Hi list,
Sometimes I receive a Red Alarm in my E1 trunk (E&M immediate start
signaling), and just few seconds after this, all alarms are cleared.
This problem ocurrs many times/day, and if are calls in progress,
these calls just hang-up.
Could it be an asterisk bug? Or may
I posted a while ago, about the FXO card entering a non-operational
state. While in a call, all of a sudden, there's this loud noise, and
the card remains like that until I reload the wcfxo module. There's no
way to dial in or out the FXO unless the module is reloaded.
I made some progress... I wa
Hi,
What is the meaning of:
Jan 17 18:05:21 WARNING[2388]: chan_zap.c:6315
handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 2: Red AlarmJan 17 18:05:21
WARNING[2388]: chan_zap.c:1432 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo
cancellation on channel 2Jan 17 18:05:21 WARNING[2388]: chan_zap.c:6315
I'd suggest your telco doing loopup and checking the circuit.
regards
Martin
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Eduardo Goncalves wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Sometimes I receive a Red Alarm in my E1 trunk (E&M immediate start
> signaling), and just few seconds after this, all alarms are cleared.
> This p
> > Sometimes I receive a Red Alarm in my E1 trunk (E&M immediate
> > start
> > signaling), and just few seconds after this, all alarms are
cleared.
> >
> > This problem ocurrs many times/day, and if are calls in progress,
> > these calls just hang-up.
> > Could it be an asterisk b
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:15:21 -0600
Don Pobanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You also need to verify that you are using loop timing and not
> internal timing. (Your telco will provide timing)
>
> in zaptel.conf you should have something like
> span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
> where the second 1 says to use
i am using t/e410 and my config is just like yours, works great.
azher Eduardo Goncalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:15:21 -0600Don Pobanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> You also need to verify that you are using loop timing and not> internal timing. (Your telco will provide timi
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:15:21 -0600
Don Pobanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sometimes I receive a Red Alarm in my E1 trunk (E&M immediate
> > > start
> > > signaling), and just few seconds after this, all alarms are
> cleared.
> > >
> > > This problem ocurrs many times/day, and if are call
: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:15:21 -0600
Don Pobanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sometimes I receive a Red Alarm in my E1 trunk (E&M immediate
> > > start
> > > signal
significantly decreased. If you still have
problems, check your RJ-48X jack for connection problems.
-sb
-Original Message-
From: Eduardo Goncalves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:14:17 +0800
Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An E1 can be a long way from the box with the right cable. However
> many people use the wrong cable. Using a LAN cable for an E1 often
> gives errors if the cable is more than just a few metres long.
> Although the pl
Check if you configured the clocking from their circuit correctly. You
need to have span=1,1 ... in zaptel.conf
Martin
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Eduardo Goncalves wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:15:21 -0600
> Don Pobanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Sometimes I receive a Red Alarm in my E1
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:42:36 -0600 (CST)
Martin Pycko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check if you configured the clocking from their circuit correctly. You
> need to have span=1,1 ... in zaptel.conf
>
This is my zaptel.conf:
span=1,1,0,cas,hdb3
alaw=1-8
e&m=1-8
loadzone = us
defaultzone=u
If you use TE410P make sure you have a recent zaptel from CVS.
Martin
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Eduardo Goncalves wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:42:36 -0600 (CST)
> Martin Pycko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Check if you configured the clocking from their circuit correctly. You
> > need to have spa
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:46:35 -0600 (CST)
Martin Pycko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you use TE410P make sure you have a recent zaptel from CVS.
>
> Martin
>
My card is E400P.. About the cable lenght. The cables are like this:
[telco]about 250 feet, bnc cable[baloon]---short L
Eduardo,
Hmm, the coax is 75ohm correct? Also, since you are pushing the signal
a little over 250ft you will probably need to set a different LBO value
in the "span=" line. I'd probably try 1 or 2 (assuming a DSX-1
interface).
THX/BDH
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 14
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:38:34 -0500
Brian D Heaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduardo,
>
> Hmm, the coax is 75ohm correct? Also, since you are pushing the
> signal
> a little over 250ft you will probably need to set a different LBO
> value in the "span=" line. I'd probably try 1 or
I hit send too quickly. When you say the telco checked the line what
did they do? In the US the telco would loop up the NIU (also called
SmartJack) and run a quick bit-error rate test (BERT) to it. I'm
guessing a similar device exists on South American circuits. Your 250'
of coax, balun, and pa
Eduardo,
Probably is not the solution, but try to use two telephone twisted pairs
instead of the LAN cable. The impedance must be 120 ohms at 1.024 Mhz.
LAN cable does not fulfil this requirement.
Jorge
Eduardo Goncalves wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:46:35 -0600 (CST)
Martin Pycko <[EMAIL PROT
On Tuesday, Nov 4, 2003, at 13:54 America/Chicago, Brian D Heaton wrote:
If you can take it out of service for a bit I'd pop a loopback up using
on the RJ45 side of the balum (baloon) and see if they can run a clean
BERT to that for about an hour. If you've got an intermittent problem
you should
Tim,
Yep, I fat fingered it. I know about baluns and ununs too .
THX/BDH
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 16:01, Timothy Costello wrote:
> Just a terminology pedant (sorry in advance)...
>
> It should be "balun" from the 2 words balanced and unbalanced as it is
> a "co
> An E1 can be a long way from the box with the right cable. However many
> people use the wrong cable. Using a LAN cable for an E1 often gives
> errors if the cable is more than just a few metres long. Although the
> plugs look the same, the twisted pairs should be grouped differently in
> an E1 c
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
An E1 can be a long way from the box with the right cable. However many
people use the wrong cable. Using a LAN cable for an E1 often gives
errors if the cable is more than just a few metres long. Although the
plugs look the same, the twisted pairs should be grouped differe
Hi!
I'm trying to setup a Wildcard TE110P with a PRI in The Netherlands.
I get a Red Alarm on the line.
Is there any way of debugging this? I've tried some configs that should
work but without success. Is there any way of telling if the cabling is
correct or what else the problem could be?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marconi Rivello
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 1:47 PM
> To: Asterisk
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm
>
> I made some progress... I was looking for an
Red
alarm on PRI is a physical layer problem, as in your telco had an outage or
soemone unplugged the cable.
-Original Message-From: Dov Bigio
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:02
PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject:
[Asterisk-Users] red
Alarms Span
RED wildcard X101P Board1
OK wcusb/0 0
ive got my asterisk server up and running and working correctly, the first
time after a reinstall and reboot everything was fine - i had both alarms
OK and i could get the USB extension ringing when i ran the house numbe
I'm having sporadic problems with my X100P card. When trying trying to
call out I get a message on the console that the channel is busy even though I
have bounced asterisk. It seems the card grabs the line and doesn't let go.
When I try to call the number I get a busy signal. If I perform a rm
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Remco Barende wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a Wildcard TE110P with a PRI in The Netherlands.
>
> I get a Red Alarm on the line.
>
> Is there any way of debugging this? I've tried some configs that should
> work but without success. Is there any way of telling if the cabling
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Peter Svensson wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Remco Barende wrote:
I'm trying to setup a Wildcard TE110P with a PRI in The Netherlands.
I get a Red Alarm on the line.
Is there any way of debugging this? I've tried some configs that should
work but without success. Is there
hello there,
i also using the same board and configure for the E1
before this i also got the same problem.
what the problem are:
1. cabling
2. and the zaptel.conf
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
bchan=1-15,17-31 # set this to 1-15,17-31 for E1
dchan=16 # set this to 16 for E1
i get this
Hi,
I have the following config, which I can elaborate on if
necessary:
TDM400P REV E/F
X100P (X101P)
PII-450
Linux version 2.6.8-gentoo-r3
gcc version 3.3.4 20040623
Asterisk CVS-HEAD-09/05/04-09:28:57
Last night I had called into this system a
> as soon as i tried again i got a red alarm on the wildcard board. now im
> using the sample configuration files for the devkit lite (downloaded from
> the website) and i know that the loadzone settings will be different here
> (serbia)
Red Alarm on an X100P means that it does not detect a phone
Red Alarm on an X100P means that it does not detect a phone line connected
to the device. I would double check your cabling. The loadzone only has
to do with the sound of dialtone, etc, and i wouldn't mess with it until
you have the basic functionality working.
ok now i when i plug the phoneline
im posting this again because i didnt get a reply to it earlier and i think
its a fairly major problem.
Red Alarm on an X100P means that it does not detect a phone line connected
to the device. I would double check your cabling. The loadzone only has
to do with the sound of dialtone, etc, and i
hi all,
can anyone give solution for this.
wct1xxp - Digium Wildcard T100P T1/PRI Card 0
zttool gives
RED Digium Wildcard T100P T1/PRI Card 0
my zaptel.conf look like this
span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=1-23
dchan=24
loadzone=us
defaultzone=us
the above 5 lines only place
homas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 6:56 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm on X100P
> Hi,
>
> I have the following config, which I can elaborate on if
> necessary:
>
> TDM400P REV E/F
&
e -
> From: "Mark C. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 6:56 AM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm on X100P
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the following config, which I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark C. Thomas
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm on X100P
>
> I haven't tried disconnecting the phone line, I'll try that
> next time.
> If it
the line jack.
Lyle
- Original Message -
From: "Mark C. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 6:56 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm on X100P
Hi,
I have the following config, which I can elaborate on if
neces
--- Brent Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> We had a similar issue about a year ago. We eventually
> figured out that
> our Promise Array (ATA RAID) Controller cards were
> causing the X100P
> card to go into RedAlarm. It would come out on its own
> sometimes,
> others not.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:13:58 -0500, Bob Klepfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3) It could be the motherboard. We're on the cheap here and used
> available components to make our server...worked fine with two x100's,
> then the boss wanted another line. Once I got the damn thing to accept
> them
Hi all,
I have an TE11 card and I installed the zaptel driver from digium.
The zaptel.conf look like:
span=1,1,0,esf,b8sz,yellow
bchan=1-23
dchan=24
when I tried modprobe -v wcte11xp without any error message
and then ztttol
I received the error "Red alarm"
What would be the problem?
Thanks in a
le
- Original Message -
From:
Murali
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:40
AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm -
Config Zaptel card
hi all,can anyone give solution for this. wct1xxp
- Digium Wildcard T100P
Dear members of the list,
I have difficulties to obtain sync with a Digium TE420 PCI Express
For four entries E1, In my case I am with only 3 E1s available to
configure. The
telephony operator is BrasilTelecom and Signaling is R2 Digital.
The information I have is that are E1s with 32 channels,
Hello,
About every 2 or 3 days I notice in the messages log file:
Dec 17 08:39:27 WARNING[1220]: Detected alarm on channel 2: Red Alarm
Dec 17 08:39:27 WARNING[1220]: Detected alarm on channel 3: Red Alarm
Dec 17 08:39:27 WARNING[1220]: Detected alarm on channel 4: Red Alarm
Dec 17 08:39:27 WARNI
Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
> Dear members of the list,
>
> I have difficulties to obtain sync with a Digium TE420 PCI Express
> For four entries E1, In my case I am with only 3 E1s available to
> configure. The
> telephony operator is BrasilTelecom and Signaling is R2 Digital.
>
*snipped
Richard,
so I sould use 'unused' for de 4th span, but I don't find information
about how do this
configuration. I think it's something like this:
span=4,0,0,unused
that's it ? What do you think ?
If it's dosn't work I will check for de cable buildings.
Thank you for your help !
2007/12/3, Ri
Your problem seems to be that the card is in T1 mode and you need it to
be in E1 mode. Check the jumpers on the card and change them to the E1
position. Or you can send the module a parameter to put the card in E1
mode.
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:14 -0200, Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
>
#span=4,0,0,cas,hdb3
^ uncomment that
and
cas=1-15:1101
cas=17-31:1101
cas=32-46:1101
cas=48-62:1101
cas=63-77:1101
cas=79-93:1101
unused=94-124 #whatever your ending is
Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
> Richard,
>
> so I sould use 'unused' for de 4th span, but I don't find information
>
Richard,
Thanks understood I will use this configurations for de last span. But
I think the Carlos Chávez are right about this. I realy forgot to put
jumpers to set E1 mode in TE420 card, if it's come with the jumpers
open (and I believe this) probably this is the problem.
I don't know what param
On Monday 03 December 2007 12:40, Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
> Thanks understood I will use this configurations for de last span. But
> I think the Carlos Chávez are right about this. I realy forgot to put
> jumpers to set E1 mode in TE420 card, if it's come with the jumpers
> open (and I beli
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Monday 03 December 2007 12:40, Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
>> Thanks understood I will use this configurations for de last span. But
>> I think the Carlos Chávez are right about this. I realy forgot to put
>> jumpers to set E1 mode in TE420 card, if it's come with th
I agree, if you never changed the jumper.
I have never noticed, does the output of ztcfg change is it set to E1?
Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Thanks understood I will use this configurations for de last span. But
> I think the Carlos Chávez are right about this. I realy forgot t
Richard Lyman wrote:
> I have never noticed, does the output of ztcfg change is it set to E1?
Yes. More channels. :)
Regards,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
Asterisk
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Richard Lyman wrote:
>
>
>> I have never noticed, does the output of ztcfg change is it set to E1?
>>
>
> Yes. More channels. :)
>
> Regards,
> Philipp Kempgen
>
>
only if defined
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation P
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:56:51PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> > On Monday 03 December 2007 12:40, Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
> >> Thanks understood I will use this configurations for de last span. But
> >> I think the Carlos Chávez are right about this. I realy fo
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Richard Lyman wrote:
>
> > I have never noticed, does the output of ztcfg change is it set to E1?
>
> Yes. More channels. :)
No. The channels listed in ztcfg -vv are the channels you wrote in
zaptel.conf . By the time they are pr
2007/12/4, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> > Richard Lyman wrote:
> >
> > > I have never noticed, does the output of ztcfg change is it set to E1?
> >
> > Yes. More channels. :)
>
> No. The channels listed in ztcfg -vv are the
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 07:06:14AM -0200, Roger C. Beraldi Martins wrote:
> 2007/12/4, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> > > Richard Lyman wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have never noticed, does the output of ztcfg change is it set to
> Jsut a dumb question: are all four ports connected to the telco? If not:
> which of them is?
>
Yes the first 3 spans are connected to de teleco, the last one no.
> >
> > Now I'm talking with Technical support from teleco operator (Brasil
> > Telecom) to confirm de cable standard.
> >
Great !
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:56:51PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
>>> modprobe wct4xxp t1e1override=15
>>>
>>> t1e1override is a bitwise parameter, 0 being all T1, 15 being all E1 and
>>> numbers in between as different combinations of T1 and E1 for
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> The proper way to set module parameters is in /etc/modprobe.conf or
> in a file under /etc/modprobe.d (depending what your distribution uses .
> modprobe of 2.6 can use either). Put there the line:
>
> options wct4xxp t1e1override=15
Like so:
echo 'options wct4xxp t1e1o
has anybody ever seen a red alarm on an fxo port (tdm400) whenever you
unplug a pstn line? I think i saw a post on the mailing list a few years
back about this, but never actually seen one
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
have an asterisk box (P4, 1GB RAM, etc ) with a sangoma two E1 port card in
it. I have used a E1 cross cable to connect the two E1 ports together and
pass calls through them for testing purposes allo works fine. also have
multiple voip phones connected to this setup,
what i noticed is that when
ginal Message -
From: "Brent Franks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:28 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm / Alarm Cleared Zaptel Issue (bug?)
> Hello,
>
> About every 2 or 3 days I notice in the messages log fi
nting
exercise that was.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:17 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Red Alarm / Alarm Cleared Zaptel Issue
(bug?)
I would say no because
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:51:56AM +0800, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> has anybody ever seen a red alarm on an fxo port (tdm400) whenever you
> unplug a pstn line? I think i saw a post on the mailing list a few years
> back about this, but never actually seen one
I've not personally tested this, but I did
I should clarify on my post, i can see a red alarm on cat /proc/dahdi/1 but
never when using dahdi_tool
in cat /proc/dahdi/1:
Span 1: WCTDM/4 "Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F Board 5" (MASTER)
1 WCTDM/4/0 FXSKS (In use) RED(SWEC: OSLEC)
2 WCTDM/4/1 FXSKS (In use) RED(SWEC: OSLEC)
3 WCTDM/4/2 FX
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:58:10AM +0800, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> I should clarify on my post, i can see a red alarm on cat /proc/dahdi/1 but
> never when using dahdi_tool
>
> in cat /proc/dahdi/1:
> Span 1: WCTDM/4 "Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F Board 5" (MASTER)
>
>1 WCTDM/4/0 FXSKS (In use) RED(SW
On Friday 26 August 2011, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> has anybody ever seen a red alarm on an fxo port (tdm400) whenever you
> unplug a pstn line? I think i saw a post on the mailing list a few years
> back about this, but never actually seen one
That's what mine (TDM410P clone with 2 * FXO + 2 * FXS)
i am comparing the experience of using an analog span to a T1 for example:
if i have a 3 quad port t1 card, with the initial view of dahdi_tool, i can
easily tell if a line is not working
now supposed i have a system with 3 24port cards, with just watching the
main view of dahdi_tool,
i cannot do t
waitfordialtone=yes on chan_dahdi.conf is supposed to be the perfect
solution, but does it work on on UK lines?
Kelvin Chua
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> i am comparing the experience of using an analog span to a T1 for example:
> if i have a 3 quad port t1 card, with t
SYNOPSIS
Erratic red alarm T1 PRI on asterisk, but zttool running concurrently
during alarm shows no errors, irq misses, or alarms, on any span.
Using asterisk and quad Digium T405P, configured as follows:
Span 1 connects to ISDN PRI (fractional 8 B channels, D channel 24).
Span 2 connects to T1
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Vikram Rangnekar wrote:
> what i noticed is that when i pull any one end of the E1 (breaking the E1
> connection) I get multiple RED ALARMS on the zap channels I understand this
> is ok and should happen if the E1 link breaks but my problem is that asterisk
> stops doing a lot
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Peter Svensson wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Vikram Rangnekar wrote:
>
> > what i noticed is that when i pull any one end of the E1 (breaking the E1
> > connection) I get multiple RED ALARMS on the zap channels I understand this
> > is ok and should happen if the E1 link brea
On 05/05/05 18:43 Peter Svensson said the following:
My guess is that the Sangoma card does not switch to internal clocking
when the external clocking is lost, thus depriving Asterisk of the zaptel
if this is the case, the sangoma would need to fix this asap. it'd be hard
explaining to a custom
Hello,
If I put two spans' worth of channels, say 1-23 from span 1 and 25-47 in
span 2, in one group, but only span 2 was showing OK and the other was
down / showing a RED alarm, would asterisk automatically skip over
trying to use channels 1-23 when doing outbound calls? e.g.,
dial(dahdi/g1/(numb
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:31:09AM -0600, Hose wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I put two spans' worth of channels, say 1-23 from span 1 and 25-47 in
> span 2, in one group, but only span 2 was showing OK and the other was
> down / showing a RED alarm, would asterisk automatically skip over
> trying to use
hi,
yes, this is the way, asterisk / the channeldriver handles it.
you can simulate the failure of one span by just pulling out the cable
and see what happens..
on top, you can influence the order, the channels are used by using
dahdi/g1 or dahdi/G1...
regards,
yves
Am 05.03.2013 07:31, schrie
What you say...Yves A. (yves...@gmx.de):
> yes, this is the way, asterisk / the channeldriver handles it.
> you can simulate the failure of one span by just pulling out the
> cable and see what happens..
> on top, you can influence the order, the channels are used by using
> dahdi/g1 or dahdi/G1..
81 matches
Mail list logo
