I really, really understand ethical reasons for removing Google as
default, but on the other hand
- you will have best successes by using Google
- you do have google.land/linux/ the Google search engine just for Linux
- you might want to add the CustomizeGoogle as default extension to
Firefox in
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> How can this be done for the panel applet?
>>>
>>>
>> apt-get install gksu-polkit
>>
>
> The idea to set SUID results from the fact, that there is no PolicyKit
> for Hardy. SUID is made for such cases. The probable security risk for a
> multi user syste
>> How can this be done for the panel applet?
>>
>
> apt-get install gksu-polkit
The idea to set SUID results from the fact, that there is no PolicyKit
for Hardy. SUID is made for such cases. The probable security risk for a
multi user system is, that some user could harm the system, but
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if /etc/hdparm.conf accepts wildcards, but I'd hazard a
> guess that
> /dev/discs/disc*/disc {
>spindown_time = 240
> }
> may be a good default for 64studio.
>
>
> No, I don't want the disk drive that I'm usin
Robin Gareus wrote:
I'm not sure if /etc/hdparm.conf accepts wildcards, but I'd hazard a
guess that
/dev/discs/disc*/disc {
spindown_time = 240
}
may be a good default for 64studio.
No, I don't want the disk drive that I'm using is being turned off, even
if I
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
but making hard disks sleep is a PITA on Linux,
>>> indeed.
>>>
> Really? I have I used this ability under Linux for the better part of a
> decade.
>> :(
still, setting it up properly is not trivial.
hdparm doesn't work on ma
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> AppArmor and a firewall are redundant? The phrase "defense in depth" is
> not just a sales term, every level needs to be protected. Microsoft
> understands this as well, perhaps better than most.
If AppArmor and a Firewall are needed, than I can't understand that they
ar
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Michael Jarosch wrote:
>>
>>> Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>>>
There might be a better way to do it.
>>> There will be a better way to do it
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> I did not know that AMD could do this, perhaps they got something right with
> AM2 after all.
I never monitored that my AM2 Athlon does or does not an independent
control of the frequency scaling for each core, it seems to be, that it
doesn't do it.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Michael Jarosch wrote:
>>
>>> Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>>>
There might be a better way to do it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> but making hard disks sleep is a PITA on Linux,
>>>
>> indeed.
>>
Really? I have I used this ability under Linux for the better part of a
decade.
>
> :(
>
>>> hdparm doesn't work on many machines, so the hard
>>> di
Robin Gareus wrote:
> ask for a password to change the governor would IMHO be
> the preferable solution.
The panel will run the applet without asking for the password, running
the latest chosen performance, even if sessions would not be restored
and I only would need to give a password, if I will
Robin Gareus wrote:
> Michael Jarosch wrote:
>
>> Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 14:09 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
>>
>>
>>> I never switch these anyway. Just using 'ondemand' is sufficient. It's
>>> got the best powersaving and no impact on performance (at least not on
>>> Intel CPUs).
>>>
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael Jarosch wrote:
>
>> Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>>
>>> There might be a better way to do it.
>>>
>> There will be a better way to do it: Later versions (but certainly
Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 14:09 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
>
>> I never switch these anyway. Just using 'ondemand' is sufficient. It's
>> got the best powersaving and no impact on performance (at least not on
>> Intel CPUs).
>
> We discussed that issue on the 64studio-l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>> There might be a better way to do it.
>
> There will be a better way to do it: Later versions (but certainly not
> that of 8.04) of the "Frequency Scaling Monitor
Dave Phillips wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>
>> Hi Shantie,
>>
>>
>>
>>> What program can work with Linux to do Lightscribe labels
>>>
>>>
>> This is possible, but I never tested it because I believe the software
>> is proprietary, and so we haven't considered it for our d
Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 14:09 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
> I never switch these anyway. Just using 'ondemand' is sufficient. It's
> got the best powersaving and no impact on performance (at least not on
> Intel CPUs).
We discussed that issue on the 64studio-list several time ago and (I
guess
Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Shantie,
>
>
>> What program can work with Linux to do Lightscribe labels
>>
>
> This is possible, but I never tested it because I believe the software
> is proprietary, and so we haven't considered it for our distro:
>
> http://lightscribe.com/downloadSection/linu
>> http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10803
>>
>>
>
> I don't know this one.
>
I visited the link. It seems to be the same as for the other link. 32Bit
seems to be required. If you need 64Bit you should run Suse or better
stay at 64 Studio :) and don't use LightScribe :(.
Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Shantie,
>
>
>> What program can work with Linux to do Lightscribe labels
>>
>
> This is possible, but I never tested it because I believe the software
> is proprietary, and so we haven't considered it for our distro:
>
> http://lightscribe.com/downloadSection/linu
Hi Shantie,
> What program can work with Linux to do Lightscribe labels
This is possible, but I never tested it because I believe the software
is proprietary, and so we haven't considered it for our distro:
http://lightscribe.com/downloadSection/linux/index.aspx
http://www.lacie.com/products/p
Hi Quentin,
> I'll speak to Daniel to see if we can start a "community team" that will
> focus on work on the free distro only.
That would be one way to do it, although a fix in a particular package
tends to help all distros that use it, including our commercial projects.
The main problem at t
Robin Gareus wrote:
> try 'opera' [on Linux] ;)
A very comfortable and very, very quick browser, while Firefox is
veery slw, even without extensions. I used Opera some time ago
on Linux. I only have the IE for a Windows installation and in addition
to this only an admin account, bec
I did it with Iceweasel on my 64 Studio 2.1 Etch and it worked, but when
I received the email from Steinberg with Thunderbird on 64 Studio
3.0-beta3, this was detected as spam, sometimes other innocuous mails
are also detected as spam, but I never trained Thunderbird to detect
those mails as sp
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I tried to get VST by
> http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/3rd_party_developer.html.
> Even if I'm not fine with giving Steinberg all the wanted data, I tried
> to give them all data without faking any of the data, but it didn't work
> with Firefox. No extension's banned a
Didn't came through the list
Original Message
Subject:VST
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:21:44 +0200
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: 64 Studio Users <64studio-users@lists.64studio.com>
I tried to get VST by
http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/3rd_party_developer.html.
Even
I tried to get VST by
http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/3rd_party_developer.html.
Even if I'm not fine with giving Steinberg all the wanted data, I tried
to give them all data without faking any of the data, but it didn't work
with Firefox. No extension's banned anything, cookies etc. were all
Robin Gareus wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>
>>> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>>
>>>
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> I don't think so. Why do you think SUID needs to be set? Setting SUID
> is a very bad thing, even if you think you "ne
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Robin Gareus wrote:
>> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>>>
I don't think so. Why do you think SUID needs to be set? Setting SUID
is a very bad thing, even if you think you "need" it.
>>> To chose by click between 'Ondemand' and
Robin Gareus wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think so. Why do you think SUID needs to be set? Setting SUID
>>> is a very bad thing, even if you think you "need" it.
>>>
>>>
>> To chose by click between 'Ondemand' and 'Performance' for a use
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> I don't think so. Why do you think SUID needs to be set? Setting SUID
>> is a very bad thing, even if you think you "need" it.
>>
>
> To chose by click between 'Ondemand' and 'Performance' for a user
> session by using the GNOME panel applet 'CP
Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>
>> There might be a better way to do it.
>>
>
> There will be a better way to do it: Later versions (but certainly not
> that of 8.04) of the "Frequency Scaling Monitor Applet" will support
> "policy kit
Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> There might be a better way to do it.
There will be a better way to do it: Later versions (but certainly not
that of 8.04) of the "Frequency Scaling Monitor Applet" will support
"policy kit". For now, there is no better way than settin
34 matches
Mail list logo
