loads and loads of list mail just appeared in my inbox - thought It had
been quiet so I'm replying to this, sorry if you thought I was ignoring
you - I wasn't
tristan>
Alex,
I don't mean to single you out or anything, b/c I can tell you're doing
things for the right reasons, but wouldn't it
Phonopsia:
I'm
>not trying
>to blame you for anything, I just wish I would've known something
>about this
>beforehand if this guy had a bad history.
To be fair - Alex mentioned stuff abt this guy *months* ago + *again*
recently when the Cosmic Twins thing was announced.
Less Overlording more 313
- Original Message -
From: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313 Detroit" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
> They're fraternal Cosmic Twins not identical,
- Original Message -
From: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313 Detroit" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
> Maybe that gig gives them the chance to be expose
PROTECTED]>, <313@hyperreal.org>
>Subject: Re: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
>Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 8:05 PM
>
> I don't really know what happened in London to be honest. FK came on at 1
> and played a good techno set, liberal use of FX as usual, but by 1.30 it
situations.
--
>From: "Phonopsia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <313@hyperreal.org>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
>Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 4:31 AM
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EM
Alex wrote:
> > wouldn't be anything to do with the fact they were playing at some
> > corporate s*** do, conceived by someone who's 'doing it for the kids
(the
> > gatecrasher kids)' and wouldn't think twice about having them play back
to
> > back with Oakenfold as long as it made a few quid woul
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
> wouldn't be anything to do with the fact they were playing at some
> corporate s*** do, conceived
:25:55 +0100
> To: "ian cheshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <313@hyperreal.org>
> Subject: Re: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
>
> Weatherall is an excellent example of someone who has strong principles, (ie
> a "socialist&q
; - Original Message -
> From: "ian cheshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 12:21 PM
> Subject: RE: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
>
>
>> some DJ's aren&#
night was fantastic. tanaka built v.nicely, everything seemed to start
going crazy during atkins' set, then hood played the tightest set of tunes
all perfectly building and exploring. brilliant atmosphere, chatty crowd,
everyone seemed to leave excited and impressed - another memorable lost :)
.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
> some DJ's aren't like this and I know Andrew Weatherall
> will take a cut if he is into the night etc, so maybe try him Martin
&
13@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
>
>
>
> No offence taken at all Martin.
>
>> I recently got
> turned down by a famous name because my club night only holds 350 people,
> there was no profit in the gig for me but it does make
> some DJ's aren't like this and I know Andrew Weatherall
> will take a cut if he is into the night etc, so maybe try him Martin
i've seen justin robertson and trevor rockliffe do this too (when the door
was low)
robin...
22/4/03 11:03 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@uk.pwc.com
>
> No offence taken at all Martin.
:)
> probably have a more 'educated' crowd up
> for something a bit different, and wouldn't have to play to 1000
> gatecrasher kids ala Sankeys who just want the latest banging tech-house
> numbers - therefore m
s Re: (313) Lost/Hood
No offence taken at all Martin.
>I recently got
turned down by a famous name because my club night only holds 350 people,
there was no profit in the gig for me but it does make it hard for
us...although I get the feeling this was his agents doing...
Right, my point exac
No offence taken at all Martin.
>I recently got
turned down by a famous name because my club night only holds 350 people,
there was no profit in the gig for me but it does make it hard for
us...although I get the feeling this was his agents doing...
Right, my point exactly. A crying shame. You'r
22/4/03 10:34 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@uk.pwc.com
>
>> And you work for PricewaterhouseCoopers :) made me smile
>
> heh, see what you mean, I'm the postman though, I take the money, abuse the
> internet and run...
Sure, Just made me smile...no harm intended...
>
>> Why take the booking in the
>And you work for PricewaterhouseCoopers :) made me smile
heh, see what you mean, I'm the postman though, I take the money, abuse the
internet and run...
>Why take the booking in the first place would be my question.
Well yeah, but ££. Unfortunately, these sort of clubs/organisation
> both of them. To be honest, from both their expressions, they looked
> thoroughly bored by it all.
...turn up...play same records they did nite before in tokyo/paris/sydney
(delete as appropriate)...pocket the 5000 dollars...go back to luxury
hotel...
life's a bitch eh?
:)
robin...
Martin:
>Hey Alex
>
>>>playing at some
>> corporate s*** do
>
>And you work for PricewaterhouseCoopers :) made me smile
We've all gotta live. We are the mere cogs in the machine and I see no
revolution pending near-term.
k
Hey Alex
>>playing at some
> corporate s*** do
And you work for PricewaterhouseCoopers :) made me smile
>>>conceived by someone who's 'doing it for the kids (the
> gatecrasher kids)'
Why take the booking in the first place would be my question. I know what
you mean about Lost tho...
wouldn't be anything to do with the fact they were playing at some
corporate s*** do, conceived by someone who's 'doing it for the kids (the
gatecrasher kids)' and wouldn't think twice about having them play back to
back with Oakenfold as long as it made a few quid would it?
Or maybe it wouldn't.
- Original Message -
From: "robin pinning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 10:52 AM
Subject: (313) Cosmic Twins was Re: (313) Lost/Hood
>
> > I heard there was some controversy at the May/Kervorkian gig on Thu ...
> &g
> I heard there was some controversy at the May/Kervorkian gig on Thu ...
> anyone care to elaborate?
did anyone see these guys in manchester at sankey's too? any good?
robin...
Atkins stole the show though...highlight was that
Surgeon track with the big breakdown.
I thought Hood played far too many of his own records
(which I'm a fan of but it needed a bit of
variation)...still it was very enjoyable in parts...
Weatherall was deadly upstairs too
Great night all
Deep dark set - tightest I've heard almost anyone play for far too long.
Whenever it happens, always reminds me that there is a place for the
'purist' form, but really only in the hands of those who know what they're
doing.
I heard there was some controversy at the May/Kervorkian gig on Thu ...
an
27 matches
Mail list logo
