Ronald: I didn't have to choose 'Display images' to see your attached
picture again. What are you doing? It's fun, but scary.
On 1/9/09, Ronald C. Blue ronb...@u2ai.us wrote:
But how can it dequark the tachyon antimatter containment field?
Richard Loosemore
A model that can answer all
But how can it dequark the tachyon antimatter containment field?
Richard,
You missed Mike Tintner's explanation . . . .
You're not thinking your argument through. Look carefully at my
spontaneous
COW - DOG - TAIL - CURRENT CRISIS - LOCAL VS GLOBAL
THINKING - WHAT A NICE DAY - MUST GET
Ronald C. Blue wrote:
[snip] [snip] ... chaos stimulation because ... correlational
wavelet opponent processing machine ... globally entangled ...
Paul rf trap ... parallel modulating string pulses ... a relative
zero energy value or opponent process ... phase locked ...
parallel opponent
IMatt,
I mainly want to lay down a marker here for a future discussion.
What you have done is what all AGI-ers/AI-ers do. Faced with the problem of
domain-switching - (I pointed out that the human brain and human thought are *
freely domain-switching*), - you have simply ignored it - and, I
Mike, after a sequence of free associations, you drift from the original
domain. How is that incompatible with the model I described? I use A, B, C, as
variables to represent arbitrary thoughts.
-- Matt Mahoney, matmaho...@yahoo.com
--- On Fri, 1/9/09, Mike Tintner tint...@blueyonder.co.uk
--- On Thu, 1/8/09, Vladimir Nesov robot...@gmail.com wrote:
I claim that K(P) K(Q) because any description of P must include
a description of Q plus a description of what P does for at least one other
input.
Even if you somehow must represent P as concatenation of Q and
something
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Matt Mahoney matmaho...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, it is true that you can find |P| |Q| for some cases of P nontrivially
simulating Q depending on the choice of language. However, it is not true on
average. It is also not possible for P to nontrivially simulate
You need to name those parameters in a sentence only because it's
linear, in a graph they can correspond to unnamed nodes. Abstractions
can have structure, and their applicability can depend on how their
structure matches the current scene. If you retain in a scene graph
only relations you
Harry Chesley wrote:
I'm trying to get an idea of how our minds handle the tension between
identity and abstraction, and it occurs to me that there have probably
been human subject experiments that would shed light on this. Does
anyone know of any?
The basic issue: On the one hand, we
On 1/9/2009 9:28 AM, Vladimir Nesov wrote:
You need to name those parameters in a sentence only because it's
linear, in a graph they can correspond to unnamed nodes. Abstractions
can have structure, and their applicability can depend on how their
structure matches the current scene. If you
Richard,
You missed Mike Tintner's explanation . . . .
Mark,
Right
So you think maybe what we've got here is a radical influx of globally
entangled free-association bosons?
Richard,
Q.E.D. Well done.
Now tell me how you connected my ridiculous [or however else you might
On 1/9/2009 9:45 AM, Richard Loosemore wrote:
There are certainly experiments that might address some of your
concerns, but I am afraid you will have to acquire a general
knowledge of what is known, first, to be able to make sense of what
they might tell you. There is nothing that can be
In outlook express change format to html and insert picture. Generally this
safer than an attachment.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Burton brila...@gmail.com
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: 1/9/09 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
Ronald: I didn't have to choose 'Display
Harry Chesley wrote:
On 1/9/2009 9:45 AM, Richard Loosemore wrote:
There are certainly experiments that might address some of your
concerns, but I am afraid you will have to acquire a general
knowledge of what is known, first, to be able to make sense of what
they might tell you. There is
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Harry Chesley ches...@acm.org wrote:
On 1/9/2009 9:28 AM, Vladimir Nesov wrote:
You need to name those parameters in a sentence only because it's
linear, in a graph they can correspond to unnamed nodes. Abstractions
can have structure, and their
Mike,
What is the evidence, if any, that it would be difficult for a sophisticated
Novamente-like AGI to switch domains?
In fact, much of valuable AGI thinking would involve patterns and mental
behaviors that extended across different domains. Human natural language
understanding is believed
Harry,
Obviously this is an issue any intelligent AGI has to deal with. However,
at high level I don't think it is that mysterious, although, like most
things in AGI, in detail it would have quite a few wrinkles, most of which a
properly designed AGI should learn to deal with automatically.
object perception
Identity is the abstraction that you are focusing your attention on.
Habituation is stimulus specific and does not reduce the responsiveness for
stimuli you are currently ignoring. As such after habituation or eye movement
new abstract interpretations to NAME an identity
Hi all,
I intend to submit the following paper to JAGI shortly, but I figured
I'd run it past you folks on this list first, and incorporate any
useful feedback into the draft I submit
This is an attempt to articulate a virtual world infrastructure that
will be adequate for the development of
Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.Hi Ed, (and Matt too)
If you'll be patient with me, I'm going to work longer and truly formalise my
reply here - distinguishing among other things between Rational Logic (as we
know it) and a new Creative Logic, (which computers are currently, though not
Goertzel this is an interesting line of investigation. What about in
world sound perception?
On 1/9/09, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
Hi all,
I intend to submit the following paper to JAGI shortly, but I figured
I'd run it past you folks on this list first, and incorporate any
useful
It's actually mentioned there, though not emphasized... there's a
section on senses...
ben g
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Eric Burton brila...@gmail.com wrote:
Goertzel this is an interesting line of investigation. What about in
world sound perception?
On 1/9/09, Ben Goertzel
Steve,
It seems that you misunderstood several of the things that I said.
Concerning grammar theory, I am only invoking the basics of the field,
so the wikipedia article should be enough if you want to know what I
meant by regular grammar and about them being only the first level
of the
Not really related to your topic, but it sort of isMany years ago
Disney made a movie about an alien cat that was telepathic and came to earth
in a Flying saucer.
A stupid movie because cats can not develop the technology to do this.
Recently I realized that while cat can not do this a
24 matches
Mail list logo
