Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-15 Thread DJ DMT
n.p. petestrumentals - Original Message - From: Michael Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 11:59 PM Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. this would most likely, in effect, damp the resonances. in other words, making sure

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. your answers

2001-04-14 Thread Joel Reitzloff
] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 5:58 AM Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. I think alot of the quality of the audio goes out the window after digital quantizantion. Something I don't understand here - so much music is made with samplers and other

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. your answers

2001-04-14 Thread eric hamilton
don't argue? --- Joel Reitzloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually, the machines producing your favorite sounds are producing AT LEAST, and DONT ARGUE 24bit sound, sometimes even at 48000 or higher khz. First, CD Quality is 16 bit, 44.1khz. 48khz is NOT enough of a difference that you would

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-14 Thread Michael Kim
that might be cool nothing is worse than having a needle jump. Mike From: DJ DMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313 detroit 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:12:46 +0200 I can make a nice drawing of this but it's actually true

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. your answers

2001-04-14 Thread Michael Kim
funny. worry more about speaker distortions. what this has to do with 313 i don't know, but it had to be said. :) Mike From: Joel Reitzloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: --autopilot-- [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. your answers Date: Sat

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-13 Thread DJ DMT
of bricks But maybe you can tell me something about th'm different frequenties the quartz resonates to ? dmt - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 12:33 PM Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. needle

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread --autopilot--
I think alot of the quality of the audio goes out the window after digital quantizantion. Something I don't understand here - so much music is made with samplers and other digital devices, so presumably the sound coming out is quantised to 16-bit/44.1KHz by definition anyway - how can writing

RE: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread Steven Taylor
Debates r.e. the quality of mp3 files are mainly irrelevant at present since the primary point of mp3 files is swapping, i.e. you take what you can get in terms of bitrate. Sure, higher bitrates sound better, but most extant files are lower bitrate. Since it's a lossy compression

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread Jochem_Peteri
needle resonance can add dynamics if mastered properly. 154

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread Otto Koppius
Ash wrote: Something I don't understand here - so much music is made with samplers and other digital devices, so presumably the sound coming out is quantised to 16-bit/44.1KHz by definition anyway - how can writing that quantised sound onto vinyl suddenly give it a better dynamic range /

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread chrise
I think alot of the quality of the audio goes out the window after digital quantizantion. Something I don't understand here - so much music is made with samplers and other digital devices, so presumably the sound coming out is quantised to 16-bit/44.1KHz by definition anyway - how can

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread --autopilot--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] needle resonance can add dynamics if mastered properly. Which raises the question, can needle resonance be simulated in a purely digital domain ? Or does it occur at frequencies above the audible / 22.05 KHz range ? After all, pickups are mechanical devices, so they should

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread --autopilot--
.. which reminds me, *sort of* on topic, and *sort of* a plug, kinda... for those interested in new [digital] DJing technology and in the London UK area. As I've mentioned before, I'm currently working [privately] on an experimental DJ software project called hummingbird. Runs on a Wintel PC,

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-11 Thread Jeffrey Paul
At 08:21 AM 4/11/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: exactly - even the tracks made with all analgue synths and drum machines are generally mastered to DAT, which is if i remember right 16 bit 44khz, same as CD. dat can go up to 48khz sampling (same as most newer soundcards these days) (still 16

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-10 Thread Jochem_Peteri
there´s more to vinyl than just the soundquality, keep listening to our stuff and find out..i don´t release much stuff on cd, otherwise u could hear the difference...there can b so much more sub and spatial highs because of needle resonance and stuffbig up to mike from SSR for showin us

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-10 Thread Craig Stodolenak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: there´s more to vinyl than just the soundquality, keep listening to our stuff and find out..i don´t release much stuff on cd, otherwise u could hear the difference...there can b so much more sub and spatial highs because of needle resonance and stuff... True, vinyl -- or

RE: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-10 Thread Gwendal Cobert
Is anyone as excited about this stuff as I am? Just wondering.. / resume your activities. Same goes for me - bought a DVD player that reads MP3 CDs + have been owning a Lyra (1 hour of music) for more than one year now... Doesn't prevent me from still buying CDs to get a really good

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-10 Thread Scotto
True, vinyl -- or at least new vinyl -- has higher audio dynamics than CD, but then these enhancements can only be realized with a proper (and more importantly, properly _tuned_) PA. Any other differences between vinyl and CD are due to mastering; processes which in turn can be encoded to a

Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.

2001-04-10 Thread DJ DMT
in winamp a real nice welcome tool on mastering and dynamic control can also make a track nice and gritty Dj DMT - Original Message - From: Scotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are. True