Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-29 Thread Tim Cook
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Krunal Desai mov...@gmail.com wrote:

  There are problems with Sandforce controllers, according to forum posts.
 Buggy firmware. And in practice, Sandforce is far below it's theoretical
 values. I expect Intel to have fewer problems.

 I believe it's more the firmware (and pace of firmware updates) from
 companies making Sandforce-based drives than it is the controller.
 Enthusiasts can tolerate OCZ and others releasing alphas/betas in forum
 posts.

 While the G2 Intel drives may not be the performance kings anymore (or the
 most price-effective), I'd argue they're certainly the most stable when it
 comes to firmware. Have my eye on a G3 Intel drive for my laptop, where I
 can't really afford beta firmware updates biting me on the road.

 --khd



Again this is news to me.  Do you have examples?  There were plenty of
revisions when they first dropped 6-8 months ago, but I haven't heard of
anything similar in quite some time. As for Intel, they've had their share
of issues as well.  I assume you remember the data-loss inducing BIOS
password bug?

--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-28 Thread David Magda

On Nov 27, 2010, at 16:14, Tim Cook wrote:

You don't need drivers for any SATA based SSD.  It shows up as a  
standard
hard drive and plugs into a standard SATA port.  By the time the G3  
Intel
drive is out, the next gen Sandforce should be out as well.  Unless  
Intel

does something revolutionary, they will still be behind the Sandforce
drives.


Are you referring to the SF-2000 chips?

http://www.sandforce.com/index.php?id=133
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1429/1/
http://www.google.com/search?q=sandforce+sf-2000

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-28 Thread Orvar Korvar
There are problems with Sandforce controllers, according to forum posts. Buggy 
firmware. And in practice, Sandforce is far below it's theoretical values. I 
expect Intel to have fewer problems.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-28 Thread Tim Cook
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Orvar Korvar 
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:

 There are problems with Sandforce controllers, according to forum posts.
 Buggy firmware. And in practice, Sandforce is far below it's theoretical
 values. I expect Intel to have fewer problems.


According to what forum posts?  There were issues when Crucial and a few
others released alpha firmware into production...  Anandtech has put those
drives through the ringer without issue.  Several people on this list are
running them as well.

--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-28 Thread Tim Cook
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:

 On Nov 27, 2010, at 16:14, Tim Cook wrote:

  You don't need drivers for any SATA based SSD.  It shows up as a standard
 hard drive and plugs into a standard SATA port.  By the time the G3 Intel
 drive is out, the next gen Sandforce should be out as well.  Unless Intel
 does something revolutionary, they will still be behind the Sandforce
 drives.


 Are you referring to the SF-2000 chips?

http://www.sandforce.com/index.php?id=133
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1429/1/
http://www.google.com/search?q=sandforce+sf-2000



Yup.

--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-28 Thread Krunal Desai
 There are problems with Sandforce controllers, according to forum posts. 
 Buggy firmware. And in practice, Sandforce is far below it's theoretical 
 values. I expect Intel to have fewer problems.

I believe it's more the firmware (and pace of firmware updates) from companies 
making Sandforce-based drives than it is the controller. Enthusiasts can 
tolerate OCZ and others releasing alphas/betas in forum posts.

While the G2 Intel drives may not be the performance kings anymore (or the most 
price-effective), I'd argue they're certainly the most stable when it comes to 
firmware. Have my eye on a G3 Intel drive for my laptop, where I can't really 
afford beta firmware updates biting me on the road.

--khd

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
   From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
 
  In fact, I recently got one of these Samsung drives...
  http://tinyurl.com/38s3ac3
  The spec sheet says sequential read 220MB/s, sequential write 120MB/s...
  Which is 2-4 times faster than the best SATA disk out there...  And of
  course, negligible seek time and latency ...
 
  But in practice, I find that drive is no faster than my cheap 500G sata
  disk.  Or maybe just barely faster.  Not much.
 
 From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
 
 What kind of testing did you do on the Samsung SSD?

Nothing official yet.  Although I plan to run a benchmark on it sometime, I
haven't got the cycles available for now.  I am using these as the OS drive
in some laptops, and I expected it to make the laptop faster.  Well, maybe
it did, but it's pretty negligible.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Orvar Korvar
A noob question:

These drives that people talk about, can you use them as a system disc too? 
Install Solaris 11 Express on them? Or can you only use them as a L2ARC or Zil?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Orvar Korvar 
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:

 A noob question:

 These drives that people talk about, can you use them as a system disc too?
 Install Solaris 11 Express on them? Or can you only use them as a L2ARC or
 Zil?
 --


They're a standard SATA hard drive.  You can use them for whatever you'd
like.  For the price though, they aren't really worth the money to buy just
to put your OS on.   Your system drive on a Solaris system generally doesn't
see enough I/O activity to require the kind of IOPS you can get out of most
modern SSD's.  If you were using the system as a workstation, it'd
definitely help, as applications tend to feel more responsive with an SSD.
That's all I run in my laptops now.

--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:19:50PM -0600, Tim Cook wrote:

 They're a standard SATA hard drive.  You can use them for whatever you'd
 like.  For the price though, they aren't really worth the money to buy just
 to put your OS on.   Your system drive on a Solaris system generally doesn't
 see enough I/O activity to require the kind of IOPS you can get out of most

I run hundreds of vserver guests from an SSD, only the /home is mounted
on a hard drive/RAID.

 modern SSD's.  If you were using the system as a workstation, it'd
 definitely help, as applications tend to feel more responsive with an SSD.
 That's all I run in my laptops now.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Orvar Korvar
Your system drive on a Solaris system generally doesn't see enough I/O 
activity to require the kind of IOPS you can get out of most modern SSD's. 

My system drive sees a lot of activity, to the degree everything is going slow. 
I have a SunRay that my girlfriend use, and I have 5-10 torrents going on, and 
surf the web - often my system crawls. Very often my girlfriend gets irritated 
because everything lags and she frequently asks me if she can do some task, or 
if she should wait until I have finished copying my files. Unbearable.

I have a quad core Intel 9450 at 2.66GHz, and 8GB RAM.

I am planning to use a SSD and really hope it will be faster.




$ iostat -xcnXCTdz 1

cpu
us sy wt id
 25  7  0 68
extended device statistics  
r/sw/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t  %w  %b device
0,00,00,00,0  0,0  0,00,00,0   0   0 c8
0,00,00,00,0  0,0  0,00,00,0   0   0 c8t0d0
   37,0  442,1 4489,6 51326,1  7,5  2,0   15,74,1  98 100 c7d0
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Orvar Korvar 
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Your system drive on a Solaris system generally doesn't see enough I/O
 activity to require the kind of IOPS you can get out of most modern SSD's. 

 My system drive sees a lot of activity, to the degree everything is going
 slow. I have a SunRay that my girlfriend use, and I have 5-10 torrents going
 on, and surf the web - often my system crawls. Very often my girlfriend gets
 irritated because everything lags and she frequently asks me if she can do
 some task, or if she should wait until I have finished copying my files.
 Unbearable.

 I have a quad core Intel 9450 at 2.66GHz, and 8GB RAM.

 I am planning to use a SSD and really hope it will be faster.




 $ iostat -xcnXCTdz 1

 cpu
 us sy wt id
  25  7  0 68
extended device statistics
r/sw/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t  %w  %b device
0,00,00,00,0  0,0  0,00,00,0   0   0 c8
0,00,00,00,0  0,0  0,00,00,0   0   0 c8t0d0
   37,0  442,1 4489,6 51326,1  7,5  2,0   15,74,1  98 100 c7d0



Desktop usage is a different beast as I alluded to.  A dedicated server
typically doesn't have any issues.  I'd strongly suggest getting one of the
sandforce controller based SSD's.  They're the best on the market right now
by far.

--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Chris Mosetick
A word of caution on the Silicon Image 3124.  I have tested out a two
extremely cheap card using the si3124 driver on b134 and OIb147.  One card
was PCI, the other PCI-X.  I found that both are unusable until the driver
is updated.  Large'ish file transfers, say over 1GB would lock up the
machine and cause a kernel panic.  Investigation revealed it was si3124.
The driver is in serious need of an update, at least in the builds mentioned
above.  It's possible that a firmware update on the card would help, but I
never had time to explore that option.  If a device using the si3124 driver
works great for you in a L2ARC role after extensive testing, then by all
means use it, I just wanted to pass along my experience.

-Chris

The RevoDrive should not require a custom device driver as it is based on
 the
 Silicon Image 3124 PCI-X RAID controller connected to a Pericom PCI-X to
 PCIe bridge chip (PI7C9X130).  The required driver would be the si3124(7D),
 I noticed the man page states NCQ is not supported.  I found the following
 link
 detailing the status:

 http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=466436

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Orvar Korvar
I am waiting for the next gen Intel SSD drives, G3. They are arriving very 
soon. And from what I can infer by reading here, I can use it without issues. 
Solaris will recognize the Intel SDD drive without any drivers needed, or 
whatever? 

Intel new SSD should work with Solaris 11 Express, yes?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Moazam Raja
Agreed, SSD with SandForce controllers are the only way to go. The
controller makes a world of difference.

-Moazam


On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:


 On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Orvar Korvar
 knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Your system drive on a Solaris system generally doesn't see enough I/O
 activity to require the kind of IOPS you can get out of most modern SSD's. 

 My system drive sees a lot of activity, to the degree everything is going
 slow. I have a SunRay that my girlfriend use, and I have 5-10 torrents going
 on, and surf the web - often my system crawls. Very often my girlfriend gets
 irritated because everything lags and she frequently asks me if she can do
 some task, or if she should wait until I have finished copying my files.
 Unbearable.

 I have a quad core Intel 9450 at 2.66GHz, and 8GB RAM.

 I am planning to use a SSD and really hope it will be faster.




 $ iostat -xcnXCTdz 1

 cpu
 us sy wt id
  25  7  0 68
                    extended device statistics
    r/s    w/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t  %w  %b device
    0,0    0,0    0,0    0,0  0,0  0,0    0,0    0,0   0   0 c8
    0,0    0,0    0,0    0,0  0,0  0,0    0,0    0,0   0   0 c8t0d0
   37,0  442,1 4489,6 51326,1  7,5  2,0   15,7    4,1  98 100 c7d0

 Desktop usage is a different beast as I alluded to.  A dedicated server
 typically doesn't have any issues.  I'd strongly suggest getting one of the
 sandforce controller based SSD's.  They're the best on the market right now
 by far.

 --Tim
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-27 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Orvar Korvar 
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I am waiting for the next gen Intel SSD drives, G3. They are arriving very
 soon. And from what I can infer by reading here, I can use it without
 issues. Solaris will recognize the Intel SDD drive without any drivers
 needed, or whatever?

 Intel new SSD should work with Solaris 11 Express, yes?


You don't need drivers for any SATA based SSD.  It shows up as a standard
hard drive and plugs into a standard SATA port.  By the time the G3 Intel
drive is out, the next gen Sandforce should be out as well.  Unless Intel
does something revolutionary, they will still be behind the Sandforce
drives.

--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-26 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
 From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
 boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas
 
 I'm curious if there is a support for OCZ RevoDrive SSD or any other SSD
 hooked directly on PCIe in Solaris. This RevoDrive looks particularly
 interesting for its low price and why to buy something SATA based when
 someone might have twice the speed on PCIe for the same money

If you want arc cache, something like the above might be good because it's
larger...
But if you want log device, I promise you the DDRDrive will kick the butt of
any flash device.  (In terms of performance.)

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-26 Thread Karel Gardas
Thank you Christopher and Edward for all the detailed information provided. 
Indeed DDRDrive looks like a right tool for fast ZIL, but for my development 
workstation I'm rather searching for l2arc cache where as you note ReviDrive 
might do the nice job.
Thanks,
Karel
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-26 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
 From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
 boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas
 
 Thank you Christopher and Edward for all the detailed information
provided.
 Indeed DDRDrive looks like a right tool for fast ZIL, but for my
development
 workstation I'm rather searching for l2arc cache where as you note
ReviDrive
 might do the nice job.

Be sure to test the performance of the device when/if you get it.  A lot of
SSD's out there don't perform any better than spindle drives.

In fact, I recently got one of these Samsung drives...
http://tinyurl.com/38s3ac3
The spec sheet says sequential read 220MB/s, sequential write 120MB/s...
Which is 2-4 times faster than the best SATA disk out there...  And of
course, negligible seek time and latency ...  

But in practice, I find that drive is no faster than my cheap 500G sata
disk.  Or maybe just barely faster.  Not much.

You can't go wrong by adding more RAM.  Until you hit the price barrier.
Before you start building l2arc.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-26 Thread moazam

What kind of testing did you do on the Samsung SSD?

I've used FusionIO cards to get upwards of 500MB/s writes and OCZ Deneva  
SSD (SATA) drives to get 200-250MB/s writes. In many cases the trick is to  
make sure you have a sufficient amount of threads doing writes in order to  
get optimal performance.


Or it could just be that the Samsung drive you tested has something  
seriously wrong with it.


-Moazam

On Nov 26, 2010 8:40pm, Edward Ned Harvey sh...@nedharvey.com wrote:

 From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-



 boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas







 Thank you Christopher and Edward for all the detailed information



provided.



 Indeed DDRDrive looks like a right tool for fast ZIL, but for my



development



 workstation I'm rather searching for l2arc cache where as you note



ReviDrive



 might do the nice job.





Be sure to test the performance of the device when/if you get it. A lot of



SSD's out there don't perform any better than spindle drives.





In fact, I recently got one of these Samsung drives...



http://tinyurl.com/38s3ac3



The spec sheet says sequential read 220MB/s, sequential write 120MB/s...



Which is 2-4 times faster than the best SATA disk out there... And of



course, negligible seek time and latency ...





But in practice, I find that drive is no faster than my cheap 500G sata



disk. Or maybe just barely faster. Not much.





You can't go wrong by adding more RAM. Until you hit the price barrier.



Before you start building l2arc.





___



zfs-discuss mailing list



zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org



http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-25 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello,
I'm curious if there is a support for OCZ RevoDrive SSD or any other SSD hooked 
directly on PCIe in Solaris. This RevoDrive looks particularly interesting for 
its low price and why to buy something SATA based when someone might have twice 
the speed on PCIe for the same money
Thanks,
Karel
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ RevoDrive ZFS support

2010-11-25 Thread Christopher George
 I'm curious if there is a support for OCZ RevoDrive SSD or any other
 SSD hooked directly on PCIe in Solaris.

The RevoDrive should not require a custom device driver as it is based on the 
Silicon Image 3124 PCI-X RAID controller connected to a Pericom PCI-X to 
PCIe bridge chip (PI7C9X130).  The required driver would be the si3124(7D), 
I noticed the man page states NCQ is not supported.  I found the following link 
detailing the status:

http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=466436

It might make an interesting L2ARC device, as it is definitely low cost.  It's 
based on multiple SandForce 1200 controllers.  Important to note because the 
on-board volatile caches are not power protected, so not a good fit for the ZIL 
Accelerator.  But perfectly acceptable for the L2ARC as drive contents are not 
required to survive a power failure (at this time).

Our PCIe based SSD, the DDRdrive X1, does require a dedicated device 
driver and we exclusively target ZIL acceleration.  We support OpenSolaris 
(2009-06 through b134), OpenIndiana, and NexentaStor 3.0.

I am excited to announce we just completed validation and are now also 
supporting Solaris 11 Express!

Best regards,

Christopher George
Founder/CTO
www.ddrdrive.com
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss