No I just wanted to be sure that there would be no problems when I go to
load that on a server running terminal Services
-Original Message-
From: John B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [ActiveDir] VNC
Speaking of VNC, has anyone tried UltraVNC which can use native NT
security for the initial logon?
http://ultravnc.sourceforge.net/
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:38 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE:
I am in the process of setting up Exchange
2000 on one of our DC's and when I finish the install and reboot, I receive
an error that a service failed to load. The Exchange information store
is the service that will not start. I did some searches on the error and
found little info. I tried
right
-Original Message-
From: Granatella Adam J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:50 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services
You are going to try this in a test environment before putting it on your
is you
DC a GC? Exchange needs a GC on the same LAN.
-Original Message-From: John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:58
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir]
OT: Exchange 2000I am in
the process of setting up Exchange
Title: Message
John,
Is
this asingle domain of a sub of a root domain? What kind of errors did you
got? We need some more info to be able to help you out.
I have
not seen this error before.
Fred
-Original Message-From: John
Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
what errors
in the eventlog?
-Original Message-From: Van Donk, Fred
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003
10:32 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000
John,
Is
this asingle domain of a sub of a
Aren't there a lot of issues with installing vnc onto any type of win 2k
server?
---
For very important
The reason I am putting it on a DC is
because this is a development network and we are limited on our hardware
that we have. I am not worried to much about performance since this is
development work. I am using this for a project that I have for a distributed
computing class. I dont have much
First of all - out of personal preference - -I would NOT put Exch on a DC in AD.
Just my preference - but I wouldn't do it. Too much going on --- on both the DC and on
the mail server
-Original Message-
From: John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
MS does not support it! If that is a concern.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Prajapati,
Ashok (London)
Sent: 21 January 2003 16:39
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services
Aren't there a lot of issues
I have seen something similar to this
before. I had installed Exchange2k and rebooted the server. The
services would fail to start and I could not start them manually. I ended
up re-installing everything on the box and tried rebooting again, same thing
happened. I reinstalled a third time
Title: Message
I
thought Exchange 2k had to be a installed on adomain controller? Do
you have Anti-Virus software installed on this machine?
-Original Message-From: Travis Riddle
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:27
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
Hi,
For those who have performed incremental parallel NT4 to W2k migrations
with ADMT:
We are using ADMTv2 to migrate users pc accounts over a 5-6 month period,
then migrating servers afterward. During this time, we'll be performing
day-to-day user group administration in the NT4
That statement is all relative to actual server load and site requirements.
As the design criteria may suit your organisation a lot would not agree
Cheers
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: 21 January 2003 16:28
Title: Message
I've had the same problem as well, but it
was with SP3, after another re-install I applied SP3 right after xchange and it
worked fine.
-Original Message-From: Travis Riddle
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:27
PMTo: [EMAIL
Title: Message
Actually it is recommended that Exchange
is not installed on a DC. I am now using McAfee GroupShield for antivirus,
however at the time I had not installed any antivirus as the server was a new
installation.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Schlegel
[mailto:[EMAIL
If it is installed now - I would disable it and go to SP3 - reboot then re-enable it.
-Original Message-
From: Travis Riddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 1/21/2003 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE:
I had a similar problem with the store not booting.
It requires NNTP to host mailboxes. Once I loaded NNTP, it worked like a
charm.
Marc Zukerman
- Original Message -
From:
Travis Riddle
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:27
PM
Subject:
That's why I precedded it with out of personal preference
A lot depends on whether or not you should or shouldn't place Ex2K on a DC or not:
* if you have the resources
*ROI
*netwok bottlenecking
this list could get pretty long brother
-Original Message-
From:
Could be that the Exchange services are starting before the machine's DC/GC
services are up and running? As mentioned, Exchange won't start if it can't
find a GC server. Is there another DC/GC on the network? Is DNS working
ok?
Can you start the services manually after boot? If you can then
MessageBryan Schlegel writes:
I thought Exchange 2k had to be a installed on a domain controller?
Nope.
All the best,
A
-Original Message-
From: Travis Riddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange
Like?
-Original Message-
From: Prajapati, Ashok (London) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] VNC and Terminal Services
Aren't there a lot of issues with installing vnc onto any type of win 2k
server?
Sorry for the vague details. Here is
how everything is setup.
I have one Win2k DC, it is running SP3
and has all updated patches. The server is a DC, has GC and all FSMO roles.
SQL 2000 is installed and running SP2. DNS is working properly as well.
I also have NAV corporate edition 7.51
Me and my web administrator who is the programmer around here needs your
held.
If I specify the child domain:
set ADS = getObject(LDAP://DC=Child,DC=Domain,DC=Com;)
It only returns the object as domainDNS and will not list any child
objects..
If I bind to the child using the Global
Me and my web administrator who is the programmer around here needs your
held.
If I specify the child domain:
set ADS = getObject(LDAP://DC=Child,DC=Domain,DC=Com;)
It only returns the object as domainDNS and will not list any child
objects..
If I bind to the child using the Global Catalog:
Its binding to a DC in the domain of the current security context, probably
something in the root domain? So you're getting the domainDNS object from a
replica of the root domain NC, and there are no subordinate objects in that
NC. If you specify the DN of the object you *really* want to bind to,
That's how I feel, however, I've recently been asked about having the DC's perform
other uses, such as data storage (basically an I/O box for transfering data while
staging client systems). Does anyone have any real-world examples of why this should
not be done? Pointers to any documenation
I would have to say if your company can afford it dedicated servers are preferable in
any situation.
-Original Message-
From: Neceda,Thomas W - LGCRP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Other
Common sense tidbit #1: Security... A DC contains the keys to the kingdom,
and reducing the applications running on a DC reduces the surface area
exposed to attack.
-gil
-Original Message-
From: Neceda,Thomas W - LGCRP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:20 PM
I was just about to say the same thing; DC's are much easier to compromise
with extra services and features loaded up on them.
As Scotty would say, Aye sir, the more they overtake the plumbing,
the easier it is to stop up the drain.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick
It also could limit your upgrade/patch policy. Other applications
coexisting on DCs could prevent or limit implementiing apatch until it was
tested with those apps. It could affect a windows 2003 upgrade. It could
also affect your backup/restore/diaster recovery policy.
Title: Message
Hi, I'm posting in
here, in case there is something with ADSI/LDAP I can use to fix this
problem..?
We have always had
two SMTP addresses for each user's mailbox.
For some reason, my
ADC has changed all my users Primary SMTP (reply to) address to alais@domain.com instead of
True.
But, Dell sure seems to as an integral piece of their server management
and DRAC offerings - and yes, on Windows 2000.
FWIW...
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
-Original
After a number of years of forced planning for saving money, we've
finally been able to convince upper Management that the Production
uptime that they complain is suffering because a given server is down is
directly related to combining services on servers to save money.
It is a wonderful thing
We have just upgraded our single domain to AD. Previously, in NT system
policies, we could specify a desktop and start menu (used in student labs).
I don't see how to accomplish this with gpo's. Folder redirection doesn't
sound like the same thing, more to do with saving files on a share, than
Title: Message
Id say that your
default recipient policy wasnt changed. Out of the box it uses the alias for its
name generation.
Assuming your email
addresses got overwritten and they arent in there as secondary smtp addresses I
would try the following
Read this first
Title: Message
Steve,
The
issue is probably related to your recipient policies. Try
this:
Start
the Exchange System Manager--Recipients--Recipient Policies. There will
probably be two policies, one based on your new (I assume new) Exchange 2000
install and one based on your existing
Title: Message
Anyone
have any good info on how to set up a VPN. I've never had to do so and I was
trying to find some howto article and perhaps another explaining the security
risks. Also dose anyone know what ports I need to forward from the firewall for
it? Or should this be in the DMZ?
Does anyone know of any big security
issues with Ultra VNC or any other VNC products. Ultra VNC looks like a
good product. We currently use PCAnywhere 10.5 and it is not cheap. I am
trying to find ways to save my org some software costs.
Thanks
John
Hicks | KEMET
Electronics Corporation |
Title: Message
John,
Though
I haven't done exhaustive studies on VNC (talk to me again in a week or so - I
just got hit up at work that areas want to deploy - now it's my deal to
saygo or no-go...), like most anything, locking it down and governing the
usage is a combination of policy and
41 matches
Mail list logo
