I am having DNS issues.
When I type NSLOOKUP my default server comes up with the correct address.
Then I am getting
*** servername can't find NSLOOKUP: Non-existant domain.
I have two DNS servers: Primary and Secondary.
Windows 2k3.
Thanks in advance.
Rob
List info :
AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
I am having DNS issues.
When I type NSLOOKUP my default server comes up with the correct address.
Then I am getting
*** servername can't find NSLOOKUP: Non-existant domain.
I have two DNS servers: Primary and Secondary
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
I am having DNS issues.
When I type NSLOOKUP my default server comes up with the correct address.
Then I am getting
*** servername can't find NSLOOKUP: Non-existant domain.
I have two DNS servers: Primary and Secondary.
Windows 2k3.
Thanks in advance
: dinsdag 15 februari 2005 18:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
Jorge,
I killed both servers and am now starting fresh. I'm going to install
W2k3 on them, get AD/DNS on one server and DNS on the other. Do you have
any suggestions for steps I should take?
Rob
in Virginia.
Thanks for your help Jorge.
Rob
From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/15 Tue PM 12:27:10 EST
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
Hi Rob,
Why not install AD/DNS on both servers?
Steps you could take:
* Install
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 February 2005 17:42
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
Thanks so much Jorge.
I am finishing the last server now. I the IP structure in place.
I will get DNS running on both
wanted to go from
scratch.
Any advice?
Rob
From: Ruston, Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/15 Tue PM 12:50:08 EST
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org' ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
Sorry to barge in here, but wasn't the original issue simply due
to go from
scratch.
Any advice?
Rob
From: Ruston, Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/15 Tue PM 12:50:08 EST
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org' ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
Sorry to barge in here, but wasn't the original issue simply due
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 15 februari 2005 18:42
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
Thanks so much Jorge.
I am finishing the last server now. I the IP structure in place.
I will get DNS running on both
to accomplish
that
Greetz,
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil
Sent: dinsdag 15 februari 2005 18:50
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues
Sorry to barge in here, but wasn't the original issue
]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
By default, DNS queries are done over UDP. UDP is stateless - and therefore
there is no automatic reverse allow created by firewalls. So what's
happening is that you're probably failing the UDP request because the
response can't come back in to the DNS server
Are you using Cisco PIX's?
Windows 2000 DNS uses abnormal sized dns packets (too big), and the
PIX's block them. There is a patch for the pix ISO, or there is a a
patch from MS to change the size. This is not a problem with 2K3 DNS.
Jordan
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:47:43 -0600, Rimmerman, Russ
No, Juniper Netscreens
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jordan Arendt
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Are you using Cisco PIX's?
Windows 2000 DNS uses abnormal sized
]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Are you using Cisco PIX's?
Windows 2000 DNS uses abnormal sized dns packets (too big), and the
PIX's block them. There is a patch for the pix ISO, or there is a a
patch from MS to change the size. This is not a problem with 2K3 DNS.
Jordan
On Tue, 16 Nov
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Perdue David J Contr InDyne/Enterprise IT
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 8:38 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Win2k DNS used a random port in addition to port 53 for DNS
resolution. I don't know if Win2k3
to
our DNS servers from the outside?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
TCP shouldn't be an issue - since most firewalls
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
I saw something similar with checkpoint firewalls. In
particular the NG Versions
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Kruse
HansenSent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 1:09 AMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
TCP or UDP through the firewall?
What have you done to troubleshoot? Logs? ??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 5:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Our Win2k DNS servers are on our internal network. I have a
rule allowing
53 tcp and 53 udp outbound
Since changing our DNS design from forwarding to our old firewall which
had root-hints built into it, to forwarding our DNS to our empty forest root
domain controllers with the root-hints on them, we are not getting all our DNS
lookups.
For example, http://www.volksbanksalzburg.at right
PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Since changing our DNS design from
forwarding to our old firewall which had root-hints built into it, to
forwarding our DNS to our empty forest root domain controllers with the
root-hints on them, we are not getting all our DNS lookups
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Since changing our DNS design from forwarding to our old firewall which had
root-hints built into it, to forwarding our DNS to our empty forest root
domain controllers with the root-hints on them, we
-hints, and the
firewall allows them out port 53.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
RutherfordSent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 7:53 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
Issues
Id advise using
forwarding for the functions you require.
It may
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
Issues
Yes, all DNS is working fine except for
some rare instances of hostnames we've run into. Last week we couldn't
get to ftp.nai.com but now we can. All
our workstations are pointed to our child DCs for DNS. They are set to
forward to our empty root DCs
TCP or UDP through the firewall?
What have you done to troubleshoot? Logs? ??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Yes, all
: [ActiveDir] DNS
Issues
Since changing our DNS design from forwarding to our old firewall which
had root-hints built into it, to forwarding our DNS to our empty forest root
domain controllers with the root-hints on them, we are not getting all our DNS
lookups.
For example, http
root DNS.
Rick Kingslan
Windows Server Directory Services
MVP
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004
7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
Since changing our DNS design from
root fwd to the main DNS
servers.
Roger SeielstadE-mail Geek MS-MVP
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman,
RussSent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:48 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS
Issues
Since changing our DNS
Issues
TCP or UDP through the firewall?
What have you done to troubleshoot? Logs? ??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues
We experienced the same exact problem , when we upgraded to W3K DNS. Check out kb828731. It deals with Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) .
-Original Message-
From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16. november 2004 16:41
To: [EMAIL
Title: DNS Issues - ipconfig /flushdns
When you do a ipconfig /displaydns what is
the TTL for the incorrect values?
From: Tashildar,
Dinesh (Cognizant) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:40
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
Issues
for the
local caches to flush.
From: Tashildar,
Dinesh (Cognizant) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:15
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Issues -
ipconfig /flushdns
When we moved desktop from one location to another location
(lets say from
Title: DNS Issues - ipconfig /flushdns
It takes 2-3 days..
From: Passo, Larry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:57
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
DNS Issues - ipconfig /flushdns
When you say it always
shows old ip address how long are you waiting
ow realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: Mulnick, AlSent: Tue 5/18/2004 2:30 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] dns issues
WINS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, Ma
Message-
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 5/19/2004 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] dns issues
More likely DNS than WINS. Trying bouncing the new Server, then restart
netlogon
between client and
dc (same subnet, across a wan, etc.)
Hope this is a helpful start!
~Eric
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:20
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] dns
issues
i bounced the server
WINS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 5:17 PM
To: ActiveDir (E-mail)
Subject: [ActiveDir] dns issues
I had my primary fsmo role holder(pdc,infra,rid) go down. It was also a dns
server(ad intergrated
: [ActiveDir] dns issues
WINS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 5:17 PM
To: ActiveDir (E-mail)
Subject: [ActiveDir] dns
I have a problem with my DNS over the WAN and VPN. Here is the
issue. For some reason DNS will not resolve names over the WAN, or
VPN. I can only connect to resources by IP address. This problem
started when I upgraded my network in January. We switched to a Cisco IP
phone system along
]Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS issues?
I
have a problem with my DNS over the WAN and VPN. Here is the issue.
For some reason DNS will not resolve names over the WAN, or VPN. I can
only connect to resources by IP address. This problem started when I
upgraded my network in January. We switched to a Cisco
: [ActiveDir] DNS issues?
I
have a problem with my DNS over the WAN and VPN. Here is the issue.
For some reason DNS will not resolve names over the WAN, or VPN. I can
only connect to resources by IP address. This problem started when I
upgraded my network in January. We switched to a Cisco
PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS issues?
I
have a problem with my DNS over the WAN and VPN. Here is the
issue. For some reason DNS will not resolve names over the WAN, or
VPN. I can only connect to resources by IP address. This problem
started when I upgraded my network
**
-Original Message-From: Todd L. Graham
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 5:30
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir]
DNS issues?
I
have a problem with my DNS over the WAN and VPN. Here is the
issue. For some reason DNS
ocal
info.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Todd L. Graham
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:30
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
issues?
When
you say you're getting the correct DNS servers, what do you mean?
Also,
are you replicating DNS zones for the child domains between sites? It strikes
me like what's really happening is that your child domains don't hold each
replicating zones, are your
transferring them both directions?
Lots of questions, but need more answers to figure this out
better.
Al
From: Todd L. Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:51 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS issues?
When I do an IP
Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Todd L. Graham
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:51
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] DNS issues?
When I do an IP config
Im getting the correct IP addresses listed for the DNS servers. DNS is
set to have
47 matches
Mail list logo
