Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2016-02-19 Thread Brian Nisbet
On 19/02/2016 09:50, Edward Shryane wrote: On 19 Feb 2016, at 10:46, Brian Nisbet wrote: Tim, On 14/01/2016 14:57, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Hi all, On 12 Jan 2016, at 15:23, Brian Nisbet wrote: Afternoon(-ish), As I'm pretty sure Monday is now everywhere in the world, I think that give

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2016-02-19 Thread Edward Shryane
> On 19 Feb 2016, at 10:46, Brian Nisbet wrote: > > Tim, > > On 14/01/2016 14:57, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> >>> On 12 Jan 2016, at 15:23, Brian Nisbet wrote: >>> >>> Afternoon(-ish), >>> >>> As I'm pretty sure Monday is now everywhere in the world, I think that >>> given

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2016-02-19 Thread Brian Nisbet
Tim, On 14/01/2016 14:57, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Hi all, On 12 Jan 2016, at 15:23, Brian Nisbet wrote: Afternoon(-ish), As I'm pretty sure Monday is now everywhere in the world, I think that given the lack of further responses or discussion or, importantly, disagreements with the genera

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2016-01-13 Thread denis
Hi Brian A little late, but I was on holiday :) I agree my comments are a separate issue and should not delay the process of adding any missing abuse-c attributes. I am about to write a separate email about how to use abuse-c as I think we are in danger of losing the plot regarding the origi

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-18 Thread William Sylvester
Tim, I support your proposal and applaud the efforts to improve this process and improve the overall data within the database. What if anything is being done to make sure that valid emails are being entered? I assume we are doing a check to make sure the email has an ‘@‘ and maybe even some va

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-17 Thread denis
Hi Tim On 17/12/2015 12:01, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Hi all, To clarify, we do not create duplicates or overrides. On 16 Dec 2015, at 16:54, denis wrote: Hi Tim On 16/12/2015 15:58, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Hi, To expedite the creation of abuse contacts we've just deployed an enhancement t

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-17 Thread Tim Bruijnzeels
Hi all, To clarify, we do not create duplicates or overrides. > On 16 Dec 2015, at 16:54, denis wrote: > > Hi Tim > > On 16/12/2015 15:58, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: >> Hi, >> > > To expedite the creation of abuse contacts we've just deployed > an enhancement to the RIPE Database web

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-16 Thread denis
Hi Tim On 16/12/2015 15:58, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Hi, To expedite the creation of abuse contacts we've just deployed an enhancement to the RIPE Database web interface. Whenever you create a new organisation object or you edit an existing one that does not have an abuse contact set, we will

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-16 Thread Tim Bruijnzeels
Hi, > On 16 Dec 2015, at 15:48, Piotr Strzyzewski > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 03:34:26PM +0100, denis wrote: > > Dear Denis, > >> On 16/12/2015 11:32, Alex Band wrote: >>> Hi Michele, >>> On 15 Dec 2015, at 21:28, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: Tim >>

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-16 Thread Piotr Strzyzewski
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 03:34:26PM +0100, denis wrote: Dear Denis, > On 16/12/2015 11:32, Alex Band wrote: >> Hi Michele, >> >>> On 15 Dec 2015, at 21:28, Michele Neylon - Blacknight >>> wrote: >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> I support this plan >>> >>> It makes a lot of sense on two fronts: 1 - making sure

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-16 Thread denis
Hi Alex On 16/12/2015 11:32, Alex Band wrote: Hi Michele, On 15 Dec 2015, at 21:28, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: Tim I support this plan It makes a lot of sense on two fronts: 1 - making sure there are abuse-c contacts for all resources 2 - making sure that it’s the correct / appropr

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] RIPE NCC to set abuse-c for remaining organisation with ASNs or other resources allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC

2015-12-15 Thread Piotr Strzyzewski
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:58:20PM +, Brian Nisbet wrote: > I know that we're getting near to what for a lot of people will be a well > deserved break at the end of the year, but it would be great if there could > be some feedback for the NCC on this, even if it's just agreement! :) I suppor