On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 20:36:43 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Clarkson University Terminal Emulator [CUTE:2.2D/TC-D]
> Alt-H presents a summary of special keys
> Packet driver (PPPD220F)
> Class 1 Type 0 Version b Extended 2
> My Etheraddress: 0:2:12:0:56:34
> Sending BOOTPs: (Press to give up.)
Thanks Glenn,
Verrry Interesting !
Eric
__
| Ayrx |__\_ Eric S. Emerson
| E-male:~_: ! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`~(*)(*)~' `
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Glenn McCorkle wrot
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Neil T. wrote:
> I am a little nervous about this...put my
> boot disk in, (this is one I made using drdos) and at the c:\ prompt I
> typed "fdisk /mbr". I select #5 which asks if you want to creat a new
> MBR. Clicked 5 and get this message..."You have selected to replace
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Bernie wrote:
> Some ISPs require that you are logged into an account at them for FTP and
> mail services. An example would be my ISP, can't get the mail from other
> ISPs.
Must be rough. I'm glad I never ran into one of
those. My twovoyagers address is hosted on a serv
Hi Folks, Clarence,
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:55:04 +, Ron Clarke wrote:
> Don't want to start a thread of instructions, I will work it out in time
> - probably because I was actually connected to one ISP and attempted to
> log into my mail server on another ISP.
Clarence Verge wrote:
> To bad,
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Neil T. wrote:
> My idea was this: Since I got an error message when trying to
> set up drdos like I did on my laptop, I thought if I got rid of LILO I
> had and instead booted Linux with a floppy, I would be able to do the
> drdos thing.
After re-reading this, I'm wond
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, L.D. Best wrote:
> Had no problems, per se, with 1.70r3 ... the page renders poorly, has
> miles of code that should never have been written and ends up writing
> some stuff to screen that shouldn't be there [I don't *think* it should
> be there] but no crash.
Yup, this li
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> > http://www.dweckdata.com/Published/American.htm
>
> No problems using Dos v1.70;r3
I sure am looking forward to the day that the
Linux Arachne gets updated.
- Steve
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 10:44:22 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 21:28:44 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> I have now switched back to using v2.04g
> I'm just afraid that *everything* is going to be improved to the
> point where nothing'll work anymore!
Thank goodness that no-one has
Hello there,
I am new to this forum, so theese questions may already have been
answered, but I take a chance:
1) I have a Canon BN-22 laptop (486) b&w screen and built-in
printer. I have arachne v 1.65 installed, and downloaded v 1.70
and tried to install it. I executed the arach170.exe file and
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:04:36 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:55:04 +, Ron Clarke wrote:
>> BTW: I had a try at telnetting in to my mail server, without success,
>> using the telnet that comes as an Arachne APM plug-in.
>> Don't want to start a thread of instructions, I
Daniel Pruitt wrote:
>
> help;
>
> I am one of those dedicated DOS users, with his favorite DOS games. I
> have a DOS game that plays well when shelled from arachne and can be
> played via modem or direct null modem. Here is the question. Is there
> a way to play the game live, via telnet, li
Hey Group
Steve- thanks for the reply. I am a little nervous about this...put my
boot disk in, (this is one I made using drdos) and at the c:\ prompt I
typed "fdisk /mbr". I select #5 which asks if you want to creat a new
MBR. Clicked 5 and get this message..."You have selected to replace t
help;
I am one of those dedicated DOS users, with his favorite DOS games. I
have a DOS game that plays well when shelled from arachne and can be
played via modem or direct null modem. Here is the question. Is there
a way to play the game live, via telnet, like com/ip allows in windows
3.x, 9x,
Bernie wrote:
>
> Clarence wrote:
> >The above should not be a problem for you - it isn't for me.
> >What IS a problem is finding a site that supports Telnet.
> >Only 1 of my 3 ISPs does, and arachne.cz doesn't. :(
>
> You are mixing things up here Clarence. That there's no telnet deamon
> running
On another list service I have received a couple of virii (actually worms)
that were included as part of e-mail messages. As best as I could figure
out, they were "hidden" HTML, with one, IIRC, being after the signature.
They would "look" for different directories (e.g., windows), files (eg.,
Steve wrote:
>
> [the rest might interest Clarence but will probably be
> a terrible yawn for everyone else]
Thanks, Steve. It WAS interesting in several ways.
I hope others found it at least as educational as I did.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://hom
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 19:05:22 +0200, Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas wrote:
>> When a file is overwritten, don't the new bytes take the place of the old?
> Since it's not the _exact_ same placing on the disk (but very very close)
> you can get old data that was "removed" and "overwritt
L.D wrote:
>I always figured that SSL required the equivalent of a .pl or .dgi or
>.phwhatever program running in shell of choice.
No. SSL require that a SSL deamon is run (a deamon in UNIX is what a TSR is
in DOS, more or less anyway). What you can do with your shell account is
not interesting.
Clarence wrote:
>The above should not be a problem for you - it isn't for me.
>What IS a problem is finding a site that supports Telnet.
>Only 1 of my 3 ISPs does, and arachne.cz doesn't. :(
You are mixing things up here Clarence. That there's no telnet deamon
running at arachne.cz doesn't mean y
Thomas wrote:
>When a file is overwritten, don't the new bytes take the place of the old?
Since it's not the _exact_ same placing on the disk (but very very close)
you can get old data that was "removed" and "overwritten".
>Would it be accessible by software means alone, or would it require spec
Steve wrote:
> I've done this for years from many different places
>to several different pop3 servers. You certainly don't
>have to be dialed in to the same ISP on which the pop3
>server resides!
Some ISPs require that you are logged into an account at them for FTP and
mail services. An examp
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 21:28:44 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> I have now switched back to using v2.04g
I'm just afraid that *everything* is going to be improved to the
point where nothing'll work anymore!
Sam Ewalt
Croswell, Michigan, USA
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http:/
> In any case I have thus far not heard of a virus in a file that
> can do damage just be being downloaded to your PC, before it is
> executed or opened for reading. As there such viruses?
To my knowledge there are no such virrii... but if the execution or
opening is automatic harm can be done.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
> The above should not be a problem for you - it isn't for me.
> What IS a problem is finding a site that supports Telnet.
> Only 1 of my 3 ISPs does, and arachne.cz doesn't. :(
Normal telnet logins are received on port 23, but by
telnetting to port
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Neil T. wrote:
> I rebooted with the disk out and w98
> started partway and stopped with "Li_" sitting on a black
> screenWell, now with the disk in, Linux starts no problem but now I
> can't start my machine for w98. I know that this could be a good thing,
> but there a
Greetingswell I finally got root password figured out for the RH
7.0. I should have stopped therebut no, I still had to mess with
things. My idea was this: Since I got an error message when trying to
set up drdos like I did on my laptop, I thought if I got rid of LILO I
had and instead
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:20:45 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
> Clarence,
> Would you kindly check with your ISP ... it seems that they have an old,
> outdated, inaccurate, whatever listing from the ORBS joint ... and as a
> consequence are refusing mail from my IP.
It can't be too old, seems we communi
28 matches
Mail list logo
