I'm bad at poems
Really I just do haikus
My vote is SUPPORT
On 11/6/2017 6:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
As Herald I did wait to see
How Silly we could truly be.
And now with a few proposals in queue,
We find that puns are easier to do.
Poems though - are hard to plan!
And harder to make sure they
I have no idea if this actually worked or not, since the rule is a bit broken.
We'll just... pretend it works...
On 11/6/2017 6:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour.
not resolve the Campaign
Proposal? Is there still not enough votes?
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:59 PM, ATMunn mailto:iamingodsa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yay, I can publish my ADoP report now!
On 11/6/2017 4:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I resolve the decision(s) to a
The following is a Notice of Honour:
I lose 1 karma for causing trouble to Agora by forgetting to state the
quorum on my Agoran Decision initiations.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus gains 1 karma for putting up with my
mistakes.
I pledge to either pend or withdraw the below proposal before the beginning of
the next Agoran week.
I submit the following proposal:
Title: "But I already live there!"
AI: 1
Amend rule 2474 "Green Cards" by replacing the text "the United States" with
"Brazil".
I claim an Orange ribbon for proposal 7943.
Actually, I change my vote on the Referee election to PRESENT. I'm not even
sure who I want to be Referee.
On 11/6/2017 9:31 AM, ATMunn wrote:
My vote for Referee will also change, and Telnaior has voted now.
Also, I was going to publish my ADoP report, but I already changed everything
with 1 shiny going to Agora and the other to PSS
I intend to levy a fine, with 2 support, on ATMunn. E was issued a blue card,
with 1 shiny going to Agora and the other to PSS
--
From V.J. Rada
essor, the
quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
also a valid vote, as are conditional votes).
ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee
---
7962* ATMunn
lan, Ienpw III, omd,
Bayushi, nichdel, Cuddlebeam, ATMunn, ProofTechnique, Trigon, Alexis,
and Telnaior.
Alexis, VJ Rada, PSS, o, G.
On 11/06/2017 06:38 AM, Madeline wrote:
Well the name and shame proposal passed, so calling out the people who
don't have a vote recorded is a good start!
On 2
I vote:
7948: FOR.
7949: AGAINST.
7950: FOR.
7951: FOR.
7952: FOR.
7953: FOR.
On 11/5/2017 9:53 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
You did not.
On 11/05/2017 09:48 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I have no idea if I voted on these or not.
On 11/5/2017 9:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Okay.
I deny all of PSS's CoEs.
On 11/5/2017 9:54 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
You do, but you should deny all of them.
On 11/05/2017 09:50 PM, ATMunn wrote:
Wait so... what's actually going on here? Do I need to respond to the
CoEs or what? I'm very confused
1 sh.
7932* ATMunn, [1]1.0 A Reward for Obedience v5ATMunn 1 AP
7933* Alexis 3.0 Ribbon Preservation Act Alexis 1 sh.
7934* 天火狐 1.0 Poetry Duel Challenge Writ 天火狐 OP [2]
7935* Trigon 3.0 Revision Limits v2 Trigon 1 AP
7936*
Oh, okay. I retract the most recent proposal entitled "Medals of Honour Fix"
On 11/5/2017 6:56 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
It went through [1]. I pay ATMunn 2 shinies, and apologize for the
error. You should probably retract your new one.
-Aris
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/agor
I also pend the below with shinies (I think I may have already used both of my
AP, but I'm not sure)
On 11/5/2017 6:40 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I just realized something...
On October 30, I made a proposal to fix my Medals of Honour proposal. I was
going to CoE this because it's not her
NOBODY GOT IT
So that's fun.
I submit the following proposal:
Title: "Medals of Honour Fix"
AI: 1
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s):
If there is a rule entitled "Medals of Honour", and it contains the phrase "In the 7 days of
an Agoran month", then amend that rule
Actually, you know what, several people have made a good point: It's useful
even without the Fearmongor.
I change my vote on proposal 7957 (for the last time) to AGAINST.
On 11/5/2017 5:05 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I change my vote on proposal 7957 to the following:
CONDITIONAL: If proposal 796
I change my vote on proposal 7957 to the following:
CONDITIONAL: If proposal 7961 has more FOR votes than AGAINST votes, then I
vote FOR, otherwise AGAINST.
On 11/5/2017 5:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
CONDITIONAL: If the proposal "Fear less" passes, then I vo
I change my emotion to Melancholy because of the troubles my Emotions rule have
caused for the Registrar.
Oops, didn't mean to send to a-b.
If, in the below message, I submitted a proposal, I retract it.
On 11/5/2017 12:24 PM, ATMunn wrote:
We're on the way to more drafts than Contracts!
Title: Auctions v3
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s): Aris, nichdel, G.
AI: 2
In this draft, numbers e
We're on the way to more drafts than Contracts!
Title: Auctions v3
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s): Aris, nichdel, G.
AI: 2
In this draft, numbers enclosed in square brackets (e.g. [1], [2], [3],
etc.) indicate footnotes which are written at the bottom. These will
not be in the final pro
statement: ATMunn bought a Stamp in the referenced
message (posted on or about 2 Nov 2017 14:34 Z).
This is CFJ 3590. I assign it to o.
I find this CFJ to be FALSE.
The test given in CFJ 3409 is clear. Given the below message:
From: ATMunn
Reply-To: agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org
To
lt;http://u.washington.edu> 25 Aug 17
Cuddle Beam cuddlebeam at gmail.com <http://gmail.com>
25 Aug 17
V.J. Rada vijarada at gmail.com <http://gmail.com>
05 Sep 17
ATMunn iamingod
Ah. I thought I recalled reading that in there somewhere.
On 11/4/2017 9:12 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
Read the rule on switches. It says the tracker of a switch must include it in
eir report, defaulting to weekly if not otherwise specified. That's rule 2162.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, A
0:27:05 Agora paid ATMunn 2 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:27:13 + Aris paid Agora 1 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 01:13:16 Agora paid Alexis 2 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:03:06 + Aris paid Agora 1 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:17:51 + Aris paid Agora 1 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:50:04 The Community Chest paid V.J Rada 23
Oh, thanks for reminding me to disallow this in my auctions proposal!
Quick side note: Should this be made ILLEGAL or IMPOSSIBLE?
On 11/3/2017 7:23 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
I bid 1011 shinies on the Estate Auction.
--
From V.J. Rada
Oops.
On 11/3/2017 5:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The below notice of honour failed because ATMunn did one earlier in the
week (from omd to Trigon). But the gain is deserved and I haven't done
one this week, so:
Notice of Honour:
Alexis gains 1 karma for putting the time into this t
counts for Alexis's Thesis:
A.N.
SUPPORT: PSS, CuddleBeam, Aris
OBJECT: ATMunn
M.N.
SUPPORT: ATMunn, CuddleBeam
OBJECT: PSS, Aris
M.N. would require 3 more supporters to reach the 2 Agoran Consent level.
Accordingly, with 2 Agoran Consent, I hereby award an Associate of Nomic
Degree to A
TTttCPF
(This Time to the Correct Public Forum)
On 11/2/2017 9:51 AM, ATMunn wrote:
I bid 30 shinies on this auction.
My blurb:
Erehwon is a humble village full of farmers and carpenters. Although
small, Erehwon is widely known in the surrounding areas for the
excellent products its people
I change my vote to a conditional:
If o posts a message to agora-discussion before the end of this election,
containing a reason why I should vote for em, then I vote {o}, otherwise
I vote {VJ Rada}.
On 11/1/2017 8:45 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
First I'd just like to say, I'm not dissing o in any way he
Let's test the limits of how far subject line actions can go...
Feel free to CFJ.
I vote {o, VJ Rada} and FOR the campaign proposal.
It kind of sucks being the ADoP right after the Election Campaigns
proposal passed. Then again, it's also kind of nice because I don't have
to count the votes. (even though I did count them)
On 11/1/2017 9:15 AM, ATMunn wrote:
On 10
I vote {o, VJ Rada} for Referee. [is this any different from just voting for o?]
On 10/31/2017 10:01 AM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Referee election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid
I support
On 10/30/2017 9:54 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Oct 30, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Alexis Hunt mailto:aler...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Consequently, I find that the correct way to interpret this contract is simply
that it does nothing. Accordingly, CFJ 3587 is FALSE and CFJ 3588 is TRUE.
I inten
On 10/30/2017 9:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
7932* ATMunn, [1]1.0 A Reward for Obedience v5ATMunn 1 AP
FOR. As noted elsewhere, the corrected distribution contains an essential word
missing from the previous distribution.
No, it's actually not, I don't think. At the
On 10/30/2017 8:54 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
I vote as follows:
7932* ATMunn, [1]1.0 A Reward for Obedience v5ATMunn 1 AP
AGAINST. “In the 7 days of an Agoran month” is nonsense. With the obvious fix,
I’d likely vote for it: it’s a neat mechanic and ties in nicely with others
rd for violating rule 2471
- time of last report -
Wed, 4 Oct 2017 01:44:46 o issued a Green Card for violating rule 2479
Thu, 5 Oct 2017 06:33:38 V.J Rada made a pledge
Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:43:15 ATMunn made a pledge
Sun, 8 Oct 2017 17:59:55 V.J Rada pointed a finger at Gaelan for viol
I claim a reward of 5 shinies for my recent ADoP report.
This is a Notice of Honour:
Trigon gains one karma for seeming to do really well so far at
publishing rulesets,
omd loses one karma because I can't think of anyone else to lose
karma and e is inactive.
On 10/30/2017 2:07 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
Is there any way I
I vote FOR.
On 10/30/2017 9:38 AM, ATMunn wrote:
Doing it correctly this time!
Note: If you've already voted, you'll have to vote again.
As the nomination period of the Surveyor election is over, and there
was only one candidate, o, the election is uncontested.
Since e did submit
I vote FOR o's campaign proposal and AGAINST VJ Rada's proposal.
(o's is the only one that works!)
I vote for o in the election.
On 10/30/2017 9:40 AM, ATMunn wrote:
Doing it correctly this time!
If you already voted on this, please vote again.
As per my duties as ADoP, I here
I vote {Alexis, PSS} (again)
On 10/30/2017 9:41 AM, ATMunn wrote:
Doing it correctly this time!
If you already voted, please vote again.
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Rulekeepor election.
For this decision, the vote collector is
I vote as follows:
7931 PRESENT
7932 FOR
7933 FOR
7934 FOR
7935 FOR
7936 FOR
7937 PRESENT
7938 FOR
7939 AGAINST
7940 FOR
7941 FOR
7942 AGAINST
7943 FOR
7944 FOR
7945 FOR
7946 AGAINST
7947 AGAINST
I do the same.
On 10/29/2017 9:57 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
I vote FOR.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:55 PM, ATMunn wrote:
As the nomination period of the Surveyor election is over, and there
was only one candidate, o, the election is uncontested.
Since e did submit a campaign proposal, I hereby
I meant CFJ, not CoE.
If in the below quoted message, I issued a Claim of Error, I retract it and
initiate a CFJ with AP with the same reason.
If I did not issue a CoE or initiate a CFJ, then I initiate a CFJ with AP with
the below reason.
On 10/28/2017 8:23 PM, ATMunn wrote:
AP CoE: In the
, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Reuben Staley mailto:reuben.sta...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I vote [Trigon, Alexis]
On 10/28/2017 8:42 AM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Rulekeepor election.
I also intend to wager the occult hand.
What could go wrong? :D
On 10/28/2017 10:48 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
I become a party and intend to wager the occult hand.
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, 09:58 Josh T, mailto:draconicdarkn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I amend the Order of the Occult Hand in the manner
I vote {Alexis, PSS}
On 10/28/2017 10:42 AM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the
winner of the Rulekeepor election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options are
the candidates, and the voting method is
Ok, I change my vote on proposal 7946 to AGAINST, I guess.
On 10/28/2017 10:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
7946* Telnaior 3.0 MASUAC [4] Telnaior1 AP
AGAINST
7947* V.J. Rada, [5] 3.0 MCVotA [6] V.
d fee
---
7931* G. 3.0 Registration fix finally G. 1 sh.
PRESENT
7932* ATMunn, [1]1.0 A Reward for Obedience v5ATMunn 1 AP
FOR
7933* Alexis 3.0 Ribbon Preservation Act Alexis 1 sh.
I don't really know which is appropriate.
This is already way beyond my level, and from skimming over it it seems fairly
deep.
I'm going to go ahead and object to the intent for A.N, and support the intent
for M.N.
I think e deserves it for this much work (but again, this is something new to
me
Seems cool. I become a party to the Order.
On 10/25/2017 11:45 PM, Josh T wrote:
I create the following contract, titled "Order of the Occult Hand", by paying
Agora 1 Shiny:
{{{
The player 天火狐 is the proprietor of the Order of the Occult Hand. The proprietor CAN make
amendments to this contrac
For fun, I create the below proposal:
Title: Way More Controversial Version of the Above
Author: ATMunn
Co-Author(s): Telnaior, V.J. Rada
Deregister all currently registered players.
On 10/25/2017 9:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
On the same note I create the below proposal and pend it with AP
Title
I claim a reward of 5 shinies for my recent ADoP report, and donate
2 of those shinies to the Community Chest.
Apparently I never successfully withdrew my pledge, but it is impossible for me
to break it, so I intend to withdraw my pledge without objection. (This means
that in 4 days, if there wer
CoE: The Rulekeepor election was initiated on 2017-10-23, not 2017-10-24.
On 10/24/2017 10:04 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I accept all of the CoE's and publish the following report. (The spacing is a
little weird on some of the columns, but I'm not going to fix it because I need
to
I support, why not.
On 10/25/2017 1:35 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Pursuant to rule 2493 (“Regulations”), I intend, without 2 objections or with
consent, to recommend the following regulation. This regulation is purely a
formality, as the values it sets are the default values for the relevant
sw
15 Oct 2017 19:50:05 Agora paid P.S.S.[1] 10 sh.
Sun, 15 Oct 2017 20:27:05 Agora paid ATMunn 2 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:27:13 Aris paid Agora 1 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 01:13:16 Agora paid Alexis 2 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:03:06 Aris paid Agora 1 sh.
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:17:51 Aris paid Agora 1 sh.
Mo
TTttPF
On 10/25/2017 9:03 AM, ATMunn wrote:
On 10/24/2017 10:25 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
I found a typo. I'm sure this isn't your fault Aris, but attn ATMunn
" In the 7 days of an Agoran month, any player CAN declare emself to be
eligible for a Medal of Honour by announcemen
It's alright. We forgive you.
By the way, is there a reason why you're initiating an election for
Notary? The Contracts proposal specifically makes you the Notary.
On 10/24/2017 3:08 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Hi folks, fellow Agorans, spectators, et al:
I’m tremendously sorry for my performan
I create the following proposal and pend it with a shiny:
Title: "Mini fixes"
Author: ATMunn
AI: 2
Co-Author(s):
Amend rule 2514, "Emotions", by replacing "registrar" with "Registrar"
Amend rule 1650, "Silliness", by replacing "Each Nomic Week" with "Each
Agoran week"
other shiny (bringing my total up to 2)
in an obvious bribe, again.
7924: FOR
7925: FOR
7926: AGAINST
7927: FOR
7928: FOR
7929: AGAINST
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> I CFJ on
>
> In a below quoted message of 19 October, ATMunn succeeded in chan
I CFJ with AP on the following statement:
Aris's intent to destroy the universe is valid.
Caller's arguments: The universe is too large for Aris to destroy.
[What a stupid thing for my first ever CFJ to be. I love it. I honestly
don't care how this is judged.]
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Ar
Speaking of...
If Telnaior's shiny balance is 0 as of the sending of this message, I
transfer 10 shinies to Telnaior.
I included the conditional in case Agora did have enough shinies for the
welcome package to succeed. I don't think it did, however.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:05
You'd think I would remember to post to the public forum by now. Apparently
not.
TTttPF.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:07 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:15 PM, ATMunn .
> wrote:
>
>> Alright. I think this looks pretty good. If nobody mentions anything else
&
Ugh. TTttPF.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:42 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I change my vote as follows:
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:30 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
>> Oops, I accidentally sent before I was finished. Here is the my full vote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017
oops, TTttPF
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Changes from last version:
> * Repealed victory elections
> * Clarified when certain things can happen (in kind of a clanky way to be
> honest)
> * Made all eligible players no longer eligible after the medal i
I retract the proposal "A Reward for Obedience".
I'm not going to propose a new one yet, it might take me a little bit to
make the changes I need to. I don't have the time to do that right now.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:09 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> [sorry for double post, Gm
I submit the following proposal and pend it with 1 shiny.
Title: "A Reward for Obedience v3"
Author: ATMunn
Co-Author(s): Aris, Alexis
AI: 1
Create a new power-1 rule titled "Medals of Honour"
{
Medals of Honour are a destructible fixed currency tracked by the
Herald.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Revised proposal pool (effective at the time of my last report):
>
> IDAuthor(s) AI Title
>
> ---
> pp1 o
Oops, I accidentally sent before I was finished. Here is the my full vote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:27 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Aris Merchant gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> q
I change my emotion to joyous because my first ever proposal in Agora
passed with only a few voting against.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 9:43 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV5lzRHrGeg
>
> I change my emotion to melancholy because the enabling proposal, which
> I voted against,
TTttPF
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:26 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Is this new or am I not aware of something?
>
> Well, either way, I guess I also claim a reward of two shinies for
> authoring and pending a passed proposal.
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
>
I just figured out what the purpose of stamps is. I hadn't realized it
before; I must have just not looked very closely at that section of the
rules.
I buy a stamp by transferring 1 shiny to Agora.
Hm, yeah, I knew that. I don't know why I thought it was 1.
I buy a stamp by transferring 2 shinies (not one, but two!) to Agora.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 11:30 ATMunn . wrote:
>
>> I just figured out what the purpose of st
e for [person1, person2,
person3, etc.]"?)
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> I retract my vote for ADoP and vote (ATMunn, V.J. Rada).
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
I vote REMAND.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I initiate an Agoran Decision to resolve the Moot on CFJ 3568.
> For this decision, the vote collector is the Arbitor and the
> valid options are AFFIRM, REMAND, and REMIT. Quorum is 5.
>
>
> A result o
TTttPF.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:51 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> My bad. Apparently this is actually possible as of very recently, so
> recently in fact that the rulekeepor has not updated the online ruleset
> yet. That makes this completely redundant.
> I retract the proposal "
eally want to take advantage of that)
I create the following proposal:
Name: Pledge Withdrawal
Author: ATMunn
AI: 1.7
Amend rule 2450 by adding the following text at the end:
{
If, at any time, a player owns a pledge which is impossible for em to
break, e CAN withdraw that pledge without objectio
ailor, unanimously! That is, with 5 votes
> -
> Alexis: Alexis
> Quazie: Endorse G unless that would lead to a vote for Quazie
> Resolved as: PRESENT
> Trigon: Alexis
> PSS: {Alexis, PSS}
> o: Alexis
> V.J. Rada: Alexis
> ATMunn: PRESENT
> G: PRESENT
>
pf
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:45 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I vote Alexis for ADoP and myself for PM.
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I vote VJ Rada for ADoP and [myself, G.,
e FOR.
> 7911* V.J. Rada 1.0 Infinite Money Fix V.J. Rada 1 sh.
>
I vote FOR.
> 7912* Alexis3.0 Election Campaigns Alexis 1 AP [2]
>
I vote FOR. I'm too lazy to look through everything it says but it sounds
cool. <-- noob way of voting
>
I support.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > I find this CFJ to be FALSE, following the caller’s arguments exactly.
> The alleged claim of error was
> >
> >> CoE this is bugging me.
> >
> > Sent in response to an attemp
Endorse G.
> Quazie: Endorse G unless that would lead to a vote for Quazie
> Trigon: Endorse G.
> PSS: {PSS, G}
> o.: The first player to unconditionally vote themselves (that is currently
> PSS)
>
> I issue Humiliating Public Reminders to myself (oh dear!), Aris,
> Murphy, 天火狐,
Nevermind, I think I had sent that when I didn't understand pf and
such. Your report is just fine. I retract my CoE (if that's possible, idk
if it is)
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:26 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> pf
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: ATMunn
pf
-- Forwarded message --
From: ATMunn .
Date: Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report
To: "Agora Nomic discussions (DF)"
CoE: A while back I paid Agora 17 shinies, in response to a request someone
made for everyone to g
pf
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:23 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I object, also because of Trust Tokens.
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I object because of Trust Tokens.
&g
I pend the proposal "Cheer Up v7?" with AP.
I'm a derp.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:20 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> [Okay. I think I've got it as I want. I'm going to pend it now, and this
> time for real.]
> I retract the proposal "Cheer Up v6?" and cre
sting, here it is in plain text:
https://pastebin.com/xdYSvB8H]
Title: "Cheer Up v7?"
Author: ATMunn
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registrar, with possible
values Joyous, Melancholy, and Indifferent, that defau
[Yay more spam! This time, fixed a typo and the weird text bug.]
Retract the proposal "Cheer Up vIDEK" and create the following proposal in
its place:
Title: "Cheer Up v6?"
Author: ATMunn
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player sw
[version I Don't Even Know]
Author: ATMunn
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player switch, tracked bu the registrar, with possible
values Joyous, Melancholy, and Indifferent, that defaults to Indifferent.
At any time, any player CAN by announcement
er Up"
Author: ATMunn
Co-Authors: none
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registrar, with possible
values Joyous, Melancholy, and Indifferent, that defaults to Indifferent.
At any time, any player CAN flip eir own Emotio
pat any
Melancholy player on the back. Upon doing this, the Melancholy player is
ENCOURAGED to change eir emotion to Joyous.
}
I then pend the proposal "Cheer Up" (or "Cheer Up v3", depending on how
that works) using 1 AP.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
I create the following proposal:
Title: "Cheer Up"
Author: ATMunn
Co-Authors: none
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registrar, with possible
values Joyous, Melancholy, and Indifferent, that defaults to Indiffer
I register as a new player.
601 - 695 of 695 matches
Mail list logo
