To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
This issue depends on issue 71993, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
This issue depends on issue 71993, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
This issue depends on issue 71993, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 21:11:46 +
2007 ---
pjanik: I don't care at all how this gets fixed. If a new upstream version of
the t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 21:11:38 +
2007 ---
pjanik: I don't care at all how this gets fixed. If a new upstream version of
the t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 18:44:16 +
2007 ---
Please discuss with rene how you want/will/should proceed.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 17:59:10 +
2007 ---
OK, sorry for any confusion I introduced. It's just the fact that I receive so
many
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 17:49:38 +
2007 ---
milek_pl: it is very simple. Because we are talking about stable version...
Your s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 17:39:05 +
2007 ---
pjanik -> I thought that after releasing under OSL 2.0, you cannot re-license,
but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 17:21:54 +
2007 ---
Sorry, but according to the README file in plthes, YOU are the copyright owner.
YO
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 7 17:03:33 +
2007 ---
How could the CWS plthes be approved if this issues is not verified?
How could the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 4 20:13:07 +
2007 ---
rene -> done, URL is the same as before.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 4 09:18:44 +
2007 ---
The URL is:
http://pl.openoffice.org/pliki/thes_pl_PL_v2.zip
I would be really gra
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 4 09:00:35 +
2007 ---
milek_pl: ok, have an exact URL to the fixed version? Then I'd do the cws and
commi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 21:22:04 +
2007 ---
Oh, my, I thought I was fixing the hyphenation bug, sorry.
Anyway, the files that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 04:20:17 -0800
2007 ---
mh: you are right as with the headers and the files. But that's what is common
prat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 03:52:51 -0800
2007 ---
I don't think that it is inpractable to make the reader (and potenial authors of
de
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 03:19:59 -0800
2007 ---
mh: (ok, my installset example was bad)
this does not help (nnot that it would help
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 02:45:38 -0800
2007 ---
>> set to accepted to make sure that the OpenOffice.org project complies with
>> a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 17:29:09 -0800
2007 ---
> set to accepted to make sure that the OpenOffice.org project complies with all
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 08:25:35 -0800
2007 ---
and note that the *official* Open Source Definition *by OSI*
(http://www.opensource
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 08:23:37 -0800
2007 ---
mh:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/04/msg00079.html + Thread.
e.g.
ht
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 08:19:49 -0800
2007 ---
DOH!
I forgot the link. If you had just told me that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 07:37:03 -0800
2007 ---
mh: Blindly trusting everything OSI did/does is bad. OSI did many errors in
accepti
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 07:29:43 -0800
2007 ---
I understand this only partly. Yes, we need to include a note into
THIRDPARTYLICENS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
Issue #|73618
Summary|pl_PL Thesaurus is non-free
Component|utilities
Version|680m199
Platform|Al
42 matches
Mail list logo