Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Eric Burton
I've actually got a pretty solid grasp on the underpinnings of this stuff, Terren. I was agreeing with you: memory formation via gene modification may be only endemic. Probably not all or the reproductive cells have their nuclei written to by every, or any, given stimulus. Yet, there are arguments

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Matt Mahoney
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton wrote: > I don't know how you derived the value 10^4, Matt, but that seems > reasonable to me. Terren, let me go back to the article and try to > understand what exactly it says is happening. Certainly that's my > editorial's crux A simulation of a neural networ

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Terren Suydam
nothing to help your cause, either... and that's coming from someone who believes that psychedelics can be valuable, if used properly. Terren --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton wrote: > From: Eric Burton > Subject: Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?) > To: agi@v2.listbox.com >

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Eric Burton
Ok. >"We think we're seeing short-term memories forming in the hippocampus and >slowly turning into >long-term memories in the cortex," says Miller, who presented the results last >week at the Society >for Neuroscience meeting in Washington DC. It certainly sounds like the genetic changes are l

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Eric Burton
I don't know how you derived the value 10^4, Matt, but that seems reasonable to me. Terren, let me go back to the article and try to understand what exactly it says is happening. Certainly that's my editorial's crux On 12/11/08, Matt Mahoney wrote: > --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton wrote: > >>

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Matt Mahoney
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton wrote: > I don't think that each inheritor receives a full set of the > original's memories. But there may have *evolved* in spite of the > obvious barriers, a means of transferring primary or significant > experience from one organism to another in genetic form.

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Terren Suydam
of intelligence. So talk specifically and technically about *mechanisms* (even if extremely unlikely) and you're not wasting anyone's time. Terren --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton wrote: > From: Eric Burton > Subject: Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?) > To: agi@v2.listbox.com

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Eric Burton
I don't think that each inheritor receives a full set of the original's memories. But there may have *evolved* in spite of the obvious barriers, a means of transferring primary or significant experience from one organism to another in genetic form... we can imagine such a thing given this news! On

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Matt Mahoney
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton wrote: > You can see though how genetic memory encoding opens the door to > acquired phenotype changes over an organism's life, though, and those > could become communicable. I think Lysenko was onto something like > this. Let us hope all those Soviet farmers wou

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Eric Burton
You can see though how genetic memory encoding opens the door to acquired phenotype changes over an organism's life, though, and those could become communicable. I think Lysenko was onto something like this. Let us hope all those Soviet farmers wouldn't have just starved! ;3 On 12/11/08, Matt Maho

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Matt Mahoney
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton wrote: > It's all a big vindication for genetic memory, that's for certain. I > was comfortable with the notion of certain templates, archetypes, > being handed down as aspects of brain design via natural selection, > but this really clears the way for organisms'

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Richard Loosemore
by Oswald Steward or 2) activity causes a specific synapse to be 'tagged' so that newly synthesized proteins in the cell body are targeted specifically to the tagged synapses." Terren --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Ed Porter wrote: From: Ed Porter Subject: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?) To:

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Eric Burton
ynapses (see papers published by Oswald > Steward or 2) activity causes a specific synapse to be 'tagged' so that > newly synthesized proteins in the cell body are targeted specifically to the > tagged synapses." > > Terren > > --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Ed

Re: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Terren Suydam
Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Ed Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?) To: agi@v2.listbox.com Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008, 10:32 AM I To save you the trouble the most relevant language from the below cited article is     “Whi

FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Porter
the memory trace is still there, but the animal cannot retrieve it due to damage to neural circuits," she adds. " -Original Message- From: Ed Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:28 AM To: 'agi@v2.listbox.com' Subject: FW: [agi] L

FW: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Porter
An article related to how changes in the epigenonme could affect learning and memory (the subject which started this thread a week ago) http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/21801/ --- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archiv