RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

is you DC a GC?  Exchange needs a GC on the same LAN. -Original Message-From: John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:58 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000I am in the process of setting up Exchange

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

Title: Message John,   Is this a single domain of a sub of a root domain? What kind of errors did you got? We need some more info to be able to help you out. I have not seen this error before.   Fred     -Original Message-From: John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

Title: Message what errors in the eventlog?     -Original Message-From: Van Donk, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:32 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 John,   Is this a single domain of a sub of

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

: 2835 KEMET Way  Simpsonville, SC 29681 USA ] "Craig Cerino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/21/2003 11:27 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 200

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

First of all - out of personal preference - -I would NOT put Exch on a DC in AD. Just my preference - but I wouldn't do it. Too much going on --- on both the DC and on the mail server -Original Message- From: John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

I have seen something similar to this before.  I had installed Exchange2k and rebooted the server.  The services would fail to start and I could not start them manually.  I ended up re-installing everything on the box and tried rebooting again, same thing happened.  I reinstalled a third ti

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 I have seen something similar to this before.  I had installed Exchange2k and rebooted the server.  The services would fail to start and I could not start them manually.  I ended up re-installing everything on the box and tried rebooting again, same thing

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 First of all - out of personal preference - -I would NOT put Exch on a DC in AD. Just my preference - but I wouldn't do it. Too much going on --- on both the DC and on the mail server -Ori

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 I have seen something similar to this before.  I had installed Exchange2k and rebooted the server.  The services would fail to start and I could not start them manually.  I ended up re-installing everything on the box and

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000   I thought Exchange 2k had to be a installed on a domain controller?  Do you have Anti-Virus software installed on this machine?   -Original Message- From

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

. -Original Message- From: Bryan Schlegel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 I thought Exchange 2k had to be a installed on a domain controller

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 I have seen something similar to this before.  I had installed Exchange2k and rebooted the server.  The services would fail to start and I could not start them manually.  I ended up re-installing everything on the box and tried rebooting

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 1/21/2003 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 That statement is all relative to actual server load and site requi

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

Could be that the Exchange services are starting before the machine's DC/GC services are up and running? As mentioned, Exchange won't start if it can't find a GC server. Is there another DC/GC on the network? Is DNS working ok? Can you start the services manually after boot? If you can then th

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

MessageBryan Schlegel writes: >I thought Exchange 2k had to be a installed on a domain controller? Nope. All the best, A -Original Message- From: Travis Riddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

[ Mailing: 2835 KEMET Way  Simpsonville, SC 29681 USA ] "Travis Riddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/21/2003 12:27 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Subject RE: [ActiveD

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000

D] To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 I have seen something similar to this before.  I had installed Exchange2k and rebooted the server.  The services would fail to start and I could not start them manually.  I ended up re

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing

It's a good feature - but everyone may not take advantage of it. I sent around an email with voting buttons to my company before turning it on or not turning it on. Asked them if they do full searches - partial word searches - full text searches or the 4th button was - - You can search for stuff i

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing

: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing It's a good feature - but everyone may not take advantage of it. I sent around an email with voting buttons to my company before turning it on or not turning it on. Asked them if they do full searches - partial word searches - full text searches or the 4th butto

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing

#x27;s out there in case this STB on you. -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:09 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing We currently have a slight demand for it and want

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing

Sorry long day. "STB"??? -Original Message- From: Craig Cerino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing Here's what I would look at - If you have a

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing

SHITE the Bed -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:01 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing Sorry long day. "STB"??? -Original Message-

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing

y, January 17, 2003 3:01 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 Indexing > > > Sorry long day. "STB"??? > > -Original Message- > From: Craig Cerino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Fr

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 upgrade woes

LOL. Been a while for PHP, but I'd be happy to have a look off-list. However, I did note two things: 1) Are you really sending a "Sorry, email's not working" through email? :) 2) You have a relay restriction that could be on the connector if you have one. You can set the relay restriction to all

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 upgrade woes

> > Let's reset: If I understand correctly, when you set the app > to send email, you get the following ONLY in the log: > 2004-06-07 18:12:32 %IP-ADDRESS-OF-WEB-SERVER% localhost.localdomain > SMTPSVC1 HELO 250 > 2004-06-07 18:12:32 %IP-ADDRESS-OF-WEB-SERVER% localhost.localdomain > SMTPSVC1 QUI

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 upgrade woes

EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 upgrade woes > > Let's reset: If I understand correctly, when you set the app to send > email, you get the following ONLY in the log: > 2004-06-07 18:12:32 %IP-ADDRESS-OF-WEB-SERVER% localhost.localdomain > SMTPSVC1 HE

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

Title: OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering We are very happy with ModusGate by Vircom (www.vircom.com). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burkes, Jeremy [Contractor]Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:50 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 S

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 7:00 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering We are very happy with ModusGate by Vircom (www.vircom.com). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burkes, Jeremy [Contra

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fuller, Stuart Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:38 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering   We are fairly happy with the Espion Interceptor anti-spam appliance and have discussed it previously o

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

Title: OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering I'm using MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info/) running on FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org/) You need a bit of Unix experience to set it up (but not too much) and it's working very well for us. A (sort of) diary of how I did it is at http://techinf

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

f Of Steve RochfordSent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:00 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering I'm using MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info/) running on FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org/) You need a bit of Unix experience to set it up (but not too

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

www.readymaids.com - we know ITwww.akomolafe.comDo you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?  -anon From: Mulnick, AlSent: Fri 7/16/2004 9:03 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering If you're going to go

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

Steve Rochford Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering I'm using MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info/) running on FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org/) You need a bit of Unix experience to set it up (but not too much) a

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

Title: OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering Steve said: >>>But, it really does not compete with Mailfrontier’s gateway.    Then I said: Steve,   is there anything specifically that makes you think Mailfrontier is superior to Sybari's? I am really interested because I'd hate to play second fiddle to

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering If you're going to go that route, you may also want to check out spamassin as a possible product. You'd want something that handles anti-virus to compliment the product.   al From: [EMAI

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deji Akomolafe Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering   Steve said: >>>But, it really does not compete with Mailfrontier’s gateway.    Th

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

rectory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steve Shaff Sent: Fri 7/16/2004 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering

ses (and I just drop these so I don't know if there are false positives but I tend to trust the virus scanner!)   Steve From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2004 17:04To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 SPAM Filtering If you'

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 to 2003 - upgrade by running inparallel.

Thanks Deji, Regards, Mark Parris Base IT Ltd Active Directory Consultancy Tel +44(0)7801 690596 -Original Message- From: "Akomolafe, Deji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:32:26 To: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 to 2003 - upgrade by runn

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 to 2003 - upgrade by running in parallel.

Getting the new Exchange server in there and moving mailboxes, PFs, RG master role, etc, is fairly easy. The main work is involved in getting the old server out of the mix. This (http://support.microsoft.com/?id=822931) should help somewhat. Sincerely, _

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 to 2003 - upgrade by running in parallel.

and don't forget: * MS-KBQ555262_Common Mistakes When Upgrading Exchange 5.5-2000 To a Exchange 2003 (http://support.microsoft.com/?id =555262) * MS-KBQ822942_Considerations When You Upgrade to Exchange Server 2003 (http://support.microsoft.com/?id

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 to 2003 - upgrade by running in parallel.

Bedankt voor de moeite. Regards, Mark Parris Base IT Ltd Active Directory Consultancy Tel +44(0)7801 690596 -Original Message- From: "Almeida Pinto, Jorge de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:07:39 To: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2000 to 2