Actually, my malady is contagious :)
It's 4.7MB. I did not want to believe it would be that small when I first
look at it, that was why I was confused. But, from what I am reading, I can
see it's so small.
By the way, this does not appear to me to be any different from running LINUX
under a typ
I looked at it, and my eyes (almost) popped out. Is that really a 4.7Gig
distro, or am I hallucinating - again? :)
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow y
Dissecting
>>> Its Vancouver in March...
Yeah, so? Can't be much worse than MI in March.
>>> I am pretty tied up with
Lame, so lame I'm tempted to not comment :) I am sure most presenters are in
the same boat. I am personally in that boat. I am not even sure HOW I will
get to DEC yet, be
Hyena is not free, but it is not THAT expensive. Permcopy is a free reskit,
IIRC.
You could use either xcacls or robocopy for the ACL. I have seen both of them
hiccup before, so I can't say one is better than the other. But, since you
are using robocopy to copy the files anyway, why not use the b
Yes. The syntax is a bit different, but it will work. Just read the readme
doc
Actually, my original response should have been
Robocopy
Robocopy + Hyena (for share permission}
Robocopy itself will do the NTFS re-ACLing and you would then use Hyena to
copy the shares and share permissions
Robocopy + xcacls
Robocopy + Hyena
Robocopy + prayers (lots of it :))
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
Are you on IM?
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] o
> sales.charmer.com
Server: ns1.akomolafe.com
Address: 66.92.14.146
sales.charmer.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger =
mta1.sales.charmer.com
mta1.sales.charmer.com internet address = 208.234.241.112
>
I can get an A record now as well, and I can get them from webserver1
I think yo
Top-posting, bottom-posting, I think it's all a matter of preference. I, for
one, don't find bottom-posting useful, and I am not one to flame anyone for
doing either. I just mentioned it to you because it makes it easier for me to
follow the thread properly.
Now, the output you gave me for sales.
Red Wine (and Steak), maybe. Definitely NOT RedHat :0
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
Joe is just being well Joe. I don't think it's so much because he
can't "think" of what to present as it is deciding on which of the numerous
things he CAN present he should present.
Something tells me, though, that if you can get Dean over to DEC (and make
sure he brings his laptop), J
Let's reboot.
Describe what you are trying to do
Describe your setup (who is the NS? Which client are you testing from, what
is the output of ipconfig /all from that client?)
What do you get, and how is that different from your expectation?
What is the response when you do the following:
nslookup
You get all the docs if you download SP1.
If you are not into that, then you can get it here:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C3C26254-8CE3-46E2-B
1B6-3659B92B2CDE&displaylang=en
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.r
According to webserver1.charmer.com, webserver1.charmer.com is THE NS for
both Charmer.com and sales.charmer.com
According to the output you've just posted webserver1.charmernydom.csg-it.net
According to the world, webserver1.charmernydom.csg-it.net does not exist
According to webserver1.char
Jimmy always sees his shadow around this time - Summit must be around the
corner :-p
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterda
Without pointing fingers, or mentioning "short" names, here's my stance on
sniffing traffic for diagnosis. It is a GREAT concept IF you know what you
are looking for. Merely firing up Netmon/Ethereal and such will not be
productive without the necessary capabilities to discern and interpret the
tra
You are forgetting that you can't use the %username% variable in the startup
script successfully since the script is processed before the logon is
initiated and, as such, before that variable holds anything. I ran into this
a while back and smack into the 4-by-clue :)
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé
You create a new delegation and specify the IP Address of the BIND server.
Wizard will do it. Scripts will do it. You don't NEED to hack any boot file.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now
Don't you have a tool to write or something? :p
Yeah, I know. It's cold in MI and you are stuck in the house. Can't do
anything "with shorts on" for the next couple of months ;)
You are right, though - as always. I just didn't feel the need to go into
that much details. Experience has taught me
>> I am not too happy with this solution as I believe there may be a way to
set this up on the Exchange server itself.
You and a lot of others. But, this is what you are stuck with for the time
being.
>> I would like to disable the user's domain account for security reasons
Don't disable the acco
No way, Hunter!
C:\Documents and Settings\deji>adfind -default -f
"&(objectcategory=person)(msNPAllowDialin=TRUE)" samaccountname
'adfind' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
program or batch file.
ROFL
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MC
http://www.readymaids.com/Portals/1/Find%20Users%20allowed%20to%20use%20VPN.t
xt
Enjoy - and remember to thank Hunter :)
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the To
Since the account is gone, there is nothing to translate it to. Unless it is
one of the well-known (built-in) groups, I think you are SOL :)
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize th
When you build an offline recovery server, you'd want to do it "offline".
Away from the existing exchange infrastructure. That is the way I've done it
and seen it done, so I've tended to assume that it is "best practice". You do
not want to restore into the same environment. The good news is that y
If you have to resort to lmhosts and hosts files in a 2K3/2K environment,
something wrong with DNS. Ahem... now that I have demonstrated that I am a
genius at stating the obvious. :-p
Let's comment out the entries you put in those files and configure the DCs to
not use lmhosts (in TCP/IP prop
With apologies to the original poster, I would like to hijack this thread and
respond to Frank's idea on this:
DNS - If you use AD integrated DNS for your AD domains (I did), make sure
that each of your child DCs has a standard secondary of the TLD _msdcs zone
and then have the clients use their
Will this do? http://www.readymaids.com/Portals/1/userprof-xcacls.txt
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
Are you sure that the service is not auto-restarting itself? Look at the
service's properties. The NTBACKUP line should finish ALL the backup before
going to the next line.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.ako
Join the Beta and find out.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL
If you are doing the backup through a batch script, then after the backup is
completed, it should return to the next line in the batch script. Is that
what you are asking?
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akom
I think your problem is that you probably upgraded the DC at that site last
and, before the upgrade, your XP and 2K clients had discovered the new 2K3
DCs at the remote site. Once XP and 2K clients discover and authenticate
against a 2K or 2K3 DC, they usually don't go back. This may be what you ar
cconnect was not fully developed, IMO. I think it was abandoned in the middle
of development. I have never met or heard of anyone who has successfully
implemented it.
Senthil, you said you want to "limit one person to one workstation". You
don't need cconnect or any fancy tool to do that. You sho
Bawo ni, Omo iya :)
First, this does not appear to be an E2K issue. Second, there is no MX for
vmobile-nigeria.com or econet-nigeria.com. Third, a sum total of the first 2
is thatyou are relaying through MessageWall and it is hte one throwing the
error.
Being unfamiliar with MessageWall, I can'
You must also delegate the "Write Account Restrictions" rights before the
users can toggle this box.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worrie
Not to crash the party or anything like that. Here's a rule I use for
figuring out my 2K3 DNS configuration.
In an Intra-Forest Parent-Child relationship:
Create parent.whatever zone on Parent DNS server
Create child.parent.whatever on Child DNS Server
Delegate child.parent.whatever to Child DNS
>>>B) if he does not.start from the scratch...create all the users with
same user names as they had before
>>>either way there would not be any down time as the users should be able to
login to the cached profiles.
Pardon the interruption, but .. I don't believe this is feasible for
MAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Manjeet
Sent: Wed 1/12/2005 7:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Inbound mail NDR
Deji,
The newly cretaed user hasno problem in sending mail to internal accounts,
and also can send mail to internet (yahoo). but if I reply the same message
Domain Rename has actually evolved and matured since those initial days. It's
easier and better thought-through now. Having said that, it is NOT easy and I
agree that it should be on the tail end of your alternatives.
As to your question regarding ADMT, ADMT will migrate your computer accounts
ve
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Manjeet
Sent: Wed 1/12/2005 7:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Inbound mail NDR
Deji,
The newly cretaed user hasno problem in sending mail to internal accounts,
and also can send mail to internet (yahoo). but if
o you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Manjeet
Sent: Wed 1/12/2005 7:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Inbound mail NDR
Hi Deji,
Thanks for your p
It looks like you are going through Postini. I think it's time to call their
support.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday
No, Dean. You are all alone in your own little "stubby" world :o)
Actually, I use Stubs, especially in the scenario Guido described. I wouldn't introduce CF or secondaries in that situation.
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.c
Without disagreeing with any of the points you made, don't you think multi-forest deployment is an "overkill" for what he's trying to achieve?
Let's look at the SOW again:
The motivations for considering another forest are the following:
1) we have some remote sites with workstations that a
Unless something has changed in the Password Filter implementation lately, I believe that Computer password changes do not hit the PasswordFilter. At least, that routine did not get called when using the passfilt I got from MS a long time ago. I haven't used this lately and the behavior may have
>>> by using selective authentication (SA).
Which, in order words, means that SEPARATE FOREST does not in itself protect you from an internal "clever domain admin" in any of the domains/forest. Unless you go through the troubles SID filtering, SA, and other ACLing. And, even with all that in p
Could you try something like this:
Set wshShell = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
usrName = wshShell.ExpandEnvironmentStrings("%USERNAME%")Set usr = GetObject("WinNT://NetBIOSDomainName/" & usrName & ",user")
For Each grp In usr.Groups
If grp.Name = "HR" Then Do Something Exit For
I had issues like this a long time ago in my previous life, and I think I had to change the code to use the WinNT provider instead of LDAP to get it working. I can't remember the specifics now, but you may want to try that. I will post more if I can find the code in question, or if I see yours f
"Users, objects, etc" does not really say much :) There are more things in an AD than just those, and you will need to take them into accounts in making your decisions. For example, Exchange (hence mailboxes, DLs, PFs, Recippient Policies and namespace, routing, calendars, and oh yeah e
afe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Manjeet
Sent: Mon 12/20/2004 5:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Storage Limit Change in AD
Hi Deji,
Tha
It depends (TM)
Ordinarily, you will be controlling this setting at the Store level. If this
is what you are doing, then all you will need to do is create another mailbox
store, set the Limit the way you want and move all the 600 mailboxes to that
new store. They will then inherit the new setting
Have you tried www.eventid.net ?
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [
#x27;'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
I know that you said "no scripting knowledge, but if you can take hints, this
should help:
http://www.readymaids.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=userprof-xcacls.txt&mid=431
You are welcome
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we kno
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
''''&
Either way would work for you. I am not aware of a mandated "best practice"
that would invalidate one option or the other.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the To
This is just a pseudo-code...
objCommand.CommandText = "Select mail from 'LDAP://DC=Domain,DC=com'"
Set objRecordSet = objCommand.Execute
objRecordSet.MoveFirst
Do Until objRecordSet.EOF
objemailAddy = objRecordSet.Fields("mail").Value
If instr(lcase(objemailAddy), "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") > 0
>>I would like for our internal AD DNS to only host records for our internal
systems and forward any other unresolved requests
When a DNS server is told that it is authoritative for a zone, it takes that
responsibility seriously. This means that it considers ANYTHING that is not
in that zone non-
"Lost another Soul to EDNS0" :)
dnscmd /config /enableednsprobes 0
net stop dns & net start dns
Either that, or fix your Router.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today
You can get me offline on MSN IM. deji at iyaburo dot com
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
aids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Noah Eiger
Sent: Wed 12/8/2004 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] The server is not operat
Thanks for putting that into perspective for me. It helps to understand
design requests before saying "yes/no". Having said that, secondarying the
TLD from the Child DCs would be a requirement (must-have) IF there are no TLD
DNS servers at the local site. I know that this is a common scenario, and
Noah elger wrote
RRAS is running (only for me to make a PPTP connection over which I run
RD).
Due to RRAS, the server registers another A record and SRV record in DNS (for
the VPN interface). DNS also shows that it is servicing requests on that
address. ...
And I replied ..
I com
I have been away for a while and have not been following this conversation
closely, so excuse me if I missed some of the relevant conversation.
Looking at what you've written, I do not understand what the purpose of this
exercise would be.
If you have a parent-child topology, and you configure
Did you look here?
http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/19826/19826.html
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -
I don't use sysprep. I just use newsid from sysinternals. Then I edit the
.vmc to reflect the new VS name/location. I'm that lazy.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today i
>>Why is it not a good idea to store zone data in AD?
For the simple fact that I can use it as a vector to introduce malicious
contents into the secondarying AD.
>>Why not exploit a modern replication engine?
modern, legacy. Does it really matter which one we go through?
>>The admin. overhead to
because I didn't think you could. Are you sure you could AD-intg
conditionally-forwarded zones? They are not "real" zones in the normal sense,
mind you.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you no
t MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dean Wells
Sent: Fri 11/19/2004 8:24 AM
To: Send - AD mailing
How many new DCs are you adding per day/week/month? :) If I were doing this,
Stub or Secondaries would take a back-seat. I would be investing in
Conditional Forwarding. I would have all my other DNS servers forward
unresolved queries to one or (ideally) 2 of MY DNS servers. On those 2
designated D
AM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Why no AD integrated DNS secondary zones?
Deji,
There would a concept of "AD integrated secondaries" had MS decided to write
it; it may be desirable (to some) to maintain read-only yet AD replicated
zones. I guess the point i
Because when it's integrated, there is no concept of "secondaries" as we
understood it to be in pre-2Kx world. It's there in AD, and any DC can see
and write to it. Now, if you are secondarying the zones on another server
located in another forest/network, why would you want to store that info in
y
>>This is not a problem with 2K3 DNS.
Depends on how you define "problem" ownership. 2K3 DNS implements EDNS0 (a
fully RFC-compliant implementation, mind you). However, a number of the
Network equipments were not ready for it. Many are still not compliant. So,
your EDNS0-enabled DNS server is able
I tink it's time to bring out Winternal's ERD Commander or similar tool. I
don't know if Winternals has a trial version, but if you have it, you should
be able to boot all the way into the OS and start the necessary service.
Perhaps you could also try machinename\administrator at the logon prompt
Yes. Local logon should still work.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From
>>1. Loop through all USN's from zero for all objects. I.E. the current USN
is
23000, it asks for a query to return all objects with a USN less than or
equal to 23000. At the end of that processing, it can easily pick up and
gather changes that occurred since the start of the rebuild (i.e. any
obje
Thanks, all. I got in touch with the source of this mandate and all I could
get was the concern that rebuilding will require people to re-download
offline address books.
At this point, I regret to inform you that the concern appears to be more
political (turf protection) than technical. I know I
I have always thought that rebuilding (or updating) the Recipient Update
Services after a reconfiguration of Recipient Policies is a "normal",
non-destructive procedure. I am just now learning that rebuilding RUS is a
"no-no" and must be avoided at all cost. I have not spoken directly to the
"sourc
You did not mention where you are doing the join from. At what point in your
installation? Are the computers remote to you? In any case, look into netdom.
NETDOM JOIN NEWPC /DOMAIN:THISDOMAIN.LOCAL /USERD:BigDude /PASSWORDD:h4ckME
/OU:OU=THISBOTTOMOU,OU=THISTOPOU,DC=THISDOMAIN,DC=LOCAL
NETDOM JOI
yes. read up on loopback.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL P
Make the user's computer a Secure-NAT client by setting its default gateway
to the ISA server's internal IP. Make sure you don't install the Proxy client
on the user's computer. This should work.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.c
Don't blame me. It's the voices in my head ;-p
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
___
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q316792
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
__
I think Mario is looking for http://support.microsoft.com/kb/260370/EN-US/
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
I second that :-p
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
In 2K AD, yes. In 2K3 AD, no. In 2K3, there is the lastlogontimestamp
attribute and this is replicated to all DCs. It's not completely "real-time",
though.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you
Noah, do these event correspond to the time when your VPN servers are
connecting to your network? The last time I saw this, it was coming from VPN
client connections, and the culprit clients usually have invalid "wacky"
characters in their names. The last I heard about this, it is "normal". I
don't
I have no idea why you don't see it, other than to speculate that you prolly
deleted it :o. However, there is a known feature in the W2K RRAS wizard. The "feature" is not just cosmetic. I can
almost swear that there is a KB for it, but I don't have it in my repository
right now, and I don't want t
>>Isn't that only true if you aren't using Windows 200X for DHCP services?
Possibly. I have not personally seen a difference in the behavior, though. I
also do not agree with the document. Test it out, in a lab. Scavenging and
aging confuses me, and I try very hard to get a handle on it. I sugges
Depending on how large your environment is, you may be best served by just
doing regular scavenging as a part of your weekly/bi-weekly/monthly
maintenance. The reason I say this is that the Scavenging option you see in
the GUI is a little bit hard to get a handle on.
dnscmd /startscavenging will
It's an ugly hole. My option would be to have the tool run in the context of
another account (like a service account).
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorr
I don't think there is such tool natively. I imagine that you could put a web
interface on a vbscript where you direct your users to go to when they need
to change their passwords. In the code, you will then put in a routine that
grabs the value they type in and email it to you.
Now, I will get a
I can also vouch for Liberum. I think the development has not moved much for
a long time because the tool does all the things it's supposed to do
beautifully. It meets all the criteria you mentioned in your request and it
does so for free.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microso
Have you been to:
http://www.readymaids.com/Portals/1/Remotely%20change%20DNS%20IP%20on%20multi
ple%20Computers.txt
Enjoy
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the T
Just got my October edition of Windows IT Pro, and guess what I found. One of
the nicest plugs for some of the best AD tools I've ever seen!
Nice work, Robbie. Nicer work, Joe! The tools are now getting the recognition
they deserve. I hope your web-host is robust enough to sustain the mad-rush
fo
simply do a net use * /delete /y and you are good to go
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
__
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Macs, LDAP Source
it's called uptime. As in uptime.exe. It tells me the following:
file://myServer/ has been up for: 93 day(s), 14 hour(s), 19 minute(s), 42 second(s)
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we
as exchange is concerned.
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know ITwww.akomolafe.comDo you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: SvetaSent: Sat 10/16/2004 5:58 PMTo: Deji Akomola
You could name it anything you want. You could call it company.local. Or you could call it company.com. If you call it company.com, be prepared to host and maintain an internal company.com zone, which MUST be separate from your external company.com zone and must not be hosted on the same DNS ser
download secops.exe
(http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=9989
D151-5C55-4BD3-A9D2-B95A15C73E92). It contains eventcombMT which should serve
you well.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know I
ad me wide open and getting hammered
by account enumeration attacks, whereas changing it to a "1" now has my IPC$
share behaving the way I thought it should've been.
The kicker? I can't find any mention of the change in an MS Article (though
Deji or someone will doubtless
601 - 700 of 967 matches
Mail list logo
