On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 08:36 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
Counterargument: act-on-behalf doesn't require a contract, it only
requires consent. The intent behind this case was to determine
whether Wooble's request constituted implicit consent (I expect not,
but this will set some interesting
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:42 -0500, comex wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
Patent nonsense, given the history of nicknames. NOT GUILTY.
I intend to appeal this with 2 support.
Arguments:
Huh? E did select such a nickname, and e would definitely be in
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 16:01 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
This distribution of proposals 6036-6049 initiates the Agoran
Decisions on whether to adopt them.
Welcome back PNP! Had a nice holiday?
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
6036 D 0 2.0 ais523
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:33 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
I intend, without 3 objections, to amend the PRS by removing clause 6
and adding the following clause:
{
8. The contestmaster of this contract SHALL award 10 points to
ais523, 2 points to Murphy and 4 points to root. After e does
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 11:31 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
PBA could be bought for 2268 coins; due to adjustments in the
intervening Monday midnights this is now a bit lower (I didn't
calculate how much). In any
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 17:40 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:53 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
[Summary: More y-points for me, to a total of 640, then a win
announcement.]
I initiate an Inquiry CFJ with the following statement: On or about
December 28, 2008, comex achieved
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:22 -0500, comex wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Charles Schaefer
chuckles11...@gmail.com wrote:
Inquiry CFJ: {The current Speaker is Michael Norrish.}
See CFJs 2155 and 1534.
Someone told me that I'm the Speaker now. I'm not entirely sure whether
I am or
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:11 -0500, comex wrote:
I intend, with the unanimous consent of the current Partners of the
AFO, to admit ais523 to it.
I intend, with the unanimous consent of the current Partners of the AFO,
to agree to it.
--
ais523
I judge as follows on CFJ 2320 (Four days and 5 hours from the time
this CFJ was/will be called, it will be possible to object to the above
intent., called just before a holiday in the same message as the
intent):
This case hinges around when the deadline for objection is for objecting
to a
[Sorry about the late results; this is for the Counterfeit and
Elucidated Numerology puzzles. There's still a couple of days left to
submit solutions for Rainbow Adjacencies.]
There were no eligible solutions for Elucidated Numerology, so nobody
scores any points for it.
For Counterfeit, I award
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 17:54 +, Alex Smith wrote:
Note that there is a missing award of either 4 points to Pavitra or 2
points to me, depending on whether Pavitra did indeed submit an eligible
solution or not.
I award 4 points to Pavitra, now I've had a chance to verify eir solution
I become sitting.
If today is exactly 86400 seconds long, I become leaning.
--
ais523
I consent to be contestmaster of any Y-axis contest of which comex and I
are the only parties, and to any attempts by comex to flip the
contestmaster of a contest that contains the Y-axis to me, within the
next hour.
--
ais523
I object to all attempts to perform dependent actions Without 3
Objections until the end of the current Holiday.
(I think that's 3 standing objections now. Without 1 objection is
already patched.)
--
ais523
Sorry, I've somehow managed to accidentally delete all the Enigma
submissions for this week. (Luckily, I remember who was first, so I can
still do the scoring correctly.) Could people resend their submissions,
so I can check them for correctness?
--
ais523
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 19:17 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
http://normish.org/
You also agree (binding under the rules of the nomic Agora) to the
public document submitted to Agora on December 25 2008 by ais523
whose title was The Small Partial Mousetrap, and agree to be bound
by it as an
I agree to the following document (called The Small Partial
Mousetrap), which will become a contract if at least one other person
agrees to it:
{{{
This is a private contract, binding under the rules of Agora. ais523
SHOULD attempt to announce changes in its text and membership as they
occur;
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 23:45 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
Any Player can send a public message to Agora with support and without
2 objections in 4 to 14 days.}
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:59 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I agree to the following public contract. I announce my intent
to make it a Contest w/o three objections and with myself as
contestmaster (oh crud this will
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 10:12 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
Without objection, I intend to terminate the following contract:
/dev/null (no parties)
I object. Again.
--
ais523
I submit an inquiry CFJ on the following statement: 'e' is primarily
used in a mathematical context, and therefore means 'approximately
2.718281828' when used in rules.
Arguments:
From rule 754/8:
{{{
(3) Any term primarily used in mathematical or legal contexts,
and not addressed by previous
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 15:52 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
OscarMeyr wrote:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6017 D1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 2140
6014 6015 6016 6017
OscarMeyr3F F F
AI1.7 2 3 3
VI2.6+
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 21:12 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 22:32 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
If a CFJ were called on X, it would be legal to judge FALSE on the
CFJ, where X is defined as the following string
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 11:03 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
Appeal 2303a
Panelist: Goethe
Panelist: ais523
Panelist:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:14 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
6027 D 1 2.0 Elysion none
FOR; this is not quite the same as the situation regarding 5707, as that
was about intents to affect things that didn't exist, so a
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 21:17 -0500, Joshua Boehme wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:29:09 -0800
Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Billy Pilgrim wrote:
I vote to lynch avpx. That werewolf
That's one. With 13 townspersons, we need 7 votes to lynch someone.
Works for me.
Sorry about the late announcement of the results for last week's Enigma,
I've been offline for a while.
There were no correct answers submitted to last week's Enigma puzzle;
therefore, no points are awarded. (Pavitra: feel free to publish the
solution to your puzzle, or alternatively to keep it
I submit the following proposal (AI=2, II=0, coauthor=Wooble,
Title=Contest NoVs correctly):
{{{
Replace A valid Notice of Violation is initially Uncontested if a Crime
is named, Contested otherwise. with A valid Notice of Violation is
initially Uncontested unless a Crime is named, Contested
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 12:52 -0800, Taral wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Without 3 objections I intend to amend the Vote Market thusly:
I object to all ehird's attempts to modify the Vote Market contract.
I also object to
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:43 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
I initiate an equity case against the PerlNomic Partnership; I believe
its parties are {Dvorak, Pavitra, Wooble, abliss, ais523, ehird, ihope
(=Warrigal), woggle}, but this is under dispute so may not be correct,
and the
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 10:02 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:15 PM, Taral wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I harvest 106 (the number of a recently amended power-3 rule) for 8
random crops.
I harvest 911 (the number
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 00:10 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I zoop a criminal case against the PerlNomic Partnership for violating
Rule 2215 by announcing that I am a party to it in the quoted message.
Arguments: Codenomics
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:38 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most-recently published
version of the Short Logical Ruleset, with a scope of the text of each
rule.
I object to this one, we should establish if the recent scam worked first.
I intend, without
I vote as follows on the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt proposals
below, where each decision is identified by the ID number of the related
proposal:
6014 FOR
6015 AGAINST
6016 PRESENT
6017 AGAINST (for now, let's sort out what the rules are first)
--
ais523
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 22:46 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
As CotC, I support each of these.
With support from Elysion and Murphy, I send the following message on
behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ 2277a:
{{{
Regardless of the prior judge's arguments, there is
another reason why this CFJ is clearly
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 11:32 -0800, Taral wrote:
Player Score
-
ais523 15
Hmm... looks like Murphy's about to win.
I request a 5-point PRS investment.
I buy a Digit Ranch.
--
ais523
(Unfortunately, the CFJs this one depends on still haven't been decided,
but I'm nearly out of time to legally judge it, so I have to submit
something; appeal this if my assumptions here are wrong. The appeals
panel in CFJs 2276a-2278a is now very overdue; root/Murphy, support my
and Elysion's
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 16:00 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
6010 D 2 2.0 ais523 Rests
FOR
6011 D 0 3.0 Bayes Repeal 'Definition Definitions'
FOR
6012 D 0 3.0 Bayes Repeal 'Vote Protection
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 07:45 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I judge FALSE on CFJ 2270 (i.e. it is NOT true that Neither Proposal
5956 nor Proposal 5962 has been adopted., because one of them was),
based on the protoprecedent
This week's puzzle is Numerology, by Pavitra:
{{{
I raise the ranks of the Theban foes.
I am Aaron and Leo and Craig.
I am the nights that the great rain flows
And the unhatched cosmic egg.
Unprimeable, I am connections;
The nineteenth found me gay.
My music passed ends woodwind sections:
I am the
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 09:03 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 17:00, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6010 D 2 2.0 ais523 Rests
FOR
6011 D 0 3.0 Bayes Repeal 'Definition Definitions'
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 16:55 -0500, comex wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:03 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
CROP WRV HOLDINGS
Farmer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 15:06 +, Alex Smith wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Speaker to assign prerogatives for
December.
Deputising for the Speaker, I assign prerogatives for December as
follows:
Pavitra: Wielder of Extra Votes [this may fail if Pavitra is not in fact
an MWoP
I call for judgement on the statement The Executor of the public
message that purported to initiate the Agoran Decisions on whether to
adopt proposals 5686-5687 cannot be determined with reasonable effort,
other than via a judicial declaration.
Evidence:
The message in question was sent by the
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 11:22 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:44 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
For each contract listed below, I intend (without objection, and
assuming I am elected Notary) to terminate it.
/dev/null
I object to this termination (but not to
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 12:02 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
6004 D 1 2.0 woggle Pragmatize Ribbons
PRESENT
6005 D 1 2.0 Murphy Contract precedence
AGAINST [doesn't a) mean that a contract can talk about
I PBA-withdraw a D,Eb,F,Ab,Bb,and B note credit, and two G note credits;
I then destroy all note markers I own by destroying all note credits I
own.
I agree to the following (which will become a public contract if someone
else agrees to it), called Note Exchange Automation (to make redeeming
note
I PBA-deposit 4 PV.
--
ais523
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 16:28 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 15:48, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't support, because I don't think the judge of the prior case
will make a better judgement if given a new opportunity (instead, I
think e will recuse emself). I intend,
The PerlNomic Partnership [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
5991 D 1 2.0 Elysion Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It v2
FOR
5992 D 0 2.0 Bayes none
AGAINST
5993 D 0 3.0 Bayes none
AGAINST
5994 D 1
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 10:56 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
For each contract whose text is quoted below, I intend (without
objection, assuming I am elected Notary) to terminate it.
Mon 20 Oct 21:41:29 Crescendo created and amended by ais523
This is a pledge and a public contract named
I intend, without objection, to make Goethe inactive.
[ The following proposal is based on Goethe's last proto on the matter
with suggestions from others incorporated; also, people have been
shouting at me (who originally protoed it) for not proposing it in ages.
I kept the names Notice of
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 18:41 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Demoted to Delta: Bayes (twice!) (2nd class, weakest exemption, forced)
CoE: According to rule 2211, you SHALL NOT demote the same person twice;
the 4th paragraph includes at each step choosing (if possible) a player
who has not yet
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 15:50 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alexander Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I PRS-invest 5 points.
me too.
Now it's a new week, I PRS-invest another 5 points.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 15:07 -0600, Pavitra wrote:
I leave the Vote Market.
I post 22 Buy Tickets, each with a cost of 1VP, and an action of
transferring ^14 to me.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 17:42 -0800, Charles Reiss wrote:
I [attempt to] purchase a Digit Ranch.
I attempt to purchase a Digit Ranch.
I attempt to purchase a Mill.
--
ais523
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:21 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I post 22 Buy Tickets, each with a cost of 1VP, and an action of
transferring ^14 to me.
I fill all of these tickets. I RBoA-deposit 22 VP.
If I now have exactly
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 19:23 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
I intent, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case against BobTHJ
for failing to assign prerogatives for December in a timely fashion
before the beginning of the month, as required by Rule 2019.
I act on behalf of comex to cause comex to
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 17:50 +, Alexander Smith wrote:
I intend, with support from two of {Elysion, root, the
CotC}, to send the following message on behalf of the
judicial panel in CFJ 2277a:
{{{
Regardless of the prior judge's arguments, there is
another reason why this CFJ is clearly
I know Warrigal doesn't want REMAND, but it seems like the appropriate
judgement here so that e can consider the arguments that have been made
since eir judgement. I suggest e recuses emself once it's remanded.
I intend, with the support of two of {BobTHJ, comex, the CotC}, to send
the following
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 17:48 -0500, comex wrote:
I don't support, because I don't think the judge of the prior case
will make a better judgement if given a new opportunity (instead, I
think e will recuse emself). I intend, with the support of two of
{ais523, BobTHJ, the CotC}, to send the
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 15:42 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Registrar for the purpose of awarding the
Patent Title of Left in a Huff to P1-P100.
--
ais523
Ex-Registrar
I intend to deputize for the Registrar for the purpose of awarding the
Patent Title of Left in a
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 22:39 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2273a
Appeal 2273a
I spend a Favour to call in a Favour on CFJ 2273, specifying ALREADY
TRIED. I note that there are two
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 12:58 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I nominate ais523, BobTHJ, ehird, root, Wooble, and Murphy as Notary.
I decline for now; I'm pretty busy in RL, and wouldn't have enough time
to avoid becoming backlogged with it.
--
ais523
I intend to deputise for the Notary to inform the judge of an equity CFJ
pertaining to the UNDEAD of its text and membership.
--
ais523
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 06:24 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
5985 D 1 2.0 Murphy Fix VLOD increases
AGAINST. I like the idea, but this would arguably make things worse.
(For instance, if a player's caste changes, does
I CFJ on the statement The Ambassador CAN flip Wooble's Recognition to
Friendly without objection..
Arguments: This is really about whether Wooble is a nomic or not,
phrased such that I have a miniscule chance of a random Win by Paradox.
A nomic ruleset is defined as follows:
{{{
A nomic
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 19:22 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
5982 D 1 2.0 Murphy Win by Junta
FOR
5983 D 1 3.0 WarrigalStronger Depatation
FOR
5984 D 2 2.0 Wooble Party Politics
FOR
--
CFJ 2264: Contracts CAN be amended by a mechanism other than unanimous
consent of all parties.
I think that this one is pretty trivially TRUE. However, whether the
resulting amended contract is effective is an interesting question; R101
might prevent its effectiveness. According to rule 101(iv),
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 20:33 -0500, comex wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is unreasonable to extrapolate the chamber of a proposal (as
distinguished from its decision) from AI, as AI serves no purpose
chamber-wise other than to determine the
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 15:45 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, what the hey. I join the Agoran Loan Service. I request a loan
of 1000 coins or less.
Meh,
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 15:07 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I post a Buy Ticket, with a cost of 189 coins, specifying an action of
transferring 215 coins to me within the next 2 weeks.
191 coins within one week, and you've got
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 11:25 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I judge CFJs 2276-78 TRUE.
None of the purported attempts to resolve the Agoran Decisions to
adopt the proposals in question contained an accurate tally of the
valid ballots cast, and thus they all fail to meet R208's requirements
to
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 10:40 -0600, Pavitra wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Nov 2008, at 16:31, Alex Smith wrote:
I intend to appeal this with 2 support. Increasing a player's voting
limit on a decision causes it to be higher than
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 16:43 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Nov 2008, at 16:40, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
R2156 says the voting limit is not the voting limit defaults to or
begins at, subject to modification
is could be interpreted, and IMO in the prescense of the one-offs
rule,
should
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 08:55 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
Quazie has been killed. The first night phase ends; the second
day phase begins.
The remaining townspersons are:
root, Wooble, ais523, ehird, Pavitra, avpx, comex, 0x44
Five votes are needed to lynch someone.
Continuing the theme of
I PBA-deposit all my Favours.
--
ais523
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:40 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Agreed, the following gratuitous arguments were not circulated with the case;
I repeat them:
Gratuitous counterargument:
R2156, in defining that a voting limit *is* a caste level (as opposed
to saying is set to a caste level)
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 13:04 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
An important missing piece in your argument is that I used R1586 to
argue for definitional preference. R2 is actually in conflict with R1586
as well as R1. In particular from R1586:
I vote for Wooble in Werewolves.
--
ais523
I PBA-deposit all my PV (I think that's 3 of them).
--
ais523
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 15:03 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
I also nominate ais523.
I decline for the time being. Agora mail's going too quickly for me to
keep up with atm, due to being busier than usual in Real Life.
--
ais523
I hem-and-haw.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 16:50 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
Caller's arguments:
Rule 2156 purports to define an eligible voter's voting limit, not
merely eir initial or base voting limit. Thus, after Rule 2126
increased ehird's voting limit, Rule 2156 reasserted itself and
reset it to eir caste.
I PBA-deposit two 8 Crops. (I would deposit more, but am not sure how
many I have; I know I have at least two, though.)
--
ais523
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 13:38 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
As ehird is not a person and has never been a first-class person, I
hereby deregister em by announcement.
I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal CFJ against Wooble for
violating rule 2215 by making a public statement in the
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 13:48 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 18:44, Alex Smith wrote:
I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal CFJ against Wooble for
violating rule 2215 by making a public statement
No Enigma puzzles this week; ehird submitted What is 2+2? again, but
per section 8 of Enigma I will award points as if all answers on that
question are incorrect (due to the question being so easy as to be
uninteresting), thus nobody will score any points for it and there's no
point in submitting
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 10:15 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
*5842 D3 1.0 P9 Points for Me
*5843 D3 1.0 P99 Points for Me
*5844 D3 1.0 P100Points for Me
[snip]
P9 is the only contract which has a chance of becoming a contest; the
other 99 proposals are not powerful
I RBoA-deposit a 9 Crop.
I RBoA-withdraw three 0 Crops.
The AFO wrote (in two separate messages):
Rule 1607 (The Promotor) from 1 to 2;
I harvest 1607, a recently amended power-2 rule, for 6 random crops.
Rule 1367 (Degrees) from 1.5 to 1;
I harvest 1367, a recently amended power-1 rule,
(CFJ 2249: There is an asset known as the Terre Haute.)
Judgement on CFJ 2249:
Let's see what happened here. No Rochelle O'Shea owned at least one
asset when the contract was created, so it defined the Terre Haute as
Santa Claus; it also defines it as an asset. There is no contradiction
yet, we
(CFJ 2256: Creating a contract in a public message constitutes an
implicit but nevertheless clear indication that it will be public when
it forms, unless published with an explicit and clear indication to the
contrary.)
(CFJ 2257: Creating a pledge in a public message constitutes an implicit
but
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published Short
Logical Ruleset.
--
ais523
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 08:58 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, with the support of ais523 and BobTHJ, to cause the panel to
publish the following:
{{
We judge AFFIRM with an error rating of 74 and the following concurring
opinion:
Game custom holds that terms defined in contracts
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 11:47 +, Alexander Smith wrote:
Goethe wrote:
I go on hold.
I suggest a new election for Herald.
I intend to deputise for the Herald for the purposes of awarding me
two instances of Champion.
I deputise for the Herald to award ais523 the Patent Title of Champion,
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 10:00 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
Have I voted on these yet? I vote as follows (these will be invalid if
I've already voted):
5942 O 0 1.0 woggle Transporter Accident Repair
FORx5
5943 D 1 2.0 woggle
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 18:29 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
I vote as follows:
5946 D 1 3.0 Murphy Faster repair of botched AIs
AGAINST
5947 D 1 3.0 ais523 Balance of Power
FOR
--
ais523
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 17:08 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal: Fix elections, this time for real
I agree to the following
{
This is a pledge, and a public contract. Anyone may act on behalf of
Sgeo to cause Sgeo to vote FOR the
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 17:23 -0800, Taral wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Equity Case 2215 ==
BobTHJ created 11 crops in ais523's possession when e should
have only created 9 [3 for
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 18:32 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I resign from each and every public contract of which (a) I am a member
and (b) the contract allows me to exit at this time.
Resign seems a clear synonym for leave here.
However, this only affects the Fantasy Rules Contest; you aren't a
801 - 900 of 1005 matches
Mail list logo
