[AMaViS-user] Amavis not considering whitelist when processing bounce killer

procedure when a customer complains about not getting list email), but it's being ignored by the bounce killer. Thoughts? Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad

Re: [AMaViS-user] about amavis spamassassin spam scores

for default are very conservative, and there's no right number. Like Michael said, it's very much environment-dependant. Start with the defaults, look at how your mail gets scored, and adjust from there. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972

[AMaViS-user] preffered version of bdb?

, no problem, I can do that. But I have a lot of servers to upgrade; is bdb44 the preferred version? I see the ports have up to db48 and db50. Should I go to db48? Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972

Re: [AMaViS-user] Current p0f rules?

1 0/h0.0 % Is there something I'm missing? Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- -- ___ AMaViS-user

[AMaViS-user] severe performance degredation by amavisd 2.6.4 under load

hardware (running our older versions of all the software) can handle many more max_servers and messages per second. Does anybody have any idea what is going on here? I'm happy to try any suggested debugging. Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972

Re: [AMaViS-user] severe performance degredation by amavisd 2.6.4 under load

On Wed, 12 May 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote: On 5/12/10 11:44 AM, Andy Dills wrote: So, I'm trying to make a new build for our mailserver cluster, and I'm experiencing a strange problem. This is FreeBSD 8.0, Postfix 2.6.6, Amavisd 2.6.4, Perl 5.10.1, SA 3.3.1, Clamav 0.96, both

Re: [AMaViS-user] severe performance degredation by amavisd 2.6.4 under load

On Wed, 12 May 2010, Andy Dills wrote: amavisd-new-2.6.4_5,1 BTW, as a shot in the dark I built the 8.0-STABLE kernel with options DEADLKRES but that didn't help. I'm now in the process of building the kernel without SMP support to see how that behaves. It was the same behavior without

Re: [AMaViS-user] severe performance degredation by amavisd 2.6.4 under load

in the release notes or something? It definitely solved a huge problem that I've been chasing all day now. Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972

[AMaViS-user] Current p0f rules?

Hi there, Are the sample rules in the release notes still the preferred p0f ruleset for SA? Does anybody have any comments or experiences? We're in the process of upgrading amavisd-new, and want to take this opportunity to utilize this additional tool. Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet

Re: [AMaViS-user] performance questions

hammered. Yeah. It helps a lot once you switch to a distributed architecture (L4 switch frotend and NFS backend, for instance)...you can just throw more servers at it, which while not ideal, beats the hell out of mail delay. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972

Re: [AMaViS-user] Assistance with Razor in a chrooted environment

in the amavisd chroot doc). Fresh versions of FreeBSD + Postfix + Amavisd-new + Clamav + SA + Razor2/DCC/FuzzyOcr (and all associated libs) = Happy 2007 everybody!! Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972

[AMaViS-user] Assistance with Razor in a chrooted environment

into the chrooted hierarchy. Any ideas or debugging tips, or should I go bug the Razor crowd? Thanks! Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join

Re: [AMaViS-user] Assistance with Razor in a chrooted environment

:17.919508 check[63222]: [ 3] Unable to connect to discovery.spamnet.com:2703; Reason: Invalid argument. Thanks! Andy On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Andy Dills wrote: Hello everybody, it's been years since I've last posted to this list. We're in the progress of getting current with amavisd and all