Dear Arash,
Thanks for the feedback, I reinstalled AUCTeX from the GIT repo, and after
erasing my customization & relaunching Emacs it worked, as expected with MiKTeX.
Just out of curiosity : do you have any idea of what the root cause of this
change of behaviour is ? What surprises me is not re
this list. So
next time I would send my contribution with Emacs using the gmail SMTP.
Vincent.
De : Tassilo Horn
Envoyé : vendredi 18 août 2017 18:20
À : Vincent Belaïche
Cc : m...@gnu.org; auctex@gnu.org
Objet : Re: TR: Tex-info contribution
Tassilo Horn writes:
>> It seems t
Hello Mosè,
Not surprisingly, I fully agree with you, concerning the previous version being
better. Not because of simplicity, but because the TeX part should look as much
as possible as the standard \TeX logo. Also the community logo is about
community, and is less well known as Emacs splash s
Attached is the modified LaTeX code with the rounded coordinates for the
community logo E.
Vincent.
From: vincent@hotmail.fr
To: tkp...@gmail.com; m...@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:39:16 +0100
CC: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for
Not sure whether you are going to like it. I replaced the plain E by the E from
Emacs community logo, and also the X by a chi, because this should be this way
in TeX after all.
Vincent.
PS: Surely it is possible to make the community logo more concise by rounding
figures, currently this is
Hello,
Assuming that the green E is supposed to stand for "Emacs", wouldn't it be
preferable to use the same symbol as in the Emacs community logo
(https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsLogo). The SVG source is available, so it
is probably possible to get just the E in Inscape and to export it a
Just as a side comment : the logo could also be used on the front page of the
manual printed version.
Vincent.
> From: m...@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 01:34:10 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas
> To: tkp...@gmail.co
Hello,
Could it be some more elaborate drawing, like for instance:
- A lion ploughing by making with its plow lines of lipsum on a
book, and the plow is pulled forward by a gnu.
- A lion riding on a gnu,
- A lion forging a book on an anvil made with letters from the word Emacs
- A lion hunting a
he same amount of preparation
> as the technique of \doc¡umentclass which I adopted near the end of the
> thread (which works using \catcode`\¡ 9 ).
>
> Best, Jean-François
>
> Le 29 févr. 2016 à 23:38, Vincent Belaïche a écrit :
>
>> Salut Jean-François,
>>
>> Not
Salut Jean-François,
Not tested idea :
Can't you fool the parser by writing \^^64ocumentclass instead of
\documentclass when you are inside the verbatim env.
I guess that the ^^64 is parsed by TeX input processor, so it is not sensitive
to verbatim catcodification. Am I wrong ?
Vincent.
bject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2016-01-08 12:27 GMT+01:00 Vincent Belaïche :
>> Hello Mosè,
>>
>> Ok, so the way we go is to have multi-d
...@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:26:26 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2016-01-05 10:25 GMT+01:00 Vincent Belaïche :
>> Hello Mosè,
roblems.
> I can also select the value of the dialect to be written looking to the
> `major-mode' variable, but the problem with TeX files is still there:
> what to do in that case? The same question may be raised also for
> ConTeXt files: is :latex fine in that case?
>
> Bye,
>
@ericabrahamsen.net; bbdb-i...@lists.sourceforge.net; auctex@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2015-12-01 0:30 GMT+01:00 Vincent Belaïche :
>> This would be easilly analysed with some expression like
>>
>> (with-temp-buffer
>> (insert "" formatter-string "&
"" formatter-string "")
(xml-parse-region (point-min) (point-max)))
VBR,
Vincent
> To: bbdb-i...@lists.sourceforge.net
> From: e...@ericabrahamsen.net
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] AUCTeX support in lettre
> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 16:
good
alternative.
VBR,
Vincent Belaïche
PS: CC to BBDB list.
> From: m...@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:23:13 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] AUCTeX support in lettre
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
Dear AUCTeX experts,
For your information I intend to add AUCTeX support to package lettre of which
I am the maintainer.
Here is a preliminary verison, comments/brickbats welcome...
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/lettre_observatoire/trunk/source/latex/lettre/lettre.el?revision=177&view=markup
My i
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:48:05 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Patch to tex-info.el to support node name completion in
> @..ref commands, and solve a few other pbs
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2015-11-09 17:55 GMT+01:00 Vincent Belaïche :
>&
> From: m...@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 01:06:26 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Patch to tex-info.el to support node name completion in
> @..ref commands, and solve a few other pbs
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2015
Hello Sivaram,
Make is not the best tool for LaTeX because often you have auxiliary
files that are both output and input and need to be written several
times. So the time-stamp based logic of Make is not adequate.
Rather, like Tassilo, I use latexmk. Probably latexmk mydoc.tex will not
do readill
Oct 2015 10:32:42 +0100
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
>> I have not tested the change, but reading this:
[...]
>> are to do more clever things it would be better to integrate the
>> change with reftex so that node references can also appear in the
>> reftex *
> From: t...@gnu.org
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Patch to tex-info.el to support node name completion in
> @..ref commands, and solve a few other pbs
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:43:08
would certainly be smaller in a buffer where nodes
are not empty.
VBR,
Vincent Belaïche
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Ooops... Sorry for the multiple sending of exactly the same email...
Vincent.
> From: vincent@hotmail.fr
> To: monn...@iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:46:45 +0100
> CC: auctex@gnu.org; t...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Patch to tex-i
Ok, I should have read the *Help* more carefully, it states
(cl-pushnew X PLACE): insert X at the head of the list if not already there.
and I understood "there" as meaning "head of the list", instead of just "list".
Of course the second sentence clarifies the point, but I overlooked it.
Ma
Ok, I should have read the *Help* more carefully, it states
(cl-pushnew X PLACE): insert X at the head of the list if not already there.
and I understood "there" as meaning "head of the list", instead of just "list".
Of course the next sentence in the docstring clarifies the point, but I
ov
f commands, and solve a few other pbs
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:16:20 +0100
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
>> Ooops... sorry, I hadn't noticed that you also had switched to git.
>
> Hey, that has been in April 2013! :-)
Ok, I understand what
Dear AUCTeX experts,
I would like to submit to you the attached patch.
VBR,
Vincent Belaïche
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel
antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index ca4d1e6..40
Hello,
In such a case wouldn't you need that the compilation command is some lisp
fonction that does the prior variable setting prior to launching the usual
region compilation --- or maybe some hook function is already available for
making this sort of "pre-regioning" thing easier.
Vincent
Hello Tassilo,
[...]
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
>
> BTW: Your patches contained some minor problems in that they introduced
> trailing whitespaces and spaces before tabs in indented code. New
> versions of Git emit warnings for that that and it was easy to fix them
> after applying your patches. But sti
Hello Tassilo,
> From: t...@gnu.org
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:26:40 +0200
>
> Vincent Bela
Here you are.
Vincent.
> From: t...@gnu.org
> To: vincent@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:18:00 +0200
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
> Hi
Just to say: do not pay too much attention to the ChangeLog is the patch
attached to my previous mail, as it needs update --- I will do that with
the rests of pending changes (ie NEWS & manual).
Vincent.
>Hello,
>
>Attached is the other patch --- that with bitmap based style hook
>dialect set
Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:56:02 +0200
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
> >> FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an appropriate
> >> info doc update & NEWS entry (Vince
ug with existing style
> hooks.
>
I think so, but I have made only basic tests with Texinfo and plain
LaTeX.
> Bye,
> Tassilo
Bye,
Vincent.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 9b70f3a..2318fb7 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,329 @@
+2014-09-08 Vincent Belaïche
Ok, now I look into Tassilo's feedback on the patch itself...
> To: auctex@gnu.org
> From: t...@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:49:26 +0200
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
Trying to catch-up the discussion...
> To: auctex@gnu.org
> From: t...@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:34:49 +0200
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
>
[...]
> >
> > I renamed it `nor' because I think that a user may want to pass
> > expli
@@ -1,3 +1,329 @@
+2014-09-08 Vincent Belaïche
+
+ * style/xspace.el ("xspace"): Add LaTeX-dialect to TeX-add-style-hook call.
+
+ * style/xparse.el ("xparse"): Add LaTeX-dialect to TeX-add-style-hook call.
+
+ * style/virtex.el ("virtex"): Add LaTeX-dialect to TeX
014 09:44:16 +0200
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
[...]
> > Question: shouldn't I provide a small patch only for that defalias
> > TeX-assoc-string for XEmacs compatibility before we go to this more
> > substantial one.
>
> No, I've jus
g b/ChangeLog
index 01ff6dc..b154d6f 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,330 @@
+2014-09-06 Vincent Belaïche
+
+ * style/xspace.el ("xspace"): Add LaTeX-dialect to TeX-add-style-hook call.
+
+ * style/xparse.el ("xparse"): Add LaTeX-dialect to TeX-add-style-ho
tly using. ;-)
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
Here you are...
Vincent.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 791a5a1..163bab5 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,48 @@
+2014-08-21 Vincent Belaïche
+
+ * ChangeLog: align my address to that which I used for registering
+ the projec
[...]
> > BTW, in my previous contributions the git commits were with
> > --author=vincent@hotmail.fr, which a git log does show, although
> > the ChangeLog is with my address @sourceforge. I think that you should
> > keep it this way for git repo consistency (maybe we change the
> > ChangeLo
ou should keep
it this way for git repo consistency (maybe we change the ChangeLog some
day which is easier, so for git please keep the same author). Sorry for
introducing this who-I-am discrepancy.
Bye,
Vincent.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 791a5a1..94dcf6e 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
++
...@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2014-08-16 7:04 GMT+02:00 Vincent Belaïche :
> > BTW, I later thought that is may be useful to have more elements in the
> > vector to specify what caused the addition of the hook. For instance
> > that would now be
> >
> >
Let us answer to this one now...
[...]
>
> > +context only, or a vector [TeX-style-hook HOOK-FUN CONTEXT] where
> > +HOOK-FUN is the hook function to be run, and CONTEXT is a symbol
> > +defining in which context the hook function may be run.
>
> Why [TeX-style-hook HOOK-FUN CONTEXT] and not simp
cent.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 4da30d5..7140ec2 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,26 @@
+2014-08-15 Vincent Belaïche
+
+ * tex-info.el (TeX-texinfo-mode): Code optimization: use
+ '(set (make-local-variable (quote foo)) some-value)' instead of
+ '
> From: m...@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 15:26:06 +0200
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
> collision
> To: darthand...@gmail.com
> CC: vincent@hotmail.fr; auctex@gnu.org; k...@freefriends.org; t...@gnu.org
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> 2014-08-14 18:26 GMT+02:0
As far as I can understand you are sort of embedding Maxima code into LaTeX
code and you would like the Maxima edit mode for the pieces of Maxima codes
only.
I think that the same sort of thing is needed for Asymptote
(http://asymptote.sourceforge.net/), not sure how/whether they handle it.
Maybe
Dear all,
I have found a problem with AUCTeX. Here is the observed problem: when I
edit a Texinfo file named latex2e.texi 'C-c C-f' does not provide
Texinfo-font-list but LaTeX-font-list. The problem happens only if
latex2e.texi is not the first file I am editing, but I have edited some
LaTeX file
+1,15 @@
+2014-01-06 Vincent Belaïche
+
+ * tex-info.el (Texinfo-reftex-hook): Replace use of
+ reftex-tables-dirty by that of reftex-default-label-alist-entries
+ to trigger call to reftex-compile-variables in a standard way. The
+ problem was that generating a toc for a Texinfo file and then for
-toc when both LaTeX and Texinfo
> file are visited.
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
>> Sorry, it is a mistake if I had set importance high. I have attached
>> an alternative patch which should be a little more efficient
>> processing p
Sorry, it is a mistake if I had set importance high. I have attached an
alternative patch which should be a little more efficient processing power wise
--- ie less impact on LaTeX files, only Texinfo is affected.
Once I get some feedback I can provide some ChangeLog statement also.
Vincent.
Hello Ralf & alii,
I have found a problem in the implementation of the Texinfo reftex
plugin which I had formerly provided --- quite some time ago.
When you open a Texinfo file first and launch the TOC, and then open a
LaTeX file --- and these two files are the two first ones that invoke
AUCTeX -
[...]
>
> I'll commit the auctex changes on Monday. Feel free to commit the
> reftex changes whenever you want.
>
> Thanks for your contribution!
> Tassilo
I made the commit on emacs/lisp a short while ago.
Vincent.
___
auctex mailing list
auctex
Hello,
> To: auctex@gnu.org
> From: t...@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:39:21 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Update for TOC parsing
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> > As agreed previously, I have ported my contribution for Texinfo TOC
&g
quot;
> (car x))
> (cons (car x) (- (cadr x)))
> (cons (car x) (cadr x
> texinfo-section-list
> (set (make-local-variable (car v) ) (cdr v)))
> (setq reftex-tables-dirty t)
> (reftex-ensure-compiled-variables)))
683a734,738
> ;; RefTeX
> To: auctex@gnu.org
> From: t...@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:30:55 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] RefTeX TOC for Texinfo
>
> Vincent Belaïche writes:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> > I have made an update of AUCTeX recently and this lost my change on
> > Tex
Hello,
I have made an update of AUCTeX recently and this lost my change on
Texinfo TOC handling. It seems that either the patch has never been
applied, or the project has migrated to another repo...
Vicnent.
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
ht
ping
From: vincent.belai...@gmail.com
To: auctex@gnu.org; auctex-de...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:40:48 +0200
CC: vincent.belai...@gmail.com
Subject: [AUCTeX] RefTeX / Texinfo integration
Dear all,
Here is a contribution that makes RefTeX TOC function more or less work
with Texinfo file
ping
From: vincent@hotmail.fr
To: vincent.belai...@gmail.com; auctex@gnu.org; auctex-de...@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:24:55 +0200
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problème with AUCTeX Manual
ping
From: vincent.belai...@gmail.com
To: auctex@gnu.org; auctex-de...@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 201
(add-hook 'reftex-mode-hook 'Texinfo-reftex-hook)
> (if (and (boundp 'reftex-mode) reftex-mode)
> (Texinfo-reftex-hook))
>
Index: ChangeLog
===
ping
From: vincent.belai...@gmail.com
To: auctex@gnu.org; auctex-de...@gnu.org
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:02:39 +0200
CC: vincent.belai...@gmail.com
Subject: [AUCTeX] Problème with AUCTeX Manual
Dear all,
Recently I tried to compile the AUCTeX manual. I am using latest Texinfo
compiler texi2any
Dear all,
Recently I tried to compile the AUCTeX manual. I am using latest Texinfo
compiler texi2any based on perl, and there were several compilation
errors. I double checked with Patrice Dumas who is the main developper
of texi2any and he proposed the attached patch.
I must say that the patch t
lf
Salut Ralf & AUCTeX-devel,
This email contains a novel patch where node & sections are marked by
different functions.
I will provide a corresponding patch to documentation after this one is
accepted.
Here is the changelog:
-------
k about
> development topics on the development list. So I'm crossposting this to
> auctex-devel and setting a Mail-Followup-To.
>
> * Vincent Belaïche (2011-05-17) writes:
>
> > Quite some time ago I had submitted a contribution to have mark
> > environment and mar
Hello,
This is a reminder, it seems that my previous mail was archieved in Gmane, but
not bounced to anybody. Here is the link.
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.auctex.general/day=20110517
Vincent.
___
au
Hello Ralf,
Quite some time ago I had submitted a contribution to have mark
environment and mark section commands for Texinfo also. I made an update
of AUCTeX recently and I realized that they are still not in the CVS
tree...
I attach again the patch made at that time, but certainly the diff was
Hello,
As there was no answer on my previous email I took the opportunity to
update my contribution: I added also the mark section function, as it
was also missing to the Texinfo-mode
BR,
Vincent.
tex-info.el.diff.gz
Description: patch file
ChangeLog.gz
Description: Change log
Ooops,
Please ignore the previous patch file, and consider the one attached to
this file.
Vincent.
> From: vincent@hotmail.fr
> To: auctex@gnu.org; ang...@caeruleus.net
> CC: vincent@hotmail.fr
> Subject: Contribution to AUCTeX
> Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 07:20:58 +0200
>
> Hello,
>
> He
Hello,
Here is a contribution to AUCTeX, this is to add the mark-environement
to the Texinfo mode.
Vincent.
PS--1: I also took the opportunity of this change to optimize the
regexp. I know that it is bad practice to make two changes in the same
patch, but that seemed so minor to me, that I co
Hello,
Thanks for the link to Sumatra, I have installed it, it seems that its
the good tool to work with AUCTeX under MSWindows.
Concerning DocView, at least for me it does not work, although my Emacs
version is GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.0.2195) of 2009-07-25.
It seems that Emacs can'
1 Aug 2009 09:21:15 +0100
> Subject: [AUCTeX] Re: Hooks for command on region and command on master
>
> On 2009-08-01 08:18 +0100, Vincent Belaïche wrote:
> > The reason is that I prefer to have GSView for region because it is
> > possible to ask reload with a command line o
Just to say that hooks may not be the best solution. if region or master
was informed by a special keyword in the style option list, then this
could also do the job.
However using style options may cause regression to existing
configuration.
Maybe another possible and better solution would be tha
Dear all,
I would like to use different viewers when I view a region and when I
view the master file.
The reason is that I prefer to have GSView for region because it is
possible to ask reload with a command line option (namely -e) without
opening a new Window. However GSView is not that performa
So what was the decision from the group concerning my proposal for
LaTeX-mark-environment with negative arguments...
Regards,
Vincent.
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
* Vincent Belaïche (2009-06-28) writes:
I would like to contribute again on LaTeX-mark-environment. I find it
practicle if an
ent.
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
* Vincent Belaïche (2009-06-28) writes:
I would like to contribute again on LaTeX-mark-environment. I find it
practicle if an argument <= 0 can be used to count environements from
top downwards.
Hm, I'm not sure I like this. I'd probably prefer
Dear Ralf,
I would like to contribute again on LaTeX-mark-environment. I find it
practicle if an argument <= 0 can be used to count environements from
top downwards.
Here is my contribution (its seems to be more than 11 lines, I can fill
in the GNU form if need be):
Best regards,
Vincent.
;
What about it ?
Vincent.
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
> I'd post the idea on the Emacs development list for discussion.
>
>
_
Email envoyé avec Windows Live Hotmail. Dites adieux aux spam et virus, passez
à Hotmail ! C'est gratui
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
*Please confirm your intention* :
do you object to my contribution ?
If yes, you seem however to see some need for unfillable sections, could
you please tell me how I could make this function available in an
acceptable manner, as I do need for it, and I am sure that othe
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
* Vincent Belaïche (2008-08-10) writes:
Then there are two drawbacks for that
1) the user has to care not to make a M-q when the point is in the
pre-preprocessor code
That's what I've already written above. Of course this would not be a
problem if
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
I don't think that this would be enough, because even though by some
tampering with variable `paragraph-separate' one line of preprocessor
code could be recognized as a single paragraph, this would not prevent
that this line may be folded into two lines if it is too long,
Ooops, forgotten to CC the list.
Vincent Belaïche a écrit :
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
Is the preprocessor code separated in some way from the rest of the
comment?
Yes it is, each line of the preprocessor code has some specific Eupp
start-mark, and some specfic Eupp end-mark
Then you could
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
* Vincent Belaïche (2008-08-08) writes:
I think that this can be usefull for some other users (e.g. if you have
a table within a comment, you would not like
filling to destroy the column alignments in the table).
I could not find that such a possibility already
iding diff
files for documentation and latex.el, and a change log.
BR,
Vincent.
Vincent Belaïche a écrit :
Dear Ralf,
I would like to make a contribution on comment filling. This
contribution has not been yet developped, I am just asking for your
opinion before doing anything.
For som
Dear Ralf,
I would like to make a contribution on comment filling. This
contribution has not been yet developped, I am just asking for your
opinion before doing anything.
For some reason I need that some special comments be not filled. These
special comments are defined by this that
1) th
Dear Ralf,
Sorry for the very very long delay: as far as I understood a patch is
just a unified diff file between modified file and
latest version. I downloaded the latest latex.el version from the CVS
Web interface (this is the version you have modified about 116 minutes ago.
And I made the di
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
> You should not use it in a hook at all. Just use the code I proposed
> and be done.
>
>
Dear Ralf,
Sorry to dwell on it :
I was using it in a hook in the first place because I needed that the
variable LaTeX-font-list be defined, which you overcome by the using the
e
' command should test whether the current
buffer is in LaTeX mode or not and use the LaTeX-font-list instead of
TeX-font-list when the buffer mode is LaTeX.
BR,
Vincent.
> * Vincent Belaïche (2008-05-16) writes:
>
>
>> Note that the AucTeX info node "Font Spe
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
> * Vincent Belaïche (2008-05-12) writes:
>
>
>> By the way, you seem to be an AucTeX guru, and I have a minor problem
>> with AucTeX which I would like to explain to you:
>>
>> I have added the following customization in my init file
TeX dualism ?
BR,
Vincent.
PS-1 : my AUCTeX-version = "2007-01-23"
PS-2 : I think that the same problem occur if the customization is done
via the custom-set-variables command, but I am not 100% sure.
Ralf Angeli a écrit :
> * Vincent Belaïche (2008-05-11) writes:
>
>
Hello,
To mark as region an environment I find it slightly more convenient in
some case if you can pass a numeric argument to LaTeX-mark-environment
to tell it how many level upwards the environment to be selected is.
Here is how I suggest to modify latex.el (the old code is commented out) :
-
91 matches
Mail list logo
