[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread ceejay
OK guys, can I respectfully suggest that we let this one drop? The last two pages of posts have created only heat, no light. IMO. Ceejay. -- ceejay ceejay's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=148

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Suggestion: New mid-market player

2007-01-22 Thread cliveb
)p(;172835 Wrote: My suggestion, add 2 little high quality class-d amps inside the transporter case. Icepower based modules and power supplies can be really small and still sound very very good. Result one very great integrated network player amp...all what one needs in one nice package.

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread opaqueice
95bcwh Wrote: If you don't know how to change your pm, that shows your lack of basic IT skill..you can't be that stupid are you?? :)) 95bcwh;172838 Wrote: When I said you're being disrespectful, I refers to the language you used, the way you laughed at the guy trying to sell Bolder's

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Suggestion: New mid-market player

2007-01-22 Thread opaqueice
One possibility is to make a boombox or headset with wifi built in, allowing you to access squeezenetwork, internet radio, pandora, your own networked music, etc. As streaming music services and public wifi continue to spread, I think such a thing could become very, very popular - it would be

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread 95bcwh
opaqueice;172933 Wrote: With posts like these appearing, I second the suggestion to let this thread die. It's quite apparent what's going on here (the emperor has no clothes), and nothing is gained by continuing this. If anyone's aim was to defend the reputation of Bolder mods,

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread rajacat
tomjtx;172836 Wrote: Yes Raj, Wayne contacted me . You did make that sugestion , but I did not contact him. He must have been following the thread and contacted me re: an audition. In fact, he PM'd me twice before I was able to respond. This was not a case of me requesting to audition

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread tomjtx
95bcwh;172946 Wrote: Of course, you're in the same camp as Tom, it's easier for you to make that judgement. And you don't know the full story. My aim is not to defend the reputation of the Bolder Mods. My aim is to expose why Tom is behaving like what he has been. I couldn't have cared

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread whdean
I have a recently purchased an SB3 that I use with a modest NAD integrated and NHT speakers in my study. I like it so much that I would like to purchase another SB3 for my family room. The family room system is primarily HT, but with components a step up from the Big Box Stores. I am using a

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread tomjtx
rajacat;172951 Wrote: Tom, Does this look familiar? Congrats Wayne, As I said in my Slim forum review , you have done a great job with your mods. Anyone who already has you modded SB with Ultimate PS doesn't need to buy a Transporter. Raja Your point being? Of course the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread tomjtx
Bill, I have heard a lot of the mods and I can give you my opinion for my system: Rowland Watt/Puppies. These things can be system dependant and personal preference. Please note the following is all IMO The biggest improvement to the SB is the stock elpac PSU. Probably any decent PSU will give

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread rajacat
Bill, I would suggest that you go to http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/index.php?board=46.0 and submit the same post. That forum has many more participants so the odds are that you will find more useful and objective information. Raja -- rajacat

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread Mark Lanctot
Guys: Do you want this thread locked? -- Mark Lanctot It's like, you know, a New Age religion, but with better treble response. - Jon Heal Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread tomjtx
Mark Lanctot;172986 Wrote: Guys: Do you want this thread locked? I think that's a good idea. -- tomjtx tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: To DAC or not to DAC

2007-01-22 Thread Pat Farrell
tomjtx wrote: Mark Lanctot;172986 Wrote: Do you want this thread locked? I think that's a good idea. Any thread that degenerates into name calling and insults has no place in civilized society. Dragging out ancient records to bolster the argument is a sign that soon Goodwin's law will be

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread totoro
rajacat;172984 Wrote: Bill, I would suggest that you go to http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/index.php?board=46.0 and submit the same post. That forum has many more participants so the odds are that you will find more useful and objective information. Raja Sadly, no. They have many

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-22 Thread sc53
What are buff books? Is this a Britishism? -- sc53 sc53's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8690 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31860

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread rajacat
totoro;172992 Wrote: Sadly, no. They have many more participants, yes. More objective? Well, you think so because more people there agree with you, as far as I can see. But objective? I wouldn't say so. The size of the forum has nothing to do with the mean objectivity of the posts. This

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread tomjtx
rajacat;173009 Wrote: Now reallythis is a manufacturers forum which is bound to be populated by Slim Devices fanboys whereas AC is an open forum. BTW have you ever auditioned Bybee filters or conducted a double blind test. I doubt it, so therefore your opinion really does not mean much

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread totoro
tomjtx;173012 Wrote: The AC forum has manufacturers circles as well. On the Bolder forum you will of course see a lot of positive remarks about Bolder. It should be noted that the moderator (Bolder) can delete posts at will and it is considered bad form to say something negative about a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-22 Thread Pat Farrell
sc53 wrote: What are buff books? Is this a Britishism? Not if I wrote it, I live in the US. It is a magazine trade phrase. For reasons long lost in the history, magazine folks call them books. Buff books are for fans of an area. Car and Driver, Road and Track, Automobile are US car oriented

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread totoro
I'll let someone else (rajacat?) make the last response to my last post and bow out, since we seem to have hijacked this thread. I apologize for taking part in the hijacking. -- totoro squeezebox 3 - mccormack dna .5 - audio physic tempo 4

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread tomjtx
totoro;173013 Wrote: It actually seems to be considered bad form to say anything about any of the sponsoring manufacturers on _any_ of the audiocircle fora. The reverence for pseudo-science and audio mysticism is certainly higher there. But belief in the there are two sides to every story

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread adamslim
totoro;173013 Wrote: No, I haven't auditioned bybee filters. The technical explanation for them is complete garbage. Based on that, I wouldn't even consider them. I haven't auditioned magic pebbles, the blood of a black rooster sprinkled on the floor, or the magic clock, either. This is an

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-22 Thread opaqueice
Limping_Pylon;173028 Wrote: Can anyone (Sean?) explain how Stereophile even came to do a review of the TP and was SD even aware that this was going on? Do SD marking guys beat on Stereophile or does a phone call come out of the blue with a 'hey can we borrow a unit to review' just kind of

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which Upgrade?

2007-01-22 Thread opaqueice
To the OP - I agree with Skunk; if you're running the output of the SB into a digital preamp, upgrades to the analogue path in the SB are pretty useless (since you'll almost certainly be better off sending a digital signal in to the pre). One other thing to keep in mind is that the cost of

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-22 Thread USAudio
opaqueice;173045 Wrote: If I had to guess, I'd say SD (or Logitech) sent Stereophile a unit to review. As Pat points out, Stereophile reviews are almost never (if ever?) negative, so SD wouldn't have had much to lose. Now that they've given it a good review, SD will have a further

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-22 Thread opaqueice
USAudio;173090 Wrote: That's because they generally only publish reviews on equipment that they recommend. It doesn't mean that if they accept your product for review that it will automatically get a positive review or that review would even be written up and published. So we agree - SD

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modded SB2 Ultimate PS MKII to UK reviewed and compared to the SB+

2007-01-22 Thread Deaf Cat
And...got my attention. Where may we read more when this happens, gonna be interesting :) Cheers -- Deaf Cat Deaf Cat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=515 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Modded SB2 Ultimate PS MKII to UK reviewed and compared to the SB+

2007-01-22 Thread 95bcwh
Deaf Cat;173095 Wrote: And...got my attention. Where may we read more when this happens, gonna be interesting :) Cheers Your best bet is contact Wayne directly at Bolder Cable Company. -- 95bcwh 95bcwh's

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Suggestion: New mid-market player

2007-01-22 Thread Mitch Harding
On the other hand, I do not currently have an external DAC. Count me in the camp of people who intend to purchase a Transporter someday because of the quality internal DAC, so I don't have to put money towards that. On 1/22/07, tonyptony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Smokester;172817 Wrote:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-22 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;173040 Wrote: I believe I've found the fabled plug-and-play linear power supply for the SB. The unit is at www.hosfelt.com, click adapters, 3-5V, 4th one down: 5VDC @ 2.4 Amp Regulated, Filtered and Grounded $US 9.95 Mfg. - GLOB TEK Mfg. # -

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-22 Thread tyler_durden
Is that adapter gold plated? ;) TD -- tyler_durden tyler_durden's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2701 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31971

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: external DAC won't lock on SB3

2007-01-22 Thread Skunk
tyler_durden;172737 Wrote: I love it when people come to realize that the engineers who designed the thing in the first place actually knew what they were doing. Yeah, I love that too- but does it really apply here? The Monica is offered as a DIY kit, and transformers on the S/PDIF input is

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-22 Thread opaqueice
tyler_durden;173122 Wrote: Is that adapter gold plated? ;) TD No, but it'll by cryo treated by the time it arrives here, in this weather... -- opaqueice opaqueice's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-22 Thread jan van mourik
Oh, cool, I never noticed that forum! Thanks! btw, it's the AD1955 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-22 Thread mlsstl
That is a great forum. Dan Lavry is very active there and a prolific writer. He offers a fascinating perspective and very detailed technical info. One item in particular is he notes that a DAC is not just a collection of parts. The critical issue is how they work together. I can confirm that the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-22 Thread Mark Lanctot
P Floding;173117 Wrote: Well done! I guess the tweak is not any longer a tweak now, but instead an upgrade. Just don't let them discover that it's audiophile approved or the price will go up 10X... -- Mark Lanctot It's like, you know, a New Age religion, but with better treble response.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-22 Thread Pat Farrell
Jez wrote: Limping_Pylon;173028 Wrote: I guess I also assumed that SD would have seen the copy and had a opportunity to put HUGE ads in the magazine at the publication date... I can't imagine any magazine doing that. It would be unethical More importantly, it would be suicidal business

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-22 Thread jhm731
I believe you've found a cheap piece of crap that won't sound any better than the stock SMPS wall wart. I can't believe you wimps are so afraid of soldering the right size plug onto a simple two wire connection. LOL!!! opaqueice;173040 Wrote: I believe I've found the fabled plug-and-play

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Suggestion: New mid-market player

2007-01-22 Thread RaK
Guys I am following this thread for quite a while now and I was wondering why nobody suggests a transporter sized box including some (100GB) disk space and a running slimserver. Ideally including a SB3 functionality. Dont know if this is an easy task because of computer/harddisks interfearing