Nah, Windows Server 2003 is. :oP
Heh.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
Sure but it's still the best version of W2K s
Good article, thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
I'd read this-
http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/39584/39584
yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SP4
Is this W2K sp4 you mean?
ddh
> So I guess it is safe to say that SP4 should be safe
Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
07/14/2004 03:55
In my W2K domain the only SP4 problems were related to nested security
groups and delegated permission's that were erased when I applied it on the
DC's. See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;817433 for
more info on that. To fix the problem I re-applied the delegated
permission
Sure but it's still the best version of W2K so far.
ddh
> I'd read this-
>
>
http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/39584/39584.
html
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Salandra, Justin A.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Is this W2K sp4 you mean?
ddh
> So I guess it is safe to say that SP4 should be safe
to deploy since not
> to many people have posted problems with the SP here
on the list and I
> have not seen too many things written about problems
arising from it.?
>
> Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
> Senior Netw
I'd read this-
http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/39584/39584.html
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] SP4
So I guess it is safe to say that SP4 should be safe t
?
Thanks again for the information. You
have saved us a huge amount of grief.
-Stuart Fuller
State of Montana
From: Puckett, Richard
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:48
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4 or not SP4? (hotfixes 824226
Stuart,
We originally installed SP4 near the
beginning of August on all of our production Domain Controllers after testing it
in our (mirror of production) lab. Within two production workdays we began
to see the same issues Vladimir mentioned in his BUGTRAQ e-mail and we opened a
case wit
:33 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
:) Sorry...I only highlighted the words because
that's the statement from MS, and to thumbtack the issue. It caught my eye
only after your post, but I was responding to the general
thread.
I've seen this issue float
Jon, if you wouldn't mind, send your TAM's
name offline.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/USSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:33
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4 question
I agree completely. It is funny
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question
John,
Show him the statement from TruSecure.
Microsoft is not going to repond to it, as they denied that it was
a problem from day one. Russ so much as sadmits this and the problem
is now histo
sday, August 27, 2003 10:20 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
Rod,
With all due respect, did I somehow indicate
otherwise? If I miscommunicated the message, I'd appreciate guidance
on how to better answer a question of this type.
-rtk
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
9:10 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
SP4 DOES NOT reintroduce the
vulnerability.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
KingslanSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:02 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
P - Active
DirectoryAssociate ExpertExpert Zone -
www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/USSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:00
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4 question
SP4 was release
which one came out first
chronologically?
From: Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:03
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
I have heard mixed opinions on
whether or not installing Win2k SP4 breaks the MS03-026 patch.
pting
:)
- Original Message -
From:
Joe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 10:15
AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 and
DC's
Actually if the delegation is to the protected groups, reapplying the
delegation won't do anything for
Title: Message
Actually if the delegation is to the protected groups, reapplying the
delegation won't do anything for you because it will be wiped again. Basically
the functional reach of adminsdholder has been extended to more groups. What
specifically are you trying to delegate and maybe we
Title: Message
indeed! lmao
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:56 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
LOL! Nice to be in such GREAT company!
:)
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCTMicrosoft MVP - Active
DirectoryAssociate
/VSIOSent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:54 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
Man, I
must be havin a ball.
John A. Bjelke
Unisys 505.853.6774
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Many of life's failures are people who did not
realize ho
Title: Message
he he
From: Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003
11:54 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] SP4
Man, I
must be havin a ball.
John A. Bjelke
Unisys 505.853.6774
-Thomas Edison
-Original Message-From: Hutchins, Mike
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:35
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] SP4
its mucho funno to be wrong occasionally..
;->
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Title: Message
its mucho funno to be wrong occasionally..
;->
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:08 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
Eh, no big deal. Look how many times I'm wrong around
here. Welcome to
ECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins,
MikeSent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:56 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
And I hate to admit being wrong, but you are right.
:-)
When we first patched all our machines, it was only
supported on SP3. However, as you stated, it has been regre
- Original Message -
From:
jalen richard
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:02
PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
Windows 2000 upgrades to SP4 undo the
MS03-026 patch. Take Windows 2000 machines with Service Pack 3, patch them
with MS03-026,
we are sp3 and higher anyways.
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:44 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
Mike,
I hate to disagree, but the minimum requirement for
MS03-026 DCOm Vuln patch is Windows 2000 SP2.
Rick Kingslan
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
>From another list:
Original Message -
From: "Jim Knouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thur
Title: Message
Which
latest 'virus'?
Considered a vulnerability assessment tool?
http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Tools/RPCDCOM.html
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Don Murawski (Lenox)Sent: Thursday, August 21,
2003 7
Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
Despite what the FAQ says, I've seen some win2k pro workstations where
the patch would NOT install
owsxp/expertzone
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jalen
richardSent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:02 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
Windows 2000 upgrades to SP4 undo the MS03-026
patch. Take Windows 2000 machines with Service Pack 3, patch
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins,
MikeSent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:37 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
sp3
From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003
8:34 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] SP4
The
en Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:26 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
Despite what the FAQ says, I've seen some win2k pro workstations where the patch would NOT install on SP2. Upgrading to SP3 allowed the patch to be applied. My guess
.
-Original Message-From: Ken Cornetet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003
11:26 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] SP4
Despite what
the FAQ says, I've seen some win2k pro workstations where the patch would NOT
install o
AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4
sp3
From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003
8:34 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] SP4
The
patch to stop the MSBlast virus only requires SP2 be installed
Since our internal standard is
SP3, we didn't spend anytime investigating - we just installed
SP3.
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003
10:11 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[ActiveDir] SP4
Is the patch su
Service Pack 2
if a problem results from installation of the patch. "
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url="">
- Original Message -
From:
Hutchins, Mike
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:36
AM
Subject: R
Title: Message
sp3
From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003
8:34 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] SP4
The
patch to stop the MSBlast virus only requires SP2 be installed on th
Title: Message
The
patch to stop the MSBlast virus only requires SP2 be installed on the
machine.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Don Murawski
We run application center and SP4 seems to corrupt MSSQL$MSAC. To correct it is easy
enough, you uninstall MSDE through app center install and then re-install and re-apply
MSDE SP2.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/07/03 03:40PM >>>
Anyone installed SP4 yet on their DC's?
If so, have you had any issues?
Title: Message
Lab testing at present is proceeding slowly, but no issues
as of yet.
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCTMicrosoft MVP - Active
DirectoryAssociate ExpertExpert Zone -
www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Mu
Title: Message
yes i have, no i have not.
- Original Message -
From:
Don Murawski (Lenox)
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:40
PM
Subject: [ActiveDir] SP4
Anyone installed SP4 yet
on their DC's?
If so, have you had any
issues?
42 matches
Mail list logo
