Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract (Designating reportor)

This text may also be worthy of a CFJ. I give 48 hours notice to amend the last paragraph of "Reporting Agency" to read in its entirety as follows: {{{ The Agent of this contract, while the proprietor is the Reportor, may announce that they are "acting as the Agent of the Reportor" and publish a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract (Designating reportor)

PF On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:21 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I become a party to the below contract > (I may have a CFJ regarding it at some point, because it's me, of course). > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Josh T wrote: >> Since I'll be busy

BUS: Contract (Designating reportor)

Since I'll be busy and apparently was remiss in doing things in the upstanding Agoran fashion, on suggestion I am going to make the following contract, titled "Reporting Agency", and paying the shiny to do so: {{{ The player 天火狐 is the proprietor of the Reporting Agency. This contract recognizes

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7965-7972

I vote: On 11/12/2017 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee --- 7965* Trigon 3.0 One pronoun fix Trigon 1 AP FOR 7966*

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7965-7972

Indeed I can, and I do so. -Aris On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > I do not think you can withdraw CoEs, but Aris can deny it. > > > On 11/12/2017 6:41 PM, ATMunn wrote: >> >> You're absolutely right, I forgot about that and was too lazy to check.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7965-7972

I do not think you can withdraw CoEs, but Aris can deny it. On 11/12/2017 6:41 PM, ATMunn wrote: You're absolutely right, I forgot about that and was too lazy to check. If possible, I withdraw my CoE. (I don't think you can actually do that, but again, too lazy to check. If you can't, then I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7965-7972

You're absolutely right, I forgot about that and was too lazy to check. If possible, I withdraw my CoE. (I don't think you can actually do that, but again, too lazy to check. If you can't, then I suggest denying the CoE.) On 11/12/2017 8:23 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Wasn't that Proposal 7962

BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7957-7961

I change my mood to melancholy because of the adoption of 7961. On 11/12/2017 3:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7957-7961 below. [This notice resolves the

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

I withdraw my support in light of zombies passing. I'll wait to object to see if anyone finds any more problems with the resolution. -Aris On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I support all of these. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

I object to all of these (and the one for Murphy) bc zombies. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > As do I. > > On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 at 19:38 ATMunn wrote: > >> I support all of these. >> >> On 11/12/2017 6:02 PM, Telnaior wrote: >> >

BUS: CFJ 3593 judged TRUE

Rule 1650 states: "A Silly Proposal is a Proposal whose sole contents are one of the following: i) A limerick. ii) A rhymed poem no longer than fourteen lines. (No free verse!) iii) A joke of no more than a hundred words. iv) A truly hideous pun."

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7965-7972

CoE: I might be missing something, but I'm pretty sure I submitted the fix for my Medals of Honour proposal. I don't see that here. On 11/12/2017 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

As do I. On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 at 19:38 ATMunn wrote: > I support all of these. > > On 11/12/2017 6:02 PM, Telnaior wrote: > > Well... that can't possibly end poorly? > > > > I intend to deregister Ienpw III with 3 Agoran Support. > > I intend to deregister Bayushi with 3

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

I support all of these. On 11/12/2017 6:02 PM, Telnaior wrote: Well... that can't possibly end poorly? I intend to deregister Ienpw III with 3 Agoran Support. I intend to deregister Bayushi with 3 Agoran Support. I intend to deregister ProofTechnique with 3 Agoran Support. I award myself a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Medal of Honor Decision initiation

Oh yeah, I was wondering if it'd mean anything but we may as well find out: I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour. Does that make me a valid vote (assuming my judgement falls in a way that makes this declaration possible)? On 2017-11-13 10:45, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 13 Nov

BUS: zombie-related CFJ

I AP-CFJ on: It is POSSIBLE for an Agent to act on behalf of a Principal to send a message to a public forum for the purposes of preventing the Principal's deregistration as per R869. (Arguments to follow, trying to get this in before the end of the week).

BUS: Stamp + Rewards

I buy a stamp for 6 shinies. I claim a reward of 5 shinies for my Promotor report. I claim a reward of 5 shinies for my Regkeepor report. -Aris

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sillyness

I AP-CFJ "If adopted, the proposal 'Sky Pillars' would create a new rule". I bar V.J. Rada. Arguments: The word "enacted" is defined by the rules, and it means only the creation of a rule. Also, "the name being redacted" suggests a blank title, which also implies that a rule is being created to

BUS: Zombies

I make Agora the master of Murphy, babalien and IenpwIII (I think I missed one, and I'm not sure whether or not Quazie has posted in 60 days either). -- >From V.J. Rada

BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Medal of Honor Decision initiation

Obviously, I vote for G. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I initiate an Agoran decision on who is > to be awarded a Medal of Honour. > > For this decision, the > valid votes are

BUS: Sillyness

I submit the following proposal as my silly proposal. I appoint Trigon to be next week's silly person. If the appointment of Trigon failed, I appoint ATMunn to be next week's silly person. -Aris --- Title: Sky Pillars AI: 1.0 Author: Aris It's hereby enacted (The name being redacted): If a

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

I support all of these. -Aris On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Telnaior wrote: > Well... that can't possibly end poorly? > > I intend to deregister Ienpw III with 3 Agoran Support. > I intend to deregister Bayushi with 3 Agoran Support. > I intend to deregister ProofTechnique

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > I support, and intend to deregister Murphy w/ 3 agoran Consent I object to intent for Murphy.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

I support, and intend to deregister Murphy w/ 3 agoran Consent On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I support these (but noting V.J. Rada's note about failed votes, > the story might not be finished here...) > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Telnaior wrote:

Re: BUS: Silly Parties

If "Backed Out the Door" is not pending, I pend it for 1 AP. -Aris On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:52 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > PF > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> I call an AP CFJ w/ the statement: "Alexis's proposal 'Backed Out the >>

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

I don't think so? (also, sent to me not a mailing list) JATC was ruled by CFJ to make nothing illegal, and then repealed before the end of the voting period I think? So, it's pretty unambiguous that it illegalizes nothing. This matters because if my votes counted, Boo! passed. Therefore, I CoE:

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

I support these (but noting V.J. Rada's note about failed votes, the story might not be finished here...) On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Telnaior wrote: > Well... that can't possibly end poorly? > > I intend to deregister Ienpw III with 3 Agoran Support. > I intend to deregister Bayushi with 3 Agoran

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7948-7953

Well... that can't possibly end poorly? I intend to deregister Ienpw III with 3 Agoran Support. I intend to deregister Bayushi with 3 Agoran Support. I intend to deregister ProofTechnique with 3 Agoran Support. I award myself a Red Ribbon for Proposal 7959. On 2017-11-13 09:35, Kerim Aydin

BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 12 Nov 2017] I claim a 5-shiny reward for this report. -G.

BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Honour Roll

On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > The Honour Roll > [Herald's Weekly Report] > I claim a 5-shiny reward for this report. -G.

Re: BUS: enough foolishness!

I AP-pend the below proposal. -G. On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I submit the following the proposal, Silly Tweaks, AI-2: > > -- > > Amend Rule 1650 (Silliness) by replacing: > ii) A rhymed poem no longer

BUS: weekly Honour

Notice of Honour -1 from 天火狐 for a low-effort newspaper report. +1 to omd for quick response to Distributor directives, in spite of being fairly silent otherwise.

BUS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Agora Sky News vol 7

I claim a reward of 5 shinies for the report. 天火狐 On 12 November 2017 at 11:29, Josh T wrote: > > > = Agora Sky News > === >

Re: BUS: Reward

I give the below proposal the title "Rewards Time Limit Fix", or, if it was not submitted because of the lack of a title, I submit it again with the aforementioned title. On 11/12/2017 2:51 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: Could you give it a title? -Aris On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, ATMunn