RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: erratum I688 handling disabled for AM335x

2015-10-13 Thread Woodruff, Richard
> From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de] > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 5:01 AM > So please help me to get this straight: > > Errata I688 only affects OMAP4 which is consequently the only user of > omap_interconnect_sync() in it's WFI enter sequence, which in turn is > the only

RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: erratum I688 handling disabled for AM335x

2015-10-13 Thread Woodruff, Richard
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:24 AM > If you implement drivers using nothing but writel() and readl(), then your > performance _will_ suck, but that's entirely the driver's fault. Your above analysis seems correct. Perhaps

RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: erratum I688 handling disabled for AM335x

2015-09-29 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hello Robert, > From: Robert Schwebel [mailto:r.schwe...@pengutronix.de] > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:50 PM > > -1- > > Barrier side effects of the patch may be beneficial for other reasons. But > AM335x should be immune from this particular issue. > > Is this a matter of fact, or

RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: erratum I688 handling disabled for AM335x

2015-09-25 Thread Woodruff, Richard
> From: Menon, Nishanth > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:44 AM > > If I688 is not needed on am335x, then it seems there are still some > > mysteries remaining with this erratum to unravel. Something like > > difference in the L3 implementation. Maybe somebody from TI can > > investigate which

RE: mysterious crashes on OMAP5 uevm

2015-09-11 Thread Woodruff, Richard
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 9:03 AM > To: Grazvydas Ignotas > However, even the idea that it's ARMv7 or later is wrong. According to > the ARM ARM, the IT

RE: mysterious crashes on OMAP5 uevm

2015-09-11 Thread Woodruff, Richard
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 12:49 PM > Frankly, Richard, you're getting on my nerves in this thread - you seem to > know all about this problem, yet you never reported the problem upstream, > so people are effectively having

RE: mysterious crashes on OMAP5 uevm

2015-09-10 Thread Woodruff, Richard
> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel- > boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux > > There are 2 workarounds that I know which make the problem go > > away (one is enough): > > - recompile Xorg with -marm (I'm using Debian armhf so it's > >

RE: [PATCH 3/4] Revert ARM: OMAP4: remove dead kconfig option OMAP4_ERRATA_I688

2015-07-22 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel- boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Russell King Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 12:47 PM This reverts commit 606da4826b89b044b51e3a84958b802204cfe4c7. We actually need this code for proper behaviour of OMAP4, and it needs fixing a

RE: Test: OMAP5432-EVM support?

2013-10-29 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev- boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of wireless Since Linaro is flapping loudly about Grub2, I should think that support for the modern file systems on the 64 Bit arm offerings would abound, such as ZFS, CEPH, GlusterFS, etc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] am33xx: add CONFIG_SYS_NAND_DEVICE_WIDTH to determine NAND device bus-width

2013-09-25 Thread Woodruff, Richard
...@denx.de; nota...@gmail.com; luca.ceres...@comelit.it; Woodruff, Richard; we...@corscience.de; peter.bar...@logicpd.com; frede...@kriewitz.eu; tom@windriver.com; Menon, Nishanth; srin...@mistralsolutions.com; Hiremath, Vaibhav; Gupta, Pekon Subject: [PATCH 1/1] am33xx: add

RE: usage of sparse or other trick for improved type safety

2012-06-12 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi Tony, From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:t...@atomide.com] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:53 AM Thanks for quick input. Apologies on slow ack of it. Before we had these frameworks in place it was often hard to debug when something did not work for some omaps. Things would just not work or would

usage of sparse or other trick for improved type safety

2012-05-24 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi Tony, I am hoping to solicit an opinion from you for OMAP frameworks in general. In some recent review there was some debate about how it was good practice to form parameters in a way which didn't get misused. Nishanth was having some experience where end users doing custom ports made some

RE: [PATCH V3 00/10] PM: Create the AVS(Adaptive Voltage Scaling)

2012-05-08 Thread Woodruff, Richard
The only thing the higher-level layers might potentially need to do is to enable/disable AVS around transitions (e.g. when changing OPP, AVS is disabled before changing OPP and only re-enabled when the new nominal voltage has been acheived.) Getting clean baseline in place is

RE: [linux-pm] [PATCH V3 00/10] PM: Create the AVS(Adaptive Voltage Scaling)

2012-05-08 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Hilman, Kevin Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:17 PM A basic OMAP AVS driver has been in mainline for a long time, yet we have not seen support submitted for all of these features. 1.5/3.5 is a feature. ABB is requirement for a production useable driver. Higher speed rated OMAP4 and all

RE: PM related performance degradation on OMAP3

2012-04-12 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Grazvydas Ignotas Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 7:30 PM What I think is going on here is that omap_sram_idle() is taking too much time because it's overhead is too large. I've added a counter

RE: patch tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA added to tty tree

2012-02-06 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: NeilBrown [mailto:ne...@suse.de] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:31 PM So... if flow control is available, then when we idle the uart we should set snip ... Yes I think you can improve situation with such tricks. Unfortunately there are a few types of low-power idle wakeups which

RE: patch tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA added to tty tree

2012-02-06 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: NeilBrown [mailto:ne...@suse.de] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 5:58 PM To: Woodruff, Richard Apologies for mangled mails... I am years over due ditching current method. I don't think it is really OK to drop chars on the UART-to-Debug console. However it is OK to drop the BAUD rate

RE: patch tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA added to tty tree

2012-02-05 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 10:40 AM It is entirely unacceptable to drop characters on a serial port through the use of PM. Many serial protocols just will not cope

RE: patch tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA added to tty tree

2012-02-05 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:03 AM To: Woodruff, Richard On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 03:37:21PM +, Woodruff, Richard wrote: [x] What is acceptable depends is not black and white. Is there some QOS mapping which can

RE: patch tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA added to tty tree

2012-02-03 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of NeilBrown Not sure if it's the same problem but with 3530 on 3.2 with sleep_timeout set, I usually get first char dropped (as expected) but sometimes I get corrupted char instead too. Corrupt

RE: patch tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA added to tty tree

2012-02-03 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:00 PM One irritation was some internal interrupt sources were not linked to low power wakeup events. If you were in interrupt mode and got characters below watermark you could sleep before interrupt status

RE: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4: cache fixes for 4460

2011-11-28 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Mans Rullgard [mailto:mans.rullg...@linaro.org] Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 6:26 PM Hi, By the way, do you know whether it is safe to use SCU Speculative linefills with Cortex-A9 r2pX and PL310 r3pX?  http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0407f/BABEBFBH.html

RE: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4: cache fixes for 4460

2011-11-27 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev- boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Mans Rullgard Do you have an erratum number for this? This was very recent BUG and not yet made it to the public errata numbers. Most likely next PL310 errata update should have this

RE: [PATCH 13/25] OMAP4: PM: Add WakeupGen module as OMAP gic_arch_extn

2011-09-15 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Shilimkar, Santosh Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 7:02 AM You missed my point in the description. Clockdomain inactive doesn't depend on idle or WFI execution. Under HW supervison CPU clock domain can get into inactive when CPU is stalled and waiting for a read response from

RE: [PATCH] ARM: do not mark CPU 0 as hotpluggable

2011-07-22 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm- kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh With fixed IRQ migration and forcing CPU0 into an infinite WFI loop, I can offline CPU0 and still have a running system. The secure software runs

RE: [PATCH] ARM: do not mark CPU 0 as hotpluggable

2011-07-21 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm- kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:32:25PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: A quick poll of the ARM platforms that implement CPU Hotplug support shows that

RE: Android libjpeg

2011-06-24 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev- boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Christian Robottom Reis Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:30 PM This suggests to me that a simple drop-in of libjpeg-turbo might be actually easy to do, and that there is probably a

RE: State of LDP3430 platform

2011-02-23 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:t...@atomide.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:50 PM Anybody from TI looking into these? I'll poke some folks and check. I've not booted my LDP for a while. As an older 3430 dev board its lost its shine compared to 3630 and 4430 dev boards. Regards,

RE: State of LDP3430 platform

2011-01-17 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:t...@atomide.com] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 11:35 AM This happened for a few days both with 2.6.37 and current mainline kernel. After I started debugging it went away with no changes to anything.. So can't debug any further at this point unfortunately. Odd.

RE: State of LDP3430 platform

2011-01-15 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:t...@atomide.com] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 6:03 PM I've been seeing this on my omap4 panda. While debugging it, I left u-boot console only running for a few minutes to see if that stays up. It did.. And after doing that somehow now my panda boots all the

RE: State of LDP3430 platform

2011-01-15 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 5:38 PM Why does OMAP initialize its clock sources soo late, outside of the timer initialization? This means you have no counter in place (except for the jiffies counter) during early boot. Is

[Discuss] The first alpha release for PowerTOP 2.0

2011-01-03 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Per blog request http://blog.fenrus.org/?p=80: Try it, play with it and let me know what you think of it does it work or does it crash? I just gave build a quick try on a Fedora13 system. -1- The build environment stumbled on NL2FOUND test. The naming convention of libnl-x is not

RE: [PATCH v6 07/10] OMAP3: PM: Adding T2 enabling of smartreflex support

2011-01-02 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Gopinath, Thara Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 2:02 AM Is this true for OMAP2 as well? OMAP2 used VSEL for direct and VMODE for voltage control not SR path methods. I don't recall OMAP2 ever

RE: userspace access to cache geometry information

2010-10-15 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev- boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Peter Maydell One of the Valgrind subtools is Cachegrind; this is a cache profiler. (It simulates the I1, D1 and L2 caches so it can pinpoint the sources of cache misses in application code.)

RE: [PATCH] omap3: Prevent SDRC deadlock when L3 is changing frequency

2010-09-16 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:15 PM This patch fixes this problem by ensuring the branch prediction logic is disabled while changing the L3 clock frequency. The branch

RE: [PATCH] omap3: Prevent SDRC deadlock when L3 is changing frequency

2010-09-16 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:50 PM Sounds fair. But it might be worth checking that you guys have a system in place for collecting omap specific fixes and promptly merging

RE: [PATCH V3 2/2]OMAP: Disable internal I2C pull-ups in OMAP3630

2010-06-08 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 5:05 AM Sorry for the delay, here's some more info on this issue. So it looks like starting with 3630 there are dedicated pull-up for all the I2C buses.

RE: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)

2010-05-13 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Greg KH Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:47 PM Also note that such a driver, without wakelocks, would never get tested, and so, things start quickly diverging. Do wakelock enabled drivers require a

RE: [RFC] ETM/JTAG components states across OFF modes

2010-05-03 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi Alex, From: virtu...@slind.org [mailto:virtu...@slind.org] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 12:38 PM Do you have a web viewable git tree where your full patch is applied? Or could you send me on the side files? Main bit I was looking to check was that you have bug fix which came late in my

RE: [PATCH 1/2] omap: pm34xx: Enable IO / IO-CHAIN wakeups for PER

2010-04-22 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman I'm a little puzzled on this one. My understanding is that the IO pad is only armed when CORE is in RET or OFF. For ES3 and before the io ring wake was 'armed' when ever core went to

RE: [PATCH 0/5] V7/Cortex/omap34xx fixes for 2.6.33-rc1: DCC, kexec, atags

2010-01-08 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:54 AM Also, what's the Cortex version on your v7? It's rev r2p3 on omap3430. Just a quick note - I think it is r1p3 on OMAP34xx ES3.1 and

RE: [PATCH 2/2 v2] OMAP3:clk - introduce DPLL4 jtype support

2009-10-31 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: ext-ari.kau...@nokia.com [mailto:ext-ari.kau...@nokia.com] Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 4:40 AM @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ struct dpll_data { void __iomem*idlest_reg; u32 autoidle_mask; u32 freqsel_mask; + u32

RE: [PATCH 2/2 v2] OMAP3:clk - introduce DPLL4 jtype support

2009-10-31 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi Paul, From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:39 PM +static void lookup_dco_sddiv(struct clk *clk, u8 *dco, u8 *sd_div, u16 m, u8 n) +{ + unsigned long fint, clkinp, sd; /* watch out for overflow */ + int mod1, mod2; + + n++; /*

RE: [PATCH] OMAP3: DVFS: No sdrc AC timing changes during core dvfs

2009-10-22 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi Beonit, From: Cousson, Benoit Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:59 AM To: Woodruff, Richard; Paul Walmsley; Nayak, Rajendra It is not guaranteed safe to write actim registers on the fly to an active part. It is safe to do RFR as it is buffered and sent out at a safe time. I think

RE: [PATCH 01/17] PM: fix suspend control for IVA2

2009-10-22 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 5:24 AM IVA2 controls its target power state individually, thus suspend should not touch IVA2. Without this patch DSP suspend always fails. We

RE: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3:clk: introduce DPLL4 jtype support

2009-10-20 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 9:16 AM + * lookup_dco_sddiv -j-type DPLL4 compensation variables Put a space before the j-type, and add better description. Doesn't clarify what it really does IMHO: Something like: * lookup_dco_sddiv - Set j-type

RE: [PATCH] OMAP3: DVFS: No sdrc AC timing changes during core dvfs

2009-10-20 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 8:21 PM This patch removes the SDRC AC timings changes done during core dvfs. Updating AC timing CTRL values for SDRC during DVFS is seen to be a

RE: MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430

2009-10-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 9:52 AM To: Woodruff, Richard Do you have any idea about MMCHS_HCTL.IBG? Not off the top of my head. I was working with someone who hit issues so I did a quick spec read and came up with previous list

RE: [PATCH 12/17] OMAP2/3: Do not enable AUTOIDLE in interrupt controller

2009-10-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of tero.kri...@nokia.com Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 5:19 AM Is there errata number available for this issue by the way? I could attach this to the patch. No. I expect in the next few weeks it

RE: OMAP2420-HS flashing question

2009-10-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Andrejs Cainikovs Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 12:33 PM I've googled that OMAP HS are checking some kind of signature (applications should be signed with the special tool (OST Tools)) so the

RE: [PATCH] omap: 3630: update is_chip variable

2009-10-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Pandita, Vikram Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 4:58 PM diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat- omap/include/mach/cpu.h index 7cb0556..05a0a33 100644 ---

RE: MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430

2009-10-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: John Rigby [mailto:jcri...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 8:13 PM It is not perfect yet, I am still polling in sdio_irq.c because sometimes the card irq does get dropped. I suspect that is why the davinci driver had extra checks and calls in various places. Maybe. Do

RE: MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430

2009-10-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: John Rigby [mailto:jcri...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 8:13 PM It is not perfect yet, I am still polling in sdio_irq.c because sometimes the card irq does get dropped. I suspect that is why the davinci driver had extra checks and calls in various places. Maybe. Do

RE: [PATCH 12/17] OMAP2/3: Do not enable AUTOIDLE in interrupt controller

2009-10-16 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tero Kristo Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:49 AM OMAP interrupt controller goes to unknown state when there is right combination of l3,l4 sleep/wake-up transitions, l4 autoidle in interrupt

RE: [PATCH 12/17] OMAP2/3: Do not enable AUTOIDLE in interrupt controller

2009-10-16 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Ghongdemath, Girish Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:48 PM On one of the custom board the power measured didn't show any major impact, with just one time disabling of INTC-AUTOIDL. However, optimizing this WA looks good though. I did give it a try, Disabling/enabling INTC autoidle

RE: [PATCH RESEND] I2C: OMAP: Add missing wakeup events

2009-10-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
/* I2C WE wakeup enable register */ -#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 14) /* TX drain wakup */ +#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 14) /* TX drain wakeup */ #define OMAP_I2C_WE_RDR_WE (1 13) /* RX drain wakeup */ +#define OMAP_I2C_WE_ROVR_WE (1 11)

RE: [PATCH RESEND] I2C: OMAP: Add missing wakeup events

2009-10-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
/* I2C WE wakeup enable register */ -#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 14) /* TX drain wakup */ +#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 14) /* TX drain wakeup */ #define OMAP_I2C_WE_RDR_WE (1 13) /* RX drain wakeup */ +#define OMAP_I2C_WE_ROVR_WE (1 11)

RE: RE: Memory performance / Cache problem

2009-10-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
There is no newer u-boot from TI available. There is a SDK 02.01.03.11 but it contains the same uboot 2008.10 with the only addition of the second generation of EVM boards with another network chip. So I checked the uboot from git, but this doesn't support Microns NAND Flash anymore. It is

RE: RE: RE: Memory performance / Cache problem

2009-10-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: e...@gmx.de [mailto:e...@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:49 AM To: Woodruff, Richard; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Premi, Sanjeev Subject: Re: RE: RE: Memory performance / Cache problem Mem clock is both times 166MHz. I don't know whether are differences in cycle access

RE: RE: RE: RE: Memory performance / Cache problem

2009-10-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: e...@gmx.de [mailto:e...@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:23 PM To: Woodruff, Richard; Premi, Sanjeev; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Memory performance / Cache problem Yes aligned buffers can make a difference. But probably more so for small

RE: Memory performance / Cache problem

2009-10-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Siarhei Siamashka [mailto:siarhei.siamas...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:37 PM To: ext e...@gmx.de What you see is just a (fake) performance boost because you have a single physical page shared between all the virtual pages in the source buffer. So you get no cache

RE: Discussion: OMAP: PM: opp table handling

2009-10-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:12 AM I think we should as well change the naming and use the less confusing naming we are using on OMAP3630/4430. OPPs are now named using

RE: [PATCH 1/1] OMAP: I2C: Add mpu wake up latency constraint in i2c

2009-10-07 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kalle Jokiniemi Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 5:59 AM Yes, this is a good idea in theory, but the reality of wake-up latencies kind-a kill this one. Wake-up from even C1 (MPU INA, CORE ON) takes

RE: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP3: PM: Adding OSWR support

2009-09-02 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hunter, Jon Not to split hairs, but the OMAP3430 Technical Reference Manual states that OSwR means Open Switch Retention. So no with. This W always bother me too! No bother with W, its part of

RE: Pull request for OMAP PM, clock, SDRC 2.6.32 patches

2009-08-18 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi Paul, -Original Message- From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:36 AM To: Russell King - ARM Linux I'm afraid to say that I think you've left it far too late to send this. I

RE: Pull request for OMAP PM, clock, SDRC 2.6.32 patches

2009-08-18 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:27 PM To: Woodruff, Richard The series cannot conflict with Rajendra's patches 1-3, since there are no files in common between the two series. As for patches 4-6, there are comments pending: OK, there are recent

RE: [beagleboard] Re: USB EHCI problems

2009-08-15 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Siarhei Siamashka Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 3:04 PM On Saturday 15 August 2009, Frantisek Dufka wrote: Gerald Coley wrote: You need to enable Smart Reflex on VDD2 in the Kernel. I can't

RE: [PATCHv3 14/20] OMAP: McBSP: Let element DMA mode hit retention also

2009-08-13 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Valentin The device no longer hits retention if element DMA mode is taken for at least the duration of the serial console timeout. Force element DMA mode to shut down through smartidle.

RE: Exception while handling MEM Hole on OMAP3 / ARM Cortex A8

2009-08-07 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Used to be you needed to build with CONFIG_ARCH_DISCONTIGMEM_ENABLE did you do this? Regards, Richard W. -Original Message- From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Syed Mohammed, Khasim Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 3:17 PM To:

RE: [PATCH v2] OMAP3: PM: USBHOST: clear wakeup events on both hosts

2009-07-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Pandita, Vikram Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 7:33 PM USBHOST module has 2 fclocks (for HOST1 and HOST2), only one iclock and only a single bit in the WKST register to indicate a wakeup event.

RE: [PATCH v2] OMAP3: PM: USBHOST: clear wakeup events on both hosts

2009-07-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
So point is... for USB having this WKST status bit set and NOT having the F- Clk enabled points to an issue in the OFF mode transition code in the USB driver. Or if this is on 1st boot, then issue can be init code needing to clean up whatever damage the boot loader may have done. Prcm_init

linux symposium

2009-07-15 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi, If there are any omap people at linux symposium this year feel free to drop me a note. I've ran into a few OMAP3 users already. Regards, Richard W. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM Cortex8 Rename and move v7_flush_dcache_all to flush_dcache

2009-07-06 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Tom Rix Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:48 AM Since there is only one version of flushing the dcache for arm_cortex8, rename v7_flush_dcache_all to the the generic name flush_dcache. Because the function

RE: [PATCH 01/04] OMAP3: PM: Disable PER DPLL idle before OFF, reduces OFF latency by 20ms

2009-07-01 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:19 AM David, did you see stability problems when using this patch on top of linux-omap PM branch? Or did you see problems on some internal tree? Issue was on one internal tree. Tests need to be

RE: [PATCH -pm 1/2] SDRC: check for stuck DLL state machine and kick

2009-06-26 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi Paul, On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote: From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:05 PM Looks like the significant difference is the use of CLKCTRL = 0x2 (+ AUTOCOUNT). Maybe there is some SDRC bug related to CLKCTRL = 0x2

RE: Reclaim address space on omaps, Tony on vacation in July

2009-06-26 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren Last week I posted some more omap io.h clean-up patches to the linux-omap list [1], and started looking at what it would take to reclaim lost address space on top of the

RE: [PATCH v2] OMAP3: PM: reset USB OTG module on boot

2009-06-24 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman Why is this sys-config reset done only for omap34xx() This should be valid for any old 24xx() as well as new 44xx() omaps You're correct. Good catch. The force-idle fix that

RE: OMAP3 PM: off-mode during idle, problem with UART1 console

2009-06-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
-Original Message- From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 11:21 AM Thanks a lot for testing. It sounds like something specific to the ES3.0 GP SDP. Are DIP switches the same? ROM code may touch UART in one case and not the other.

RE: [PATCH -pm 1/2] SDRC: check for stuck DLL state machine and kick

2009-06-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:07 PM Hi Paul, On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote: I've only seen the condition along side of very aggressive SDRC_POWER settings. Could you send over the SDRC_POWER settings that cause this problem

RE: [PATCH -pm 1/2] SDRC: check for stuck DLL state machine and kick

2009-06-18 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Mike, From: Mike Chan [mailto:m...@android.com] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:42 PM +/* Kick DLL state machine if lock not started */ +kick_dll: + ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl /* get dlla addr */ + ldr r5, [r4]/* grab value */ + mov r6, r5

RE: [PATCH -pm 1/2] SDRC: check for stuck DLL state machine and kick

2009-06-18 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:03 AM I've seen this issue on a couple custom boards. In these instances I've not had access to boot loaders. I would expect this issue would show up in the wild in some devices. It might be ok to

RE: [PATCH -pm 1/2] SDRC: check for stuck DLL state machine and kick

2009-06-18 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Hi, From: Wang Sawsd-A24013 [mailto:cqw...@motorola.com] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:27 PM + str r6, [r4]/* restore old value */ Richard, I think here it should be: str r5, [r4], not r6. I modifed this when I was verifying your patch. You are correct that was

RE: OMAP3 PM: off-mode during idle, problem with UART1 console

2009-06-17 Thread Woodruff, Richard
core vs per Did you hook up your emulator and connect during awake time of uart timer? It should really tell a lot. Regards, Richard W. -Original Message- From: Nayak, Rajendra Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:12 AM To: Kevin Hilman; Woodruff, Richard Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

RE: [PATCH 05/06] OMAP3: PM: Implement locking for any scratchpad access

2009-06-05 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 4:26 PM On Thu, 28 May 2009, Rajendra Nayak wrote: This patch implements locking using the semaphore in scratchpad memory preventing any concurrent

RE: LDP support

2009-06-01 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 2:45 AM On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 07:24:19PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote: 6. do ___NOT___ (underscored in triplicate and 500ft high letters

RE: LDP support

2009-06-01 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 2:45 AM That's something that TI may know, but it's almost impossible for developers to know because: BTW, yes, the forest of TRMs for OMAP3

RE: LDP support

2009-05-31 Thread Woodruff, Richard
6. do ___NOT___ (underscored in triplicate and 500ft high letters) enable ARM errata 460075 - it solidly prevents the kernel booting on LDP. (it's taken many hours to debug that.) This is an r2p0 errata only. It's not in earlier versions or in later cores. Today there are only r1pX

RE: [PATCH 0/2] PM: drop clocks_off_while_idle

2009-05-19 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Kevin, From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman echo 0 /sys/power/clocks_off_while_idle Kevin Hilman (2): For PM branch are you keeping any kind of running readme file for inclusion in Documentation directory? It

RE: [PATCH] usb: disable OTG AUTOIDLE only with omap3430

2009-05-18 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Niilo Minkkinen Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:54 AM Omap3 MUSB AUTOIDLE functionality configured through OTG_SYSCONFIG register prevents the device from going into retention. This is a workaround

RE: [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2/3: PM: push core PM code from linux-omap

2009-05-18 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:25 PM The call to the enter method essentially calls the core specific suspend function (eg, pxa25x_cpu_suspend()), which is an assembly function which ultimately ends up powering down the core

RE: [PATCH] PM: Disable usb host HW save and restore

2009-05-15 Thread Woodruff, Richard
couple errata impacting different chip revs. Today in the older TI reference code this condition of a stuck on power domain does not happen. However, we are using a software supervised method to disable the power domain. May be this code has a bug or the hardware does around auto

RE: [PATCH] PM: Disable usb host HW save and restore

2009-05-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 12:10 PM To: Kalle Jokiniemi Kalle Jokiniemi kalle.jokini...@digia.com writes: The hardware SAVEANDRESTORE mechanism seems to leave USB HOST power domain permanently into active state after one

RE: [PATCH 0/2] PM: OMAP3 SDRC: fix some SDRAM settings for Qimonda parts

2009-05-14 Thread Woodruff, Richard
Also when reviewing the timing calculations, it appears that the lowest speed setting had an error in its autorefresh counter value. I don't know if anything out there still uses this low-speed setting - my recollection is that it was added for some early Labrador boards that had speed

RE: [PATCH 0/2] I2C: OMAP: spurious IRQ fixes

2009-05-12 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley A brief update for anyone following along on the list: Aaro sent me a test-case. It seems that the receive overruns only affect PM kernels. They are caused by the MPU going to

RE: PM: 4 Problems in OMAP3430 DVFS (SmartReflex, Cpufreq)

2009-04-23 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:53 AM To: Woodruff, Richard 4. Current PM code didn't enable the maximum clock (i.e. CPU: 600Mhz) according to the comment as below: /* Avoid registering the 120% Overdrive with CPUFreq */ prcm

RE: 4 Problems in OMAP3430 DVFS (SmartReflex, Cpufreq)

2009-04-23 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kim Kyuwon Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:00 AM 3. OP(Operating Point) transition time is set to 10seconds in cpu-omap.c as follows: The default sampling rate of CPUFreq is set to

RE: 2.6.29 and SDP3430 now 2.6.30-rc2, q3-2007 compiler error

2009-04-21 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: Shilimkar, Santosh Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 11:39 PM Thanks Richard for root casing the issue. Yes I also did observed this. Second time when framework calls omap2_gp_timer_set_mode set the periodic mode, R0 contains 0 (CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED) instead of

RE: 2.6.29 and SDP3430

2009-04-09 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jarkko Nikula Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:04 AM just messing around with tony's master branch on SDP3430, just did a defconfig and a build with 2007q3-51 codesourcery compiler, I see it

RE: 2.6.29 and SDP3430

2009-04-09 Thread Woodruff, Richard
I wonder if the timer stopped ticking. If you connect with emulator take a look at GPT1 registers and see if time base is moving. Another quick test is to shut off tickles, nohz=off. nohz=off did not work with either 2007q3 or 2008q3.. have'nt looked at the GPT regs though.. Hmm,

RE: omap_wdt: modprobe fails

2009-04-07 Thread Woodruff, Richard
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Roger Quadros Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:11 AM modprobe omap_wdt fails in omap PM branch. below is the trace log. any idea why? i wonder weather fails in master too. Looks like it. I

  1   2   3   >