:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:22 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging question
Thanks for the input. Luckily for us we do not have any static records, at
least I have not created any but I will check
Check it again.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 8:07 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging question
I was curious about the static record thing with AgeAllRecords. I just tried
Milburn
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 7:07 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging question
I was curious about the static record thing with AgeAllRecords. I just
tried it and it aged my dynamic records but not the static one I had (i.e.
the checkbox to delete
I have a rather off the wall DNS scavenging question.
I have a bunch of DNS records that are stale and need to be scavenged
out of the zone. Following the O'REILLY book: DNS on Windows Server
2003 I have configured aging and scavenging. (Don't ask why this
wasn't done when the zone was first
to be there
that you will need to recreate as static entries ie. www.company.com etc?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:42 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging question
I have
If you immediately (with respect to using the ageall switch) tell the
scavenging server to scavenge all records, wouldn't you expect all the
records to be scavenged at that point? Wouldn't it be better to mark them
all, and wait a cycle or two of refresh prior to pushing the issue?
Otherwise,
records--OK
Hope this will help.please chime in.
-vC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:42 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging question
I have
to
be there that you will need to recreate as static entries ie.
www.company.com etc?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:42 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging
will give it a try
and let everyone know how it turned out.
Dan
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vinnie Cardona
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:12 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging question
You are correct
, December 07, 2006 3:12 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS scavenging question
You are correct.
Due to the fact that aging/scavenging was not enabled the records which were
dynamically registered were not stamped with a date/time. Therefore the
aging/scavenging
The recent thread on DNS scavenging was interesting and
informative. It has lead me to investigate my own DNS
scavenging issue and I'd appreciate some assistance with
figuring out how to resolve it.
I manage a single domain with a mixture of 2 - Win2K
3 - Win2K3 servers. My 2 DC's are on Win2K
is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?
-anon
From: Gordon Pegue
Sent: Wed 11/22/2006 8:57 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging - new issue
The recent thread on DNS scavenging was interesting and
informative. It has lead me to investigate my own DNS
Of Gordon Pegue
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging - new issue
The recent thread on DNS scavenging was interesting and
informative. It has lead me to investigate my own DNS
scavenging issue and I'd appreciate some
for
scavenging as per settings
No - we're done
Make sense?
neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: 16 November 2006 12:32
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
But I just read in the DNS
We're in the middle of an SMS deployment and SMS is making us very aware
that DNS scavenging and WINS tombstoning doesn't appear to be happening
as much as it should. Looking through our DNS records for our domain,
there's like 2 and 3 machine names for one IP. Two of them were tossed
in the
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
We're in the middle of an SMS deployment and SMS is making us very aware
that DNS scavenging and WINS tombstoning doesn't appear to be happening
as much as it should. Looking through our DNS records for our domain,
there's like 2
realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?
-anon
From: Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Wed 11/15/2006 5:03 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
We're in the middle of an SMS deployment and SMS is making us very aware
that DNS scavenging and WINS
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Unless you enable it on a server (or manually initiate it against a
server) nothing's actually being scavenged. The settings on the zone
only allow the timestamps to replicate and defines what records would be
deleted assuming scavenging is run. So until
MVP - Directory Services
www.akomolafe.com - we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?
-anon
From: Roger Longden
Sent: Wed 11/15/2006 7:24 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Correct. When
Hi,Windows 2003 R2 Single Domain/ FFL, AD Intergrated DNSI am thinkingaboutconfiguring DNS Scavenging, I was reading the AD Cookbook and it mentions 'Configure Non Refresh and Refresh Intervals as necessary'What does this mean? what do you normally set your environment to?does this
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
CarterSent: 01 August 2006 09:23To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] DNS
Scavenging
Hi,
Windows 2003 R2 Single Domain/ FFL, AD Intergrated DNS
I am thinkingaboutconfiguring DNS Scavenging, I was reading the
AD Cookbook and it mentions 'Configure Non
/2005 4:42 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Thanks for your response. I have one more question, is the recommended
settings still one hour for no-refresh and 7 days for refresh? This is what I
initially had it set
AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Thanks for your response. I have one more question, is the recommended
settings still one hour for no-refresh and 7 days for refresh? This is
what I initially had it set to but since
: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:12 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Ok, so if using the default DHCP lease time of 8 days, I should have
both the refresh and no-refresh set to 7 days. Once I identify my
static records and I manually age all of the records, I am
: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Hey Tim, I wrote this a while back when I was trying to understand the
whole process. Might help you...
http://myitforum.techtarget.com/articles/16/view.asp?id=6287
:m:dsm:cci:mvp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Glad to hear it. Thanks! :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wright, T. MR
NSSB
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 2:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Marcus,
That article is spot
All,
I
am not 100% sure, but it appears that I may be having some issues with
scavenging old records. I have a Win2003 domain with 5 DC's running 2003
functional level. All of the DC's run DNS and on one of them I enabled
scavening at the server level and configured all zones to have a
First off, you need to be careful with such low no
refresh/refresh intervals since, for example, 2003
computers only refresh their records every 24 hours
(it initially refreshes faster, but it uses
ever-widening intervals until it reaches 24 hours).
For your primary concern, you can enable
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Adner
Sent: Mon 6/27/2005 7:40 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
First off, you need to be careful with such low no
refresh/refresh intervals since, for example, 2003
computers only refresh their records every 24
To All:
Is there a way to script the setting of the Delete this record when it
becomes stale checkbox?
I am attempting to setup a test forest with multiple domains to do some
testing/learning about DNS scavenging. I have found a script that creates
resource records (thank you Robbie
What's the recommended best way to have scavenging set
up? Enable on all your AD integrated DNS servers, or enable on one and let
it replicate to all the others? Also, if our DHCP lease time is 5 days,
would 7 days be an appropriate scavenging
time?
that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Mon 11/8/2004 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
What's the recommended best way to have scavenging set up
to modify the defaults.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spam: Spam: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Depending on how large your environment is, you may
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Mon 11/8/2004 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Spam: Spam: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Isn't that only
)
As Deji already explained: you'll need some asperine after reading and
testing this. ;-))
Regards,
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8-11-2004 18:52
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
Depending on how large your environment is, you may
Hi,
I am in the midst of testing and eventually activating DNS aging and
scavenging for all zones on a particular DNS server (ADI zones).
This server also has a secondary copy of the forest-wide _msdcs zone,
obviously being a secondary zone it should not affect the aging and
scavenging of
]
Sent: Mon 7/19/2004 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and Secondary Zones
Hi,
I am in the midst of testing and eventually activating DNS aging and
scavenging for all zones
Povilaitis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:00
AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging
and DHCP Lease Expiration Times
If
DHCP returns an IP address to the pool for re-use before the A records are
scavenged, then multiple A records will resolve t
Huntington
Hospital
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:
(626) 397-3392
Fax:
(626) 397-2901
-Original Message-
From: Joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003
16:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
Scavenging and DHCP Lease Expiration Times
eg
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003
7:01 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP Lease
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP Lease Expiration Times
Quietly hides the 4 hour lease time on his DHCP scopes
Actually, I advocate the shorter the better, but my environment is predominantly laptops. Between people moving across our subnets, and more often people taking
building wired, dev
building wireless, dev building wired).
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Roger SeielstadSent: Tuesday, September 02,
2003 11:22 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP
D] Phone: (626) 397-3392 Fax: (626)
397-2901
-Original Message-From: Joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003
16:01To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP Lease Expiration
Times
eg
It
is fine until the time DHCP doe
something to consider... raising DHCP lease times instead of lowering DNS
scavenging times.
Thanks Joe...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP Lease Expiration
Times
None that occur to me off the top of my head.
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT
] On Behalf Of Marcus Oh
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP Lease Expiration Times
Hey folks,
Our DNS scavenging cycle is 7 days. Our DHCP leases expire every 3 days.
Are there any notable drawbacks or problems
Thanks for the assistance Rick! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP Lease Expiration Times
None that occur
: Saturday, August 30, 2003 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Scavenging and DHCP Lease Expiration
Times
Thanks for the assistance Rick! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Saturday
Hey folks,
Our DNS scavenging cycle is 7 days. Our DHCP leases expire every 3 days.
Are there any notable drawbacks or problems in changing the DNS scavenging
time period to match the DHCP lease expiration time period?
Thanks!
Marcus
attachment: winmail.dat
49 matches
Mail list logo
