I like SCSI and IDE not only for their proven track record
[server and desktop respectively] but because the dang cables
don't get knocked off each time I reach into the case. Those
cable connections on the back of the SATA drives are a little
worrying. I've accidentally bumped the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Rochford
Sent: 08 November 2005 08:49
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
I can understand that with a home machine you're going to be
taking
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org,ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:36:10 -
I've deployed SATA for storage of large files in Apple XRaid units in a
Raid 5+1 config, and so
components at a time.)
From: Rob MOIR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org,ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:36:10 -
I've deployed SATA for storage of large files
to need
to be emptied.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Rochford
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ASB
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:13 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
~
I don't have a problem with SATA (an upgrade from PATA) if used as designed.
It's
..well.. a drive in a member server dropped off the raid the other day
and I had to open up a box and replace a SCSI drive.
And quite frankly those SATA connections 'on' the drive feel flimsy
enought to snap off if I'm not careful, or not solid enough that a
Calfornia earthquake would jolt
@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:13:22 -0500
~
I don't have a problem with SATA (an upgrade from PATA) if used as
designed.
It's designed for desktop storage. Not that it can't
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA
aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 10:33 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
I've seen the SAN vendors these days include SATA drives.
Al Mulnick wrote
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 6:50 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Add to that - SATA is not for the desktop only. Check out some of the SAN
coming out from most
] On Behalf Of ASB
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:13 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
~
I don't have a problem with SATA (an upgrade from PATA) if used as designed.
It's designed for desktop storage. Not that it can't
that it's on a case by case basis.
Al
From: Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:55:32 -0500
I know our Clariion has shelves with 14x320GB raw storage
: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Rick Kingslan wrote:
Add to that - SATA is not for the desktop only. Check out some of the SAN
coming out from most vendors, EMC included. Those drives and connections
look a lot like
that has
to go to disk for DIT often and that disk is a mirror.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:43 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:13:22 -0500
~
I don't have a problem with SATA (an upgrade from PATA) if used as
designed.
It's designed for desktop storage. Not that it can't be adjusted to
server/enterprise
The defaults will be more than adequate for a domain of the size you
are discussing.
Personally, I don't tend to build servers today without at least 1GB
of RAM, and any modern CPU with 1GB RAM will easily handle the DC
needs for the that you're talking about.
Here are some other guidelines
Wow. A four-proc machine (933 MHZ?) for 150 users and Exchange? Wow.
My personal opinion:
When it comes to architecture, you have to decide between scale up or scale
out. In AD, scale out is often preferred because it does this well out of
the box and because you want a second copy of the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: 07 November 2005 15:13
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Bottom line, I would guess that two HP 360's (SCSI; I haven't
been made
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: 07 November 2005 15:13
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Bottom line, I would guess that two HP 360's (SCSI; I haven't
been made comfortable with SATA reliability yet) or 140's
with 1GB
several of them (and rack-mounted too).
-- nme
-Original Message-
From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:13 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Stupid blonde alert
I
@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:13:19 -0800
Stupid blonde alert
I personally have SATA experience in the tower/desktop world but none in
the rack units. Are the physical connections any stronger in the rack
: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:13 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Stupid blonde alert
I personally have SATA experience in the tower/desktop world but none in
the rack units. Are the physical connections any stronger in the rack
world?
I like SCSI
/2005 17:22
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Ok, Sue, you know that when you leave a dangling diss like that someone is
going to ask you to support it ;-)
Beyond the connectors coming undone (something I have not experienced with
Dell desktop SATA), do
]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:13:19 -0800
Stupid blonde alert
I personally have SATA experience in the tower/desktop world but none in
the rack units. Are the physical connections
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:36:10 -
I've deployed SATA for storage of large files in Apple XRaid units in a
Raid 5+1 config, and so far so good. Ask me in 3 years if I'm still just as
happy ;-) but it was the only way to give the user
user.
Which is how it should be after all, and it doesn't do the old resume any harm
to have this all on there!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Al Mulnick
Sent: Mon 07/11/2005 18:53
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org,ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:07:28 -
Nope, DASD to a Apple G5 Xserve for a very small amount of Apple clients
(10) with very high storage
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Al Mulnick
Sent: Mon 07/11/2005 20:41
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Interesting. If that solution becomes a problem, have a look at
http://www.centrify.com and see if you can
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 3:42 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hardware Suggestions
Interesting. If that solution becomes a problem, have a look at
http://www.centrify.com and see if you can change some
29 matches
Mail list logo
