planetfeedback website

2000-11-09 Thread Clarence Verge
I saw an ad on TV and thought: "This is a GREAT idea." Maybe we can finally get something done about some of the bad websites. Planetfeedback.com - the place to go to register your complaints !! Then I visited your website and found that you rate my first complaint. 1) Your page took 58 seconds

ZBM

2000-11-09 Thread Ron Clarke
Hi Folks, From: "J. J. Young" >Ron noted: >>Got a nice big (just over 1 MB) .BMP and zipped it >>to .ZBM. >> >>The zip was reduced to about 85 % of the original .BMP. :( >> >> That is obviously not good enough, so what did I miss ? > G'day Ron. Your big bitmap was a photo, I wager.

MS DOSSHELL with Arachne

2000-11-09 Thread Ron Clarke
Hi Folks, Christof Lange wrote: > Although I am quite satisfied with the result, I have wondered, > whether the rather large programme DOSShell (that is basically > a file editor) is the only secure way to do task switching. > I will be very interested to read your experiences with FASTFLIP. > Wh

"Not any browser" sites: RACV in Oz

2000-11-09 Thread Ron Clarke
Hi Folks, Sam, L.D., Fraser, Sam wrote: > Why don't you just tell them that such information is most unhelpful. > Don't they realize that there just aren't any Javascript enabled browsers > that will run on your operating system? Wouldn't they prefer to have a > website accessible to all interne

Re: Printer Drivers

2000-11-09 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 23:00:34 -0500, "Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone written any printer drivers for Arachne that print more than > ASCII? What is it that you'de like to print? To which printer? -- Glenn (your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd) http://www.delorie.com/listserv/

outsight

2000-11-09 Thread Kali McLaughlin
Dear list: I had been losing about one in 20 emails at the save stage. Thinking it was just a corrupt version of Arachne 1.62 I downloaded 1.67, found it worked OK and so far has not refused wordwrap. It did however just eat a letter to Sam by throwing up the "save" screen and if you do you get t

Re: Printer Drivers

2000-11-09 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 23:00:34 -0500, "Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone written any printer drivers for Arachne that print more than > ASCII? What would you like to print? To which printer? (make and model #) -- Glenn (your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd) http://www.delorie.com

BUG (was Re: outsight)

2000-11-09 Thread Clarence Verge
Kali McLaughlin wrote: > > Dear list: > I had been losing about one in 20 emails at the save stage. Thinking it > was just a corrupt version of Arachne 1.62 I downloaded 1.67, found it > worked OK and so far has not refused wordwrap. Hi Kali; I could be wrong, but I don't think 1.67 is any diff

question of ISP compatibility {not free???}

2000-11-09 Thread tomstfor
Dear List: I think the issue of compatibility may be more of an issue in the future than even whether or not the ISP is free. Lord knows, those of us who don't have a lot or make a lot of money would like free ISP's. But realism says that free ISP's are ghosts in the present environment. Not

Re: "Not any browser" sites

2000-11-09 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Wed, 08 Nov 2000 18:07:10 -0500, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Nov 2000 08:18:39 +, Ron Clarke wrote: > >> I quote their latest reply - any suggestions ? >>> Dear Mr Clarke, > >>> As advised by Helen Haralam, Category Manager - Member Services, you are

Re: bmp2gif

2000-11-09 Thread Clarence Verge
Neil- san...Arachne User wrote: > > Case in pointI saw something on the list about bmp2gif and thought I > would like to give it a try. What ever I did, it worked. Now I don't > remember how I did it. I have it in Arachne but I don't see anything > about how to use it. Any suggestions? D

Re: "Not any browser" sites

2000-11-09 Thread J. J. Young
>> There's an article "Why use JavaScript?" at >> http://tech.irt.org/articles/js118/index.htm > >Tried twice to read this with 1.67. Both times, Arachne locked up after >fetching 25000 bytes. My apologies for not checking with Arachne. Please let me know if an Arachne-readable version is requi

Re: 16 MB RAM

2000-11-09 Thread J. J. Young
>One person managed to run Arachne on a 486 notebook with 8 MB RAM and >nonfunctional hard drive, using 1.44 MB diskettes and RAMDRIVE. -- A small but important correction: only one 1.44MB diskette is used. There's enough space left for a bit of mail, too :-) Regards, Jake

bmp2gif

2000-11-09 Thread Neil- san...
Hello all- I need to start keeping a log of what I do to make something work. My problem is I get something working and don't use it for a few days or so, and then when I try it again, I forgot what I did to get it going. Case in pointI saw something on the list about bmp2gif and thought I w

outsight

2000-11-09 Thread Kali McLaughlin
Dear list: I had been losing about one in 20 emails at the save stage. Thinking it was just a corrupt version of Arachne 1.62 I downloaded 1.67, found it worked OK and so far has not refused wordwrap. It did however just eat a letter to Sam by throwing up the "save" screen and if you do you get t

Re: "Not any browser" sites

2000-11-09 Thread Robert Deering
On Thu, 09 Nov 2000 08:18:39 +, Ron Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:29:54 -, Neil Smith wrote: >>> since almost all >>> vendors now have system requirements for their browsers that can only be >>> considered astronomical. > Ain't that the truth. I have been waging a one-man camp

Re: "Not any browser" sites

2000-11-09 Thread Neil Parks
On 9 Nov 00 at 19:56, arachne-digest wrote: > From: "J. J. Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There's an article "Why use JavaScript?" at > http://tech.irt.org/articles/js118/index.htm Tried twice to read this with 1.67. Both times, Arachne locked up after fetching 25000 bytes. -- ...This

Re: ZBM

2000-11-09 Thread Clarence Verge
Richard Menedetter wrote: > > CV> It also seems like a way to control EXACTLY what people see. > CV> Differing screen resolutions could present some difficulty in today's > CV> marketplace, but who knows what the future might bring ? > > Sorry ... but this is exactly the WRONG !!! way > HT

Re: Arachne & ADSL

2000-11-09 Thread Clarence Verge
Richard Menedetter wrote: > > TM> As far as I know, DSL connection is always on, like LAN or cable. > No ... IMHO you have to dial in ... > > TM> I believe DSL can be by DHCP, > TM> but DSL providers are leaning toward PPPoE. > > You mix up things > PPP is a protocol to get TCP/IP traffic

your website

2000-11-09 Thread Arachne4Dos
Hi there, I tried to access your website, to find it seems to be written mainly in Javascript, and for browsers above version 4.0 thus alienating and dis-barring a large number of potential visitors. Any competent web designer should be able to produce alternative "text only" and "HTML" on

Re: Edit Arachne's Hotlist

2000-11-09 Thread L.D. Best
On Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:34:55 +, Ron Clarke wrote: > A web site of collected, working, customisations ? That has got to be even > better than skins.:) > Or at least a set of mutually hyperlinked sites of instructions and > downloadable batch/OOK files ? > And it should impress a few Arac

Re: Virtual Arachne

2000-11-09 Thread L.D. Best
Despite people thinking otherwise, I happen to believe that there are a number of people out there using dozerware who would be glad to find Arachne. How many two year old laptops [well maybe 5 year old] can run the current doze-browsers? What about the older 'hand held' systems? I need a "port

undesired e-mail thrashing 1.67

2000-11-09 Thread L.D. Best
I thought I was possibly confused, but today had it confirmed. Something about the way InSight runs under 1.67 is really messing things up. Today I saw a message with a URL, I clicked on the URL and went to the site, then clicked the 'back arrow' ... only to receive a message that Arachne couldn'

Re: arachne-digest V1 #1332

2000-11-09 Thread Christof Lange
Hi, all, >Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:34:55 + >From: "Ron Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Edit Arachne's Hotlist > >I get the impression that many of us are looking at all sorts of >customisations for Arachne. I hope someone is gathering all these things >together in one place. W

NC.EXT vs. MIME.CFG

2000-11-09 Thread Christof Lange
>Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:34:55 + >From: "Ron Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Edit Arachne's Hotlist ... >> into an OOK file is a file manager > >Yup, I .OOK to Dos Navigator. >It has a .GIF that can be used as a link button. >I find it more useful than XTREE. >It is also a "de

FAQ: MS Dosshell with Arachne

2000-11-09 Thread Christof Lange
>Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:34:55 + >From: "Ron Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Edit Arachne's Hotlist ... >Well, almost as good - one can always shell out to DOS (Alt+E) and invoke >another application. Alternatively, I use FASTFLIP when I need to "multi-task" >my DOS programs (i

ZBM

2000-11-09 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi 08 Nov 2000, "Clarence Verge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CV> Another point worth thinking about: CV> It just took Arachne 54 sec to download and display home.arachne.cz. CV> It only took Arachne 23 sec to download and display an IMAGE of the CV> above. And that was the COMPLETE virtual pa

Arachne & ADSL

2000-11-09 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi 08 Nov 2000, "Thomas Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: TM> As far as I know, DSL connection is always on, like LAN or cable. No ... IMHO you have to dial in ... TM> I believe DSL can be by DHCP, TM> but DSL providers are leaning toward PPPoE. You mix up things PPP is a protocol to

Re: Printer Drivers

2000-11-09 Thread Or Botton
Michael is trying out the option of adding Postscript support for Arachne. But besides that, there isnt really a way for now.. If you have another program that can print graphics on your printer, then you can try this: Save the page itself into the disk using CTRL+P. This will save the HTML page

Re: 16 MB RAM

2000-11-09 Thread Clarence Verge
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000 02:16:25 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote: > By the way, I just came upon a long domain name, probably too long for Arachne? > http://www.herbal-viagra-for-impotence.8m.com > 45 characters including protocol but without trailing slash. Just curious Thomas - that looks slightl