia and 1 gig is spreading.  A 1 meg 
guarantee isn't much of anything there.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Robert West" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:46 PM
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

> I can see somewhere in the near future, after all major technologies
> converge into devices that run on whatever version of the "internet" we 
> will
> have at that time, that this would be a feasible argument however at this
> moment and probably in the next 10 years the vast majority of us will be
> able to live and survive perfectly fine with no internet.
>
> I don't understand the 1mg limit for the human right.  Most information,
> other than video, can be had at mere dial up speed.  How would slower
> internet speeds be the difference between life or death?
>
> My 15 year old.
>
> "Dad!  If I can't see the Whack-a-kitty video on YouTube I'm just gonna
> die!"
>
> Okay, that much I DO understand.
>
> Bob-
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of David Hulsebus
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:44 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>
> FYI
>
> From SANS Newsbites Vol. 11 Num. 82 : Broadband Internet Access Deemed
> a Legal Right
>
> --Finland Declares 1Mb Broadband Access a Legal Right
> (October 14 & 15, 2009)
> The Finnish government has enacted a law making 1Mb broadband Internet
> access a legal right.  The law will take effect in July 2010.  The
> country may eventually guarantee its citizens the right to 100Mb
> broadband connections.  Finland's Transport and Communications Ministry
> spokesperson Laura Vikkonen was quoted as saying that "We think [the
> Internet is] something you cannot live without in modern society.  Like
> banking services or water or electricity, you need an Internet
> connection."  Earlier this year, France declared Internet access to be
> a human right.
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10374831-2.html
> http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2009/10/15/finland-m
> akes-broadband-internet-a-legal-right.aspx
>
>
>
> Dave Hulsebus
> Portative Technologies, LLC
> www.portative.com
>
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station to Cruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Mike Hammett
So in your described system, does it just use a single VPN link or multiple?

I was thinking of your system before this thread came up and I was thinking 
of each connection having its own VPN back and using OSPF to handle link 
failures back home with each router having a loopback address everyone talks 
to.

I haven't done anything with any of these, so maybe I'm trying to solve a 
problem that doesn't exist in your system.

I'm looking to attempt to setup something similar, perhaps just as a tech 
demo, but maybe actually use it for something.

Prefer the wireless links, but have a 3G card as backup.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Butch Evans" 
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 11:56 AM
To: "WISPA General List" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station 
to Cruiser

> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 11:05 -0400, Robert West wrote:
>> I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little 
>> spot
>> in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to 
>> the
>> station network via a wireless link.
>
> I have done this several times.  See this blog entry for some basic
> details on HOW to accomplish it.
> http://tinyurl.com/3w74jg
>
> I am happy to assist with such a network.
>
> -- 
> 
> * Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
> * http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
> * http://www.wispa.org/ * Wired or Wireless Networks   *
> * http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *
> 
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

2009-10-18 Thread Mike Hammett
100 meg is quite prevalent in Scandinavia and 1 gig is spreading.  A 1 meg 
guarantee isn't much of anything there.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Robert West" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:46 PM
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

> I can see somewhere in the near future, after all major technologies
> converge into devices that run on whatever version of the "internet" we 
> will
> have at that time, that this would be a feasible argument however at this
> moment and probably in the next 10 years the vast majority of us will be
> able to live and survive perfectly fine with no internet.
>
> I don't understand the 1mg limit for the human right.  Most information,
> other than video, can be had at mere dial up speed.  How would slower
> internet speeds be the difference between life or death?
>
> My 15 year old.
>
> "Dad!  If I can't see the Whack-a-kitty video on YouTube I'm just gonna
> die!"
>
> Okay, that much I DO understand.
>
> Bob-
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of David Hulsebus
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:44 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>
> FYI
>
> From SANS Newsbites Vol. 11 Num. 82 : Broadband Internet Access Deemed
> a Legal Right
>
> --Finland Declares 1Mb Broadband Access a Legal Right
> (October 14 & 15, 2009)
> The Finnish government has enacted a law making 1Mb broadband Internet
> access a legal right.  The law will take effect in July 2010.  The
> country may eventually guarantee its citizens the right to 100Mb
> broadband connections.  Finland's Transport and Communications Ministry
> spokesperson Laura Vikkonen was quoted as saying that "We think [the
> Internet is] something you cannot live without in modern society.  Like
> banking services or water or electricity, you need an Internet
> connection."  Earlier this year, France declared Internet access to be
> a human right.
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10374831-2.html
> http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2009/10/15/finland-m
> akes-broadband-internet-a-legal-right.aspx
>
>
>
> Dave Hulsebus
> Portative Technologies, LLC
> www.portative.com
>
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto Cruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Mike Hammett
If you can find it.  ;-)


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Josh Luthman" 
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:45 PM
To: "WISPA General List" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto 
Cruiser

> I strongly advise avoiding AT&T's 3G service.  I haven't been impressed at
> all.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
> improbable, must be the truth."
> --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jayson Baker 
> wrote:
>
>> We currently do this for a local PD.  They have 13 of those ruggedized 
>> Dell
>> laptops, mounted in all the cars.
>> We looked at 2.4GHz and 900MHz.  Even though the town is only 5sqmi, we
>> decided to go with Verizon Aircards.
>>
>> Worked out well, because the laptops are tied directly into their CAD
>> system, which is tied into the whole state.
>> So now they could, theoretically, go anywhere in the state and be
>> dispatched
>> on a call, run plates/people through NCIC, etc.
>>
>> I believe that because of that, they actually got the state to pay for a
>> lot
>> of it.
>>
>> Sure, we don't make anything on the Verizon service, but we do on the
>> backend by tying their CAD into the Internet.
>>
>> Just something to keep in mind, if you have any sort of 3G service in 
>> that
>> area.
>>
>> Jayson
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Robert West > >wrote:
>>
>> > I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little
>> spot
>> > in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to
>> the
>> > station network via a wireless link.  (He is the "Police Chief" but I
>> > suspect he is also the entire police force)  He said that the local
>> > Wal-Mart
>> > has agreed to donate to him a few of those little Acer 7" screen 
>> > laptops,
>> > which are a big piece of crap from the number of repairs we've had to 
>> > do
>> on
>> > them...  Anyhow, he wants to be able to be in the cruiser and connect 
>> > to
>> > the
>> > network back at the station and use the websites from the Attorney
>> > General's
>> > office where he can run plates, drivers license info and also fill out
>> his
>> > reports.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Here's the setup..
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This Burg is a bit less than 2 miles long and about one and a half 
>> > miles
>> > wide.  The town hall is equivalent to a 4 story building and they also
>> have
>> > a water tower that looks to be 100 foot tall.  The terrain is flat as 
>> > can
>> > be
>> > and they have the normal scattering of trees.  The Town Hall and water
>> > tower
>> > are the tallest structures by far aside from a large grain elevator 
>> > right
>> > outside of town.  Boy wants to connect to his network anywhere in town
>> from
>> > his cop-mobile as well as when he is at home, also within the town.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > We've done plenty of private networks but it's all been in the 2.4 and
>> 5ghz
>> > band.  He was thinking he could just throw up a 2.4ghz link and be good
>> but
>> > I told him to hold on, I didn't think he could broadcast the Attorney
>> > Generals network to every antenna in town, I had to do some research. 
>> > So
>> > this, because of my utterly blatant laziness, is my research. J
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Has anyone been down this path?  What can we do and not do?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I have a meeting with the guy next Wednesday and want to have some idea
>> of
>> > what we're up against on this one.  (Hopefully he doesn't recognize me 
>> > as
>> > the guy who took him to court over a ticket he wrote for a crooked
>> license
>> > plate...  I won that one by the way)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for any help!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Robert West
>> >
>> > Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
>> >
>> > 740-335-7020
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> > http://signup.wispa.org/
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> >
>> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> >
>> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!

Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from StationtoCruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Mike Hammett
I'd imagine IPSEC would solve that.  I haven't looked at it, though.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: 
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:48 PM
To: "WISPA General List" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from 
StationtoCruiser

> Be careful of the new federal encryption requirements for anything hooked 
> up to the National Crime Computers.
>
> A lot of states have new rules also when interfacing to the state DMV and 
> crime networks
>
> Just FYI
>
> -B-
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jayson Baker 
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:37:26
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station
> to Cruiser
>
> We currently do this for a local PD.  They have 13 of those ruggedized 
> Dell
> laptops, mounted in all the cars.
> We looked at 2.4GHz and 900MHz.  Even though the town is only 5sqmi, we
> decided to go with Verizon Aircards.
>
> Worked out well, because the laptops are tied directly into their CAD
> system, which is tied into the whole state.
> So now they could, theoretically, go anywhere in the state and be 
> dispatched
> on a call, run plates/people through NCIC, etc.
>
> I believe that because of that, they actually got the state to pay for a 
> lot
> of it.
>
> Sure, we don't make anything on the Verizon service, but we do on the
> backend by tying their CAD into the Internet.
>
> Just something to keep in mind, if you have any sort of 3G service in that
> area.
>
> Jayson
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Robert West 
> wrote:
>
>> I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little 
>> spot
>> in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to 
>> the
>> station network via a wireless link.  (He is the "Police Chief" but I
>> suspect he is also the entire police force)  He said that the local
>> Wal-Mart
>> has agreed to donate to him a few of those little Acer 7" screen laptops,
>> which are a big piece of crap from the number of repairs we've had to do 
>> on
>> them...  Anyhow, he wants to be able to be in the cruiser and connect to
>> the
>> network back at the station and use the websites from the Attorney
>> General's
>> office where he can run plates, drivers license info and also fill out 
>> his
>> reports.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the setup..
>>
>>
>>
>> This Burg is a bit less than 2 miles long and about one and a half miles
>> wide.  The town hall is equivalent to a 4 story building and they also 
>> have
>> a water tower that looks to be 100 foot tall.  The terrain is flat as can
>> be
>> and they have the normal scattering of trees.  The Town Hall and water
>> tower
>> are the tallest structures by far aside from a large grain elevator right
>> outside of town.  Boy wants to connect to his network anywhere in town 
>> from
>> his cop-mobile as well as when he is at home, also within the town.
>>
>>
>>
>> We've done plenty of private networks but it's all been in the 2.4 and 
>> 5ghz
>> band.  He was thinking he could just throw up a 2.4ghz link and be good 
>> but
>> I told him to hold on, I didn't think he could broadcast the Attorney
>> Generals network to every antenna in town, I had to do some research.  So
>> this, because of my utterly blatant laziness, is my research. J
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone been down this path?  What can we do and not do?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a meeting with the guy next Wednesday and want to have some idea 
>> of
>> what we're up against on this one.  (Hopefully he doesn't recognize me as
>> the guy who took him to court over a ticket he wrote for a crooked 
>> license
>> plate...  I won that one by the way)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert West
>>
>> Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
>>
>> 740-335-7020
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: 

Re: [WISPA] sub 3.7 gig spectrum, comments needed was -- Re: [FCC Committee] FCC ChairmanJulius Genachowski AnnouncesSeniorStaff for Development ofNational Broadband Plan

2009-10-18 Thread Mike Hammett
Can they even do anything without someone requesting it?  Can't get it if 
you don't ask for it.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Robert West" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:15 AM
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] sub 3.7 gig spectrum,comments needed was -- Re: [FCC 
Committee] FCC ChairmanJulius   Genachowski AnnouncesSeniorStaff for 
Development ofNational  Broadband Plan

> What?!  Pagers are long gone???  Well that figures..  I was
> wondering why my pager hasn't gone off since 1997.  And I've been paying 
> the
> bill every month.  DAMN!
>
> The fire department here just put in a 2.5ghz system last month.  Fire 
> radio
> guy tells me they have been picking up signals in that band but it's
> supposed to be clear around here..  They are "looking into it".
> Someone is cheating and it's not me.  I hope it turns out to be some 13 
> year
> old kid in his parents basement.  I'll give him a job.
>
>
> I agree that they should look at spectrum that has been allocated for
> outdated applications.  I'm sure someone at the FCC is already but they 
> need
> pushed to do anything about it.
>
> Just rambling cause it's raining.  Again.
>
> Bob-
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 10:00 AM
> To: fcccommit...@wispa.org
> Cc: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] sub 3.7 gig spectrum, comments needed was -- Re: [FCC
> Committee] FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski AnnouncesSeniorStaff for
> Development of National Broadband Plan
>
> Hmmm, I thought that there was one with something like 100 questions on 
> it.
> I must have my issues mixed up.
>
> Anyway here's an idea that I think is worth of discussion.
>
> I think we should toss out the idea that sensing mechanisms should be
> allowed so that ANY open frequencies can be used.
>
> A couple of easy examples would be 2.5 ghz bands.  Those are NOT used in
> large parts of the country.  Today's wifi chips will go up to those
> frequencies with a firmware change!  Wifi already has a listen before
> talking mechanism.  It shouldn't be impossible to add a little bit of
> intelligence and coordination to the mechanism and allow a nearly free
> expansion of the 2.4 gig wifi band.
>
> The same could be said for 900mhz.  Most of what's on either side of it is
> paging systems.  Yet many paging systems are long gone now, especially in
> rural areas.  Why not open up the bands on an as available basis?
>
> If we can convince the FCC to allow these types of mechanism we could have 
> a
>
> unlicensed underlay that gives us a LOT more spectrum!
>
> Thoughts?
> marlon
>
> P.S.  I'm tossing this idea back out on the public list for some more
> discussion relating to this idea.  It's a major policy change (for the 
> fcc)
> so I'd like to hear people's thoughts on asking for it.
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Stephen Coran" 
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [FCC Committee] FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski
> AnnouncesSeniorStaff for Development of National Broadband Plan
>
>
>> Here is a link to the Public Notice inviting comments:
>> http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2100A1.pdf
>>
>> Jack Unger and I are developing an outline of WISPA's Comments based on
>> the Committee members' e-mails and our own thoughts.  Deadline for
>> Comments is next Friday.
>>
>> Stephen E. Coran
>> Rini Coran, PC
>> 1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600
>> Washington, D.C. 20036
>> 202.463.4310 - voice
>> 202.669.3288 - cell
>> 202.296.2014 - fax
>> sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail
>> www.rinicoran.com
>> www.telecommunicationslaw.com
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
>> and may be protected by legal privilege.  If you are not the intended
>> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use
>> of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited.  If you have received
>> this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to
>> the sender and deleting or destroying the e-mail and any attachments
>> without retaining any copies.  Thank you for your cooperation.
>>
>>
>>
>> IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements
>> imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in
>> this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or
>> written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
>> penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing
>> or recommending to another party any matter addressed herein.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: fcccommittee-boun...@wispa.org
>> [mailto:fcccommittee-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 11:29 PM
>> To: fcccommit...@wisp

Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy....

2009-10-18 Thread Mike
Yabut, a dish "concentrates the  forward radiation."  So does a 
panel, a slot antenna, and many others.  I just wondered why you 
thought a Yagi solved your problem.  A 2.4G yagi has large diameter 
elements compared to wavelength, not like the old VHF Yagi's, but are 
prone to icing in the winter up north.  What magic did you find in 
the Yagi?  Just curious.

"Lucy, you got some 'splainin' to do!" Ricky Ricardo




At 09:31 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>Because yagi antenna concentrates the forward radiation and response. -Lucy :)
>
>On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Mike  wrote:
> > Rick:
> >
> > Why did it solve the problem? Better side lobe attenuation?  'Splain Lucy.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > At 08:42 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
> >>I fixed a nasty multipath issue for one of my subs by using a yagi.
> >>Here are some good sources for info:
> >>http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1121691
> >>www.crystalcomltd.com/...whitepapers/124102032509Berkeley_Multipath.pdf
> >>http://www.rfengineer.net/1171/rf-basics-multipath/
> >>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note 
> 09186a008019f646.shtml
> >>-RickG
> >>
> >>On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
> >> wrote:
> >> > I don't Steve.
> >> >
> >> > But think of it like an echo.  You get that first, clear 
> signal coming in,
> >> > laser straight.  Then at some point shortly after that you start
> >> getting the
> >> > reflections.  If there are too many of them, and/or they are 
> at the wrong
> >> > time the radio will get confused.
> >> >
> >> > G SHOULD handle this better than B.  It's made to use 
> multipath's echoes to
> >> > reassemble a complete message.  Sometimes it works that way, 
> sometimes it
> >> > doesn't.
> >> >
> >> > I'd have to say, for me, g is usually better with multipath 
> than b though.
> >> > B handles interference better.  At least that's what I'm 
> seeing.  I have a
> >> > tower that was giving 1 meg down 2 to 3 up, almost all customers
> >> saw that or
> >> > worse.  Swapped back to b mode only and it's now a consistent 
> 4 megs both
> >> > ways.
> >> >
> >> > Another thing to try is to turn down the power.  Probably on 
> both ends.  If
> >> > you are at -69 see if you can drop your ap by 5 then 5 more 
> db.  Make sure
> >> > to drop the cpe by the same amount.  What you are trying to do 
> is move the
> >> > echo down so far that it can't be "heard".
> >> >
> >> > I've also had installs that are happiest about 2' above the ground!
> >> >
> >> > Here's a fun one for you.  I've got one customer that shoots 
> near a grain
> >> > elevator.  Most of the year he works fine, but near harvest,
> >> every year, his
> >> > performance goes out the window.  It seems that the wheat in the
> >> elevator is
> >> > moved out and the empty elevator is worse than the full one.
> >> >
> >> > Out here we have VERY long links.  I have one at 18
> >> miles.  PTMP.  Yet there
> >> > are also customers within 1 mile.  10 to 15 mile links are common place.
> >> > Multipath is a real head ache as the ground conditions 
> change.  Customer's
> >> > service will be perfect, until it snows.  Or until they 
> harvest a field, or
> >> > the ground dries out, or it rains etc.
> >> >
> >> > Fortunately MOST of the time this isn't an issue.  But when it 
> does hit ya,
> >> > it can be very hard to figure out.
> >> >
> >> > One other thing you might want to try with your customer, turn 
> the radio to
> >> > the wrong polarity.  You are very close to the tower so you should still
> >> > have enough signal.  I've not had to do this very often, but 
> it's a little
> >> > trick that has worked before.  I've also pointed them 180* the
> >> wrong way and
> >> > had that work very well, especially with a grid.
> >> >
> >> > Let us know if anything helps.
> >> > marlon
> >> >
> >> > - Original Message -
> >> > From: "Steve Barnes" 
> >> > To: "WISPA General List" 
> >> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:07 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Marlon, DO you have or know of a good white paper on 
> Multipath issues?  I
> >> >> agree with your assessment but I have several locations that I have not
> >> >> been able to resolve Multipath for.  I had an installation last week 3
> >> >> miles from tower AP.  Clear line of site other than going over the
> >> >> Neighbors Metal barn and between 4 metal grain bins. We could 
> get a -69 On
> >> >> 50% of the property but retries were 98% No matter where we 
> tried High-Low
> >> >> left right. 100 yards either way on the road and <10% retries and a -65
> >> >> signal.  I just need to some documentation to solidify my 
> understanding.
> >> >>
> >> >> Steve Barnes
> >> >> Manager
> >> >> PCS-WIN
> >> >> RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
> >> >>
> >> >> Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through 
> experience
> >> >> of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared,
> >> >> ambition i

Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy....

2009-10-18 Thread RickG
Because yagi antenna concentrates the forward radiation and response. -Lucy :)

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Mike  wrote:
> Rick:
>
> Why did it solve the problem? Better side lobe attenuation?  'Splain Lucy.
>
> Mike
>
> At 08:42 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>>I fixed a nasty multipath issue for one of my subs by using a yagi.
>>Here are some good sources for info:
>>http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1121691
>>www.crystalcomltd.com/...whitepapers/124102032509Berkeley_Multipath.pdf
>>http://www.rfengineer.net/1171/rf-basics-multipath/
>>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a008019f646.shtml
>>-RickG
>>
>>On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
>> wrote:
>> > I don't Steve.
>> >
>> > But think of it like an echo.  You get that first, clear signal coming in,
>> > laser straight.  Then at some point shortly after that you start
>> getting the
>> > reflections.  If there are too many of them, and/or they are at the wrong
>> > time the radio will get confused.
>> >
>> > G SHOULD handle this better than B.  It's made to use multipath's echoes to
>> > reassemble a complete message.  Sometimes it works that way, sometimes it
>> > doesn't.
>> >
>> > I'd have to say, for me, g is usually better with multipath than b though.
>> > B handles interference better.  At least that's what I'm seeing.  I have a
>> > tower that was giving 1 meg down 2 to 3 up, almost all customers
>> saw that or
>> > worse.  Swapped back to b mode only and it's now a consistent 4 megs both
>> > ways.
>> >
>> > Another thing to try is to turn down the power.  Probably on both ends.  If
>> > you are at -69 see if you can drop your ap by 5 then 5 more db.  Make sure
>> > to drop the cpe by the same amount.  What you are trying to do is move the
>> > echo down so far that it can't be "heard".
>> >
>> > I've also had installs that are happiest about 2' above the ground!
>> >
>> > Here's a fun one for you.  I've got one customer that shoots near a grain
>> > elevator.  Most of the year he works fine, but near harvest,
>> every year, his
>> > performance goes out the window.  It seems that the wheat in the
>> elevator is
>> > moved out and the empty elevator is worse than the full one.
>> >
>> > Out here we have VERY long links.  I have one at 18
>> miles.  PTMP.  Yet there
>> > are also customers within 1 mile.  10 to 15 mile links are common place.
>> > Multipath is a real head ache as the ground conditions change.  Customer's
>> > service will be perfect, until it snows.  Or until they harvest a field, or
>> > the ground dries out, or it rains etc.
>> >
>> > Fortunately MOST of the time this isn't an issue.  But when it does hit ya,
>> > it can be very hard to figure out.
>> >
>> > One other thing you might want to try with your customer, turn the radio to
>> > the wrong polarity.  You are very close to the tower so you should still
>> > have enough signal.  I've not had to do this very often, but it's a little
>> > trick that has worked before.  I've also pointed them 180* the
>> wrong way and
>> > had that work very well, especially with a grid.
>> >
>> > Let us know if anything helps.
>> > marlon
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> > From: "Steve Barnes" 
>> > To: "WISPA General List" 
>> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:07 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
>> >
>> >
>> >> Marlon, DO you have or know of a good white paper on Multipath issues?  I
>> >> agree with your assessment but I have several locations that I have not
>> >> been able to resolve Multipath for.  I had an installation last week 3
>> >> miles from tower AP.  Clear line of site other than going over the
>> >> Neighbors Metal barn and between 4 metal grain bins. We could get a -69 On
>> >> 50% of the property but retries were 98% No matter where we tried High-Low
>> >> left right. 100 yards either way on the road and <10% retries and a -65
>> >> signal.  I just need to some documentation to solidify my understanding.
>> >>
>> >> Steve Barnes
>> >> Manager
>> >> PCS-WIN
>> >> RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
>> >>
>> >> Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience
>> >> of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared,
>> >> ambition inspired, and success achieved.
>> >> - Helen Keller
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> >> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
>> >> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:45 AM
>> >> To: WISPA General List
>> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
>> >>
>> >> Is that a bigger or smaller antenna size than what you have now?
>> >>
>> >> If you moved up by 10' and increased your signal levels, what 1000% or so,
>> >> I'd REALLY say that this is looking like a multipath issue.
>> >>
>> >> Often with multipath I've seen the signals hold well but performance suck.
>> >> It'll sometimes kill the signal though.
>> >>
>> >> I h

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Mike
I did the same thing.  But, it won't even let you look at the Wiki 
unless you're logged in.  But I think you can check the "always keep 
me logged in" box and be automatically logged in.  At least until you 
delete cookies?  Rick Harnish forwarded my request on to Rick in 
Accounting :-) .  He squared me away.

Mike

At 08:32 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>That is what I expected, but I don't see a forgot link.
>
>Josh Luthman wrote:
> > Click login then forgot password.
> >
> > On 10/18/09, Scott Reed  wrote:
> >
> >> I was going to suggest that.  Wanted to look at the Wiki first, but can
> >> not remember my login.
> >> Where do I go to find/reset login information?
> >>
> >>
> >> Josh Luthman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Use the WISPNet Wiki?
> >>>
> >>> On 10/18/09, Robert West  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
>  Like a sticky?  Maybe.
> 
> 
> 
>  -Original Message-
>  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>  Behalf Of Mike
>  Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 AM
>  To: WISPA General List
>  Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
> 
>  I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
>  talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
>  just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
>  list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
>  description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
>  software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
> 
>  I'll start:
> 
>  what: EZRJ-45 connector system
>  where: www.ezrj45.com
>  why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
>  find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
>  CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
>  ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
>  verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
>  tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
>  cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
>  saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
>  Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
> 
>  Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
>  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>  http://signup.wispa.org/
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
>  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
>  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>  http://signup.wispa.org/
>  
> 
> 
>  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
>  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
>  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >>> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release 
> Date: 10/18/09
> >>> 09:04:00
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Scott Reed
> >> Sr. Systems Engineer
> >> GAB Midwest
> >> 1-800-363-1544 x4000
> >> Cell: 260-273-7239
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> 
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >> 
> 
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release Date: 
> 10/18/09 09:04:00
> >
> >
>
>--
>Scott Reed
>Sr. Systems Engineer
>GAB Midwest
>1-800-363-1544 x4000
>Cell: 260-273-7239
>
>
>
>
>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




--

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Been a long time since I screwed one up.  I don't do too many soo...

On 10/18/09, Scott Reed  wrote:
> That is what I expected, but I don't see a forgot link.
>
> Josh Luthman wrote:
>> Click login then forgot password.
>>
>> On 10/18/09, Scott Reed  wrote:
>>
>>> I was going to suggest that.  Wanted to look at the Wiki first, but can
>>> not remember my login.
>>> Where do I go to find/reset login information?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
 Use the WISPNet Wiki?

 On 10/18/09, Robert West  wrote:


> Like a sticky?  Maybe.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>
> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>
> I'll start:
>
> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
> where: www.ezrj45.com
> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
> saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
> Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>

 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release Date:
 10/18/09
 09:04:00



>>> --
>>> Scott Reed
>>> Sr. Systems Engineer
>>> GAB Midwest
>>> 1-800-363-1544 x4000
>>> Cell: 260-273-7239
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release Date: 10/18/09
>> 09:04:00
>>
>>
>
> --
> Scott Reed
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> GAB Midwest
> 1-800-363-1544 x4000
> Cell: 260-273-7239
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--

Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy....

2009-10-18 Thread Mike
Rick:

Why did it solve the problem? Better side lobe attenuation?  'Splain Lucy.

Mike

At 08:42 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>I fixed a nasty multipath issue for one of my subs by using a yagi.
>Here are some good sources for info:
>http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1121691
>www.crystalcomltd.com/...whitepapers/124102032509Berkeley_Multipath.pdf
>http://www.rfengineer.net/1171/rf-basics-multipath/
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a008019f646.shtml
>-RickG
>
>On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
> wrote:
> > I don't Steve.
> >
> > But think of it like an echo.  You get that first, clear signal coming in,
> > laser straight.  Then at some point shortly after that you start 
> getting the
> > reflections.  If there are too many of them, and/or they are at the wrong
> > time the radio will get confused.
> >
> > G SHOULD handle this better than B.  It's made to use multipath's echoes to
> > reassemble a complete message.  Sometimes it works that way, sometimes it
> > doesn't.
> >
> > I'd have to say, for me, g is usually better with multipath than b though.
> > B handles interference better.  At least that's what I'm seeing.  I have a
> > tower that was giving 1 meg down 2 to 3 up, almost all customers 
> saw that or
> > worse.  Swapped back to b mode only and it's now a consistent 4 megs both
> > ways.
> >
> > Another thing to try is to turn down the power.  Probably on both ends.  If
> > you are at -69 see if you can drop your ap by 5 then 5 more db.  Make sure
> > to drop the cpe by the same amount.  What you are trying to do is move the
> > echo down so far that it can't be "heard".
> >
> > I've also had installs that are happiest about 2' above the ground!
> >
> > Here's a fun one for you.  I've got one customer that shoots near a grain
> > elevator.  Most of the year he works fine, but near harvest, 
> every year, his
> > performance goes out the window.  It seems that the wheat in the 
> elevator is
> > moved out and the empty elevator is worse than the full one.
> >
> > Out here we have VERY long links.  I have one at 18 
> miles.  PTMP.  Yet there
> > are also customers within 1 mile.  10 to 15 mile links are common place.
> > Multipath is a real head ache as the ground conditions change.  Customer's
> > service will be perfect, until it snows.  Or until they harvest a field, or
> > the ground dries out, or it rains etc.
> >
> > Fortunately MOST of the time this isn't an issue.  But when it does hit ya,
> > it can be very hard to figure out.
> >
> > One other thing you might want to try with your customer, turn the radio to
> > the wrong polarity.  You are very close to the tower so you should still
> > have enough signal.  I've not had to do this very often, but it's a little
> > trick that has worked before.  I've also pointed them 180* the 
> wrong way and
> > had that work very well, especially with a grid.
> >
> > Let us know if anything helps.
> > marlon
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Steve Barnes" 
> > To: "WISPA General List" 
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:07 AM
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
> >
> >
> >> Marlon, DO you have or know of a good white paper on Multipath issues?  I
> >> agree with your assessment but I have several locations that I have not
> >> been able to resolve Multipath for.  I had an installation last week 3
> >> miles from tower AP.  Clear line of site other than going over the
> >> Neighbors Metal barn and between 4 metal grain bins. We could get a -69 On
> >> 50% of the property but retries were 98% No matter where we tried High-Low
> >> left right. 100 yards either way on the road and <10% retries and a -65
> >> signal.  I just need to some documentation to solidify my understanding.
> >>
> >> Steve Barnes
> >> Manager
> >> PCS-WIN
> >> RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
> >>
> >> Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience
> >> of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared,
> >> ambition inspired, and success achieved.
> >> - Helen Keller
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
> >> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:45 AM
> >> To: WISPA General List
> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
> >>
> >> Is that a bigger or smaller antenna size than what you have now?
> >>
> >> If you moved up by 10' and increased your signal levels, what 1000% or so,
> >> I'd REALLY say that this is looking like a multipath issue.
> >>
> >> Often with multipath I've seen the signals hold well but performance suck.
> >> It'll sometimes kill the signal though.
> >>
> >> I had one install that has some power lines in the way.  Fought
> >> intermittent
> >> outages etc. for over a year.  His signal was OK, but not great.  Finally
> >> something changes a bit and his signal dropped too low.
> >>
> >> Hmmm, b

Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy....

2009-10-18 Thread RickG
I fixed a nasty multipath issue for one of my subs by using a yagi.
Here are some good sources for info:
http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1121691
www.crystalcomltd.com/...whitepapers/124102032509Berkeley_Multipath.pdf
http://www.rfengineer.net/1171/rf-basics-multipath/
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a008019f646.shtml
-RickG

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
 wrote:
> I don't Steve.
>
> But think of it like an echo.  You get that first, clear signal coming in,
> laser straight.  Then at some point shortly after that you start getting the
> reflections.  If there are too many of them, and/or they are at the wrong
> time the radio will get confused.
>
> G SHOULD handle this better than B.  It's made to use multipath's echoes to
> reassemble a complete message.  Sometimes it works that way, sometimes it
> doesn't.
>
> I'd have to say, for me, g is usually better with multipath than b though.
> B handles interference better.  At least that's what I'm seeing.  I have a
> tower that was giving 1 meg down 2 to 3 up, almost all customers saw that or
> worse.  Swapped back to b mode only and it's now a consistent 4 megs both
> ways.
>
> Another thing to try is to turn down the power.  Probably on both ends.  If
> you are at -69 see if you can drop your ap by 5 then 5 more db.  Make sure
> to drop the cpe by the same amount.  What you are trying to do is move the
> echo down so far that it can't be "heard".
>
> I've also had installs that are happiest about 2' above the ground!
>
> Here's a fun one for you.  I've got one customer that shoots near a grain
> elevator.  Most of the year he works fine, but near harvest, every year, his
> performance goes out the window.  It seems that the wheat in the elevator is
> moved out and the empty elevator is worse than the full one.
>
> Out here we have VERY long links.  I have one at 18 miles.  PTMP.  Yet there
> are also customers within 1 mile.  10 to 15 mile links are common place.
> Multipath is a real head ache as the ground conditions change.  Customer's
> service will be perfect, until it snows.  Or until they harvest a field, or
> the ground dries out, or it rains etc.
>
> Fortunately MOST of the time this isn't an issue.  But when it does hit ya,
> it can be very hard to figure out.
>
> One other thing you might want to try with your customer, turn the radio to
> the wrong polarity.  You are very close to the tower so you should still
> have enough signal.  I've not had to do this very often, but it's a little
> trick that has worked before.  I've also pointed them 180* the wrong way and
> had that work very well, especially with a grid.
>
> Let us know if anything helps.
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Barnes" 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
>
>
>> Marlon, DO you have or know of a good white paper on Multipath issues?  I
>> agree with your assessment but I have several locations that I have not
>> been able to resolve Multipath for.  I had an installation last week 3
>> miles from tower AP.  Clear line of site other than going over the
>> Neighbors Metal barn and between 4 metal grain bins. We could get a -69 On
>> 50% of the property but retries were 98% No matter where we tried High-Low
>> left right. 100 yards either way on the road and <10% retries and a -65
>> signal.  I just need to some documentation to solidify my understanding.
>>
>> Steve Barnes
>> Manager
>> PCS-WIN
>> RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
>>
>> Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience
>> of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared,
>> ambition inspired, and success achieved.
>> - Helen Keller
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:45 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
>>
>> Is that a bigger or smaller antenna size than what you have now?
>>
>> If you moved up by 10' and increased your signal levels, what 1000% or so,
>> I'd REALLY say that this is looking like a multipath issue.
>>
>> Often with multipath I've seen the signals hold well but performance suck.
>> It'll sometimes kill the signal though.
>>
>> I had one install that has some power lines in the way.  Fought
>> intermittent
>> outages etc. for over a year.  His signal was OK, but not great.  Finally
>> something changes a bit and his signal dropped too low.
>>
>> Hmmm, bad radio.  So I pulled his radio out and put in a brand new one,
>> still crappy signal.
>>
>> Double hm
>>
>> I put the old radio back in, left it off the mount and moved it around to
>> see what would happen.  (I always leave 6 to 10' of cable on the mount
>> just
>> for things like this.)
>>
>> Triple hm
>>
>> Move the radio to

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Scott Reed
That is what I expected, but I don't see a forgot link.

Josh Luthman wrote:
> Click login then forgot password.
>
> On 10/18/09, Scott Reed  wrote:
>   
>> I was going to suggest that.  Wanted to look at the Wiki first, but can
>> not remember my login.
>> Where do I go to find/reset login information?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman wrote:
>> 
>>> Use the WISPNet Wiki?
>>>
>>> On 10/18/09, Robert West  wrote:
>>>
>>>   
 Like a sticky?  Maybe.



 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Mike
 Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have

 I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
 talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
 just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
 list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
 description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
 software etc ... you would like to share with the group.

 I'll start:

 what: EZRJ-45 connector system
 where: www.ezrj45.com
 why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
 find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
 CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
 ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
 verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
 tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
 cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
 saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
 Ethernet plug since I started using this system.

 Mike




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release Date: 10/18/09
>>> 09:04:00
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>> --
>> Scott Reed
>> Sr. Systems Engineer
>> GAB Midwest
>> 1-800-363-1544 x4000
>> Cell: 260-273-7239
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>> 
>
>
>   
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release Date: 10/18/09 
> 09:04:00
>
>   

-- 
Scott Reed
Sr. Systems Engineer
GAB Midwest
1-800-363-1544 x4000
Cell: 260-273-7239




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Mike
what:   wonderpole 40' fiberglass "push up" pole
where:  http://www.wonderpole.com/wp640_630.html
why:It is easy to take a telescoping pole to a site survey and 
put a panel up in air for testing.  I don't push mine out to 40' 
often, and not for long, but regularly push it up 26' or so to do a 
test.  Well made, reasonably priced, and made in the good old USA.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Mike
I gotta agree.  One other nice thing with the EZRJ45 system is 
because the wires stick out the end of the plug as far as you 
want.  You can verify the order, or pull them out and push them back 
in.  THEN, you can grab the excess and pull until the jacket is as 
far up the plug as possible, THEN crimp.  I can't tell you how many 
crimps I've come across where the technician didn't get the jacket 
crimped and a mm of strands shows before the plug.

They also work with either stranded or solid wire so you don't have 
to have both or KNOW the difference between pointed or spade crimp 
points.  I put the inventor of this crimp system in the same league 
as the geek who came up with sticky notes.

Mike

At 07:27 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>I don't care how much they cost.  One crimp, gone.
>
>Phil





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Robert West
I agree.  At 50 cents, the aggravation saved is worth it.  Anything to
lessen the B.S. of life has value, in my opinion.  I have issues too with
the eyesight, I have to look at the things with a magnifying glass sometimes
to make sure the wires are seated all the way.  



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Phil Curnutt
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 8:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

I don't care how much they cost.  One crimp, gone.

Phil

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:03 PM, 3-dB Networks  wrote:

> I strongly recommend this cable because I think it helps a lot telling if
> you got the right color wire in the right hole.  Sometimes finding that
> stripe on the white can be difficult:  http://tinyurl.com/ygxeywo
>
>
> Daniel White
> 3-dB Networks
> http://www.3dbnetworks.com
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> >Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> >Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:56 PM
> >To: WISPA General List
> >Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have
> >
> >But you're missing the point.
> >Yeah, Its definately not worth it, for those that can use the standard
> >CAT5s
> >effectively.
> >But your math assumes that they can, and not considering the other
> >costs.
> >The ROI is NOT on the time saved comparing successful installs,
> >comparing
> >both types.
> >The ROI is on time saved comparing costs of failed connector installs.
> >
> >What does it cost you if you crimp an end, and get a flaky crimp, and
> >the
> >link not work? How long does it take to figure out which side of the
> >cable
> >had the bad crimp?
> >A 25 cent RJ-45 becomes 50 cents, if you ahve to cut one off and replace
> >it.
> >I can give an example of recently where I had to send a guy back into
> >the
> >city (half day's labor) to fix a packet loss problem caused by defective
> >CAT5 plug terminations.
> >But most of the lost time was in the office troubleshooting the
> >defective
> >packloss link trying to find what was wrong.
> >
> >I can sympathise with eye sight degrating, in my older age :-( .
> >The error rate of successful CAT5 terminations go up, if eye sight is
> >going
> >down.
> >
> >The question to ask is are the installers having to high a failure
> >rate
> >for their first crimpts? If they are, then it may be a good investment.
> >As well, I look at my time as worth $100/hr, and I'd gladly spend the
> >extra
> >$100 for connectors if it meant I was more likely to have sucessful
> >crimpts
> >the first time.
> >I compare... Risking paying 25 cent extra verus risk spending extra $100
> >in
> >time figuring out where I made the Crimp mistake.
> >
> >For the record, I do not use EZ-Rj45 plugs. But I understand the value
> >of
> >Using the best RJ-45Plugs, and the ROI is there.  I personally like to
> >use
> >the the RJ45 Plugs sold by Shireen.
> >Ever since we started using them, terminations have been so much easier
> >and
> >successful.
> >
> >I like the Shireen plugs because they have just the right wire hole
> >diameters for the wire to slide in easy, and I can be certain that
> >they'll
> >slide into the right slots as I tried to align them to.
> >(Its becoming harder for me to tell the wire color once its inside the
> >Jack,
> >due to eyes). And I can be certain they'll crimp securely.
> >
> >I also got tired of the two peice CAT5 jacks, because I always kept
> >loosing
> >the second peices, and ended up having to throw away 20% of them that
> >would
> >be incomplete set.
> >
> >
> >Tom DeReggi
> >RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> >IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Josh Luthman" 
> >To: "WISPA General List" 
> >Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:15 PM
> >Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have
> >
> >
> >> At 200/mo you'd need at least one more customer per month.   Don't see
> >> this happening by speeding up rj45 connectors.
> >>
> >> On 10/18/09, Travis Johnson  wrote:
> >>> These do look great... and I would love to buy them for my
> >installers...
> >>> but
> >>> $.50 per connector compared to what I pay now would cost me an extra
> >$200
> >>> per month just in connectors. :(
> >>>
> >>> Travis
> >>> Microserv
> >>>
> >>> Mike wrote:
> 
>  They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
>    Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com
> 
> 
>  At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
> 
> >
> > Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as
> >well.
> >
> > marlon
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Mike" 
> > To: "WISPA General List" 
> > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
> > Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
> >> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
> >> just make life as a WISP easier.  I t

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Phil Curnutt
I don't care how much they cost.  One crimp, gone.

Phil

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:03 PM, 3-dB Networks  wrote:

> I strongly recommend this cable because I think it helps a lot telling if
> you got the right color wire in the right hole.  Sometimes finding that
> stripe on the white can be difficult:  http://tinyurl.com/ygxeywo
>
>
> Daniel White
> 3-dB Networks
> http://www.3dbnetworks.com
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> >Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> >Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:56 PM
> >To: WISPA General List
> >Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have
> >
> >But you're missing the point.
> >Yeah, Its definately not worth it, for those that can use the standard
> >CAT5s
> >effectively.
> >But your math assumes that they can, and not considering the other
> >costs.
> >The ROI is NOT on the time saved comparing successful installs,
> >comparing
> >both types.
> >The ROI is on time saved comparing costs of failed connector installs.
> >
> >What does it cost you if you crimp an end, and get a flaky crimp, and
> >the
> >link not work? How long does it take to figure out which side of the
> >cable
> >had the bad crimp?
> >A 25 cent RJ-45 becomes 50 cents, if you ahve to cut one off and replace
> >it.
> >I can give an example of recently where I had to send a guy back into
> >the
> >city (half day's labor) to fix a packet loss problem caused by defective
> >CAT5 plug terminations.
> >But most of the lost time was in the office troubleshooting the
> >defective
> >packloss link trying to find what was wrong.
> >
> >I can sympathise with eye sight degrating, in my older age :-( .
> >The error rate of successful CAT5 terminations go up, if eye sight is
> >going
> >down.
> >
> >The question to ask is are the installers having to high a failure
> >rate
> >for their first crimpts? If they are, then it may be a good investment.
> >As well, I look at my time as worth $100/hr, and I'd gladly spend the
> >extra
> >$100 for connectors if it meant I was more likely to have sucessful
> >crimpts
> >the first time.
> >I compare... Risking paying 25 cent extra verus risk spending extra $100
> >in
> >time figuring out where I made the Crimp mistake.
> >
> >For the record, I do not use EZ-Rj45 plugs. But I understand the value
> >of
> >Using the best RJ-45Plugs, and the ROI is there.  I personally like to
> >use
> >the the RJ45 Plugs sold by Shireen.
> >Ever since we started using them, terminations have been so much easier
> >and
> >successful.
> >
> >I like the Shireen plugs because they have just the right wire hole
> >diameters for the wire to slide in easy, and I can be certain that
> >they'll
> >slide into the right slots as I tried to align them to.
> >(Its becoming harder for me to tell the wire color once its inside the
> >Jack,
> >due to eyes). And I can be certain they'll crimp securely.
> >
> >I also got tired of the two peice CAT5 jacks, because I always kept
> >loosing
> >the second peices, and ended up having to throw away 20% of them that
> >would
> >be incomplete set.
> >
> >
> >Tom DeReggi
> >RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> >IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Josh Luthman" 
> >To: "WISPA General List" 
> >Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:15 PM
> >Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have
> >
> >
> >> At 200/mo you'd need at least one more customer per month.   Don't see
> >> this happening by speeding up rj45 connectors.
> >>
> >> On 10/18/09, Travis Johnson  wrote:
> >>> These do look great... and I would love to buy them for my
> >installers...
> >>> but
> >>> $.50 per connector compared to what I pay now would cost me an extra
> >$200
> >>> per month just in connectors. :(
> >>>
> >>> Travis
> >>> Microserv
> >>>
> >>> Mike wrote:
> 
>  They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
>    Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com
> 
> 
>  At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
> 
> >
> > Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as
> >well.
> >
> > marlon
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Mike" 
> > To: "WISPA General List" 
> > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
> > Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
> >> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
> >> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial
> >to
> >> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained
> >a
> >> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
> >> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
> >>
> >> I'll start:
> >>
> >> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
> >> where: www.ezrj45.com
> >> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light
> >situations, I
> >> find it very difficult to get all 

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread 3-dB Networks
I strongly recommend this cable because I think it helps a lot telling if
you got the right color wire in the right hole.  Sometimes finding that
stripe on the white can be difficult:  http://tinyurl.com/ygxeywo


Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com


>-Original Message-
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
>Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:56 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>
>But you're missing the point.
>Yeah, Its definately not worth it, for those that can use the standard
>CAT5s
>effectively.
>But your math assumes that they can, and not considering the other
>costs.
>The ROI is NOT on the time saved comparing successful installs,
>comparing
>both types.
>The ROI is on time saved comparing costs of failed connector installs.
>
>What does it cost you if you crimp an end, and get a flaky crimp, and
>the
>link not work? How long does it take to figure out which side of the
>cable
>had the bad crimp?
>A 25 cent RJ-45 becomes 50 cents, if you ahve to cut one off and replace
>it.
>I can give an example of recently where I had to send a guy back into
>the
>city (half day's labor) to fix a packet loss problem caused by defective
>CAT5 plug terminations.
>But most of the lost time was in the office troubleshooting the
>defective
>packloss link trying to find what was wrong.
>
>I can sympathise with eye sight degrating, in my older age :-( .
>The error rate of successful CAT5 terminations go up, if eye sight is
>going
>down.
>
>The question to ask is are the installers having to high a failure
>rate
>for their first crimpts? If they are, then it may be a good investment.
>As well, I look at my time as worth $100/hr, and I'd gladly spend the
>extra
>$100 for connectors if it meant I was more likely to have sucessful
>crimpts
>the first time.
>I compare... Risking paying 25 cent extra verus risk spending extra $100
>in
>time figuring out where I made the Crimp mistake.
>
>For the record, I do not use EZ-Rj45 plugs. But I understand the value
>of
>Using the best RJ-45Plugs, and the ROI is there.  I personally like to
>use
>the the RJ45 Plugs sold by Shireen.
>Ever since we started using them, terminations have been so much easier
>and
>successful.
>
>I like the Shireen plugs because they have just the right wire hole
>diameters for the wire to slide in easy, and I can be certain that
>they'll
>slide into the right slots as I tried to align them to.
>(Its becoming harder for me to tell the wire color once its inside the
>Jack,
>due to eyes). And I can be certain they'll crimp securely.
>
>I also got tired of the two peice CAT5 jacks, because I always kept
>loosing
>the second peices, and ended up having to throw away 20% of them that
>would
>be incomplete set.
>
>
>Tom DeReggi
>RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Josh Luthman" 
>To: "WISPA General List" 
>Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:15 PM
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>
>
>> At 200/mo you'd need at least one more customer per month.   Don't see
>> this happening by speeding up rj45 connectors.
>>
>> On 10/18/09, Travis Johnson  wrote:
>>> These do look great... and I would love to buy them for my
>installers...
>>> but
>>> $.50 per connector compared to what I pay now would cost me an extra
>$200
>>> per month just in connectors. :(
>>>
>>> Travis
>>> Microserv
>>>
>>> Mike wrote:

 They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
   Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com


 At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:

>
> Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as
>well.
>
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike" 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>
>
>
>>
>> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
>> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
>> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial
>to
>> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained
>a
>> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
>> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>>
>> I'll start:
>>
>> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
>> where: www.ezrj45.com
>> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light
>situations, I
>> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
>> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a
>quite
>> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You
>can
>> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
>> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades
>that
>> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a
>time

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Tom DeReggi
But you're missing the point.
Yeah, Its definately not worth it, for those that can use the standard CAT5s 
effectively.
But your math assumes that they can, and not considering the other costs.
The ROI is NOT on the time saved comparing successful installs, comparing 
both types.
The ROI is on time saved comparing costs of failed connector installs.

What does it cost you if you crimp an end, and get a flaky crimp, and the 
link not work? How long does it take to figure out which side of the cable 
had the bad crimp?
A 25 cent RJ-45 becomes 50 cents, if you ahve to cut one off and replace it.
I can give an example of recently where I had to send a guy back into the 
city (half day's labor) to fix a packet loss problem caused by defective 
CAT5 plug terminations.
But most of the lost time was in the office troubleshooting the defective 
packloss link trying to find what was wrong.

I can sympathise with eye sight degrating, in my older age :-( .
The error rate of successful CAT5 terminations go up, if eye sight is going 
down.

The question to ask is are the installers having to high a failure rate 
for their first crimpts? If they are, then it may be a good investment.
As well, I look at my time as worth $100/hr, and I'd gladly spend the extra 
$100 for connectors if it meant I was more likely to have sucessful crimpts 
the first time.
I compare... Risking paying 25 cent extra verus risk spending extra $100 in 
time figuring out where I made the Crimp mistake.

For the record, I do not use EZ-Rj45 plugs. But I understand the value of 
Using the best RJ-45Plugs, and the ROI is there.  I personally like to use 
the the RJ45 Plugs sold by Shireen.
Ever since we started using them, terminations have been so much easier and 
successful.

I like the Shireen plugs because they have just the right wire hole 
diameters for the wire to slide in easy, and I can be certain that they'll 
slide into the right slots as I tried to align them to.
(Its becoming harder for me to tell the wire color once its inside the Jack, 
due to eyes). And I can be certain they'll crimp securely.

I also got tired of the two peice CAT5 jacks, because I always kept loosing 
the second peices, and ended up having to throw away 20% of them that would 
be incomplete set.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Josh Luthman" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have


> At 200/mo you'd need at least one more customer per month.   Don't see
> this happening by speeding up rj45 connectors.
>
> On 10/18/09, Travis Johnson  wrote:
>> These do look great... and I would love to buy them for my installers... 
>> but
>> $.50 per connector compared to what I pay now would cost me an extra $200
>> per month just in connectors. :(
>>
>> Travis
>> Microserv
>>
>> Mike wrote:
>>>
>>> They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
>>>   Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com
>>>
>>>
>>> At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>>>

 Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as well.

 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: "Mike" 
 To: "WISPA General List" 
 Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have



>
> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>
> I'll start:
>
> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
> where: www.ezrj45.com
> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
> saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
> Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

>
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>

 

>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>

Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto Cruiser

2009-10-18 Thread John J. Thomas
If you are working with law enforcement, they generraly need FIPs compliance on 
anything that touches their network.

John
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert West [mailto:robert.w...@just-micro.com]
>Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:05 PM
>To: lakel...@gbcx.net, ''WISPA General List''
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from 
>Stationto   Cruiser
>
>Yeah, that's the part I was leery of when he asked.  I knew there were some
>sort of safeguards that had to be followed and I'm totally green in that
>area.  We've done a few medical sites that had to be HIPPA compliant and it
>wasn't such a big deal but I hate messing with the cops.  They have other
>ways to complain other than not paying an invoice.
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of lakel...@gbcx.net
>Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 1:49 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto
>Cruiser
>
>Be careful of the new federal encryption requirements for anything hooked up
>to the National Crime Computers. 
>
>A lot of states have new rules also when interfacing to the state DMV and
>crime networks
>
>Just FYI
>
>-B-
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jayson Baker 
>Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:37:26 
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station
>   to Cruiser
>
>We currently do this for a local PD.  They have 13 of those ruggedized Dell
>laptops, mounted in all the cars.
>We looked at 2.4GHz and 900MHz.  Even though the town is only 5sqmi, we
>decided to go with Verizon Aircards.
>
>Worked out well, because the laptops are tied directly into their CAD
>system, which is tied into the whole state.
>So now they could, theoretically, go anywhere in the state and be dispatched
>on a call, run plates/people through NCIC, etc.
>
>I believe that because of that, they actually got the state to pay for a lot
>of it.
>
>Sure, we don't make anything on the Verizon service, but we do on the
>backend by tying their CAD into the Internet.
>
>Just something to keep in mind, if you have any sort of 3G service in that
>area.
>
>Jayson
>
>On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Robert West
>wrote:
>
>> I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little spot
>> in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to the
>> station network via a wireless link.  (He is the "Police Chief" but I
>> suspect he is also the entire police force)  He said that the local
>> Wal-Mart
>> has agreed to donate to him a few of those little Acer 7" screen laptops,
>> which are a big piece of crap from the number of repairs we've had to do
>on
>> them...  Anyhow, he wants to be able to be in the cruiser and connect to
>> the
>> network back at the station and use the websites from the Attorney
>> General's
>> office where he can run plates, drivers license info and also fill out his
>> reports.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the setup..
>>
>>
>>
>> This Burg is a bit less than 2 miles long and about one and a half miles
>> wide.  The town hall is equivalent to a 4 story building and they also
>have
>> a water tower that looks to be 100 foot tall.  The terrain is flat as can
>> be
>> and they have the normal scattering of trees.  The Town Hall and water
>> tower
>> are the tallest structures by far aside from a large grain elevator right
>> outside of town.  Boy wants to connect to his network anywhere in town
>from
>> his cop-mobile as well as when he is at home, also within the town.
>>
>>
>>
>> We've done plenty of private networks but it's all been in the 2.4 and
>5ghz
>> band.  He was thinking he could just throw up a 2.4ghz link and be good
>but
>> I told him to hold on, I didn't think he could broadcast the Attorney
>> Generals network to every antenna in town, I had to do some research.  So
>> this, because of my utterly blatant laziness, is my research. J
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone been down this path?  What can we do and not do?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a meeting with the guy next Wednesday and want to have some idea of
>> what we're up against on this one.  (Hopefully he doesn't recognize me as
>> the guy who took him to court over a ticket he wrote for a crooked license
>> plate...  I won that one by the way)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert West
>>
>> Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
>>
>> 740-335-7020
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
>---

Re: [WISPA] Simultaneous connections

2009-10-18 Thread John J. Thomas
FWIW, Cisco 871's will route wirespeed at 100 megabits/sec, but can only 
firewall/NAT/VPN at 25 megabits/sec.

John

>-Original Message-
>From: Al Stewart [mailto:stewa...@westcreston.ca]
>Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 03:05 PM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Simultaneous connections
>
>Thanks Tom ...
>
>I know some of the cheaper wireless routers on our system have been 
>causing speed problems for various reasons. And I can see the reasons 
>for the problems. But for most people, I guess a router is a router, 
>and they don't want to spend big bucks.
>
>For myself, I'm looking to replace my own personal D-Link DI-704P 
>(wired) with another wired unit. Researching models gives all kinds 
>of conflicting info/complaints/recommendations. Someone here 
>recommended, so I guess I'll see what I can track down on that.
>
>Al
>
>-- At 05:54 PM 10/16/2009 -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote: ---
>
>>Yes they can be the cause for numerous reasons.
>>
>>1) they can start to go flaky, and when gone flaky they can cause hesitent
>>throughput, (sorta like when a CPU overheats, or when a bus or cache limit
>>gets exceeded) that will force TCPIP congestion to slow throughput.  Its not
>>uncommon to have cases where we replace a router with another of the same
>>brand/model and the speed testing improves by 4x. BUT when this happens it
>>is because the product had become defective, not because the unit wasn't
>>originally capable..
>>
>>2) a 10mbps port does not guarantee that a route can push 10mbps. 10mbps is
>>just the speed of the NIC itself. Many cheaper or older generation routers
>>have very slow processors and can slow down with small packet traffic. Not
>>just processors but memory and bus design. Also, all firmwares might not be
>>optimize for higher speeds. For example, for GB you might want large network
>>buffers, where as routers that were developed at the day of 1mbps max DSL,
>>may have optimized for the typic speed, and used fewer buffers to conserve
>>RAM, and use less ram to lower costs.
>>
>>However, MOST routers of current generation are pretty capable, and usually
>>do fine up at higher speeds.  Also be cautious of using a VPN router,
>>because it can take quite a bit of overhead to encrypt or compress the
>>tunnel, and could get slowed at high speed.  The best thing to do is to
>>certify the peak speed of any Router that you plan to use regularly. Dont
>>believe the Spec sheet, believe your own Iperf test results.
>>
>>The issue is how do you tell if a router is flaking out and how can you test
>>the router's capabilty remotely if a support call arises?
>>If you dont have a way to test certify it working to spec, how do you know
>>it is?
>>
>>This is why we tend to use more power routers when we can. We like them to
>>have processor powerful enough to run full speed throughput tests directly
>>to the router.
>>In other words, A router can always pass much more traffic speeds through
>>it, than it can actuallu hald directly to or from it.  Having fast
>>processors in the routers, creating extra headroom, gets aroud this problem.
>>
>>
>>Tom DeReggi
>>RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>>IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Al Stewart" 
>>To: "WISPA General List" 
>>Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:30 PM
>>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Simultaneous connections
>>
>>
>> > Thanks ... this helps.
>> >
>> > One more question. Do routers being used by the subscribers (wired or
>> > wireless) ever affect the speed/bandwidth. I don't see how that can
>> > be as they are designed to pass 10 Meg to the WAN, which is six times
>> > at least what the
>> > nominal bandwidth would be. One tech guy is trying to blame routers
>> > for all problems. But I have yet to see the logic in that. Unless of
>> > course one is malfunctioning or dying or something. But that can't be
>> > ALL the routers in the system.
>> >
>> > Al
>> >
>> > -- At 02:15 PM 10/15/2009 -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote: ---
>> >
>> >>Everything goes to crap, unless you've put in bandwdith management to
>> >>address those conditions.
>> >>The problem gets worse when  Traffic becomes... Lots of small packets
>> >>and/or
>> >>lots of uploads.
>> >>Obviously Peer-to-Peer can have those characteristics.
>> >>The bigger problem is NOT fairly sharing bandwidith per sub, but instead
>> >>managing based on what percentage of bandwidth is going up versus down.
>> >>This can be a problem when Bandwdith mangement is Full Duplex, and Radios
>> >>are Half Duplex, and its never certain whether end user traffic is gfoing
>> >>to
>> >>be up or down during the congestion time.
>> >>Generally congestion will happen in teh upload direction more, because its
>> >>common practice to assume majority of bandwidth use is in teh download
>> >>direction, so most providers allocate more bandwdith for download.
>> >>Therfore
>> >>when there is an unsuspecting surge in upload bandwdith, the limited
>> >>amount
>> >>of upload

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Josh Luthman
At 200/mo you'd need at least one more customer per month.   Don't see
this happening by speeding up rj45 connectors.

On 10/18/09, Travis Johnson  wrote:
> These do look great... and I would love to buy them for my installers... but
> $.50 per connector compared to what I pay now would cost me an extra $200
> per month just in connectors. :(
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Mike wrote:
>>
>> They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
>>   Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com
>>
>>
>> At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as well.
>>>
>>> marlon
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Mike" 
>>> To: "WISPA General List" 
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
>>> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>>>
>>>
>>>

 I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
 talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
 just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
 list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
 description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
 software etc ... you would like to share with the group.

 I'll start:

 what: EZRJ-45 connector system
 where: www.ezrj45.com
 why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
 find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
 CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
 ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
 verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
 tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
 cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
 saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
 Ethernet plug since I started using this system.

 Mike






>>>
>>> 
>>>

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


>>>
>>> 
>>>

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

>>>
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Josh Luthman
At 200/mo you'd need at least one more customer per month.   Don't see
this happening by speeding up rj45 connectors.

On 10/18/09, Travis Johnson  wrote:
> These do look great... and I would love to buy them for my installers... but
> $.50 per connector compared to what I pay now would cost me an extra $200
> per month just in connectors. :(
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Mike wrote:
>>
>> They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
>>   Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com
>>
>>
>> At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as well.
>>>
>>> marlon
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Mike" 
>>> To: "WISPA General List" 
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
>>> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>>>
>>>
>>>

 I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
 talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
 just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
 list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
 description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
 software etc ... you would like to share with the group.

 I'll start:

 what: EZRJ-45 connector system
 where: www.ezrj45.com
 why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
 find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
 CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
 ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
 verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
 tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
 cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
 saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
 Ethernet plug since I started using this system.

 Mike






>>>
>>> 
>>>

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


>>>
>>> 
>>>

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

>>>
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Travis Johnson




These do look great... and I would love to buy them for my
installers... but $.50 per connector compared to what I pay now would
cost me an extra $200 per month just in connectors. :(

Travis
Microserv

Mike wrote:

  They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
  Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com


At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
  
  
Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as well.

marlon

- Original Message -
From: "Mike" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have




  I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
software etc ... you would like to share with the group.

I'll start:

what: EZRJ-45 connector system
where: www.ezrj45.com
why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
Ethernet plug since I started using this system.

Mike





  




  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

  




  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  
  


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Mike
They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
  Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com


At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
>Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as well.
>
>marlon
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mike" 
>To: "WISPA General List" 
>Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
>Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>
>
> >I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
> > talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
> > just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
> > list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
> > description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
> > software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
> >
> > I'll start:
> >
> > what: EZRJ-45 connector system
> > where: www.ezrj45.com
> > why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
> > find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
> > CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
> > ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
> > verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
> > tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
> > cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
> > saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
> > Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > 
> 
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from

2009-10-18 Thread Jeremie Chism
I have a large mobile police department deployment (100 current units  
and 85 more to come). We started with waverider mobile units in the  
cars but had to make a change because of all te problems withthe  
lms8000 radios. We ultimately went with alvarion radios. The cars have  
the ability to move between any of 4 towers and continue to move  
traffic. We have a custom website that we designed for all of their  
information and thy use thinkstream for background checks. We also  
designed a system that integrates their car camera system with a pc  
system. It works well and is priced good. If you have quetions I would  
be glad to help.

Sent from my iPhone



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Click login then forgot password.

On 10/18/09, Scott Reed  wrote:
> I was going to suggest that.  Wanted to look at the Wiki first, but can
> not remember my login.
> Where do I go to find/reset login information?
>
>
> Josh Luthman wrote:
>> Use the WISPNet Wiki?
>>
>> On 10/18/09, Robert West  wrote:
>>
>>> Like a sticky?  Maybe.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Mike
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 AM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>>>
>>> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
>>> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
>>> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
>>> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
>>> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
>>> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>>>
>>> I'll start:
>>>
>>> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
>>> where: www.ezrj45.com
>>> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
>>> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
>>> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
>>> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
>>> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
>>> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
>>> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
>>> saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
>>> Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release Date: 10/18/09
>> 09:04:00
>>
>>
>
> --
> Scott Reed
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> GAB Midwest
> 1-800-363-1544 x4000
> Cell: 260-273-7239
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Scott Reed
I was going to suggest that.  Wanted to look at the Wiki first, but can 
not remember my login.
Where do I go to find/reset login information?


Josh Luthman wrote:
> Use the WISPNet Wiki?
>
> On 10/18/09, Robert West  wrote:
>   
>> Like a sticky?  Maybe.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Mike
>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>>
>> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
>> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
>> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
>> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
>> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
>> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>>
>> I'll start:
>>
>> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
>> where: www.ezrj45.com
>> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
>> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
>> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
>> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
>> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
>> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
>> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
>> saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
>> Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>> 
>
>
>   
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2444 - Release Date: 10/18/09 
> 09:04:00
>
>   

-- 
Scott Reed
Sr. Systems Engineer
GAB Midwest
1-800-363-1544 x4000
Cell: 260-273-7239




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Use the WISPNet Wiki?

On 10/18/09, Robert West  wrote:
> Like a sticky?  Maybe.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>
> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>
> I'll start:
>
> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
> where: www.ezrj45.com
> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
> saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
> Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto Cruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Robert West
I'm with you on that.  I take most any opportunity to do a trade when we can
both benefit from it.  I want to use the water tower and they want a
wireless link.  In the long run, the use of the tower will surpass the value
of that link.  Their short term savings is my long term gain.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 11:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto
Cruiser

Stop giving money away.  Stop putting your local government in a possition 
to have to spend MORE money.  Stop passing up chances to work as a team.

The city that we work with on this trades us for water tower space.  They 
spend no money and neither do we.  It works out perfectly.

We are the entrepreneurs guys, don't pass up an opportunity to do cool 
things for people just because someone else can already do it.  We can give 
them higher speeds at lower prices.

marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "3-dB Networks" 
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto

Cruiser


> IMHO, the only way to do something like this where the office is mobile is
> with cellular service (although he will need to VPN back to the Police HQ)
> or to use a Mesh network designed for mobility (since 802.11G tends to 
> fall
> apart past 30MPH or so).
>
> Unless this city want's to make a major investment in Mesh... I'd tell him
> to stick with the cellular air cards (Verizon, AT&T, whatever) and be done
> with it.  Hacking together a solution is probably more effort than its
> worth, and there could be theoretical consequences if the network doesn't
> operate correctly.
>
> I'm still nowhere close to being able to offload this... but down the pipe

> I
> know of a city that is replacing their MOTOMESH Solo network with MOTOMESH
> Duo... so those nodes would probably be cheap... and it allows the cop 
> cards
> to go up to 144MPH in the Mesh and still stay connected (its actually 
> really
> cool technology developed for the US Military... but the most it can do is
> T1 speeds)
>
> Daniel White
> 3-dB Networks
> http://www.3dbnetworks.com
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>Behalf Of Robert West
>>Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 9:05 AM
>>To: WISPA General List
>>Subject: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station
>>to Cruiser
>>
>>I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little
>>spot
>>in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to
>>the
>>station network via a wireless link.  (He is the "Police Chief" but I
>>suspect he is also the entire police force)  He said that the local Wal-
>>Mart
>>has agreed to donate to him a few of those little Acer 7" screen
>>laptops,
>>which are a big piece of crap from the number of repairs we've had to do
>>on
>>them...  Anyhow, he wants to be able to be in the cruiser and connect to
>>the
>>network back at the station and use the websites from the Attorney
>>General's
>>office where he can run plates, drivers license info and also fill out
>>his
>>reports.
>>
>>
>>
>>Here's the setup..
>>
>>
>>
>>This Burg is a bit less than 2 miles long and about one and a half miles
>>wide.  The town hall is equivalent to a 4 story building and they also
>>have
>>a water tower that looks to be 100 foot tall.  The terrain is flat as
>>can be
>>and they have the normal scattering of trees.  The Town Hall and water
>>tower
>>are the tallest structures by far aside from a large grain elevator
>>right
>>outside of town.  Boy wants to connect to his network anywhere in town
>>from
>>his cop-mobile as well as when he is at home, also within the town.
>>
>>
>>
>>We've done plenty of private networks but it's all been in the 2.4 and
>>5ghz
>>band.  He was thinking he could just throw up a 2.4ghz link and be good
>>but
>>I told him to hold on, I didn't think he could broadcast the Attorney
>>Generals network to every antenna in town, I had to do some research.
>>So
>>this, because of my utterly blatant laziness, is my research. J
>>
>>
>>
>>Has anyone been down this path?  What can we do and not do?
>>
>>
>>
>>I have a meeting with the guy next Wednesday and want to have some idea
>>of
>>what we're up against on this one.  (Hopefully he doesn't recognize me
>>as
>>the guy who took him to court over a ticket he wrote for a crooked
>>license
>>plate...  I won that one by the way)
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>>
>>Robert West
>>
>>Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
>>
>>740-335-7020
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>>

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Robert West
Like a sticky?  Maybe.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:02 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have

I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real 
talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which 
just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to 
list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a 
description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware, 
software etc ... you would like to share with the group.

I'll start:

what: EZRJ-45 connector system
where: www.ezrj45.com
why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I 
find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a 
CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite 
ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can 
verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the 
tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that 
cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time 
saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an 
Ethernet plug since I started using this system.

Mike






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Frank Crawford
They do. 
http://www.telephoneparts.com/index.cgi?pcode=PLT-100020-010&placement=1

Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as well.
>
> marlon
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Mike" 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have
>
>
>   
>> I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
>> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
>> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
>> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
>> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
>> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>>
>> I'll start:
>>
>> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
>> where: www.ezrj45.com
>> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
>> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
>> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
>> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
>> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
>> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
>> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
>> saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
>> Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
>> 
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [FCC Committee] sub 3.7 gig spectrum, comments needed was -- Re: FCC Chairman JuliusGenachowskiAnnouncesSeniorStaff for Development of NationalBroadband Plan

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer

- Original Message - 
From: "Stephen Coran" 
To: 
Cc: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: [FCC Committee] sub 3.7 gig spectrum,comments needed was -- Re: 
FCC Chairman JuliusGenachowskiAnnouncesSeniorStaff for Development of 
NationalBroadband Plan


> It would be contrary to WISPA's previous views in the TV white spaces
> proceeding to now endorse sensing.

Yeah.  Our ORIGINAL stance DID support sensing though.

Either way, we could support sensing as an underlay mechanism across a 
larger part of the spectrum and not hurt the Whitespaces issue.

>
> The draft Outline I'm working on advocates a spectrum audit to determine
> where spectrum is underutilized and where it can be made available more
> efficiently.

That's a tricky one though.  I know that in the past Steve Stroh had told us 
that all of an "educational TV band" 2.5 or something like that, was 
broadcasting the same show, at the same time.  Just as place holders so that 
when the FCC showed up with their spectrum anlyzers the channels showed "in 
use".  Just asking people who's using what will not likely be productive for 
us, we've seen how much money will be spent on spectrum squatting 
mechanisms, let along spectrum purchasing mechanisms.

>  Perhaps that's the 900 MHz band.  Very important to keep
> in mind: the FCC is looking for hard data, not anecdotes, so broad
> claims about the lack of paging systems, hoarding of Part 101 spectrum,
> etc., will not be considered credible and, in fact, might detract from
> WISPA's overall message.  I'd rather let others who have the time and
> resources make the case about underutilization in other bands and simply
> support the idea of spectrum audits.

I disagree with that.  At least for rural markets (this seems to be where 
the focus is anyway).

Our job is to tell them what we think we need as the industry moves forward. 
They may say yes, they may say no.  But to not even ask is an automatic no. 
And asking does no harm.

marlon

>
> There's a lot more to the Outline that I've sent to Jack.  I am waiting
> for input from him (he worked into the wee hours on this last night)
> and, once its in good shape, I'm sure there will be an opportunity for
> FCC committee input, beyond the contributions that have already been
> posted in response to Jack's earlier post.
>
>
> Stephen E. Coran
> Rini Coran, PC
> 1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600
> Washington, D.C. 20036
> 202.463.4310 - voice
> 202.669.3288 - cell
> 202.296.2014 - fax
> sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail
> www.rinicoran.com
> www.telecommunicationslaw.com
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
> and may be protected by legal privilege.  If you are not the intended
> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use
> of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited.  If you have received
> this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to
> the sender and deleting or destroying the e-mail and any attachments
> without retaining any copies.  Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements
> imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in
> this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or
> written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
> penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing
> or recommending to another party any matter addressed herein.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: fcccommittee-boun...@wispa.org
> [mailto:fcccommittee-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 10:00 AM
> To: fcccommit...@wispa.org
> Cc: WISPA General List
> Subject: [FCC Committee] sub 3.7 gig spectrum,comments needed was -- Re:
> FCC Chairman Julius GenachowskiAnnouncesSeniorStaff for Development of
> National Broadband Plan
>
> Hmmm, I thought that there was one with something like 100 questions on
> it.
> I must have my issues mixed up.
>
> Anyway here's an idea that I think is worth of discussion.
>
> I think we should toss out the idea that sensing mechanisms should be
> allowed so that ANY open frequencies can be used.
>
> A couple of easy examples would be 2.5 ghz bands.  Those are NOT used in
> large parts of the country.  Today's wifi chips will go up to those
> frequencies with a firmware change!  Wifi already has a listen before
> talking mechanism.  It shouldn't be impossible to add a little bit of
> intelligence and coordination to the mechanism and allow a nearly free
> expansion of the 2.4 gig wifi band.
>
> The same could be said for 900mhz.  Most of what's on either side of it
> is paging systems.  Yet many paging systems are long gone now,
> especially in rural areas.  Why not open up the bands on an as available
> basis?
>
> If we can convince the FCC to allow these types of mechanism we could
> have a unlicensed underlay that g

Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Yeah, those are awesome.  I wish they had shielded connectors as well.

marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "Mike" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have


>I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real
> talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which
> just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to
> list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a
> description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware,
> software etc ... you would like to share with the group.
>
> I'll start:
>
> what: EZRJ-45 connector system
> where: www.ezrj45.com
> why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I
> find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a
> CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite
> ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can
> verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the
> tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that
> cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time
> saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an
> Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link fromStationto Cruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Yeppers.  HIPA is the same thing.  It's NOT the responsibility of the 
transport mechanism.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: 
To: "Robert West" ; "'WISPA General List'" 

Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link fromStationto 
Cruiser


> Yeah. We would dump this right in their lap and outline that the system is 
> strictly for transporting data. Data security is their responsibility.
>
> We do the same thing in the banking and health care industry.
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Robert West" 
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:05:05
> To: ; 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from 
> Stationto Cruiser
>
> Yeah, that's the part I was leery of when he asked.  I knew there were 
> some
> sort of safeguards that had to be followed and I'm totally green in that
> area.  We've done a few medical sites that had to be HIPPA compliant and 
> it
> wasn't such a big deal but I hate messing with the cops.  They have other
> ways to complain other than not paying an invoice.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of lakel...@gbcx.net
> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 1:49 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from 
> Stationto
> Cruiser
>
> Be careful of the new federal encryption requirements for anything hooked 
> up
> to the National Crime Computers.
>
> A lot of states have new rules also when interfacing to the state DMV and
> crime networks
>
> Just FYI
>
> -B-
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jayson Baker 
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:37:26
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station
> to Cruiser
>
> We currently do this for a local PD.  They have 13 of those ruggedized 
> Dell
> laptops, mounted in all the cars.
> We looked at 2.4GHz and 900MHz.  Even though the town is only 5sqmi, we
> decided to go with Verizon Aircards.
>
> Worked out well, because the laptops are tied directly into their CAD
> system, which is tied into the whole state.
> So now they could, theoretically, go anywhere in the state and be 
> dispatched
> on a call, run plates/people through NCIC, etc.
>
> I believe that because of that, they actually got the state to pay for a 
> lot
> of it.
>
> Sure, we don't make anything on the Verizon service, but we do on the
> backend by tying their CAD into the Internet.
>
> Just something to keep in mind, if you have any sort of 3G service in that
> area.
>
> Jayson
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Robert West
> wrote:
>
>> I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little 
>> spot
>> in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to 
>> the
>> station network via a wireless link.  (He is the "Police Chief" but I
>> suspect he is also the entire police force)  He said that the local
>> Wal-Mart
>> has agreed to donate to him a few of those little Acer 7" screen laptops,
>> which are a big piece of crap from the number of repairs we've had to do
> on
>> them...  Anyhow, he wants to be able to be in the cruiser and connect to
>> the
>> network back at the station and use the websites from the Attorney
>> General's
>> office where he can run plates, drivers license info and also fill out 
>> his
>> reports.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the setup..
>>
>>
>>
>> This Burg is a bit less than 2 miles long and about one and a half miles
>> wide.  The town hall is equivalent to a 4 story building and they also
> have
>> a water tower that looks to be 100 foot tall.  The terrain is flat as can
>> be
>> and they have the normal scattering of trees.  The Town Hall and water
>> tower
>> are the tallest structures by far aside from a large grain elevator right
>> outside of town.  Boy wants to connect to his network anywhere in town
> from
>> his cop-mobile as well as when he is at home, also within the town.
>>
>>
>>
>> We've done plenty of private networks but it's all been in the 2.4 and
> 5ghz
>> band.  He was thinking he could just throw up a 2.4ghz link and be good
> but
>> I told him to hold on, I didn't think he could broadcast the Attorney
>> Generals network to every antenna in town, I had to do some research.  So
>> this, because of my utterly blatant laziness, is my research. J
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone been down this path?  What can we do and not do?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a meeting with the guy next Wednesday and want to have some idea 
>> of
>> what we're up against on this one.  (Hopefully he doesn't recognize me as
>> the guy who took him to court over a ticket he wrote for a crooked 
>> license
>> plate...  I won that one by the way)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert West
>>
>> Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
>>
>> 740-335-7020
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto Cruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Stop giving money away.  Stop putting your local government in a possition 
to have to spend MORE money.  Stop passing up chances to work as a team.

The city that we work with on this trades us for water tower space.  They 
spend no money and neither do we.  It works out perfectly.

We are the entrepreneurs guys, don't pass up an opportunity to do cool 
things for people just because someone else can already do it.  We can give 
them higher speeds at lower prices.

marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "3-dB Networks" 
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Stationto 
Cruiser


> IMHO, the only way to do something like this where the office is mobile is
> with cellular service (although he will need to VPN back to the Police HQ)
> or to use a Mesh network designed for mobility (since 802.11G tends to 
> fall
> apart past 30MPH or so).
>
> Unless this city want's to make a major investment in Mesh... I'd tell him
> to stick with the cellular air cards (Verizon, AT&T, whatever) and be done
> with it.  Hacking together a solution is probably more effort than its
> worth, and there could be theoretical consequences if the network doesn't
> operate correctly.
>
> I'm still nowhere close to being able to offload this... but down the pipe 
> I
> know of a city that is replacing their MOTOMESH Solo network with MOTOMESH
> Duo... so those nodes would probably be cheap... and it allows the cop 
> cards
> to go up to 144MPH in the Mesh and still stay connected (its actually 
> really
> cool technology developed for the US Military... but the most it can do is
> T1 speeds)
>
> Daniel White
> 3-dB Networks
> http://www.3dbnetworks.com
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>Behalf Of Robert West
>>Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 9:05 AM
>>To: WISPA General List
>>Subject: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station
>>to Cruiser
>>
>>I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little
>>spot
>>in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to
>>the
>>station network via a wireless link.  (He is the "Police Chief" but I
>>suspect he is also the entire police force)  He said that the local Wal-
>>Mart
>>has agreed to donate to him a few of those little Acer 7" screen
>>laptops,
>>which are a big piece of crap from the number of repairs we've had to do
>>on
>>them...  Anyhow, he wants to be able to be in the cruiser and connect to
>>the
>>network back at the station and use the websites from the Attorney
>>General's
>>office where he can run plates, drivers license info and also fill out
>>his
>>reports.
>>
>>
>>
>>Here's the setup..
>>
>>
>>
>>This Burg is a bit less than 2 miles long and about one and a half miles
>>wide.  The town hall is equivalent to a 4 story building and they also
>>have
>>a water tower that looks to be 100 foot tall.  The terrain is flat as
>>can be
>>and they have the normal scattering of trees.  The Town Hall and water
>>tower
>>are the tallest structures by far aside from a large grain elevator
>>right
>>outside of town.  Boy wants to connect to his network anywhere in town
>>from
>>his cop-mobile as well as when he is at home, also within the town.
>>
>>
>>
>>We've done plenty of private networks but it's all been in the 2.4 and
>>5ghz
>>band.  He was thinking he could just throw up a 2.4ghz link and be good
>>but
>>I told him to hold on, I didn't think he could broadcast the Attorney
>>Generals network to every antenna in town, I had to do some research.
>>So
>>this, because of my utterly blatant laziness, is my research. J
>>
>>
>>
>>Has anyone been down this path?  What can we do and not do?
>>
>>
>>
>>I have a meeting with the guy next Wednesday and want to have some idea
>>of
>>what we're up against on this one.  (Hopefully he doesn't recognize me
>>as
>>the guy who took him to court over a ticket he wrote for a crooked
>>license
>>plate...  I won that one by the way)
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>>
>>Robert West
>>
>>Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
>>
>>740-335-7020
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>>
>>
>>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://

Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

2009-10-18 Thread Tom DeReggi
Otard is just for property under the control of the subscriber, such as when 
selling residential service to a residential house.

I sell primarilly to commerical property locations, such as Condos and 
Multi-tenant buildings, where the roofs and risers are not covered under 
Otard.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Faisal Imtiaz" 
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right


>I am confused:
>
>
> What happend to the rights granted under the FCC  "OTARD" rules for a
> wirless antenna installed ?
>
> --
>
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Computer Office Solutions Inc. /SnappyDSL.net
> Ph: (305) 663-5518 x 232
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:47 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>
> Actually, from that perspective "LEGAL" right could be a good thing, and
> better if expanded
>
> I want to put an antenna on the roof, and its the only way to get 
> broadband
> there, and the property manager says "no".
> I now say "YOU need to let me because its my legal right to have it". I'll
> legally force you to allow me, or buy me an alternative.
>
> What it really needs to read is "Americans have the LEGAL RIGHT to 
> Broadband
> of CHOICE".  Now that would be a good thing for competition..
> Or "Americans have Legal Right to BRoadband of Choice, without excessive
> fees charged by third parties at a rate higher than they'd charge other
> broadband providers for delivering broadband."
>
> Could you imaging if Wireless PRoviders could pull Roof easements with the
> same power as ILECs pull ground easements?
>
> If I had a $1 for every propoerty owner that would not allow me to deploy
> broadband to an inquiring  prospect, I'd be a millionaire.
> Or atleast my sales reps wouldn't always get discouraged and quit.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert West" 
> To: "'WISPA General List'" 
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>
>
>> Yeah.  A legal right.  In that case, I ground my son from that damn Maple
>> Story he plays hours on end and he calls children's services because I
>> violated his legal rights...
>>
>> What other things do I have the "legal right" to that I don't have, I
>> wonder...
>>
>> This is that Entitlement crap again.  I'm entitled to fresh water,
>> nutritious and healthy food, safe place to live,  100mb download speed
>> internet, blah, blah, blah.  Bunch of babies.
>>
>> Bob-
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Chuck Bartosch
>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:12 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Robert West wrote:
>>
>>> I can see somewhere in the near future, after all major technologies
>>> converge into devices that run on whatever version of the "internet"
>>> we will
>>> have at that time, that this would be a feasible argument however at
>>> this
>>> moment and probably in the next 10 years the vast majority of us
>>> will be
>>> able to live and survive perfectly fine with no internet.
>>>
>>> I don't understand the 1mg limit for the human right.
>>
>> Keep in mind, it's a *legal* right (soon) in Finland, not a human
>> right. People are conflating the French decree with Finland's.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>>  Most information,
>>> other than video, can be had at mere dial up speed.  How would slower
>>> internet speeds be the difference between life or death?
>>>
>>> My 15 year old.
>>>
>>> "Dad!  If I can't see the Whack-a-kitty video on YouTube I'm just
>>> gonna
>>> die!"
>>>
>>> Okay, that much I DO understand.
>>>
>>> Bob-
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>>> On
>>> Behalf Of David Hulsebus
>>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:44 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right
>>>
>>> FYI
>>>
>>> From SANS Newsbites Vol. 11 Num. 82 : Broadband Internet Access Deemed
>>> a Legal Right
>>>
>>> --Finland Declares 1Mb Broadband Access a Legal Right
>>> (October 14 & 15, 2009)
>>> The Finnish government has enacted a law making 1Mb broadband Internet
>>> access a legal right.  The law will take effect in July 2010.  The
>>> country may eventually guarantee its citizens the right to 100Mb
>>> broadband connections.  Finland's Transport and Communications
>>> Ministry
>>> spokesperson Laura Vikkonen was quoted as saying that "

Re: [WISPA] Broadband Internet Access Deemed a Legal Right

2009-10-18 Thread Tom DeReggi
Brad,

First, I was being Facetious , I thought that would have been obvious.

Second, Forgive the "generalized steriotypic" comment, as I did not mean to 
bundle all property managers/ owner into the same class.  Many property 
Owners do "get it", and we embrace their allegience and we work with them 
effectively. When I say negative things about PRoperty owners/managers, I am 
only referring to the percentage of clueless property mamangers that just 
dont get it, and that have shown to be both destructuve to themselves, their 
tenants, and our company's progress, because they cant open their mind to 
new ways of thinking.

Third, I have been in this business for 10 years now, and it took a while, 
but I've gotten to the point, that I pretty much have it down to a system 
how to work with the local property managers /owners as effectively as 
possible. BUT it was a long hard road to get here. It wasn't so easy the 
first few years. Admittedly, that actually works to my advantage now because 
we have LOTS of good relationships with PRoperty owners, that will be very 
difficult for new entrants to try and replicate equally.

Fourth, My strategy has always been to look from the eyes of the property 
owner, understand their position, and find ways to allie property owners and 
manager, not fight them. In otherwords, how to make them your friend. There 
are many ways to acommplish the goal, but again, it was NOT a fast process 
to change the mind set of property owners in teh early years. It took 
persistance, and a 5 year history of proof to lay in front of them, to 
compare how property managers benefited or lost dependant on whether they 
had embraced our wireless broadband partnerships or not.

Fifth, My frustration had always stemmed from the fact that 50% of our 
revenue to date went to Property owner, and they generally dont do jack 
squat other than delay the time it takes me to install subscribers. They do 
control valuable roof assets, which is why they sometimes get paid by me. 
It makes me laugh, when I hear consumers screaming for 30-50mbps for $25 
/month broadband service, when I am often forced to pay Property 
owners/managers way more than that.  I dont really have a propblem with what 
Proiperty owners charge, as long as its a fair competitive market, and I can 
charge my end users adequate fees to recoupe my costs that I pay property 
managers.  BUT in talking National Broadband Plan, where there is a goal to 
lower customer's costs and raise their speed, One of the most effective 
things the FCC/Feds can do is lower the cost ISP's ahve to gain access to 
tower assets.

Sixth- It is important to understand that all markets are nto the same, DC 
Metro is a very ruthless market when it comes to gaining roof access.  In 
rural America the problem may be special access costs (RBOC?), but in Metro 
areas, we tade that problem for property owners that all want their peice of 
the action. I hear stories of many WISPs that barter most of their tower 
colocation, with very little cost for that. Or I hear stories where people 
can erect their own towers for a few thousant dollars. Or bought the land to 
build their tower for a few thousand. These things just aren;t that common 
here in DC.  We live in a world of $17,000 Special exception permit 
applications. We live in the world of maximum broadband provider 
competitions, where roof managers try to give roof rights go to the highest 
bidder, and never really want to give it, because of the possibilty for a 
future hiugher bidder. And everyone wants Comast and Fios in the building, 
because the Public is most aware of these companies. Often these companies 
will refuse to come, if a third party ISP has been given rights to the 
building with signfiicant market share, abd Property owners are hesitent to 
select a small provider in fear they will retrict what the consumer may want 
more. But there are hundreds of scenarios, and they give the property owner 
the upper hand in negotiation. It takes a lot of creativity to get around 
the barriers..

Seventh, In the early year 1 out of 9 closed sales were prevented due to 
property management easement issues. Today, 9 out of 10 close sales, 
actually get installed, because we've learned how to better work with 
property owners, and target the locatiosn where we are successful.  But its 
still a problem. And until a Wireless provider will have the same rights for 
rooftops, that an ILEC utility has for the ground, we will never be able to 
compete on equal ground, at the price points that The FEds and Public are 
asking and dreaming for.

This is a big problem for us in public policy. ILECs can get 100% coverage, 
third party ISPs and WISPs dont have the legal rights to gain access to the 
resources to reach 100% of consumer. And the county and states dont have the 
power to give access to it either because they dont own most of the land 
that right-of-ways or Easements are needed.

But its why I have a big

Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station toCruiser

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
We've worked with Butch to design a mobile MT system.  It'll roam from tower 
to tower, even use the open linksys, netgear, etc. systems.  Handles all of 
the IP address issues on the fly.  Short outages only when moving from one 
tower to the next.

It's not working perfectly for us yet, but we just did the real world 
deployment on the first two units.  I think Butch has a number of them in 
more controlled situations working nicely.

laters,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "Robert West" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 8:05 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station 
toCruiser


>I got a call Friday afternoon from the police chief of a small little spot
> in the road asking about the possibility of connecting his cruisers to the
> station network via a wireless link.  (He is the "Police Chief" but I
> suspect he is also the entire police force)  He said that the local 
> Wal-Mart
> has agreed to donate to him a few of those little Acer 7" screen laptops,
> which are a big piece of crap from the number of repairs we've had to do 
> on
> them...  Anyhow, he wants to be able to be in the cruiser and connect to 
> the
> network back at the station and use the websites from the Attorney 
> General's
> office where he can run plates, drivers license info and also fill out his
> reports.
>
>
>
> Here's the setup..
>
>
>
> This Burg is a bit less than 2 miles long and about one and a half miles
> wide.  The town hall is equivalent to a 4 story building and they also 
> have
> a water tower that looks to be 100 foot tall.  The terrain is flat as can 
> be
> and they have the normal scattering of trees.  The Town Hall and water 
> tower
> are the tallest structures by far aside from a large grain elevator right
> outside of town.  Boy wants to connect to his network anywhere in town 
> from
> his cop-mobile as well as when he is at home, also within the town.
>
>
>
> We've done plenty of private networks but it's all been in the 2.4 and 
> 5ghz
> band.  He was thinking he could just throw up a 2.4ghz link and be good 
> but
> I told him to hold on, I didn't think he could broadcast the Attorney
> Generals network to every antenna in town, I had to do some research.  So
> this, because of my utterly blatant laziness, is my research. J
>
>
>
> Has anyone been down this path?  What can we do and not do?
>
>
>
> I have a meeting with the guy next Wednesday and want to have some idea of
> what we're up against on this one.  (Hopefully he doesn't recognize me as
> the guy who took him to court over a ticket he wrote for a crooked license
> plate...  I won that one by the way)
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
>
>
> Robert West
>
> Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
>
> 740-335-7020
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Simultaneous connections

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
I use an MT unit at my house for my personal connection.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "Al Stewart" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Simultaneous connections


> Thanks Tom ...
>
> I know some of the cheaper wireless routers on our system have been
> causing speed problems for various reasons. And I can see the reasons
> for the problems. But for most people, I guess a router is a router,
> and they don't want to spend big bucks.
>
> For myself, I'm looking to replace my own personal D-Link DI-704P
> (wired) with another wired unit. Researching models gives all kinds
> of conflicting info/complaints/recommendations. Someone here
> recommended, so I guess I'll see what I can track down on that.
>
> Al
>
> -- At 05:54 PM 10/16/2009 -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote: ---
>
>>Yes they can be the cause for numerous reasons.
>>
>>1) they can start to go flaky, and when gone flaky they can cause hesitent
>>throughput, (sorta like when a CPU overheats, or when a bus or cache limit
>>gets exceeded) that will force TCPIP congestion to slow throughput.  Its 
>>not
>>uncommon to have cases where we replace a router with another of the same
>>brand/model and the speed testing improves by 4x. BUT when this happens it
>>is because the product had become defective, not because the unit wasn't
>>originally capable..
>>
>>2) a 10mbps port does not guarantee that a route can push 10mbps. 10mbps 
>>is
>>just the speed of the NIC itself. Many cheaper or older generation routers
>>have very slow processors and can slow down with small packet traffic. Not
>>just processors but memory and bus design. Also, all firmwares might not 
>>be
>>optimize for higher speeds. For example, for GB you might want large 
>>network
>>buffers, where as routers that were developed at the day of 1mbps max DSL,
>>may have optimized for the typic speed, and used fewer buffers to conserve
>>RAM, and use less ram to lower costs.
>>
>>However, MOST routers of current generation are pretty capable, and 
>>usually
>>do fine up at higher speeds.  Also be cautious of using a VPN router,
>>because it can take quite a bit of overhead to encrypt or compress the
>>tunnel, and could get slowed at high speed.  The best thing to do is to
>>certify the peak speed of any Router that you plan to use regularly. Dont
>>believe the Spec sheet, believe your own Iperf test results.
>>
>>The issue is how do you tell if a router is flaking out and how can you 
>>test
>>the router's capabilty remotely if a support call arises?
>>If you dont have a way to test certify it working to spec, how do you know
>>it is?
>>
>>This is why we tend to use more power routers when we can. We like them to
>>have processor powerful enough to run full speed throughput tests directly
>>to the router.
>>In other words, A router can always pass much more traffic speeds through
>>it, than it can actuallu hald directly to or from it.  Having fast
>>processors in the routers, creating extra headroom, gets aroud this 
>>problem.
>>
>>
>>Tom DeReggi
>>RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>>IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Al Stewart" 
>>To: "WISPA General List" 
>>Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:30 PM
>>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Simultaneous connections
>>
>>
>> > Thanks ... this helps.
>> >
>> > One more question. Do routers being used by the subscribers (wired or
>> > wireless) ever affect the speed/bandwidth. I don't see how that can
>> > be as they are designed to pass 10 Meg to the WAN, which is six times
>> > at least what the
>> > nominal bandwidth would be. One tech guy is trying to blame routers
>> > for all problems. But I have yet to see the logic in that. Unless of
>> > course one is malfunctioning or dying or something. But that can't be
>> > ALL the routers in the system.
>> >
>> > Al
>> >
>> > -- At 02:15 PM 10/15/2009 -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote: ---
>> >
>> >>Everything goes to crap, unless you've put in bandwdith management to
>> >>address those conditions.
>> >>The problem gets worse when  Traffic becomes... Lots of small packets
>> >>and/or
>> >>lots of uploads.
>> >>Obviously Peer-to-Peer can have those characteristics.
>> >>The bigger problem is NOT fairly sharing bandwidith per sub, but 
>> >>instead
>> >>managing based on what percentage of bandwidth is going up versus down.
>> >>This can be a problem when Bandwdith mangement is Full Duplex, and 
>> >>Radios
>> >>are Half Duplex, and its never certain whether end user traffic is 
>> >>gfoing
>> >>to
>> >>be up or down during the congestion time.
>> >>Generally congestion will happen in teh upload direction more, because 
>> >>its
>> >>common practice to assume majority of bandwidth use is in teh download
>> >>direction, so most providers allocate more bandwdith for download.
>> >>Therfore
>> >>when there is an unsuspecting surge in upload bandwdith, the limited
>> >>amount
>> >>of upload capacity gets saturated sooner.
>>

Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy....

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Speaking of longer links.  I see people run the same size antennas on all of 
their installs far too often.

I've seen 19dB panels on links that can't be less than 10 to 12 miles.  I 
see 24dB grids on 1 mile links.

Here is my rule of thumb.  It'll have to change based on YOUR hardware etc. 
I'm always shooting for that -65 to -75 signal level, at BOTH ends of the 
link.

up to 5 miles, 15dB
up to 8 miles, 19dB
over 8 miles, 24dB grid.

On some of our 5 gig I have gone as high as a 3' dish for a customer on a 
ptmp system.  He's around 15 miles from the tower and gets a steady 3/2 
megs.  The max that his Alvarion VL unit will allow.  Pretty cool stuff.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "Mike" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy


> Reading with interest this thread and especially Marlon's take.
>
> I have seen power lines in the Fresnel zone play havoc with a
> signal.  Especially when the wind blows.  I have found the same thing
> regarding placement of the radio.  Many times a few feet one way or
> another just works.  I liken it to the black magic of radio propagation.
>
> The -60 signal in question CAN be too hot like Marlon intimated.  His
> analysis of the multi-path is probably right on.
>
> I don't know what your atmospherics are right now, but this is always
> the dreaded time of year for me.  It has been raining for the past
> several days.  It's colder than usual, and there has been some
> ducting going on.  The leaves are dead on the trees and soaking up
> that moisture.
>
> Installs where I am using knife edge diffraction as a propagation
> medium aren't as hot as they were a couple weeks ago.  The hill I am
> shooting over has tall grass that is all wet now.  The row of trees a
> mile away I'm shooting over are full of moisture and not diffracting
> the signal like it was this summer.
>
> OK, for some of the voodoo science all this entails, here are some
> basic observations I've made regarding some of these problem installs.
>
> Trees or power lines in the near field that move and are in the
> Fresnel zone can kill throughput.  The signal may look hot, but they
> can drop packets like mad.
>
> Using knife edge diffraction, G seems to work better than B;
> horizontal better than vertical.
>
> Sometimes off pointing an antenna slightly can attenuate a secondary
> multi-path signal.
>
> Always leave a service loop coiled behind an install.  CAT5
> stretchers are very expensive.  It's much easier to make one shorter if 
> needed.
>
> I endeavor to make the signal reciprocal, or within 3dB at each
> end.  An alligator station will do nothing except add RF pollution.
>
> When doing an install, if possible, I carry a spare long CAT5 cable
> and a throw away laptop.  I try to find the sweet spot before I tack
> anything down.
>
> Like I said, many times this whole thing smacks of black magic.
>
> I had a woman call me once from *WAY* too far away.  I said, OK, I am
> going to turn on the light on the tower, tell me if you see it.  "I
> see it," she said.  Incredulous, and slightly bored, I told her I was
> going to turn it off and tell me when it goes off.  I waited several
> seconds and turned off the light.  "Ok, it's off she said."  Now I
> was sitting up and taking notes.  I asked her to tell me when it goes
> back on.  She told me.  I thought it was absolutely incredible that
> she could see my tower from where she was.  She wanted to move into
> this old farmhouse, and wasn't going to do it unless she could get
> Internet access.  Guess what?  She's one of my most vocal and
> supportive customers and is almost 12 miles away.
>
> Mike
>
> At 08:44 AM 10/16/2009, Marlon wrote:
>>Is that a bigger or smaller antenna size than what you have now?
>>
>>If you moved up by 10' and increased your signal levels, what 1000% or so,
>>I'd REALLY say that this is looking like a multipath issue.
>>
>>Often with multipath I've seen the signals hold well but performance suck.
>>It'll sometimes kill the signal though.
>>
>>I had one install that has some power lines in the way.  Fought 
>>intermittent
>>outages etc. for over a year.  His signal was OK, but not great.  Finally
>>something changes a bit and his signal dropped too low.
>>
>>Hmmm, bad radio.  So I pulled his radio out and put in a brand new one,
>>still crappy signal.
>>
>>Double hm
>>
>>I put the old radio back in, left it off the mount and moved it around to
>>see what would happen.  (I always leave 6 to 10' of cable on the mount 
>>just
>>for things like this.)
>>
>>Triple hm
>>
>>Move the radio to the west 6' and DOWN 2' and he's got great signal, 
>>faster
>>speeds than ever and is happy as a clam.  Now one of my biggest PITA
>>customers just never calls anymore.  It was a very amazing transformation 
>>to
>>his service.
>>
>>Again, there were some powerlines *close* to the path but not in it. 
>>Things
>>actually looked pretty good to me.  B

Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy....

2009-10-18 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
I don't Steve.

But think of it like an echo.  You get that first, clear signal coming in, 
laser straight.  Then at some point shortly after that you start getting the 
reflections.  If there are too many of them, and/or they are at the wrong 
time the radio will get confused.

G SHOULD handle this better than B.  It's made to use multipath's echoes to 
reassemble a complete message.  Sometimes it works that way, sometimes it 
doesn't.

I'd have to say, for me, g is usually better with multipath than b though. 
B handles interference better.  At least that's what I'm seeing.  I have a 
tower that was giving 1 meg down 2 to 3 up, almost all customers saw that or 
worse.  Swapped back to b mode only and it's now a consistent 4 megs both 
ways.

Another thing to try is to turn down the power.  Probably on both ends.  If 
you are at -69 see if you can drop your ap by 5 then 5 more db.  Make sure 
to drop the cpe by the same amount.  What you are trying to do is move the 
echo down so far that it can't be "heard".

I've also had installs that are happiest about 2' above the ground!

Here's a fun one for you.  I've got one customer that shoots near a grain 
elevator.  Most of the year he works fine, but near harvest, every year, his 
performance goes out the window.  It seems that the wheat in the elevator is 
moved out and the empty elevator is worse than the full one.

Out here we have VERY long links.  I have one at 18 miles.  PTMP.  Yet there 
are also customers within 1 mile.  10 to 15 mile links are common place. 
Multipath is a real head ache as the ground conditions change.  Customer's 
service will be perfect, until it snows.  Or until they harvest a field, or 
the ground dries out, or it rains etc.

Fortunately MOST of the time this isn't an issue.  But when it does hit ya, 
it can be very hard to figure out.

One other thing you might want to try with your customer, turn the radio to 
the wrong polarity.  You are very close to the tower so you should still 
have enough signal.  I've not had to do this very often, but it's a little 
trick that has worked before.  I've also pointed them 180* the wrong way and 
had that work very well, especially with a grid.

Let us know if anything helps.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "Steve Barnes" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy


> Marlon, DO you have or know of a good white paper on Multipath issues?  I 
> agree with your assessment but I have several locations that I have not 
> been able to resolve Multipath for.  I had an installation last week 3 
> miles from tower AP.  Clear line of site other than going over the 
> Neighbors Metal barn and between 4 metal grain bins. We could get a -69 On 
> 50% of the property but retries were 98% No matter where we tried High-Low 
> left right. 100 yards either way on the road and <10% retries and a -65 
> signal.  I just need to some documentation to solidify my understanding.
>
> Steve Barnes
> Manager
> PCS-WIN
> RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
>
> Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience 
> of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared, 
> ambition inspired, and success achieved.
> - Helen Keller
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:45 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving me crazy
>
> Is that a bigger or smaller antenna size than what you have now?
>
> If you moved up by 10' and increased your signal levels, what 1000% or so,
> I'd REALLY say that this is looking like a multipath issue.
>
> Often with multipath I've seen the signals hold well but performance suck.
> It'll sometimes kill the signal though.
>
> I had one install that has some power lines in the way.  Fought 
> intermittent
> outages etc. for over a year.  His signal was OK, but not great.  Finally
> something changes a bit and his signal dropped too low.
>
> Hmmm, bad radio.  So I pulled his radio out and put in a brand new one,
> still crappy signal.
>
> Double hm
>
> I put the old radio back in, left it off the mount and moved it around to
> see what would happen.  (I always leave 6 to 10' of cable on the mount 
> just
> for things like this.)
>
> Triple hm
>
> Move the radio to the west 6' and DOWN 2' and he's got great signal, 
> faster
> speeds than ever and is happy as a clam.  Now one of my biggest PITA
> customers just never calls anymore.  It was a very amazing transformation 
> to
> his service.
>
> Again, there were some powerlines *close* to the path but not in it. 
> Things
> actually looked pretty good to me.  But not to the radio.
>
> Your symptoms look like multipath to me.  We don't see it's effect very
> often, the systems handle it quite well today.  But when it hits it can 
> hit
> hard.
>
> laters,
> m

[WISPA] Gotta Have

2009-10-18 Thread Mike
I have learned a lot from this list.  I think there is some real 
talent lurking here.  We all have discovered certain things which 
just make life as a WISP easier.  I think it would be beneficial to 
list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a 
description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware, 
software etc ... you would like to share with the group.

I'll start:

what: EZRJ-45 connector system
where: www.ezrj45.com
why:  As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I 
find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a 
CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end.  This is a quite 
ingenious system.  The plugs have holes all the way through.  You can 
verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the 
tags.  It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that 
cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place.  Maybe not a time 
saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver.  I've not miswired an 
Ethernet plug since I started using this system.

Mike





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/