Re: DIS: Re: OFF: The game

I'm not actually participating in the game, so that was deliberate. If somebody wants to actually submit the customary new player cfj, go for it. On Fri, Nov 27, 2015, 1:06 PM Edward Murphy <emurph...@zoho.com> wrote: > On 11/26/2015 7:36 AM, Craig Daniel wrote: > > > Cfj: th

DIS: Re: OFF: The game

Cfj: the below represents an expression of intent to become a player under the name of "G", posted to a public forum. On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, 6:03 AM ais523 wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:50 -0500, Goodwin Lu wrote: > > Hello, I believe you are the listing to

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Returning Officer] Party Rules

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/09/2013 5:14 PM, Charles Walker wrote: On 1 September 2013 22:13, Craig Danielteu...@pobox.com wrote: COE: missing the Ludocratic Party, which formed earlier today. Admitted. CoE^2: no it didn't. Zombie-induced

Re: DIS: nommit challenges you to a game of chess!

I think it would be up to each nomic how to come up with its moves. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote: wait would we discuss aech move as a group before submission or is there just one player who makes those decisions On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM,

Re: DIS: nommit challenges you to a game of chess!

I dunno, officer can do it with Agoran Consent seems pretty thoroughly Agoran to me. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: I think it would be properly Agoran to have our move adopted by proposal. Though we would need some mechanism to resolve

Re: DIS: nommit challenges you to a game of chess!

Right. You can also get very different gameplay starting from precisely the same initial rules - look at Agora vs. B in the era when its ruleset was derived from an Agoran one. That's because even if the rules start the same, they evolve - that's what makes it nomic! On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:39

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Tibetan Contest

Proto: Contestkeepor. On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Charles Walker wrote: The Contestmastor AAA! It should only apply to -keepor dammit! :( Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

I'd suggest the same, if I were an elder and thus empowered to do so. (I'd've even suggested it after Sam, who might after all turn out to be a real person who for some reason just happens to share an e-mail address with Walker.) On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 Aug 2013, at 22:06, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: I'd suggest the same, if I were an elder and thus empowered to do so. (I'd've even suggested it after Sam, who might after all turn out to be a real

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Charles Walker wrote: On 14 Aug 2013, at 22:14, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 Aug 2013, at 22:06

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

take their own actions in the nearish future. Which, Will and Ian, if you've registered for the discussion list and thereby seen me admit this and thereby damaged the secrecy of the ploy in question, I've probably already succeeded, haven't I, so there.) On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Craig Daniel

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Craig Daniel wrote: ...I further note, btw, that Will and Ian are both people I had previously pointed out the existence of Agora to, and I've pointed them both at the rules so they can review those

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Craig Daniel wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Craig Daniel wrote: ...I further note, btw, that Will and Ian are both people I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Craig Daniel wrote: If a person has sufficient active volition to continue submitting the set of messages to the PF that eir houngan asks for... Ah, you're talking about a more general type

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sure Why Not

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Craig Daniel wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Craig Daniel wrote: If a person has sufficient active volition to continue

Re: DIS: [Ambassador-at-Large] Note on nommit

Absolutely! Nothing wrong with it, any more than there's something wrong with playing two games of chess at once. Less, even, since outside of showing off it's considered polite to give the one chess game you're in all your attention until it ends. On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Max Schutz

Re: DIS: [Ambassador-at-Large] Note on nommit

...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: Absolutely! Nothing wrong with it, any more than there's something wrong with playing two games of chess at once. Less, even, since outside of showing off it's considered polite to give the one chess

Re: DIS: [Ambassador-at-Large] Note on nommit

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:51 PM, James Beirne james.m.bei...@gmail.comwrote: Absolutely! Nothing wrong with it, any more than there's something wrong with playing two games of chess at once. Now I'm getting ideas for Bughouse nomic Any rule that gets repealed from Nomic A becomes a part of

DIS: [Attn: Ambassador] Tangenomic

http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?690987-Tangenomic-VI Tangency is the off-topic forum on RPG.net (requires registration, is free). It's tried playing nomic in-forum, several times. This is the most recent attempt, is brand new, and is about to resolve a proposal declaring itself a

DIS: Re: OFF: Judgement, CFJ 3381

::applause:: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: - Teucer's counterscam failed to allow em to repeal rules (no opinion on whether it's a paradox) I note that, while you profess no opinion, you pointed out the way in which it very probably fails to create a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (corrected) Judgement: CFJ 3383

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote: Oh, and further arguments: I think that the please treat Agora right good forever clause is vague enough that it should not be punishable in cases of negligence, but only in cases of actual malice. —Machiavelli I

DIS: Proto: newbie friendliness

The Tutor is an office whose holdor is responsible for maintaining the Tutorial. The Tutor CAN edit the Tutorial at any time, and SHOULD do so as necessary to keep it current and accurate. The Tutor also SHALL make sure the current text of the Tutorial is easy for prospective players to find. The

Re: DIS: Proto: newbie friendliness

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 August 2013 16:57, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: The Tutor is an office whose holdor is responsible for maintaining the Tutorial. The Tutor CAN edit the Tutorial at any time, and SHOULD do so

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3381 assigned to ais523

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 10:24 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote: The above is intended primarily to weigh in on the subject of the success of Fool's scam. However, just in case it was buggy (case 2 or 4 above), I submit the following

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: posture

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote: wait why are you cfj'ing this Because that is the customary way of resolving matters of ambiguity.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote: wait we have to re-register again No. Well, not unless Wooble.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 August 2013 20:49, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote: An alternate viewpoint: CoE since ratification will probably be fixed in the next

Re: DIS: Future of Agora

On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 4 August 2013 05:01, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: Man, I've tried that with B. Server discontinuities make it more difficult than it's likely to be for Agora, to the point where as far as I can tell

Re: DIS: Future of Agora

On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 4 August 2013 09:43, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I'm not going to tell you that you *can't* have the fun of reconstructing your own personal platonic state (to each eir own), but if it bogs us

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: speak your mind

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote: as long as that rule set becomes more accessible in its current state and length it is borderline insane Agora has a long history of being borderline insane. (This in contrast to B, where there was nothing borderline

Re: DIS: Future of Agora

On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 4 August 2013 02:54, com...@gmail.com wrote: You may argue that after this long, there is probably *some* other reason why the platonic gamestate is wrong, and a few have been proposed over the years.

DIS: Re: BUS: Question for Platonists (not about dictators)

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:45 -0400, Fool wrote: I submit the following proposal: === Agora pulls a B (AI=3.1, PF=0, disi.) In rule 1551 (Ratification, Power=3.1), replace the sentence: Ratifying a public

Re: DIS: Would I be an Elder if I registered?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:32 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matt Berlin arkes...@gmail.com wrote: An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered continuously for at least 32 days Future Perfect Progressive Tense ( ie, happened in the past, is still

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Igora

I'm reminded of the PGo subgame from B Nomic back before everything crashed. Not sure if I can dig up exactly how that worked, but it would be worth looking at (it was one of B's greatest hits, IMO). - teucer On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Thu,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: It tolls for B

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 25 February 2013 19:10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip the Recognition of B Nomic spoon-busin...@nomic.net to Abandoned. Having recently come out of a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Gameplay Ho!

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: If you wanted a dictatorship in the true spirit of Agora, try scamming a non-player into the dictator position. -- OscarMeyr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Gameplay Ho!

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Is Abraham Lincoln the name of a person? Yes it is. I'd say it's arguable - well, maybe a clearer example, since dead persons can be considered persons

DIS: Re: BUS: New Gameplay Ho!

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: This is a dictatorship acting well outside of the limited, reward-focused bounds a scam should go. I deregister. This is a scam that frightens off ehird. I register. (NttPF status intentional.)

DIS: Re: BUS: Name Change

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:02 PM, moonroof roycewoods...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, and if it is not too much trouble, I would like to change my nickname from WoodsPam to moonroof. (I am known as moonroof on BlogNomic). CFJ: It's not too much trouble. (Hey, we just had an uncontroversial registration,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A meta-CFJ

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: The might reasonably makes this so squishy as to be trivially true; all we have to show is that there is at least one cfj that might be interpreted this way, and I think we've got at least one in the database.  -G. So

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Was planning to fix anyway...

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 13:15 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:       Any person who wins the game while knowingly breaking a Rule,       or while knowingly being a party to a Rules breach,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Was planning to fix anyway...

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:42 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 16:36 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote: (I also do like stripping cheaters of *all* Champion titles, much as the Olympics strip them of medals even from before the cheating.) I'm personally worried about

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Was planning to fix anyway...

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 14:01 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: Also take: 1.  Person A has 99 hard-earned points, 1 point short of a win; 2.  Person B is mad at A, and illegally gets

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ on impossibility

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:  If so, it means that self-ratification is simply an admission that,  in spite of R1698, we are not in fact playing a nomic, but rather  playing a system where we can arbitrarily make any change by  unanimous consent

Re: DIS: but

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, ais523 wrote: Wasn't there a proto a while back to call them persimmons? It was meant as an anti-scam feature, but it might be more interesting as a basis for an economy. Probably we should start

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: lull

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: I think the only thing we can do now is to add time travel. Hell, a good set of time travel rules might well lead to me joining again.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attempted tortoise

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Hmm, that parsing doesn't quite work with how we usually read CFJs. If I ask if A then B then I am asking for a judgement on what B is in the case where A is true.  If it is impossible in our current universe/ ruleset

Re: DIS: let's shrink the ruleset...

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it... let's get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)! proto: adopt

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistrations

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: I intend, without objection, to deregister Teucer. Wait, I'm registered right now? Huh.

Re: DIS: Proto: The Citrine Repeals

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: What if the rules simply said that players must always be allowed to leave a contract? I'm sure that would break something, but what? Any attempt to use contracts to get people to commit to binding obligations -

Re: DIS: Proto: The Citrine Repeals

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: Right, so what if we just said that players must always be allowed to leave a contract unless the text of that contract is immutable. I don't think there are more than a small number of mutable

Re: DIS: Proto: The Citrine Repeals

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Craig Daniel wrote: That would lead to contracts containing the phrase SHALL consent, I suspect. Mutability would be a contract switch that could only be set with explicit consent from all parties. Question: how do you

Re: DIS: Proto: The Citrine Repeals

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Craig Daniel wrote: Do you really want some random foreign game that is using Agora for arbitration purposes to spam S-B with a hundred explicit consents every time it wants to tweak its rules? For that matter, do you really

Re: DIS: a depressing thought

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: It is, in fact, POSSIBLE to transfer Rests to the Lost and Found Department, by ceasing

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Ambassador] Foreign Relations

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Charles Walker

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scrolls of Agora

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Elliott Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/6/30 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:    Proposal 4432 by Maud, AI=1, Ordinary    Invisibilitating    Be it resolved, that the proposer of an adopted proposal (besides this    proposal) including

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I'm so Errational

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote: I change my name to 2.71828183... or e for short. I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person singular

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I'm so Errational

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Danielteu...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:

Re: [s-b] DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

therein with Bdi ta Askatasuna. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: Also, I mistakenly typed Bn support - not a defined term in any game, I don't believe - in the text of the contract where I meant Bn consent. I therefore intend, without objection from any

Re: [s-b] DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Benjamin Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: NttPF. It was to the B public forum, which is also where it was first created; if this didn't work from Agora's perspective, then I believe it was also not successfully created in the first place. I copied a-d

Re: [s-b] DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

2009/6/21 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: I'm not sure exactly what happened up there, but:  - I disfavor all CFJs initiated in the quoted text  - I decline all nominations made in the quoted text  - I object to all dependent actions intended in the quoted text  - I support then withdraw

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: Elliott Hird wrote: 2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: -- C-walker, who intends, without objection Having

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: The intent was for the same action (null string) both times. The ambiguity shouldn't invalidate the action any more than the ambiguity of attempting to transfer an unspecified one of several mutually-fungible

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pretty sure you can't get Agoran Consent in B, but in case this is a valid synonym for B's equivalent, I object there too.  By the way, B doesn't currently allow non-first-class judges; the Agora amendment

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:41 AM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: I object in Agora. I'm pretty sure you can't get Agoran Consent in B, but in case this is a valid synonym for B's equivalent, I object

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: I object.  Change the name plz. Would you, perhaps, prefer Bdi ta Asatasuna?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/6/16 Taral tar...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No consent was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/16 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com 2009/6/16 Taral tar...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all

DIS: Re: BUS: An action

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote: I agree to the mid central lax unrounded vowel contract. I believe there are still two, although your having quoted one likely causes it to be unambiguously the one you joined.

Re: DIS: Nickname changes need not be public, assuming that hasn't changed

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Jonatan Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/12 Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com: --Tom, who would like to go back to being called Warrigal Why don't you? Where's the fun in that?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/list.php?caller=Craig The server is taking too long to respond.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: Not bad at all.  Actually it's the INSANE proposals I remember the most... definitely added to the game in a good way.  -G. Oerjan proposed those. I'm pretty sure it was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: The server isn't CPU-intensive (load average = 0.05), but it does have to compete for bandwidth with the family's incoming videos and torrents, plus it hosts one 50 MB file that gets

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart luke.lockh...@gmail.com wrote: I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote: Can non-players get crim CFJs? What if players committed crimes prior to eir registration? If you were a second-class person, would its parties be liable? If it were, then Luke's message would have been ambiguous.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: You're not a player. I'm not? Shit, when did I get deregistered?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: We Should Have Done This Long Ago

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote: You at least heard of Agora before you joined it. I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while not a player and not barred from registering (either due to recent deregistration or

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: You're not a player. I'm not? Shit, when did I get

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: We Should Have Done This Long Ago

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote: (11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word Agora mean anything

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No idea

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Oh hey you're that Craig?  I remember your CFJs fondly.  -G. Huh. I don't remember them at all. But yes, I'm the same Craig. ...how bad were they?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: We Should Have Done This Long Ago

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: Gratuitous: This would have been more interesting after my proposal was passed. As it is, the CFJs are almost certainly all FALSE. Gratuitous: this isn't the point. The goal is not to find out if they

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: We Should Have Done This Long Ago

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:  Gratuitous: In a language I developed secretly, the noun denoting a player of a game is formed from the name of that game by deleting its third letter and putting it in all-caps.  So an AGRA is a player of Agora,

Re: DIS: Einos

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: http://einos-nomic.blogspot.com/ Einos has had a move activition, and now has a restriction on when protective decrees take effect. It's pretty clear it's just to get some kind of reaction, but the only thing

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Grabbing a dictatorship loophole, I'll explain later

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: ehird wrote: 2009/3/28 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk: I cause rule 2214 to amend itself by replacing its text with Indy CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement., using the authority from Open It Up. --

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brian's DiploNomic Report

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote: Any Player can send a public message to Agora with support and without 2 objections

DIS: A new potential protectorate for you!

Agorans, I recently started (and mentioned on the IRC channel) a sort of revived The Curvature of the Earth is Overwhelmed by Local Noise Nomic, entitled The Earth is Nonetheless an Oblate Spheroid Nomic; it may be found at http://einos-nomic.blogspot.com/ The Earth is Nonetheless an Oblate