rom:* Nate Burke
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:09 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>
> I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic
> takeaway was 'We can do this cool thing, but it really doesn&#
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Jaime Solorza"
>> To: "Animal Farm"
>> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>>
>>
>> So how does the connector disti
No, the only benefit is rejection of reflected signals.
From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:09 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic
takeaway was 'We can do this
com
Sent: 11/22/2016 6:09:37 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic
takeaway was 'We can do this cool thing, but it really doesn't gain you
anything' It specifically says there is no net S
n antennas gains you.
>>>
>>> On 11/22/2016 4:26 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Supposedly it makes up for the loss by using the desired signal
>>>> component from both antennas.
>>>> I remember reading the original white p
el...@gmail.com>>
To: "Animal Farm" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and
relay information to chip set to "phase differently"?
olorza"
> To: "Animal Farm"
> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>
>
> So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay
> information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these
&
as are passive with no smarts.
>
> On Nov 22, 2016 3:42 PM, "George Skorup" wrote:
>
> Phase. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the
> 3.65.
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>
>> I think so...
>>
>>
SM's, so
>> they are/were confident enough in this to make it the "default" setup.
>>
>> It's a feature of their 802.11n chipset, so the computation is done
>> in hardware.
>>
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Nate
Burke Sent: Tuesday,
November 22, 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna
options
So if you were to use like a v/h UBNT antenna instead of the
Dual Slant antenna, They both should work? Wondering wha
e. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the
3.65.
On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I think so...
-Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November
22, 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4
antenna options
So if
uot;Animal Farm"
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay
information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these
antennas are passive with no smarts.
On Nov 22
does it too. At least the 3.65.
On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
> I think so...
>
> -Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22,
> 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna
> options
> So if you were to use like a
Phase. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the 3.65.
On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I think so...
-Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November
22, 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4
antenna options
I think so...
-Original Message-
From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So if you were to use like a v/h UBNT antenna instead of the Dual Slant
antenna, They both should work? Wondering what the 3x
from both antennas.
I remember reading the original white paper, and I remember thinking I
understood it for about 5 minutes or so.
-Original Message- From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So you have a
t;
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Nate Burke"
>> To: "Animal Farm"
>> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
>> Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>>
>> I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So you have a Dual slant AP and a V/H SM? Isn't that just losing signal
for no reason?
On 11/22/2016 4:21 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
They've apparently got some electronic magic that can take the received
signal on V/H and calc
feature of their 802.11n chipset, so the computation is done in
hardware.
-- Original Message --
From: "Nate Burke"
To: "Animal Farm"
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it li
;Animal Farm"
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as
being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200 2.4
radios are also Dual Slant to talk to this antenna? I di
I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as
being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200 2.4
radios are also Dual Slant to talk to this antenna? I didn't find
anything on the Force200 spec sheet talking about slant. If you use a
V/H Antenna as
21 matches
Mail list logo
