Re: Linux setup problems

2001-02-06 Thread Roland E. Lipovits
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just seting up my first Linux (Debian Potato) box in a while. (...) ERROR: debian: [can not read/write /etc/dumpdates: No such file or directory] /etc/dumpdates doesn't exist on a Debian installation, it's /var/lib/dumpdates. Maybe a symlink will work,

Re: Linux (Debian) and large files?

2001-02-06 Thread Josep Llauradó Selvas
The 2.2.x kernels don't support by default files larger than 2Gb, but you can apply a patch called 'LFS' or you can download the lattest kernel from the 2.4.x series, that includes the patch into the kernel. The Debian 2.4.x kernels can be found at www.valinux.com... At:

Request to nachine timed out.

2001-02-06 Thread tom
Hi all I've got the problem with this: FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: machinesda2 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.] machinesdc1 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.] It's a linux machine where sda2 is / directory and sdc1 is raid. On the sda2 is only system, so

It's Impossible!! Is the tape full?

2001-02-06 Thread Adolfo Pachón
Hi all My system is an amanda2.4.2pl with an HP COLORADO 4/8 GB IDE (working with ide-scsi module). The backups are daily, with only one tape, for the moment. The daily amount data average of entire backup is 400 MB. I'm doing copies for the linux server and the windows clients, via Samba. I use

Re: Linux setup problems

2001-02-06 Thread Chris Karakas
Stan Brown wrote: ERROR: debian: [can not access /dev/hdc1 (hdc1): Permission denied] ERROR: debian: [can not access /dev/hda1 (hda1): Permission denied] ERROR: debian: [can not access /dev/hda3 (hda3): Permission denied] ... brw-rw1 root disk 3, 1 Nov 30 10:22

Re: It's Impossible!! Is the tape full?

2001-02-06 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, i think you expect amanda to put backups of multiple days on one tape, do you? if this is true you are completley wrong. Amanda needs one tape for every day's backup, no matter how many data you backup. (at least if you don`t patch it to append to tapes, there is a patch for doing that

Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-06 Thread Adolfo Pachón
Christoph Scheeder has told me that I can't use only one tape for backing up all the days of the week. Can anybody suggest me a solution? By the moment, I cant pay more tapes. Thanks

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-06 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Adolfo Pachn [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:07:35PM +0100) Christoph Scheeder has told me that I can't use only one tape for backing up all the days of the week. Can anybody suggest me a solution? By the moment, I cant pay more tapes. if you're data is important enough to back

Re: It's Impossible!! Is the tape full?

2001-02-06 Thread Chris Karakas
Adolfo Pachn wrote: planner: Last full dump of server:/home on tape Diaria-000 overwritten on this run. planner: Last full dump of server://javierpuech/Documentos on tape Diaria-000 overwritten on this run. This tells you that you have two full dumps on this tape and they are the

No Subject

2001-02-06 Thread Don Broderick
unsubscribe amanda-users begin:vcard n:Broderick;Don tel;pager:(412)644-1708 tel;fax:(412)237-3091 tel;work:(412)237-3152 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Community College of Allegheny County;Information Technology Services adr:;;800 Allegheny Avenue;Pittsburgh;PA;15233;USA version:2.1

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-06 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Gerhard den Hollander wrote: if you're data is important enough to back it up, it's also important enough to buy a few more tapes. agreed, but... With 1 single tape, you have a single point of failure (that tape). No, not really. He'd have to lose both the disk

nocomp file system auto-upgrading to comp?

2001-02-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I have a file system that comes in at just over 15gig, that amanda is saying is to big for my 15/30 drive ... I have it set as a nocomp-user right now, since i want to use hardware comopression as much as possible over software ... is there any way of defining a 'type' that will do nocomp, but

Re: Request to nachine timed out.

2001-02-06 Thread tomas morhac
You are using gnutar. It's slow (es. an incremental with gzip compression) Make sure you have set your timeout to something large I have dtimeout set to 1800 . Also, did you check /tmp/amanda on the client for debug files (sendbackup.*.debug ) ? If so, what's in the last (timewise)

amlabel on FreeBSD ... (fwd)

2001-02-06 Thread The Hermit Hacker
has anyone looked into this? basically, as the amanda user, I can do a chio, but using amlable it fails? Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary:

Re: Linux (Debian) and large files?

2001-02-06 Thread Paul Lussier
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:30:36PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote: Hi, sorry to interupt,but debian does not use rpm packageformat. it has it own format called dpkg, so www.rpmfind.com is a bad idea... No, it's not necessarilly a bad idea. You can still use RPMs with Debian. Either by

Re: Request to nachine timed out.

2001-02-06 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* tomas morhac [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 04:30:00PM +0100) You are using gnutar. It's slow (es. an incremental with gzip compression) Make sure you have set your timeout to something large I have dtimeout set to 1800 . Also, did you check /tmp/amanda on the client

Linux dump's with comp user?

2001-02-06 Thread Frank Rippert
Another, but i hope the last question belongs to amanda. I use amanda for backup 2 Linux PC's (one as Server and Client, and one installed only as client). Then i have a NT Workstation PC. When i backup up files on all 3 PC's with dumptype comp-user-tar backup works fine. When i change the

Re: Request to nachine timed out.

2001-02-06 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:41:19AM +0100) Hi all I've got the problem with this: FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: machinesda2 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.] machinesdc1 lev 0 FAILED [Request to machine timed out.] It's a

Re: Linux (Debian) and large files?

2001-02-06 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, i know it is possible, i'm doing it for some packages, but you need to know very good what you are doing. For example i have seen alien messing up all permisions for the files in an rpm-package completly, making the resulting .dpkg completly unusable. And with rpm you loose all

switching from dump to tar

2001-02-06 Thread Olaf Seidel
Hi, I plan to switch from dump to tar, because with one out of six computers, dump doesn't work (I've given up to find out) and, because I've heard, that tar is more reliable on systems where the data is changing fast. So, I changed my entries in disklist from nocomp-root to root-tar and

Re: Linux setup problems

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
ERROR: debian: [can not read/write /etc/dumpdates: No such file or directory] /etc/dumpdates doesn't exist on a Debian installation, it's /var/lib/dumpdates. Sigh. Do you think Amanda should be checking if either exist rather than just the one name? Or should it try to figure out at

Re: Can I use only one tape for backing up all the week?

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
With 1 single tape, you have a single point of failure (that tape). No, not really. He'd have to lose both the disk and the tape in order to lose the data. Not that it can't happen, but it's not a single point of failure. Actually, all you'd have to lose is the one file you really, really

Re: FreeBSD, DLT 2000 and hardware compression ...

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
I have a DLT2000 (is that 5/10 or 15/30?) ... If I'm reading the www.quantum.com web page right, it's 10/20 if you use DLT-III tapes and 15/30 if you use DLT-III-XT. will it automatically use hardware compression under FreeBSD, or, like Solaris, do I have to use special devices for this? This

Re: nocomp file system auto-upgrading to comp?

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
I have a file system that comes in at just over 15gig, that amanda is saying is to big for my 15/30 drive ... What is your tapetype set to? Is Amanda saying this file system by itself is too big, or it in addition to the others in the run is too big? Any chance of increasing runtapes to 2 and

Re: Linux dump's with comp user?

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
... When i change the dumptype for the Linux PC's e.g. to comp-user i get the error messages /inst lev 0 FAILED [disk /inst offline on tux2?] What happens when you run amcheck (please post **all** the messages)? What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on the client? I read in the FAQ, that the

Re: switching from dump to tar

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
... Now amcheck complains that /etc/amandates and /usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/. are missing on all machines. Surely, I could generate it manually, but where did I do a mistake? ... You didn't make a mistake. These are expected to be created by hand. The Amanda user typically does not

Updating the Amanda chapter web pages

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
I've been given the "opportunity" :-) to update the Amanda chapter web pages at www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html, so now would be a good time for everyone to toss in their comments on what it should contain (keeping in mind that every minute I'm typing HTML is one I won't be typing Amanda code

Re: Updating the Amanda chapter web pages

2001-02-06 Thread Andrew Robinson
I don't know if this qualifies as an actual suggestion or not, but here goes. Don't lose the messages in the details. Perhaps start the chapter with a "Dummies" section on how to do a basic backup with Amanda and how to do a basic restore. Then dive off into the details of each part of the

lev 0 FAILED [no backup size line] only with no-record DEC Unix

2001-02-06 Thread Brian Leverson
I have compiiled and installed the latest Amanda 2.4.2p1 for an installation of DEC Unix 4.0b to 4.0d, HP-UX, Solaris, Irix, and NT (Samba) workstations. Amanda successfully backs up 70+ file systems from these platforms to the default 'DailySet1', with a dumpcycle of 4 weeks, runspercycle of 20,

Re: Amanda Client on FreeBSD

2001-02-06 Thread Ryan Williams
- Original Message - From: "John R. Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Ryan Williams" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "Shawn M. Green" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:06 AM Subject: Re: Amanda Client on FreeBSD Like I said not an expert, the first 4 times

Re: Potential problem ... ? file system too big for tape?

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
If i have a file system that is, when compressed, larger then my tape size, what happens? from what I read, it can't span a file system across two tapes, but I might be mis-remembering what I read ... You're not mis-remembering. Amanda cannot handle this yet. I have started on the project to

Potential problem ... ? file system too big for tape?

2001-02-06 Thread The Hermit Hacker
If i have a file system that is, when compressed, larger then my tape size, what happens? from what I read, it can't span a file system across two tapes, but I might be mis-remembering what I read ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems

Re: FreeBSD, DLT 2000 and hardware compression ...

2001-02-06 Thread John R. Jackson
which man page are you reading here? :) www.freebsd.org John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FreeBSD, DLT 2000 and hardware compression ...

2001-02-06 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, John R. Jackson wrote: which man page are you reading here? :) www.freebsd.org I think he meant man page for which command. (You overlooked saying in your last message.) I imagine you're looking at mt(1) which contains: comp Set compression mode. There are

Re: Updating the Amanda chapter web pages

2001-02-06 Thread Jeff Silverman
"John R. Jackson" wrote: I've been given the "opportunity" :-) to update the Amanda chapter web pages at www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html, so now would be a good time for everyone to toss in their comments on what it should contain (keeping in mind that every minute I'm typing HTML is one I

Re: Request to nachine timed out.

2001-02-06 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 6, 2001, tomas morhac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...and in the /tmp/amanda (client) is no sendbackup.debug How about sendsize.debug? That's the one that's created during estimation. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer

Re: amrestore simple question

2001-02-06 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 5, 2001, Tal Ovadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: amrestore /dev/nst0 machine.kuku.com /site | restore -i ^ add `-p' here -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD

Re: Updating the Amanda chapter web pages

2001-02-06 Thread Robert Cavey
After looking at quite a bit of the post to amanda-users it seems as though that a lot of people has trouble understanding which /dev/device to use for amanda. I know for me setting up a changer under RedHat 7.0 was a bit tough due to never having used scsi devices under Linux before. Maybe in

Re: lev 0 FAILED [no backup size line] only with no-record DEC Unix

2001-02-06 Thread Alexandre Oliva
This is definitely not about the development of Amanda, so I'm leaving amanda-hackers out. On Feb 6, 2001, Brian Leverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I find that the 'record no' option is causing failures for the DEC Unix 'ufs' dumps. What are the errors you get in the e-mail report?

Re: FreeBSD, DLT 2000 and hardware compression ...

2001-02-06 Thread Dan Wilder
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: Sorry, I haven't messed with this myself. I'm currently staring at the Linux docs trying to figure out if I have to use ioctl in order to turn h/w compression on and off there. Should be able to do it with mt(1). At least,

Amanda installation on a client

2001-02-06 Thread Juergen Knott
Hi! I had installed amanda on a tape server and there amanda is running fine. Now, I want to be install amanda on a client running under Kernel 2.2.17, so that the tape server can backup the client. I have decompressed the sources on the client and im not shure which options i need to

Re: Amanda installation on a client

2001-02-06 Thread Christopher Wargaski
Hi Juergen-- I had installed amanda on a tape server and there amanda is running fine. Now, I want to be install amanda on a client running under Kernel 2.2.17, so that the tape server can backup the client. I have decompressed the sources on the client and im not shure which options i need to