I hereby confirm that I'm changing my primary address to a
zoho.com account.
-Murphy
omd wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to initiate the new officeholder for each listed
office. For each decision, the valid options are all players, and I am the
vote collector. (As I noted previously, although the nomination period of an
election is currently undefined, I have made the
omd wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:12 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to initiate the new officeholder for each listed
office. For each decision, the valid options are all players, and I am the
vote collector. (As I noted previously, although the nomination
7643 Henri1 Mandatory Identification
AGAINST
7644 Yally1 Make the Birthday Holiday line up with
FOR
7645 omd 2 Election fix
FOR
7646 omd 2 Latin fix
PRESENT
7647 omd 3
7641 scshunt 2 Relative Months
FOR
7642 Fool3 On breaking the game
AGAINT
omd wrote:
I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the new Speaker. For this
decision, the vote collector is the IADoP; as with all decisions, the
eligible voters are the active players at the time of initiation; and
the options (in order of nomination) are:
omd
scshunt
G.
ENDORSE G.
7625 Shredder1 OPostmodern Poetry
PRESENT
7626 omd 1.5 OChampion fix
PRESENT
I register.
I sit.
7615 Henri 1 O The Initiation of the Great Reset...
PRESENT
7616 G. 2 O Mostly Simple Judging v2.3
FOR
7617 G. 2 O A Complex Game 2
FOR
If I'm not a player, I register.
If I'm not active, I become active.
I object to any/all intents to deregister/deactivate me.
I vote PRESENT on all decisions currently in their voting periods.
Regarding ais523's proposal to change quorum, I suggest retaining a
minimum of 5 or the number of
HONK
Proposal: Obvious rule patch
(AI = 2, co-authors = Bayushi and ais523)
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing part (e) of the section on
GUILTY with this text:
(e) the defendant could have reasonably avoided committing the
breach without thereby committing a different
7601 Ienpw III 1 O 0 I0 - none
FOR
7602 OscarMeyr 1 O 0 I0 - THE INSANE REPEALS, PART A
FOR
7603 OscarMeyr 1 O 0 I0 - THE INSANE REPEALS, PART B
AGAINST
7604 G. 1 O 0 I0 - Come back woggle!
FOR (though
7595 scshunt 2 O 40 I0 Best Better Interest
PRESENT
7600 scshunt 3 O 120 I0 Best Handshake Deals are Enough
FOR
7587 1.5 0 O G. *Repeal Initial Posture
PRESENT
7588 20 O G. *No Speaker Waste
PRESENT
7589 30 O G. *Unpromising
FOR
7590 Walker1 O 30 I1 - AWJ
PRESENT
7591 scshunt 3 O 20 I1 Best Conflicts of Interest
FOR
7592 scshunt 1 O 40 I1 Best Okinawhat?
FOR
7593 scshunt 2 O 80 I1 Best You Don't Have To Go Home
PRESENT
7594 scshunt 3 O 80
I wrote:
With notice, I intend to destroy my promise Power of attorney.
I do so.
With notice, I intend to destroy my promise Power of attorney. I
apologize for starting a trend, and pass the ammo. And sit.
Roujo wrote:
Detail: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3367
= Criminal Case 3367 =
I violated the rule enacted by Proposal 7490 by discussing my
vote on Proposal 7491 when listing all votes in its resolution.
I wrote:
I create the following promise and transfer it to G.:
* Text: I act as specified by the casher in the same message
as the cashing.
* Title: Murphy 20130703 Trust Fund
* Condition to cash: The casher is a player.
* Condition to not be destroyed when cashed: The casher
7526 20 O woggle Yak Cleanup Grammar Fixes
FOR
7527 10 O Murphy Within measurable distance of its end
FOR
7528 2 50 O omd Voting auctions
PRESENT
7529 20 O omd The Wisconsin Line-Item Veto
FOR
scshunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decisions to select the holders of the
offices of Ambassador-At-Large and Promotor. The vote collector is the
IADoP; the eligible voters are the active first-class players.
The candidates for Ambassador-At-Large are Walker and Roujo.
I endorse
7516 1.5 0 O G. Badges Badges Badges Badges
FOR
7517 10 O Lindar (untitled)
AGAINST. The official flavour of Agora should be MUSHROOM MUSHROOM.
7518 1.5 0 O Yally Jumping Posture
PRESENT
7519 30 O omd, etc. fixed fixed Gerontocracy fix
PRESENT
7520 30
omd wrote:
Amend the Rule enacted by Proposal 7490 (Funcentives) by replacing:
Players SHALL NOT discuss eir votes
with:
Players SHALL NOT discuss their votes
--
By the way, that rule is quite broken as it prohibits discussing votes
even after the end of the voting period.
I wrote:
Proposal: Within measurable distance of its end
Amend the Rule enacted by Proposal 7490 (Funcentives) by replacing:
votes on proposals in the Star Chamber.
with:
votes on a proposal in the Star Chamber during that proposal's
voting period.
I retract the
3355: NOT GUILTY
To my knowledge, ais523 only used this nickname in a-d in messages
pertaining to Agora XX. It was reasonably simple to distinguish
which messages in a-d pertained to Agora XX, and within that context,
the nickname issue was not significantly more confusing compared to
3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no party's
constitution currently does so.
7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
FOR
7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
FOR
7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
AGAINST (already true by lack of ambiguity)
7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
FOR
7486 20 O D scshunt Clearing Up
FOR
7487 3
7499 1 10 O scshunt Ribbon power fix
PRESENT
7500 10 O D FoolSome Nomics end normally.
FOR
7501 30 O D scshunt Star Quorum Cleanups
AGAINST
7502 30 O D FoolStar Quorum Cleanups bis.
FOR
I create the following promise and transfer it to G.:
* Text: I act as specified by the casher in the same message
as the cashing.
* Title: Murphy 20130703 Trust Fund
* Condition to cash: The casher is a player.
* Condition to not be destroyed when cashed: The casher is a player.
Machiavelli wrote:
I join UNDEAD.
CoE: Over my dead body you do!
omd wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
All stasis timers are at their default value of 0.
CoE: Murphy's was not.
Admitted. Correction: it was 7 days at 16 Jun 2013 09:06:07
Roujo wrote:
Detail: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3329
= Criminal Case 3329 =
scshunt has failed to submit an IADoP's report for this week,
and in doing so has violated Rule 2143.
: 23 Jun 2013 18:10:09 GMT
Appellant scshunt's Arguments:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend (with 2 support) to make this case Notable, suggesting Rule
1504
Walker wrote:
On 23 Jun 2013, at 21:57, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I initiate elections for Comic Book Guy, Assessor, and Herald.
I nominate Murphy.
I accept Comic Book Guy and Herald.
Roujo wrote:
Detail: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3327
== CFJ 3327 ==
It was POSSIBLE for me to cash 'ZipZop Series G-002' when I
attempted to do so.
Proposal: Lateral transfer
Amend Rule 2138 (The Interstellar Associate Director of Personnel) by
changing Interstellar to Interdimensional in its text and title.
I wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the following:
As of 12 May 2013 00:00:00 UTC, the Police Vigilance Number (PVN) was 0
and all players were Virtuous.
(I believe this to be correct anyway, given the lack of CFJs containing
the text taunt or naught since the adoption of the PVN
I wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the following -delimited
text:
scshunt registered on or about Mon Apr 1 18:04:26 UTC 2013, and has been
continuously registered from that time to the time the first intent to
ratify this text was published.
Machiavelli became inactive on or
Proposal: Not that large
(AI = 2)
Amend Rule 2378 (Court Protector) by replacing this text:
A CFJ may be submitted to the Ambassador-At-Large.
with this text:
When initiating a judicial case, a person CAN submit it to the
Ambassador-At-Large by clearly announcing that e does
I don't think one out of three panelists constitutes a majority
opinion (Rules 2341 and 2342). I cause the panel in 3318a to
judge it REMAND without prejudice.
I recuse Ienpw III from CFJ 3327.
I recuse Henri from CFJ 3329.
I wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 7426-34:
[This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
*7426 1.0 omd Non-reporting Office
I wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 7435-36:
[This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
x7435 2.0 scshunt Numericity
!7436 3.0
scshunt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
CoE: Since quorum was 6, Proposal 7435 had only 5 votes, so the voting
period was extended and my votes were valid. Hence it was adopted.
Rejected. Proposal 7435 had 6 votes.
CoE, accepted:
omd wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
omd's CoE quorum was 5 and G.'s CoE regarding missed votes are
rejected as inaccurate.
CoE on all purported resolutions in the last hour: As far as I can
tell, the timeline is as follows:
12 May 2013 03:12:31
omd wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CoE, accepted: Proposal 7436 had 5 votes during the normal voting
period, so it was extended and scshunt's votes were valid.
CoE: Quorum was 5, as per my previous CoE.
Rejected, as per my response to said
omd wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Quorum6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Voters5 5 5 5 5 4 5
CoE: At the very least, Machiavelli was inactive at the time of
distribution. Quorum was 5.
Denied
I change all sitting players to standing.
3330: FALSE. A substantially similar question was asked and
answered in CFJ 2361, and I'm not aware of anything in the
current rules that would invalidate that precedent.
3320a: REMAND without prejudice.
I wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the following:
As of 12 May 2013 00:00:00 UTC, the Police Vigilance Number (PVN) was 0
and all players were Virtuous.
(I believe this to be correct anyway, given the lack of CFJs containing
the text taunt or naught since the adoption of the PVN
I wrote:
Clerk's Docket
CoE, accepted: FSX and Tomas are inactive. Arkady, moonroof, and
Phlogistique are deregistered. (All corrected in draft.)
I wrote:
Clerk's Docket
Posture (Rule 1871) of active players
Additional CoE, accepted: ais523 is inactive.
omd wrote:
I deputise for the Assessor to publish the following:
Voting results for Proposals 7426-36:
[This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED
7444 3 omd Make implicit votes sensitive to voting limit
..increases
PRESENT (I'm starting to delay entry of vote*1000 type votes until
the end, and would do so across the board if this is adopted)
7445 3 omd relative dimension in sanity
FOR
7446 3
7437 1 Roujo(untitled)
FOR
7438 2 ais523 Fix adoption index tracking
FOR
7439 1 woggle he - e
FOR
7440 1 woggle When ., - When ,
FOR
7441 1 Walker (untitled)
FOR
7442 1 scshunt No Recordkeeping Burden
AGAINST (missing create a rule with
omd wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
woggle 4F4A A+3P 4P4F4P4F4P
CoE: woggle voted PRESENT on 7419.
Admitted, corrected in database.
I resolve the decision on 7419 as follows (same as before except
I wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 7426-34:
[This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
*7426 1.0 omd Non-reporting Office
I recuse Tomas from CFJ 3322.
omd wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CoE: 7426, 7427, and 7430 failed quorum. (Not yet admitted, to give
others a chance to double-check that 7 was the correct minimum.)
CoE on all recent attempts to resolve 7426-36: There were 15 active
first
Bucky wrote:
I cause the BPPP to attempt to register (with Agoran Consent).
CFJ: The message quoted in evidence is equivalent to an announcement of
intent to register.
Evidence: The above-quoted message.
I intend, without objection, to ratify the following:
As of 12 May 2013 00:00:00 UTC, the Police Vigilance Number (PVN) was 0
and all players were Virtuous.
(I believe this to be correct anyway, given the lack of CFJs containing
the text taunt or naught since the adoption of the PVN and
scshunt wrote:
I initiate criminal CFJs alleging the following:
That Murphy violated Rule 2143 by failing to report on the PVN and on
Virtue last week.
Defendant's arguments:
1) To my knowledge, PVN is not required to be reported.
2) To my knowledge, each player's Virtue is at its default
omd wrote:
I spend 3 VCs to increase G.'s VVLOP by 3.
From 9 to 12, thus resetting VVLOPs and destroying VCs.
I wrote:
Proposal: No news is important news
(AI = 2)
I retract this proposal. (Already covered by Rule 2379.)
I recuse Tomas from CFJ 3310.
Causing a rule to become a Slave Golem would modify that rule, and
would not fit within the mechanism of Rule 105 (Power=3), so Rule 105
prevents it from occurring. FALSE.
7418 2 omd Higher order
PRESENT
7419 3 omd Clear the books
PRESENT
7420 3 omd We don't need to be that idiosyncratic un-derp
.. version
PRESENT
7421 3 G.What you WILL
PRESENT
7422 3 omd Interpretation
7416 3 omd Not my job
PRESENT
7417 1 Roujo Blackmail is no fun
FOR
The author of promise ODY-1 is simply a broken reference and does not
cause ODY-1 to cease to exist, any more than the king of England
causes England to do so. ODY-1 exists, it can be cashed, but the effect
of cashing (including creating a copy of itself) is ineffective due to
the broken
Roujo wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Clerk's Docket
[snip]
G. (3305) (Ambassador-at-Large)
CoE: I'm the Ambassador-at-Large.
Admitted. I've removed this from the draft, as it's adequately covered
by the IADoP's
Proposal: Limit favoritism
(AI = 2)
Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by replacing this text:
A player CAN favor or disfavor a judicial case by announcement.
When assigning a judge to a judicial case, the CotC, if
possible, SHALL assign a player who has favored it
I recuse Wes from CFJ 3300.
7405 2 omd Nerf VCs
FOR
7414 1 Roujo (untitled)
AGAINT
7415 1 G. Classic Nomic Ribbon
PRESENT
scshunt wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
VVLOPs (Rule 2389)
--
7 ais523
9 G.
9 Machiavelli
7 woggle
4 all other players
CoE: My VVLOP is 6 and ais523's VVLOP is 8.
Admitted. (I hadn't gotten to that message yet.)
woggle wrote:
I hereby make the following claims of error concerning the purported
resolution of decisions on proposals 7364-7395:
On 4/20/13 14:44 , Ed Murphy wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 7364 - 7395:
[snip]
!7382 1.0 omd Плутократия!
* Proposal 7382 did not fail quorum
Machiavelli wrote:
For each listed office, I initiate the Agoran Decision to determine
the new officeholder. For these decisions, the eligible voters are the
active first-class players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the
valid options are the nominees listed (PRESENT is also a valid
7396 1.0 Ordinary omd Plan B
AGAINST
7397 3.0 Democrat scshunt Approaching 20
FOR
7398 1.5 Ordinary scshunt Credit Where It's Due
PRESENT
7399 3.0 Ordinary Machiavelli FIFO
PRESENT
7400 2.0 Ordinary scshunt Meaningful fines
FOR
7401 3.0 Ordinary
I intend, without objection, to add a Dictionary entry defining
AGAINT as no vote.
3302: FALSE. scshunt can do this for some proposals (AI = 1 and
outcome = ADOPTED) but not others.
woggle wrote:
I intend, with 4 Elder support, to set the Adoption Index of the Agoran
Decision to adopt Proposal 7358 to 8.
I support.
woggle wrote:
On 4/10/13 12:45 , Tanner Swett wrote:
[snip]
7382 1.0 Plutocra omd Плутократия!
I intend, with 2 Elder support, to make the decision to adopt Proposal 7382
Gerontocratic.
I intend, with 3 Agoran consent, to make the decision to adopt Proposal 7382
Democratic.
I
woggle wrote:
I intend, with 3 Agoran consent, to make the decision to adopt proposal 7384
Democratic.
I intend, with 2 Elder support, to make the decision to adopt proposal 7384
Gerontocratic.
I support both.
Machiavelli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I intend, with two support, to make this case Notable, suggesting Rule 2143.
I support.
AOL!
Machiavelli wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to make the following CFJs Notable:
3196, suggesting Rule 2127
3224, suggesting Rule 1551
2916, suggesting Rule 478
3289, suggesting Rule 478
3197, suggesting Rule 478
7364 1.0 Ordinary G. Ribbon Evolution
PRESENT
7365 1.0 Ordinary RoujoMarket Failure
PRESENT
7366 1.0 Ordinary RoujoCascading Market Failure
PRESENT
7367 3.0 Ordinary scshunt Series Reboot
AGAINST
7368 3.0 Ordinary Wes
FOR
7369 1.0 Ordinary
7356 1.5 Ordinary G. Aveho Justitiarius!
FOR
7357 3.0 Ordinary G. Controlling Interest
FOR
7358 1.0 Ordinary G. Proxy Victory
FOR
7359 1.0 Ordinary G. Proxy Loss
FOR
7360 3.0 Ordinary G. Proxy Voting
FOR
7361 2.0
On 4/1/2013 9:19 PM, Joe Vasoli wrote:
*From:* Joseph terminus...@hotmail.com mailto:terminus...@hotmail.com
*Date:* April 2, 2013, 12:14:08 AM EDT
*To:* tue75...@temple.edu mailto:tue75...@temple.edu
tue75...@temple.edu mailto:tue75...@temple.edu
*Subject:* *Agora*
ID AI CHAMBER
I transfer a prop from myself (for losing these in the shuffle) to G.
(for noticing).
Voting results for Proposals 7344 - 7348:
[This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
Agora are ADOPTED (*),
G. wrote:
I intend to flip Speed to Normal with Agoran Consent.
I support.
7351 3.0 Ordinary G. Definition merge
FOR
7352 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Postregistration transparency
PRESENT
7353 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Renaissance unribbonworthiness
PRESENT
I wrote:
I wrote:
On or about Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:44:22 -0800, I wrote:
Clerk's Docket
Posture (Rule 1871) of active players
-
Standing: (none)
Sitting: ais523 (was standing)
Antony (3289)
G. (was
I recuse omd from CFJs 3289 and 3294.
ehird wrote:
On 11 March 2013 18:52, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Date of this report: ...
CoE: The date of the quoted report is not
Admitted, it was 11 Mar 13. (Obviously I missed editing that part
before sending it out.)
I wrote:
On or about Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:44:22 -0800, I wrote:
Clerk's Docket
Posture (Rule 1871) of active players
-
Standing: (none)
Sitting: ais523 (was standing)
Antony (3289)
G. (was supine)
7334 3.0 Ordinary woggle Precedence of unnumbered rules
FOR
7335 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Golem stripping
PRESENT
7336 2.0 Ordinary woggle Down with Rubles
PRESENT
7344 2.0 Ordinary BuckyBot Vvlop fixes?
PRESENT
7345 3.0 Ordinary woggle Power of the Elders
FOR
7346 1.5 Ordinary G. Disimposture
AGAINST
7347 2.0 Ordinary G. A different Protector
PRESENT
7348 2.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Fixed vvlop fixes?
On or about Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:44:22 -0800, I wrote:
Clerk's Docket
Posture (Rule 1871) of active players
-
Standing: (none)
Sitting: ais523 (was standing)
Antony (3289)
G. (was supine)
Italy
1 - 100 of 2714 matches
Mail list logo
