Hi,
does anyone have any recommended (read tried and tested) way of making asterisk
be able to handle incoming faxes.
I've a PC running asterisk with a digium E1 card in and simply want to be able
to route a call to some application which will take a fax call and save the fax
as an image.
I
Hi,
I have read a lot about the thread of faxing support in Asterisk as
well as spanDSP. However, either I don't fully understand other
people's applications or may be what I'm trying to do is different
from what others are trying to do.
I have a very simple setup. I have an asterisk server
Hi All
I am using a Asterisk 1.6.1.6 and I have Digium cards TE122B for the PRI
line and TDM800P cards for connecting the telephone lines.The voice
calls are working fine.Now I need to connect FAX machines to this
TDM800P cards.Kindly let me know what all changes I need to make to make
the normal
Hi,
I plan on setting up an asterisk server to be used as an
email-2-fax/fax-2-email server, for a company that sends and receives
faxes almost 24/7 (milions of fax pages every month).
>From your experience in this, can Asterisk handle the heavy load? I
intend to purchase a Saphir V PRI ISDN Adap
Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax machine with
Asterisk? I suppose it coule be achieved by
using some ATA device, but is it possible without that?
Cheers,
Vedran.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
A
Hi,
I wonder, how reliable is spandsp for faxing with
asterisk as an endpoint when using digital pstn lines (Sangoma
AFT-board)?
Morten Tryfoss
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-
Hi,
I have configured Asterisk with Fax-to-Email feature. Fax is coming to
Asterisk through DID. What is happening is that sometimes Asterisk receives
Fax in first attempt and sometimes in 2 to 4 attempts. On DID Sip,G711 codec
& T.38 protocol is enabled.
Please advise me how I can make Fax servi
Hi,
How can we change the FROM address when Asterisk sends mail. For example it
is sending [EMAIL PROTECTED] in FROM , I need to change to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any help?
Thanks
Wazb
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-
Hi all I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success. I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes. extensions.conf - exten => 300,1,G
Hi
I know that this topic was on the list maybe dozen of times. But I
have a question regarding the fax support in asterisk, because all the
information I could get does not give me the clear view of if. I read
that Asterisk 1.8 will have strong fax (t.38) support, but I want to
know if these four
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 07:59, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> Hi,
> does anyone have any recommended (read tried and tested) way of making asterisk
> be able to handle incoming faxes.
>
> I've a PC running asterisk with a digium E1 card in and simply want to be able
> to route a call to some applicat
06 office
+1.215.243.8335 fax
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:59 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax
> Hi,
> does anyone have any recommended (read tried and tes
> "Darren" == Darren Nickerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> you might consider ... a digital fax board, like a Brooktrout
Darren> TR1034 of an Eicon Diva server.
Just be sure to shop around for the Brooktrout or Eicon boards;
froogle.google.com is your friend.
-JimC
_
Engineer
iFAX Solutions, Inc. www.ifax.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1.215.438.4638 ext 8106 office
+1.215.243.8335 fax
- Original Message -
From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:50 AM
Subject: Re:
> "Darren" == Darren Nickerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> Except that these boards are often sold by VARs like ourselves
Darren> who don't advertise prices in a way that makes it into
Darren> froogle, but are often cheaper than other channels.
Even better!
(The last time I took a
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 08:59, Darren Nickerson wrote:
> Except that these boards are often sold by VARs like ourselves who don't
> advertise prices in a way that makes it into froogle, but are often cheaper
> than other channels. For instance, we can usually beat CDW without much
> problem ;-)
Why
On Thursday 08 January 2004 08:59, Darren Nickerson wrote:
> Except that these boards are often sold by VARs like ourselves who
> don't advertise prices in a way that makes it into froogle, but are
> often cheaper than other channels. For instance, we can usually
> beat CDW without much problem ;-)
> Why wouldn't you publish your prices?
This is wa off-topic for asterisk-users. If you'd like to pursue
this with me privately, please feel free to do so.
Sincerely,
--
Darren Nickerson
Senior Sales & Support Engineer
iFAX Solutions, Inc. www.ifax.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1.215.438.4638 e
Hi,
I'm using an external SIP FXO gateway with Asterisk. I've got a fax machine
hooked up to an external SIP FXS. I can currently send faxes through
asterisk. I've been trying to get fax autodetection to work for inbound
pstn calls.
The relevant section of my extensions.conf is as follows:
[
any suggestion of a internal fax-modem type that works
well with Asterisk?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Use
Hi
Steve
We
have been struggling for some time to get spandsp working properly on our
asterisk system.
We
are using a TE410P card with a single E1 from our PTT (Zaptel primary clock
source) and another E1 to a NEC PBX.
The NEC
PBX in turn has an E1 connection to a Tenovis I55 PBX, wh
I want to setup a phone system that can allow the caller to type in a faxback number,
and automatically be sent a fax file. Is this possible with Asterisk? Or using
Asterisk & a Linux fax program? I've seen stuff about incoming faxes, but nothing
about outgoing. This is over a Zap channel, n
Dear allI have a Asterisk server (version 1.0.7) running with a TE110P card on a 3Ghz P4 machine (running nothing else but asterisk)So far so good.Today I was trying to receive faxes using spandsp fax client.I used spandsp v0.0.2pre18 (which compiled against libtiff 3.5.7)It compiled fine, installe
Mr. Rubinstein:
I have read a lot about the thread of faxing support in Asterisk as
well as spanDSP. However, either I don't fully understand other
people's applications or may be what I'm trying to do is different
from what others are trying to do.
The fax support discussions you have been
> I have read a lot about the thread of faxing support in Asterisk as
> well as spanDSP. However, either I don't fully understand other
> people's applications or may be what I'm trying to do is different
> from what others are trying to do.
>
> I have a very simple setup. I have an asterisk
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 10:12 -0700, George Pajari wrote:
> Mr. Rubinstein:
> > I have a very simple setup. I have an asterisk server with a TE110P
> > connected to the PSTN via T1 PRI (Asterisk A). I have another
> > asterisk server with a TDM40B board with 4 FXS ports (Asterisk B)
> > where
When we can expect to have a res_fax and res_fax_degium module for asterisk
V 1.6.2
Regards
Khaled Chehab
NGN Eng.
Untitled
Operations Office - Lebanon
Office : +961 1 868686 ext 115
Mobile: +961 3 045212
E-mail: kche...@xplorium.com
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:43 +0800, Gopalakrishnaiyer Venugopal-Q16770
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am using a Asterisk 1.6.1.6 and I have Digium cards TE122B for the
> PRI line and TDM800P cards for connecting the telephone lines.The
> voice calls are working fine.Now I need to connect FAX machines to
>
Stelios Koroneos wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:43 +0800, Gopalakrishnaiyer Venugopal-Q16770
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I am using a Asterisk 1.6.1.6 and I have Digium cards TE122B for the
>> PRI line and TDM800P cards for connecting the telephone lines.The
>> voice calls are working fine.N
Hello,
I was wondering if the following was possible:
When somebody sends a fax to my direct number 0101234567105 (my extension
will be 105) is it possible that Asterisk, or an addon sees this as a fax,
and e-mail the fax to me?
So everybody with a private extension will be able to receive faxes i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Alexandru Thomae
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 7:55 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I plan on
> > I plan on setting up an asterisk server to be used as an
> > email-2-fax/fax-2-email server, for a company that sends and
> > receives faxes almost 24/7 (milions of fax pages every month).
> >
> > >From your experience in this, can Asterisk handle the heavy load? I
> > intend to purchase a S
Joseph wrote:
> I'll second that.
> Hylafax has can handle the job. If you put asterisk in between you are
> looking for problems.
> I've the following setup working with asterisk NVBackgroundDetect
> implemented.
> PSTN <--> asterisk <--> hylafax
>
> It woks, I would say 90% of the time. There
Just an FYI http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2005080914234645
/b
On Aug 16, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Tamas J wrote:
Joseph wrote:
I'll second that.
Hylafax has can handle the job. If you put asterisk in between
you are
looking for problems.
I've the following setup working with asteris
Brian West wrote:
Just an FYI http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2005080914234645
Although Groklaw seems to think that these suits are about faxing, I
don't think that they really are. See:
http://www.hylafax.org/archive/2005-08/msg00107.html
Lee.
Although Groklaw seems to think that these suits are about faxing, I don't think that they really are. See: http://www.hylafax.org/archive/2005-08/msg00107.htmlLee.No it is really about faxing. As someone that has first hand knowledge of the case outlined on Groklaw, it is in fact about faxing.Go
Brian West wrote:
No it is really about faxing. As someone that has first hand
knowledge of the case outlined on Groklaw, it is in fact about faxing.
Go read the two patents very carefully! If you email it you break
638, if you store it you break 021.
How, then, do these patents themselv
Hi Lee,
Lee Howard wrote:
Brian West wrote:
Just an FYI http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2005080914234645
Although Groklaw seems to think that these suits are about faxing, I
don't think that they really are. See:
http://www.hylafax.org/archive/2005-08/msg00107.html
That me
Lee Howard wrote:
Brian West wrote:
No it is really about faxing. As someone that has first hand
knowledge of the case outlined on Groklaw, it is in fact about faxing.
Go read the two patents very carefully! If you email it you break
638, if you store it you break 021.
How, then, do t
Steve Underwood wrote:
That message isn't really well thought out,
Sorry, I'll do better next time. :-)
Lee.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
No.
_
From: Vedran Dakic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 8:07 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax
Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax machine with Asterisk? I
Users Mailing List
- Non-Commercial Discussion'
Asunto: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk
fax
Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax machine with
Asterisk? I suppose it coule be achieved by
using some ATA device, but is it possible without that?
Cheer
: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Asterisk fax
I use with success cisco
ata 186, linksys pap2 and Audiocodes MP108 with asterisk sending and receiving
faxes with regular analog fax machines, works very well. I have to set up all
to use g711 because I can not make it work with t.38 with asterisk.
I w
On Nov 26, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Steve Totaro wrote:
From: Vedran Dakic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 8:07 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax
Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax ma
> More specifically, you can make it work using an ATA or a TDM400P
> card with an fxs port, but it is not likely to be reliable. If you
> send a few faxes here and there, that shouldn't be a big deal. If you
> are talking about an office where lots of faxing is done, the lack of
> reliability will
On Nov 26, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Nowrot wrote:
More specifically, you can make it work using an ATA or a TDM400P
card with an fxs port, but it is not likely to be reliable. If you
send a few faxes here and there, that shouldn't be a big deal. If you
are talking about an office where lots of
Tom Rymes ha scritto:
However, I do think it is fairly clear that using an ATA is a less
than ideal solution for any serious faxing, since the fax protocol
often doesn't play nicely with the tendency of VOIP to occasionally
lose packets. YMMV, though, so try it out
Yep I can confirm this
Behalf Of Aaron
Daniel
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk FAX
Open voicemail.conf
Find serveremail=asterisk
If it's commented, uncomment it
Change it to the email address
Hi All,
I want to configure fax with Asterisk and I found that we can do this reliably
using G711 codec only. Currently my provider is supporting G729 and G711.
During the call initiation the call starts with G729 (1'st priority) and
somehow if the receiver is unable to receive call then we are pr
Open voicemail.conf
Find serveremail=asterisk
If it's commented, uncomment it
Change it to the email address you want it to be.
Aaron
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Wasif wrote:
Hi,
How can we change the FROM address when Asterisk sends mail. For example it
is sending [EMAIL PROTECTED] in FROM , I need
On 7/12/06, al gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email
I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success.
I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS
i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes.
Which version of spandsp d
> Hi all
>
> I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email
> I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success.
>
> I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS
> i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes.
>
> extensions.conf
> -
>
On 7/12/06, al gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email
I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success.
I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS
i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes.
extensions.conf
Hi, I was unable to build asterisk app_rxfax using asterisk-1.2.9.1 and spandsp-0.0.3
the makeing process kept giving me error:
app_rxfax.c: error: 't30_stats_t" has no member named 'column_resolution'
where should I get the proper app_rxfax.c and app_txfax.c? thanks.
On 7/12/06, Maxim Vexler <[
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 16:50 +0800, ven wrote:
> Hi, I was unable to build asterisk app_rxfax using asterisk-1.2.9.1
> and spandsp-0.0.3
> the makeing process kept giving me error:
> app_rxfax.c: error: 't30_stats_t" has no member named
> 'column_resolution'
>
> where should I get the proper app_r
thanks and I am sorry I just noticed the thread containing some compiling problem and after the intensive googling and searching for answers on maillists, i got somewhat outrageous which led to my direct reply to this thread.
well now I compiled app_rxfax and app_txfax successfully, but still no
Maxim Vexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 7/12/06, al gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>> Hi all>> I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email> I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success.>> I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS> i have created extension 300 which should
If there any way to pass on that problem, like i know the source should cancel the echo on the line. In addition i am trying to connect regular fax through ata to asterisk with no success. Regular Fax machine -> ata -> Asterisk. ata is registering to the asterisk as regular extension.
> If there any way to pass on that problem, like i know the source should
> cancel the echo on the line.
>
> In addition i am trying to connect regular fax through ata to asterisk
> with no success.
>
> Regular Fax machine -> ata -> Asterisk.
>
> ata is registering to the asterisk as regular
Hi,
I'm trying to create fax server with asterisk and spandsp. My situation is: now I can get faxes from fax machines and send tiff files attachments to users email boxes. But now want to create that I can get email (I'm using Postfix mail server) and send to fax machine. Dilemma is that I'm newb
On 09/06/2010 07:45 AM, Andrew Nowrot wrote:
> Hi
>
> I know that this topic was on the list maybe dozen of times. But I
> have a question regarding the fax support in asterisk, because all the
> information I could get does not give me the clear view of if. I read
> that Asterisk 1.8 will have st
Hello,
I have asterisk 1.6.2.9-2
I tried to install fax utility as it is shown on pdf documents on asterisk
site.
I downloaded Opteron compiled res_fax and res_fax_digium files and copied to
/usr/lib/asterisk/modules/ where default modules directory is.
I created a free fax license and created l
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Doug R wrote:
> I want to setup a phone system that can allow the caller to type in a
> faxback number, and automatically be sent a fax file. Is this possible
> with Asterisk? Or using Asterisk & a Linux fax program? I've seen
> stuff about incoming faxes, but nothing abou
I will try spandsp then.
On another note, what SIP server works best with Asterisk? I want to use Asterisk for
a PSTN gateway, and currently I am using as a SIP server since it seems like
everything else has so many firewall issues.
If I have all my SIP clients using the same codec, does it
> But when sending a fax (from a Brother fax
machine) the image received is always corrupted: lines are missing, > segments of the faxed page aren't there
etc...
Run
ZTTEST in /usr/src/zaptel. Your output should be 99.98XXX% or higher. If it
isn't the corruption is most likely because o
On 14/05/2005, at 3:59 AM, Colin Anderson wrote: Run ZTTEST in /usr/src/zaptel. Your output should be 99.98XXX% or higher. If it isn't the corruption is most likely because of IRQ misses by the card. Run it for a couple of minutes. Your "worst" should be 99.98XXX%. Subtle timing errors and IRQ mis
u said:
I will try upgrading to a newer kernel (I'm using Fedora Core 2 with
2.6.8 kernel), turn off hyper-threading and see if it makes any
difference...
i said:
wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on your
PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI
good
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 12:00 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on your PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI So you turned off Hyperthreading on your linux box or not??What could I do to check if my PRI has timing slips? I have
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello
On 15/05/2005, at 12:00 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:
wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on
your
PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI
So you turned off Hyperthreading on your linux box or not??
What could I do to check if m
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 1:55 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:The right thing to do is to sync to the PSTN. The E1s connected to the PSTN should be listed as the lowest numbered clock sources, starting from 1. Places you never want to sync to should be set to zero. Your mail was very interesting, but to be
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello
On 15/05/2005, at 1:55 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
The right thing to do is to sync to the PSTN. The E1s connected to
the PSTN should be listed as the lowest numbered clock sources,
starting from 1. Places you never want to sync to should be set to zero.
Your mail
Hello SteveOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-) I do not know if it was from upgrading
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-) Hum.. an interesti
On May 15, 2005, at 00:38, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bot
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello Steve
On 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as
the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock.
If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-)
I do no
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello
On 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as
the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock.
If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is
HiOn 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote:I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a PCI bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card. I've simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not have to learn work-arounds.This only happen if I have som
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
On 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote:
I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a PCI
bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card. I've
simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not have to learn
work-arounds.
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 5:49 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:I don't get that with a TE410P. What happens if you disconnect the cable first, so your box cannot sync to the port, and no longer treats the far end as the clock master? Can you remove the module like that? Whatever, it is a bug, and should be
On May 15, 2005, at 00:55, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
On 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote:
I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a
PCI bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card.
I've simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not
On 15/05/2005, at 5:58 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:Well, it could be worse. You could be using Dialogic card, which randomly crash the machine when you try to restart the drivers, and have continued to do so through 10 years of updates. :-\ Seriously, this really shouldn't happen. It must be a silly
On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to
> something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have
> saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the last year.
Someone's already done it:
http
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote:
Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to
something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have
saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the last year.
Someone
Steve Underwood wrote:
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Is there any future support for fax in colours? just wondering, I
don't think I've ever used it before anyway :)
Priorities:
1. T.38
2. A more complete T.30
3. ECM (which is really a part of 2)
4. Things like colour FAX (which in part is
Lee Howard wrote:
The next HylaFAX release (current CVS HEAD already has it) will have
color fax receiving support in Class 1/1.0... provided that the
prerequisites are met.
As HylaFAX depends on libtiff for it's image file handling color fax
support with HylaFAX requires that libtiff also supp
Steve Underwood wrote:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote:
Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to
something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have
saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Lee Howard wrote:
>
> > The other option to color faxing is JBIG compression. The problem
> > there, is that JBIG is fairly heavily patented still. Thus many fax
> > machines just aren't supporting it yet.
>
> Thanks Lee. I found that helpful, ex
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know
what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear
to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It
needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is rarely
right; that
Michael Welter wrote:
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who
know what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things
clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut
it. It needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally i
On 15 May 2005, at 17:26, Steve Underwood wrote:
Michael Welter wrote:
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people
who know what they are doing. What we need is something that
makes things clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally
clocked doesn't cut it. It nee
> > What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know
> > what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear
> > to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It
> > needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is rarel
Rich Adamson wrote:
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know
what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear
to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It
needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is r
How about this...
Replace the old text in /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.conf.sample:
# span=[,yellow]
#
# The timing parameter determines the selection of primary, secondary, and
# so on sync sources. If this span should be c
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Michael Welter wrote:
> Where is the clock source that the T1/E1 board, with "0" for timing,
> uses to generate the tx data stream? Is there a PLL on each board? Or
> is some central source used?
>
> For example, I have one system with two separate T100P cards--one for a
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Michael Welter wrote:
Where is the clock source that the T1/E1 board, with "0" for timing,
uses to generate the tx data stream? Is there a PLL on each board? Or
is some central source used?
For example, I have one system with two separate T100P car
> > How about this...
> >
> > Replace the old text in /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.conf.sample:
> > # span=,, > (LBO)>,,[,yellow]
> > #
> > # The timing parameter determines the selection of primary, secondary, and
> > # so on s
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Rich Adamson wrote:
> It doesn't make any difference. The pcm data that arrives from the telco
> is buffered in the zaptel and/or asterisk code, and sent out the second
> T1 card as soon as it can. That buffering reduces (or eliminates) the
> need to sync one T1 card to anothe
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >It is possible, though complicated, to synchronize the 2Mbit clocks on two
> >unrelated cards by measuring the accumulated phase shift (difference in
> >interrupt rate) over time and compensating, thus implementing a PLL in
> >software. Digium has
On 16/05/2005, at 11:48 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:How can that work? You can measure the error, but you have no ability to tweak the clock from software. Two cards could only be synced by hardware.Side questions about spandsp... Is it possible to print the fax header like what most faxes do (that i
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
It is possible, though complicated, to synchronize the 2Mbit clocks on two
unrelated cards by measuring the accumulated phase shift (difference in
interrupt rate) over time and compensating, thus implementing a PLL in
software.
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo