[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-07 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
Hi, does anyone have any recommended (read tried and tested) way of making asterisk be able to handle incoming faxes. I've a PC running asterisk with a digium E1 card in and simply want to be able to route a call to some application which will take a fax call and save the fax as an image. I

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-05-17 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
Hi, I have read a lot about the thread of faxing support in Asterisk as well as spanDSP. However, either I don't fully understand other people's applications or may be what I'm trying to do is different from what others are trying to do. I have a very simple setup. I have an asterisk server

[asterisk-users] Asterisk & Fax

2010-02-18 Thread Gopalakrishnaiyer Venugopal-Q16770
Hi All I am using a Asterisk 1.6.1.6 and I have Digium cards TE122B for the PRI line and TDM800P cards for connecting the telephone lines.The voice calls are working fine.Now I need to connect FAX machines to this TDM800P cards.Kindly let me know what all changes I need to make to make the normal

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-13 Thread Alexandru Thomae
Hi, I plan on setting up an asterisk server to be used as an email-2-fax/fax-2-email server, for a company that sends and receives faxes almost 24/7 (milions of fax pages every month). >From your experience in this, can Asterisk handle the heavy load? I intend to purchase a Saphir V PRI ISDN Adap

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Vedran Dakic
Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax machine with Asterisk? I suppose it coule be achieved by using some ATA device, but is it possible without that?   Cheers, Vedran. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- A

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-13 Thread Morten Tryfoss
Hi,   I wonder, how reliable is spandsp for faxing with asterisk as an endpoint when using digital pstn lines (Sangoma AFT-board)?       Morten Tryfoss ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk FAx

2006-04-28 Thread Wasif
Hi, I have configured Asterisk with Fax-to-Email feature. Fax is coming to Asterisk through DID. What is happening is that sometimes Asterisk receives Fax in first attempt and sometimes in 2 to 4 attempts. On DID Sip,G711 codec & T.38 protocol is enabled. Please advise me how I can make Fax servi

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk FAX

2006-04-20 Thread Wasif
Hi, How can we change the FROM address when Asterisk sends mail. For example it is sending [EMAIL PROTECTED] in FROM , I need to change to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any help? Thanks Wazb ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-

[asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-12 Thread al gav
Hi all   I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success.    I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes.   extensions.conf - exten => 300,1,G

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Fax

2010-09-06 Thread Andrew Nowrot
Hi I know that this topic was on the list maybe dozen of times. But I have a question regarding the fax support in asterisk, because all the information I could get does not give me the clear view of if. I read that Asterisk 1.8 will have strong fax (t.38) support, but I want to know if these four

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-07 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 07:59, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > Hi, > does anyone have any recommended (read tried and tested) way of making asterisk > be able to handle incoming faxes. > > I've a PC running asterisk with a digium E1 card in and simply want to be able > to route a call to some applicat

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-07 Thread Darren Nickerson
06 office +1.215.243.8335 fax - Original Message - From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:59 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax > Hi, > does anyone have any recommended (read tried and tes

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-08 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Darren" == Darren Nickerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Darren> you might consider ... a digital fax board, like a Brooktrout Darren> TR1034 of an Eicon Diva server. Just be sure to shop around for the Brooktrout or Eicon boards; froogle.google.com is your friend. -JimC _

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-08 Thread Darren Nickerson
Engineer iFAX Solutions, Inc. www.ifax.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.215.438.4638 ext 8106 office +1.215.243.8335 fax - Original Message - From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:50 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-08 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Darren" == Darren Nickerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Darren> Except that these boards are often sold by VARs like ourselves Darren> who don't advertise prices in a way that makes it into Darren> froogle, but are often cheaper than other channels. Even better! (The last time I took a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-08 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 08:59, Darren Nickerson wrote: > Except that these boards are often sold by VARs like ourselves who don't > advertise prices in a way that makes it into froogle, but are often cheaper > than other channels. For instance, we can usually beat CDW without much > problem ;-) Why

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-08 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 08 January 2004 08:59, Darren Nickerson wrote: > Except that these boards are often sold by VARs like ourselves who > don't advertise prices in a way that makes it into froogle, but are > often cheaper than other channels. For instance, we can usually > beat CDW without much problem ;-)

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + fax

2004-01-08 Thread Darren Nickerson
> Why wouldn't you publish your prices? This is wa off-topic for asterisk-users. If you'd like to pursue this with me privately, please feel free to do so. Sincerely, -- Darren Nickerson Senior Sales & Support Engineer iFAX Solutions, Inc. www.ifax.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.215.438.4638 e

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax detection

2003-09-20 Thread Zac Sprackett
Hi, I'm using an external SIP FXO gateway with Asterisk. I've got a fax machine hooked up to an external SIP FXS. I can currently send faxes through asterisk. I've been trying to get fax autodetection to work for inbound pstn calls. The relevant section of my extensions.conf is as follows: [

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax-modem

2005-01-19 Thread chawki hammoud
any suggestion of a internal fax-modem type that works well with Asterisk? __ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Use

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-06-18 Thread Les Caroto
Hi Steve   We have been struggling for some time to get spandsp working properly on our asterisk system. We are using a TE410P card with a single E1 from our PTT (Zaptel primary clock source) and another E1 to a NEC PBX. The NEC PBX in turn has an E1 connection to a Tenovis I55 PBX, wh

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk & fax-out

2004-06-03 Thread Doug R
I want to setup a phone system that can allow the caller to type in a faxback number, and automatically be sent a fax file. Is this possible with Asterisk? Or using Asterisk & a Linux fax program? I've seen stuff about incoming faxes, but nothing about outgoing. This is over a Zap channel, n

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-13 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Dear allI have a Asterisk server (version 1.0.7) running with a TE110P card on a 3Ghz P4 machine (running nothing else but asterisk)So far so good.Today I was trying to receive faxes using spandsp fax client.I used spandsp v0.0.2pre18 (which compiled against libtiff 3.5.7)It compiled fine, installe

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-05-17 Thread George Pajari
Mr. Rubinstein: I have read a lot about the thread of faxing support in Asterisk as well as spanDSP. However, either I don't fully understand other people's applications or may be what I'm trying to do is different from what others are trying to do. The fax support discussions you have been

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-05-17 Thread Rich Adamson
> I have read a lot about the thread of faxing support in Asterisk as > well as spanDSP. However, either I don't fully understand other > people's applications or may be what I'm trying to do is different > from what others are trying to do. > > I have a very simple setup. I have an asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-05-17 Thread Adam Goryachev
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 10:12 -0700, George Pajari wrote: > Mr. Rubinstein: > > I have a very simple setup. I have an asterisk server with a TE110P > > connected to the PSTN via T1 PRI (Asterisk A). I have another > > asterisk server with a TDM40B board with 4 FXS ports (Asterisk B) > > where

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Fax Module

2009-11-02 Thread Khaled W Chehab
When we can expect to have a res_fax and res_fax_degium module for asterisk V 1.6.2 Regards Khaled Chehab NGN Eng. Untitled Operations Office - Lebanon Office : +961 1 868686 ext 115 Mobile: +961 3 045212 E-mail: kche...@xplorium.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk & Fax

2010-02-18 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:43 +0800, Gopalakrishnaiyer Venugopal-Q16770 wrote: > Hi All > > I am using a Asterisk 1.6.1.6 and I have Digium cards TE122B for the > PRI line and TDM800P cards for connecting the telephone lines.The > voice calls are working fine.Now I need to connect FAX machines to >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk & Fax

2010-02-18 Thread Murray Melvin
Stelios Koroneos wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:43 +0800, Gopalakrishnaiyer Venugopal-Q16770 > wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> I am using a Asterisk 1.6.1.6 and I have Digium cards TE122B for the >> PRI line and TDM800P cards for connecting the telephone lines.The >> voice calls are working fine.N

[asterisk-users] asterisk fax handeling

2010-03-17 Thread Peter den Hartog
Hello, I was wondering if the following was possible: When somebody sends a fax to my direct number 0101234567105 (my extension will be 105) is it possible that Asterisk, or an addon sees this as a fax, and e-mail the fax to me? So everybody with a private extension will be able to receive faxes i

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-13 Thread Tom Rymes
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Alexandru Thomae > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 7:55 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax > > > Hi, > > I plan on

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-13 Thread Joseph
> > I plan on setting up an asterisk server to be used as an > > email-2-fax/fax-2-email server, for a company that sends and > > receives faxes almost 24/7 (milions of fax pages every month). > > > > >From your experience in this, can Asterisk handle the heavy load? I > > intend to purchase a S

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Tamas J
Joseph wrote: > I'll second that. > Hylafax has can handle the job. If you put asterisk in between you are > looking for problems. > I've the following setup working with asterisk NVBackgroundDetect > implemented. > PSTN <--> asterisk <--> hylafax > > It woks, I would say 90% of the time. There

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Brian West
Just an FYI http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2005080914234645 /b On Aug 16, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Tamas J wrote: Joseph wrote: I'll second that. Hylafax has can handle the job. If you put asterisk in between you are looking for problems. I've the following setup working with asteris

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Lee Howard
Brian West wrote: Just an FYI http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2005080914234645 Although Groklaw seems to think that these suits are about faxing, I don't think that they really are. See: http://www.hylafax.org/archive/2005-08/msg00107.html Lee.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Brian West
Although Groklaw seems to think that these suits are about faxing, I don't think that they really are.  See: http://www.hylafax.org/archive/2005-08/msg00107.htmlLee.No it is really about faxing.  As someone that has first hand knowledge of the case outlined on Groklaw, it is in fact about faxing.Go

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Lee Howard
Brian West wrote: No it is really about faxing. As someone that has first hand knowledge of the case outlined on Groklaw, it is in fact about faxing. Go read the two patents very carefully! If you email it you break 638, if you store it you break 021. How, then, do these patents themselv

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Lee, Lee Howard wrote: Brian West wrote: Just an FYI http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2005080914234645 Although Groklaw seems to think that these suits are about faxing, I don't think that they really are. See: http://www.hylafax.org/archive/2005-08/msg00107.html That me

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Lee Howard wrote: Brian West wrote: No it is really about faxing. As someone that has first hand knowledge of the case outlined on Groklaw, it is in fact about faxing. Go read the two patents very carefully! If you email it you break 638, if you store it you break 021. How, then, do t

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax

2005-08-16 Thread Lee Howard
Steve Underwood wrote: That message isn't really well thought out, Sorry, I'll do better next time. :-) Lee. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Steve Totaro
No. _ From: Vedran Dakic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 8:07 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax machine with Asterisk? I

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Federico Piergentili
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Asunto: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax   Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax machine with Asterisk? I suppose it coule be achieved by using some ATA device, but is it possible without that?   Cheer

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Vedran Dakic
: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax   I use with success cisco ata 186, linksys pap2 and Audiocodes MP108 with asterisk sending and receiving faxes with regular analog fax machines, works very well. I have to set up all to use g711 because I can not make it work with t.38 with asterisk. I w

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Tom Rymes
On Nov 26, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Steve Totaro wrote: From: Vedran Dakic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 8:07 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax Is there a way to use a regular (analog) fax ma

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Andrew Nowrot
> More specifically, you can make it work using an ATA or a TDM400P > card with an fxs port, but it is not likely to be reliable. If you > send a few faxes here and there, that shouldn't be a big deal. If you > are talking about an office where lots of faxing is done, the lack of > reliability will

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Tom Rymes
On Nov 26, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Nowrot wrote: More specifically, you can make it work using an ATA or a TDM400P card with an fxs port, but it is not likely to be reliable. If you send a few faxes here and there, that shouldn't be a big deal. If you are talking about an office where lots of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk fax

2005-11-26 Thread Sergio Chersovani
Tom Rymes ha scritto: However, I do think it is fairly clear that using an ATA is a less than ideal solution for any serious faxing, since the fax protocol often doesn't play nicely with the tendency of VOIP to occasionally lose packets. YMMV, though, so try it out Yep I can confirm this

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk FAX

2006-04-20 Thread Damon Estep
Behalf Of Aaron Daniel Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk FAX Open voicemail.conf Find serveremail=asterisk If it's commented, uncomment it Change it to the email address

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Fax Question

2006-03-03 Thread mkumar
Hi All, I want to configure fax with Asterisk and I found that we can do this reliably using G711 codec only. Currently my provider is supporting G729 and G711. During the call initiation the call starts with G729 (1'st priority) and somehow if the receiver is unable to receive call then we are pr

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk FAX

2006-04-20 Thread Aaron Daniel
Open voicemail.conf Find serveremail=asterisk If it's commented, uncomment it Change it to the email address you want it to be. Aaron On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Wasif wrote: Hi, How can we change the FROM address when Asterisk sends mail. For example it is sending [EMAIL PROTECTED] in FROM , I need

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-12 Thread Steve Davies
On 7/12/06, al gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success. I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes. Which version of spandsp d

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-12 Thread garth
> Hi all > > I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email > I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success. > > I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS > i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes. > > extensions.conf > - >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-12 Thread Maxim Vexler
On 7/12/06, al gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success. I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS i have created extension 300 which should receive faxes. extensions.conf

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-14 Thread ven
Hi, I was unable to build asterisk app_rxfax using asterisk-1.2.9.1 and spandsp-0.0.3 the makeing process kept giving me error: app_rxfax.c: error: 't30_stats_t" has no member named 'column_resolution'   where should I get the proper app_rxfax.c and app_txfax.c? thanks.  On 7/12/06, Maxim Vexler <[

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-14 Thread Patrick
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 16:50 +0800, ven wrote: > Hi, I was unable to build asterisk app_rxfax using asterisk-1.2.9.1 > and spandsp-0.0.3 > the makeing process kept giving me error: > app_rxfax.c: error: 't30_stats_t" has no member named > 'column_resolution' > > where should I get the proper app_r

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-15 Thread ven
thanks and I am sorry I just noticed the thread containing some compiling problem and after the intensive googling and searching for answers on maillists, i got somewhat outrageous which led to my direct reply to this thread.   well now I compiled app_rxfax and app_txfax successfully, but still no

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-16 Thread al gav
Maxim Vexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 7/12/06, al gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>> Hi all>> I need a help with asterisk+fax -> fax to email> I am trying to setup fax to email with asterisk with no success.>> I have asterisk 1.2.9.1 running on CentOS> i have created extension 300 which should

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-18 Thread al gav
If there any way to pass on that problem, like i  know the source should cancel the echo on the line.   In addition i am trying to connect regular fax through ata to asterisk with no success.   Regular Fax machine -> ata -> Asterisk.   ata is registering to the asterisk as regular extension.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + fax

2006-07-19 Thread Benchev
> If there any way to pass on that problem, like i know the source should > cancel the echo on the line. > > In addition i am trying to connect regular fax through ata to asterisk > with no success. > > Regular Fax machine -> ata -> Asterisk. > > ata is registering to the asterisk as regular

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Fax Server

2006-09-30 Thread Giedrius Augys
Hi,  I'm trying to create fax server with asterisk and spandsp. My situation is: now I can get faxes from fax machines and send tiff files attachments to users  email boxes. But now want to create that I can get email (I'm using Postfix mail server) and send to fax machine. Dilemma is that I'm newb

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Fax

2010-09-06 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 09/06/2010 07:45 AM, Andrew Nowrot wrote: > Hi > > I know that this topic was on the list maybe dozen of times. But I > have a question regarding the fax support in asterisk, because all the > information I could get does not give me the clear view of if. I read > that Asterisk 1.8 will have st

[asterisk-users] asterisk fax problem

2011-01-11 Thread Oguzhan Kayhan
Hello, I have asterisk 1.6.2.9-2 I tried to install fax utility as it is shown on pdf documents on asterisk site. I downloaded Opteron compiled res_fax and res_fax_digium files and copied to /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/ where default modules directory is. I created a free fax license and created l

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk & fax-out

2004-06-03 Thread steve
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Doug R wrote: > I want to setup a phone system that can allow the caller to type in a > faxback number, and automatically be sent a fax file. Is this possible > with Asterisk? Or using Asterisk & a Linux fax program? I've seen > stuff about incoming faxes, but nothing abou

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk & fax-out

2004-06-04 Thread Doug R
I will try spandsp then. On another note, what SIP server works best with Asterisk? I want to use Asterisk for a PSTN gateway, and currently I am using as a SIP server since it seems like everything else has so many firewall issues. If I have all my SIP clients using the same codec, does it

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-13 Thread Colin Anderson
 > But when sending a fax (from a Brother fax machine) the image received is always corrupted: lines are missing,  > segments of the faxed page aren't there etc...    Run ZTTEST in /usr/src/zaptel. Your output should be 99.98XXX% or higher. If it isn't the corruption is most likely because o

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-13 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On 14/05/2005, at 3:59 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:  Run ZTTEST in /usr/src/zaptel. Your output should be 99.98XXX% or higher. If it isn't the corruption is most likely because of IRQ misses by the card. Run it for a couple of minutes. Your "worst" should be 99.98XXX%. Subtle timing errors and IRQ mis

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-14 Thread Colin Anderson
u said: I will try upgrading to a newer kernel (I'm using Fedora Core 2 with 2.6.8 kernel), turn off hyper-threading and see if it makes any difference... i said: wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on your PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI good

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-14 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 12:00 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on your PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI So you turned off Hyperthreading on your linux box or not??What could I do to check if my PRI has timing slips? I have

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Underwood
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Hello On 15/05/2005, at 12:00 AM, Colin Anderson wrote: wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on your PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI So you turned off Hyperthreading on your linux box or not?? What could I do to check if m

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-14 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 1:55 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:The right thing to do is to sync to the PSTN. The E1s connected to the PSTN should be listed as the lowest numbered clock sources, starting from 1. Places you never want to sync to should be set to zero. Your mail was very interesting, but to be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Underwood
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Hello On 15/05/2005, at 1:55 PM, Steve Underwood wrote: The right thing to do is to sync to the PSTN. The E1s connected to the PSTN should be listed as the lowest numbered clock sources, starting from 1. Places you never want to sync to should be set to zero. Your mail

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hello SteveOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-) I do not know if it was from upgrading

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-) Hum.. an interesti

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Bryce Chidester
On May 15, 2005, at 00:38, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bot

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Hello Steve On 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote: The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-) I do no

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Hello On 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
HiOn 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote:I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a PCI bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card. I've simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not have to learn work-arounds.This only happen if I have som

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Hi On 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote: I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a PCI bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card. I've simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not have to learn work-arounds.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 5:49 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:I don't get that with a TE410P. What happens if you disconnect the cable first, so your box cannot sync to the port, and no longer treats the far end as the clock master? Can you remove the module like that? Whatever, it is a bug, and should be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Bryce Chidester
On May 15, 2005, at 00:55, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Hi On 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote: I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a PCI bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card. I've simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On 15/05/2005, at 5:58 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:Well, it could be worse. You could be using Dialogic card, which randomly crash the machine when you try to restart the drivers, and have continued to do so through 10 years of updates. :-\ Seriously, this really shouldn't happen. It must be a silly

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote: > Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to > something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have > saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the last year. Someone's already done it: http

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote: Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the last year. Someone

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Lee Howard
Steve Underwood wrote: Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Is there any future support for fax in colours? just wondering, I don't think I've ever used it before anyway :) Priorities: 1. T.38 2. A more complete T.30 3. ECM (which is really a part of 2) 4. Things like colour FAX (which in part is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Lee Howard wrote: The next HylaFAX release (current CVS HEAD already has it) will have color fax receiving support in Class 1/1.0... provided that the prerequisites are met. As HylaFAX depends on libtiff for it's image file handling color fax support with HylaFAX requires that libtiff also supp

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Steve Underwood wrote: Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote: Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Lee Howard
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote: > Lee Howard wrote: > > > The other option to color faxing is JBIG compression. The problem > > there, is that JBIG is fairly heavily patented still. Thus many fax > > machines just aren't supporting it yet. > > Thanks Lee. I found that helpful, ex

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Michael Welter
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is rarely right; that

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Michael Welter wrote: What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally i

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread tim panton
On 15 May 2005, at 17:26, Steve Underwood wrote: Michael Welter wrote: What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It nee

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Rich Adamson
> > What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know > > what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear > > to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It > > needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is rarel

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Underwood
Rich Adamson wrote: What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is r

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-16 Thread Michael Welter
How about this... Replace the old text in /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.conf.sample: # span=[,yellow] # # The timing parameter determines the selection of primary, secondary, and # so on sync sources. If this span should be c

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-16 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Michael Welter wrote: > Where is the clock source that the T1/E1 board, with "0" for timing, > uses to generate the tx data stream? Is there a PLL on each board? Or > is some central source used? > > For example, I have one system with two separate T100P cards--one for a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Peter Svensson wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005, Michael Welter wrote: Where is the clock source that the T1/E1 board, with "0" for timing, uses to generate the tx data stream? Is there a PLL on each board? Or is some central source used? For example, I have one system with two separate T100P car

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-16 Thread Rich Adamson
> > How about this... > > > > Replace the old text in /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.conf.sample: > > # span=,, > (LBO)>,,[,yellow] > > # > > # The timing parameter determines the selection of primary, secondary, and > > # so on s

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-16 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Rich Adamson wrote: > It doesn't make any difference. The pcm data that arrives from the telco > is buffered in the zaptel and/or asterisk code, and sent out the second > T1 card as soon as it can. That buffering reduces (or eliminates) the > need to sync one T1 card to anothe

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-16 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote: > >It is possible, though complicated, to synchronize the 2Mbit clocks on two > >unrelated cards by measuring the accumulated phase shift (difference in > >interrupt rate) over time and compensating, thus implementing a PLL in > >software. Digium has

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-16 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On 16/05/2005, at 11:48 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:How can that work? You can measure the error, but you have no ability to tweak the clock from software. Two cards could only be synced by hardware.Side questions about spandsp... Is it possible to print the fax header like what most faxes do (that i

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - fax - spandsp

2005-05-17 Thread Steve Underwood
Peter Svensson wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote: It is possible, though complicated, to synchronize the 2Mbit clocks on two unrelated cards by measuring the accumulated phase shift (difference in interrupt rate) over time and compensating, thus implementing a PLL in software.

  1   2   >