[zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
Ive heard that WinFS is a filesystem that has some kind of database? I didnt understand the advantages because I havent read about it, but it is the best thing since sliced bread according to MS. My question is, because WinFS database is running on top of NTFS, could a similar thing be done for ZFS? Implement a database running on top of ZFS, that has similar functionality as WinFS? (I never understood the advantages of having a database on top of NTFS, maybe it would be pointless for ZFS? Can someone knowledgeable give some input to my question?) This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
Ive heard that WinFS is a filesystem that has some kind of database? I didnt understand the advantages because I havent read about it, but it is the best thing since sliced bread according to MS. My question is, because WinFS database is running on top of NTFS, could a similar thing be done for ZFS? Implement a database running on top of ZFS, that has similar functionality as WinFS? (I never understood the advantages of having a database on top of NTFS, maybe it would be pointless for ZFS? Can someone knowledgeable give some input to my question?) You should know that WinFS is simply a modified MS SQL Server with a passthrough to NTFS for filestream objects. The public releases of WinFS weren't doing anything special. The data store were regular MDB files hidden in x:\System Volume Information and filestream blobs files with GUIDs as name also hidden in that folder. The advantage was supposed to be an unified data store, where data would be stored in structured formats instead of binary blobs, unless it wasn't possible otherwise (e.g. JPEG image data, where as EXIF data would have been extracted and stored in the structured parts). Like this, every application supporting WinFS would be able to share their data between each other. -mg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] ZFS Send and recieve
Hi All ; I am not a Solaris or ZFS expert and I am in need of your help. When I run the following command zfs send -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh 10.10.103.42 zfs receive -F data/data41 if some one is accessing data/data41 folder system gives the following error message cannot umount . device is busy I assume this is notmal. I want to know how I can suspend the user accessing the folder until send and recieve command finishes it's job. Best regards Mertol http://www.sun.com/ http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +90212335 Email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] attachment: image001.gif___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Orvar Korvar wrote: My question is, because WinFS database is running on top of NTFS, could a similar thing be done for ZFS? Implement a database running on top of ZFS, that has similar functionality as WinFS? Object-oriented content management could be run on any sort of underlying file system. It is just a layer on top. (I never understood the advantages of having a database on top of NTFS, maybe it would be pointless for ZFS? Can someone knowledgeable give some input to my question?) ZFS just provides storage. It seems that the problem with object-oriented content management is that a user interface needs to be provided, which is not standardized in any way. This user interface needs to be used to put content into the system, to find content in the system, and to use content from the system. There also needs to be a way to back everything up. If the content management knows about the internal structure of the objects, then it might provide a way to access a document so that all of the objects (e.g. figures) used by that document are visible and may be updated. There are likely some mainframe environments which do this sort of thing, but mainframes are essentially closed systems so the mainframe vendor has more control. Bob == Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] Migrating from mirror to raidz
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:47 AM, Patrick Schlaepfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to migrate a zpool mirror to a zpool raidz? Right now I do have two disk mirrored. So, can I add a thrid and migrate this pool to a raidz pool, or do I have to backup all the data in the mirror, destroy the old pool, creating the raidz pool, and restoring the data? Patrick, (This is probably more appropriate on the zfs-discuss list which I have copied.) I know of no way to simply add the third disk and migrate from a mirror to a raidz, but I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. I would plan on implementing your second alternative which is to backup, destroy and recreate the pool, and then restore. Regards, -Eric ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
Orvar Korvar wrote: Ok, thanx for your answers! So, I guess there is no point in providing a database on top of ZFS, just as MS tried to do? A WinFS like thing on ZFS wouldnt be beneficial at all? Better off with plain ZFS? I don't think this is a simple question. The way ZFS is designed, you could plug a new module into the DMU. Most people interface with the ZPL (POSIX Layer) module, with some folks using ZVols. There is nothing to say that you can't come up with another module that leverages the DMU. -- richard ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] FiberChannel, and EMC tutorial?
Hi all, Can anyone explain to me, or point me to any docs that explain how the following numbers map together? I have multiple LUNS exported to my HBA's from multiple EMC arrays. zpool status, and /dev/dsk show device names like: c0t600604838794003753594D333837d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333838d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333839d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333841d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333842d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333843d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333844d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 but cfgadm shows disk names like: c4::5006048dc7dfb170 c5::5006048dc7dfb17e c7::5006048dc7dfb17e How do these numbers break down? I noticed the zpool or /dev/dsk nubmers all have a 'D' in them, what is represented by the number after the 'D'? What is the number before the 'D' made up from? I'm guessing at least part of the number befre the 'D' comes from the WWN of the array? Does part come from the Disk in the array? or does the array make up part of it so that that part is unique to the LUN? Or is all the LUN info in the number after the 'D'? I've also noticed that if you change the leading 5 in the cfgadm output, to a 6, then the first 7 digits of cfgadm output match up with the first 7 digits of Y in the cXtYdZ number. I've tried converting the remainder 'dc7dfb170' from Hex to Dec, and I don't get anythign that even resembles the '38794003753594' part of the target. How does this work? These LUNs are all 11GB slices from the EMC Arrays which are filled with 146GB drives. Since this is a lab environment I beleive the EMC arrays are configured with no redundancy. What I'd like to know, is how can I tell which LUNs might live on the same physical drives? -Kyle ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
Actually, having a database on top of an FS is really useful. It's a Content Addressable Storage system.One of the problem home users have is that they are putting more and more of their lives in digital format. Users need a way to organize and search all that info in some sort of meaningful way. Imagine having thousands of photos spread all over your filesystems with nothing but filenames associated with them. That's not too easily searchable or organized. Imagine all the objects stored on your filesystem have tags associated with them or other metadata that is required at save time. Then you can start doing things like virtual folders. Imagine a folder on your windows desktop that says Steely Dan and when you click it runs a query shows you all the music files on your computer by Steely Dan and pretends to be an explorer windows. or a virtual folder that says Springbreak 2008 pics and when you click it it goes through all your gagillion photos and creates an explorer window of just the spring break pics. Today, you'd have to tag the Metadata yourself as you put content on your computer, but Microsoft has other initiatives to do facial recognition in photos and some other things to go along with the Content addressable storage system. There's a lot of uses for Content Addressable Storage systems including revision control and some other things that home users can benefit from. At the Enterprise level, such a system would be something like the 5800(Honeycomb) from Sun. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] 7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and 220 MB/s writes on a $1320 box
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Marc Bevand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: integrated AHCI controller (SB600 chipset), 2 disks on a 2-port $20 PCI-E 1x SiI3132 controller, and the 7th disk on a $65 4-port PCI-X SiI3124 controller Do you have access to a Sil3726 port multiplier? I'd like to see how the Sil3132 performs with multiple drive attached via one, since if/when I build a ZFS based NAS, I would like to use one. It's also easier to use an external disk box like the CFI 8-drive eSATA tower than find a reasonable server case that can hold that many drives. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] 7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and 220 MB/s writes on a $1320 box
On 3/17/08, Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Marc Bevand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: integrated AHCI controller (SB600 chipset), 2 disks on a 2-port $20 PCI-E 1x SiI3132 controller, and the 7th disk on a $65 4-port PCI-X SiI3124 controller Do you have access to a Sil3726 port multiplier? I'd like to see how the Sil3132 performs with multiple drive attached via one, since if/when I build a ZFS based NAS, I would like to use one. It's also easier to use an external disk box like the CFI 8-drive eSATA tower than find a reasonable server case that can hold that many drives. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss Woah, why would you spend 1600$ on that tower? For a LOT less money, you can have more drives, and all hot swappable. http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/3U/933/SC933T-R760.cfm I paired one of those with a pair of the supermicro 8-port sata cards. Works like a charm. --Tim ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
That sounds neat. Just like spotlight(?) search function for Mac OS X, but built into the DB on top the file system? Is fast searches the only advantage? Then, isnt there any spotlight search function for solaris? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Nice chassis for ZFS server
Hi all, Did anyone ever confirm whether this ssr212 box, without hardware raid option, works reliably under OpenSolaris without fooling around with external drivers, etc.? I need a box like this, but can't find a vendor that will give me a try buy. (Yes, I'm spoiled by Sun). thx jake This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
Have you ever used a Mac? HFS has had these features for years. On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Bryan Wagoner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, having a database on top of an FS is really useful. It's a Content Addressable Storage system.One of the problem home users have is that they are putting more and more of their lives in digital format. Users need a way to organize and search all that info in some sort of meaningful way. Imagine having thousands of photos spread all over your filesystems with nothing but filenames associated with them. That's not too easily searchable or organized. Imagine all the objects stored on your filesystem have tags associated with them or other metadata that is required at save time. Then you can start doing things like virtual folders. Imagine a folder on your windows desktop that says Steely Dan and when you click it runs a query shows you all the music files on your computer by Steely Dan and pretends to be an explorer windows. or a virtual folder that says Springbreak 2008 pics and when you click it it goes through all your gagillion photos and creates an explorer window of just the spring break pics. Today, you'd have to tag the Metadata yourself as you put content on your computer, but Microsoft has other initiatives to do facial recognition in photos and some other things to go along with the Content addressable storage system. There's a lot of uses for Content Addressable Storage systems including revision control and some other things that home users can benefit from. At the Enterprise level, such a system would be something like the 5800(Honeycomb) from Sun. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- Rasputnik :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/ ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS?
So yeah, you just supported what I said about a database on top of a filesystem being useful because HFS uses a database type structure for it's catalog. It's an object based storage but the schema in HFS isn't as extensible as to what I'm referring to in future Content Addressable Storage systems. There's more than WinFs obviously out there including the future versions of SAM-FS/QFS, but the thread was about WinFS specifically. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] 7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and 220 MB/s writes on a $1320 box
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/17/08, Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: easier to use an external disk box like the CFI 8-drive eSATA tower than find a reasonable server case that can hold that many drives. Woah, why would you spend 1600$ on that tower? For a LOT less money, you can have more drives, and all hot swappable. I'm not sure where you got that price. Newegg has the CFI-B8283 for about $350. The case you mentioned is about $750. I also don't have a rack at home, so a pedestal or tower case is required. -B ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] 7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and 220 MB/s writes on a $1320 box
Brandon High bhigh at freaks.com writes: Do you have access to a Sil3726 port multiplier? Nope. But AFAIK OpenSolaris doesn't support port multipliers yet. Maybe FreeBSD does. Keep in mind that three modern drives (334GB/platter) are all it takes to saturate a SATA 3.0Gbps link. It's also easier to use an external disk box like the CFI 8-drive eSATA tower than find a reasonable server case that can hold that many drives. If you are willing to go cheap you can get something that holds 8 drives for $70: buy a standard tower case with five internal 3.5 bays ($50), and one of these enclosures that fit in two 5.25 bays but give you three 3.5 bays ($20). -marc ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] FiberChannel, and EMC tutorial?
Kyle McDonald schrieb: Hi all, Can anyone explain to me, or point me to any docs that explain how the following numbers map together? I have multiple LUNS exported to my HBA's from multiple EMC arrays. zpool status, and /dev/dsk show device names like: c0t600604838794003753594D333837d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333838d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333839d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333841d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333842d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333843d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t600604838794003753594D333844d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 but cfgadm shows disk names like: c4::5006048dc7dfb170 c5::5006048dc7dfb17e c7::5006048dc7dfb17e How do these numbers break down? I noticed the zpool or /dev/dsk nubmers all have a 'D' in them, what is represented by the number after the 'D'? What is the number before the 'D' made up from? I'm guessing at least part of the number befre the 'D' comes from the WWN of the array? Does part come from the Disk in the array? or does the array make up part of it so that that part is unique to the LUN? Or is all the LUN info in the number after the 'D'? I've also noticed that if you change the leading 5 in the cfgadm output, to a 6, then the first 7 digits of cfgadm output match up with the first 7 digits of Y in the cXtYdZ number. I've tried converting the remainder 'dc7dfb170' from Hex to Dec, and I don't get anythign that even resembles the '38794003753594' part of the target. How does this work? These LUNs are all 11GB slices from the EMC Arrays which are filled with 146GB drives. Since this is a lab environment I beleive the EMC arrays are configured with no redundancy. What I'd like to know, is how can I tell which LUNs might live on the same physical drives? I don't have a Symmetrix here to check (have to wait 'til tomorrow), but your Symmetrix should have a serial number of 387940037 and you have mapped the symmetrix IDs 387-38D in the above example: 600604838794003753594D333837 . 006048 should be the vendor identifier for EMC . 387940037 Serial-No. of your Symmetrix . 53594D ASCII code of SYM . 333837 ASCII code of 387 Some of the information above was built from the WWN information, some from the SCSI inquiry (esp. the serial number). You can get a full inquiry of your disk with: # format -e c0t600604838794003753594D333837d0s2 format scsi scsi inquiry In the hexdump of the full inquiry information you can find . 8 bytes vendor ID (EMC ), . followed by 16 bytes product ID (SYMMETRIX ) . folled by (up to) 20 bytes serial number. In the serial number you will find again the symdev (387) of this device and the last few digits of the serial number. With the EMC SE tools you can query more information of your symdevs: symdev -sid 037 show 387 will show under Backend Configuration the real disks where this device is located. Daniel ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS ACLs/Samba integration
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 18:11 -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote: I think it is a misnomer to call the current implementation of ZFS a pure ACL system, as clearly the ACLs are heavily contaminated by legacy mode bits. Feel free to open an RFE. It may be a tough sell with PSARC, but maybe if we have enough customer requests maybe they can be won over. It is always wrong to have a mental model of PSARC as a monolithic entity. I suspect at least some of the membership would be interested in this sort of extension and it shouldn't be that hard to sell if it's not the default behavior and it's clearly documented that turning it on (probably on a fs-by-fs basis like every other zfs tunable) takes you out of POSIX land. - Bill ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS ACLs/Samba integration
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Bill Sommerfeld wrote: I suspect at least some of the membership would be interested in this sort of extension and it shouldn't be that hard to sell if it's not the default behavior and it's clearly documented that turning it on (probably on a fs-by-fs basis like every other zfs tunable) takes you out of POSIX land. I was actually rereading the Solaris ZFS Administration Guide; based on it the behavior I want should already be available: The ZFS file system includes two property modes related to ACLs: aclinherit - This property determines the behavior of ACL inheritance. Values include the following: passthrough - For new objects, the inheritable ACL entries are inherited with no changes made to them. This mode, in effect, disables secure mode. aclmode - This property modifies ACL behavior whenever a file or directory's mode is modified by the chmod command or when a file is initially created. Values include the following: passthrough - For new objects, the inheritable ACL entries are inherited with no changes made to them. This documentation would seem to indicate that if both aclinherit and aclmode are set to passthrough, then the inheritable ACL entries are inherited with no changes made to them. However, as I originally posted, the inheritable ACL entries I configured are being munged. Based on the documentation, this behavior is broken. -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED] California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Solaris Drivers (was: 7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and 220 MB/s writes on a $1320 box)
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Marc Bevand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PCI-X card...). The rest is also dirty cheap: $65 Asus M2A-VM motherboard, $60 dual-core Athlon 64 X2 4000+, with 1GB of DDR2 800, and a 400W PSU. Apologies for the threadjack (um, again) but did you know that the RS690 chipset would be supported before buying it, or did you get the output from lspci elsewhere, or did you just hope? Looking at the device list from http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/devicelist/ , there's no indication that the 690 will work with Solaris. In fact, the ahci driver (which is what you mentioned you're using) doesn't even show up on that list. The SXDE man page for ahci only lists support for the Intel ICH6/7/8/9 and VIA vt8251. ( http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2254/ahci-7d?a=view ) The lack of documentation for supported devices is a general complaint of mine with Solaris x86, perhaps better taken to the opensolaris-discuss list however. -B ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS ACLs/Samba integration
Paul B. Henson wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Bill Sommerfeld wrote: I suspect at least some of the membership would be interested in this sort of extension and it shouldn't be that hard to sell if it's not the default behavior and it's clearly documented that turning it on (probably on a fs-by-fs basis like every other zfs tunable) takes you out of POSIX land. I was actually rereading the Solaris ZFS Administration Guide; based on it the behavior I want should already be available: The ZFS file system includes two property modes related to ACLs: aclinherit - This property determines the behavior of ACL inheritance. Values include the following: passthrough - For new objects, the inheritable ACL entries are inherited with no changes made to them. This mode, in effect, disables secure mode. aclmode - This property modifies ACL behavior whenever a file or directory's mode is modified by the chmod command or when a file is initially created. Values include the following: passthrough - For new objects, the inheritable ACL entries are inherited with no changes made to them. This documentation would seem to indicate that if both aclinherit and aclmode are set to passthrough, then the inheritable ACL entries are inherited with no changes made to them. However, as I originally posted, the inheritable ACL entries I configured are being munged. Based on the documentation, this behavior is broken. The documentation in the admin guide isn't quite correct. I will go ahead and do a fastrack to get the behavior that many people want. Basically, if inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group@, everyone@ then the inherited ACE permissions will override the requested mode of the application. If no inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group, or everyone@ then the mode will be used. -Mark ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS ACLs/Samba integration
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote: I will go ahead and do a fastrack to get the behavior that many people want. Basically, if inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group@, everyone@ then the inherited ACE permissions will override the requested mode of the application. If no inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group, or everyone@ then the mode will be used. *Sweet*!!! That sounds perfect! Is that something that might be backported to production Solaris 10 in a patch? Or something that would have to wait for an update release? We are currently prototyping an NFSv4/Samba file services implementation for our campus, management is requiring official support for the OS so OpenSolaris isn't really an option; but I don't think we can deploy without this fix. Thanks much... -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED] California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS ACLs/Samba integration
Paul B. Henson wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote: I will go ahead and do a fastrack to get the behavior that many people want. Basically, if inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group@, everyone@ then the inherited ACE permissions will override the requested mode of the application. If no inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group, or everyone@ then the mode will be used. *Sweet*!!! That sounds perfect! Is that something that might be backported to production Solaris 10 in a patch? Or something that would have to wait for an update release? We are currently prototyping an NFSv4/Samba file services implementation for our campus, management is requiring official support for the OS so OpenSolaris isn't really an option; but I don't think we can deploy without this fix. Thanks much... No guarantees, but I think it should be back portable to Solaris 10. -Mark ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris Drivers (was: 7-disk raidz ac hieves 430 MB/s reads and 220 MB/s writes on a $1320 box)
Brandon High bhigh at freaks.com writes: [...] The lack of documentation for supported devices is a general complaint of mine with Solaris x86, perhaps better taken to the opensolaris-discuss list however. I replied to all your questions in opensolaris-discuss. -marc ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
