Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-22 Thread yussel
out. > > > > -- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] > >Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:25 PM > > > > > -sigh- >

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-22 Thread Cyclone Wehner
uess they don't want to pimp themselves out. -- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] >Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:25 PM > > -sigh- > > i k

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-22 Thread yussel
-sigh- i knew somebody would get upset about this. i wasn't implying that the music that peacefrog puts out isn't good. nore am i stating that some of these veteran producers (hood, dixon, larkin) don't deserve a solid label to release their music- particualarly at a time when other labels are str

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-21 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >DOn't see anythign new and exciting coming from Peacefrog. Just the old >stand-bys. Notgood for the long run. youve got to be kidding. peacefrog does the nearly impossible: they stay relevant and release mos

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-21 Thread Phonopsia
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 5:36 AM Subject: Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] > perhaps their approach is to just put out music that they

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-21 Thread yussel
uite a powerhouse lately. > > MEK > > > > Greg Earle > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313@hyperreal.org > DNS.ORG> cc: > Subje

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-21 Thread yussel
it wasn't peacfrog giving the lowball. it was a certain MAJOR label. On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Greg Earle wrote: > "Maxim Sullivan" wrote: > >> I think a few big artists have LP's ready and are struggling to find the > >> advances they're looking for. > > > > So anyone heard anymore on the Kenny Larki

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-20 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
cc: Subject: Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] 12/20/

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-20 Thread Greg Earle
"Maxim Sullivan" wrote: >> I think a few big artists have LP's ready and are struggling to find the >> advances they're looking for. > > So anyone heard anymore on the Kenny Larkin LP ? > Is this the reason his has been delayed? Whoo boy. I was kibbitzing on a convo between Kenny and Our Man [EM

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-20 Thread Cyclone Louise Wehner
I would imagine he just wants everything to feel right. -- >From: "Maxim Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <313@hyperreal.org> >Subject: Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 2:00 AM > >> I thin

RE: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-19 Thread Redmond, Ja'Maul
December 18, 2003 10:51 PM To: 313 Detroit Subject: Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] Not dying, but changing. I know I've said it before but the impact of file sharing has been profound - added to the economic uncertainty. You can talk to any label boss, from Simon

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-19 Thread alex . bond
>So anyone heard anymore on the Kenny Larkin LP ? there's two! _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-19 Thread Maxim Sullivan
> I think a few big artists have LP's ready and are struggling to find the > advances they're looking for. So anyone heard anymore on the Kenny Larkin LP ? Is this the reason his has been delayed? Max

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-19 Thread Cyclone Louise Wehner
small market. He was more like the UK market is in complete disarray. I am curious to hear it, he says it's not straight 4/4, more ol' skool funk album. -- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: 313@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-19 Thread alex . bond
>DJ Sneak says he had trouble finding a UK label deal for his album 'cause >labels were scared - and he's had that huge Fix That Sink hit so he would be >a viable prospect, you'd imagine. I think a few big artists have LP's ready and are struggling to find the advances they're looking for. Someti

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-19 Thread Cyclone Louise Wehner
Not dying, but changing. I know I've said it before but the impact of file sharing has been profound - added to the economic uncertainty. You can talk to any label boss, from Simon Dunmore (Defected/Stealth) to Luke Solomon (Classic) to Meat Katie (and breaks are big and all that) and you'll get th

Re: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-16 Thread Phonopsia
- Original Message - From: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:41 PM Subject: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] > -- Original Message ---

RE: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-16 Thread Odeluga, Ken
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:42 PM >To: 313@hyperreal.org >Subject: (313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk] > > >-- Original Message -- >From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

(313) dying business? [was: RE: Nu Era on Twisted Funk]

2003-12-16 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Pleased to see that it's clearly going to be popular (judging from the >responses I got and the number of places which are going to stock it - >around the world). Is this *really* a dying busin