Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Who wifi vendors does everyone use?

[Matt O'Brien]

Feeling inadequate but we'll covered at Boise State with a mere 1400 ap
cisco deployment.
5000 6000 deployments are you meshing   students backpacks:) Wow that's
some square footage!

Matt,
On Mar 31, 2016 8:46 PM, "Julian Y Koh"  wrote:

> On Thu Mar 31 2016 21:31:37 CDT, "Whelan, Robert" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Northeastern is Aruba with over 3700 APs.
>
> Oh fine, I can't resist after that.
>
> Northwestern is Aruba with a little over 5000 APs.  :) :)
>
>
> --
> Julian Y. Koh
> Associate Director, Telecommunications and Network Services
> Northwestern Information Technology
>
> 2001 Sheridan Road #G-166
> Evanston, IL 60208
> +1-847-467-5780
> NUIT Web Site: 
> PGP Public Key:
>
> **
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Desktop projection to classroom display

[Matt O'Brien]

We have worked with multiple groups on campus to try and meet their needs
with various screen sharing solutions over the years. Over time our
Learning Technology group shifted focus and start looking for  a solution
that could meet the majority of users requirements/wants without
reinventing infrastructure. Last time we met them they were working on
vetting a screen sharing solution from Zoom https://zoom.us/ . So far they
seem happy and have asked for no Infrastructure changes. They are still
using it in select test case classrooms for now.

Matt,

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Ashfield, Matt (NBCC) <
matt.ashfi...@nbcc.ca> wrote:

> Good Morning
>
>
>
> Like I’m sure most of you have experienced, we are dealing with technology
> like AppleTVs and Chromecasts showing up in our classrooms and being asked
> to “make it work”. Obviously we run into the roadblocks of those devices
> not fitting into our network well, or working with certain OS’s, not to
> mention security implications.
>
>
>
> We’d like to try and standardize on a technology so we can manage it
> (ha!). I’m just wondering if anyone has solved this one yet?  We’ve looked
> briefly at AirParrot but wondering if anyone else has had any luck in this
> area.
>
>
>
> Any info/advice is appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Matt
>
> NBCC
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
>


-- 
Matt O'Brien
Associate Director, Network and Security
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC reliability

[Matt O'Brien]

Lee,
We have been using the HA 8510's since August. Early adopted 8.0 moved to
8.1 and have had no issues thus far with roughly 1000 AP's. We still have
some 5508's for housing and auxiliaries. The addition of 10gig ports on the
8510's really helped on high volume. We took a look at the bowing after it
was mentioned, our's Bow a bit as well.

Matt,

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu wrote:

  I saw the bowing thing- that’s insane. It makes me curious about the
 racks they are mounted in.



 To date, do you see the advantages of the 8510 as outweighing the concerns?





 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Williams, Matthew
 *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:46 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC
 reliability



 Lee,

 We’re going through this as we speak.  We’ve seen some issues with the
 controllers physically bowing.  We’ve also had issues with running HA via
 Layer-2 when upstream routing engines/supervisor cards fail.  Part of the
 issue is that there is very limited keep alive timer control in our version
 of code and the thresholds aren’t high enough to mitigate the route engines
 switching over.  Cisco recommends direct connecting them, so we’ve resorted
 to using switches as media converters for the direct connection.



 The good news is that 8.0.100 reintroduced timer controls that did
 mitigate the failures when using Layer2 for the HA.  The bad news is that
 8.0.100 caused watchdog failures in the 8510s.



 Respectfully,



 Matthew Williams

 IT Manager, Wireless

 Kent State University

 Office: (330) 672-7246

 Mobile: (330) 469-0445



 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
 mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Lee H Badman
 *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:35 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC
 reliability



 One more for the group: Having a large number of 5508s, I have an interest
 in greatly simplifying the environment by moving to higher capacity 8510s
 (zero interest in 5760s).



 I’m hoping to hear from those that have taken the 8510 plunge. For us,
 outside of code issues, the 5508s have been solid hardware for us. Would
 like to know whether current 8510 users find them to be reliable as
 hardware, and whether the HA promises live up to the glossy.



 Thanks-



 Lee B.



 Lee Badman

 Wireless/Network Architect

 ITS, Syracuse University

 315.443.3003

 (Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com)







 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC reliability

[Matt O'Brien]

:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC
 reliability



 One more for the group: Having a large number of 5508s, I have an interest
 in greatly simplifying the environment by moving to higher capacity 8510s
 (zero interest in 5760s).



 I’m hoping to hear from those that have taken the 8510 plunge. For us,
 outside of code issues, the 5508s have been solid hardware for us. Would
 like to know whether current 8510 users find them to be reliable as
 hardware, and whether the HA promises live up to the glossy.



 Thanks-



 Lee B.



 Lee Badman

 Wireless/Network Architect

 ITS, Syracuse University

 315.443.3003

 (Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com)







 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC reliability

[Matt O'Brien]

We really like the 702s. I wish they would have been an option a few years
ago when we were adding full RF and density coverage in the dorms. They
would have saved a lot of time and money and kept us out of the hallway
deployment models in the bomb shelter construction dorms:)
On campus they are a great solution for those overlooked corner offices
stuck behind an elevator shaft and such.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Williams, Matthew mwill...@kent.edu
wrote:

  Matt,

 Thanks for the info.  How are the 702s working out?  We’re looking into
 them as well.



 Respectfully,



 Matthew Williams

 IT Manager, Wireless

 Kent State University

 Office: (330) 672-7246

 Mobile: (330) 469-0445



 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Matt O'Brien
 *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:42 PM

 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC
 reliability



 Matt,

 We never saw watchdog errors on 8.0. We moved to MR1 to take advantage of
 the trunk option on the 702w's. We held up on adding 702w's until we could
 assign different VLAN's to the switchports and keep the Users VLAN the
 same. It also came out at a convenient time, a couple weeks before the
 spring semester so we had time to look at it and move back to 8.0 if
 necessary.



 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Williams, Matthew mwill...@kent.edu
 wrote:

  Lee, any time.



 Kitri, the 10 minute time for a failure event to be triggered, the HA to
 become the primary, and the “failed” controller to come back up to a full
 Hot Standby has been consistent.  We’ve seen that the secondary controller
 has to reboot between two and three times before we have full SSO
 redundancy again.



 Matt, did you see any watchdog errors in 8.0?  What caused you to go with
 8.1?  Thanks.



 Respectfully,



 Matthew Williams

 IT Manager, Wireless

 Kent State University

 Office: (330) 672-7246

 Mobile: (330) 469-0445



 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Kitri Waterman
 *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:16 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU

 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC
 reliability



 Matt,

 You mentioned 10 min for full HA convergence which seems long. But then
 again, we've also seen a consistent issue where during an HA event the
 configs are reported as out of sync and the secondary controller has to
 reboot, sometimes more than once to re-sync.

 My current theory is that very dynamic parts of the configs like rogue
 adhoc alerts should be left out of the controller XML sync check and this
 would enable faster HA pairing.


 Kitri Waterman
 --
 Network Engineer (Wireless)
 University of Oregon


  On 2/19/15 11:58 AM, Williams, Matthew wrote:

 So far for us, I the benefits outweigh the risks.  In our case, when we
 failed one route engine the 8510s simply failed over to the HA box and
 there was no perceivable degradation in the user experience.  Our issues
 with using Layer-2 for the HA only occurred if BOTH of our upstream
 switches had a routing engine failure within the 10 minutes it takes for
 the full HA convergence time.  The odds of that happening at the same time
 are extremely remote and would most likely indicate a much larger
 networking issue that would trump a wireless outage.



 We chose to do the direct connection just to be extra safe.  In fact, the
 only reason we even found out about the routing engine issue was because we
 replaced routing engines in each of our upstream switches at roughly the
 same time.



 I don’t know how much testing you have done with the 8510s but we’ve run
 them through some pretty good paces.



 Respectfully,



 Matthew Williams

 IT Manager, Wireless

 Kent State University

 Office: (330) 672-7246

 Mobile: (330) 469-0445



 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
 mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Lee H Badman
 *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:49 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC
 reliability



 I saw the bowing thing- that’s insane. It makes me curious about the racks
 they are mounted in.



 To date, do you see the advantages of the 8510 as outweighing the concerns?





 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
 mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Williams, Matthew
 *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:46 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC
 reliability



 Lee,

 We’re going through this as we speak.  We’ve seen some issues with the
 controllers physically

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Airwave Support for Cisco Devices

[Matt O'Brien]

. 


 In addition, I was given contact information to get in touch with the
 Airwave Product Manger to talk about their support of the Cisco product
 line. While I have her attention I will make a plea for expanding the
 coverage of the Cisco WLCs to include many more of the available, and
 commonly used, controller options that are not currently settable (or
 monitored) by the AirWave product. We have three 2,500-device licenses for
 this product. I would certainly hate to have to abandon them due to lack of
 timely support for our constant growing and changing Cisco wireless
 infrastructure. We do not utilize the AirAirWave product to mange any of
 our Cisco switch gear.

 We started using the Airwave product before Aruba purchased them. Since
 that purchase the support for Cisco products has gradually decreased. I can
 understand that Aruba needs to put more effort into supporting their own
 product line than they do for their infrastructure competitors. However,
 they should still be able to properly support the Cisco product line. I
 still view the AirWave product as a better reporting tool others I have
 seen. And, a more intuitive interface too. I certainly hope I still feel
 this way in a year or two.

 I will pass anything that I find out that is particularly interesting
 regarding support for Cisco equipment along to the group.


 mailto:mtennef...@arubanetworks.com


 ==
 -jcw

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



-- 
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outside venues

[Matt O'Brien]

We have been using the power adapter listed above for our 1532's on pole
mounts with success. Essentially we place the power adapter in a NEMA box
and mount the radio to the outside of the NEMA box. The hard part for us is
all of our light poles run on photo cells so the existing power at the
light is not available during the day. We have to pull a separate power
feed to each pole.

Matt

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Hector J Rios hr...@lsu.edu wrote:

 The 1530s we have installed are in a single building. They were mounted
 directly on the exterior walls. So power was not an issue as we used PoE .
 We have not mounted any 1530s on poles yet.

 Have you looked at the AP adapter? I think this is what you need if you
 were to mount it to a pole.


 http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/access_point/1530/power/guide/1530pwradpt.html


 -Hector

 -Original Message-
 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ciesinski, Nick
 Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 5:08 PM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outside venues

 Hector,

 I am curious to know how you are connecting the 1530's to power.  We are
 right now all 155X's for the outdoor AP's but I was looking at the 1530's
 because their price point was better.  The one thing I was concerned with
 though was that they are DC power input vs AC power input.  For many
 locations we have the AP mounted on a building so this is ok but we have
 several in a mesh that connect to our parking lot light poles and I don't
 know the feasibility of putting a AD/DC converter in the power pole.
 Unless I missed it I also didn't see a outdoor rated converter Cisco sells
 for these. So I am curious to know your experience with powering them.

 Nick Ciesinski
 University of Wisconsin - Whitewater

 From: Hector J Rios hr...@lsu.edumailto:hr...@lsu.edu
 Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Date: Thursday, December 4, 2014 1:23 PM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outside venues

 We have used 1520s in the past and they have worked well. We recently
 installed a couple of 1530s with external antennas and their coverage is
 really good. The plus with the 1530s is their form-factor. The 1520s and
 the predecessors where tanks. The 1530s are considerably smaller. Depending
 on your requirements, the 1530s with internal antennas are very convenient,
 but you are not going to have as good of a coverage as the ones with the
 external antennas.

 Finally, consider additional costs for your outdoor deployment. A couple
 of years ago we deployed a good number of outdoor mesh radios and the
 expense for the power requirements was significant. Other costs to bear in
 mind are maintenance. If you hang these radios on poles, know that you will
 be needing a lift to get to those radios when they have issues. For us, our
 contractor charges a minimum of $500 to get us a bucket truck. And if you
 live in the southern states, just pray your radios don't have issues during
 the summer. Otherwise, bring lots of towels and prepare to sweat.

 Hector Rios
 Louisiana State University

 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Stooksberry, Tom
 Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:47 PM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outside venues

 I would like to ask what everyone is doing for their outdoor areas with
 respect to WiFi.  We have several very nice venues that would benefit from
 connectivity.  Some are relatively close to networked buildings and some
 are fairly remote from such structures. We are a Cisco shop and are
 thinking about installing some AP1532's but due diligence begs me to pick
 other brains for alternative and maybe better ideas.

 Tom Stooksberry
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco PI 2.2 upgrade

[Matt O'Brien]

We gave up on the upgrades a few versions ago. We have better luck building
a fresh VM with the new PI installed and restoring a backup from the old
version. The following has gotten past the licensing woes two times in a
row.

You will need to open a TAC ticket to Rehost the licenses on the new server
the trick is this open the ticket on line. Provide the VUID of the new
server and say you need to rehost the licenses on this VUID. Attach all the
existing license files to the ticket.

Matt,

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Vlade Ristevski vrist...@ramapo.edu
wrote:

  The licensing experience I had during those upgrades was the worst
 software related experience of my 14 year career.


 On 10/30/2014 10:08 AM, Michael Adams wrote:

  Ugh, how does Cisco continue to suck so badly at software. The whole
 multi-year migration from WCS to NCS to PI has been a nightmare.



 

 Michael Adams

 Network Administrator III



 WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY

 Information Technology





 *From:* Trent Hurt [mailto:trent.h...@louisville.edu
 trent.h...@louisville.edu]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:52 PM
 *Subject:* Cisco PI 2.2 upgrade



 No inline upgrade option for any version of PI




 http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/prime/infrastructure/2-2/quickstart/guide/cpi_qsg.html#pgfId-113783








 Sent from my iPhone

 --
 Wilmington University Mission

 Wilmington University is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of
 the curriculum, and individual attention to students. As an institution
 with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity
 for higher education to students of varying ages, interests, and
 aspirations.

 The university provides a range of exemplary career-oriented undergraduate
 and graduate degree programs for a growing and diverse student population.
 It delivers these programs at locations and times convenient to students
 and at an affordable price. A highly qualified full-time faculty works
 closely with part-time faculty drawn from the workplace to ensure that the
 university’s programs prepare students to begin or continue their career,
 improve their competitiveness in the job market, and engage in lifelong
 learning.


  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] iOS 8 drops tomorrow

[Matt O'Brien]

 a local caching appliance on your campus? We did a

  number of years ago, it was free, and greatly reduces the impact on

  our commodity internet while boosting update speeds significantly.

 

  I know Apple is starting to roll out their own CDN, but for now, there

  are a lot of companies besides Apple using Akamai, so it's worth it.

 

  We also just established free direct peering with Netflix. Big

  improvement there too.

 

  Jeff

 

  On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, in message

  1dc7671d-3395-41d4-907c-fb06281ad...@uiowa.edu

  mailto:1dc7671d-3395-41d4-907c-fb06281ad...@uiowa.edu
 1dc7671d-3395-41d4-907c-fb06281ad...@uiowa.edu, Johnson,

  Neil M neil-john...@uiowa.edu mailto:neil-john...@uiowa.edu wrote:

 

 

  We've add some additional bandwidth to the links between our wireless

  nets and campus in anticipation of heavy traffic tomorrow.

 

  -Neil

 

  --

  Neil Johnson

  Network Engineer

  The University of Iowa

  Phone: 319 384-0938

  Fax: 319 335-2951

  E-Mail: neil-john...@uiowa.edu mailto:neil-john...@uiowa.edu
 neil-john...@uiowa.edu

 

 

 

 

  **

  Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE

  Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

  http://www.educause.edu/groups/

 

  ** Participation and subscription information for this

  EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at

  http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 



 **

 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



 **

 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




 --
 Craig Eyre
 Network Analyst
 IT Services Department
 Mount Royal University
 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW
 Calgary AB T2P 3T5

 P. 403.440.5199
 E. ce...@mtroyal.ca

 The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of
 strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. Vincent
 T. Lombardi

 MRU IT Services or any legitimate organization will *NEVER* ask for your
 password. Never email or share your password with anyone..
  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 8.0 code released

[Matt O'Brien]

We are putting on a fresh pair of HA 8510's today and will move all our
outdoor wireless to it. We will keep the thread posted for any gotchas as
we migrate building AP's as well.

Matt,


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Anders Nilsson anders.nils...@adm.umu.se
wrote:

 Nobody remembers a coward!!!  ;)



 Cheers

 Anders



 *Från:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *För *Oliver Elliott
 *Skickat:* den 18 augusti 2014 14:59
 *Till:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Ämne:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 8.0 code released



 Now who's feeling brave enough to run this on production wism2s?!



 Oli



 On 18 August 2014 13:18, Trent Hurt trent.h...@louisville.edu wrote:


 http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn80.html





 --

 Oliver Elliott
 Network Specialist
 IT Services
 University of Bristol
 e: oliver.elli...@bristol.ac.uk
 t: 0117 92 (87861)

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.